throbber
Human [Gly2]GLP-2 reduces the severity of colonic
`injury in a murine model of experimental colitis
`
`DANIEL J. DRUCKER,1 BERNARDO YUSTA,1 ROBIN P. BOUSHEY,1
`LORRAINE DEFOREST,1 AND PATRICIA L. BRUBAKER1,2
`Department of 1Medicine, Banting and Best Diabetes Centre,
`The Toronto Hospital, and 2Department of Physiology, University of Toronto,
`Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5G 2C4
`
`Drucker, Daniel J., Bernardo Yusta, Robin P. Boushey,
`Lorraine DeForest and Patricia L. Brubaker. Human
`[Gly2]GLP-2 reduces the severity of colonic injury in a murine
`model of experimental colitis. Am. J. Physiol. 276 (Gastro-
`intest. Liver Physiol. 39): G79–G91, 1999.—The pathology of
`Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis is characterized by
`chronic inflammation and destruction of the gastrointestinal
`epithelium. Although suppression of inflammatory mediators
`remains the principle component of current disease therapeu-
`tics, strategies for enhancing repair and regeneration of the
`compromised intestinal epithelium have not been widely
`explored. The demonstration that a peptide hormone secreted
`by the intestinal epithelium, glucagon-like peptide-2 (GLP-2),
`is a potent endogenous stimulator of intestinal epithelial
`proliferation in the small bowel prompted studies of the
`therapeutic efficacy of GLP-2 in CD1 and BALB/c mice with
`dextran sulfate (DS)-induced colitis. We report here that a
`human GLP-2 analog (h[Gly2]GLP-2) significantly reverses
`weight loss, reduces interleukin-1 expression, and increases
`colon length, crypt depth, and both mucosal area and integ-
`rity in the colon of mice with acute DS colitis. The effects of
`h[Gly2]GLP-2 in the colon are mediated in part via enhanced
`stimulation of mucosal epithelial cell proliferation. These
`observations suggest that exploitation of the normal mecha-
`nisms used to regulate intestinal proliferation may be a
`useful adjunct for healing mucosal epithelium in the presence
`of active intestinal inflammation.
`intestine; inflammatory bowel disease; epithelium; growth
`factor; inflammation
`
`INFLAMMATION OF THE intestinal epithelium, as exempli-
`fied by Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis, results in
`considerable morbidity, and current therapeutic strate-
`gies, generally directed at suppressing components of
`the inflammatory response, remain suboptimal (27).
`The identification of molecules important for maintain-
`ing the growth and integrity of the mucosal epithelium
`has stimulated the development of novel approaches
`toward enhancement of mucosal protection in the gut.
`For example, the observation that trefoil peptides are
`abundantly expressed in the epithelium after intestinal
`injury was followed by studies demonstrating that mice
`deficient in intestinal trefoil factor are more susceptible
`to mucosal injury and recombinant intestinal trefoil
`factor enhances epithelial healing of the murine colon
`in vivo (35). Similarly, the demonstration that the
`
`The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the
`payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby
`marked ‘‘advertisement’’ in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734
`solely to indicate this fact.
`
`keratinocyte growth factor (KGF) stimulates epithelial
`cell proliferation in the gastrointestinal tract (30),
`taken together with increased KGF expression in in-
`flammatory bowel disease (IBD) (51), suggests a pos-
`sible link between KGF and intestinal epithelial func-
`tion in vivo. We have now examined the therapeutic
`potential of a recently described intestinal growth
`factor, glucagon-like peptide-2 (GLP-2), in mice with
`dextran sulfate (DS)-induced colitis.
`Despite ongoing advances in our understanding of
`the cell biology of the gastrointestinal epithelium,
`principal strategies for treatment of IBD remain fo-
`cused on suppression of the cellular and humoral
`inflammatory response. These approaches involve local
`or systemic administration of corticosteroids, aminosa-
`licylates, or immunomodulatory agents such as azathio-
`prine, mercaptopurine, cyclosporin, and methotrexate
`(27). Although these latter agents are generally effec-
`tive they do not specifically target the intestine and
`their side effects may be considerable, precluding long-
`term use in patients with chronic IBD. Newer targeted
`approaches to immunosuppressive and anti-inflamma-
`tory therapy, including use of monoclonal antibodies
`against lymphocyte antigens (24, 48) or tumor necrosis
`factor (TNF) (46, 50), interleukin-4 (IL-4) delivery via
`adenoviral gene transfer (29), and antisense oligonucleo-
`tides for suppression of intercellular adhesion molecule
`activity (ICAM), are currently under evaluation.
`The rapid turnover and renewal of differentiated cell
`types that constitute the mucosal epithelium of the
`small and large bowel raise the possibility that stimula-
`tion of epithelial proliferation may be useful for enhanc-
`ing repair of epithelial damage in vivo. Identification of
`growth factors produced locally in the bowel that
`regulate crypt cell proliferation, such as epidermal
`growth factor, transforming growth factor-␣ (TGF-␣),
`and insulin-like growth factor I (18), provides an oppor-
`tunity to manipulate mucosal epithelial regeneration
`in experimental models of intestinal damage or resec-
`tion. The gastrointestinal tract also secretes regulatory
`peptides such as gastrin and gastrin-releasing peptide,
`with intestinal growth-promoting activity (28, 31, 56).
`The observation that injury of the intestinal mucosa is
`frequently associated with increased secretion of the
`proglucagon-derived peptides (PGDPs) (4), taken to-
`gether with increased intestinal growth in patients and
`rodents with glucagon-producing tumors (20, 26, 47),
`resulted in the identification of GLP-2 as the PGDP
`with intestinal growth factor-like activity (20).
`GLP-2 administered to normal mice and rats in-
`creases growth of the mucosal epithelium in small and
`
`0193-1857/99 $5.00 Copyright r 1999 the American Physiological Society
`
`G79
`
`CFAD Exhibit 1023
`
`1
`
`

`

`G80
`
`H[GLY2]GLP-2 IN A MURINE MODEL OF COLITIS
`
`large intestine (21, 53). The increase in small bowel
`mass is attributable in part to activation of crypt cell
`proliferation and inhibition of enterocyte apoptosis
`(53). GLP-2 also promotes intestinal hexose transport
`via upregulation of sodium-dependent glucose trans-
`porter 1 (SGLT-1) activity (11, 12). The importance of
`GLP-2 as a trophic factor for intestinal epithelium is
`illustrated by studies demonstrating that GLP-2 infu-
`sion prevents parenteral nutrition-associated mucosal
`hypoplasia in rats (10). To address the possibility that
`GLP-2 may be therapeutically useful for enhancing the
`endogenous reparative response to mucosal epithelial
`damage, we administered a degradation-resistant hu-
`man GLP-2 analog, h[Gly2]GLP-2 (6, 21), to mice with
`experimental DS-induced colitis.
`
`METHODS
`
`Animals and experimental protocol. Groups of 6- to 8-wk-
`old female CD1 mice, 22–24 g or 8- to 9-wk-old female BALB/c
`mice, 18–21 g (Charles River), were housed in plastic bottom,
`wire-lid cages, maintained on a 12:12-h light-dark cycle, and
`allowed chow and water containing 0 or 5.0% DS ad libitum
`throughout the study. The experiments carried out with CD1
`mice, designated experiments A and B, were carried out with
`treatment groups containing four to five mice housed to-
`gether. The experiments with BALB/c mice were carried out
`with five mice per control group for saline- and h[Gly2]GLP-2-
`treated mice (not receiving DS) and 10 mice per treatment
`group for the DS arm of the study, each BALB/c mouse being
`housed in a separate cage. CD1 mice were injected with either
`0.5 ml saline or 750 ng h[Gly2]GLP-2 in 0.5 ml saline twice
`daily. BALB/c mice were injected with either 0.5 ml saline or
`350 ng h[Gly2]GLP-2 in 0.5 ml saline twice daily.
`For the experiments with BALB/c mice individual water
`intake was recorded every 2 days. DS (mol wt 40,000–50,000;
`United States Biochemicals, Cleveland, Ohio, lot 103811) was
`freshly dissolved in drinking water throughout the study for
`both CD1 and BALB/c mice. Four days before the start of the
`study, mice were weighed using a Mettler PJ300 scale and
`randomly allocated to treatment groups. Subcutaneous injec-
`tions of PBS or h[Gly2]GLP-2 were administered twice daily,
`at 8 AM and 6 PM. Groups of mice received either regular
`autoclaved drinking water or water supplemented with 5.0%
`DS. CD1 mice were killed on the morning of day 11 after
`receiving 10 full days of water alone or water with DS and the
`final timed injection of saline or h[Gly2]GLP-2 was adminis-
`tered 2 h before mice were killed. BALB/c mice receiving DS
`appeared sicker than CD1 mice; after 9 days of DS treatment
`two deaths occurred in the saline-treated group and one
`death in the h[Gly2]GLP-2-treated group before day 10. After
`consultation with veterinary staff, the remaining groups of
`BALB/c mice were killed on day 10, after receiving ⬃91⁄3 days
`of oral DS. Two additional deaths in the BALB/c group (1 in
`saline-treated DS group, 1 in h[Gly2]GLP-2-treated DS group)
`occurred on day 10 on the morning when the mice were killed.
`Synthetic h[Gly2]GLP-2 was obtained from Allelix Biophar-
`maceuticals (Mississauga, Ontario, Canada). The exact pep-
`tide concentrations of different lots of h[Gly2]GLP-2 used in
`experiments A–C were determined using a combination of
`amino acid sequencing and HPLC. All animal experiments
`were carried out following experimental guidelines approved
`by the Animal Care Committee of the Toronto Hospital. The
`DS colitis experiments were carried out on several occasions,
`with similar results, and the data shown here are from three
`representative experiments designated A–C.
`
`Experimental analyses. Intestinal weights, morphology,
`enzymatic activity, and GLP-2 content were assessed as
`described previously (6, 7, 20, 53). For analysis of tissue
`PGDP content 2 cm of distal ileum (2 cm from cecum) and
`distal colon (2 cm from the anus) were homogenized on ice in 5
`ml of extraction buffer (1 N HCl, 5% HCOOH, 1% trifluoroace-
`tic acid, 1% NaCl) and extracted as described previously (13).
`RNA was prepared from homogenates of distal jejunum,
`ileum, and colon (13) and analyzed as previously described
`(7). Blood for GLP-2 RIA was collected in a final volume of
`10% Trasylol, EDTA, Diprotin A (5,000 KIU/ml:32 mM:0.1
`nM), and plasma was stored at ⫺80°C before analysis by RIA
`(6). Semiquantitative RT-PCR was carried out with aliquots
`analyzed from a range (20–30) of cycle numbers to ensure
`linearity for mouse TGF-␣ mRNA as previously described (8,
`9, 34). The PCR conditions were 94°C for 1 min and 68°C for 2
`min for 30 cycles. Primers for TGF-␣ were 58-TGCAGCACCCT-
`GCGCTCGGAAGAT-38 and 58-CCACCTGGCCAAATTCC-
`TCCTCTG-38. Occult blood testing was carried out using
`Hematest reagent tablets (Bayer, Etobicoke, Canada), as per
`the manufacturers’ instructions. Myeloperoxidase (MPO) ac-
`tivity was assayed spectrophotometrically as previously de-
`scribed (5). Statistical differences between treatment groups
`were determined by ANOVA using Tukey’s studentized range
`test for multiple comparisons at P ⫽ 0.05.
`Histological analysis. Intestinal segments for histology
`were taken from proximal
`jejunum (8 cm distal to the
`pylorus), distal jejunum (18 cm distal to the pylorus), proxi-
`mal ileum (10 cm before the cecum), and distal ileum (just
`proximal to cecum) and from the colon (1–3, 3–5, 5–7, and
`7–9 cm distal to the cecum). Tissues were fixed in 10%
`buffered Formalin for 48 h and embedded in paraffin using
`standard techniques. Four- to six-micrometer cross sections
`were cut and stained with hematoxylin and eosin. Intestinal
`micrometry was performed using a Leica Q500MC image
`analysis system. Ten well-oriented villi and 25 well-oriented
`crypts from each small intestinal section were used to deter-
`mine villus height and crypt depth. Disease severity was
`graded on a scale from 0–3 according to a standard scoring
`system (42): 0, normal bowel; 1, focal inflammatory cell
`infiltrate; 2, inflammatory cell infiltrate, gland drop out and
`crypt abscess; and 3, mucosal ulceration. Crypt cell prolifera-
`tion index as assessed by proliferating cell nuclear antigen
`(PCNA) staining and colonic epithelial apoptosis index as
`assessed by percent TUNEL-positive cells was carried out as
`previously described (20, 53).
`
`RESULTS
`
`Control mice not exposed to DS treated with either
`saline or h[Gly2]GLP-2 gained weight over the 9- to
`10-day experimental period (Fig. 1). The slightly in-
`creased body weight gain in the CD1 h[Gly2]GLP-2-
`treated control mice is largely attributable to the
`relatively greater increase in small bowel mass follow-
`ing treatment with the larger dose (750 ng twice daily)
`of h[Gly2]GLP-2 (Figs. 1 and 2).
`Mice receiving 5% DS in the drinking water devel-
`oped loose blood-streaked stools after 4–5 days, became
`progressively more lethargic, and lost ⬃20–25% of
`their body weight at the end of the 9- to 10-day
`experiment (Fig. 1). In contrast, h[Gly2]GLP-2-treated
`mice receiving 5% DS appeared much healthier and
`lost significantly less weight over the 9- to 10-day
`experimental period (P ⬍ 0.05 for both CD1 and
`BALB/c experiments, DS-h[Gly2]GLP-2- vs. DS-saline-
`treated groups, Fig. 1).
`
`2
`
`

`

`H[GLY2]GLP-2 IN A MURINE MODEL OF COLITIS
`
`G81
`
`exposed to DS but treated with h[Gly2]GLP-2, 750 ng
`twice daily for 10 days, had a significant increase in
`small bowel mass (Fig. 2B, 2.2 ⫾ 0.04 vs. 1.3 ⫾ 0.01 g
`h[Gly2]GLP-2 vs. control for experiment A, P ⬍ 0.05).
`CD1 mice with DS colitis treated with saline alone had
`a significant reduction in the mass of the small bowel
`(P ⬍ 0.05 for experiments A and B, Fig. 2B). In contrast,
`DS-h[Gly2]GLP-2-treated CD1 mice with colitis (experi-
`ments A and B) exhibited a significant increase in small
`bowel mass (Fig. 2B, 1.85 ⫾ 0.2 vs. 0.86 ⫾ 0.1 g,
`DS-h[Gly2]GLP-2- vs. DS-saline-treated mice for experi-
`ment A, P ⬍ 0.05) and a small but significant increase
`in small bowel length in experiment B (Fig. 2B, P ⬍
`0.05).
`Treatment of healthy control CD1 mice with
`h[Gly2]GLP-2 produced a significant increase in large
`bowel weight (Fig. 2B, 0.27 ⫾ 0.01 vs. 0.35 ⫾ 0.01, P ⬍
`0.05 saline- vs. h[Gly2]GLP-2-treated animals), consis-
`tent with the results of previous studies (19). Similarly,
`mice with DS colitis (experiments A and B) treated with
`h[Gly2]GLP-2 had a significant increment in large
`bowel weight (0.24 ⫾ 0.04 vs. 0.32 ⫾ 0.02 g, DS-saline-
`vs. DS-h[Gly2]GLP-2-treated mice, P ⬍ 0.05, Fig. 2B,
`experiment A). Treatment of normal CD1 mice with
`h[Gly2]GLP-2, 750 ng twice daily, produced a small but
`significant increment in large bowel length (Fig. 2B, b
`and f). Mice with DS colitis also exhibited a significant
`decrease in large bowel length (P ⬍ 0.05, saline-treated
`controls vs. mice with DS colitis, Fig. 2B). Although
`length was greater in h[Gly2]GLP-2-
`large bowel
`treated mice with colitis (Fig. 2B) this difference was
`statistically significant for mice in experiment B (DS-
`saline- vs. DS-h[Gly2]GLP-2-treated mice, P ⬍ 0.05)
`but not in experiment A (Fig. 2B).
`Similar results were observed for BALB/c mice with
`DS colitis treated with a lower dose of h[Gly2]GLP-2
`(350 ng twice daily). The relative magnitude of increase
`in small bowel weight in wild-type BALB/c mice treated
`with 350 ng h[Gly2]GLP-2 was smaller than in CD1
`mice but still significant (P ⬍ 0.05, saline- vs.
`h[Gly2]GLP-2-treated mice, Fig. 2B). The BALB/c mice
`receiving 5% DS appeared more ill than the CD1 mice,
`and a total of five BALB/c DS mice died during this
`experiment (3 in the saline-treated and 2 in the
`h[Gly2]GLP-2-treated group). The small bowel weight
`was significantly reduced in BALB/c DS-saline mice
`and increased significantly in mice treated with
`h[Gly2]GLP-2 (P ⬍ 0.05, saline- vs. h[Gly2]GLP-2-
`treated BALB/c mice, Fig. 2B). The large bowel weights
`of saline-treated BALB/c mice with DS colitis were
`significantly reduced compared with h[Gly2]GLP-2-
`treated mice with colitis, P ⬍ 0.05. Furthermore, the
`large bowel lengths were markedly reduced in both
`saline- and h[Gly2]GLP-2-treated BALB/c mice with
`colitis, but large bowel length was significantly greater
`in the h[Gly2]GLP-2-treated mice (P ⬍ 0.05, h[Gly2]GLP-
`2-treated vs. saline-treated BALB/c mice with DS coli-
`tis, Fig. 2B).
`As small and large bowel wet weights in mice with
`intestinal inflammation potentially reflect cellular infil-
`tration, hyperplasia, increased protein synthesis, and/or
`edema, we compared wet and dry small and large bowel
`
`Fig. 1. Change in body weight in groups of CD1 mice (experiments A
`and B, n ⫽ 5 mice for each treatment group) or BALB/c mice
`[experiment C, n ⫽ 5 mice for each control group and 10 mice for each
`treatment group receiving dextran sulfate (DS) in water] receiving
`either drinking water alone or 5% DS and saline vs. human glucagon-
`like peptide-2 analog (h[Gly2]GLP-2; 750 or 350 ng twice daily for
`CD1 vs. BALB/c mice, respectively) subcutaneous injections for 9–10
`days. *P ⬍ 0.05 for saline-treated control vs. 5% DS-saline groups.
`⫹P ⬍ 0.05 for 5% DS-saline vs. 5% DS-h[Gly2]GLP-2. Statistical
`differences between treatment groups were determined by ANOVA
`using Tukey’s studentized range test for multiple comparisons.
`
`GLP-1 has recently been shown to inhibit food and
`water intake (49, 55), whereas GLP-2 had no effect on
`food intake in mice over a 10-day experimental period
`(53). Nevertheless, one potential explanation for the
`different degree of illness and weight loss in our
`experiments might be due to theoretical effects of
`h[Gly2]GLP-2 on reduction of water intake and subse-
`quent cumulative intestinal exposure to DS. Saline-
`injected control BALB/c mice not receiving 5% DS had a
`mean daily water intake of 6.5 ⫾ 0.3 vs. 6.7 ⫾ 0.4 ml for
`h[Gly2]GLP-2-treated control mice (P not significant).
`Furthermore, the cumulative intake of 5% DS water
`over the entire 9-day experiment, as well as the 5% DS
`water intake from experimental days 7–9, was signifi-
`cantly greater for h[Gly2]GLP-2-treated compared with
`saline-treated BALB/c mice receiving 5% DS (4.96 ⫾
`0.5 vs. 5.9 ⫾ 0.6 ml/day for saline- vs. h[Gly2]GLP-2-
`treated mice with DS colitis on days 7–9, P ⬍ 0.05).
`These observations demonstrate that the difference in
`disease severity between groups cannot be explained on
`the basis of any putative effects of GLP-2 on water
`intake and hence intestinal exposure to DS.
`To determine the consequences of h[Gly2]GLP-2 ad-
`ministration in mice with DS-induced colitis, we exam-
`ined the gastrointestinal tract from the stomach to the
`colon in control and DS colitis treatment groups. Al-
`though no visible or microscopic pathology was de-
`tected in the stomach of DS-treated CD1 mice, stomach
`weight was reduced in the DS-saline-treated group and
`was restored toward normal in the DS-h[Gly2]GLP-2-
`treated mice (Fig. 2A, P ⬍ 0.05). Control CD1 mice not
`
`3
`
`

`

`G82
`
`H[GLY2]GLP-2 IN A MURINE MODEL OF COLITIS
`
`Fig. 2. A: stomach weight in groups of CD1 mice
`(experiment A) receiving either drinking water
`alone or 5% DS and saline vs. h[Gly2]GLP-2
`subcutaneous injections for 10 days. *P ⬍ 0.05
`for DS-saline-treated vs. either saline-treated
`alone or h[Gly2]GLP-2-treated mice. ⫹P ⬍ 0.05
`for 5% DS-saline vs. 5% DS-h[Gly2]GLP-2. C: wet
`and dry weights in 1-cm segments from jejunum,
`ileum, and colon of control and DS CD1 mice from
`experiment A. *P⬍0.05 for saline-treated nor-
`mal controls vs. all other groups. XP ⬍ 0.05 for
`h[Gly2]GLP-2-treated control vs. h[Gly2]GLP-2-
`treated DS. ⵩P ⬍ 0.05 for h[Gly2]GLP-2-treated
`DS vs. saline-treated DS mice.
`
`weights in CD1 mice with and without colitis (Fig. 2C).
`The increase in small bowel wet and dry weights in
`control mice treated with h[Gly2]GLP-2 was most evi-
`dent in the jejunum (P ⬍ 0.05, saline- vs. h[Gly2]GLP-2-
`treated control mice, Fig. 2C). Both saline- and
`h[Gly2]GLP-2-treated mice with DS colitis had in-
`creased wet colon weights (P ⬍ 0.05, control vs. DS
`colitis groups). In contrast, only the h[Gly2]GLP-2-
`treated mice with DS colitis had significantly increased
`dry colon weights (P ⬍ 0.05, saline- vs. h[Gly2]GLP-2-
`treated mice with DS colitis, Fig. 2C).
`
`Control CD1 mice treated with h[Gly2]GLP-2 exhib-
`ited a significant increase in jejunal crypt and villus
`height that was most prominent in the proximal jeju-
`num (P ⬍ 0.05, saline- vs. h[Gly2]GLP-2-treated mice,
`Fig. 3), consistent with previous experiments (19, 54).
`Histological analysis of the intestine from DS mice
`treated with saline injections demonstrated a reduction
`in small bowel villus and crypt height that was most
`marked in the jejunum (Fig. 3A). In contrast, mice with
`DS colitis treated with h[Gly2]GLP-2 exhibited a signifi-
`cant increase in small bowel villus height and crypt
`
`4
`
`

`

`H[GLY2]GLP-2 IN A MURINE MODEL OF COLITIS
`
`G83
`
`Fig. 2. B: intestinal weight and length in mice receiv-
`ing water alone or 5% DS. Small (a and e) and large (b
`and f) bowel weights and lengths (c and g and d and h
`for small and large bowel, respectively); means ⫾ SE
`for CD1 mice in experiments A and B and for BALB/c
`mice in experiment C. *P⬍0.05 for saline-treated vs.
`either h[Gly2]GLP-2-treated, DS-saline-treated, or DS-
`h[Gly2]GLP-2-treated mice. #P ⬍ 0.05 for h[Gly2]GLP-
`2- vs. 5% DS-saline-treated mice. ⫹P ⬍ 0.05 for 5%
`DS-saline- vs. 5% DS-h[Gly2]GLP-2-treated groups.
`
`5
`
`

`

`G84
`
`H[GLY2]GLP-2 IN A MURINE MODEL OF COLITIS
`
`Fig. 3. A: villus height and crypt depth
`from CD1 mouse small intestine, experi-
`ment A. PJ and DJ, proximal and distal
`jejunum; DI, distal ileum. *P ⬍ 0.05 for
`saline-treated vs. either h[Gly2]GLP-2-
`treated, 5% DS-saline-treated, or 5% DS-
`h[Gly2]GLP-2-treated mice. #P ⬍ 0.05 for
`h[Gly2]GLP-2-treated vs. 5% DS-saline-
`treated or 5% DS-h[Gly2]GLP-2-treated
`mice. ⫹P ⬍ 0.05 for 5% DS-saline- vs. 5%
`DS-h[Gly2]GLP-2-treated mice. B: crypt
`depth in colon of CD1 mice, experiment A.
`*P ⬍ 0.05 for saline- vs. h[Gly2]GLP-2-
`treated mice. #P ⬍ 0.05 for h[Gly2]GLP-2-
`vs. 5% DS-saline-treated mice. ⫹P ⬍ 0.05
`for 5% DS-saline- vs. 5% DS-h[Gly2]GLP-2-
`treated mice. C: crypt cell proliferation
`rate in colon as assessed by percentage
`of proliferating cell nuclear antigen
`(PCNA)-positive labeled cells (n ⫽ 15–25
`histological sections for CD1 mice in each
`arm of experiment A). ⫹P ⬍ 0.001 for 5%
`DS-saline- vs. 5% DS-h[Gly2]GLP-2-treated
`mice. # P ⬍ 0.01 for h[Gly2]GLP-2-
`treated control vs. 5% DS-h[Gly2]GLP-2-
`treated mice. D: apoptosis in mucosal epi-
`thelium of CD1 mice from group A as
`assessed by TUNEL immunopositivity
`(n ⫽ 20–25 histological sections from each
`experimental group). *P ⬍ 0.05 for saline-
`treated vs. h[Gly2]GLP-2-treated control
`mice.
`
`depth in both proximal and distal jejunum and ileum
`(Fig. 3A, P ⬍ 0.05 for DS-h[Gly2]GLP-2- vs. DS-saline-
`treated mice). In the colon, crypt depth was reduced in
`DS colitis mice treated with saline alone; however,
`crypt depth was significantly increased in mice with
`colitis treated with h[Gly2]GLP-2 (P ⬍ 0.05, DS-
`h[Gly2]GLP-2- vs. DS-saline-treated mice, Fig. 3B).
`Histological analysis of murine small bowel demon-
`strated an increase in both crypt cell proliferation and a
`decrease in epithelial cell apoptosis following treat-
`ment with GLP-2 (20, 53). Although increased numbers
`of PCNA-positive cells were observed in the colon of
`control CD1 mice treated with h[Gly2]GLP-2, the in-
`crease was not statistically significant (P ⫽ 0.1, Fig.
`3C). In contrast, a highly significant increase in the
`number of PCNA-positive cells was detected in histologi-
`cal sections from h[Gly2]GLP-2-treated mice with DS
`colitis (Fig. 3C, DS-h[Gly2]GLP-2- vs. DS-saline-
`treated mice, P ⬍ 0.001). Although h[Gly2]GLP-2-
`treated control mice exhibited a significant decrease in
`apoptotic cells in the colon (P ⬍ 0.05), no significant
`change in the percentage of apoptotic cells was ob-
`
`served in DS-h[Gly2]GLP-2- vs. DS-saline-treated mice
`(Fig. 3D).
`The colons from both CD1 and BALB/c mice with DS
`colitis contained blood and exhibited varying degrees of
`mucosal infiltration with leukocytes, loss of normal
`glandular architecture, and areas of both crypt erosion
`and destruction. All BALB/c mice receiving DS were
`occult blood positive when they were killed. Gross blood
`in the colon was visible at necropsy in four saline-
`treated and two h[Gly2]GLP-2-treated BALB/c mice
`with colitis. The damage to the epithelial mucosa was
`quantified by assessment of the total mucosal area in
`multiple histological segments from proximal, middle,
`and distal colon from CD1 mice. An increase in mucosal
`surface area in all three regions of the colon was
`observed in healthy control mice treated with
`h[Gly2]GLP-2 (Fig. 4A, P ⬍ 0.05 for h[Gly2]GLP-2- vs.
`saline-treated control mice). Mice treated with DS and
`saline injections exhibited a significant decrease in
`mucosal surface area, most prominent in the proximal
`colon (Fig. 4A). In contrast, h[Gly2]GLP-2 administra-
`tion to mice with DS colitis was associated with an
`
`6
`
`

`

`H[GLY2]GLP-2 IN A MURINE MODEL OF COLITIS
`
`G85
`
`increase in mucosal area that was most significant in
`the proximal and middle colon (Fig. 4A, P ⬍ 0.05 for
`proximal and middle colon, DS-h[Gly2]GLP-2- vs. DS-
`saline-treated mice).
`To further quantify the extent of epithelial disruption
`in mice with colitis, the presence or absence of intact
`epithelial mucosa was scored in multiple sections. Mice
`treated with h[Gly2]GLP-2 consistently exhibited a
`
`Fig. 5. Myeloperoxidase (MPO) activity normalized to protein con-
`tent in colon of BALB/c control and DS mice treated with saline or
`h[Gly2]GLP-2. *P ⬍ 0.05 for control vs. mice with DS colitis.
`
`greater proportion of intact mucosal epithelium, and
`this difference was statistically significant for both
`proximal and distal colon (Fig. 4B, P ⬍ 0.05 for proximal
`and distal colon, DS-h[Gly2]GLP-2- vs. DS-saline-
`treated mice). Furthermore, the percentage of histologi-
`cal sections in the proximal colon exhibiting a pathologi-
`cal index (Fig. 4C) of two or three was greater in
`saline-treated mice with DS colitis compared with mice
`treated with h[Gly2]GLP-2 (Fig. 4C, P ⬍ 0.05 for grade
`II lesions, DS-h[Gly2]GLP-2- vs. DS-saline-treated
`mice). Analysis of MPO activity as an indirect indicator
`of neutrophil infiltration demonstrated a marked induc-
`tion of MPO activity in the colon of BALB/c mice with
`DS colitis. No significant differences in the relative
`levels of MPO activity were detected in the colons from
`h[Gly2]GLP-2-treated control or DS mice (Fig. 5).
`To determine the effects of DS colitis and h[Gly2]GLP-
`2 treatment on gene expression in the small and large
`bowel, RNA prepared from CD1 mice in experiment A
`was analyzed by Northern blotting and RT-PCR. Al-
`though the levels of SGLT-1 mRNA were similar in
`jejunum and ileum from CD1 control mice and mice
`
`Fig. 4. A: mucosal surface area in CD1 mouse colon, experiment A.
`*P ⬍ 0.05 for saline-treated vs. either h[Gly2]GLP-2-treated, 5%
`DS-saline-treated, or 5% DS-h[Gly2]GLP-2-treated mice. #P ⬍ 0.05
`for h[Gly2]GLP-2- vs. 5% DS-saline-treated mice. ⫹P ⬍ 0.05 for 5%
`DS-saline- vs. 5% DS-h[Gly2]GLP-2-treated mice. B: mucosal integ-
`rity (solid bar) expressed as percentage of total circumferential
`mucosal area in proximal, middle, or distal colon of CD1 mice,
`experiment A, receiving 5% oral DS and saline or h[Gly2]GLP-2. *P ⬍
`0.05 for saline- vs. h[Gly2]GLP-2-treated mice. C: severity of ulcer-
`ative colitis in histological sections (n ⫽ 27–36 bowel sections) from
`proximal colon scored for degree of inflammation as described in
`METHODS. *P⬍0.05 for DS-saline- vs. DS-h[Gly
`2]GLP-2-treated
`CD1 mice, experiment A. Percentage score refers to percentage of total
`sections examined with normal scores and with grades I–III colitis.
`
`7
`
`

`

`G86
`
`H[GLY2]GLP-2 IN A MURINE MODEL OF COLITIS
`
`Fig. 6. A: Northern blot analysis of proglucagon, sodium-dependent glucose trans-
`porter 1 (SGLT-1), interleukin-1␣, 18S RNA, and keratinocyte growth factor (KGF) in
`small intestine and colon of CD1 mice. S, saline. Relative densitometric values for
`Northern blots from 3 separate mice are shown in B. Relative densitometric signals
`were not corrected for variations in 18S RNA as latter signals were highly comparable
`(⬍10% variation) in each lane.
`
`with DS colitis, a slight decrease in SGLT-1 mRNA was
`detected in the colon of mice with DS colitis, consistent
`with destruction of epithelial mucosa (Fig. 6, A and B).
`In contrast, IL-1 mRNA transcripts, indirect markers
`of intestinal inflammation, were markedly induced in
`the colon of mice with DS colitis (Fig. 6, A and B),
`and the levels of IL-1 mRNA transcripts were clearly
`lower in the colons of mice with colitis treated with
`h[Gly2]GLP-2. The reduction in IL-1 mRNA in
`h[Gly2]GLP-2-treated mice is unlikely due to a dilu-
`
`tional effect secondary to increased bowel mass, as we
`did not observe corresponding reductions in the colonic
`levels of proglucagon, SGLT-1, KGF, and 18S RNAs in
`RNA analyses from the same mice.
`Because both KGF and TGF-␣ have been shown to have
`therapeutic activity in experimental models of intestinal
`inflammation (22, 58) we examined whether the effects of
`h[Gly2]GLP-2 treatment might be mediated in part via
`local induction of these growth factors. Northern blot
`analysis detected induction of colonic KGF gene expres-
`
`8
`
`

`

`H[GLY2]GLP-2 IN A MURINE MODEL OF COLITIS
`
`G87
`
`Fig. 6. C: RT-PCR analysis of transforming growth factor-␣ (TGF-␣) gene
`expression in colon of CD1 mice. Data from 3 different groups of mice are
`shown, following PCR for 26 cycles as described in METHODS. The 28S and
`18S ribosomal bands from each RNA sample used for PCR are shown. kb,
`Relative migration position from electrophoresed size markers of RT-
`PCR products. D: tissue levels of immunoreactive GLP-2 in CD1 mouse
`ileum and colon. *P ⬍ 0.05 for saline-treated vs. 5% DS-saline-treated or
`5% DS-h[Gly2]GLP-2-treated mice. #P ⬍ 0.05 for h[Gly2]GLP-2-treated
`vs. 5% DS-saline-treated or 5% DS-h[Gly2]GLP-2-treated mice.
`
`sion in mice with colitis (Fig. 6A). Nevertheless, there
`were no significant differences in the levels of intestinal
`KGF mRNA in saline- vs. h[Gly2]GLP-2-treated mice
`with DS colitis (Fig. 6A). The levels of TGF-␣ mRNA
`transcripts were easily detectable and comparable in
`control saline- and h[Gly2]GLP-2-treated healthy mice
`(Fig. 6C). In contrast, a marked reduction of TGF-␣
`mRNA was observed in colon RNA from both saline-
`and h[Gly2]GLP-2-treated mice with DS colitis, consis-
`tent with the presence of significant destruction of the
`intestinal epithelium and/or toxicity from DS on TGF-␣-
`producing cell types. Thus no evidence for h[Gly2]GLP-
`2-mediated induction of intestinal KGF or TGF-␣ gene
`expression was observed in these experiments.
`Because previous studies have suggested that some
`forms of small bowel injury are associated with increased
`levels of circulating enteroglucagons (4), we measured
`tissue levels of immunoreactive GLP-2 in the ileum and
`colon and levels of proglucagon mRNA transcripts in
`jejunum, ileum, and colon of control and DS-treated mice.
`No significant change in the levels of proglucagon mRNA
`transcripts was detected in the jejunum, ileum, or colon of
`mice with DS colitis (Fig. 6, A and B). Immunoreactive
`GLP-2 levels were not increased in the ileum; however,
`a significant decrease in the levels of GLP-2 was
`observed in the colon of DS-treated mice, possibly
`
`consistent with the colitis-associated destruction of the
`mucosal epithelium and/or increased secretion and
`decreased storage of tissue GLP-2 (Fig. 6D, P ⬍ 0.05,
`control vs. DS-treated mice). In contrast to the reduc-
`tion in tissue levels of GLP-2, analysis of the levels of
`circulating GLP-2 demonstrated increased levels in
`mice with DS colitis (Fig. 7), with a significant increase
`in plasma GLP-2 observed in the DS mice treated with
`h[Gly2]GLP-2 (P ⬍ 0.05, h[Gly2]GLP-2-treated mice
`without colitis vs. h[Gly2]GLP-2-treated mice with DS
`colitis).
`
`DISCUSSION
`
`The mechanisms responsible for the development of
`ulcerative colitis in human patients remain incom-
`pletely understood and likely include an inappropriate
`immune response to dietary or microbial antigens,
`ultimately leading to cytokine activation and epithelial
`damage. The reproducible induction of experimental
`colitis in rodents following exposure to DS provides an
`opportunity to study the therapeutic efficacy of specific
`interventions on disease progression as assessed by
`histopathology of inflamed tissues in vivo. DS-induced
`rodent colitis pathologically resembles human ulcer-
`ative colitis, with development of mucosal edema, crypt
`erosions, and abscesses, leading to polyp formation and
`ultimately, progression to dysplasia and adenocarci-
`
`9
`
`

`

`G88
`
`H[GLY2]GLP-2 IN A MURINE MODEL OF COLITIS
`
`illustrated by increased ICAM-1 expression in inflamed
`colon and antisense oligonucleotides against ICAM-1
`RNA inhibited ICAM-1 expressi

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket