throbber
GASTROENTEROLOGY 2006;130:S5–S15
`
`Etiology and Initial Management of Short Bowel Syndrome
`
`ALAN L. BUCHMAN
`Division of Gastroenterology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
`
`The normal human small intestine ranges between 3
`
`and 8 m in length, depending on whether measure-
`ment is made by radiologic or surgical techniques or at
`autopsy when the intestine may be desicated.1–5 Short
`bowel syndrome is defined in adults as ⬍200 cm of small
`intestine. Although usually acquired because of one or
`more enterectomies, short bowel syndrome may also be
`congenitally acquired. Nutrient, electrolyte, and fluid
`absorption is proportional to the amount of residual
`intestine. The degree of intestinal function is better
`described in terms of energy absorption/loss rather than
`length of residual intestine.6 Intestinal failure may be
`defined as the inability to sustain adequate nutritional,
`electrolyte, or hydrational status in the absence of spe-
`cialized nutritional support. This requires an increase in
`oral intake because absorption is compromised. Clini-
`cally, nutrient assimilation is a function of intake and
`absorption. As such, some patients with short bowel
`syndrome will not have sufficient loss of functional ca-
`pacity as to develop intestinal failure. Significant indi-
`vidual variability in jejunal absorption efficiency may be
`encountered.7
`The patients with the greatest risk for development of
`dehydration, generalized protein-calorie malnutrition,
`and multiple nutrient deficiencies are those with a duo-
`denostomy or jejunoileal anastomosis and ⬍35 cm of
`residual small intestine; jejunocolic or ileocoloic anasto-
`mosis, and ⬍60 cm of residual small intestine; or end
`jejunostomy with ⬍115 cm of residual small intes-
`tine.6,8 –11 Those patients with residual colon in continu-
`ity will have enhanced energy and fluid absorption.
`Hence, such patients can tolerate greater loss of small
`intestine and retain their nutritional autonomy.
`
`Incidence and Prevalence of Short
`Bowel Syndrome
`It is unclear how many individuals in the United
`States suffer from short bowel syndrome, but, based on
`the numbers in Europe, the incidence is probably ap-
`proximately 2 individuals per million.12 More recent
`data from 1993 indicated that the incidence and preva-
`lence of home parenteral nutrition, for which short bowel
`syndrome was the most prevalent indication, had in-
`
`creased slightly to 2 or 3 per year per million inhabitants
`and 4 per year per million, respectively.13,14 The most
`recent European survey, in 1997, indicated that the
`incidence of home total parenteral nutrition (TPN) had
`remained approximately 3 per million and that the prev-
`alence had increased to 4 per million.15 The largest single
`group of patients who received home TPN were those
`with short bowel syndrome (35%). In comparison, the
`most recent data for incidence and prevalence in the
`United States is from 1992. At that time, it was esti-
`mated based on extrapolated data from the Oley Foun-
`dation Home TPN Registry that approximately 40,000
`patients required TPN each year.16 Approximately 26%
`of the patients in the Oley Registry had short bowel
`syndrome, although some patients with a primary TPN
`indication of malignancy or radiation enteritis may have
`had short bowel syndrome as well. Patients with short
`bowel syndrome who did not require home TPN or were
`successfully weaned from home TPN are not reflected in
`these statistics. Approximately half of the short bowel
`patients who initially require TPN can be weaned off of
`TPN successfully in optimal settings.8 Therefore, the
`number of patients with short bowel syndrome may be
`substantially greater than previously estimated. A regis-
`try of short bowel patients, including those who require
`TPN permanently, transiently, and not at all, should be
`implemented.
`
`Etiology of Short Bowel Syndrome
`Short bowel syndrome may be a congenital or
`acquired condition. Infants may be born with congenital
`jejunal or ileal atresia. Otherwise, short bowel syndrome
`results from surgical resection of bowel. This is usually
`related to multiple resections for recurrent Crohn’s dis-
`ease, massive enterectomy made necessary because of a
`catastrophic vascular event such as mesenteric arterial
`embolism, venous thrombosis, volvulus, trauma, or tu-
`mor resection in adults, and, in children, gastroschisis,
`
`Abbreviations used in this paper: GLP, glucagon-like peptide; ORS,
`oral rehydration solution; TPN, total parenteral nutrition.
`© 2006 by the American Gastroenterological Association
`0016-5085/06/$32.00
`doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2005.07.063
`
`Page 1
`
`

`
`S6 ALAN BUCHMAN
`
`GASTROENTEROLOGY Vol. 130, No. 2
`
`necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC), volvulus, and extensive
`aganglionosis. Functional short bowel syndrome may
`also occur in cases of severe malabsorption in which the
`bowel length is often intact. Such conditions may in-
`clude chronic intestinal pseudo-obstruction syndrome,
`refractory sprue, radiation enteritis, and congenital villus
`atrophy. Severe nutrient and fluid malabsorption occurs
`following extensive small intestinal resection. Patients
`with less than 100 cm of jejunum remaining generally
`have a net secretory response to food.17
`Patients can be grouped into 2 distinct subgroups:
`those with intact colon in continuity and those without
`colon in continuity. The colon becomes an important
`digestive organ in patients with short bowel syndrome.
`Sodium, water, and some amino acids are absorbed in the
`colon9,18 –20 as well as energy from absorbed short-chain
`fatty acids.
`
`Postresectional Adaptation
`The intestine adapts as well to ensure more effi-
`cient absorption per unit length. Following massive en-
`terectomy, the intestine hypertrophies, and nutrient ab-
`sorption becomes more efficient. Although there are
`limited human data, observations in patients with mas-
`sive enterectomy as well as in the functional short bowel
`patient (JI-bypass) indicate that the intestine lengthens
`some, but more importantly, diameter and villus height
`increase with a resultant increase in absorptive sur-
`face.21–24 This process may evolve over 1 or 2 years.6,9,25
`Patients may be taught to adapt to their decreased ab-
`sorption as well by dramatically increasing their food
`intake (hyperphagia).
`The presence or absence of the colon and ileocecal
`valve;
`location (jejunum versus ileum), health, and
`length of residual bowel; mucosal blood flow; patient
`age; and comorbid conditions such as Crohn’s disease,
`radiation enteritis, carcinoma, or pseudo-obstruction are
`important determinants in the functional adaptation pro-
`cess and clinical outcome.6,26,27 Although the length of
`remaining bowel necessary to prevent dependence on
`TPN is approximately 100 cm in the absence of an intact
`and functional colon, or 60 cm in the presence of a
`completely functional colon,6,9,28 the degree of adapta-
`tion and TPN dependence may be highly individualized.
`Adaptation to full enteral nutrition has been reported
`with as little as 10 cm of residual intestine in infants.25
`Patients with a jejunostomy are at increased risk for TPN
`dependence, and those with a jejunal-ileal anastomosis
`are less likely to be TPN dependent.
`Animal models have suggested that enteroglucagon,
`glucagon peptide II, epidermal growth factor, growth
`
`hormone, cholecystokinin, gastrin, insulin, and neuro-
`tensin are involved in postresection intestinal adapta-
`tion.29 There are little data on the role of either increased
`endogenous hormonal release or exogenous hormone sup-
`plementation during the intestinal adaptation phase in
`humans.
`Residual ileum is able to adapt and to assume the role
`of macronutrient absorption when jejunum has been
`resected. However, the specialized cells of the terminal
`ileum in which vitamin B-12/intrinsic factor receptors
`are located and in which bile salts are reabsorbed cannot
`be replaced by jejunal hypertrophy.
`
`Medical Therapy of Short Bowel
`Syndrome
`The goal of medical therapy is for the patient to
`resume work and a normal lifestyle, or as normal of one
`as possible. This is undertaken via the use of specific
`measures to decrease gradually the requirement for TPN
`and, at best, to eliminate its need. The most important
`aspects of the medical management of the patient with
`short bowel syndrome are to provide adequate nutrition,
`including both macro- and micronutrients, to prevent
`energy malnutrition and specific nutrient deficiencies, to
`provide sufficient fluid to prevent dehydration, and to
`correct and prevent acid-base disturbances. Most macro-
`nutrients, including carbohydrate, nitrogen, and fat, are
`absorbed within the first 100 cm and up to 150 cm of
`jejunum.30
`
`Macronutrient Assimilation and Dietary
`Therapy
`
`Typically, patients who have undergone massive
`enterectomy require TPN for the first 7–10 days. The
`immediate goals during this period are survival and
`hemodynamic stability. Nutritional therapy should not
`be introduced until the patient is hemodynamically sta-
`ble and fluid management issues are relatively stable.
`Patients should be provided approximately 25–35 kcal/
`kg/day and 1.0 –1.5 kg/day of protein. It remains con-
`troversial whether intake should be based on actual body
`weight or ideal body weight.31 Enteral nutrition should
`be started as soon as possible once hemodynamic stability
`has been achieved; standard enteral formula is recom-
`mended. Enteral nutrition should be instituted gradually
`as tolerated. Once patients are able to eat, they should be
`encouraged to eat a regular diet but modified as de-
`scribed below. Patients should also be encouraged to
`adapt their diet to eat substantially more than what was
`usual prior to their catastrophic event (hyperphagia).32
`Separation of liquids and solids has no effect on macro-
`
`Page 2
`
`

`
`February Supplement 2006
`
`CHARACTERISTICS OF SHORT BOWEL SYNDROME S7
`
`nutrient, electrolyte, or mineral absorption or fecal vol-
`ume or fecal weight.19
`
`Proteins/Amino Acids
`
`Dietary protein is first digested by pancreatic,
`gastric, and intestinal proteases and then absorbed as di-
`and tripeptides. Therefore, it was reasoned that if dietary
`protein were provided in a predigested form, it would be
`more readily absorbed. However, absorption of nitroge-
`neous macronutrients (or proteins) is least affected by the
`decreased intestinal absorptive surface in patients with
`short bowel syndrome. Therefore, the utility of peptide-
`based diets in such patients is theoretically without
`merit.
`McIntyre et al fed 7 patients with an end-jejunostomy
`(60 –150 cm residual small bowel) a peptide-based or an
`essentially isocaloric and isonitrogenous polymeric for-
`mula. Energy, carbohydrate, nitrogen, fat, electrolyte,
`fluid, and mineral absorption and stool weight were
`similar regardless of the enteral formula provided.33 Un-
`controlled data from Levy et al support these findings.34
`A small study of 6 patients (90 –150 cm of residual
`jejunum and end-jejunostomy) reported by Cosnes et al,
`however, suggested that nitrogen absorption may be
`modestly improved with the use of a peptide-based diet,
`although similar to previous studies, energy, other ma-
`cronutrient, electrolyte, mineral, and fluid absorption
`were unaffected.35 These studies were all very small, the
`study populations somewhat heterogeneous, and the var-
`ious peptides used in the formulas differed significantly,
`as did the type and amount of fat (long-chain triglycer-
`ides vs medium-chain triglycerides). It is therefore dif-
`ficult to make definitive comparisons among studies.
`The amino acid glutamine, together with glucose, is
`the preferred fuel for the small intestinal enterocyte.36
`Rodent TPN models suggested that either parenteral or
`enteral glutamine supplements could effect more rapid
`and more significant bowel adaptation following massive
`enterectomy.37,38 Therefore, it was thought that glu-
`tamine supplementation in humans would have a similar
`effect. Although an early case series of 10 patients who
`were beyond the usual 1–2 year adaptation period sug-
`gested that glutamine, combined with growth hormone
`supplementation, and a high complex carbohydrate diet
`could result in decreased stool output and increased
`absorption of energy, protein, carbohydrate, sodium, and
`water,39 2 subsequent, double-blinded, randomized pla-
`cebo-controlled trials failed to confirm any of these ef-
`fects.40,41 In addition, Scolapio et al showed that glu-
`tamine and growth hormone supplementation did not
`lead to morphologic changes in the intestine.40 Glu-
`tamine-supplemented oral rehydration solution (see fluid
`
`and electrolyte management) was associated with de-
`creased Na absorption and a trend toward decreased fluid
`absorption in a small controlled trial in 6 patients.41 All
`of the patients studied by Byrne et al39 had colon in
`continuity; it is likely the treatment-associated increase
`in energy absorption was related solely to the increased
`complex carbohydrate diet as discussed above. Treatment
`with growth hormone and glutamine in the setting of
`short bowel syndrome has been associated with significantly
`increased extracellular fluid and peripheral edema.40,42,43
`A recent study reported by Seguy et al showed that
`low-dose growth hormone (0.05 mg/kg/day) was associ-
`ated with a modest increase in carbohydrate and nitrogen
`absorption.44 A recent randomized, placebo (glutamine)-
`controlled study indicated growth hormone administra-
`tion, when used outside the natural adaptation period,
`led to the ability to reduce parenteral fluid and nutrition
`requirements, although absorptive studies were not un-
`dertaken.45 Neither growth hormone nor glutamine have
`been studied in humans when used in the initial 1–2-
`year periadaptative period. Therefore, treatment with
`glutamine and/or growth hormone cannot be recom-
`mended at the present time. However, it may be that use
`of such exogenous growth factors may have their greatest
`utility if used during the normal adaptive period. There
`are no human studies to test this hypothesis.
`
`Lipid
`
`Lipid digestion may be impaired because of im-
`paired solubility because micelle formation will be im-
`paired when ileal bile salt malabsorption occurs in the
`setting of ileal resection (⬎100 cm).46 Treatment with
`ox bile supplements has been attempted in 3 patients in
`an attempt to increase duodenal bile salt concentration to
`stimulate micellar lipid solubilization.47– 49 This therapy
`has been associated with significantly increased fecal
`volume, at least in those patients with intact colon. A
`preliminary, open-labeled study of 4 patients (2 with
`colon in continuity) indicated that treatment with the
`conjugated bile acid cholylsarcosine (6 g/day) was asso-
`ciated with an increase in fat absorption of 17 ⫾ 3 g/day
`without any effect on stool wet weight.50 Cholylsarcosine
`is a conjugated bile acid and is resistant to colonic
`bacterial deconjugation. Another case series of 4 subjects
`had similar findings.51 However, 1 of the 4 patients
`experienced a significant increase in wet stool output,
`and nausea developed in another patient. Cholestyramine
`should not be used in patients with ⬎100 cm of ileal
`resection because it may actually worsen steatorrhea be-
`cause of the binding of dietary lipid.52
`Regardless of whether a high- or low-fat diet is used,
`the percentage of fat absorption remains stable, and stool
`
`Page 3
`
`

`
`S8 ALAN BUCHMAN
`
`GASTROENTEROLOGY Vol. 130, No. 2
`
`weight is unaffected by the fat content of meals.53,54
`However, because of the energy density of fat (9.0 kcal/g)
`when compared with carbohydrate (4.0 kcal/g), it is an
`important dietary energy source. In addition, in short
`bowel syndrome patients, up to 65% of dietary carbo-
`hydrate may be malabsorbed and lost in the feces without
`degradation by colonic bacteria.32
`A mixed long-chain triglyceride:medium-chain tri-
`glyceride (LCT:MCT) diet was studied in 19 patients.
`Those patients with intact colon absorbed 96% ⫾ 3% of
`C8 fatty acids and 87% ⫾ 6% of C10 fatty acids, and
`those patients without colon absorbed 63% ⫾ 25% of
`C8 and 57% ⫾ 28% of C10, (P ⫽ .007 for C8 and P ⫽
`.004 for C10).55 MCT contains 8.3 kcal/g. Energy absorp-
`tion (approximately 2.1 MJ/day; 500 kcal/day) was sig-
`nificantly increased in patients with colon, although the
`LCT:MCT diet did not result in increased energy absorp-
`tion when compared with the LCT-based diet in patients
`with an end-jejunostomy or ileostomy. These patient also
`had increased fecal output with a mixed LCT:MCT diet.
`Some, but not all LCT, can be replaced by MCT in the
`diet because the essential fatty acid linoleic acid is a
`constituent of LCT and is not found in MCT. Excessive
`MCT intake may result in nausea, vomiting, and ketosis.
`In a short bowel patient eating 10.5 MJ/day (2500
`kcal/day), approximately 1.5–3 MJ/day (360 –720 kcal/
`day; 40 – 80 g) of LCT can be replaced with MCT.
`
`Carbohydrates
`
`The proximal jejunum rarely requires resection in
`patients that undergo massive enterectomy. Most intes-
`tinal dissacharidases are present in highest concentration
`in the very proximal small intestine, and, hence, patients
`with more distal resection are not likely to benefit from
`a lactose-free diet. In a study of 14 short bowel patients,
`a lactose-free diet was compared with a diet containing
`20 g/day of lactose (still with ⬍4 g milk).56 Lactose
`absorption, breath hydrogen, subjective symptoms of
`flatulence, and diarrhea were similar regardless of the
`diet. These data confirmed the findings of an earlier
`controlled study in 17 short bowel patients, which found
`that lactose absorption was enhanced when provided in
`yogurt rather than via milk.57 Regardless, in the absence
`of significant jejunal resection, patients with short bowel
`syndrome should not be provided lactose-restricted diets.
`Such diets are also generally low in calcium. Even pa-
`tients with an end-jejunostomy will generally tolerate a
`glass of milk (20 –25 g lactose).57
`
`The Role of the Complex Carbohydrate Diet
`
`and some
`Soluble nonstarch polysaccharides
`starches58 are not generally absorbed by the small intes-
`
`tine. Soluble fiber dissolves in water and is found pri-
`marily in oatmeal, oat bran, psyllium (Metamucil, Proc-
`tor & Gamble, Cincinatti, OH; Konsyl, Konsyl
`Pharmaceuticals, Easton, MD), barley, artichokes, straw-
`berries, legumes, prunes, grapefruit, and squash in de-
`scending order of concentration. Soluble fiber and
`starches pass undigested into the colon in which they are
`fermented by enteric bacteria into hydrogen and methane
`(hence patient “gas” complaints) but also into short-
`chain fatty acids (SCFAs), including butyrate, proprion-
`ate, and acetate. SCFAs are the preferred fuel for colono-
`cytes.59 Therefore, the colon becomes a digestive organ in
`patients with short bowel syndrome. Approximately 75
`mmol SCFA are produced from 10 g unabsorbed carbo-
`hydrate.60 Patients with short bowel syndrome but intact
`colon in continuity were able to decrease fecal energy loss
`by 1.3–3.1 MJ/day (310 –740 kcal) when they were fed
`a diet consisting of 60% carbohydrates.61 Colonic me-
`tabolism of unabsorbed carbohydrate was indicated by
`decreased fecal carbohydrate losses in the patients with
`colon in continuity. The intact colon may absorb up to
`2.2– 4.9 MJ (525–1170 kcal) of energy daily from di-
`etary fiber.9,10,61 Colonic energy absorption may also
`increase some during the postresection adaptation phase,
`related to increased colonic bacterial carbohydrate fer-
`mentation.11,62 The increased fermentation may result
`from increased colonic bacteria and/or an increase in the
`concentration or activity of various enzymes including
`␤-galactosidase during the adaptation period.62 Because
`SCFAs stimulate sodium and water absorption,63 pa-
`tients might be expected to have decreased fecal fluid and
`sodium loss as adaptation progresses, although this has
`not been observed clinically.61
`
`Vitamins
`
`Micronutrients often require supplementation. It
`is unusual for water-soluble vitamin deficiencies to de-
`velop in short bowel patients in the absence of TPN
`(except in those who have proximal jejunostomies or
`duodenostomies) because these are absorbed in the prox-
`imal jejunum. Thiamine deficiency has been described,
`especially during a recent parenteral vitamin shortage.64
`Patients may present with Wernicke’s encephalopathy,
`beriberi, and severe metabolic alkalosis.65 Whole blood
`thiamine concentration may not be indicative of defi-
`ciency as it reflects recent nutritional intake. Erythrocyte
`transketolase activity should be measured and empiric
`therapy begun with 100 mg parenteral thiamine daily.
`Biotin deficiency has rarely been reported in patients
`with short bowel syndrome.66 Scaly dermatitis, alopecia,
`lethargy, hypotonia, and lactic acidosis have been de-
`scribed. Therapy consists of parenteral biotin supplemen-
`
`Page 4
`
`

`
`February Supplement 2006
`
`CHARACTERISTICS OF SHORT BOWEL SYNDROME S9
`
`tation of 0.3–1 mg daily, although this is not commer-
`cially available in the United States. Vitamin B-12
`supplementation is required (300 ␮g/month subcutane-
`ously) in patients who have had a ⬎60-cm terminal
`ileum resected.67 Folic acid is provided as a constituent of
`most oral and parenteral multivitamins. Folate deficiency
`may develop in patients with proximal jejunal resec-
`tions.68 These patients should receive 1 mg folate daily.
`Fat-soluble vitamin deficiency (A, D, and E) is more
`common in patients with short bowel syndrome because
`of fat maldigestion related to decreased bile salt reab-
`sorption and decreased micelle formation.69 Cholestyra-
`mine may cause fat-soluble vitamin deficiency because of
`its binding of bile salts.70 Night blindness and xeroph-
`thalmia have been described in short bowel syndrome.71
`If not recognized, vitamin A deficiency may progress to
`corneal ulceration and later permanent visual loss may
`develop. The serum vitamin A concentration should be
`monitored in patients who do not require parenteral
`vitamin supplementation. If a low serum vitamin A
`concentration is detected, therapy should be started with
`10,000 –50,000 units daily, administered either orally or
`parenterally.
`Vitamin D deficiency manifests in osteomalacia. Usu-
`ally, dietary intake is a relatively unimportant source of
`vitamin D because the majority is endogenously synthe-
`sized from 7-dehydrocholesterol via ultraviolet light.72,73
`However, because enterohepatic circulation is disrupted
`in patients who have undergone significant ileal resec-
`tions, deficiency may result.74
`Vitamin E deficiency may manifest in hemolysis75 and
`various neurologic deficits.76 Because serum vitamin E
`concentration reflects serum total lipid concentration,
`which may be low in short bowel patients who have
`steatorrhea, low serum vitamin E concentration alone
`may not be indicative of a deficient state; the serum
`vitamin E:total lipid ratio should be calculated.77,78
`Most vitamin K is synthesized by colonic bacteria
`(60%),79 although dietary intake accounts for approxi-
`mately 40% of requirements; deficiency is therefore un-
`common in patients with intact colon. However, vitamin
`K deficiency is frequent in patients who have no residual
`colon or who have taken broad-spectrum antibiotics re-
`cently. The requirement is approximately 1 mg daily.79
`Vitamin K was not a constituent in adult multivitamins
`for TPN until recently, although it has in children.
`
`Trace Metals
`
`Significant amounts of zinc and selenium are lost
`with diarrhea. A significant amount of zinc is also lost in
`small bowel effluent (12 mg/L small intestinal fluid and
`16 mg/L stool).80 Zinc deficiency has been associated
`
`with growth abnormalities,81 delayed wound healing,82
`and cellular immunity dysfunction.83 Patients in whom
`zinc deficiency is suspected should be treated empirically
`with oral zinc sulfate (220 – 440 mg daily) or parenteral
`zinc supplements if they require TPN. Serum and leu-
`kocyte measurements of zinc concentration, although
`helpful, may be unreliable.84 Selenium deficiency has
`been associated with cardiomyopathy85; peripheral neu-
`ropathy, proximal muscle weakness, and pain86; whiten-
`ing of the hair; and macrocytosis.87 Serum selenium is a
`reliable indicator of selenium status, and, if low, oral or
`parenteral supplementation should be provided. Al-
`though there are 3 reported possible cases of chromium
`deficiency in patients requiring long-term TPN,88 defi-
`ciency has not been reported in short bowel patients who
`do not require TPN, and, therefore, routine supplemen-
`tation is not recommended. Chromium is a necessary
`cofactor for insulin’s effects in peripheral tissue.89 How-
`ever, available evidence suggests that there is sufficient
`chromium present in the TPN solutions as a contami-
`nant, and supplemental chromium may result in the
`possibility of nephrotoxicity.90 Copper deficiency is very
`rare in the patient with short bowel syndrome. Defi-
`ciency may result in microcytic anemia, neuropathy, and
`decreased fertility.91
`
`Medication Absorption
`
`Medication absorption is often impaired, just as is
`nutrient absorption in patients with short bowel syn-
`drome, although significant interpatient variability may
`be observed. The oral or enteral route for medication
`delivery should be used whenever possible to avoid ad-
`ditional manipulations of the TPN catheter, which are
`associated with increased infection risk. The degree to
`which a medication is malabsorbed is dependent on the
`residual small bowel surface area and its health (for
`example, whether or not active Crohn’s disease is present)
`and morphologic and physiologic factors, including the
`presence or absence of the terminal ileum (especially
`important for vitamin B-12 and bile salt absorption,
`which are necessary for the absorption of lipid-soluble
`medications such as cyclosporin) or the presence of an
`acidic or alkaline environment (which may be caused by
`the use of H2 blockers in TPN or proton pump inhibi-
`tors). Many, but not all, medications are absorbed in the
`jejunum. Therefore, absorption will be minimally im-
`pacted for most medications in the absence of decreased
`intestinal transit time, which will decrease mucosal con-
`tact time. Most of the available data on oral medication
`absorption in patients with short bowel syndrome are in
`the form of isolated case reports.92 The sublingual route
`
`Page 5
`
`

`
`S10 ALAN BUCHMAN
`
`GASTROENTEROLOGY Vol. 130, No. 2
`
`for medication delivery may be preferable for some med-
`ications.
`
`Fluid and Electrolyte Management
`
`Massive enterectomy is associated with transient
`gastric hypersecretion and hypergastrinemia, generally
`lasting for up to 6 months following resection.93,94 H2-
`antagonists and proton pump inhibitors are useful to
`reduce gastric fluid secretion and, therefore, also reduce
`fluid losses during this period.17,95–97 However, because
`absorption of orally dosed medications may be impaired,
`either large doses or intravenous delivery may be re-
`quired. Although fluid losses are decreased, macronutri-
`ent and electrolyte absorption are not affected by the
`increased gastric secretion. Reduction of gastric acid
`output is also important to help prevent the deconjuga-
`tion of bile acids in the duodenum and decreased pan-
`creatic lipase excretion to enhance fat digestion.
`Fluid losses usually require chronic control with anti-
`motility agents such as loperamide hydrochloride or
`diphenoxylate. Typical doses are 4 –16 mg/day. If these
`are ineffective, especially in patients with no colon in
`continuity or those who have a minimum of residual
`jejunum or duodenum, codeine sulfate or tincture of
`opium may be necessary. The usual dose for codeine is
`15– 60 mg, 2 or 3 times daily. Rarely, patients will
`require treatment with octreotide. Octreotide’s mecha-
`nism of action is unclear, but it may be useful to slow
`intestinal transit time, which will increase water and
`sodium absorption.98,99 Daily jejunostomy volume was
`reduced from 8.1 ⫾ 1.8 to 4.8 ⫾ 0.7 L/day using a dose
`of 100 ␮g, subcutaneous, 3 times daily, of octreotide 30
`minutes before meals in one open-labeled study of 9
`patients with end-jejuonstomies.100 However, octreotide
`use does not result in TPN discontinuation, and it
`reduces splanchnic protein synthesis, thereby reducing
`mucosal protein incorporation and villus growth rate.
`Therefore postresectional intestinal adaptation may be
`impaired.101 A recent small study with the long-acting
`derivative of octreotide showed no measurable benefit.102
`Octreotide also increases the risk for cholelithiasis103 in a
`patient group already predisposed.104 It should therefore
`be reserved for patients with high-output jejunostomies
`in whom fluid and electrolyte management has proven
`difficult otherwise.
`rehydration solutions
`Glucose-polymer-based oral
`should be used to improve hydration and to decrease
`TPN fluid requirements in patients with residual jeju-
`num ending in a jejunostomy. Patients with ⬍100 cm of
`residual jejunum have significant risk for dehydration
`because they secrete more sodium (Na) and fluid than
`they orally consume.95 Because the jejunum is permeable
`
`to Na and chloride (Cl), passively absorbed solutions
`with high NaCl concentration are readily absorbed. Glu-
`cose promotes salt and water absorption by solvent drag
`and via stimulation of sodium-linked transport.105 How-
`ever, although Na and water are absorbed from hypo-
`tonic isotonic solutions delivered into the jejunum, ab-
`sorption is superior with more hypertonic fluids.106
`Therefore, hypotonic oral rehydration solutions may be
`of benefit in patients with an intact gastrointestinal tract
`and acute infectious diarrhea but may not be of use in the
`short bowel patients. Ingestion of hypotonic fluids may
`be associated with increased Na loss.107–109 Several com-
`mercially available oral rehydration solution (ORS) for-
`mulas are available, although probably the best, and
`certainly the least expensive, is that recommended by the
`World Health Organization (WHO).110 This can be
`formulated by dissolving the following in 1 liter of tap
`water: NaCl (2.5 g), KCl (1.5 g), Na2CO2 (2.5 g), and
`glucose (table sugar, 20 g). Only the KCl requires a
`physician prescription. Most, if not all, of the commer-
`cially available ORS have substantially less sodium (in
`the range of 45–50 mmol/l). Less NaCl may be added,
`but the optimal Na concentration should be at least
`90 –100 mmol/L, which is the usual concentration of
`small bowel effluent.20 Solutions with lower sodium
`concentrations result in increased sodium losses. There-
`fore, patients with short bowel syndrome should be
`cautioned against consumption of plain water and should
`be encouraged to drink ORS whenever they are thirsty.
`More recent evidence has shown that hypotonic (160
`mosm/kg) ORS leads to decreased intraluminal duode-
`nojejunal fluid flow rate in normal volunteers, although
`the effect on gastrointestinal fluid losses or fluid status in
`patients with short bowel has not been evaluated.111
`ORS may still be useful even in patients with residual
`colon in continuity, but, provided sufficient sodium is
`present in the diet, the amount of Na in the ORS may
`not be as critical because the colon readily absorbs Na
`and water against a steep electrochemical gradient.112
`The presence of glucose in the ORS is not critical in
`patients with no remaining jejunum, but who have re-
`sidual ileum, because ileal water absorption is not af-
`fected by the presence of glucose.113
`In addition to Na losses, significant quantities of
`magnesium (Mg) are lost in jejunal or ileal effluent.74
`Given that magnesium deficiency may develop despite a
`normal serum magnesium concentration, it is prudent to
`measure 24-hour urine Mg loss.114 The median 24-hour
`urine Mg in normal volunteers in one study was 127 mg
`(vs 19 mg for magnesium deficient short bowel pa-
`tients).74
`
`Page 6
`
`

`
`February Supplement 2006
`
`CHARACTERISTICS OF SHORT BOWEL SYNDROME S11
`
`Mg deficiency may cause calcium (Ca) deficiency be-
`cause hypomagnesemia impairs parathyroid hormone re-
`lease.115 In addition, the majority of patients with short
`bowel syndrome who do not require TPN are in negative
`Ca balance.116 Therefore, in the absence of TPN, oral Ca
`supplementation is recommended routinely (800 –1200
`mg/day). Mg replacement is problematic. Attempts with
`oral MgO or oral consumption of injectable Mg are
`generally not successful and have been associated with
`increased fecal loss because of their cathartic effect.117
`Although Mg gluconate is water soluble, Mg has not
`generally been a constituent of ORS. Therefore, some
`patients may require periodic parenteral Mg infusion
`despite the absence of a TPN or intravenous fluid re-
`quirement otherwise. Iron is absorbed in the duodenum
`and, therefore, in the absence of hemorrhage, is not
`routinely required as a supplement. Phosphorous defi-
`ciency is not well described in short bowel syndrome,
`and, therefore, supplementation is rarely, if ever, re-
`quired.
`
`Ph

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket