throbber
PROL0280722
`
`Founder and Director, Jacksoneye
`
`Mit(:hell A. Jackson, MD
`Cataract Surgery: What Really Matters
`Selecting an NSAI D for
`
`Page 1 of 27
`
`SENJU EXHIBIT 2221
`INNOPHARMA v. SENJU
`IPR2015-00903
`
`

`
`N
`
`C")
`
`N r--
`0
`CX)
`N
`0
`_..J
`0
`0::::
`a_
`
`en
`())
`5....
`
`:::J en
`0
`t'\
`~ en ·-
`0
`
`Page 2 of 27
`
`

`
`PROL0280724
`
`3
`
`3. Meekins LC, Afshari NA. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2012,23:1-2
`2. www.aces-abes.org/guidelines_for_cataract_practice.htm#chapter7
`1. Allen D. Clin Evidence. 2008; 8(708):1-14.
`
`Medications
`
`Devices, instruments,
`
`Quality of life2
`
`Vision2
`
`and lenses
`
`-:>-: y A''(·-!' <•
`1: ~.;: ,.. r ~ '<·
`
`, , , , ",,.
`
`:•:
`
`"-
`
`amr•o~·-
`
`FEL0.2D
`
`E
`
`o Gloal of cataract surgery is, "-ro restore vision and to improve
`
`quality of life, with minimal adverse effects of treatment"1
`
`Cataract Surgery: The Pursuit of Perfection
`
`H
`10
`9
`e
`7
`EDl'CZ:P 6
`PECFD 5
`LP:E:D 4
`T 0 Z s
`F :P z
`
`Page 3 of 27
`
`

`
`PROL0280725
`
`4
`
`Find I 0. Eur Ophthalmic Rev. 201 0;4:54-59.
`
`tophcal ophthalmic NSAIDs
`o Redluce the risks typical of
`
`inflatmmation and pain
`for sustained control of
`
`o Possess high COX inhibition
`
`therapeutic levels
`rapi~d and sustained
`
`o Penetrate efficiently to allow
`
`An effective topical ophthaln1ic NSAID s,-----h_o_ul_d_: _____ _
`
`NSi\IDS Are an lmportc:Int Tool for Cataract Surgery
`
`Page 4 of 27
`
`

`
`PROL0280726
`
`5
`
`3. ILEVRO [package insert]. Fort Worth, TX; Alcon; 2013.
`2. ACUVAIL [package insert]. Irvine, CA: Allergan; 2011.
`1. PROLENSA[package insert]. Tampa, FL: Bausch & Lomb Incorporated; 2013.
`
`• Guar gum3
`• Carboxymethylcellulose sodium2·3
`Visco!;ity agents
`• Requires enzymatic conversion to active form
`•
`Prodrug3
`• Affects lipophilicity
`Formulation pH1,2
`• lncre~ases lipophilicity
`Halog~enation 1
`
`Improved penetration
`
`Penetration
`
`~ialogenation 1
`Potency
`
`Delivery of NSAIDs
`Various Approaches lJsed to Improve Drug
`
`Page 5 of 27
`
`

`
`PROL0280727
`
`6
`
`-Continue to evolve
`-Require efficient corneal pe~netration to reach site of C()X production
`Inhibit COX-1 and COX-2 and block the production of prostaglandins
`
`-
`
`o NSAIDs are an important tool for cataract surge~(
`
`-Play a key role in postsurgical inflammation and pain
`
`o Prc>staglandins
`
`trauma
`
`-Produce prostaglandins from arachidonic acid as a result of surgical
`-Primarily expressed in Iris and Ciliary body
`
`o Cy(:looxygenase (COX-1 c:tnd COX-2) Enzymes
`
`response that may adver~;ely affect the outcome
`
`o Cataract surgery is comm~on but can lead to infla1mmatory
`Wh«at really matters ...
`
`Page 6 of 27
`
`

`
`1'-
`
`CX)
`
`N r--
`0
`CX)
`N
`0
`_..J
`0
`0::::
`a_
`
`c
`0 ·-+-' co
`:::J E §
`s..... ·-
`0~
`'+- -=
`0
`I
`~en
`(.)
`(.)
`c ·(cid:173)
`co E >-
`"''ro
`co£
`c..c
`rn§-
`e>u
`-~ co
`(.) c
`:::J Q)
`-gE
`s..... 0
`+-'s.....
`.!:.o
`
`~
`I-
`<(
`en
`z
`w
`_J
`0
`(t::
`a...
`
`Page 7 of 27
`
`

`
`PROL0280729
`
`8
`
`4. PROLENSA [package insert]. Tampa, FL: Bausch & Lomb Incorporated; 2013.
`3. BROMDA Y [package insert]. Tampa, FL: Bausch & Lomb Incorporated; 2011.
`2. XIBROM [package insert] Tampa, FL: Bausch & Lomb Incorporated; 2010.
`1. Bronuck [package insert]. Osaka, Japan: Senju Pharmaceutical Co, Ltd.; 2000.
`*In the United States and Japan. Branded bromfenac.
`
`Launched 2011
`
`B&L/CROMA
`
`Launched 2010
`
`Launched 2009
`
`Takeda
`
`Senju
`
`Launched 2005
`
`Bausch ~& Lomb (ISTA)
`
`Launched 2000
`
`Senju
`
`I
`
`I
`
`I
`
`Europe
`
`Thailand
`
`China
`
`USA
`
`Japan
`
`20 Million Patient Uses Over 10 Years*
`
`Extensive Global Safety Record Since 20004
`
`: >
`
`2013
`
`[
`
`2005 ~
`
`L
`
`~00 : >
`
`formulation bromfenac
`
`ophthalmic solution
`
`Approved in the US:
`
`An advanced(cid:173)
`April20134
`
`Postcataract Surgery
`NSAID in the US for
`
`Approved in the US:
`
`First Once-Daily
`October 20103
`
`Postcataract SurgE~ry
`NSAID in the US for
`
`First Twice-Daily'
`
`Approved in the US:
`
`March 20052
`
`Approved in Japan:
`
`B1ronuck
`
`Dosed Twice Daily
`
`Jully 20001
`
`PROLENSATM
`
`BROMDAY®
`
`XIBRQM®
`
`Inflammation Associated With Cataract Surgery
`Bromfenac: A Long History of Treating Ocular
`
`Page 8 of 27
`
`

`
`PROL0280730
`
`9
`
`PROLENSA [package insert]!. Tampa, FL: Bausch & Lomb Incorporated; 2013
`
`-· None
`
`o Contraindications
`
`surgery
`and through the first 14 days post
`surgery, continued on the day of surgery
`once daily beginning 1 day prior to
`
`-· Instill one drop into the affect~ed eye(s)
`
`o Dosage and Administration
`
`who have undergone cataract surgery
`and reduction of ocular pain in patients
`treatment of postoperative inflammation
`solution) 0.07°/o is indicated for the
`
`-· PROLENSA (bromfenac ophthalmic
`
`o lndlications and Usage
`
`PR<)LENSA™ (bromfenc:tc ophthalmic solution) 0.07°/o
`
`Page 9 of 27
`
`

`
`PROL0280731
`
`10
`
`PROLENSA [package insert]!. Tampa, FL: Bausch & Lomb Incorporated; 2013
`
`-Some ocular NSAIDs increase bleeding time due to interference with platelet
`
`aggregation in conjunction with ocular surgery
`
`o Increased bleeding of ocular tissues
`
`-Other NSAIDs
`-Phenylacetic acid derivatives
`-Acetylsalicylic acid
`
`o Potential for cross-sensitivity
`
`may increase potential for healin~~ problems
`
`-Concomitant use of topical NSAIDs and steroids
`-All topical NSAIDs and corticosteroids may slow or delay healing
`
`o Slow or delayed healing
`
`in asthmatics
`
`-Overall prevalence of sulfite sensitivity is unknown, likely low, and n1ore common
`
`symptoms and life-threatening or less severe asthmatic episodes
`
`-Sulfite allergic reactions may occur in susceptible people and include anaphylactic
`-PROLENSA contains sodium sulfite
`
`o Sulfite allergic reactions
`
`PROLENSA™ Warnings and Precautions
`
`Page 10 of 27
`
`

`
`PROL0280732
`
`11
`
`PROLENSA [package insert]!. Tampa, FL: Bausch & Lomb Incorporated; 2013
`
`• Blurred vision
`• Photophobia
`• Eye pain
`• Foreign body sensation
`• Anterior chamber inflammation
`
`-Most common adverse reactions (3o/o-8o/o of patients)
`
`o Post cataract surgery clinical trial experience
`
`-PROLENSA should not be administered while wearing
`
`contact lenses
`
`o Contact lens wear
`
`-These events may be sight threatening
`
`• Corneal thinning, erosion, ulceration, or perforation
`• Epithelial breakdown
`
`In some susceptible patients, use of topical NSAIDs may result in
`
`-
`
`-Use of topical NSAIDs may result in keratitis
`
`o Kel"atitis and corneal reactions
`
`PROLENSATM Warnings and Precautions
`
`Page 11 of 27
`
`

`
`N
`....-
`
`C")
`C'0
`r--
`0
`CX)
`N
`0
`_..J
`0
`0::::
`a_
`
`c
`
`0 ·-+-' ro -:::J
`E s.....
`0
`LL
`(]) -.J.....
`I-
`
`Page 12 of 27
`
`

`
`PROL0280734
`
`0~
`
`~~
`~-
`lv~h
`
`S coRNEAL p~
`
`~~
`
`~
`
`v~
`
`~~
`
`penetr·ation
`potency and corneal
`bromine increases
`Halog•~nation with
`
`PROLEN~SA rM Effect
`
`PR<)LENSA-Powere~d for Penetration
`
`Page 13 of 27
`
`

`
`PROL0280735
`
`14
`
`Data on file. Bausch & Lomb Incorporated.
`BROMDA Y [package insert]. Tampa, FL: Bausch & Lomb Incorporated; 2011 ..
`Baklayan GA, et al. J Ocu/ Pharmacal Ther. 2008;24(4):392-398.
`
`Clinical significance of in vitro data is unknown.~
`
`.... ············c~~"~~···· .......................... ~ ·· .. .
`
`0
`
`OH
`
`(
`
`~
`NH2
`
`0 ~
`
`o Not a prod rug
`
`o Fa~cilitates penetration
`
`thr~ough the cornea
`
`o lnc:reases the lipophilicity
`
`o lnc:reases the potency
`
`ag4ainst COX-2
`
`Proven Potency and PE~netration
`
`with bromine
`The lbenefits of halogenatio11
`Bro1mfenac: The Halo~~enation Effect
`
`Page 14 of 27
`
`

`
`PROL0280736
`
`penetration
`which facilitates corneal
`increases lipophilicity
`Lowering 1the pH
`
`0~
`
`~~
`~-
`lv~h
`
`S coRNEAL p~
`
`~~
`
`~
`
`v~
`
`~~
`
`PROLEN~SA rM Effect
`
`PR<)LENSA-Powere~d for Penetration
`
`Page 15 of 27
`
`

`
`PROL0280737
`
`26
`
`st.dution) 0,.07%
`{bro1:r-,1f~n:5c op.lith~tmk;
`PRJ::JLEf'4Sttf
`
`~
`ate D. et aL Expert Opin Drug De/h( 2006;3(2 ):275-287
`
`\~
`
`-
`
`1.,5 7~4
`Tear fluid
`
`7.8
`
`8.3
`
`PR,OLENSA™
`
`BROMDAY'ID
`
`The Effect of pH on Penetration
`
`Page 16 of 27
`
`

`
`PROL0280738
`
`0~
`
`~~
`~-
`lv~h
`
`S coRNEAL p~
`
`~~
`
`~
`
`v~
`
`~~
`
`penetration
`which facilitates corneal
`increases lipophilicity
`Lowering 1the pH
`
`penetr·ation
`potency and corneal
`bromine increases
`Halog•~nation with
`
`PROLEN~SA rM Effect
`
`PR<)LENSA-Powere~d for Penetration
`
`Page 17 of 27
`
`

`
`PROL0280739
`
`18
`
`-· Solution: dose uniformity vvithout the need to shake
`
`-· Convenient once-daily dosing
`
`-· More physiologic pH
`
`-· Lower pH improves corneal penetration, thus lower concentration
`
`o Formulation:
`
`-· Facilitates penetration through the cornea
`
`-· Increases the lipophilicity
`
`-· Increases the potency against COX-2
`
`o Effect of halogenation with t)romine:
`
`Wh«at really matters ...
`
`Page 18 of 27
`
`

`
`(j)
`
`....-
`
`0
`r--
`-.::1'"
`0
`CX)
`N
`0
`_..J
`0
`0::::
`a_
`
`en -ro ·-!.....
`I--ro
`(.) ·-c ·(cid:173)-u
`
`C')
`
`(]) en
`ro
`..c a...
`
`Page 19 of 27
`
`

`
`PROL02807 41
`
`20
`
`Data on file, Bausch & Lomb Incorporated, 2012.
`*Secondary endpoint = pain free; tPrimary endpoint = SOlS grade 0.
`
`[Ocular, topical, inhaled, or oral corticosteroid use within 15 days]
`
`Typical exclusion criteria
`
`discontinued.
`dose if prematun
`+or 1 week after lc
`
`I ~
`
`Day 14
`Final dose
`
`h_
`
`I
`
`1 Drop per Dayr for 16 Days
`
`Day -1
`Start dosing
`
`VehiclE~
`
`PROLENSATM
`I
`
`I
`
`y t
`
`' /
`
`~I
`
`sad of s
`Scree ·
`
`\;;;!;;
`Day 22
`Visit 6
`
`Day 15 (±1)t
`
`Visit 5
`
`(±1)
`DayS
`Visit 4
`
`(±1)
`IDay 3
`Visit 3
`
`Day 1 *
`Visit 2
`
`Study 1 = lEast; Study 2 =West
`
`(Surgery)
`
`Visit 1
`
`DayO
`
`Two Double-Masked, Multicenter, Vehicle-Controlled, Randon1ized Studies
`
`Bro1mfenac 0.07°/o QD Phase 3 Clinicalllrials
`
`§.!~~Y Q~~Ja~
`
`Page 20 of 27
`
`

`
`PROL02807 42
`
`21
`
`Data on file, Bausch & Lomb Incorporated, 2012.
`
`• Visual acuity, slit lamp examination, intraocular pressure~, dilated
`
`-· Ocular comfort on instillation
`
`funduscopic exam
`
`-· Ophthalmologic exam
`-· Ocular and systemic adverse events
`
`o Salfety:
`
`• pain grading of "None" on the Ocular Comfort Grading P~ssessment
`
`-· Day 1 resolution of ocular pain
`
`0 se~condary efficacy endpoint:
`
`• Grade 0 = 0 cells and absence of flare
`Inflammation Score (SOlS) of grade 0)
`
`-· Day 15 clearance of ocular inflammation (Summed Ocular
`
`o Primary efficacy endpoint:
`Study Endpoints
`
`§.!~~Y R!:~Ja~ ,
`
`Page 21 of 27
`
`

`
`PROL02807 43
`
`22
`
`Data on file, Bausch & Lomb Incorporated, 2012.
`toay 15 primary endpoint.
`
`Day 15t
`
`Day 8
`
`Day 3
`
`Day 1
`
`Day ·15t
`
`Day 8
`
`Day 3
`
`Day 1
`
`12.7%
`
`/ 28.2 Yo
`0
`
`//
`
`10
`
`.
`
`"'!" "· • /0
`
`2.70~.···"-6··~~ 5 so/
`
`P<O.O~i
`
`45.5°/o
`P<0.05
`
`Vehicle (n=11 0)
`
`-.-PROLENSA (n=11 0)
`
`O~fo
`
`10°/o
`
`20°/o
`
`30~/o
`
`40°/o
`
`50%
`
`60°/o
`
`P=0.001
`
`45.5~1o
`
`P<0.0001
`
`Vehicle (n=108)
`
`-+-PROLENSA (n=112)
`
`m 40%
`i;: c:
`co
`E 50°/o
`E
`co
`:.;;
`0
`c: 60%
`
`... (.)
`tn 10%
`~
`J: ...
`e co
`
`0 20%
`Q)
`
`'0 30°/o
`0
`(.)
`:::l
`
`en
`:::l QO/o
`:E'
`Q)
`
`I Western Region (S;00124-WR) I
`
`QEastern Region (500124-ER) J
`
`Proportion of Patients with SOlS of Grade 0 ~
`
`[
`
`[ ~~~i~~~y J
`
`Pos~toperative I nflamrr1ation
`PROLENSA TM Is Effective at Eliminating
`
`Page 22 of 27
`
`

`
`PROL02807 44
`
`23
`
`Data on file, Bausch & Lomb Incorporated, 2012.
`toay 15 primary endpoint.
`*P<0.0001.
`
`(n=218)
`Vehicle
`
`(n=222)
`
`PROLENSA
`
`47°/o
`
`80o/o
`*
`
`oo/o
`
`10o/o
`
`20o/o
`
`30°/o
`
`40o/o
`
`50°/o
`
`60°/o
`
`70o/o
`
`80o/o
`
`90°/o
`
`(n=218)
`Vehicle
`j~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~m1
`
`~~1~1~1~1~1~1~1~1~1~1~1~1~1~1~1~1~1~1~1~1~1~1~1~1~1~1~1~1~1
`
`:;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
`
`20o/o
`
`(n=222)
`
`PROLENSA
`
`46°/o
`*
`
`•
`
`-
`
`-
`
`:
`.. ,
`
`at Day 15 (Pool1ed Data)
`Trace Cells (0-5 cells)
`
`-
`
`SOlS of 0 at Day 15t
`
`(Pooled Data)
`
`·············································
`[ Efficacy J
`
`Have~ Resolution of lnflamm1ation at Day 15
`PR01LENSA rM Treated Patients Are Twice as Likely to
`
`~~ ~ 0 -
`
`90°/o
`
`QO/o
`... (.)
`~ 10S1
`; 20o/o
`0
`Q) 30°/o
`a.. co
`Q)
`'0 40o/o
`0
`(.)
`~ 50o/o
`a.. co
`.E 60°/o
`i;:
`co
`E ?Oo/o
`E
`co
`. 0
`:.;; 80°/(
`0
`c:
`
`:::l en
`:E'
`Q)
`
`:·. 0
`
`tn
`
`Page 23 of 27
`
`

`
`(Yroportion of Subjects Pain Free at Each Study Day (Pooled Data) J
`
`[ ~~~i~~~y J
`
`Reliief [Day 1]
`PR<)LENSA TM Provid~es Rapid Pain
`
`?fl.~ 1 00°/o
`
`_ ...
`
`-.
`
`..
`
`PROL02807 45
`
`24
`
`Data on file, Bausch & Lomb Incorporated, 2012.
`toay 1 secondary endpoint.
`*P<0.0001.
`
`Day 15
`
`DayS
`
`Day 3
`
`Day 1 t
`
`30°/o
`
`:e: 40%
`01
`s:::::
`01 50°/o
`......
`C/JI
`:::::ll 60°/o
`.C!
`Q.ll ·-"
`(JI
`..,.,
`t/ll
`a..
`·-· 80%
`C'Cll
`s:::::
`u..
`90o/o
`.....
`Q.ll
`Q.ll
`
`?QOfo
`
`a..
`.....
`01
`Ct.
`01
`
`Placebo (n=218)
`
`-+-PROLENSA (n==222)
`
`53°/o
`
`SOo/o
`
`167°/o
`
`92~0/o
`
`*
`*
`
`92°/o
`
`*
`*
`
`8~7°/o
`
`*
`""~
`
`79°/o
`
`*
`*
`
`A_
`
`Page 24 of 27
`
`

`
`PROL02807 46
`
`25
`
`Data on file, Bausch & Lomb Incorporated, 2012.
`#Comfort graded on the Ocular Comfort Grading Assessment (OCGA)
`
`
`- ~
`
`- - - - -
`
`~
`
`-
`
`~
`
`~
`
`-
`
`~
`
`~
`
`-
`
`-
`
`~
`
`~
`
`-
`
`~
`
`~
`
`-
`
`-
`
`~
`
`-
`
`-
`
`~
`
`~
`
`Day 15
`
`Day 8
`
`Day 3
`
`Day 1
`
`Improvement Co1mpared to Vehicle in Change from Baseline
`
`(Pooled Data)
`
`Haziness
`
`Eye discharge
`
`Pl1otophobia
`
`sensation
`Foreign body
`
`Itching
`
`Tearing
`
`Ocular pain
`
`Symptom#
`Comfort
`
`PR<)LENSA TM: Comfc>rt Better Than Vet1icle
`
`.·.·.·.··:·:·:·:·:·:·:·:·:·:·:·:·:·:·:·:·:·:·:·:·:·:·:·:·:·:·:·:·.·.·:·:·:·:·:·:·:·:·:···
`
`Safety
`
`Page 25 of 27
`
`

`
`PROL0280747
`
`26
`
`o Sollution: dose uniformity without the need to shake
`
`o Convenient once-daily dosing
`
`o More physiologic pH
`
`o Comfortable
`
`-Anterior chamber inflammation, foreign body sensation, eye pain, photophobia, blurred vision
`
`o Lo\N rate of adverse events (3~Vo-8%)
`
`o Eff~ective treatment for postope~rative inflammation and pain in patients
`PR01LENSA rM provides:
`
`who have undergone cataract surgery
`
`Wh«at really matters ...
`
`Page 26 of 27
`
`

`
`PROL02807 48
`
`US/PR:A/13/0130
`©2013 Bausch & Lomb Incorporated.
`
`All other product/brand names are trademarks of their respective owners.
`®/™ are trademarks of Bausch & Lomb Incorporated or its affiliates.
`
`Page 27 of 27

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket