`To:
`
`Cc:
`Subject:
`Date:
`
`Kellogg, Andrew
`Goldberg, Joshua; jitty.malik@alston.com; lance.soderstrom@alston.com; james.abe@alston.com; Diner, Bryan;
`Hasford, Justin; Ferrill, Elizabeth
`Trials
`RE: IPR2015-00902 and 903 order unsealing information subject to protective order
`Monday, September 19, 2016 10:24:29 AM
`
`Counsel: The panel will issue an order today that addresses the parties’ joint request for an extension of
`time.
`
`Thanks,
`
`Andrew Kellogg,
`Supervisory Paralegal
`Patent Trial and Appeal Board
`USPTO
`andrew.kellogg@uspto.gov
`Direct: 571-272-5366
`
`From: Goldberg, Joshua [mailto:Joshua.Goldberg@finnegan.com]
`Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2016 7:14 PM
`To: Kellogg, Andrew <Andrew.Kellogg@USPTO.GOV>; jitty.malik@alston.com;
`lance.soderstrom@alston.com; james.abe@alston.com; Diner, Bryan <bryan.diner@finnegan.com>;
`Hasford, Justin <Justin.Hasford@finnegan.com>; Ferrill, Elizabeth <Elizabeth.Ferrill@finnegan.com>
`Subject: RE: IPR2015-00902 and 903 order unsealing information subject to protective order
`
`Dear PTAB,
`
`Counsel for Patent Owner did not receive an E2E notification for Paper No. 102, Unsealing
`Information Subject to Protective Order. Furthermore, counsel for Patent Owner did not receive
`notifications for Paper Nos. 99, 100, and 101, the Board’s orders relating to the Patent Owner and
`Petitioner’s Renewed Motions to Seal. Counsel for Petitioner has also experienced technical issues
`with PTAB E2E and has been unable to confirm receipt of all relevant papers. As a result, neither
`party was aware that the requested documents had been placed under seal and accordingly that
`those documents could be expunged and absent any such a motion would be made public.
`
`Accordingly, counsel for Petitioner and Patent Owner jointly requests an extension of the deadline to
`file a motion to expunge to Wednesday, September 21, and that the Board delay the effective date
`of its order of September 7 and keep Petitioner’s confidential documents and Patent Owner’s
`confidential documents under seal until the Board considers each party’s motion to expunge.
`
`Best regards,
`Joshua L. Goldberg
`Backup Counsel for Patent Owner
`
`Joshua L. Goldberg
`Attorney at Law
`
`PTAB Exhibit 3001
`InnoPharma Licensing, Inc. v. Senju Pharm. Co.
`IPR2015-00902
`
`
`
`Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP
`901 New York Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20001-4413
`202.408.6092 | fax 202.408.4400 | joshua.goldberg@finnegan.com
`www.finnegan.com | Bio | LinkedIn | PTAB Guidebook
`
`
`
`From: Kellogg, Andrew [mailto:Andrew.Kellogg@USPTO.GOV]
`Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2016 9:12 AM
`To: jitty.malik@alston.com; lance.soderstrom@alston.com; james.abe@alston.com; Diner, Bryan;
`Hasford, Justin; Goldberg, Joshua
`Subject: IPR2015-00902 and 903 order unsealing information subject to protective order
`
`Counsel,
`
`Can you please confirm that you received the September 7, 2016 Order Unsealing Information Subject to
`Protective Order?
`
`Thank you,
`
`Andrew Kellogg
`Supervisory Paralegal
`Patent Trial and Appeal Board
`USPTO
`andrew.kellogg@uspto.gov
`Direct: 571-272-5366
`
`
`This e-mail message is intended only for individual(s) to whom it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential,
`proprietary, or otherwise exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you believe you have received this message in error, please
`advise the sender by return e-mail and delete it from your mailbox. Thank you.
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
