DECLARATION OF RENEE D. ROGGE2 Ph.D.
`
`Renee D. Rogge, Ph.D., being duly sworn upon her oath, alleges and says as follows:
`
`1.
`
`I am over eighteen years old and have personal knowledge of the matters set forth
`
`in this Declaration.
`
`2.
`
`I am a Professor in Biomedical Engineering and the current Samuel F. Hulbert
`
`Chair of Biomedical Engineering at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology.
`
`I hold degrees in
`
`Biomedical Engineering from Tulane University (1996, BS.) and the University of Iowa (2000,
`
`Ph.D.). My dissertation research focused on the development and validation of a finite element
`
`model of the distal forearm for investigating distal radius fractures and treatment techniques. My
`
`curriculum vitae is attached as Exhibit “A” and provides additional details regarding my
`
`publication and research history.
`
`3.
`
`I am a member of the American Society for Engineering Education and served as
`
`a member of the Design in Engineering Education Division from 2006-2012.
`
`I have been
`
`teaching engineering students at the undergraduate level since 2000.
`
`I teach courses in Graphical
`
`Communications (i.e. Solid Works modeling), Statics and Mechanics of Materials, Conservation
`
`and Accounting Principles (an engineering dynamics course), Biomedical Engineering Labs,
`
`Orthopaedic Biomechanics, Bone Biomechanics, Research Methods in Biomechanics, and the
`
`Capstone Design sequence in Biomedical Engineering. My research experience and interests
`
`include implant design and the use of experimental and finite element analysis techniques.
`
`4.
`
`I have been instructed that in order to determine whether a product, process, or
`
`article of manufacture infringes a US. patent, the court looks to the claims of the patent. For
`
`each claim, there is two step inquiry. First, the court resolves a dispute as the meaning of
`
`particular claim terminology by construing the language of each relevant claim. Second, the
`
`1360676
`
`Lantz Medical, Inc.
`Exhibit # 1009
`
`

`

`properly construed claims are compared to the accused product, process, or article of
`
`manufacture. Mas-Hamilton Group v. LaGard, Inc. 156 F.3d 1206 (Fed. Cir. 1998).
`
`5.
`
`I have been instructed that “Patent claims should be construed as they would be
`
`by those skilled in the art.” Multiform Desiccants. Inc. v. Medzam, Ltd., 133 F.3d 1473. “To
`
`ascertain the true meaning of the claims, it is appropriate to consider the claim language, the
`
`patent specification, and the prosecution history.” Markman v. Westview Instruments, Inc, 52
`
`F.3d 967. “Dictionaries may be used to help the court understand the claim language.” EM]
`
`Group N. Am, Inc. v. Intel Corp, 157 F.3d 887. According to 35 U.S.C. §ll2, paragraph 6,
`
`“means plus function terminology should be construed to cover only the corresponding structure
`
`described in the patent specification.” Valmont Industries, Inc. v. Reinke Mfg. Co, 983 F.2d
`
`1039.
`
`6.
`
`I have been instructed that claim terms should be defined as they would by one of
`
`ordinary skill
`
`in the art. Teleflex,
`
`Inc. Ficosa N. Am. Corp. ,299 F.3d 1313. However,
`
`the
`
`patentee, acting as his or her own lexicographer, may override any such ordinary definition by
`
`clearly setting forth in the patent a unique definition for a disputed term. Alloc. Inc. v. Int '1 Trade
`
`Comm ’n., 342 F.3d 1361.
`
`7.
`
`I have been instructed that claim construction depends first and foremost on
`
`intrinsic evidence. Extrinsic evidence should be used only if the intrinsic evidence is insufficient
`
`to define the claims and never if it contradicts intrinsic evidence. See, for example, Vitrionics
`
`Corp. v. Conception, Inc, 90 F.3d 1576 (Fed. Cir. 1996) and Digital Biometrics, Inc. v. Identix,
`
`Inc, 149 F.3d 1335 (Fed. Cir. 1998).
`
`Page 2 01‘9
`
`LANTZ 1009.2
`
`LANTZ 1009.2
`
`

`

`8.
`
`I have been instructed that claims should be interpreted such that a difference in
`
`meaning is presumed between claims
`
`that use different words or phrases. Comark
`
`Comzm/nications, Inc. v. Harris Corp., 156 F.3d 1182.
`
`9.
`
`I have been instructed that where the claims of a patent are narrowed by
`
`amendment during prosecution of the claims before the USPTO, patentee is estopped from
`
`asserting that the scope of the amended claims covered the abandoned subject matter. Feslo
`
`Corp. v. Shoketsu Kinzoku Kogyo Kabushkl' C0,, 535 US. 722 (2002).
`
`10.
`
`I have been instructed that under 35 U.S.C. § 102, a claim is anticipated, and
`
`therefore invalid, when a single prior art reference discloses each and every element of the
`
`claimed invention. Structural Rubber Prods. Co. v. Park Rubber Co, 749 F.2d 707, 715, 223
`
`U.S.P.Q. 1264, 1270 (Fed. Cir. 1984). If the reference fails to suggest even one limitation of the
`
`claimed invention,
`
`then the claim is not anticipated. Atlas Powder Co. v. El. DuPont De
`
`Nemours & Co, 750F.2d 1569, 1574, 224 U.S.P.Q. 409, 411 (Fed. Cir. 1984).
`
`11.
`
`l have been instructed that a petitioner’s burden before the USPTO is limited to
`
`proving invalidity of any relevant claims by a preponderance of the evidence. SAP America. Inc.
`
`v. Versata Development Group, Inc. (CBM2012-00001), referencing 35 U.S.C. § 326(e).
`
`12.
`
`l have been instructed that in matters before the USPTO and the Patent Trial and
`
`Appeal Board, patent claims are construed according to their broadest reasonable interpretation.
`
`SAP America, Inc. v. Versata Development Group, Inc. (CBM2012-00001).
`
`13.
`
`The references that I reviewed in preparation of this Declaration are:
`
`a.
`
`US. Patent No. 8,784,343 (previously marked as Exhibit 1001 of the ‘343
`
`IPR);
`
`Page 3 01‘9
`
`LANTZ 1009.3
`
`LANTZ 1009.3
`
`

`

`b.
`
`Prosecution History of US. Patent No. 8,784,343 (Previously marked as
`
`Exhibit 1002 of the “343 IPR); and
`
`c.
`
`Expert report of Marta L. Villarraga, PhD. (previously marked as Exhibit
`
`1006 of the ‘343 IPR)
`
`d.
`
`Patentee’s
`
`Infringement Contentions
`
`for Case No.:
`
`1:14-cv-00609
`
`(previously marked as Exhibit 1007 of the ‘343 IPR);
`
`e.
`
`Photographs of the TenoStretch (“TenoStretch”)
`
`(previously marked as
`
`Exhibit 1008 (K) ofthe ‘343 IPR)
`
`14.
`
`Based on the technologies disclosed, it is my opinion that a person of ordinary
`
`skill in the art at the time of US. Patent No. 8,784,343 would be an occupational therapist,
`
`physical therapist, mechanical engineer, and/or biomedical engineer with three to five years of
`
`experience designing or evaluating the design of orthotics.
`
`15.
`
`The “343 patent issued from US. Patent Application Serial Number 13/194,496
`
`The earliest effective filing date of the ‘343 patent is August 12, 2005. The ‘343 patent includes
`
`1 independent claim and 3 claim dependent claims. The independent claim at issue is Claim 1.
`
`16.
`
`Claims 1 through 4 of the‘343 patent read as follows:
`
`a.
`
`1. A device for increasing the range of motion of a tissue in a body of a
`patient, the device comprising: a first cuff configured to couple to a first body
`portion; a second cuff configured to couple to a second body portion; a drive
`assembly operatively connected to the first and second cuffs and operable to
`drive movement of the second cuff with respect to the first cuff to adjust a
`position of the second cuff relative to the first cuff; a first arm member
`operatively connecting the first cuff to the drive assembly; a second arm
`member operatively connecting the second cuff to the drive assembly, the
`second arm member movable with respect to the first arm member in response
`to the operation of the drive assembly to adjust a position of the second arm
`member relative to the first arm member; a force element operatively
`connected to the second arm member, the force element comprising a spring
`configured to apply a spring force to the second arm member to urge
`movement of the second arm member relative to the first arm member; and a
`
`Page 4 of“)
`
`LANTZ 1009.4
`
`LANTZ 1009.4
`
`

`

`lockout element having a locking position and configured to selectively inhibit
`the spring from urging movement of the second arm member relative to the
`first arm member when in the locking position, wherein the drive assembly is
`configured to selectively operate to drive movement of the second arm
`member with respect to the first arm member independent of the spring when
`the lockout element is in the locking position.
`
`2. A device for increasing the range of motion of a tissue in a body of a patient
`set forth in claim 1, wherein the drive assembly imparts movement of the
`spring relative to the first cuff in response to operation of the drive assembly
`in driving movement of the second cuff with respect to the first cuff.
`
`3. A device for increasing the range of motion of a tissue in a body ofa patient
`set forth in claim 1, wherein the drive assembly comprises a worm and a gear
`engaging the worm.
`
`b.
`
`c.
`
`d. 4. A device for increasing the range of motion of a tissue in a body of a patient
`set forth in claim 1, wherein the drive assembly is operable to drive movement
`of the second cuff with respect to the first cuff in a first direction, and wherein
`the spring is configured to selectively apply the spring force to the second cuff
`to urge movement of the second cuff relative to the first cuff in the first
`direction.
`
`17.
`
`l have been instructed to adopt the construction of the claim terms of the ‘343
`
`patent proposed by patentee’s expert in Case No.: 1:14—cv—00609 as the “broadest reasonable”
`
`construction of those terms.
`
`18.
`
`Patentee’s expert construes the words “lockout element” to mean “an element that
`
`is designed or constructed to inhibit the relative movement of another element or part.” (Exhibit
`
`1006, pg. 44.)
`
`19.
`
`The TenoStretch (Exhibit 1008) anticipates Claim 1 of the ‘343 patent using
`
`Patentee’s analysis of this Claim (Exhibit 1007).
`
`20.
`
`Claim 1 of the ‘343 patent recites “A device for increasing the range of motion of
`
`a tissue in a body of a patient, the device comprising[.]” Using Patentee’s analysis of this Claim
`
`(Exhibit 1007) the TenoStretch (Exhibit 1008) discloses such a device.
`
`Page 5 of 9
`
`LANTZ 1009.5
`
`LANTZ 1009.5
`
`

`

`21.
`
`Claim 1 of the ‘343 patent further recites “a first cuff configured to couple to a
`
`first body portion[.]” Using Patentee’s analysis of this Claim (Exhibit 1007) the TenoStretch
`
`(Exhibit 1008) discloses this element of Claim 1 of the ‘343 patent at Exhibit K element 1.
`
`22.
`
`Claim 1 of the ‘343 patent further recites “a second cuff configured to couple to a
`
`second body portion[.]” Using Patentee’s analysis of this Claim (Exhibit 1007) the TenoStretch
`
`(Exhibit 1008) discloses this element of Claim 1 of the ‘343 patent at Exhibit K element 2.
`
`23.
`
`Claim 1 of the ‘343 patent further recites “a drive assembly operatively connected
`
`to the first and second cuffs and operable to drive movement of the second cuff with respect to
`
`the first cuff to adjust a position of the second cuff relative to the first cuff.” Using Patentee’s
`
`analysis of this Claim (Exhibit 1007) the TenoStretch (Exhibit 1008) discloses this element of
`
`Claim 1 of the ‘343 patent at Exhibit K element 3.
`
`24.
`
`Claim 1 of the “343 patent further recites “a first arm member operatively
`
`connecting the first cuff to the drive assembly[.]” Using Patentee’s analysis of this Claim
`
`(Exhibit 1007) the TenoStretch (Exhibit 1008) discloses this element of Claim 1 of the “343
`
`patent at Exhibit K element 4.
`
`25.
`
`Claim 1 of the ‘343 patent further recites “a second arm member operatively
`
`connecting the second cuff to the drive assembly, the second arm member movable with respect
`
`to the first arm member in response to the operation of the drive assembly to adjust a position of
`
`the second arm member relative to the first arm member[.]” Using Patentee’s analysis of this
`
`Claim (Exhibit 1007) the TenoStretch (Exhibit 1008) discloses this element of Claim 1 of the
`
`‘343 patent at Exhibit K element 5.
`
`26.
`
`Claim 1 of the ‘343 patent further recites “a force element operatively connected
`
`to the second arm member, the force element comprising a spring configured to apply a spring
`
`Page 6 of 9
`
`LANTZ 1009.6
`
`LANTZ 1009.6
`
`

`

`force to the second arm member to urge movement of the second arm member relative to the first
`
`arm member[.]” Using Patentee’s analysis of this Claim (Exhibit 1007) the TenoStretch (Exhibit
`
`1008) discloses this element of Claim 1 of the ‘343 patent at Exhibit K element 6.
`
`27.
`
`Claim 1 of the ‘343 patent further recites “a lockout element having a locking
`
`position and configured to selectively inhibit the spring from urging movement of the second
`
`arm member relative to the first arm member when in the locking position[.]” Using Patentee’s
`
`analysis of this Claim (Exhibit 1007) the TenoStretch (Exhibit 1008) discloses this element of
`
`Claim 1 of the ‘343 patent at Exhibit K element 7.
`
`28.
`
`Claim 1 of the ‘343 patent further recites “wherein the drive assembly is
`
`configured to selectively operate to drive movement of the second arm member with respect to
`
`the first arm member independent of the spring when the lockout element is in the locking
`
`position.” Using Patentee’s analysis of this Claim (Exhibit 1007) the TenoStretch (Exhibit 1008)
`
`discloses this element of Claim 1 of the ‘343 patent at Exhibit K where there is shown a black
`
`crank that forces the arm members to move relative to each other.
`
`29.
`
`As shown in the attached Exhibit 1007, this anticipation analysis of Claim 1 0f the
`
`“343 patent is identical to the analysis proposed by Patentee to demonstrate that Petitioner’s
`
`commercial product is covered by Claim 1 of the ‘343 patent.
`
`30.
`
`The TenoStretch (Exhibit 1008) anticipates Claim 2 of the ‘343 patent using
`
`Patentee’s analysis of this Claim (Exhibit 1007).
`
`31.
`
`Claim 2 of the ‘343 patent further recites “[a] device for increasing the range of
`
`motion of a tissue in a body of a patient set forth in claim 1, wherein the drive assembly imparts
`
`movement of the spring relative to the first cuff in response to operation of the drive assembly in
`
`driving movement of the second cuff with respect to the first cuffI.]” Using Patentee’s analysis
`
`Page 7 of‘)
`
`LANTZ 1009.7
`
`LANTZ 1009.7
`
`

`

`of this Claim (Exhibit 1007) the TenoStretch (Exhibit 1008) discloses this element of Claim 2 of
`
`the ‘343 patent in Exhibit K element 3.
`
`32.
`
`As shown in the attached Exhibit 1007, this anticipation analysis of Claim 2 of the
`
`‘343 patent is identical to the analysis proposed by Patentee to demonstrate that Petitioner’s
`
`commercial product is covered by Claim 2 of the ‘343 patent.
`
`33.
`
`The TenoStretch (Exhibit 1008) anticipates Claim 3 of the “343 patent using
`
`Patentee’s analysis of this Claim (Exhibit 1007).
`
`34.
`
`Claim 3 of the ‘343 patent further recites “[a] device for increasing the range of
`
`motion of a tissue in a body of a patient set forth in claim 1, wherein the drive assembly
`
`comprises a worm and a gear engaging the worm.” Using Patentee’s analysis of this Claim
`
`(Exhibit 1007) the TenoStretch (Exhibit 1008) discloses this element of Claim 3 of the ‘343 in
`
`Exhibit K elements 8 and 9.
`
`35.
`
`As shown in the attached Exhibit 1007, this anticipation analysis of Claim 3 of the
`
`‘343 patent is identical to the analysis proposed by Patentee to demonstrate that Petitioner’s
`
`commercial product is covered by Claim 3 of the ‘343 patent.
`
`36.
`
`The TenoStretch (Exhibit 1008) anticipates Claim 4 of the ‘343 patent using
`
`Patentee’s analysis of this Claim (Exhibit 1007).
`
`37.
`
`Claim 4 of the ‘343 patent further recites “[a] device for increasing the range of
`
`motion of a tissue in a body of a patient set forth in claim 1, wherein the drive assembly is
`
`operable to drive movement of the second cuff with respect to the first cuff in a first direction,
`
`and wherein the spring is configured to selectively apply the spring force to the second cuff to
`
`urge movement of the second cuff relative to the first cuff in the first direction.” Using
`
`Page 8 of‘)
`
`LANTZ 1009.8
`
`LANTZ 1009.8
`
`

`

`Patentee’s analysis of this Claim (Exhibit 1007) the TenoStretch (Exhibit 1008) functions in
`
`exactly this manner.
`
`38.
`
`As shown in the attached Exhibit l007, this anticipation analysis of Claim 4 of the
`
`‘343 patent is identical to the analysis proposed by Patentee to demonstrate that Petitioner’s
`
`commercial product is covered by Claim 4 of the ‘343 patent.
`
`I understand that the foregoing representations are made under the pains and penalties of
`
`perjury.
`
`FURTHER AFFIANT SAYETH NAUGHT.
`
`Date: Hz ”‘5 WW
`
`
`
`Renee D Rogge Ph D.
`
`Page 9 of 9
`
`LANTZ 1009.9
`
`
`
`LANTZ 1009.9
`
`

`

`CM 4032, 5500 Wabash Ave.
`Terre Haute, IN 47803
`
`Phone: (812) 877-8505
`rogge@rose—hulman.edu
`
`Renee D. Rogge
`
`Education
`
`1996 — 2000
`
`University of Iowa
`
`Iowa City, Iowa
`
`College of Engineering
`
`0 PhD. in Biomedical Engineering w Biomechanics of Distal Radius Fractures:
`Factors Influencing Stability (July 2000)
`Advisors: Brian D. Adams, MD. and Vijay K. Goel, Ph.D.
`Aging Studies Program
`
`0 Certificate in Aging Studies (July 2000)
`
`1992 — 1996
`
`Tulane University
`
`New Orleans, Louisiana
`
`College of Engineering
`
`0 BS. in Biomedical Engineering
`I Minor in Mechanical Engineering
`
`Experience
`
`July 201 l — June 2012 Joint Replacement Surgeons of Indiana Research Foundation
`
`0 Development and validation of computational models of the hip and knee
`
`July 2004 - Present
`
`Rose—Hulman Institute of Technology Terre Haute, IN
`
`Associate Professor in Applied Biology & Biomedical Engineering (2010 - )
`
`Assistant Professor in Applied Biology & Biomedical Engineering (2004 -10)
`
`0 Teaching Senior Design, Graphical Communications, Biomechanics,
`Orthopaedic Biomechanics, Bone Biomechanics; advising undergraduate
`students in Biomedical Engineering
`
`July 2000 — July 2004 Mercer University
`
`Macon, GA
`
`Assistant Professor in Biomedical Engineering
`
`0 Teaching Statics & Mechanics of Materials, Biomechanics (senior—level
`biomedical engineering course), Calculus I laboratory, Dynamics of
`Biological Fluids, Biomaterials, and Advanced Biomechanics
`
`Summer 2002 & 2003 Johnson Space Center
`
`Houston, TX
`
`Summer Faculty Fellow, Anthropometry & Biomechanics Facility
`
`' Developed a three-dimensional kinematic model using data acquired
`from 3-D body surface scans to assess shoulder impingement during
`extravehicular activities.
`
`1996 — 2000
`Research Assistant
`
`University of Iowa
`
`Iowa City, Iowa
`
`0 Developed mathematical models, conducted cadaveric experiments,
`analyzed theoretical and experimental data, and assisted undergraduate
`students in design projects.
`
`Fall 1998, Spring 2000 University of Iowa
`
`Iowa City, Iowa
`
`Teaching Assistant
`
`
`
`LANTZ 1009.10
`
`

`

`0 Conducted discussion sections for Mechanics of Deformable Bodies/
`
`Dynamics to assist students in working problems, formulated
`examinations/quizzes, and graded exams/quizzes.
`
`Publications
`
`Tokunaga S*, Rogge RD#, Small SR, Berend ME, Ritter MA. Metal Backing and
`Resection Depth as Factors in Tibial Loading Following TICK: A Finite Element Study.
`zl/Iedit‘cz/ Eligifleel‘iiig C“ Plg'ria‘ (Submitted « Under Revision)
`
`Berend ME, Small SR, Howard D”, Rogge RD#. Buckley CA#, Ritter MA. High
`Initial Stability in Porous Titanium Acetabular Cups: A Biomechanical Study — fol/ma/ 0f
`ArtZirop/mg' (Submitted — Under Revision)
`
`Howe, S., Caves, K., Kleiner, C., Livesay, G., Norback, J.S., Rogge, R., Turner, C.,
`and T. Utschig. Nifty Ideas and Surprising Flops in Capstone Design Education.
`International Journal of Engineering Education 27(6): 1-12, 201 1.
`
`Small, S.R., Berend, M..E, Ritter, M.A., Buckley, CA, and RD. Rogge. Metal
`Backing Significantly Decreases Tibial Strains
`in Unicompartmental Knee
`Arthroplasty. Journal of Arthroplasty 26(5):777—82, 201 1.
`
`Livesay,G., Rogge, R., and KC Dee. Development of a Supplemental Evaluation for
`Engineering Design Courses. Advances in Engineering Education 2(1):1—14, 2010.
`
`*Harrigan, K., *Logan, R., *Sluti, A., and R. Rogge. "Instrumented Sparring Vest to
`Aid in Martial Arts Scoring," Biomedical Sciences Instrumentation 42:211—16, 2006.
`*Student authors.
`
`Rogge, R. "Development of a Digital Human Model using Whole Body Scanning
`Technology," NASA Tech Briefs, 2008.
`
`Grosland, N.M., Rogge, R.D., and ED. Adams. Influence of Articular Geometry on
`Prosthetic Wrist Stability. Clinical Orthopedics 421:134—42, 2004.
`
`Rogge, R.D., Adams, B.D., & V.K. Goel. An analysis of bone stresses and fixation
`stability using a finite element model of simulated distal radius fractures. J Hand
`Surgery 27A286-92, 2002.
`
`Abstracts,
`Technical
`
`Paper-$81
`(20"wa
`Proceedmgs
`
`Rogge RD#, Tokunaga 3*, Small SR, Berend ME, Ritter MA. The Influence of
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`Bone Resection Depth on Tibial Loading. 2072 Olfbopaedzc Kermit/J 50618f] Amma/Meeting
`
`Archer 1313+, Kingman AL+, Hughes KR+, Small SR, Rogge RD#, Berend ME,
`Ritter MA. Biomechanical Assessment of Tibial Component Slope in
`Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty. 2011 Bioli/edz'a‘a/ E/{gmeei‘i/zg 50(7‘90' Allmm/Fa/l
`Alerting
`
`Berend ME, Small SR, *Howard LA, Rogge RD, Buckley CA, Ritter MA. “High
`Initial Stability in Porous Titanium Acetabular Cup Designs: A Biomechanical
`Study”, Accepted for the 2010 Annual Biomedical Engineering Society Meeting.
`
`Rogge 2/6
`
`LANTZ 1009.11
`
`LANTZ 1009.11
`
`

`

`*Tokunaga S, Small SR, Berend ME, Rogge RD, Ritter MA. “Factors Influencing
`Tibial Loading Following Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Finite Element Study”,
`Biomedical Engineering Society Meeting, Austin, Oct 2010.
`
`Small SR, Berend ME, Ritter MA, Buckley CA, and Rogge RD. Metal Backing
`Significantly Decreases Tibial Strains in Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty.
`American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons, Dallas, Oct 2009.
`
`"Development of an Evaluation Tool for
`Rogge, R., Livesay, G., and Dee, K.
`Assessing Student Practices, Independence, and Responsibility in Design Courses,"
`Proceedings of the 2009 Annual ASEE Conference. (Best Paper Award in the Design
`in Education Division)
`
`*Volitich M, *Younger SM, Small SR, Buckley CA, Rogge RD, and Berend ME.
`Strain in the Medial Tibia with Fixed All-Polyethylene Bearings in Unicompartmental
`Knee Arthroplasty. Poster Presentation to the Biomedical Engineering Annual Fall
`Meeting; Pittsburg, Oct 2009.
`
`*Volitich M, Small SR, Buckley CA, Rogge RD, Berend ME. Comparison of
`Photoelastic and Strain Gage Evaluation Techniques in an Orthopaedic Model. Poster
`Presentation to the Biomedical Engineering Society Annual Fall Meeting; Pittsburg,
`Oct 2009.
`
`"A Fall Simulator to Investigate the
`*Santoso, A., *Steward, A., and R. Rogge.
`Efficacy of Personal Protective Equipment," Proceedings of
`the 2009 Injury
`Biomechanics Symposium at Ohio State.
`
`*Baker, R., *Horton, K., *Varatharaj, A., *Wagner, Z. and R. Rogge. "Design and
`Construction of a Device to Investigate Head Trauma," Proceedings of the 2009
`ASEE IL/IN Conference. (*Student author, 1SI Place - Student Poster Competition)
`
`*Gregory, E., >“Sheets, S., *Witten, B. and R. Ragge. “Comparison of Elbow Joint
`Angles for Male and Female Bat Swings,” Proceedings of the ASME 2008 Summer
`Bioengineering Conference (SBC2008)
`(*Student author,
`independent
`research
`project.)
`
`*Dick, 8., *Maynard, S, and R. Rogge. “Repetitive Stress Injuries Research Device,”
`Proceedings of the 2008 ASEE IL/IN Section Conference (*Student author, 1St Place —
`Student Poster Competition)
`
`*Sheridan, D., Rogge, R.D., and Livesay, G.A.: Testing of the impact characteristics
`of personal protective devices, Submitted for presentation at
`the ASME Summer
`Bioengineering Conference, Keystone, CO, June 20-24, 2007. (*Student author)
`
`J. Williams, A. Chidanandan, P. Coppinger, D. Fisher, M. Hirotani, R. Rogge, S.
`Sexton, M. Simoni, K. Sutterer, and D. Walter, “Measuring The Impact Of Tablet Pcs
`And Dyknow Vision Software On Students’ Note-Taking Strategies: A Cross—
`Disciplinary Case Study,” in The Impact of Tablet PCs and Pen-based Technology on
`Education 2008, ed. I. Prey, R. Reed, and D. Berque, Purdue University Press, 2008.
`
`Dee, K.C., Livesay, GA, and Rogge, R.D.: Development of a supplemental course
`evaluation for capstone design, National Capstone Design Course Conference,
`
`Rogge 3/6
`
`LANTZ 1009.12
`
`LANTZ 1009.12
`
`

`

`Boulder, CO, June 13—15, 2007. (*Won best paper honors)
`
`“A Practical Approach to ‘Closing the Loop’ in
`Livesay, GA. and R.D. Rogge.
`Biomedical Engineering Design". Proceedings of the BMES 2006 Meeting.
`
`Rogge, RD. and GA. Livesay. “Design Bootcamp: Getting in Shape for a Capstone
`Experience,” Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference (2006).
`
`Livesay, G.A. & R.D. Rogge. “Vertical Mentoring: Closing the Loop in Design,”
`Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference (2006).
`
`Rogge, R., *Chappell, A., & S. Rajulu. “Development and Validation of a Digital
`Human Model for Space Hardware Design and Evaluation,” SAE Digital Human
`Modeling Conference: 2005, Iowa City, IA. (*Student co-author)
`
`Sumner, L.B. & R.D. Rogge. “Teaching with Technology: A Strategy for Pedagogy
`and Practicality using CAE Software,” ASEE Conference: 2005, Portland, OR.
`
`Rogge, R.D., Sumner, L.B., & J. Burtner. "Formative Assessment of a Computer—
`Aided Analysis Center: Plan Development and Preliminary Results," FIE: 2004,
`Savannah, GA.
`
`Rogge, R.D. "A Student—led Approach to Teaching Advanced Biomechanics,"
`Proceedings of the ASEE-Southeastern Section Meeting, April 2004.
`
`Grosland, NM Rogge, R.D., & B.D. Adams. ”Influence of articular geometry on
`prosthetic wrist stability," in American Society of Biomechanics Conference
`Proceedings. ASB: 2003,Toledo, OH.
`
`Grosland, NM., Rogge, R.D., Adams, B.D., & T.D. Brown. "Rotational dislocation
`resistance of a dual-curvature-radius total wrist implant," in Transactions of the
`Orthopaedic Research Society (Vol. 28). ORS: 2003, New Orleans, LA.
`
`Burtner, J .M. and RD. Rogge. "Faculty advisors' management style and the
`development of students' leadership capabilities," in the Annual ASEE National
`Conference Proceedings. ASEE-National: 2003, Nashville, TN.
`
`Rogge, RD. and J.M. Burtner. "Case study in management style and leadership roles
`of faculty advisors to students organizations," in the Annual ASEE—Southeastern
`Conference Proceedings. ASEE—SE: 2003, Macon, GA.
`
`Rogge, R.D., Adams, B.D., Grosland, N.M., & V.K. Goel. "A finite element model
`to assess distal radius fracture stability," in the Annual International Conference of the
`IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Proceedings (Vol. 3). EMBS: 2002,
`Houston, TX.
`
`O'Brien, E.M. & R.D. Rogge. "LabView usage as part of the biomedical engineering
`senior design experience," in the Annual International Conference of the IEEE
`Engineering in Medicine and Biology Proceedings (Vol. 3). EMBS: 2002, Houston,
`TX.
`
`Rogge, R.D., Grosland, N.M., Goel, V.K. & B.D. Adams. "Influence of site and
`
`Rogge 4/6
`
`LANTZ 1009.13
`
`LANTZ 1009.13
`
`

`

`severity of comminution on extra-articular distal radius fracture stability," in
`American Society of Biomechanics/World Congress of Biomechanics Joint Meeting
`Conference Proceedings. 2002, ASB: Calgary, Canada.
`
`Barnett, SK. & R.D. Rogge. "Journal article critiques: a complement to upper—level
`engineering courses," in the ASEE-Southeastern Section Conference Proceedings.
`2002, ASEE—SE: Gainesville, FL.
`
`R.D. Rogge. "Integrating finite element analysis into an undergraduate biomechanics
`course," in the ASEE—National Conference Proceedings. 2002, ASHE-National:
`Montreal, Canada.
`
`Grosland, N.M., Rogge, R.D., Brown, TD. and ED. Adams. "Rotational dislocation
`propensity of an unconstrained total wrist implant," in the American Society of
`Biomechanics Proceedings. ASB: 2001, San Diego, CA.
`
`" Influence of articular geometry on
`Grosland, N.M., Ragge, R.D, & B.D. Adams.
`prosthetic wrist stability," in Transactions of the Orthopaedic Research Society (Vol.
`26). ORS: 2001, San Francisco, CA.
`
`Listed under Renee D. Heatherly:
`
`Heatherly, R.D., Grosland, N .M., Goel, V.K., & B.D. Adams. "A finite element
`
`analysis of distal radius fracture instability," in the Computational Methods in
`Orthopaedic Biomechanics Proceedings. Pre—ORS: 2000, Orlando, FL.
`
`Heatherly, R.D., Adams, B.D., & V.K. Goel. (June 1999) An evaluation of distal
`radius fracture pinning techniques using an experimentally validated FE model.
`ASME 1999 Summer Bioengineering Conference, Big Sky, MT.
`
`Heatherly, R.D., Adams, B.D., & V.K. Goel. (February 1999) Development and
`validation of a three-dimensional finite element model of the distal radius.
`
`Orthopaedic Research Society, Anaheim, CA.
`
`Heatherly, R.D., Adams, B.D., & V.K. Goel. (February 1998) Stress distribution in
`various pinning techniques usinga finite element model. American Academy of
`Orthopaedic Surgeons, New Orleans, LA.
`
`Adams, B.D., Heatherly, R.D., & V.K. Goel. (September 1998) Development and
`validation of a three-dimensional finite element of the distal radius. Third Triennial
`
`International Hand and Wrist Biomechanics Symposium, Minneapolis, MN.
`
`contra“ or
`Grant Activities
`
`"MRI: Acquisition of a Biomechanics Biaxial Materials Testing and Measurement System”
`funded by the NSF. Co-PI: Dr. Christine Buckley. $335,309 (2010—2013)
`
`“Biomedical Engineerng Senior Design Projects: Design & Implementation of
`Assistive Technology for People with Disabilities” funded by the NSF (Research to
`Aid Persons with Disabilities). Co-PIs: Dr. Glen Livesay & Dr. Fred Berry.
`$127,000 (2008-2013)
`
`Summer Faculty Development Grant ($5000) for "Development of an Upper
`
`Rogge 5/6
`
`LANTZ 1009.14
`
`LANTZ 1009.14
`
`

`

`Extremity Model for Investigating Fall and Fracture Mechanics"
`
`Weaver Research Award ($2500) for Michael Volitich ("Comparison of Photoelastic
`and Strain Gage Measurement Techniques in a Total Joint Replacement
`Biomechanics Model")
`
`- Award to develop classroom teaching
`HP Tablet PC/DyKnow Project Proposal
`techniques in Biomechanics using the Tablet PC and DyKnow.
`
`W.M. Keck Foundation ($340,000) - Award to develop computational engineering
`analysis facility at Mercer University School of Engineering (2002—2005). (Co—PI:
`Loren Sumner)
`
`NASA—Johnson Space Center ($16,993) — Award to develop a 3-D representation of
`suited and unsuited astronauts for use in design and development of space hardware
`(2003-2004).
`
`Ford Motor Company & Society of Women Engineers ($3400) —— Award to conduct
`three workshops illustrating the various applications of engineering to high school
`girls (2001-2002). (Co—P1: Joan Burtner)
`
`Awards
`
`$335,309 grant from the National Science Foundation to expand biomechanical
`instrumentation for undergraduate research projects in orthopedics that could lead to
`the development of improved, cost effective design alternatives for knee and hip
`implants.
`
`ASEE Design in Engineering Education Division Best Paper Award, 2009 Meeting
`
`2009 NASA Tech Brief Award for publication on Digital Human Modeling
`
`Recipient of the Edward T. Edwards Award from the Knox County ARC. This
`award is presented to an individual or organization which has made a contribution
`that resulted in improved opportunities for people with disabilities. Awarded 5 times
`in the last 27 years.
`
`2006 National Scholar Award for Workplace Innovation and Design w worked with
`students in senior design who won a $10,000 award for their individual efforts.
`Rose—Hulman was awarded a $10,000 matching award to be used in BE senior design
`projects.
`
`Organizational
`'nVOIVemem
`
`I was
`I am an active member of the American Society for Engineering Education.
`the 2010 Program Chair for the Design in Engineering Education Division (DEED).
`1 am serving as the Treasurer/Secretary for the 2010-201 1 year. As an active
`participant in this division, I played an integral role in the development of a
`“Financial Assistance Program” that provides seed money for student design teams
`that are developing innovation solutions to assistive technology challenges. This
`program is supported by DEED and NISH, an organization that works to employ
`people with disabilities in the workplace.
`1 have been the chair for this program for 3
`
`Rogge 6/6
`
`LANTZ 1009.15
`
`LANTZ 1009.15
`
`

`

`Research
`Interests
`
`Teaching
`Experience
`
`years and have awarded seed grants totaling over $20,000 to ~ 45 teams.
`
`_
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`I am actively involved in the Orthopaedic Biomechamcs Laboratory (OBL) at Rose—
`Hulman. The OBL is a collaboration between the Joint Replacement Surgeons of
`Indiana (JRSI) Research Foundation, based at the Center for Hip & Knee Surgery in
`Mooresville, IN and Rose—Hulman Institute of Technology. The program was
`established to provide undergraduate and graduate engineering students at Rose—
`Hulman with valuable research opportunities in the field of orthopaedics.
`
`I have been a professional educator for 10 years and thoroughly enjoy the experience.
`As a faculty member at an undergraduate-focused institution, I typically teach three
`courses each quarter.
`I have developed and taught courses in biomechanics, bone
`biomechanics, orthopaedic biomechanics, biomedical engineering labor