throbber
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`BMW OF NORTH AMERICA, LLC and
`BMW MANUFACTURING CO., LLC,
`
`
`Petitioners,
`
`
`v.
`
`INNOVATIVE DISPLAY TECHNOLOGIES LLC,
`
`
`Patent Owner.
`
`
`
`Inter Partes Review of U.S. Patent No. 6,886,956
`IPR2015-00934
`
`
`
`
`
`JOINT MOTION TO TERMINATE PROCEEDING
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`
`IPR2015-00934
`U.S. Patent No. 6,886,956
`
`
`
`
`Joint Motion to Terminate Proceeding
`
`Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. §317(a), Petitioners BMW of North America, LLC
`
`and BMW Manufacturing Co., LLC (“Petitioners”) and Patent Owner Innovative
`
`Display Technologies LLC (“Patent Owner”) jointly request termination of this
`
`inter partes review of U.S. Patent No. 6,886,956 (“the ʼ956 patent”).
`
`Termination is appropriate because the parties have entered into a settlement
`
`agreement that resolves all underlying disputes between the parties with respect to
`
`the ʼ956 patent, including the present inter partes review proceeding IPR2015-
`
`00934. The petition for review was filed on March 24, 2015. The Board has not
`
`entered a decision regarding institution. “Generally the Board expects that a
`
`proceeding will terminate after the filing of a settlement agreement.” Oracle Corp.
`
`v. Cmty. United IP, LLC, CBM2013-00015, Paper 13 (July 25, 2013) (citing Office
`
`Patent Trial Practice Guide, 77 Fed. Reg. 48756, 48756-66 (Aug. 14, 2012)).
`
`Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 317(b) and 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(b), a true copy of the
`
`parties’ written
`
`settlement agreement
`
`is being
`
`filed as an exhibit
`
`contemporaneously with this joint motion to terminate. (Ex. 1007, Settlement
`
`Agreement). The settlement agreement has been filed for access by the “Parties
`
`and Board Only.” The parties desire that the settlement agreement be maintained
`
`as business confidential information under 35 U.S.C. § 317(b) and 37 C.F.R. §
`
`42.74(c), and have filed a separate request to that effect. As part of the settlement
`
`agreement, the parties have agreed to move for dismissal of the related district
`
`1
`
`

`
`IPR2015-00934
`U.S. Patent No. 6,886,956
`
`court litigation Innovative Display Technologies LLC v. BMW of North America,
`
`Joint Motion to Terminate Proceeding
`
`
`
`LLC et al., No. 2:14-cv-00106 (E.D. Tex.), and to jointly request termination of the
`
`pending inter partes review 2015-00933 filed by Petitioners against Patent
`
`Owner’s U.S. Patent No. 6,508,563. The district court litigation was dismissed on
`
`July 6, 2015. (Ex. 1008, Order to Dismiss with Prejudice).
`
`The filing of this joint motion was authorized by the Board in an e-mail
`
`communication on July 8, 2015.
`
`For the foregoing reasons, Petitioners and Patent Owner jointly and
`
`respectfully request that the Board terminate this proceeding in its entirety.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Date: July 9, 2015
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
`
`
`/Jeffrey D. Sanok/
`Jeffrey D. Sanok
`Reg. No. 32169
`Jonathan M. Lindsay
`Reg. No. 45810
`Crowell & Moring LLP
`1001 Pennsylvania Avenue NW
`Washington, DC 20004-2595
`Tel.: (202) 624-2500
`Fax.: (202) 628-5116
`jsanok@crowell.com
`jlindsay@crowell.com
`
`Counsel for Petitioners
`BMW of North America, LLC and
`BMW Manufacturing Co., LLC
`
`
`

`
`IPR2015-00934
`U.S. Patent No. 6,886,956
`
`
`Date: July 9, 2015
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Joint Motion to Terminate Proceeding
`
`
`
`
`
`/George W. Webb/
`George W. Webb III
`Reg. No. 60737
`Amir Alavi
`Pending Pro Hac Vice Motion
`Brian Simmons
`Pending Pro Hac Vice Motion
`Ahmad, Zavitsanos, Anaipakos, Alavi
`& Mensing P.C.
`1221 McKinney, Suite 3460
`Houston, TX 77010
`Tel.: (713) 655-1101
`Fax.: (713) 655-0062
`gwebb@azalaw.com
`aalavi@azalaw.com
`bsimmons@azalaw.com
`
`Counsel for Patent Owner
`Innovative Display Technologies LLC
`
`3
`
`

`
`IPR2015-00934
`U.S. Patent No. 6,886,956
`
`
`
`
`Joint Motion to Terminate Proceeding
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`The undersigned certifies that, on this 9th day of July 2015, true and correct
`
`copies of the foregoing JOINT MOTION TO TERMINATE PROCEEDING,
`
`together with Exhibits 1007 and 1008, were served by Petitioners via Federal
`
`Express™ on the attorney of record for the patent owner, with a courtesy copy
`
`being sent by electronic e-mail to the attorneys of record in the co-pending
`
`litigation, at the following addresses:
`
`Attorney of Record
`for Patent Owner:
`
`
`Attorneys of Record
`in Co-Pending
`Litigation:
`
`
`
`George W. Webb III
`Reg. No. 60,797
`E-mail: gwebb@azalaw.com
`Ahmad, Zavitsanos, Anaipakos, Alavi & Mensing PC
`1221 McKinney, Suite 3460
`Houston, TX 77010
`Tel: (713) 655-1101
`Facsimile: (713) 655-0062
`
`Demetrios Anaipakos
`Ahmad, Zavitsanos, Anaipakos, Alavi & Mensing PC
`3460 One Houston Center
`1221 McKinney Street
`Houston, Texas 77010-2009
`
`
`
`/Jonathan Lindsay /
`Jonathan M. Lindsay
`Reg. No. 45,810
`CROWELL & MORING LLP
`1001 Pennsylvania Avenue NW
`Washington, DC 20004-2595
`Tel.: (949) 263-8400
`Fax.: (949) 263-8414
`JLindsay@crowell.com
`
`4

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket