throbber
1 OF3
`
`SENJU EXHIBIT 2234
`INNOPHARMA v SENJU
`IPR2015-00903
`
`

`
`ECON OMICS
`
`Seventeenth Edition
`
`PAUL A. SAM UELSON
`Institute Professor Eme ritus
`Massachuse tts Institute of Te chnology
`WILLIAM D. NORDHAUS
`A. Whitney Griswold Professor of Economics
`Yale University
`
`rg McGraw-Hill
`H
`Irwin
`
`Boston Burr Ridge, IL Dubuque, lA Madison, WI New York San Francisco St. Louis
`Bangkok Bogota Caracas Kuala Lumpur Lisbon London Madrid Mexico City
`Milan Montreal New Delhi Santiago Seoul Singapore Sydney Taipei Toronto
`
`Page 2 of3
`
`

`
`TH E DEMAND Cl 'RVE
`
`49
`
`cuswmers through che substitution effect. In addition,
`a price reduction will induce extra pLLrchases of goods
`by existing consumers through both the income and
`che substitution effects. Conversely, a rise in the price
`of a good will cause some of us to buy less.
`
`The e xplosive growth
`in com pute r demand
`We can illustrate the law of downward-slop(cid:173)
`Ing demand lor the case of personal com-
`puters (PCs). The prices of the first PCs were
`high. and their ~omputing power was relatively
`modest. They were found in few businesses and even
`fewer homes. It is hard co believe that just 20 years ago
`student.s wrote most o f their papers in longhand and did
`most calculations by hand or wit h s1mple calculatOr'S.
`But the prices of computing power fell sharply over
`che lase cwo decades. As the prices fell. new buyers were
`enticed to buy th eir first computers. PCs came ro be widely
`used for work, for school, and for fun. In the lace 1990s.
`as the value of computers increased with th e development
`of the Internee. yet more people jumped o n the computer
`b~rldwagon. Worldwide. PC sal~s totaled about 100 mrl(cid:173)
`lion in 1999.
`Figure 3-3 shows the prices and quantities of com(cid:173)
`puters and peripheral equipment in the United Scates as
`cakuloted by government statiSticians. The prices reilect
`the cost of purchasing computers with constant quality(cid:173)
`that Is, they cake into account the rapid quality change of
`the average computer purchased. You can see how falling
`prices along w1th improved software. increased utility of
`the lncernet and e-mail. and o cher factors have led to an
`explosive growth in computer oucpuc.
`
`Forces behind the Demand Curve
`·what determines the marke t demand curve for corn(cid:173)
`flakes or gasoline o r computer~?.-\ whole array of fac·
`tors influences how much will be demanded at a
`given price: average levels of income, •he size of the
`population, the p rices and availability of related
`goods, ind ividual and sociaJ tastes, and sp<!cial in(cid:173)
`fluences.
`
`• The averagr mcorr!l of consumers is a key de termi(cid:173)
`nant of demand. As people 's incomes nse, incti-
`
`Page 3 of3
`
`viduals tend to buy more of almost everything, even
`if prices don't change. Amomobile purchases tend
`to rise sharply with higher levels of income.
`• T he fize of the market-measured. say, by the po p(cid:173)
`ulation- clearly affects
`the market demand
`curve. California's 32 million people tend to buy
`32 times more apples and cars than do Rhode Is(cid:173)
`land's I million people.
`• The prices a nd availability of related goods influ(cid:173)
`e nce the demand for a commodity. A pa rticu(cid:173)
`larly important connection exists among s ub(cid:173)
`stitute goods-ones that te nd to perfo rm the
`same fu ncuon, such as cornfla kes a nd oatmeal,
`pens a nd pe ncils, sma ll cars and large cars, o r
`oil and na tural gas. De ma nd fo r good A tends
`to be low if the price o f substitu te p roduc t B is
`low. (For exa mple , if the p rice ·of comp uters
`fal ls, wi ll that increase or decrease the demand
`fo r rypewriters?)
`• [n add itio n to these objec tive eleme n ts. the re
`is a set of subjective eleme n ts called tastes or
`preferem;es. Tastes represenc a variety of culrural
`and historical influences. They may reflect gen(cid:173)
`uine psychological or physiological needs (for
`liquids, love, or excnemenc). And they may in(cid:173)
`clude artificially contrived cravings (for ciga(cid:173)
`rettes, drugs. or fancy sports cars). They may
`also con tain a large element of tradition o r re(cid:173)
`ligion 1 <!ating beef is popular tn America but
`taboo in India, while curried jellyfish is a deli(cid:173)
`cacy in Japan but would make many .\mericans
`gag).
`• Finally, sped.ai influences will affect the demand for
`pa rticular goods. The demand for umbrellas is
`hig h in rainy Seattle but low in sunny Phoe nix;
`the demand for air conditio ners will rise in hot
`weather; the demand fo r automobiles will be low
`in New York, where p ublic u anspo rtation is plen(cid:173)
`tiful and pa rking is a nightmare. ln addition, ex(cid:173)
`pectations about future economic conditions,
`pan.icular!v p rices, may have an important im(cid:173)
`pact o n demand.
`
`The dete rminants of demand are .mmmarized in
`Table 3-2. which uses automobiles as an example.
`
`Shifts in Demand
`As economic life evolves, demand changes inces(cid:173)
`santly. Demand curve3 3it 3till only in textbooks.

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket