throbber
bidnessetc.com
`
`http://www.bidnessetc.com/21468-news-analysis-biotech-sell-off-drags-nasdaq-100-down-to-2-year-lows/
`
`Biotech Sell Off Drags NASDAQ-100 Down To 2-Year Lows
`
`Yesterday’s drop in the Nasdaq Composite Index (IXIC) marked the greatest one-day drop in the index since
`November 2011. Momentum stocks in the internet and biotech space were once again responsible for the 3.1% drop.
`
`Biotech saw major selling pressure yesterday; 12 of the 30 greatest price declines were in biotech companies. The
`NASDAQ Biotech Index (NBI) was down 5.64%, putting its year-to-date performance down 2.2%.
`
`The iShares NASDAQ Biotechnology Index (ETF) (IBB) fell 5.61% while the SPDR S&P Biotech (ETF) (XBI) was
`worse off with a 6.46% decline. The selloff is part of the overall market selloff that happened with investors reducing
`stakes in high-growth biotech stocks to move to safer, less volatile investments.
`
`The second round of selloffs in less than a month is an indication that the biotech-space investors have turned
`bearish. Sell side analysts, however, are holding onto their strong ratings on large cap biotech stocks, which include
`Biogen Idec Inc. (BIIB), Celgene Corporation (CELG), Gilead Sciences, Inc. (GILD), and Amgen, Inc. (AMGN). Two of
`these stocks – Biogen and Amgen – recorded declines of over 4% in trading yesterday, and the other two – Celgene
`and Gilead – were down more than 7%.
`
`On February 25, 2014, the biotech industry hit its peak, before the decline set in. The SPDR S&P Biotech (ETF) (XBI)
`has shed 22.05% since, while the iShares NASDAQ Biotechnology Index (ETF) (IBB) – the largest biotech ETF – is
`down 18.8% in the same time-frame. Such large declines may give rise to more concerns among investors and the
`downward momentum could potentially continue.
`
`The fears, though, are likely to subside given that biotech stocks did see high growth but they are not as expensive as
`when the bubble burst at the turn of the century. Also, Gilead’s drug-pricing issue, that had stoked fears among
`investors, could also subside, as CVS Caremark (CVS) released its insight report detailing that specialty medication –
`which most biotechs produce – saw a 15.6% growth, while prescription drug trend rose 3.8%. CVS identified
`increased utilization and price inflation as key growth drivers.
`
`The Affordable Care Act, or Obamacare, has increased the number of people who will be able to get prescription
`medication – which would be another driver for the growth in the use of specialty medicine.
`
`The market, however, still has room to drop further. Below is the list of Biotech stocks that lost out the most yesterday.
`
`Page 1
`
`

`
`
`
`% Decline
`18.34%
`13.45%
`13.18%
`12.73%
`12.44%
`12.11%
`11.8%
`11.69%
`11.64%
`11.21%
`11.09%
`11.15%
`7.32%
`.5.6%_
`
`
`
`.
`
`Biotech Comgany/Index/ETF
`Regado Bloscie nces (RGDO)
`Kind ered Biosciences (KiN}
`PTC Therapeutics. Inc.(PTCT}
`Heat Biologics. Inc. (HTBX)
`Adamas Pharmaceuticals,|nc. (ADMS)
`Alnylam Pharmaceutical. Inc (ALNY)
`Nuralstern. Inc. (CU R)
`Newlinkfienetics Corporation (NLNK)
`Intercept Pharmaceutical (ICPT)
`Chemocentryx Inc (CCXIJ
`Vanda pharmaceutical (VNDA)
`Proshares Ultra Nasdag Biotech (ETF) (BIB)
`Gilead Sciences (GILD)
`ishares NASDAQ Biotechnology Index (ETF) (IBB)
`
`
`
`Celgene Corporation (CELG)
`
`Amgen, Inc (AMGN)
`NASDAQ Biotechnoiogy NBI
`SDDR SEP Biotech (ETF) (XB|)
`
`
`
`I
`
`l
`
`,_
`
`__
`"""
`
`
`3
`
`..|..
`
`'
`.
`5.64%
`,"‘6.4B%
`
`BIDNESS
`
`Page 2
`
`Page 2

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket