throbber
Transcript of the Testimony of Ivan T. Hofmann
`
`Date: March 25, 2016
`
`Case: Innpharma Licensing, Inc., et al. v. Senju Pharmaceutical Co.,
`LTD., et al.
`
`THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
`
`Ace-Federal Reporters, Inc.
`Phone: 202-347-3700
`Fax: 202-737-3638
`Email: info@acefederal.com
`Internet: www.acefederal.com
`
`
`
`Page 1 of 241
`
`SENJU EXHIBIT 2273
`INNOPHARMA v. SENJU
`IPR2015-00902
`
`

`
`Ivan T. Hofmann - March 25, 2016
`THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
`
`Page 1
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
` UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
` BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -X
`INNOPHARMA LICENSING INC., INNOPHARMA LICENSING LLC,
` INNOPHARMA INC., INNOPHAMA LLC,
` MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS INC., and MYLAN INC.,
` Petitioner
` v.
`SENJU PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD., BAUSCH & LOMB, INC.
` and BAUSCH & LOMB PHARMA HOLDINGS CORP.
` Patent Owner
` Case IPR2015-00902 (Patent 8,669,290 B2)
` Case IPR2015-00903 (Patent 8,129,431 B2)
`
`- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - X
` CONFIDENTIAL
` DEPOSITION of IVAN T. HOFMANN, CPA/CFF, CLP,
`taken pursuant to Notice, held at the law offices of
`ALSTON & BIRD, LLP, 90 Park Avenue, 15th Floor, New
`York, New York, 10016-1387, on Friday, March 25,
`2016, at 10:00 a.m., before JEANNETTE MCCORMICK, a
`Certified Shorthand Reporter, and a Notary Public.
`
`1-800-336-6646
`
`Ace-Federal Reporters, Inc.
`
`202-347-3700
`
`
`
`Page 2 of 241
`
`

`
`Ivan T. Hofmann - March 25, 2016
`THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
`
`A P P E A R A N C E S:
`
`Page 2
`
` FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, GARRETT
` & DUNNER, LLP
` Attorneys for Patent Owner
` 901 New York Avenue, N.W.
` Washington, D.C. 20001-4413
` BY: BRYAN C. DINER, ESQ.
` (202) 408-4000 (Telephone)
` (202) 408-4400 (Fax)
` bryan.diner@finnegan.com
`
` ALSTON & BIRD, LLP
` Attorneys for Petitioner
` Bank of America Plaza
` 101 South Tyron Street, Suite 4000
` Charlotte, North Carolina 28280-4000 USA
` BY: JOSEPH M. JANUSZ, ESQ.
` (704) 444-1000 (Telephone)
` (704) 444-1738 (Fax)
` joe.janusz@alston.com
`
`1
`
`2 3
`
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`1-800-336-6646
`
`Ace-Federal Reporters, Inc.
`
`202-347-3700
`
`
`
`Page 3 of 241
`
`

`
`Ivan T. Hofmann - March 25, 2016
`THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
`
`Also Present:
` Savanna Stack (Finnegan Henderson)
` Thomas Del Vecchio (Videographer)
`
`Page 3
`
`1
`2
`3
`
`4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`1-800-336-6646
`
`Ace-Federal Reporters, Inc.
`
`202-347-3700
`
`
`
`Page 4 of 241
`
`

`
`Ivan T. Hofmann - March 25, 2016
`THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
`
` I N D E X
`WITNESS EXAMINATION BY PAGE
`
`Page 4
`
`IVAN T. HOFMANN
` MR. DINER 10
`
` E X H I B I T S
`
`NUMBER DESCRIPTION PAGE
`InnoPharma Confidential
`Exhibit 1150 Declaration of Ivan T.
` Hofmann, CPA/CFF, CLP 11
`
`InnoPharma
`Exhibit 1001 U.S. Patent 8,129,431 B2 17
`
`InnoPharma
`Exhibit 1004 U.S. Patent 4,910,225
` Ogawa, et al 21
`
`1
`2
`
`3 4
`
`5
`
`6 7 8
`
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`1-800-336-6646
`
`Ace-Federal Reporters, Inc.
`
`202-347-3700
`
`
`
`Page 5 of 241
`
`

`
`Ivan T. Hofmann - March 25, 2016
`THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
`
`Page 5
`
` I N D E X
` (CONTINUED)
` E X H I B I T S
`NUMBER DESCRIPTION PAGE
` Confidential
`Exhibit 2130 Declaration of John C.
` Jarosz 29
`
`Exhibit 2271 Petitioner's Reply to
` Patent Owner's Response
` to Petition (Paper No. 51)
`56
`
`Exhibit 2221 "Selecting an NSAID for
` Cataract Surgery: What
` Really Matters," Mitchell
` A. Jackson, M.D.
` Bates Nos. PROL0280722 - 48 106
`Exhibit 2227 Abstract, B&L Integrated
` Phase III Clinical Trials
` of Low-Concentration,
` Bates Nos. PROL0284927 149
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`
`8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`1-800-336-6646
`
`Ace-Federal Reporters, Inc.
`
`202-347-3700
`
`
`
`Page 6 of 241
`
`

`
`Ivan T. Hofmann - March 25, 2016
`THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
`
`Page 6
`
` I N D E X
` (CONTINUED)
` E X H I B I T S
`NUMBER DESCRIPTION PAGE
`Exhibit 2223 Abstract, B&L 24-Hour
` Evaluation of Ocular
` Pharmacokinetics of
` 14 C-Labeled Low-Concentration
` Bates Nos. PROL0280755 160
`
`Exhibit 2217 "Introducing Prolensa"
` Bates Nos. PROL0280370 - 71 170
`Exhibit 2220 Prolensa 0.07%
` Bates Nos. PROL0280685 - 702 182
`InnoPharma
`Exhibit 1151 24-Hour Evaluation of the
` Ocular Distribution of
` 14C-Labeled Bromfenac
` Following Topical
` Instillation into the Eyes
` of New Zealand White Rabbits
` Bates Nos. PROL0167067 - 73 198
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`1-800-336-6646
`
`Ace-Federal Reporters, Inc.
`
`202-347-3700
`
`
`
`Page 7 of 241
`
`

`
`Ivan T. Hofmann - March 25, 2016
`THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
`
`Page 7
`
` I N D E X
` (CONTINUED)
` E X H I B I T S
`NUMBER DESCRIPTION PAGE
`Exhibit 2228 Bromfenac Ophthalmic Solution
` 0.07% Dosed Once Daily for
` Cataract Surgery (9 pages) 204
`Exhibit 2226 Cataract Discussion Groups
` Bates Nos. PROL0280867 - 93 214
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`1-800-336-6646
`
`Ace-Federal Reporters, Inc.
`
`202-347-3700
`
`
`
`Page 8 of 241
`
`

`
`Ivan T. Hofmann - March 25, 2016
`THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
`
`Page 8
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
` THE VIDEOGRAPHER: Good morning. We are
` now on the record. Please note that the
` microphones are sensitive and may pick up
` whispering and private conversations. Please
` turn off all cell phones or place them away
` from the microphones as they may interfere
` with the deposition audio. Recording will
` continue until parties agree to go off the
` record.
` This is the deposition of Mr. Ivan T.
` Hofmann in the matter of InnoPharma
` Licensing, Inc., et al, Petitioner, versus
` Senju Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., et al, Patent
` Owners, Case Numbers 1 -- I'm sorry -- I
` think it's IPR2015-00902 (Patent No.
` 8,669,290 B2), also IPR2015-00903 (Patent No.
` 8,129,431 B2) in the United States Patent and
` Trademark Office Before the Patent Trial and
` Appeals Board.
` This deposition is being taken at the
` office of Alston & Bird, 90 Park Avenue, New
` York, New York, 10016.
`
`1-800-336-6646
`
`Ace-Federal Reporters, Inc.
`
`202-347-3700
`
`
`
`Page 9 of 241
`
`

`
`Ivan T. Hofmann - March 25, 2016
`THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
`
`Page 9
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
` The time is approximately 10:13 a.m.
` Today's date is Friday, March 25th, 2016.
` The court reporter today is Jeannette
` McCormick with the firm of Ace-Federal
` Reporters. I am the video operator, Thomas
` Del Vecchio, representing the firm of
` Ace-Federal Reporters, Inc., 1625 I Street,
` Northwest, Washington, D.C., 20006.
` Will counsel please identify themselves
` and who they represent.
` MR. DINER: Bryan Diner, counsel for
` plaintiffs, from the law firm of Finnegan
` Henderson, and with me is my colleague
` Savanna Stack also from Finnegan.
` MR. JANUSZ: Joe Janusz of Alston & Bird
` for Petitioners.
` THE VIDEOGRAPHER: Thank you. Now will
` the court reporter please swear in the
` witness.
`
` IVAN T. HOFMANN, CPA/CFF, CLP,
` having been first duly sworn
`
`1-800-336-6646
`
`Ace-Federal Reporters, Inc.
`
`202-347-3700
`
`
`
`Page 10 of 241
`
`

`
`Ivan T. Hofmann - March 25, 2016
`THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
`
` testified as follows:
`
`Page 10
`
` EXAMINATION
`BY MR. DINER:
` Q. Good morning, Mr. Hofmann. How are you
`today?
` A. Good. How are you, Mr. Diner?
` Q. I'm fine. Thank you.
` A. Good.
` Q. For the sake of formalities, will you please
`state your name and address for the record.
` A. Yeah. My name is Ivan T. Hofmann, and I live
`at 169 Southridge Drive, Cranbury Township,
`Pennsylvania, 16066.
` Q. Okay. I just --
` A. I assume you wanted my residential address?
` Q. That's fine.
` A. Okay.
` Q. And you have been deposed before correct,
`Mr. Hofmann?
` A. I have.
` Q. Any reason why you cannot testify truthfully
`
`1
`
`2 3
`
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`1-800-336-6646
`
`Ace-Federal Reporters, Inc.
`
`202-347-3700
`
`
`
`Page 11 of 241
`
`

`
`Ivan T. Hofmann - March 25, 2016
`THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
`
`Page 11
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`and accurately today?
` A. No, sir.
` THE VIDEOGRAPHER: Excuse me. Can you
` raise your microphone all the way up. Thank
` you.
`BY MR. DINER:
` Q. Mr. Hofmann, I'm handing you the first
`Exhibit Hofmann 1 which has been marked as Innopharma
`Exhibit 1150.
` Is this your declaration in this matter?
` A. It appears to be, yes.
` MR. JANUSZ: I just want to note, I
` don't know if it's true for all copies, but I
` think page 80, one of the exhibits in the
` back is missing. I believe it would be
` Exhibit D-1.
` MR. DINER: Oh, you're right.
` THE WITNESS: Actually, it seems to be
` pervasive issue in the copy. The page order
` skips a page. Now that I look at it more
` closely, I'm missing every other page. It
` seemed a little bit thin.
`
`1-800-336-6646
`
`Ace-Federal Reporters, Inc.
`
`202-347-3700
`
`
`
`Page 12 of 241
`
`

`
`Ivan T. Hofmann - March 25, 2016
`THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
`
`Page 12
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
` MR. DINER: Could we go off the record
` for a minute?
` MR. JANUSZ: Yes.
` THE VIDEOGRAPHER: The time is
` approximately 10:17 a.m. We're off the
` record.
` (Recess from 10:17 to 10:20.)
` THE VIDEOGRAPHER: The time is
` approximately 10:20 a.m. We're back on the
` record.
`BY MR. DINER:
` Q. Mr. Hofmann, do you consider yourself an
`expert in pharmacology?
` A. Not from any technical perspective. I
`certainly have expertise in the economics within the
`pharmaceutical industry though.
` Q. Okay. And you're not an expert in pharmacy
`from a technical perspective, correct?
` A. From a technical perspective, no. From the
`economics of the implications of distribution of
`pharmaceuticals I am.
` Q. Okay. And you're not a medical doctor; is
`
`1-800-336-6646
`
`Ace-Federal Reporters, Inc.
`
`202-347-3700
`
`
`
`Page 13 of 241
`
`

`
`Ivan T. Hofmann - March 25, 2016
`THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
`
`Page 13
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`that correct?
` A. I'm not a medical doctor, no.
` Q. And you've never administered medication to a
`patient, correct?
` A. I have not.
` Q. As a licensed medical doctor, right?
` A. Correct. I guess I've given my daughter
`Tylenol.
` Q. And you've never administered any
`bromfenac-containing products to a patient, correct?
` A. No, sir.
` Q. Okay. And you have never done any research
`of a technical nature on a bromfenac product; is
`that correct?
` A. Not from a technical perspective, no.
` Q. And you've never conducted any research from
`a technical perspective on any product containing
`tyloxapol, correct?
` A. Again, not from a technical perspective, but
`certainly, obviously, in this case I have from an
`economic perspective.
` Q. And you're not an expert in formulating
`
`1-800-336-6646
`
`Ace-Federal Reporters, Inc.
`
`202-347-3700
`
`
`
`Page 14 of 241
`
`

`
`Ivan T. Hofmann - March 25, 2016
`THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
`
`Page 14
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`pharmaceutical products, correct?
` A. Again, not a formulation expert from a
`technical perspective, but I've analyzed patent
`issues involving formulations and the economic
`implications therein on multiple occasions.
` Q. Okay. And neither are you an expert in the
`technical area of chemistry, right?
` A. I am not a technical expert in chemistry.
` Q. And I apologize if I've asked this question
`already, but you are not a pharmacist or an expert
`in pharmacy, correct?
` A. I think you did ask that. I think my
`response was I'm not a pharmacist from any sort of
`distribution of prescription pharmaceuticals from a,
`you know, complying with a prescription from a
`pharmacist as a pharmacist, but I certainly am
`well-versed in the issues, the economic issues, the
`implications of the distribution of prescription
`pharmaceutical products.
` Q. Okay. Now, in connection with your opinions
`in this case, did you consider U.S. Patent No.
`8,669,290?
`
`1-800-336-6646
`
`Ace-Federal Reporters, Inc.
`
`202-347-3700
`
`
`
`Page 15 of 241
`
`

`
`Ivan T. Hofmann - March 25, 2016
`THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
`
`Page 15
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
` A. Yes.
` Q. And in connection with your opinions in this
`case, did you consider Patent No. 8,129,431?
` A. Yes.
` Q. And if I refer to U.S. Patent No. 8,129,431
`as the '431 patent, will you understand what I mean?
` A. I will.
` Q. And, similarly, if I refer to U.S. Patent
`8,669,290 as the '290 patent, will you understand
`what I mean by that?
` A. I will.
` Q. Okay. Thank you. Now, in connection with
`your opinions in this case, did you consider the
`claims of the '290 and '431 patents?
` A. I did.
` Q. And is it your understanding of the claims of
`those patents that they contain -- strike that.
` Or is it your understanding of the claims of
`those patents that they claim aqueous liquid
`preparations containing at least bromfenac and
`tyloxapol?
` A. Right. They don't claim as novel the
`
`1-800-336-6646
`
`Ace-Federal Reporters, Inc.
`
`202-347-3700
`
`
`
`Page 16 of 241
`
`

`
`Ivan T. Hofmann - March 25, 2016
`THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
`
`Page 16
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`compound bromfenac itself, but they do claim a
`formulation that contains bromfenac and tyloxapol.
` Q. And the claim of the patentees is that these
`claims that recite aqueous liquid preparations
`containing bromfenac and tyloxapol is that they are
`novel, correct?
` A. That's the claim.
` Q. So, is it fair to say that the patentees in
`this matter consider aqueous liquid pharmaceutical
`compositions containing bromfenac and tyloxapol as a
`unique aspect of their claimed invention?
` MR. JANUSZ: Objection to scope, and
` calls for speculation.
` THE WITNESS: I mean, when you get into
` formulation and the technical aspects of the
` particular claims, I would defer to technical
` experts, but my understanding in forming my
` opinions is that the asserted claims do
` include what you described.
` Q. And what I described is the novel aspect of
`those claims as considered by the patent -- by
`patent owners here to be bromfenac in combination
`
`1-800-336-6646
`
`Ace-Federal Reporters, Inc.
`
`202-347-3700
`
`
`
`Page 17 of 241
`
`

`
`Ivan T. Hofmann - March 25, 2016
`THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
`
`Page 17
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`with tyloxapol, correct?
` MR. JANUSZ: Same objection.
` THE WITNESS: Well, I mean, again, I'd
` defer to technical experts. I think there's
` great dispute over whether there's novelty to
` those claims, but yes, they -- the patentee
` claims that that combination and aqueous
` dosage form is novel.
` Q. Okay. And in connection with your opinions
`in this case, did you happen to observe that some of
`the claims of the '431 patent have a specific amount
`of tyloxapol recited in them?
` A. Yes.
` Q. And do you recall if that specific amount was
`0.02 percent tyloxapol?
` A. I don't know that I committed all the numbers
`to memory. Perhaps if I had it in front of me, I'd
`be able to confirm that, but it sounds familiar.
` Q. Mr. Hofmann, I'm handing you what has
`previously been marked as InnoPharma Exhibit 1001.
` A. Okay.
` Q. Is this the '431 patent that we were speaking
`
`1-800-336-6646
`
`Ace-Federal Reporters, Inc.
`
`202-347-3700
`
`
`
`Page 18 of 241
`
`

`
`Ivan T. Hofmann - March 25, 2016
`THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
`
`Page 18
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`of just a moment ago?
` A. It appears to be.
` Q. And would you refer to claim 6 of the '431
`patent at column 12 thereof?
` A. Um-mm. I'm sorry. Yes.
` Q. And does claim 6 recite, "The aqueous liquid
`preparation according to claim 4, wherein the
`concentration of the tyloxapol is about 0.02 weight
`per volume percent"?
` A. I'm not a patent lawyer. I'm not a technical
`expert. That appears to be a dependent claim that
`does say what you said it does.
` Q. Okay. So, it particularly specifies the
`amount of the concentration of tyloxapol as about
`0.02 weight per volume percent, correct?
` A. That's what appears.
` Q. Okay. And same question. Mr. Hofmann, if
`you could please turn to column 13, and in
`particular claim 15. And does claim 15 specifically
`recite that the concentration of tyloxapol is about
`0.02 weight per volume percent?
` A. Again, not as a patent lawyer or a technical
`
`1-800-336-6646
`
`Ace-Federal Reporters, Inc.
`
`202-347-3700
`
`
`
`Page 19 of 241
`
`

`
`Ivan T. Hofmann - March 25, 2016
`THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
`
`Page 19
`expert, it does as a dependent claim appear to claim
`that weight per volume ratio that you described.
` Q. Okay. And if you could please turn to column
`14, claim 20. And can you tell me if claim 20 also
`recites for the claim aqueous liquid preparation a
`concentration of tyloxapol of about 0.02 weight per
`volume percent?
` A. You said claim 20?
` Q. Yes, please.
` A. Again, not as a patent lawyer or a technical
`expert, it appears as a dependent claim that it
`includes, among other things, the weight-to-volume
`ratio you described.
` Q. Okay. Is it your understanding that
`tyloxapol is a surfactant?
` A. Yes.
` Q. Are you familiar with the products Xibrom
`or -- strike that.
` Are you familiar with the product Xibrom?
` A. I am from a commercial perspective.
` Q. Does Xibrom contain a surfactant?
` A. My understanding is it does.
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`1-800-336-6646
`
`Ace-Federal Reporters, Inc.
`
`202-347-3700
`
`
`
`Page 20 of 241
`
`

`
`Ivan T. Hofmann - March 25, 2016
`THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
`
`Page 20
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
` Q. Okay. And is the amount of surfactant in
`Xibrom -- sorry -- strike that.
` Is the surfactant in Xibrom polysorbate 80?
` A. Again, not from a technical or a formulation
`expert perspective, but yes, my understanding is it
`contains polysorbate 80.
` Q. Okay. Is it also your understanding that the
`petitioners in this case are of the view that the
`product Xibrom is an embodiment of the prior patent
`known as the Ogawa patent?
` MR. JANUSZ: Objection to scope.
` THE WITNESS: So, with respect to the
` technical aspects of prior art and the
` assertions of the petitioners, I would defer
` to the technical experts.
` My opinions are focused on secondary
` considerations from an economic perspective,
` but I have reviewed technical expert reports
` and I understand that there is -- there are
` assertions with respect to that prior art.
` Q. Have you considered the Ogawa patent before
`in connection with your opinions in your
`
`1-800-336-6646
`
`Ace-Federal Reporters, Inc.
`
`202-347-3700
`
`
`
`Page 21 of 241
`
`

`
`Ivan T. Hofmann - March 25, 2016
`THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
`
`Page 21
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`declaration?
` MR. JANUSZ: Objection to scope.
` THE WITNESS: I think my opinions are
` contained in my report. They explain the
` basis and foundations therein. Included
` therein are various technical expert reports
` and declarations which include that as prior
` art.
` Q. I'd like to hand you the next exhibit which
`is InnoPharma Exhibit 1004, previously marked as
`such.
` Have you seen InnoPharma Exhibit 1004 before?
` A. Yes.
` Q. And have you considered it in connection with
`your opinions in this matter?
` A. Yes.
` Q. Okay.
` A. Again, not from a technical perspective.
` Q. And is Exhibit 1004 a copy of U.S. Patent
`4,910,225 to Ogawa, et al?
` A. Yes.
` Q. And if I refer to this as the Ogawa patent,
`
`1-800-336-6646
`
`Ace-Federal Reporters, Inc.
`
`202-347-3700
`
`
`
`Page 22 of 241
`
`

`
`Ivan T. Hofmann - March 25, 2016
`THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
`
`Page 22
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`you understand what I mean?
` A. Yes.
` Q. Okay. So, is it your understanding that
`Xibrom is an embodiment of the Ogawa patent?
` A. Yes. Again, not from a technical
`perspective, but that's my understanding.
` Q. With regard to the Xibrom product and the
`surfactant that is contained in it, do you
`understand that that surfactant polysorbate 80 is
`present in a concentration of 0.15 weight per volume
`percent?
` A. That, again, not from a technical or
`formulation perspective, but that sounds familiar,
`yes.
` Q. And so, with the disclaimers that you put
`into your answers, is it your understanding that the
`amount of polysorbate 80 in Xibrom is 0.15 weight
`per volume percent?
` A. Again, subject to not from a technical or
`formulation perspective, I think that's my
`understanding.
` Q. Okay. So, as between the amount of
`
`1-800-336-6646
`
`Ace-Federal Reporters, Inc.
`
`202-347-3700
`
`
`
`Page 23 of 241
`
`

`
`Ivan T. Hofmann - March 25, 2016
`THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
`
`Page 23
`polysorbate 80 in Xibrom and the amount of tyloxapol
`as recited in the claims of the '431 patent, is it
`fair to say that the amount of tyloxapol is at a
`lower or a reduced concentration compared to the
`amount of polysorbate 80 in Xibrom?
` A. I mean, from a numeric percentage perspective
`as a non-technical expert, as a non-formulation
`expert, the numbers are what they are. It is a
`reduced concentration. Whether that has any
`meaningful implication with respect to the
`formulation or clinical implications, I would defer
`to, you know, to technical folks as opposed to
`economics.
` I think that, with that distinction, I
`haven't seen any meaningful implication with respect
`to the commercial side of things.
` Q. I believe you said in your previous answer
`that it -- that the amount of tyloxapol in the
`claims of the '431 is at a reduced concentration; is
`that correct?
` MR. JANUSZ: Objection.
` Mischaracterizes prior testimony.
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`1-800-336-6646
`
`Ace-Federal Reporters, Inc.
`
`202-347-3700
`
`
`
`Page 24 of 241
`
`

`
`Ivan T. Hofmann- March 25, 2016
`THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
`
`Page 24
`
`THE WITNESS:
`
`I mean,
`
`I think my answer
`
`was, again, as a non-formulation expert, as a
`
`non-technical expert, the percentages --
`
`sure, as a mathematic exercise, are lower,
`
`but I just want to be careful as to whether
`
`there are any meaningful implications as a
`
`result of that.
`
`Q.
`
`I'm not asking you right now whether or not
`
`there are any meaningful implication as a result of
`
`the difference in concentration.
`
`I'm just asking,
`
`and really picking up on words that you used in your
`
`answer two answers ago, that the amount of tyloxapol
`
`and its concentrations is reduced compared to the
`
`amount of polysorbate 80 used in Xibrom, for
`
`example?
`
`A. As a simple exercise of math,
`
`I don't
`
`disagree with you.
`
`Q. Okay. You're familiar with the product
`
`Prolensa, correct?
`
`A.
`
`I am.
`
`•
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`l-800-336-6646
`
`Ace-Federal Reporters, Inc.
`
`202-347-3700
`
`Page 25 of 241
`
`
`
`

`
`Ivan T. Hofmann- March 25, 2016
`THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
`
`Page 25
`
`•
`
`Q.
`
`I'd like to hand you the next exhibit,
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6 Mr. Hofmann. This is InnoPharma Exhibit 1001 in IPR
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`proceeding 2015-00902 that pertains to the '290
`
`patent.
`
`So, because we have two exhibits that are
`
`10 marked as --
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`1 8
`
`1 9
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`A. Yeah, that
`
`Q.
`
`-- Exhibit 1001, I'm just going to refer to
`
`them by their patent numbers just to keep the record
`
`clear.
`
`Is that okay?
`
`A. Yeah.
`
`I think that makes sense.
`
`Q. Okay. And so, the document you have before
`
`you that I've just handed to you, we're just going
`
`to refer to this for now as the '290 patent. Okay?
`
`A. That's fine.
`
`Q.
`
`In connection with your opinions in this
`
`case, have you considered the '290 patent?
`
`A. Yes, sir.
`
`1-800-336-6646
`
`Ace-Federal Reporters, Inc.
`
`202-347-3700
`
`Page 26 of 241
`
`

`
`Ivan T. Hofmann - March 25, 2016
`THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
`
`Page 26
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
` Q. Okay. And if you could please turn to the
`claims of this patent beginning on column 12 of the
`'290 patent?
` A. Okay.
` Q. And turning first to claim 11 at the bottom
`of column 12 of the '290 patent, does claim 11
`recite an aqueous liquid preparation that
`specifically contains a concentration of tyloxapol
`from about 0.01 weight per volume percent to about
`0.05 weight per volume percent?
` A. As a non-technical expert and a
`non-formulation expert, claim 11, which appears to
`be a dependent claim, contains the language you
`described as well as other aspects.
` Q. And that amount of, or that concentration of
`tyloxapol as recited in claim 11 is at a reduced
`amount compared with polysorbate 80 as contained in
`Xibrom, correct?
` MR. JANUSZ: Objection to scope.
` THE WITNESS: I think subject to a few
` answers ago where I caveated that I'm not a
` technical expert or a formulation expert, but
`
`1-800-336-6646
`
`Ace-Federal Reporters, Inc.
`
`202-347-3700
`
`
`
`Page 27 of 241
`
`

`
`Ivan T. Hofmann - March 25, 2016
`THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
`
`Page 27
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
` as a math question, weight-per-volume ratio
` of polysorbate 80, as I understand it, is
` higher in the Bromday and Xibrom
` formulations.
` Q. Okay. Okay. So, quickly --
` MR. DINER: Thank you for making copies
` of the declaration of Ivan Hofmann.
` Q. And, Mr. Hofmann, I'm going to re-hand you a
`copy of what appears to be your declaration in these
`matters. And this is --
` MR. DINER: Could you put a sticker on
` it?
` MS. STACK: Okay.
` (Discussion off the record.)
` MR. JANUSZ: Just to clarify, I know
` that that's the protective order of material
` version, but I do know that, obviously, the
` redacted public version should have an
` exhibit number when we filed.
` MS. STACK: The redacted version? I can
` double-check, but I believe it's --
` MR. JANUSZ: If you want to put a new
`
`1-800-336-6646
`
`Ace-Federal Reporters, Inc.
`
`202-347-3700
`
`
`
`Page 28 of 241
`
`

`
`Ivan T. Hofmann - March 25, 2016
`THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
`
`Page 28
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
` number on it, that's fine. If you wanted to
` refer to Exhibit, I want to say it was 1150,
` but that's fine.
` MR. DINER: You mean in terms of the
` redacted version? This is the unredacted
` version.
` MR. JANUSZ: Right. Right. Right. But
` it should -- I mean, it would correlate to
` the same exhibit number. That's fine. If
` you guys want to do that, that's fine.
` MS. STACK: The redacted version is 1150
` and then we can use 1150 for the unredacted
` version.
` MR. JANUSZ: That's fine.
`BY MR. DINER:
` Q. So, Mr. Hofmann, I'm handing you again Innopharma
`Exhibit 1150, which I believe is a complete copy now
`of your declaration in this matter.
` A. I haven't studied every page, but it appears
`to be, yes.
` Q. It appears to be a copy of your declaration?
` A. Yes.
`
`1-800-336-6646
`
`Ace-Federal Reporters, Inc.
`
`202-347-3700
`
`
`
`Page 29 of 241
`
`

`
`Ivan T. Hofmann - March 25, 2016
`THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
`
`Page 29
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
` Q. And did you also happen to notice that it's
`in color?
` A. This time, yes.
` Q. Okay. And if you could turn in your
`declaration to page 73 and confirm that that's your
`signature appearing on that page?
` A. I'd just point out there's two different
`pagination references. There's the center page 73
`that you referred to and then there's I think the
`IPR reference of page 75, but yes, that is my
`signature that appears there.
` Q. Okay. Are there any changes or corrections
`that you would wish to make to your declaration at
`this time?
` A. None that come to mind.
` Q. You can put this aside for now, but we'll be
`going back to it.
` A. Okay.
` Q. Mr. Hofmann, I'm handing you now what has
`been marked as Senju Exhibit 2130. Take a moment
`and look at that for me, please.
` A. Okay. I've taken a quick look at it.
`
`1-800-336-6646
`
`Ace-Federal Reporters, Inc.
`
`202-347-3700
`
`
`
`Page 30 of 241
`
`

`
`Ivan T. Hofmann - March 25, 2016
`THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
`
`Page 30
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
` Q. Have you seen this document before?
` A. It appears to be a version of the declaration
`of Mr. Jarosz. I noticed on Appendix 11 there's
`some highlights. I don't know if you want that as
`part of the evidentiary record or if you want a
`clean version. We'll trade. This one doesn't have
`the label on it, but we can clean that up at some
`point. Trade again? Okay.
` I'm sorry. Is there a pending question?
` Q. So, did you consider the Declaration of John
`C. Jarosz in connection with your opinions in this
`matter?
` A. I did.
` Q. Okay. Would you please turn to page 35 and
`36 of the Declaration of John Jarosz, and take a
`moment to read paragraph 85, if you will?
` A. 85?
` Q. On page 36.
` A. Yep. Okay. I've re-read it.
` Q. Is it your understanding that Mr. Jarosz has
`been offered into this matter by Patent Owners in
`support of the secondary consideration of commercial
`
`1-800-336-6646
`
`Ace-Federal Reporters, Inc.
`
`202-347-3700
`
`
`
`Page 31 of 241
`
`

`
`Ivan T. Hofmann - March 25, 2016
`THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
`
`Page 31
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`success?
` A. Yes, by the respondents, their licensees, but
`yeah.
` Q. By Senju, et al?
` A. Yes.
` Q. And so as you read paragraph 85 is it your
`unde

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket