throbber
125/C0130
`
`Randomized, Placeb1:>-Controlled, Integrated Phase III Clinical Trials of a Once Daily, Low(cid:173)
`Concentration, MC>dified Bromfenac Ophthalmic Solution Following Cataract Surgery:
`Foc:us on Zero to Trace Anterior Chamber Inflammation
`
`J.AI. Gow1, J.D. Boyce2, H.J. Reiser3, R. Berry4, J.T. Dao5, and S.P. Chandler1
`for the Low Concentration Bromfenac Ophthalmic Solution Once Daily Study Group
`1Bausch & Lomb Inc., Irvine, CA, 20range County Ophthalmology Medical Group, Garden Grove, CA, 3 Eye Care Specialists, Kingston, PA, 4Eye Care Arkansas PA Little Rock, AR, 5Cornea Consultants of Arizona, Phoenix, AZ
`
`Phase 3, placebo-controlled, randomized, double-masked, multi(cid:173)
`center study
`
`440 subjects randomized (222 111 the bromfenac group, 218 111 the
`placebo group)at 39 clinical sites
`
`Eligible subjects were scheduled for a unilateral cataract surgery
`(phacoemulsification or extracapsular) with PCIOL implantation
`
`Screening Phase:: Days ~s to -1
`• Subjects were :11ssigned to receive either bromfena~:
`Pphthalmic sol1.1tipn or plo;u:;ebq. ®sed QD
`• Subjects must !have met inclusion and exclusion criteria to be
`~~~d--
`
`• Primary efficacy endpoint was clearance pf ocular
`inflammation [:Summed Ocular lnflammation Score (SOlS) ""
`01 by day 15
`• Secondary effic:acy endpoint was proportion of subjects with
`trace inflammation (SOlS= o-O.S)
`
`· ..
`
`;:
`:;
`:;
`I
`•• ~':,,l':,:
`
`{Treatment Phase: Day -1 to Day 15
`
`~;~~~::~~=:~~~~J :: ::: :::::: :: ::::~:,,:::::~:.~,::of
`
`l•Subjects began dosing on Day -1 (tv 24 hours before surgery)
`
`:;
`safety and efficac:y
`~l
`~~~:~~t~~~~~i~~~:~ to the office on Day 8±1 for evaluation of
`:;
`•Discontinued test agent on day 14 and subjects returned to the
`.;
`office on Day 15:1::1 for evaluation of safety and effica·cy
`•·••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••·••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••·••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••···•
`
`. \
`
`;~
`
`::
`
`Brumfenac is a non-steroidal anti inflammatory drug (NSAID) with an
`extensive history of cliniccd efficacy; it acts by blocking prostaglandin
`synthesis by inhibiting cyclooxygenase 1 and 2 in the arachidonic acid
`pathway 1
`
`The bromine moiety in bromfenac enhances lipophilicity and facilitates
`penetration throughout ocular tissues 2 - 3
`
`initially
`Brunuck® (brumfenac sodium ophthalmic solution) 0.1% was
`approved in Japan in July .2.000 and was subsequently approved for the
`treatment of blepharitis, conjunctivitis, scleritis (including episcleriti';) and
`post-operative inflammation4
`
`XibromTM (bromfenac ophthalmic solution) 0.09%, administered twice
`daily, was approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) on March
`for the
`treatment of patients with post-cataract ocular
`24, 2005
`inflammation, and in January 2006 for the treatment of oculal- pain
`following cataract surgery4
`
`BromdayTM (bromfenac ophthalmic solution) 0.09% administered once
`daily, was approved by the FDA on October 16, 2010 for the treatment of
`postoperative inflammation and reduction of ocular pain in patients who
`have undergone cataract e:xtractionl
`
`Based on extensive post-marketing experience and data from clinical
`trials, bromfenac ophthalmic solution has demonstrated a favorable
`safety profile
`
`intraocular
`facilitates
`of bromfenac
`formulation
`The advanced
`penetration, thereby allowing a lower medication load while maintaining
`clinical efficacy with once daily dosing
`
`in a post-hoc analysis
`reduction of ocular
`the
`o~: To evaluate
`inflammation to 0 or trace anterior chamber inflammation of
`advanced
`formulation,
`low-concentration, bromfenac ophthalmic
`solution dosed once daily compared to placebo following cataract
`surgery in 2 integrated clinical trials.
`
`Presented at the SSth Annual Meeting of The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, Inc.; May 5-9, 2013; Seattle, WA.
`
`Anterior Chamber Cells
`
`Anterior Chamber Flare
`
`Percent Compliance
`
`Grade
`
`Cell Count
`
`Grade
`
`Flare Count
`
`1-5 cells (trace)
`
`6-15
`
`16-25
`
`26-50
`
`>50
`
`Complete absence
`
`Very slight (barely visible)
`
`Moderate (iris and lens clear)
`
`Marked (iris and lens hazy)
`
`Intense (fibrin clot)
`
`o Bromfenac 0.07% (n=222)
`
`_,.Placebo (n=218)
`
`71.2
`
`100
`
`c 90
`0
`
`:0 E 80 I 70
`
`Q)
`
`"' f:: 60
`g'
`~ 50
`~
`1'l 40
`:G
`~ 30
`iii 20
`t'
`& 10
`
`0
`
`8
`Day
`
`15
`
`Mean1
`
`Early Discontinuations
`
`Subjects who discontinued
`test agent early
`
`Due to lack of efficacy
`
`Bromfenac
`(n = 222)
`91.21%
`
`Placebo
`(n = 218)
`75.98%
`
`34 (15.3%)
`
`96 (44.0%)
`
`7 (3.2%)
`
`52 (23.9%)
`
`'%Ccmpl1mce
`
`100xnumberofdosesrece1ved/i6
`
`14(6.6%.)
`
`43 (21.1%)
`
`Eye Pain
`
`Anterior chamber inflammation
`
`Conjunctival hyperemia
`
`Photophobia
`
`Corneal edema
`
`Lacrimation increased
`
`Foreign body sensation
`
`6 (2.8%)
`5 (2.4%)
`
`2 (0.9%)
`1 (0.5%)
`1 (0.5%)
`
`1 (0.5%)
`0
`
`16 (7.8%)
`11 (5.4%)
`
`8 (3.9%)
`8 (3.9%)
`5 (2.5%)
`
`5 (2.5%)
`5 (2.5%)
`4
`
`o- The incidence of CME/ME was 0.5% (1/212) in the bromfenac
`group compared with 2.0% (4/204) in the placebo group.
`
`low-concentration
`formulation,
`Advanced
`bromfenac ophthalmic solution dosed once daily
`effedively
`and
`safely
`reduced
`ocular
`inflammation associated with cataract surgery.
`Once daily bromfenac ophthalmic solution
`0.07% was approved on April Sth, 2013 by the
`U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as
`PROLENSA lM 6
`
`PROL0280756
`
`SENJU EXHIBIT 2224
`INNOPHARMA v SENJU
`IPR2015-00903
`
`PAGE 1 OF 1
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket