throbber
Physicians' Perceptions
`of Prescription Drug Prices:
`Their Accuracy and Effect
`on the Prescribing Decision ·
`
`E. M. Kolassa
`
`ABSTRACT. A survey of 100 primary care physi~ians found that,
`in general, these practitioners were unable to estimate accurately the
`costs· of the drugs they commonly prescribe. A pattern of overesti(cid:173)
`mating the costs of lower priced agents and underestimating the
`costs of higher priced agents suggests that physicians generalize
`prices for most drugs into a narrow range between $1.00 and $2.00 ·
`per day. Even though these physicians failed to estimate adequately
`the costs of the medications they prescribe, most claimed to consider .
`the cost of medications when making the prescribing decision. These
`findings imply that actual costs have litde or no actua1 effect on the
`prescribing decisions of most physicians. Should this be true, at(cid:173)
`tempts to control health care costs that do ~ot focus on physician
`education in the area of treatment costs may prove ineffective.
`
`INTRODUCTION
`
`Health care costs are ctirrently the focus of considerable attention
`by all facets of society. Physicians, as the primary decision makers
`and resource allocators within the health care system, must bear a
`large share of the responsibility for controlling health care costs
`while providing the best possible care for their pati~;.ts. Balancing
`
`t
`
`l i
`
`E. M. Kolassa~ M.B.A., is Senior Research Associate. Research Institute of
`Pharmaceutical Sc~nces. University of M ississippi. University, MS 38677.
`Journal of Research in Pharmaceutical Economics, Vol. 6(1) 1995
`© 1995 by The Haworth Press, Inc. All rights reserved
`23
`SENJU EXHIBIT 2147 ]
`. INN.OPHARMA v SENJU j
`IPR2015-00903
`
`l I
`
`PAGE 1 OF 5
`
`

`
`-·
`
`. .
`'
`
`30
`
`JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN PHARMACEUJICALECONOMJCS
`
`'
`price. This table does not include those physicians stating they did
`not care about the cost of medications. As can be seen, the pattern
`of overestimating the cost of less costly agents and underestimating
`the cost of those priced higher is also apparent here.
`As with previous studies, physicians, in general, tended to over(cid:173)
`estimate the costs of medications; in this case, 48.2% of the esti·
`mates given were more than 20% higher than the mean actual cost
`(S. 6). These overestimations were not consistent across all agents
`studied, however, since physicians consistently overestimated only
`the costs of those medications that are used for chronic disorders
`that are relatively asymptomatic, such as hypenension and hyper(cid:173)
`cholesterolemia. The price estimates of medications for acute disor(cid:173)
`ders, such as infections and pain, as well as th.;>se for more symp·
`tomatic diseases, such as arthritis, tended to be low. Since this study,
`as well as those previously cited. found patient feedback to be the
`physicians' primary source of drug price information, it might be
`hypothesized that patients are more prone to complain of the cost of
`medications for which they feel little benefit from therapy, while
`medications offering relief from acute symptoms are less likely to
`generate these complaints. Tables 3 and 4 provide the percentage of
`responses that fell below, within, and above the range of prices for
`the specific agen.ts, while Table 5 provides the physicians' reponed
`acquisition of drug price information from various sources and the
`perceived accuracy of the information provided by each source.
`Table 6 contrasts the responses of private practice physicians with
`those who are staff employees of hospitals or HMOs.
`Physicians claim to receive price information from pharmaceuti·
`cal company sales representatives and patients on a fairly regular
`basis and believe patients to be accurate in their assessments of
`prices. Differences between practice types did emerge in this area of
`questioning, as shown in Table 6~ with physicians who are staff
`employees of hcspitals and HMOs being significantly less likely to
`receive price information from sales representatives (p = .04) or
`patientS (p < .01 ) than physicians in private practice. The solo
`practitioners differed from staff physicians in the extent of their
`belief in the a ccurac y of pric e inf ormation pro v ided b y phannacisls,
`with staff employees appearing to trust phannacists' price informa(cid:173)
`tion more than the solo practitioners (p = .0 16). These differences
`
`PAGE 20F 5
`
`...
`
`l 1
`
`

`
`.1@-;.
`
`· · rye;=-e~...-==-···--·"'....,.·r-r.,.. .:
`
`c
`
`_,....;.
`
`*
`
`··
`
`·•t.,.'>c··· .................. lf..l.*."..._ .. .,.,., •..•.. """~'_.~l'
`
`.. .....,. wrt
`
`.... ,....~~··'--•-.... ~ ..... -w.~·~,_-·
`
`· ..
`
`.·
`
`I
`I i
`
`··-··
`
`---------
`
`11.7o/o
`3.1%
`6.5%
`6.9%
`18.5%
`27.0%
`50.00/o
`12.5%
`25.8%
`44.6%
`59.0%
`8.8%
`35.1%
`51.5°.4
`36.9".4
`13.~..4
`
`5.9%
`
`0%
`24.2-.4
`31.0%
`49.2%
`63.5%
`46.2%
`46.4%
`67.7%
`55.4%
`41.0%
`11.8%
`64.9%
`48.5•.4
`83.1%
`86.4%
`
`tbart&o.50
`Cost by more
`Overestimating
`
`Percentage
`
`Wlflln +1-.$0.50
`% of ES11mates
`
`A.t'JIIAI Cost
`of Average
`
`82.4%
`96.9%
`69.3%
`62.1%
`32.3%
`9.5%
`3.8%
`41.1%
`6.5%
`
`Cost by More than
`Underestimating
`
`Peroentaga
`
`0%
`0%
`79.4%
`0%
`0%
`0%
`0%
`So .50
`
`68
`65
`62
`58
`65
`63
`78
`56
`62
`65
`39
`68
`67
`68
`65
`66
`n
`
`AUG.MENTIN 250mg TID
`CEClOR Sus_R 250mglml TID
`VOL TAREN 50mg TID
`' FEl.DENE 2()fng_ 00
`! PROCARDIA Xl60mg QD
`
`MEVACOR 20mg 00
`ZANTAC 150~ QD
`APAP w/ Cod 13 04h
`YICRONASE SnYtJ BID
`VASOTEC 10mg QD
`LOTENSlN 1 Omg CD
`Generic IJuprofan 600mg TfO
`PAEMARIN 0.625mg CD
`LASIX 40mg BID
`LANOXIN 0.25mg QD
`Ci&nwic HCTZ 2.5q QD
`
`Product and DaDy Dose
`
`TABLE 4. Accuracy of Physician EstimatBs of Drug Costs for Physicians Offering Estimates.
`
`~~-~
`
`t!
`
`.....
`....,
`
`U'l
`~
`0
`
`~
`~
`~
`
`1-C >
`
`

`
`-
`
`···-· -··--- - - . ..,,
`
`J2
`
`JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN PHARMACEUTICAL ECONOMICS
`'
`TABLE 5. Soufces and Perceived Accuracy of Drug Price Information.
`
`n""' 100
`
`"HoW often do you get drug pries
`information from:"
`
`"How accurate, or trustwonhy lslhis
`infOI'mation7"
`
`SoUI'C8
`Drug Company
`Sales Person
`Patient
`Pharmacist
`Published Source
`CoUeaguee
`
`Always Often seldom Niver
`
`Very Somewhat Not No
`Oplnion
`
`10.1
`12.1
`47.5 30.3
`10.1
`8.1 ~.5 41.4
`4.0
`1e.2 51.5 28.3
`17.2 55.6 26.3
`1.0
`1.0
`20.2
`21.2
`fi/.6
`
`26.0
`59.6
`58.1
`32.6
`9.6
`
`63.5
`26.5
`ZJ.7
`43.2
`56.4
`
`8.3
`11.7
`2.2
`8.4
`20.2
`
`2.1
`2.1
`16.1
`15.8
`13.8
`
`TABLE 6. Comparison of Drug Pries Information Source for Private Prac·
`tice and Staff Physicians. AvQrage Ratings.
`
`n= 100
`
`"How often do you get drug
`price in1ofmation from:"
`{1 """Always" 4 ... "Never")
`
`''How aoourate, or trustworthy
`is this Information?"
`(1 = "Very" 3 • "Not")
`
`Source
`Drug Company
`Sales Person
`Patient
`Pharmadst
`Published Source
`CoUeagues
`
`Private
`Prac:tloe Staff
`
`pvaJue
`(chi-sqr.
`
`Private
`Practice Staff
`
`pvatue
`{c::tli·sqr.)
`
`2.31
`2.40
`3.12
`3.09
`2.97
`
`.04
`2.64
`3.00 < .01
`2.77
`.09
`3.00
`.40
`2.96
`.70
`
`1.86
`1.49
`'1.39
`1 .72
`2.11
`
`1.67
`1.61
`1.15
`1.68
`2.16
`
`.40
`.45
`.19
`.30
`.09
`
`may be due to the lack of individual patient follow-up and repeat
`visits within a staff employee's practice and the staff employee's
`greater exposure to pharmacists on a re~lar basis.
`Even with these differences in the manner in which the physi(cid:173)
`cians may receive price information and their assessments of the
`accuracy of this information, there were no differences in the accu(cid:173)
`racy of the price estimates offered by physicians in the various
`practice settings.
`As mentioned previously, the error in price estimates appeared to
`follow a pattern, with physicians overestimating tho costs of some
`
`---=-"P~GE 4 OF 5
`
`

`
`, . _____ .... ___________ , \
`
`·': . .
`
`E. M. KoU:Jssa
`
`33
`
`medication types and underestimating others . . Additionally~ there
`was a distinct pattern of overestimation of the costs of less expen(cid:173)
`sive agents~ such as Lanoxin®, Lasix®, and generic products,
`while there was underestimation of the costs of antibiotics and
`NSAIDs (Feldene® and Voltaren®). While the overestimation of
`drug costs has been deemed acceptable by previous researchers,
`since this overestimation may limit the use of these products to only
`those cases where they are truly necessary, the underestimation of
`the costs of some agents may then lead to their overuse or to failure
`to consider similar products with lower costs (6). This pattern of
`overestimation of the costs of some agents and the underestimation
`of others lead to an exarrunation of the distribution of the estimates.
`While only 4 of the 15 agents included in the study were priced
`between $1.00 and $2.00 per day, 59.3% of all price estimates fell
`within that range. Might one, then. generalize that the responding
`physicians assume that the "typical,. drug costs between $1.00 and
`$2.00 per day? This assumption would allow the physician's stated
`concerns about health care costs to be reconciled with his or her
`ignorance of the actual costs.
`
`BEUEFS AND OPINIONS
`
`Included in the survey instrument was a group of statements
`dealing with health care cost issues. Physicians were asked to assess
`their degree of agreement with these statements using a 1 to 7 scale,
`with .. 1'' indicating very strong disagreement and "7" indicating
`very strong agreement. The findings from this section are presented
`in Table 7.
`Physicians registered strong agreement with most questions con(cid:173)
`cerning health care costs and the role of cost in prescribing. There
`was, in fact, general agreement with every statement dealing with
`the use of cost irJ~.:trmation and the concern for the cost impact of
`decisions. At the same time, physicians indicated a weak disagree(cid:173)
`ment with statementS concerning their own knowledge of drug
`prices. partly acknowledging their own lack of knowledge. The only
`difference between practice types in this set of statements was. again~
`between solo practice and staff physicians, who differed in the
`amount of patient complaints they hear concerning price (p < .01 ).
`
`PAGE 5 OF 5

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket