throbber
220
`
`J.C.S. Perkin I1
`
`The Acid-catalysed Hydrolysis of Acetanilide
`By J. W. Barnett and Charmian J. O'Connor,' Department of Chemistry, University of Auckland, New Zealand
`
`The rate of hydrolysis of acetanilide has been measured over a wide range of acidities in HCI, H2S04, and HCIO,.
`In H,S04 3 80% (w/w) acetanilide undergoes sulphonation in preference to hydrolysis. Application of the
`Bunnett criteria of mechanism fit the data in HCI and H2S04well, whereas the data in HCI04 are fitted by an empirical
`two-term rate equation. A revised value of the constant -pKAH+ has been determined in each acid.
`
`THE nitro-derivatives of acetanilide all show a rate
`minimum ls2 in their hydrolysis profiles between 70 and
`80% (w/w) H,SO, and this has been attributed to a
`change in mechanism from A-2 to A-1. These sub-
`stituted anilides are quite weakly basic and consequently
`this change in mechanism occurs only in very concen-
`trated acid. If this were a general phenomenon then
`acetanilide with a reported -~KAH+ value of -0.61
`hould have displayed a unimolecular mechanism in
`
`relationship (1) where Abs, AbsA, and AbsAE+ are the
`absorbances of the solute in its partially protonated,
`[AH+]/[A] = (Abs - Absa)/(Absm+ - Abs)
`(1)
`unprotonated, and fully protonated forms, respectively,
`at hmaxAn+. At the concentration of acetanilide used
`(7.4 x 1 0 - 6 ~ ) these varied from AbsA = 0.665
`to
`AbsAH+ = 0.543. Equation (1) does not take account
`of minor medium effects and impurity errors, and it is not
`
`TABLE 1
`Ionisation ratios for acetanilide (7.4 x 1 0 - 5 ~ ) in hydrochloric, sulphuric, and perchloric acids calculated using
`absorbances measured a t 238 nm
`Sulphuric acid
`CHf
`1-31
`1-62
`2.18
`2-90
`3-49
`3.98
`6-10
`
`Perchloric acid
`CH+
`0.95
`1.50
`2.07
`2.65
`3-28
`4.70
`
`log10 I
`-0.811
`- 0.487
`- 0.233
`- 0.014
`0-218
`0.791
`
`--HA
`0-325
`0-57
`0.91
`1.13
`1.36
`1-89
`
`Hydrochloric acid
`log10 1
`- 0.757
`- 0.506
`-0.165
`- 0.207
`0.201
`0.247
`0.635
`1.065
`
`CH+
`1.41
`2.00
`2.30
`2-87
`4.00
`4.45
`5.50
`7.00
`
`- H A
`0.46
`0.73
`0.84
`1.34
`1.44
`1-55
`1.86
`2.31
`
`--HA
`0.48
`0.63
`0.87
`1.18
`1.38
`1.62
`2.30
`
`log10 I
`- 1.009
`- 0.794
`- 0.354
`0.009
`0.059
`0-139
`1.006
`
`reasonably dilute acid. Although the hydrolysis of
`acetanilide does show a rate minimum in concentrated
`solutions of sulphuric acid, this is caused by preliminary
`sulphonation to N-acetylsulphanilic acid. Measurement
`of the basicity constant of acetanilide shows the literature
`value 3 to be in error.
`
`RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
`Basicity Constant.-We have determined the ionisation
`ratio I = [AH+]/[A] for acetanilide in hydrochloric,
`sulphuric, and perchloric acids (Table 1) by use of the
`1 J. A. Duffy and J. A. Leisten, J . Chem. Soc., 1960, 853.
`a M. I. Vinnik, I. M. Medvetskaya, L. R. Andreeva, and
`A. E. Tiger, Russ. J . Phys. Chem., 1967, 41, 128; M. I. Vinnik
`and I. M. Medvetskaya, ibid., p. 947.
`
`easy to specify a systematic error which could be due to
`such effects when one has very small differences between
`extinction coefficients of the two forms of an indicator.
`However, the spectra appeared very clean, reproducible,
`and reversible, and we believe that the U.V. spectro-
`photometric changes we observed represent the equili-
`brium protonation of acetanilide, and are not an artifact
`of medium effects, as was observed for the spectra of
`benzonitrile in acid soluti~n.~
`
`I. Heilbron, Dictionary of Organic Compounds,' Eyre and
`Spottiswoode, 1937, vol. 1, p. 3, as quoted by J. A. Duffy and
`J. A. Leisten (Ref. 1).
`K. Yates and J, B. Stevens, Canad. J. Chem., 1965, 43, 529.
`6 C. J. Hyland and C . J. O'Connor, J.C.S. Perkin 11, following
`paper.
`
`Downloaded by University of Oxford on 04 July 2012
`
`Published on 01 January 1973 on http://pubs.rsc.org | doi:10.1039/P29730000220
`
`View Online
`
` / Journal Homepage
`
` / Table of Contents for this issue
`
`Page 1 of 3
`
`SENJU EXHIBIT 2075
`INNOPHARMA v. SENJU
`IPR2015-00903
`
`

`
`1973
`Table 2 shows the results of plotting log,, I against
`Only values of log,, I within the range &l were
`-HA.6
`substituted in these plots. The slopes are close to unity,
`and thus the values of - ~ K A H + = - H A at log,, I = 0
`can be regarded as valid functions within the limitations
`of the basic uncertainties discussed above. The limits
`on -PKAH+ given in Table 2 were obtained from least-
`squares plots, but bearing in mind the small difference
`
`TABLE 2
`Values of - p K a ~ + of acetanilide in hydrochloric, sulphuric,
`and perchloric acids a t 25.0 "C
`Slope of log,, I
`- pKm+
`VS. -HA
`0-97 f 0.04
`1.23 & 0.02
`1-04 f 0.07
`1-32 & 0.02
`1-00 f 0-03
`1-12 -J= 0.01
`
`Correln.
`coefft.
`0.993
`0.989
`0.998
`
`Acid
`HC1
`H W *
`HC10,
`
`in absorbance and the limitation of the spectrophoto-
`meter (&0.002 absorbance units), more realistic error
`
`221
`(H, + log,, c,+)
`free-energy
`linear
`(Bunnett-Olsen
`relationship) .9 Both these criteria of mechanism give
`good correlations for the data in HCl and H,SO,. The
`values of w generally lie in the range 1.2-3-3 said to be
`characteristic of water acting as a nucleophile in the
`r.d.s., but the values of 4 are all >,0.58, and therefore
`fall in the region indicative of water acting as a proton-
`transfer agent. It would seem that the limits of
`Bunnett's original classifications will have to be extended
`as more experimental data becomes available.
`The data in HC10, do not correlate well with these
`criteria of mechanism. We have previously found a
`similar lack of correlation for rates of hydrolysis of
`benzamide, N-methylbenzamide, and NN-dimethyl-
`benzamide in HC1, H,SO,,
`and HC10,.7 We have
`found, however, that all these data correlate very well
`with a rate equation7310 which allows the acid hydro-
`lysis of amides to proceed by two distinct mechanistic
`paths involving both oxygen- and nitrogen-protonated
`
`Hydrochloric acid
`26.0 "C
`105k4p
`cH+
`1.42
`0.416
`2.74
`0.880
`4.46
`0.961
`6-05
`0-672
`7.67
`0.270
`9.45
`0.129
`
`TABLE 3
`Hydrolysis of acetanilide in concentrated solutions of mineral acids
`Hydrochloric acid
`Sulphuric acid
`Sulphuric acid
`Perchloric acid
`26.0 "C
`80.0 "C
`80.0 "C
`26.0 "C
`Iosk?kg/s-l
`losh$!l/s-l
`10Skg/s-l
`CHS 105kgp
`CH+
`CH+
`CH+
`1.06
`1-40
`70.3
`1-10
`0.394
`1.48
`82.2
`0.287
`1.18
`1.72
`0.669
`2.13
`97.7
`93.3
`1.62
`0.403
`2-33
`0.746
`2.96
`126
`2.40
`112
`2.23
`0.440
`3.76
`147
`3.02
`0.781
`3.16
`117
`2.88
`0.431
`3.72
`0-735
`4-61
`138
`3-83
`116
`3-58
`0.368
`4.51
`0.694
`6-26
`118
`4.63
`106
`4.34
`0-266
`6-05
`101
`5-32
`0.343
`6-26
`6-16
`0.210
`60.8
`7.70
`79-6
`6-19
`0-203
`7.1 1
`31.6
`10.1
`18.4
`9.16
`9-16
`
`Perchloric acid
`80.0 "C
`Ca+ 105k+p
`26.8
`0.50
`1.06
`48.3
`2-25
`80.7
`3-60
`59.3
`6-20
`36.6
`7-10
`17.2
`
`TABLE 4
`Analysis of rate data for hydrolysis of acetanilide by use of
`Bunnett w and Bunnett-Olsen 1.f.e.r. relationships
`1.f.e.r.
`Bunnett w
`+
`Correln.
`coefft.
`0.990
`0.996
`0.987
`0.989
`0.892
`0.971
`
`log,, K O ,
`-2.17
`0.58
`-4.32
`0.66
`-2.00
`0.67
`-4.14
`0.71
`0.68 -2.33
`0.70
`-4.62
`
`Correln.
`coeff t.
`0.991
`0-997
`0.998
`0.996
`0.963
`0.992
`
`Acid
`HC1
`H,SO,
`
`HCIO,
`
`t/"C
`w
`80.0 2.46
`26.0
`2.88
`80.0 2.67
`26.0
`3.96
`80.0
`2.86
`26.0
`4.37
`
`-PKAH+ would be approximately
`limits of
`-j=O.1.
`However, it does seem that the values of - p K a ~ +
`obtained differ for the three mineral acids, as do the
`basicity constants of benzamide, N-methylbenzamide,
`and NN-dimet h ylbenzamide .'
`Table 3 summarises the results obtained for the
`hydrolysis of acetanilide in acid solutions. The pseudo-
`first-order rate constants of hydrolysis, k4, must be
`corrected for the fraction, a, of protonated substrate
`before an attempt at kinetic analysis is made. Equations
`
`a = [AHf]/([AHt] + [A]) == hA/(KAH+ + hA)
`
`applicable to hydrolysis of moderately basic substrates
`have been used in the application of the data in Table 3
`to the criteria of mechanism which follow. Where the
`data are available, values of H,, and a, appropriate to the
`temperature of the rate measurements have been sub-
`stitGted into the equations of criteria of mechanism.
`This method has been described previ~usly.~
`Table 4 shows the results of plotting (log,, k* - log,, a )
`and against
`against loglo a, (Bunnett w function)
`
`(a) K. Yates, J. B. Stevens, and A. R. Katritzky, Canad. J .
`Chem., 1964, 42, 1967; (b) K. Yates and J. C. Riordan, ibid.,
`1966, 43, 2328; (c) K. Yates, personal communication.
`7 C. A. Bunton, S. J. Farber, A. J. G. Milbank, C. J. O'Connor,
`and T. A. Turnev. T.C.S. Perkin II. 1972. 1869.
`
`transition states. Table 5 shows the fit of this equation
`(2) for the hydrolysis data of acetanilide. We have
`kg = kN(1 - a)cH+aw + hoaa,
`plotted the data in two forms
`k,Jaa, = kNcB+(l - a ) / a + ko
`k*/cH+(l - a)a, = kN + kga/cH+(l - a)
`
`(2)
`
`(3)
`
`(4)
`J. F. Bunnett, J. Amer. Chem. Soc., 1961, 83, 4956, 4968,
`4973, 4978.
`J. F. Bunnett and F. P. Olsen, Canad. J . Chem., 1966, 44,
`1899.
`10 C. A. Bunton, C. J. O'Connor, and T. A. Turney, Chein. and
`Ind.. 1967. 43. 1386.
`
`and
`
`Downloaded by University of Oxford on 04 July 2012
`
`Published on 01 January 1973 on http://pubs.rsc.org | doi:10.1039/P29730000220
`
`View Online
`
`Page 2 of 3
`
`

`
`222
`where equation (3) gives a more reliable value of kN (the
`rate constant for hydrolysis by the N protonated path)
`and equation (4) a more reliable value of ko (the rate
`constant for hydrolysis by the 0 protonated pathway).
`
`J.C.S. Perkin I1
`
`Acid
`HC1
`
`H2S04
`
`TABLE 6
`Analysis of rate data for hydrolysis of acetanilide by use
`of a two-term rate equation
`Equation (3)
`Equation (4)
`10%~/ Correln.
`Correln.
`105ko/s-l coefft.
`1 mol-l s-1
`coefft.
`t/"C
`0.960
`62-3
`0.914
`80-0 47.6
`0.321
`0-341
`0.976
`0.929
`26-0
`62.1
`0.982
`33.3
`0.923
`80.0
`0.403
`0.982
`0-177 0.738
`25.0
`0.998
`46.3
`0.994
`60.1
`80-0
`0.310
`0.999
`0.172
`0.992
`26.0
`
`hydrochloric, sulphuric, and perchloric acids at 25.0 "C
`were measured on a Shimadzu QV.50 spectrophotometer at
`238 nm. The value of AbsA was taken as the value in water
`obtained in solutions > 25% (w/w) hydrochloric acid,
`and the value of AbsAH+ was the constant absorbance value
`2 6 0 % (w/w) sulphuric acid and in solutions of 2 5 5 %
`= 238 nm log,, &A = 3-95
`(w/w) perchloric acid. At
`and log,, &AH+ = 3.86. It should be noted that the
`extinction coefficient of protonated acetanilide is less than
`that for acetanilide. This is opposite from the normal
`behaviour of amides, but similar behaviour has been found
`with ureas.16 However, the measurements relate to a true
`equilibrium situation since 1 ml samples of stock solution
`(7.4 x 1 0 - 4 ~ ) in water and 70% (w/w) HClO, gave identical
`spectra when diluted to 10 ml of 20% (w/w) HClO, with
`acid and water respectively.
`Measurement of Reaction Rates.-Hydrolysis
`reactions at
`80.0 f 0.1 "C were carried out in an oil-bath maintained at
`the required temperature by using a Gallenkamp contact
`Only the data in HC10, give good correlations of these
`thermometer, Klaxon stirrer, and a heating element. The
`plots.
`hydrolysis reactions at 25.0 f 0.1 "C were carried out in a
`We have recently shownll that, generally, rate
`water-bath fitted with a Tecam (Techne, Cambridge)
`constants for acid hydrolysis of amides which do not
`temperature unit.
`Acetanilide (ca. 7 x L O - 4 ~ ) was dissolved in 10 ml of
`fit the well accepted criteria of reaction m e c h a n i ~ m ~ , ~
`the appropriate acid. 1 ml aliquots, sealed in ampoules,
`seem to fit this empirical two-term rate equation. We
`were removed a t time intervals and were diluted 10 times
`do not, however, suggest that equation (2) should be
`before spectrophotometric analysis of the decrease in ab-
`applied to all acid-catalysed amide hydrolysis data.
`sorbance between 235 and 245 nm. Values of A$, calculated
`SuZphonation.-In H,S04 > 70% (wlw) ( 1 1 . 5 ~ ) the
`a t several wavelengths from slopes of plots of log,, (Abs, -
`position of maximum absorbance shifted rapidly from
`Abs,) against t (where Abs, and Abs, are the absorbances of
`238 to 252 nm to form an intermediate identified as
`the aliquots at time t and at infinite time respectively)
`N-acetylsulphanilic acid, which then hydrolysed to
`agreed within
`2%.
`4-aminobenzenesulphonic acid. Details of this sulphon-
`Product A rtaZysis.-On
`hydrolysis, acetanilide produces
`= 7500) and acetic
`= 204 nm (
`the anilinium ion, A,,
`ation reaction l2 and a report on the acid-catalysed
`E
`~
`~
`
`acid, A,,
`= 204 nm (cmx = 60). Under the conditions
`hydrolysis of the intermediate 133 l4 have been published.
`of the hydrolysis reactions, it was not possible to identify
`the products. Therefore solutions of acetanilide ten times
`more concentrated than under the kinetic conditions were
`heated for the time required for complete hydrolysis in
`(wlw) J , perchloric
`solutions of hydrochloric acid [6-35y0
`acid [10-70~0 (w/w)], and sulphuric acid [10-75%
`(wlw)].
`Peaks were then observed at 260.5,254.6, 248-7, and 249 nm
`and these agreed well with the spectrum of pure aniline.
`It was not possible to identify acetic acid under these
`conditions.
`
`HC10,
`
`EXPERIMENTAL
`(B.D.H.) was recrystallised from
`Materials.-Acetanilide
`hot water (m.p. 113.5-114-0 "C).
`Concentrated AnalaR hydrochloric, sulphuric, and per-
`chloric acids were standardised against sodium hydroxide,
`and were diluted with deionised water by weighing to give
`solutions of the required molarity.
`UZtmviobt Sfiectra.-The
`changes in the spectrum of
`acetanilide, 7.4 x 10-6~, in increasing concentrations of
`l1 J. W. Barnett, C. J. Hyland, and C. J. O'Connor, Cham.
`Comm., 1972, 720.
`la J. W. Barnett and C. J. O'Connor, Chew. and Ind., 1970,88,
`1172.
`
`121446 Received, 6th April, 19721
`la J. W. Barnett and C. J. O'Connor, J.C.S. Perkin 11, 1972,
`2378.
`l4 J. W. Barnett and C. J. O'Connor, Tetrahedron Letters, 1971,
`2164.
`l6 J. W. Barnett and C. J. O'Connor, unpublished results.
`
`Downloaded by University of Oxford on 04 July 2012
`
`Published on 01 January 1973 on http://pubs.rsc.org | doi:10.1039/P29730000220
`
`View Online
`
`Page 3 of 3

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket