`
`Ryan E. Hatch (SBN 235577)
`rhatch@linerlaw.com
`Jason L. Haas (SBN 217290)
`jhaas@linerlaw.com
`LINER LLP
`1100 Glendon Avenue, 14th Floor
`Los Angeles, California 90024.3518
`Telephone: (310) 500-3500
`Facsimile:
`(310) 500-3501
`Attorneys for Plaintiff SIGNAL IP, INC.
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`SIGNAL IP, INC., a California
`corporation,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`vs.
`AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR CO.,
`INC, a California corporation; HONDA
`OF AMERICA MFG., INC., an Ohio
`corporation,
`
`Defendants.
`
`Case No. 2:14-cv-02454-JAK (JEMx)
`JOINT MOTION TO DISMISS
`
`Hon. John A. Kronstadt
`
`Trial Date: TBD
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`41406.002-2823568v1 (REH)
`
`Case No. 2:14-cv-02454-JAK (JEMx)
`
`JOINT MOTION TO DISMISS
`
`1
`
`Exhibit 1008
`Honda v. Signal IP
`IPR2015-01004
`
`
`
`Case 2:14-cv-02454-JAK-JEM Document 163 Filed 03/23/16 Page 2 of 3 Page ID #:10112
`
`WHEREAS, Plaintiff Signal IP, Inc. (“Plaintiff”) and Defendants American
`Honda Motor Co., Inc. and Honda of America Mfg., Inc. (collectively “Honda” or
`“Defendants”) have resolved Plaintiff’s claims for relief against Defendants and
`counterclaims for relief against Plaintiff asserted in this case.
`NOW, THEREFORE, Plaintiff and Defendants through their attorneys of
`record, request this Court to dismiss Plaintiff’s claims for relief against Defendants
`with prejudice and Defendants’ claims, defenses or counterclaims for relief against
`Plaintiff without prejudice, and with all attorneys’ fees, costs of court and expenses
`borne by the party incurring same.
`
`Dated: March 23, 2016
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`LINER LLP
`
`By:
`
`/s/ Ryan E. Hatch
`Ryan E. Hatch
`Attorneys for Plaintiff SIGNAL IP, INC.
`
`FISH & RICHARDSON, P.D.
`
`By:
`
`/s/ Ahmed J. Davis
`Ahmed J. Davis
`Attorneys for Defendants AMERICAN
`HONDA MOTOR CO., INC. and HONDA
`OF AMERICA MFG., INC.
`
`/ / /
`/ / /
`/ / /
`/ / /
`/ / /
`
`41406.002-2823568v1 (REH)
`
`1
`JOINT MOTION TO DISMISS
`
`Case No. 2:14-cv-02454-JAK (JEMx)
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`2
`
`
`
`Case 2:14-cv-02454-JAK-JEM Document 163 Filed 03/23/16 Page 3 of 3 Page ID #:10113
`
`SIGNATURE CERTIFICATION
`I hereby certify that the content of this document is acceptable to counsel for
`Honda, and I have obtained authorization to affix an electronic signature to this
`document.
`Dated: March 23, 2016
`
`LINER LLP
`
`By:
`
`/s/ Ryan E. Hatch
`Ryan E. Hatch
`Attorneys for Plaintiff SIGNAL IP, INC.
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`41406.002-2823568v1 (REH)
`
`2
`JOINT MOTION TO DISMISS
`
`Case No. 2:14-cv-02454-JAK (JEMx)
`
`3
`
`
`
`Case 2:14-cv-02454-JAK-JEM Document 164 Filed 03/23/16 Page 1 of 2 Page ID #:10116
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`
`
`
`Case No. 2:14-cv-02454-JAK (JEMx)
`
`ORDER GRANTING JOINT
`MOTION TO DISMISS CASE
`
`JS-6
`
`
`
`Hon. John A. Kronstadt
`
`
`
`Trial Date: TBD
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`SIGNAL IP, INC., a California
`corporation,
`
`
`vs.
`
`AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR CO.,
`INC, a California corporation; HONDA
`OF AMERICA MFG., INC., an Ohio
`corporation,
`
`
`
`Defendants.
`
`
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`41406.002-2823575v1 (REH)
`
`
`
`ORDER OF DISMISSAL
`
`Case No. 2:14-cv-02454-JAK (JEMx)
`
`4
`
`
`
`Case 2:14-cv-02454-JAK-JEM Document 164 Filed 03/23/16 Page 2 of 2 Page ID #:10117
`
`
`On this day, Plaintiff Signal IP, Inc. (“Plaintiff”) and Defendants and
`Counterclaim-Plaintiffs American Honda Motor Co., Inc. and Honda of America
`Mfg., Inc. (“Defendants”) announced to the Court that they have resolved Plaintiff’s
`claims for relief against Defendants asserted in this case and Defendants’ claims,
`defenses and/or counterclaims for relief against Plaintiff asserted in this case.
`Plaintiff and Defendants have therefore requested that the Court dismiss Plaintiff’s
`claims for relief against Defendants with prejudice and Defendants’ claims, defenses
`and/or counterclaims for relief against Plaintiff without prejudice, and with all
`attorneys’ fees, costs and expenses taxed against the party incurring same. The
`Court, having considered this request, is of the opinion that their request for
`dismissal should be granted.
`IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff’s claims for relief against
`Defendants are dismissed with prejudice and Defendants’ claims, defenses and/or
`counterclaims for relief against Plaintiff are dismissed without prejudice. IT IS
`FURTHER ORDERED that all attorneys’ fees, costs of court and expenses shall be
`borne by each party incurring the same.
`
`DATED: March 23, 2016
`
`
`
`Hon. John A. Kronstadt
`United States District Judge
`
`
`
`
`
`41406.002-2823575v1 (REH)
`
`
`
`1
`ORDER OF DISMISSAL
`
`Case No. 2:14-cv-02454-JAK (JEMx)
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`5
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
