`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`MARSHALL DIVISION
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CASE NO. 2:14-cv-00201-JRG
`(LEAD CASE)
`
`
`§§§§§§§§
`
`INNOVATIVE DISPLAY
`TECHNOLOGIES LLC
` Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`HYUNDAI MOTOR COMPANY et al.
` Defendants.
`
`INNOVATIVE DISPLAY
`TECHNOLOGIES LLC
` Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`TOYOTA MOTOR CORPORATION
`et. al.
` Defendants.
`
`
`
`
`
`CASE NO. 2:14-CV-200-JRG
`(Member Case)
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`§§§§§§§§§§
`
`
`ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE
`
`
`This matter having come before this Court upon Unopposed Motion, and the Court being
`
`fully apprised in the matter,
`
`IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
`
`1. Case No. 2:14-cv-200-JRG is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Each party shall
`
`bear its own attorneys’ fees and costs.
`
`2. The Court retains jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the Protective Order entered by
`
`the Court on December 22, 2014 in Case No. 2:14-cv-201-JRG (the Lead Case)
`
`(Document 167), including specifically the provisions that impose continuing
`
`confidentiality obligations after the case terminates and those that require return or
`
`certification of destruction of previously produced confidential documents within sixty
`
`days of final termination.
`
`TOYOTA EXHIBIT 1012
`TOYOTA v IDT
`IPR2015-00896
`
`PAGE 1 OF 2
`
`
`
`Case 2:14-cv-00200-JRG Document 22 Filed 05/20/15 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 91
`Case 2:14—cv—00200—JRG Document 22 Filed 05/20/15 Page 2 of 2 Page|D #: 91
`
`So Ordered and Signed on this
`
`May 20, 2015
`
`
`
`RODNEY GH4 RAP
`
`UNITED STAT
`
`DISTRICT JUDGE
`
`PAGE 2 OF 2
`
`PAGE 2 OF 2