throbber
123
`
`24-HC>ur Evaluation of the Ocular 1Pharmacokine1tics of 14C-Labeled Low-Concentration, Modified Bromfenac
`Ophthalmic Solution Following Topical Instillation into the Eyes of New Zealand White Rabbits
`
`~,:;~~~~~A:~:-:-;e: To evaluate the 24-hour ocular distribution
`and concentrations of 14C-Iabeled
`low-concentration,
`modified bromfenac ophthalmic solution following topical
`instillation 1n New Zealand White rabbit eyes.
`
`~.:~~::U·:o::j~;;: Eighteen New Zealand white rabbits were
`randomly assigned to 6 treatment groups (3 animals per
`treatment group). A single dose of 50~L of the dosing
`solution was topically administered mto the conjunctival
`sac of both eyes of each animal. Animals were
`euthanized and the aqueous humor was collected at 1
`hour ± 5 m1nutes, 2 hours ± 15 m1nutes, 4 hour~. ± 15
`minutes, 8 hours ± 15 minutes, 12 hours ± 15 minutes,
`or 24 hours ± 15 m1nutes
`following dosing. The
`iris/ciliary body, lens, vitreous, retina, choroid, sclera,
`conJunctiva, and cornea
`(target
`tissues) wem also
`collected from each eye for analysis. Dosing solutions
`were analyzed
`to
`confirm
`radiochemical
`punty;
`radioactive concentration of the dosing solutions was
`calculated us1ng liquid scintillation count1ng (LSC).
`
`14C-Iabeled
`of
`residues
`Radioactive
`R~::~;;:}~t:"?~
`bromfenac, expressed as mean parts per million [(ppm)
`~g/g] was seen 1n all target t1ssues of the eyes, with the
`highest concentrations found in the cornea, conjunctiva,
`and sclera. The conCE:mtrat1ons 1n the t1ssues diminished
`to varying degrees over the 24 hour study period, with
`the exception of the lens, which increased insignificantly
`from the 1 hour tim<= point. The levels detected in the
`lens and VItreous humor were
`low and close
`to
`background levels.
`
`C::;..n::;~:~~:-:-;:::_;n: Significant penetration and measurable
`amounts of 14C-Iabe1Ed bromfenac were detected in most
`ocular target t1ssues over 24 hours, with highest levels
`the cornea, conJunctiva, and sclera. The 14C-Iow
`1n
`concentration bromfenac residues in ocular tissues were
`similar to those previously reported with 0.09% 14((cid:173)
`bromfenac,
`the currently available concentration of
`bromfenac formulation.
`
`Bromfenac is a non-steroidal anti inflammatory drug
`(NSAID) with an extens1ve history of clinical efficacy; 1t
`acts by blocking prostaglandin synthesis by inhibiting
`cyclooxygenase 1 and 2 1n
`the arachidonic acid
`pathway.
`
`Baklayan G.A.
`Bausch & Lomb Inc.
`
`Bromfenac, like most of the NSA!Ds, are weakly acidic
`drugs, which ioniz" at the pH of the lachrymal fluid and
`therefore have limited permeability through the an1on1c
`cornea, which has an isoelectric point (pi) of 3.2.
`Reducing
`the pH of the
`formulation 111creases
`the
`unionized
`fraction of
`the drug which enhances
`permeation. 4
`
`(bromfemac ophthalmic solution) 0.09%,
`Xibrom '"
`administered twim daily, was approved by the Food and
`Drug Administration (FDA) on March 24, 2005 for the
`treatment of patients with post-cataract ocular
`inflammation, and 1n January 2006 for the treatment of
`ocular pain following cataract surgery. 5
`
`(brornfenac ophthalmic solution) 0.09%
`Bromday'"
`administered once daily, was approved by the FDA on
`October 16, 2010 for the treatment of postoperative
`inflammation and reduction of ocular pa1n 1n pat1ents
`who have undergone cataract extraction. 6
`
`An advanced formulation of bromfenac (PROLENSA™
`[bromfenac ophthalmic solution] 0.07%) has been
`developed which contains a lower pH (7.8) compared to
`earlier formulations. The lower pH facilitates corneal
`penetration. PROLI::NSA also has a lower concentration
`compared
`to
`other
`available
`formulations
`of
`bromfenac 7
`
`14C-Iabeled bromfenac 0.07% was analyzed to verify the
`radioactive purity prior to its use in the study.
`
`Prior to treatment, 18 animals were weighed and randomly
`assigned to 6 treatment groups.
`A physical exam1nat1on was performed on each animal
`including a pre-treatment ophthalmic examination (slit lamp
`and
`indirect ophthalmoscopy). Acceptance cntena
`for
`placement on study were as follows:
`< Scores of ,; 1 for conjunctival swelling
`~ Scores of 0 for all other observation variables
`Each rabbit received topical ocular doses of a 50~L test agent
`dose into the conjunctival sac using a calibrated pipette and
`the eyelid was held closed for 5-10 seconds following the
`dose.
`
`3 rabbits (both eyes) were assessed per time point over a 24
`hour period
`
`Animals were euthanized at the following 6 t1me po111ts: 1 hr
`± 5 min, 2 hrs ± 15 min, 4 hrs ± 15 min, 8 hrs ± 15 min, 12
`hrs ± 15 m111, or 24 hrs ± 15 m1n following dosing.
`
`The iris/ciliary body, lens, VItreous, ret1na, choroid, sclera,
`conjunctiva, and cornea were collected from each eye and
`weighed.
`
`The ocular pharmacokinetics of 14C-Iabeled bromfenac
`0.07%, pH=7.8 was assessed at 6 time points over a 24
`hour t1me interval.
`
`.·.·::.·--Aqueous Hurnor
`
`W»">Iris/Ci:i~ry Body
`
`·.·:·:·.·.Ler.s
`
`,...Ret!na
`
`.·.·.·.··Sclera
`
`The mean ~g/g of drug-derived radioactivity following
`administration of 14C-bromfenac was seen in all tissues of
`the eyes at low levels, with the highest concentrations
`found in the cornea, conjunctiva, and sclera (Figure 1).
`
`The concentrations in the tissues diminished to varying
`degrees over the 24 hour study period. Levels 1n the lens
`were very low and remained essentially unchanged. The
`radioactivity detected by LSC 1n both the l"ns and the
`vitreous humor was very low and close to background
`values.
`
`The bromfenac 0.07% formulation has been shown to
`Improve the
`penetration 111to ocular t1ssues
`thereby
`allowing for a lower concentration with comparable tissue
`concentrations to those seen with BROMDAY.
`
`the advanced
`and BROMDAY,
`to XIBROM
`Similar
`formulation of bromfenac 0.07% provides
`therapeutic
`concentrations throughout ocular t1ssues for 24 hours
`which allows for once daily dosing.
`
`PROLENSA (bromfenac ophthalmic solution) 0.07% was
`FDA approved on April 5th, 2013 for once daily dosing for
`the treatment of postoperative inflammation and reduction
`of ocular pa111 1n pat1ents who have undergone cataract
`surgery.
`
`Significant penetration and measurable amounts of
`14C-Iabeled bromfenac were detected in most ocular
`target tissues over 24 hours, with highest levels in the
`cornea, conjunctiva, and sclera. The 0.07Dfo
`14C(cid:173)
`bromfenac residues in ocular tissues were similar to
`those previously reported with 0.09% 14C-bromfenac.
`
`1. Baklayan GA, Patterson HM, Song CK, Gow JA, McNamara TR. J Ocular
`Pharmacal Ther 2008;24(4):392-398.
`2. Donnenfeld, E.D., Holland, E.J., Stewart, R.H., et.al. Ophthalmology.
`2007; 114:1653-1662.
`~~~: S.J., Flach, A.J., Jampol, L.M. Surv Ophthalmol. 2010; 55(2):108-
`
`3.
`
`4. Ahuja M, Dhake AS, Sharma SK, Majumdar DK. AAPS J 2008;10:229-41.
`XIBROMTM Prescribing Information. ISTA Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 2010
`5.
`BROMDAYTM Prescribing Information. Bausch and Lomb, Inc. 2011.
`6.
`PROLENSATM Prescribing Information, Bausch and Lomb, Inc. 2013
`7.
`
`The chemical structure of bromfenac conta1ns a
`bromine atom at the C4 pos1t1on, which
`Imparts
`distinguishing characteristics
`from other ophthalmic
`NSA!Ds
`including
`improved potency and enhanced
`lipophilicity
`of
`the molecule, which
`facilitates
`~~1?~!:2~~~~!!5?.~~~~~5?.~5?.~~~1 ~~~-~ ~ ~~ ~:.~: .. 1. -.:. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •••• -~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~--------- --------------------------------------------- -~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~- •••••
`Animal use for this study was approved by the facility's Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) and conformed to the ARVO "'Statement on the Use ~~-~~;~~~·;·i·~-~~-~~~~~-~i·~-~~d-vi·;~~~-R~-;~~~~;;_:··~~~~~~~~~~~~~--------------------------------------------------------------------------~~~~---················-···················
`Presented at the 2013 Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology (ARVO) Annuall Meeting; May 5-9, 2013; Seattle,. WA
`
`0.0001 L . ._ - - - - : - · - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
`
`Hours
`
`Conjunctfva
`
`Financial support: Bausch & Lomb Inc., Irvine, CA, USA
`Financial disclosures: GA Baklayan is an employee of Bausch & Lomb, Inc
`
`PROL0280755
`
`SENJU EXHIBIT 2223
`INNOPHARMA v SENJU
`IPR2015-00903
`
`PAGE 1 OF 1

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket