DECLARATION OF RENEE D. ROGGE, Ph.D.
`
`Renee D. Rogge, Ph.D., being duly sworn upon her oath, alleges and says as follows:
`
`1.
`
`I am over eighteen years old and have personal knowledge of the matters set foith
`
`in this Declaration.
`
`2.
`
`I am a Professor in Biomedical Engineering and the current Samuel F. Hulbert
`
`Chair of Biomedical Engineering at Rose—Hulman Institute of Technology.
`
`I hold degrees in
`
`Biomedical Engineering from Tulane University (1996, BS.) and the University of Iowa (2000,
`
`Ph.D.). My dissertation research focused on the development and Validation of a finite element
`
`model of the distal forearm for investigating distal radius fractures and treatment techniques. My
`
`curriculum Vitae is attached as Exhibit “A” and provides additional details regarding my
`
`publication and research history.
`
`3.
`
`I am a member of the American Society for Engineering Education and served as
`
`a member of the Design in Engineering Education Division from 2006-2012.
`
`I have been
`
`teaching engineering students at the undergraduate level since 2000.
`
`I teach courses in Graphical
`
`Communications (i.e. Solid Works modeling), Statics and Mechanics of Materials, Conservation
`
`and Accounting Principles (an engineering dynamics course), Biomedical Engineering Labs,
`
`Orthopaedic Biomechanics, Bone Biomechanics, Research Methods in Biomechanics, and the
`
`Capstone Design sequence in Biomedical Engineering. My research experience and interests
`
`include implant design and the use of experimental and finite element analysis techniques.
`
`4.
`
`I have been instructed that in order to determine whether a product, process, or
`
`article of manufacture infringes a U.S. patent, the court looks to the claims of the patent. For
`
`each claim,
`
`there is two step inquiry. First,
`
`the court resolves a dispute as the meaning of
`
`particular claim terminology by construing the language of each relevant claim. Second, the
`
`l3o0274
`
`Lantz Medical, Inc.
`Exhibit # 1010
`
`

`
`properly construed claims are compared to the accused product, process, or article of
`
`manufacture. Mas—Hamilr0n Group v. LaGard, Inc. 156 F.3d 1206 (Fed. Cir. 1998).
`
`5.
`
`I have been instructed that “Patent claims should be construed as they would be
`
`by those skilled in the art.” Multiform Desiccants. Inc. V. Medzam, Ltd., 133 F.3d 1473. “To
`
`ascertain the true meaning of the claims, it is appropriate to consider the claim language, the
`
`patent specification, and the prosecution history.” Markman v. Wesrview Instruments. Inc., 52
`
`F.3d 967. “Dictionaries may be used to help the court understand the claim language.” EM]
`
`Group N. Am, Inc. v. Intel Corp, 157 F.3d 887. According to 35 U.S.C. §112, paragraph 6,
`
`“means plus function terminology should be construed to cover only the corresponding structure
`
`described in the patent specification.” Valmont Industries, Inc. V. Reinke Mfg. Co., 983 F.2d
`
`1039.
`
`6.
`
`I have been instructed that claim terms should be defined as they would by one of
`
`ordinary skill
`
`in the art. Teleflex,
`
`Inc. Ficosa N. Am. C0rp.,299 F.3d 1313. However,
`
`the
`
`patentee, acting as his or her own lexicographer, may override any such ordinary definition by
`
`clearly setting forth in the patent a unique definition for a disputed term. Alloc. Inc. v. Int '1 Trade
`
`Comm 'n., 342 F.3d 1361.
`
`7.
`
`I have been instructed that claim construction depends first and foremost on
`
`intrinsic evidence. Extrinsic evidence should be used only if the intrinsic evidence is insufficient
`
`to define the claims and never if it contradicts intrinsic evidence. See, for example, ViI‘ri0nics
`
`Corp. v. Conception, Inc., 90 F .3d 1576 (Fed. Cir. 1996) and Digital Biometrics, Inc. v. Idenfix.
`
`Inc, 149 F.3d 1335 (Fed. Cir. 1998).
`
`LANTZ 1010.2
`
`

`
`8.
`
`I have been instructed that claim terms should be interpreted such that a
`
`difference in meaning is presumed between claims that use different words or phrases. Comark
`
`Communications‘, Inc. v. Harris Corp., 156 F.3d 1182.
`
`9.
`
`l have been instructed that where the claims of a patent are narrowed by
`
`amendment during prosecution of the claims before the USPTO, patentee is estopped from
`
`asserting that the scope of the amended claims covered the abandoned subject matter. Festo
`
`Corp. v. Slzoketsu Kinzoku Kogyo Kabushki Co., 535 U.S. 722 (2002).
`
`10.
`
`1 have been instructed that under 35 U.S.C. § 102, a claim is anticipated, and
`
`therefore invalid, when a single prior art reference discloses each and every element of the
`
`claimed invention. Structural Rubber Prods. Co. v. Park Rubber Co., 749 F.2d 707, 715, 223
`
`U.S.P.Q. 1264, 1270 (Fed. Cir. 1984).
`
`11.
`
`1 have been instructed that a petitioner’s burden before the USPTO is limited to
`
`proving invalidity of any relevant claims by a preponderance of the evidence. SAP America, Inc.
`
`v. Versata Development Group, Inc. (CBM2012-00001), referencing 35 U.S.C. § 326(e).
`
`12.
`
`1 have been instructed that in matters before the USPTO and the Patent Trial and
`
`Appeal Board, patent claims are construed according to their broadest reasonable interpretation.
`
`SAP America. Inc. v. Versata Development Group, Inc. (CBM2012-00001).
`
`13.
`
`The references that 1 reviewed in preparation of this Declaration are:
`
`a.
`
`U.S. Patent No. 7,112,179 (previously marked as Exhibit 1001 of the ‘179
`
`IPR);
`
`b.
`
`Prosecution History of U.S. Patent No. 7,112,179 (previously marked as
`
`Exhibit 1002 of the ‘179 IPR);
`
`LANTZ 1010.3
`
`

`
`c.
`
`Expert report of Marta L. Villarraga, Ph.D. (previously marked as Exhibit
`
`1006 of the ‘ 179 IPR);
`
`d.
`
`Patentee’s
`
`Infringement Contentions
`
`for Case No.:
`
`1:14-cv-00609
`
`(previously marked as Exhibit 1007 of the ‘179 IRP);
`
`e.
`
`U.S. Patent No. 5,759,165 (previously marked as Exhibit 1008 of the ‘179
`
`IPR); and
`
`f.
`
`U.S. Patent No. 2,832,334 (previously marked as Exhibit 1009 of the ‘179
`
`IPR)
`
`14.
`
`Based on the technologies disclosed, it is my opinion that a person of ordinary
`
`skill in the art at the time of US. Patent No. ‘179 would be an occupational therapist, physical
`
`therapist, mechanical engineer, and/or biomedical engineer with three to five years of experience
`
`designing or evaluating the design of orthotics.
`
`15.
`
`The ‘179 patent issued from U.S. Patent Application Serial Number 10/795,892.
`
`The earliest effective filing date of the ‘179 patent is March 8, 2004. The ‘179 Patent includes
`
`four (4) independent claims and twenty- four (24) dependent claims. The independent claim at
`
`issue is claim 26 (originally filed as claim 16). During prosecution, the claim was considered to
`
`be allowable if changed to independent form. In response, the claim was changed to independent
`
`form.
`
`16.
`
`Claim 26 of the‘179 Patent states, “[a]n orthosis for stretching tissue around a
`
`joint of a patient between first and second relatively pivotable body portions, comprising: a first
`
`arm member affixable to the first body portion and including a first extension member extending
`
`therefrom; a second arm member affixable to the second body portion and including a second
`
`extension member having an arcuate shape extending therefrom, the second extension member is
`
`LANTZ 1010.4
`
`

`
`operatively connected to the first extension member and travels along an arcuate path through the
`
`first extension member when the second arm member is moved from a first position to a second
`
`position relative to the first arm member; and a hand pad attached to the second arm member,
`
`wherein the hand pad is slidably mounted to the second arm member.”
`
`17.
`
`I have been instructed to adopt the construction of the claim terms of the ‘l79
`
`patent proposed by patentee’s expert in Case No.: l:l4-cv-00609 as the “broadest reasonable”
`
`construction of those terms.
`
`18.
`
`Patentee’s expert construed the claim terms of the ‘l79 patent as follows:
`
`a.
`
`“first extension member” to mean “any part that extends fi‘om the first
`
`arm member.” (Exhibit 1006, pg. 20)
`
`b.
`
`“second extension member having an arcuate shape extending therefrom”
`
`to mean “any part that is wholly or partially non-linear and that extends from the second
`
`arm member.” (Exhibit 1006, pg. 21)
`
`c.
`
`“arcuate shape” to mean “non-linear structure such as a bow, circle, wave,
`
`or combination thereof.” (Exhibit l006, pg. 23)
`
`d.
`
`“arcuate path” to mean “a non-linear path in the shape of a bow, circle,
`
`wave, or combination thereof.” (Exhibit 1006, pg. 25)
`
`e.
`
`“travels along an arcuate path through the first extension member” to
`
`mean “travels in a non-linear path relative to another piece.” (Exhibit 1006, pg. 26)
`
`19.
`
`U.S. Patent No. 5,759,165 (“the ‘ l65 patent”) (Exhibit 1008) anticipates Claim 26
`
`of the ‘179 Patent using Patentee’s analysis of this Claim (Exhibit 1007).
`
`20.
`
`Claim 26 of the ‘N9 patent recites “[a]n orthosis for stretching tissue around a
`3
`joint of a patient between first and second relatively pivotable body portions.’ Using Patentee’s
`
`LANTZ 1010.5
`
`

`
`analysis of this Claim (Exhibit 1007), the ‘l65 patent (Exhibit 1008) discloses this element of
`
`Claim 26 of the ‘179 patent in the Abstract.
`
`21.
`
`Claim 26 of the ‘179 patent further recites “a first arm member affixable to the
`
`first body portion.” Using Patentee’s analysis of this Claim (Exhibit 1007) the ‘165 patent
`
`(Exhibit 1008) discloses this element of Claim 26 of the ‘179 Patent at Col. 3, Lines 20-21 and in
`
`Fig. 3(20).
`
`22.
`
`Claim 26 of the ‘179 patent further recites an orthosis device “including a first
`3?
`extension member extending [from the first arm member]. Using Patentee’s analysis of this
`
`Claim (Exhibit 1007) the ‘I65 patent (Exhibit 1008) discloses this element of Claim 26 of the
`
`‘179 patent at Col. 3, Lines 20-21 and in Fig. 3(22).
`
`23.
`
`Claim 26 of the ‘ 179 patent further recites an orthosis device with “a second arm
`9
`member affixable to the second body portion.’ Using Patentee’s analysis of this Claim (Exhibit
`
`1007) the ‘165 patent (Exhibit 1008) discloses this element of Claim 26 of the ‘179 patent at Col.
`
`4, Lines 26-27 and in Fig. 3(46)(48).
`
`24.
`
`Claim 26 of the ‘179 patent further recites an orthosis device “.
`7
`second extension member having an arcuate shape extending therefrom.’ Using Patentee’s
`
`.
`
`. including a
`
`analysis of this Claim (Exhibit 1007) the ‘165 patent (Exhibit 1008) discloses this element of
`
`Claim 26 ofthe ‘179 patent at Col. 4, Lines 52-57; Col. 5, Lines 1-10; and Figs. 5, 6, and 7(56).
`
`25.
`
`Claim 26 of the ‘179 patent further recites an orthosis device where “the second
`
`extension member is operatively connected to the first extension member and travels along an
`
`arcuate path through the first extension member when the second arm member is moved from a
`
`first position to a second position relative to the first arm member.” Using Patentee’s analysis of
`
`LANTZ 1010.6
`
`

`
`this Claim (Exhibit 1007) the ‘165 patent (Exhibit 1008) discloses this element of Claim 26 of
`
`the ‘179 patent at Col.5, Lines 1-2 and in Fig. 5(c).
`
`26.
`
`Claim 26 of the ‘179 patent further recites an orthosis device having “a hand pad
`
`attached to the second arm member, wherein the hand pad is slidably mounted to the second arm
`
`member.” Using Patentee’s analysis of this Claim (Exhibit 1007) the ‘ 165 patent (Exhibit 1008)
`
`discloses this element of Claim 26 of the ‘179 patent at Col.3, Lines 41-50 and Fig.
`
`1(14)(12)(16)(l8).
`
`27.
`
`As shown in the attached Exhibit 1007, this anticipation analysis of claim 26 of
`
`the ‘179 patent is identical to the analysis proposed by Patentee to demonstrate that Petitioner’s
`
`commercial product is covered by claim 26 of the ‘179 patent.
`
`28.
`
`U.S. Patent No. 2,832,334 (“the ‘334 patent”) (Exhibit 1009) anticipates Claim 26
`
`of the ‘ 179 Patent using Patentee’s analysis of this Claim (Exhibit 1007).
`
`29.
`
`Claim 26 of the ‘179 patent recites “[a]n orthosis for stretching tissue around a
`
`joint of a patient between first and second relatively pivotable body portions.” Using Patentee’s
`
`analysis of this Claim (Exhibit 1007) the ‘334 patent (Exhibit 1009) discloses this element of
`
`Claim 26 of the ‘ 179 patent in the title of Exhibit 1009.
`
`30.
`
`Claim 26 of the ‘179 patent further recites “a first arm member affixable to the
`
`first body portion.” Using Patentee’s analysis of this Claim (Exhibit 1007) the ‘334 patent
`
`(Exhibit 1009) discloses this element of Claim 26 of the ‘179 patent at Col. 2, Lines 14-15 and
`
`Fig. 1(11).
`
`31.
`
`Claim 26 of the ‘179 patent further recites an orthosis device “including a first
`
`extension member extending [from the first arm member].” Using Patentee’s analysis of this
`
`LANTZ 1010.7
`
`

`
`Claim (Exhibit 1007) the ‘334 patent (Exhibit 1009) discloses this element of Claim 26 of the
`
`‘179 patent at Col. 3, Lines 36-37 and Fig. 1(28).
`
`32.
`
`Claim 26 of the ‘179 patent further recites an orthosis device with “a second arm
`
`member affixable to the second body portion.” Using Patentee’s analysis of this Claim (Exhibit
`
`1007) the ‘334 patent (Exhibit 1009) discloses this element of Claim 26 of the ‘ 179 patent at Col.
`
`2, Lines 14-15 and Fig. l(lO) and Fig. 2(10).
`
`33.
`
`Claim 26 of the ‘179 patent further recites an orthosis device “.
`
`.
`
`. including a
`
`second extension member having an arcuate shape extending therefrom.” Using Patentee’s
`
`analysis of this Claim (Exhibit 1007) the ‘334 patent (Exhibit 1009) discloses this element of
`
`Claim 26 of the ‘179 patent at Fig. 1(29), Fig. 2(29), Fig. 3(29), and Fig. 4(29).
`
`34.
`
`Claim 26 of the ‘179 patent further recites an orthosis device where “the second
`
`extension member is operatively connected to the first extension member and travels along an
`
`arcuate path through the first extension member when the second arm member is moved from a
`
`first position to a second position relative to the first arm member.” Using Patentee’s analysis of
`
`this Claim (Exhibit 1007) the ‘334 patent (Exhibit 1009) discloses this element of Claim 26 of
`
`the ‘179 patent at Col. 3, Lines 14-17 and Figs. 1, 2, and 3.
`
`35.
`
`Claim 26 of the ‘179 patent further recites an orthosis device having “a hand pad
`
`attached to the second arm member, wherein the hand pad is slidably mounted to the second arm
`
`member.” Using Patentee’s analysis of this Claim (Exhibit 1007) the ‘334 patent (Exhibit 1009)
`
`discloses this element of Claim 26 of the ‘179 at Col. 2, Lines 14-26 and Fig. 1(24), and Fig.
`
`3(24a).
`
`LANTZ 1010.8
`
`

`
`36.
`
`As shown in the attached Exhibit 1007, this anticipation analysis of claim 26 of
`
`the ‘179 patent is identical to the analysis prepared by Patentee to demonstrate that Petitionefs
`
`commercial product is covered by Claim 26 of the ‘ 179 patent.
`
`I understand that the foregoing representations are made under the pains and penalties of
`
`perjury.
`
`FURTHER AFFIANT SAYETH NAUGHT.
`
`Date:LiHH5
`
`__
`
`ReneeD. Rogge, Ph
`
`LANTZ 1010.9
`
`

`
`CM 4032, 5500 Wabash Ave.
`Terre Haute, IN 47803
`
`Phone: (812) 877-8505
`rogge@rose—hu1man.edu
`
`Renee D. Rogge
`
`Education
`
`1996 ~ 2000
`
`University of Iowa
`
`Iowa City, Iowa
`
`College of Engineering
`
`0 Ph.D. in Biomedical Engineering — Biomechanics of Distal Radius Fractures:
`Factors Influencing Stability (July 2000)
`Advisors: Brian D. Adams, M.D. and Vijay K. Goel, Ph.D.
`Aging Studies Program
`
`0 Certificate in Aging Studies (July 2000)
`
`1992 ~ 1996
`
`Tulane University
`
`New Orleans, Louisiana
`
`College of Engineering
`
`0 B.S. in Biomedical Engineering
`0 Minor in Mechanical Engineering
`
`Experience
`
`July 201 1 — June 2012 Joint Replacement Surgeons of Indiana Research Foundation
`
`0 Development and validation of computational models of the hip and knee
`
`July 2004 — Present
`
`Rose—Hulman Institute of Technology Terre Haute, IN
`
`Associate Professor in Applied Biology & Biomedical Engineering (2010 - )
`
`Assistant Professor in Applied Biology & Biomedical Engineering (2004 - 10)
`
`0 Teaching Senior Design, Graphical Communications, Biomechanics,
`Orthopaedic Biomechanics, Bone Biomechanics; advising undergraduate
`students in Biomedical Engineering
`
`July 2000 — July 2004 Mercer University
`
`Macon, GA
`
`Assistant Professor in Biomedical Engineering
`
`0 Teaching Statics & Mechanics of Materials, Biomechanics (senior—level
`biomedical engineering course), Calculus I laboratory, Dynamics of
`Biological Fluids, Biomaterials, and Advanced Biomechanics
`
`Summer 2002 & 2003 Johnson Space Center
`
`Houston, TX
`
`Summer Faculty Fellow, Anthropometry & Biomechanics Facility
`
`0 Developed a three-dimensional kinematic model using data acquired
`from 3-D body surface scans to assess shoulder impingement during
`extravehicular activities.
`
`1996 — 2000
`
`Research Assistant
`
`University of Iowa
`
`Iowa City, Iowa
`
`0 Developed mathematical models, conducted cadaveric experiments,
`analyzed theoretical and experimental data, and assisted undergraduate
`students in design projects.
`
`Fall 1998, Spring 2000 University of Iowa
`
`Iowa City, Iowa
`
`Teaching Assistant
`
`LANCE 1010.10
`
`

`
`0 Conducted discussion sections for Mechanics of Deformable Bodies/
`
`Dynamics to assist students in working problems, formulated
`examinations/quizzes, and graded exams/quizzes.
`
`Publications
`
`Tokunaga S*, Rogge RD#, Small SR, Berend ME, Ritter MA. Metal Backing and
`
`Resection Depth as Factors in Tibial Loading Following TKA: A Finite Element Study.
`
`[l/I€dz'tzI/ E773/I76’€}‘1'I7\g Q1‘ P/.~2y.rzZ:\‘ (Submitted — Under Revision)
`
`Berend ME, Small SR, Howard L+, Rogge RD#. Buckley CA#, Ritter MA. High
`
`Initial Stability in Porous Titanium Acetabular Cups: A Biomechanical Study —]a2/r/1a/ zg/i
`A/‘2‘/J/sop/mg‘ (Submitted — Under Revision)
`
`Howe, S., Caves, K., Kleiner, C., Livesay, G., Norback, J .S., Rogge, R., Turner, C.,
`and T. Utschig. Nifty Ideas and Surprising Flops in Capstone Design Education.
`International Journal of Engineering Education 27(6): 1-12, 201 1.
`
`Small, S.R., Berend, M.E., Ritter, M.A., Buckley, C.A., and R.D. Rogge. Metal
`Backing Significantly Decreases Tibial Strains
`in Unicompartmental Knee
`Arthroplasty. Journal of Arthroplasty 26(5):777—82, 201 1.
`
`Livesay,G., Rogge, R., and KC Dee. Development of a Supplemental Evaluation for
`Engineering Design Courses. Advances in Engineering Education 2(l):1— 14, 2010.
`
`*Harrigan, K., *Logan, R., *S1uti, A., and R. Rogge. "Instrumented Sparring Vest to
`Aid in Martial Arts Scoring," Biomedical Sciences Instrumentation 42:21 1-16, 2006.
`”‘Student authors.
`
`Rogge, R. "Development of a Digital Human Model using Whole Body Scanning
`Technology," NASA Tech Briefs, 2008.
`
`Grosland, N.M., Rogge, R.D., and B.D. Adams. Influence of Articular Geometry on
`Prosthetic Wrist Stability. Clinical Orthopedics 421:134—42, 2004.
`
`Rogge, R.D., Adams, B.D., & V.K. Goel. An analysis of bone stresses and fixation
`stability using a finite element model of simulated distal radius fractures. J Hand
`Surgery 27A:86—92, 2002.
`
`Abst cts,
`ra
`Technical
`
`Papers’ 8‘
`Confemvoe
`Proceedings
`
`Rogge RD#, Tokunaga S*, Small SR, Berend ME, Ritter MA. The Influence of
`.
`.
`.
`.
`Bone Resection Depth on Tibial Loading. 2072 Or/bapaedz'r Rem:/1'/J Sorrel ’/177/71/:7/iMeeIz’/7kg
`
`Archer DB+, Kingman AL+, Hughes KR+, Small SR, Rogge RD#, Berend ME,
`Ritter MA. Biomechanical Assessment of Tibial Component Slope in
`Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty. 2011 Bz'o///erI'z'm/ E/zgz'/lee/7'/zg Somgy /i/Z/Zl/(I/.Ffl//
`I1/[eating
`
`Berend MB, Small SR, *Howard LA, Rogge RD, Buckley CA, Ritter MA. “High
`Initial Stability in Porous Titanium Acetabular Cup Designs: A Biomechanical
`Study”, Accepted for the 2010 Annual Biomedical Engineering Society Meeting.
`
`LANCE 1010.11
`
`

`
`*Tokunaga S, Small SR, Berend ME, Rogge RD, Ritter MA. “Factors Influencing
`Tibial Loading Following Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Finite Element Study”,
`Biomedical Engineering Society Meeting, Austin, Oct 2010.
`
`Small SR, Berend ME, Ritter MA, Buckley CA, and Rogge RD. Metal Backing
`Significantly Decreases Tibial Strains in Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty.
`American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons, Dallas, Oct 2009.
`
`"Development of an Evaluation Tool for
`Rogge, R., Livesay, G., and Dee, K.
`Assessing Student Practices, Independence, and Responsibility in Design Courses,"
`Proceedings of the 2009 Annual ASEE Conference. (Best Paper Award in the Design
`in Education Division)
`
`*Volitich M, *Younger SM, Small SR, Buckley CA, Rogge RD, and Berend ME.
`Strain in the Medial Tibia with Fixed All—Polyethylene Bearings in Unicompartmental
`Knee Arthroplasty. Poster Presentation to the Biomedical Engineering Annual Fall
`Meeting; Pittsburg, Oct 2009.
`
`*Volitich M, Small SR, Buckley CA, Rogge RD, Berend ME. Comparison of
`Photoelastic and Strain Gage Evaluation Techniques in an Orthopaedic Model. Poster
`Presentation to the Biomedical Engineering Society Annual Fall Meeting; Pittsburg,
`Oct 2009.
`
`"A Fall Simulator to Investigate the
`*Santoso, A., *Steward, A., and R. Rogge.
`Efficacy of Personal Protective Equipment," Proceedings of
`the 2009 Injury
`Biomechanics Symposium at Ohio State.
`
`*Baker, R., *Horton, K., *Varatharaj, A., *Wagner, Z. and R. Rogge. "Design and
`Construction of a Device to Investigate Head Trauma," Proceedings of the 2009
`ASEE IL/IN Conference. (*Student author, 1“ Place — Student Poster Competition)
`
`*Gregory, E., *Sheets, S., *Witten, B. and R. Rogge. “Comparison of Elbow Joint
`Angles for Male and Female Bat Swings,” Proceedings of the ASME 2008 Summer
`Bioengineering Conference (SBC2008)
`(*Student author,
`independent
`research
`project.)
`
`"‘Dick, S., *Maynard, S, and R. Rogge. “Repetitive Stress Injuries Research Device,”
`Proceedings of the 2008 ASEE IL/IN Section Conference (*Student author, 1“ Place -
`Student Poster Competition)
`
`*Sheridan, D., Rogge, R.D., and Livesay, G.A.: Testing of the impact characteristics
`of personal protective devices, Submitted for presentation at
`the ASME Summer
`Bioengineering Conference, Keystone, CO, June 20-24, 2007. (*Student author)
`
`J. Williams, A. Chidanandan, P. Coppinger, D. Fisher, M. Hirotani, R. Rogge, S.
`Sexton, M. Simoni, K. Sutterer, and D. Walter, “Measuring The Impact Of Tablet Pcs
`And Dyknow Vision Software On Students’ N ote—Taking Strategies: A Cross-
`Disciplinary Case Study,” in The Impact of Tablet PCs and Pen-based Technology on
`Education 2008, ed. J. Prey, R. Reed, and D. Berque, Purdue University Press, 2008.
`
`Dee, K.C., Livesay, G.A., and Rogge, R.D.: Development of a supplemental course
`
`LANCE 1010.12
`
`

`
`Boulder, CO, June 13-15, 2007. (*Won best paper honors)
`
`“A Practical Approach to ‘Closing the Loop’ in
`Livesay, G.A. and R.D. Rogge.
`Biomedical Engineering Design". Proceedings of the BMES 2006 Meeting.
`
`Rogge, R.D. and G.A. Livesay. “Design Bootcamp: Getting in Shape for a Capstone
`Experience,” Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference (2006).
`
`Livesay, G.A. & R.D. Rogge. “Vertical Mentoring: Closing the Loop in Design,”
`Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference (2006).
`
`Rogge, R., *Chappell, A., & S. Rajulu. “Development and Validation of a Digital
`Human Model for Space Hardware Design and Evaluation,” SAE Digital Human
`Modeling Conference: 2005, Iowa City, IA. (*Student co—author)
`
`Sumner, L.B. & R.D. Rogge. “Teaching with Technology: A Strategy for Pedagogy
`and Practicality using CAE Software,” ASEE Conference: 2005, Portland, OR.
`
`Rogge, R.D., Sumner, L.B., & J. Burtner. "Formative Assessment of a Computer-
`Aided Analysis Center: Plan Development and Preliminary Results," FIE: 2004,
`Savannah, GA.
`
`Rogge, R.D. "A Student—led Approach to Teaching Advanced Biomechanics,"
`Proceedings of the ASEE—Southeastern Section Meeting, April 2004.
`
`Grosland, N.M., Rogge, R.D., & B.D. Adams. "Influence of articular geometry on
`prosthetic wrist stability," in American Society of Biomechanics Conference
`Proceedings. ASB: 2003,Toledo, OH.
`
`Grosland, N.M., Rogge, R.D., Adams, B.D., & T.D. Brown. "Rotational dislocation
`resistance of a dual—curvature—radius total wrist implant," in Transactions of the
`Orthopaedic Research Society (Vol. 28). ORS: 2003, New Orleans, LA.
`
`Burtner, J.M. and R.D. Rogge. "Faculty advisors‘ management style and the
`development of students’ leadership capabilities," in the Annual ASEE National
`Conference Proceedings. ASEE—Nationa1: 2003, Nashville, TN.
`
`Rogge, R.D. and J.M. Burtner. "Case study in management style and leadership roles
`of faculty advisors to students organizations," in the Annual ASEE—Southeastern
`Conference Proceedings. ASEE—SE: 2003, Macon, GA.
`
`Rogge, R.D., Adams, B.D., Grosland, N.M., & V.K. Goel. "A finite element model
`to assess distal radius fracture stability," in the Annual International Conference of the
`IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Proceedings (Vol. 3). EMBS: 2002,
`Houston, TX.
`
`O'Brien, E.M. & R.D. Rogge. "LabView usage as part of the biomedical engineering
`senior design experience," in the Annual International Conference of the IEEE
`Engineering in Medicine and Biology Proceedings (Vol. 3). EMBS: 2002, Houston,
`TX.
`
`Rogge, R.D., Grosland, N.M., Goel, V.K. & B.D. Adams. "Influence of site and
`
`LANCE 1010.13
`
`

`
`severity of comminution on extra—articular distal radius fracture stability," in
`American Society of Biomechanics/World Congress of Biomechanics Joint Meeting
`Conference Proceedings. 2002, ASB: Calgary, Canada.
`
`Barnett, S.K. & R.D. Rogge. "Journal article critiques: a complement to upper—1eve1
`engineering courses," in the ASEE-Southeastern Section Conference Proceedings.
`2002, ASEE—SE: Gainesville, FL.
`
`R.D. Rogge. "Integrating finite element analysis into an undergraduate biomechanics
`course," in the ASEE—National Conference Proceedings. 2002, ASEE—Nati0nal:
`Montreal, Canada.
`
`Grosland, N .M., Rogge, R.D., Brown, T.D. and B.D. Adams. "Rotational dislocation
`propensity of an unconstrained total wrist implant," in the American Society of
`Biomechanics Proceedings. ASB: 2001, San Diego, CA.
`
`" Influence of articular geometry on
`Grosland, N.M., Rogge, R.D, & B.D. Adams.
`prosthetic wrist stability," in Transactions of the Orthopaedic Research Society (Vol.
`26). ORS: 2001, San Francisco, CA.
`
`Listed under Renee D. Heatlierlyi
`
`Heatherly, R.D., Grosland, N.M., Goel, V.K., & B.D. Adams. "A finite element
`
`analysis of distal radius fracture instability," in the Computational Methods in
`Orthopaedic Biomechanics Proceedings. Pre~ORS: 2000, Orlando, FL.
`
`Heatherly, R.D., Adams, B.D., & V.K. Goel. (June 1999) An evaluation of distal
`radius fracture pinning techniques using an experimentally validated FE model.
`ASME 1999 Summer Bioengineering Conference, Big Sky, MT.
`
`Heatherly, R.D., Adams, B.D., & V.K. Goel. (February 1999) Development and
`validation of a three—dimensional finite element model of the distal radius.
`
`Orthopaedic Research Society, Anaheim, CA.
`
`Heatherly, R.D., Adams, B.D., & V.K. Goel. (February 1998) Stress distribution in
`various pinning techniques usinga finite element model. American Academy of
`Orthopaedic Surgeons, New Orleans, LA.
`
`Adams, B.D., Heatherly, R.D., & V.K. Goel. (September 1998) Development and
`validation of a three—dimensional finite element of the distal radius. Third Triennial
`
`International Hand and Wrist Biomechanics Symposium, Minneapolis, MN.
`
`Contract or
`Grant Activities
`
`"MRI: Acquisition of a Biomechanics Biaxial Materials Testing and Measurement System”
`funded by the NSF. Co—PI: Dr. Christine Buckley. $335,309 (2010-2013)
`
`“Biomedical Engineering Senior Design Projects: Design & Implementation of
`Assistive Technology for People with Disabilities” funded by the NSF (Research to
`Aid Persons with Disabilities). Co-Pls: Dr. Glen Livesay & Dr. Fred Berry.
`$127,000 (2008-2013)
`
`Summer Faculty Development Grant ($5000) for "Development of an Upper
`
`LANCE 1010.14
`
`

`
`Extremity Model for Investigating Fall and Fracture Mechanics"
`
`Weaver Research Award ($2500) for Michael Volitich ("Comparison of Photoelastic
`and Strain Gage Measurement Techniques in a Total Joint Replacement
`Biomechanics Model")
`
`— Award to develop classroom teaching
`HP Tablet PC/DyKnow Project Proposal
`techniques in Biomechanics using the Tablet PC and DyKnow.
`
`W.M. Keck Foundation ($340,000) — Award to develop computational engineering
`analysis facility at Mercer University School of Engineering (2002-2005). (Co—PI:
`Loren Sumner)
`
`NASA—Johnson Space Center ($16,993) — Award to develop a 3-D representation of
`suited and unsuited astronauts for use in design and development of space hardware
`(2003-2004).
`
`Ford Motor Company & Society of Women Engineers ($3400) —— Award to conduct
`three workshops illustrating the various applications of engineering to high school
`girls (2001-2002). (Co—PI: Joan Burtner)
`
`Awards
`
`$335,309 grant from the National Science Foundation to expand biomechanical
`instrumentation for undergraduate research projects in orthopedics that could lead to
`the development of improved, cost effective design alternatives for knee and hip
`implants.
`
`ASEE Design in Engineering Education Division Best Paper Award, 2009 Meeting
`
`2009 NASA Tech Brief Award for publication on Digital Human Modeling
`
`Recipient of the Edward T. Edwards Award from the Knox County ARC. This
`award is presented to an individual or organization which has made a contribution
`that resulted in improved opportunities for people with disabilities. Awarded 5 times
`in the last 27 years.
`
`2006 National Scholar Award for Workplace Innovation and Design —~ worked with
`students in senior design who won a $10,000 award for their individual efforts.
`Rose—Hu1man was awarded a $10,000 matching award to be used in BE senior design
`projects.
`
`Organizational
`1nV°|V9m9m
`
`I was
`I am an active member of the American Society for Engineering Education.
`the 2010 Program Chair for the Design in Engineering Education Division (DEED).
`I am serving as the Treasurer/Secretary for the 2010-201 1 year. As an active
`participant in this division, I played an integral role in the development of a
`“Financial Assistance Program” that provides seed money for student design teams
`that are developing innovation solutions to assistive technology challenges. This
`program is supported by DEED and NISH, an organization that works to employ
`
`LANCE 1010.15
`
`

`
`Research
`Interests
`
`Teaching
`Expefience
`
`years and have awarded seed grants totaling over $20,000 to ~ 45 teams.
`
`.
`I am actively involved in the Orthopaedic Biomechamcs Laboratory (OBL) at Rose-
`Hulman. The OBL is a collaboration between the Joint Replacement Surgeons of
`Indiana (JRSI) Research Foundation, based at the Center for Hip & Knee Surgery in
`Mooresville, IN and Rose—Hulman Institute of Technology. The program was
`established to provide undergraduate and graduate engineering students at Rose-
`Hulman with valuable research opportunities in the field of orthopaedics.
`
`I have been a professional educator for 10 years and thoroughly enjoy the experience.
`As a faculty member at an undergraduate—focused institution, I typically teach three
`courses each quarter.
`I have developed and taught courses in biomechanics, bone
`biomechanics, orthopaedic biomechanics, biomedical engineering laboratory, and
`research methods in biomechanics. Most of my classes include a laboratory
`component because I firmly believe that students need as much hands—on experience
`as possible.
`
`LANCE 1010.16