throbber
(12) United States Patent
`McCoy et al.
`
`US006495120B2
`US 6,495,120 B2
`Dec. 17, 2002
`
`(10) Patent N0.:
`(45) Date of Patent:
`
`(54) FORMULATION AND SYSTEM FOR INTRA-
`ORAL DELIVERY OF PHARMACEUTICAL
`AGENTS
`(76) Inventors; Randal] McCoy, 10 High CL, Little
`Falls, NJ (US) 08551; Robert O.
`Williams, III, 4514 Rapid Springs
`Cove, Austin, TX (US) 78746; Miles A,
`Libbey, HI, 2 Blue Spruce DR,
`Pennington, NJ (US) 08534
`
`OTHER PUBLICATIONS
`
`Aungst et al, Comparison of the effects of various transmu
`cosal absorption promoterson buccal insulin delivery, Inter
`national Journal of Pharmaceutics, 1989, pp. 227—235.*
`
`Senel et al, Drug permeation enhancement via buccal route:
`possibilities and limitations, Journal of Controlled Release
`2001 pp 133_144 *
`
`( * ) Notice:
`
`Subject to any disclaimer, the term of this
`patent is extended or adjusted under 35
`U.S.C. 154(b) by 0 days.
`
`_
`_
`* Clted by examlner
`
`(21) Appl. No.: 09/944,492
`(22) Filed
`Au 3 0 2001
`'
`g‘
`’
`Prior Publication Data
`
`(65)
`
`US 2002/0055496 A1 May 9, 2002
`
`Related US. Application Data
`
`_
`_
`_
`_
`(63) Continuation of application No. 09/502,871, ?led on Feb.
`11’ 2009
`(60) ligg‘gsional application NO- 60/119,923, ?led On Feb- 12,
`'
`7
`(51) Int. Cl. .......................... .. A61K 9/12; A61K 9/10;
`A61K 38/10- A61K 38/28
`424/45_ 424M} 514/2
`’
`514/3’. 514/4;
`
`(52) U S C]
`i
`l
`l """"""""""""""" "
`
`(58) Field of Search ....................... .. 424/45, 43; 514/2,
`514/3, 4
`
`(56)
`
`References Cited
`
`U_S_ PATENT DOCUMENTS
`
`5,011,678 A * 4/1991 Wang et al. ................ .. 424/45
`
`5,047,230 A * 9/1991 Nagy et al. . . . . . . .
`. . . .. 424/45
`5,288,498 A * 2/1994 Stanley et al. ............ .. 424/440
`
`Primary Examiner—Jose‘ G. Bees
`Assistant Examiner—M. Haghighatian
`(74) Attorney, Agent,
`or Firm—MatheWs, Collins,
`Shepherd & McKay, PA.
`
`(57)
`
`ABSTRACT
`
`A stable formulation is disclosed that enables the effective
`intra-oral delivery to a patient of a pharmaceutical agent.
`
`The formulation comprises the pharmaceutical agent mixed
`_
`_
`_
`With an orally-acceptable oral-absorption enhancer in an
`orally-acceptable carrier-solvent, Wherein the oral
`absorption enhancer is adapted to modify the surface mem
`brane Suchthat absor tionthrou h the Surface membrane is
`p
`g
`initiated or increased. The oral-absorption enhancer may
`comprise hydroXypropyl-beta-cyclodeXtrin and surfactants
`
`including benzalkonium Ch1°ride> benzethonium Ch1°ride>
`polysorbate 80, sodium lauryl sulfate, Brij surfactants,
`TWeen and Pluronic surfactants. Also disclosed is a system
`for delivering the formulation including a mechanism for
`dispensing predetermined doses of the inventive formulation
`intra-orally as With an aerosol or spray pump or propellant
`device.
`
`27 Claims, 4 Drawing Sheets
`
`
`
`
`
`TIME POSI ACTUAIIU N (MINI
`
`

`
`U.S. Patent
`
`Dec. 17, 2002
`
`Sheet 1 0f 4
`
`US 6,495,120 B2
`
`—O— AC-Z-no pre
`
`+ AConirol
`
`0 0
`
`0 8
`
`0 lo
`
`PEREENT CHANGE FROM BASELINE
`
`FIG. 1.
`
`Page 2
`
`

`
`U.S. Patent
`
`Dec. 17, 2002
`
`Sheet 2 of 4
`
`US 6,495,120 B2
`
`[-
`kn’Lu
`-5
`
`—I—SUBJECT2 ,_
`
`
`TIME(DOSE@l0:04=T|ME0:00)
`
`£2a
`
`n
`
`F|G.2.
`
`
`
`DOSlNG=2SPRAYSOF17IUINSULIN/SPRAY
`
`E1
`I---
`
`8
`l''—
`
`$
`co
`
`3
`«:9
`
`3
`<-
`
`CD
`61
`
`1
`
`(IP/5w)1aAa13so)n19
`
`Page 3
`
`Page 3
`
`

`
`U.S. Patent
`
`Dec. 17, 2002
`
`Sheet 3 0f 4
`
`US 6,495,120 B2
`
`III)
`I05 I
`I00 \
`95 W 90
`
`85
`
`80
`
`75
`
`70
`
`65
`
`0
`
`I
`
`I
`
`I
`
`I
`
`I
`
`I
`
`0 20 40 60 80 I00 I20 I40 I60 I80 200 220 240 260 280 300
`TIME POST ACTUATION (MINUTES)
`
`I
`
`l
`
`I
`
`I
`
`I
`
`I
`
`I
`
`I
`
`FIG. 3.
`
`Page 4
`
`

`
`U.S.
`Patent
`
`Dec. 17, 2002
`
`Sheet 4 0f 4
`
`US 6,495,120 B2
`
`-| O O
`
`A
`M/\ A
`v WAN
`\/
`
`‘
`
`0 2'0
`
`4'0
`
`6'0
`
`0'0 100 120 1110100100 200220 2210200 200300
`TIME POST ACTUATION (MINUTES)
`
`FIG. 4.
`
`Page 5
`
`

`
`US 6,495,120 B2
`
`1
`FORMULATION AND SYSTEM FOR INTRA
`ORAL DELIVERY OF PHARMACEUTICAL
`AGENTS
`
`RELATED APPLICATIONS
`
`CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED
`APPLICATIONS
`
`This is a continuation of the prior application Ser. No.
`09/502,871, ?led Feb. 11, 2000.
`This application is related to, and claims the bene?t of
`priority under, US. provisional patent application Ser. No.
`60/119,923, ?led Feb. 12, 1999.
`
`FIELD OF THE INVENTION
`
`This invention relates to a formulation effective for the
`intra-oral delivery of pharmaceutical agents and to a system
`comprising the formulation in a metered-dose applicator
`device for dispensing the pharmaceutical agents intra-orally.
`
`BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
`
`The poor aqueous solubility and the hydrophobic nature
`of many therapeutic agents prevent them from being suitable
`for conventional oral delivery, due to their poor absorption
`and bioavailability. In other cases, the current means of
`delivery are primarily limited to parental means, often
`compromising the desired level of patient compliance. Many
`small and large molecule proteins and peptides are effective
`therapeutically, yet are not ordinarily easily absorbed
`through, or are otherWise not effective When administered
`through, the GI tract, including insulin, calcitonin, human
`groWth factors, and others.
`Dif?culties inhere in administering certain pharmaceuti
`cal agents orally (such as proteins), as saliva and/or gas
`trointestinal compounds tend to degrade or digest the phar
`maceutical agents, rendering them ineffective. For eXample,
`patients suffering from diabetes are required to administer
`insulin to themselves by injection on a regular basis. Injec
`tion delivery of insulin and other drugs is inconvenient and
`can be painful, discomforting, and embarrassing.
`Injectionable drug delivery also may be used to achieve a
`quick and ef?cient administration. Chronic pain manage
`ment is an area Where speedy drug delivery is desired. For
`eXample, there is a signi?cant increase in the prevalence and
`number of cancer deaths WorldWide. Pain occurs in more
`than 80% of cancer patients before death. Because of its high
`frequency, combined With the lack of availability of opioids
`in many countries and the under-treatment of pain, the World
`Health OrganiZation in declared pain a World medical emer
`gency in 1986. Since then, emphasis has been on the
`appropriate treatment of cancer pain. As a result, the use of
`opioid analgesics has increased WorldWide. Fentanyl is an
`opioid analgesic commonly used in chronic pain manage
`ment. Currently, research is being conducted Which searches
`for alternative means of quickly and effectively administer
`ing this drug.
`Efforts to achieve quicker and more convenient methods
`of drug delivery have involved the development of nasal and
`pulmonary delivery mechanisms. These delivery mecha
`nisms have been available for a select number of pharma
`ceutical agents. For example, aerosol delivery systems With
`various inhalation-actuated aerosol-dispensing devices have
`been employed for treatment of asthma, and recently they
`have been investigating for delivery of insulin. Such devices
`are breath-activated and designed for delivery to the pul
`
`15
`
`25
`
`35
`
`45
`
`55
`
`65
`
`2
`monary system. See, e.g., US. Pat. No. 5,544,646 to Lloyd
`et al., “Systems for the Intrapulmonary Delivery of Aero
`soliZed Aqueous Formulations”; US. Pat. No. 5,320,094 to
`Laube, “Method of Administering Insulin”; and US. Pat.
`No. 4,648,393 to Landis et al., “Breath Activated Medica
`tion Spray”, all of Which are incorporated herein.
`There remains a need for improved formulations and
`methods for delivering pharmaceutical agents to patients. In
`particular, there is a need for a quick and easy method of
`administration that may be used effectively for a Wide range
`of pharmaceutical agents and that avoids long-term toXico
`logical effects as experienced With lung delivery.
`
`SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
`
`The invention comprises a formulation effective for the
`delivery of pharmaceutical agents through the mucosa of the
`intra-oral cavity comprising at least one pharmaceutical
`agent, one or more oral-absorption enhancers, and
`optionally, one or more solvent carriers, propellants (e.g.,
`Where a propellant device is used for delivery), stabiliZers,
`anti-microbial agents, and auXiliary components. The inven
`tion further relates to a system for delivering the formulation
`including a mechanism for dispensing predetermined doses
`of the inventive formulation intra-orally as With an aerosol
`or spray pump or propellant device.
`
`BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES
`
`For a better understanding of the invention, eXemplary
`embodiments are described beloW, considered together With
`the accompanying ?gures, in Which:
`FIG. 1 is a graph shoWing the effect of inventive formu
`lations containing insulin administered to rats intra-orally
`Wherein plot Are?ects application of the invention and plots
`B,C, and D re?ect controls; and
`FIG. 2 is a graph shoWing the effects of inventive formu
`lations containing highly puri?ed porcine insulin adminis
`tered intra-orally to tWo human subjects; and
`FIGS. 3 and 4 are graphs shoWing the effects of inventive
`formulations containing human recombinant insulin admin
`istered intra-orally to tWo human subjects.
`
`DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE
`INVENTION
`
`Applicants have discovered a formulation that enables the
`delivery of pharmaceutical agents through the mucosa of the
`intra-oral cavity. This target site provides a large surface area
`and cell membranes With high permeability and signi?cant
`vasculariZation for rapid and ef?cient drug absorption. The
`formulation of this invention comprises at least one phar
`maceutical agent, one or more oral-absorption enhancers,
`and optionally, one or more solvent carriers, propellants
`(e.g., Where a propellant device is used for delivery),
`stabiliZers, anti-microbial agents, and auXiliary components
`such as ?avor enhancers typically included in orally
`administered formulations. The invention further relates to a
`system for delivering the formulation. The system comprises
`a mechanism for dispensing predetermined doses of the
`inventive formulation intra-orally as With a pump or pro
`pellant device, Which are described further beloW. The
`mechanism is referred to as a metered-dose applicator
`(MDATM), Wherein MDATM is a trademark of MOS, Inc., the
`assignee of the present application (located in Jamesburg,
`NJ
`The invention provides an efficient and convenient drug
`delivery method for many pharmaceutical agents that results
`
`Page 6
`
`

`
`US 6,495,120 B2
`
`3
`in rapid onset of therapeutic action, avoids the hepatic ?rst
`pass effect, and reduces the amount of drug needed for an
`effective doses, thus reducing the cost. With this invention,
`a noninvasive alternative is provided to pulmonary, nasal, or
`gastrointestinal delivery of pharmaceutical agents, and
`absorption is increased and accelerated. The pharmaceutical
`agent can be directly targeted to the intra-oral delivery site
`of absorption through the inventive delivery system Which
`combines appropriate droplet siZe, strength of dose, and
`absorption enhancers formulated to provide optimum bio
`availability and onset of action.
`Additionally, the invention is advantageous for therapeu
`tic reasons. The method of delivery described herein is
`easier, less inconvenient, and/or less-embarrassing than
`other methods of administration, thus increasing patient
`compliance. A further bene?t of oral versus inhalation
`administration is that oral spray delivery does not have the
`same long-term toxicological effects as When inhaling the
`compounds. The invention also is advantageous in deliver
`ing pharmaceutical agents to animals Which often are resis
`tant to traditional means of drug delivery. The inventive
`formulations may be incorporated into morsels including
`meats or ?avor-enhancers to make them more appealing to
`animals (cats and dogs) to enable their oral delivery.
`The formulation of this invention comprises at least one
`pharmaceutical agent. Suitable pharmaceutical agents for
`use in the invention include large and small molecular
`Weight compounds, peptides, polypeptides, and proteins.
`Examples of such compounds include proteins and peptides
`up to 50,000 Datoms, glucocorticoid steroids, testosterone,
`dexamethasone, prednisolone, and salts thereof, prednisone,
`stanoZolol, barbituates, seconal and salts thereof, ben
`ZodiZepines such as ?uraZepam and salts thereof, miscella
`neous sedative hypnotics such as ethchlorvynol and salts.
`Suitable peptides include hormones such as calcitonin,
`leuprolide, human groWth hormone (HGH), glycogen-like
`protein (GLP), and salts thereof, and insulin. Various types
`of insulin may be used, such as bovine, porcine or human
`recombinant insulin. Nitroglycerine also may be used, e.g.,
`as a blood pressure medication to counter heart-attacks.
`Typically, nitro-glycerine is administered in tablet form for
`delivery under the patient’s tongue, but With the instant
`method of delivery, entry of the agent into the patient’s
`bloodstream is accelerated.
`The formulation may comprise one or more analgesics as
`the pharmaceutical agent. For example, non-narcotic anal
`gesics such as ketorolac and salts thereof, and oxandrolone
`may be used, or narcotic analgesics, such as morphine,
`fentanyl and salts thereof, sedative hypnotic agents, and
`codeine fentanyl citrate. Such analgesic formulations can be
`used to control pain in cancer patients undergoing chemo
`therapy Who experience debilitating breakthrough pain.
`Nicotine and related stimulants may also be administered in
`accordance With the invention.
`While concentrations Will vary With the particular phar
`maceutical agents and formulations used, typically the phar
`maceutical agent Will be present in the amount of about 0.01
`to 25% by Weight. For example, embodiments of the for
`mulation comprising use of insulin and fentanyl citrate may
`comprise use of 0.5% W/W of the pharmaceutical agent.
`The inventive formulation further comprises one or more
`oral absorption enhancers. The term “oral absorption
`enhancer” is used herein to refer to compounds that disrupt
`or modify the absorptive surface of the targeted site (such as
`Wetting) to improve absorption across the membrane, either
`alone or as administered With a metered dose applicator. The
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`40
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`60
`
`65
`
`4
`term “intra-oral cavity” refers to all areas Within the mouth,
`including the cheeks, gums, lips, tongue, thorax, back of the
`throat, and beneath the tongue. Typically, the droplet Will be
`siZed Within the range of about 1 to 200 microns, more
`preferably Within the range of 10—100 microns. The droplets
`may be presented to the mucosa Within a liquid, solid, or
`gaseous suspension, including an aerosol system Which
`refers to a gaseous suspension of particles dispensed Within
`the form of a mist.
`The oral-absorption enhancer may comprise one or more
`orally-acceptable surfactants or other compounds. The
`important consideration is that the absorption enhancer be
`effective for preparing the mucosa to absorb the pharma
`ceutical agent. Exemplary, suitable oral absorption enhanc
`ers include hydroxypropyl-beta-cyclodextrin and surfactants
`such as benZalkonium chloride, benZethonium chloride,
`polysorbate 80, sodium lauryl sulfate, Brij surfactants,
`TWeen surfactants, and Pluronic surfactants. Surfactants of
`the Brij family may comprise polyoxy(n)-oleoether, Wherein
`n is from 1 to 100. Notably, one or more of these and/or other
`surfactants may be included for other purposes such as
`increasing the miscibility of the formulation ingredients or
`reducing the siZe of the pharmaceutical agents to droplet
`siZe. In such case, the surfactant is referred to herein as a
`“formulation surfactant.” As used herein, the term “droplet”
`refers to a single unit of atomiZed spray having a suf?ciently
`small siZe that it is capable of being absorbed by a mucosa
`of the intra-oral cavity.
`While the concentration of oral-absorption enhancers Will
`vary With the particular pharmaceutical agents and/or
`method of delivery, typically these components Will be
`present in the amount of up to 50% by Weight, more
`preferably in the range of 0.1% to 20% by Weight, and even
`more preferably at about 110.5% by Weight. For example,
`exemplary embodiments of the formulation comprise use of
`sodium lauryl sulfate at 0.9 to 1.2% by Weight.
`Typically, the formulation Will comprise an orally
`acceptable carrier solvent. The carrier solvent may include
`Water but preferably is non-aqueous. The phrase “substan
`tially nonaqueous” means that in the nonaqueous solvents
`used, all reasonable care is used to avoid exposure to
`atmospheric moisture and remove Water present as hydra
`tion; hoWever, the presence of small amounts of Water in the
`?nished formulation Which have no impact on the properties
`of the formulation can not be precluded. The carrier solvent
`preferably comprises ethanol, glycerol, glycol, propylene
`glycol, polyethylene glycol, sorbitol, vitamin E and deriva
`tives of vitamin E, polyvinylpyrrolidone, Water, and other
`orally-acceptable solvents knoWn in the ?eld. Typically, the
`carrier solvent Will be present in an amount of from 0.5 to
`50% by Weight, more preferably at about 20% by Weight.
`One embodiment of the invention comprises a system for
`formulating and delivering desired pharmaceutical agents
`intra-orally comprising use of a propellant-based assembly,
`and for such cases, the formulation Will comprise use of a
`propellant. Typically, the propellant Will be present in an
`amount of from 20 to 95% by Weight, more preferably at
`about 50—80% by Weight. Various propellants are knoWn in
`the ?eld and discussed in the literature. HoWever, exemplary
`propellants comprise carbon dioxide, and hydro?uoroalkane
`(HFA), Which is available from DuPont Corporation, under
`the tradename HFA 134ATM. Also, HFA compounds referred
`to in the trade as DYMELTM 152A, HFA 152TM, and HFA
`227TM advantageously may be used. Such products are
`knoWn and available in the aerosol industry as earth friendly
`(green) propellants. OZone-depleting propellants, such as
`freone 12, freone 13, butane, and propane, also may be used
`but are less preferred.
`
`Page 7
`
`

`
`US 6,495,120 B2
`
`5
`Also optionally included Within the compositions are
`stabilizers and anti-microbial agents. Stability of the phar
`maceutical agent over an extended storage period may be
`aided by stabiliZers, such as 1% sodium dodecyl sulfate
`solution or benZalkonium chloride. Most proteins degrade in
`the presence of heat. For example, insulin usually must be
`kept refrigerated to be protected from decomposition.
`Additionally, the presence of Water contributes to the
`decomposition of pharmaceutical agents by providing a
`polar vehicle in Which the agents can react. Decomposition
`of the pharmaceutical agents resulting from interaction With
`Water and heat during storage may be reduced by use of
`stabiliZers such as lactic acid, citric acid, and preservative
`systems including benZoic acid, benZyl alcohol, thimerosal,
`phenylethyl alcohol, benZethonium chloride, methyl
`paraben, ethyl paraben, butyl paraben or propyl paraben.
`When included, stabiliZers may comprise up to about 5
`Weight % of the formulation.
`In some forms, such as aqueous-based formulations,
`anti-microbial agents may be included, as microbial groWth
`may affect the chemical stability of the ingredients, safety
`and acceptability of the product, and the physical integrity of
`the system. Lactic acid and citric acid are also exemplary,
`effective anti-microbial agents. The amount of such agents
`desirably included Will depend upon the particular formu
`lation and can be determined by one skilled in the ?eld With
`use of micro-organism groWth tests.
`Optionally, the formulation also may comprise viscosity/
`mucoadhesive enhancing agents such as cellulose ether
`polymers and chitosan; ?avoring agents; and/or preservative
`systems including benZoic acid, benZyl alcohol, thimerosal,
`phenylethyl alcohol, benZethonium chloride, methyl
`paraben, ethyl paraben, butyl paraben or propyl paraben.
`It may include anti-oxidants, kelating agents,
`preservatives, agents to adjust osmolarity, agents to adjust
`pH, and non cross-linked polymers.
`It Will be appreciated that the invention can be used to
`treat a large variety of diseases, including male
`hypogonadism, impotence, pain management, diabetes, and
`osteoporosis, as Well as diseases and disorders requiring the
`administration of small and large molecule proteins and
`peptides.
`The invention further comprises a system for formulating
`and delivering desired pharmaceutical agents intra-orally
`comprising use of a mechanism for delivering predeter
`mined doses of the inventive formulation intra-orally, as
`With a pump or propellant device. Any type of delivery
`mechanism for administering the formulation intra-orally in
`metered doses may be used. For example, the formulation
`can be prepared in a tube (as is used for containing
`toothpaste) having a noZZle thereon for delivering predeter
`mined units of formulation. Metal, glass, plastic, or other
`types of containers can be used.
`The delivery system or metered dose applicator (MDATM)
`can be pressuriZed (pMDATM) or unpressuriZed (MDATM).
`Aerosol-type actuators can by used, applying inhalation and
`pump technology. These actuators may have dual chamber
`systems that alloW for reactive components to be separated
`until the time of delivery, as is important for some active
`pharmaceutical products. The applicators may have special
`iZed combination valves to deliver the product adequately
`and effectively. Thus, the inhalation technology and
`mechanical con?gurations for inhalers can be used With the
`formulations described above to deliver pharmaceutical
`agents intra-orally, not to the lung. For example, the delivery
`mechanism may comprise inhalation actuators and nasal
`
`6
`actuators sold under the tradenames VALOISTM,
`BESPAKTM, and PFIFFERTM. A representative actuator is
`described in US. Pat. No. 5,284,133 to Burns et al., “Inha
`lation Device With a Dose-Timer, An Actuator Mechanism,
`and Patient Compliance Monitoring Means,” Which is incor
`porated herein.
`
`With the pump applicators, the mechanism Will include a
`container or chamber coupled to a pump and actuator. The
`volume of the chamber Will determine the dose that is
`administered With each depression of the pump. The pump
`applies pressure to the formulation disposed Within the
`chamber and causes the formulation to move through the
`actuator. The actuator is adapted to reduce the formulation
`into droplets capable of forming an aerosol spray for oral
`administration. The surfactant or other oral absorption
`enhancer is effective in reducing surface tension in provid
`ing a formulation capable of being reduced to droplet siZe by
`the actuator, forming an aerosol spray. The effectiveness of
`the delivery system is enhanced as the siZe of droplets is
`decreased to the point of Where the particle has a minimum
`aerodynamic particle siZe distribution for effective transport.
`Typically, this is about 10 microns. Adecreased droplet siZe
`translates to a higher surface area to be absorbed by the
`mucosa of the intra-oral cavity. With the propellant device,
`a chamber, valve, and actuator are also used. The formula
`tion is pressured Within the chamber. Depression of the valve
`causes pressure to be released so that the formulation moves
`through the actuator. Again, the actuator is adapted to reduce
`the formulation into droplets for oral administration. The
`surfactant or other oral absorption enhancer is effective in
`providing a formulation capable of being reduced to droplet
`siZe by the actuator.
`
`The folloWing examples Will serve to further typify the
`nature of the invention but should not be construed as a
`limitation on the scope thereof, Which is de?ned by the
`appended claims.
`
`EXAMPLE 1
`
`Ingredients
`
`Pharmaceutical Agent
`Insulin
`Oral absorption enhancer
`Surfactant
`Carrier-solvent
`
`Tris-base
`Ethanol
`
`Balance propellant
`
`% W/W
`
`0.5
`
`1.2
`
`0.48
`20
`
`22.18
`77.82
`
`100
`
`15
`
`25
`
`35
`
`45
`
`55
`
`The ingredients are thoroughly mixed to form a solution.
`The solution is placed Within a container of a propellant
`dispenser and administered orally to provide insulin to a
`patient in need thereof. The 0.5% insulin solution is effective
`in administering 17 units (“International Units” or “U.I.’s”)
`to a patient per dose When a 150 microliter p-MDATM is
`used.
`
`65
`
`Page 8
`
`

`
`US 6,495,120 B2
`
`7
`EXAMPLE 2
`
`Ingredients
`
`Pharmaceutical Agent
`Fentanyl Citrate
`Oral absorption enhancer
`Surfactant
`Carrier-solvent
`Ethanol
`
`Balance propellant
`
`% w/w
`
`0.5
`
`1.2
`
`2O
`
`21.7
`78.3
`
`100
`
`The ingredients are thoroughly mixed to form a solution.
`The solution is placed within a container of a propellant
`dispenser and administered orally to provide pain relief to a
`patient in need thereof. The formulation is effective in
`treating patients suffering from pain associated with cancer
`and chemotherapy.
`
`EXAMPLE 3
`
`Abioavailability study was performed in a rat model, and
`the results are shown in FIG. 1. Plot A of FIG. 1 re?ects a
`formulation containing 30 units (international units or
`“I.U.’s”) of Bovine insulin. To achieve a dose of 30 units, the
`formulation may be prepared essentially as described above
`in Example 1, but using about 1% of the insulin. As can be
`seen, the formulation produced a 45% decrease in blood
`glucose over 90 minutes post administration of the insulin
`formulation. The decrease in blood glucose following
`administration was linear up to 90 minutes post dosing.
`Control formulations were administered and no decrease in
`blood glucose was observed. Plot B, for example, re?ects a
`control comprising no active ingredient (no insulin) and no
`formulation according to the invention. Plot C re?ects a
`control comprising the inventive formulation but without the
`active ingredient. Plot D re?ects a control comprising the
`active ingredient but without the inventive formulation. This
`bioavailability study demonstrated that the method of prepa
`ration and composition of the formulation was effective in
`delivering the insulin to the patient and enabling a signi?
`cant reduction in blood glucose level with an intra-oral
`delivery.
`
`EXAMPLE 4
`
`Insulin formulation and adapted for use in a pMDA, using
`0.5% highly-puri?ed porcine insulin. The lyophiliZed
`human insulin was dispersed along with tris-base
`(introducing initially at about 0.48) and Brij 98 (0.9%) (as a
`dispersing aid) and absorption enhancers (sodium lauryl
`sulfate at 1.2%) and surfactants in hydro?uoroalkane (HFA
`134a) propellant in the presence of ethanol (20%). Here, the
`Brij surfactant comprises a formulation surfactant for
`increasing the formulation miscibility. The dose delivery
`through-the-valve (DDV) (e.g., of the pMDA) was analyzed
`by HPLC for insulin potency assay and degradation prod
`ucts. The ?nished pMDA units were stored at room
`temperature, and the DDV was determined at initial, 1, 2, 3,
`4 and 14 months in order to follow the dosing consistency
`and chemical stability of insulin throughout the storage
`period. The formulation was administered to the intra-oral
`cavity of two humans. Two actuations were delivered into
`the intra-oral cavity of the two humans for each dose.
`
`8
`Aliquots of blood were collected periodically in the next two
`hours following dosing. Hypoglycemic effect was measured
`as the percent change in blood glucose concentration com
`pared with the baseline.
`Stability tests revealed that the prepared insulin pMDA
`units delivered 32 to 38 IU per actuation, and DDV remained
`consistent after four months storage. In addition, no desa
`mido insulin peak was detected for either the initial DDV
`sample or the 1,2,3 or 4 month stability DDV sample,
`indicating that no signi?cant insulin degradation occurred in
`the product during the pMDa preparation process or the
`four-month stability storage period. The human study
`showed that the blood glucose level in humans started to
`decrease 20 minutes after administration of two actuations
`from the pMDA into the intra-oral cavity of humans, and a
`30% decrease in the blood glucose level was observed
`between 40 and 100 minutes after dosing. The blood glucose
`level returned to baseline in 2 hours following the initial
`dosing. The results are plotted in FIG. 2.
`
`EXAMPLE 5
`
`A formulation was prepared essentially as in Example 4,
`except a human recombinant insulin at about 1% was used
`and the concentration of HFA decreased to make up the
`difference. The formulation was administered to two healthy
`male human volunteers (RM and ML). A baseline blood
`glucose level was established for each volunteer prior to the
`experiment. After fasting overnight, each volunteer was
`administered insulin pMDA into the intra-oral cavity. The
`glucodynamic effects were monitored for 5 hours following
`a 12-hour fast and the actuation of the pMDa. The percent
`change in blood glucose level from the baseline was estab
`lished as a function of time to demonstrate the hypoglycemic
`effect.
`Signi?cant hypoglycemic effects were observed in this
`human study. FIGS. 3 and 4 are graphs plotting the glucose
`levels in the human subjects as a function of time, wherein
`each graph relates to a different subject. FIG. 3 pertains to
`subject “RM” after a single actuation of the pMDA. As can
`be seen, the glucose levels decrease along a basically linear
`plot for up to 300 minutes (?ve hours) after the single
`actuation. FIG. 4 pertains to subject “ML”, also after a single
`actuation. Although the glucose levels are more varied,
`overall a generally downward trend is reported. In each case,
`the blood glucose level decreased sharply in the ?rst 20
`minutes after dosing, and the maximum hypoglycemic effect
`was observed between 100 and 150 minutes post dosing.
`As can be seen, a stable propellant-driven pMDa formu
`lation was developed for intra-oral delivery of insulin.
`Intra-oral delivery of insulin employing a pMDA formula
`tion for treating diabetes has been established as feasible in
`this study. The administration was user friendly (no bad taste
`or chilled throat). In addition, administration of the formu
`lation resulted in lowering glucose levels substantially
`below baseline levels.
`
`EXAMPLE 6
`
`Two formulations containing fentanyl citrate were
`prepared, wherein one formulation (identi?ed as 12A) was
`prepared in accordance with Example 2, above, and the
`second formulation (12B) was prepared as per Example 2,
`with the exception that in 12B, water used as the solvent
`carrier in place of ethanol. The formulations were adminis
`tered at pre-determined doses to six different rats and
`righting re?ex was monitored at six different time intervals.
`Two rats under the same formulation lost their righting
`
`10
`
`15
`
`25
`
`35
`
`45
`
`55
`
`65
`
`Page 9
`
`

`
`US 6,495,120 B2
`
`re?ex, both at similar actuation intervals and after consecu
`tive doses, and both regained righting re?exes Within thirty
`four minutes. One of these rats had been administered its
`dose by means of spray actuation and one by pipette. The
`second formulation containing the aqueous base (12B) did
`not appear to have a signi?cant effect on either of the tWo
`rats administered (spray only) With it, as the righting re?ex
`Was regained in a short amount of time.
`The procedure applied in this experiment Was as folloWs:
`The rates Were selected and Weighed. One formulation Was
`administered to each rat at a predetermined dose, the time
`Was noted, and a time clock Was begun. Each rat Was
`monitored for loss of righting re?ex or other signs of
`somnolence at 5, 10, 15, 30, 60, 120 minutes. The time Was
`marked When the righting re?ex Was gone. If righting re?ex
`Was not gone in 30 minutes, the rat Was re-dosed With 2
`actuations and monitored as in time intervals as noted
`immediately above. The time When righting re?ex returned
`Was marked.
`The data and results are reported beloW in Tables I, II, and
`II:
`
`TABLE I
`
`Formulation 12B
`
`Rat #
`
`5 min. 10 min.
`
`15 min.
`
`30 min. 60 min.
`
`120 min.
`
`632
`633
`
`Intact
`Intact
`
`intact
`intact
`
`Intact
`Intact
`
`Intact
`Intact
`
`Intact
`Intact
`
`intact
`intact
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`TABLE II
`
`Formulation 12A
`
`Rat #
`
`5 min. 10 min.
`
`15 min.
`
`30 min. 60 min.
`
`120 min.
`
`35
`
`634
`635
`
`Intact
`Intact
`
`Intact
`Intact
`
`Intact
`Gone
`
`Intact
`Gone
`
`intact
`Intact
`
`intact
`intact
`
`TABLE III
`
`Formulation 2A/50 15g dose administered by pipette
`
`Rat #
`
`5 min. 10 min.
`
`15 min.
`
`30 min. 60 min.
`
`120 min.
`
`636
`637
`
`Intact
`Intact
`
`Intact
`Inta

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket