`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`
`CASE NO. 2:14-cv-00201-JRG-RSP
`(LEAD CASE)
`
`CASE NO. 2:14-cv-00106-JRG-RSP
`(Member Case)
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`§§§§§§§§
`
`§§§§§§§§§§
`
`INNOVATIVE DISPLAY
`TECHNOLOGIES LLC
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`HYUNDAI MOTOR COMPANY et al.
`Defendants.
`
`INNOVATIVE DISPLAY
`TECHNOLOGIES LLC
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`BMW OF NORTH AMERICA, LLC, and
`BMW MANUFACTURING CO., LLC,
`Defendants.
`
`ORDER TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE
`
`Plaintiff Innovative Display Technologies LLC (“IDT”) and Defendants BMW of North
`
`America, LLC and BMW Manufacturing Co., LLC (collectively, “BMW”) have filed a joint
`
`motion to dismiss. The Court is of the opinion that the motion should be GRANTED. For
`
`Member Case 2:14-cv-106-JRG-RSP, It is hereby ORDERED as follows:
`
`1. The claims for patent infringement brought by IDT against BMW are dismissed
`
`WITH PREJUDICE.
`
`2. The counterclaims and defenses brought by BMW against IDT are dismissed WITH
`
`PREJUDICE.
`
`Each party is to bear its own costs, expenses, and attorneys’ fees incurred in this action only,
`
`with respect to all claims solely between them.
`
`So ORDERED and SIGNED this 6th day of July, 2015.
`
`ÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁ
`RODNEY GILSTRAP
`ËÒ×ÌÛÜ ÍÌßÌÛÍ Ü×ÍÌÎ×ÝÌ ÖËÜÙÛ
`
`BMW Exhibit 1008
`BMW v. IDT, IPR2015-00934