`
`IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`
`COALITION FOR AFFORDABLE DRUGS II LLC,
`
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`NPS PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
`
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`
`Cases IPR2015-00990 and IPR2015-01093
`(Patent 7,056,886 B2)1
`
`
`PATENT OWNER’S REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1 Pursuant to the Board’s Scheduling Order in these IPRs, “the word-for-word
`identical paper is filed in each proceeding identified in the heading.” See, e.g.,
`IPR2015-00990, Paper 29, footnote 1.
`
`28520775v1
`
`
`
`IPR2015-00990; -01093
`Patent Owner’s Request for Oral Argument
`
`Pursuant to the Board’s October 23, 2015 Scheduling Order (IPR2015-
`
`00990, Paper 29; IPR2015-01093, Paper 27) and the Notices of Stipulation
`
`Regarding Scheduling Order (IPR2015-00990, Papers 31 and 39; IPR2015-01093,
`
`Papers 29 and 37), Patent Owner respectfully requests oral argument, scheduled for
`
`June 23, 2016. Patent Owner requests 90 minutes to present its arguments. Under
`
`37 C.F.R. § 42.70, and without intending to waive any issue not specifically
`
`identified, Patent Owner specifies the following issues to be argued:
`
`1. Whether Petitioner has met its burden of proving claims 46-50, 52,
`
`and 69-75 are unpatentable as obvious over the combination of Drucker ’379,
`
`Kornfelt, and Osterberg, in IPR2015-00990.
`
`2. Whether Petitioner has met its burden of proving claims 51 and 75 are
`
`unpatentable as obvious over the combination of Drucker ’379, Kornfelt,
`
`Osterberg, and Munroe, in IPR2015-00990.
`
`3. Whether Petitioner has met its burden of proving claims 61-67 are
`
`unpatentable as obvious over the combination of Drucker ’600, Kornfelt,
`
`Osterberg, and Holthuis in IPR2015-00990.
`
`4. Whether Petitioner has met its burden of proving claim 68 is
`
`unpatentable as obvious over the combination of Drucker ’600, Kornfelt,
`
`Osterberg, Holthuis, and Munroe, in IPR2015-00990.
`
`28520775v1
`
`1
`
`
`
`IPR2015-00990; -01093
`Patent Owner’s Request for Oral Argument
`
`5. Whether Petitioner has met its burden of proving claims 1-27, 33-35,
`
`38, and 45 are unpatentable as obvious over the combination of Drucker ’379,
`
`Kornfelt, and Osterberg, in IPR2015-01093.
`
`6. Whether Petitioner has met its burden of proving claims 31, 32, and
`
`44 are unpatentable as obvious over the combination of Drucker ’379, Kornfelt,
`
`Osterberg, and Munroe, in IPR2015-01093.
`
`7. Whether Petitioner has met its burden of proving claims 39 and 40 are
`
`unpatentable as obvious over the combination of Drucker ’379, Kornfelt,
`
`Osterberg, and Holthuis, in IPR2015-01093.
`
`8. Whether Petitioner has met its burden of proving claim 36 and 37 are
`
`unpatentable as obvious over the combination of Drucker ’379, Kornfelt,
`
`Osterberg, and Drucker ’574, in IPR2015-02093.
`
`9. Any issues specified by Petitioner in its Request for Oral Argument.
`
`10. Rebuttal to Petitioner’s presentation on all matters; and
`
`11. Any other issues that the Board deems necessary for issuing a final
`
`written decision.
`
`Patent Owner requests the ability to use a digital projector and screen for use
`
`with a laptop computer to display demonstrative exhibits, but will direct that
`
`request to trials@uspto.gov not less than five days before the hearing, unless the
`
`Board instructs otherwise.
`
`28520775v1
`
`2
`
`
`
`IPR2015-00990; -01093
`Patent Owner’s Request for Oral Argument
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Dated: May 18, 2016
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` Respectfully submitted,
`
`/Joseph R. Robinson/
`
`Joseph R. Robinson, PTO Reg. No. 33,448
`
` Heather M. Ettinger, PTO Reg. No. 51,658
` Dustin B. Weeks, PTO Reg. No. 67,466
` Attorneys for Patent Owner
`
`28520775v1
`
`3
`
`
`
`IPR2015-00990; -01093
`Patent Owner’s Request for Oral Argument
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`The undersigned hereby certifies that a copy of the foregoing PATENT
`
`OWNER’S REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT has been on attorney for
`
`Petitioner, served via electronic mail on May 18, 2016, to the following addresses
`
`provided by Petitioner:
`
`Jeffrey D. Blake, Esq.
`jblake@merchantgould.com
`
`
`
`28520775v1
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` Respectfully submitted,
`
`/Dustin B. Weeks/
`
` Dustin B. Weeks, PTO Reg. No. 67,466
`
`
`Dated: May 18, 2016
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
