throbber
Optical Components for WDM
`Lightwave Networks
`
`MICHAEL S. BORELLA, MEMBER, IEEE, JASON P. JUE, DHRITIMAN BANERJEE, BYRAV
`RAMAMURTHY, STUDENT MEMBER, IEEE, AND BISWANATH MUKHERJEE, MEMBER, IEEE
`
`Recently, there has been growing interest in developing optical
`fiber networks to support
`the increasing bandwidth demands
`of multimedia applications, such as video conferencing and
`World Wide Web browsing. One technique for accessing the huge
`bandwidth available in an optical fiber is wavelength-division
`multiplexing (WDM). Under WDM, the optical fiber bandwidth
`is divided into a number of nonoverlapping wavelength bands,
`each of which may be accessed at peak electronic rates by
`an end user. By utilizing WDM in optical networks, we can
`achieve link capacities on the order of 50 THz. The success of
`WDM networks depends heavily on the available optical device
`technology. This paper is intended as a tutorial on some of the
`optical device issues in WDM networks. It discusses the basic
`principles of optical transmission in fiber and reviews the current
`state of the art in optical device technology. It introduces some
`of the basic components in WDM networks, discusses various
`implementations of these components, and provides insights into
`their capabilities and limitations. Then, this paper demonstrates
`how various optical components can be incorporated into WDM
`optical networks for both local and wide-area applications. Last,
`the paper provides a brief review of experimental WDM networks
`that have been implemented.
`Keywords—Device issues, experimental systems, lightwave net-
`work, optical amplifier, optical fiber, switching elements, tunable
`receiver, tunable transmitter, wavelength converter, wavelength-
`division multiplexing.
`
`I.
`
`INTRODUCTION
`the field of computer and
`Over the past few years,
`telecommunications networking has experienced tremen-
`dous growth. With the rapidly growing popularity of the
`Internet and the World Wide Web and with the recent
`
`Manuscript received December 9, 1996; revised May 7, 1997. This work
`was supported in part by the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency
`under Contracts DABT63-92-C-0031 and DAAH04-95-1-0487; in part by
`NSF under Grants NCR-9205755, NCR-9508239, and ECS-9521249; in
`part by Pacific Bell; and in part by UC MICRO Program.
`M. S. Borella is with the School of Computer Science, DePaul Univer-
`sity, Chicago, IL 60604 USA (e-mail mborella@cs.depaul.edu).
`J. P. Jue is with the Department of Electrical and Computer En-
`gineering, University of California, Davis, CA 95616 USA (e-mail:
`jue@ece.ucdavis.edu).
`D. Banerjee is with Hewlett-Packard Company, Roseville, CA 95747-
`5557 USA (e-mail:banerjee@rosemail.rose.hp.com).
`B. Ramamurthy and B. Mukherjee are with the Department of Com-
`puter Science, University of California, Davis, CA 95616 USA (e-mail
`byrav@cs.ucdavis.edu; mukherje@cs.ucdavis.edu).
`Publisher Item Identifier S 0018-9219(97)05722-8.
`
`deregulation of the telecommunications industry in the
`United States, this growth can be expected to continue
`in the foreseeable future. The next decade may bring
`to the home and office multiple connections of high-
`definition television, video mail, and digital audio, as well
`as full Internet connections via user-friendly graphic user
`interfaces. As more users start to use data networks, and
`as their usage patterns evolve to include more bandwidth-
`intensive networking applications, there emerges an acute
`need for very high bandwidth transport network facilities
`whose capabilities greatly exceed those of current high-
`speed networks, such as asynchronous transfer mode (ATM)
`networks.
`The key to the future of networks rests in the relatively
`young field of fiber optics. Optical fiber provides the huge
`bandwidth, low loss rate, and cost effectiveness to enable
`the vision of a “global village.” Given that fiber has
`a potential bandwidth of approximately 50 Tb/s—nearly
`four orders of magnitude higher than peak electronic data
`rates—every effort should be made to tap into the capabil-
`ities of fiber-optic networks.
`Wavelength-division multiplexing (WDM) is one promis-
`ing approach that can be used to exploit the huge bandwidth
`of optical fiber. In WDM, the optical transmission spectrum
`is divided into a number of nonoverlapping wavelength (or
`frequency) bands, with each wavelength supporting a single
`communication channel operating at peak electronic speed.
`Thus, by allowing multiple WDM channels to coexist on
`a single fiber, we can tap into the huge fiber bandwidth,
`with the corresponding challenges being the design and de-
`velopment of appropriate network architectures, protocols,
`and algorithms.
`Research and development on optical WDM networks
`have matured considerably over the past few years, and
`a number of experimental prototypes have been and are
`currently being deployed and tested in the United States,
`Europe, and Japan. It is anticipated that the next generation
`of the Internet will employ WDM-based optical backbones.
`The success of WDM networks relies heavily upon
`the available optical components. A block diagram of a
`
`1274
`
`PROCEEDINGS OF THE IEEE, VOL. 85, NO. 8, AUGUST 1997
`
`0018–9219/97$10.00 ª
`
`1997 IEEE
`
`Petitioner Ciena Corp. et al.
`Exhibit 1032-1
`
`

`

`Fig. 1. Block diagram of a WDM transmission system.
`
`WDM communication system is shown in Fig. 1. The
`network medium may be a simple fiber link, a passive
`star coupler (PSC) (for a broadcast and select network),
`or a network of optical or electronic switches and fiber
`links. The transmitter block consists of one or more op-
`tical transmitters, which may be either fixed to a single
`wavelength or tunable across a range of wavelengths.
`Each optical transmitter consists of a laser and a laser
`modulator and may also include an optical filter for tuning
`purposes. If multiple optical transmitters are used, then a
`multiplexer or coupler is needed to combine the signals
`from different laser transmitters onto a single fiber. The
`receiver block may consist of a tunable filter followed
`by a photodetector receiver or a demultiplexer followed
`by an array of photodetectors. Examples of some WDM
`transmitters and receivers are shown in Fig. 2. Amplifiers
`may be required in various locations throughout the network
`to maintain the strength of optical signals.
`Designers of next-generation lightwave networks must
`be aware of the properties and limitations of optical fiber
`and devices in order for their corresponding protocols
`and algorithms to take advantage of the full potential of
`WDM. Often, a network designer may approach the WDM
`architectures and protocols from an overly simplified, ideal,
`or traditional-networking point of view. Unfortunately, this
`may lead an individual to make unrealistic assumptions
`about the properties of fiber and optical components, and
`hence may result in an unrealizable or impractical design.
`This paper serves as an introduction to WDM device
`issues. No background in optics or advanced physics is
`needed. For a more advanced and/or detailed discussion of
`WDM devices, we refer the interested reader to [1]–[6].
`This paper presents an overview of optical fiber and
`devices such as couplers, optical transmitters, optical re-
`ceivers and filters, optical amplifiers, optical routers, and
`switches. It paper attempts to condense the physics behind
`the principles of optical transmission in fiber in order to
`provide some background for the novice reader. WDM
`network-design issues are then discussed in relation to the
`advantages and limits of optical devices. Last, this paper
`demonstrates how these optical components can be used to
`create broadcast networks for local networking applications
`and wavelength-routed networks for wide-area deployment.
`The paper concludes with a note on the current status
`of optical technology and how test networks have used
`some of the optical devices described in this paper with
`a reasonable amount of success.
`
`II. OPTICAL FIBER
`Fiber possesses many characteristics that make it an ex-
`cellent physical medium for high-speed networking. Fig. 3
`shows the two low-attenuation regions of optical fiber [1].
`
`Centered at approximately 1300 nm is a range of 200 nm
`in which attenuation is less than 0.5 dB per kilometer. The
`total bandwidth in this region is about 25 THz. Centered
`at 1550 nm is a region of similar size with attenuation as
`low as 0.2 dB per kilometer. Combined, these two regions
`provide a theoretical upper bound of 50 THz of bandwidth.1
`The dominant loss mechanism in good fibers is Rayleigh
`scattering, while the peak in loss in the 1400-nm region is
`due to hydroxyl-ion (OH ) impurities in the fiber. Other
`sources of loss include material absorption and radiative
`loss.
`By using these large low-attenuation areas for data trans-
`mission, the signal loss for a set of one or more wavelengths
`can be made very small,
`thus reducing the number of
`amplifiers and repeaters needed. In single-channel long-
`distance experiments, optical signals have been sent over
`hundreds of kilometers without amplification. Besides its
`enormous bandwidth and low attenuation, fiber also offers
`low error rates. Fiber-optic systems typically operate at bit
`error rates (BER’s) of less than 10
`.
`The small size and thickness of fiber allows more fiber
`to occupy the same physical space as copper, a prop-
`erty that is desirable when installing local networks in
`buildings. Fiber is flexible, difficult to break, reliable in
`corrosive environments, and deployable at short notice
`(which makes it particularly favorable for military com-
`munications systems). Also, fiber transmission is immune
`to electromagnetic interference and does not cause interfer-
`ence. Last, fiber is made from one of the cheapest and most
`readily available substances on earth, sand. This makes fiber
`environmentally sound; and unlike copper, its use will not
`deplete natural resources.
`
`A. Optical Transmission in Fiber
`Before discussing optical components, it is essential to
`understand the characteristics of the optical fiber itself.
`Fiber is essentially a thin filament of glass that acts as
`a waveguide. A waveguide is a physical medium or path
`that allows the propagation of electromagnetic waves, such
`as light. Due to the physical phenomenon of total internal
`reflection, light can propagate the length of a fiber with little
`loss. Fig. 4 shows the cross section of the two types of fiber
`most commonly used: multimode and single mode. In order
`to understand the concept of a mode and to distinguish
`between these two types of fiber, a diversion into basic
`optics is needed.
`Light travels through vacuum at a speed of
`m/s. Light can also travel through any transparent material,
`but the speed of light will be slower in the material than
`in a vacuum. Let
`be the speed of light for a given
`material. The ratio of the speed of light in a vacuum to that
`in a material is known as the material’s refractive index ( )
`and is given by
`.
`When light travels from material of a given refractive
`index to material of a different refractive index (i.e., when
`
`1 Usable bandwidth, however, is limited by fiber nonlinearities (see
`Section II-E).
`
`BORELLA et al.: WDM LIGHTWAVE NETWORKS
`
`1275
`
`Petitioner Ciena Corp. et al.
`Exhibit 1032-2
`
`

`

`Fig. 2. Transmitter and receiver structures.
`
`Fig. 3. The low-attenuation regions of an optical fiber.
`
`refraction occurs), the angle at which the light is transmitted
`in the second material depends on the refractive indexes of
`the two materials as well as the angle at which light strikes
`the interface between the two materials. Due to Snell’s law,
`we have
`, where
`and
`are the
`refractive indexes of the first substance and the second
`is the angle of incidence, or
`substance, respectively;
`the angle with respect to normal that light hits the surface
`between the two materials; and
`is the angle of light in
`the second material. However, if
`and
`is greater
`than some critical value and the rays are reflected back into
`substance
`from its boundary with substance .
`Looking again at Fig. 4, we see that the fiber consists of
`a core completely surrounded by a cladding (both of which
`consist of glass of different refractive indexes). Let us first
`consider a step-index fiber, in which the change of refractive
`index at the core-cladding boundary is a step function. If the
`refractive index of the cladding is less than that of the core,
`then total internal reflection can occur in the core and light
`can propagate through the fiber (as shown in Fig. 5). The
`angle above which total internal reflection will take place
`is known as the critical angle and is given by
`, which
`corresponds to
`90 . From Snell’s law, we have
`
`The critical angle is then
`
`So, for total internal reflection, we require
`
`(1)
`
`In other words, for light to travel down a fiber, the light
`must be incident on the core-cladding surface at an angle
`greater than
`.
`In some cases, the fiber may have a graded index, in
`which the interface between the core and the cladding
`undergoes a gradual change in refractive index with
`(Fig. 6). A graded-index fiber reduces the minimum
`required for total internal reflection and also helps to
`reduce the intermodal dispersion in the fiber. Intermodal
`dispersion will be discussed in the following sections.
`For light to enter a fiber, the incoming light should be at
`an angle such that the refraction at the air-core boundary
`results in the transmitted light’s being at an angle for which
`total internal reflection can take place at the core-cladding
`boundary. As shown in Fig. 7, the maximum value of
`can be derived from
`
`From (1), since
`(2) as
`
`(2)
`
`, we can rewrite
`
`(3)
`
`is referred to as the numerical
`The quantity
`aperture of the fiber (NA) and
`is the maximum angle
`with respect to the normal at the air-core boundary, so that
`the incident light that enters the core will experience total
`internal reflection inside the fiber.
`
`B. Multimode Versus Single-Mode Fiber
`A mode in an optical fiber corresponds to one of possibly
`multiple ways in which a wave may propagate through
`the fiber. It can also be viewed as a standing wave in
`
`1276
`
`PROCEEDINGS OF THE IEEE, VOL. 85, NO. 8, AUGUST 1997
`
`Petitioner Ciena Corp. et al.
`Exhibit 1032-3
`
`

`

`Fig. 4. Multimode and single-mode optical fibers.
`
`(a)
`
`(b)
`
`Fig. 5. Light traveling via total internal reflection within a fiber.
`
`Fig. 6. Graded-index fiber.
`
`the transverse plane of the fiber. More formally, a mode
`corresponds to a solution of the wave equation that is
`derived from Maxwell’s equations and subject to boundary
`conditions imposed by the optical fiber waveguide.
`An electromagnetic wave propagating along an optical
`fiber consists of an electric field vector
`and a magnetic
`field vector
`. Each field can be broken down into three
`components. In the cylindrical coordinate system, these
`components are
`and
`, where
`is
`the component of the field that is normal to the wall (core-
`cladding boundary) of the fiber,
`is the component of
`the field that is tangential to the wall of the fiber, and
`is the component of the field that is in the direction of
`propagation. Fiber modes typically are referred to using
`the notation
`(if
`), or
`(if
`),
`where
`and
`are both integers. For the case
`, the
`modes are also referred to as transverse-electric (TE), in
`, or transverse-magnetic (TM), in which
`which case
`case
`.
`Although total internal reflection may occur for any angle
`that is greater than
`, light will not necessarily
`propagate for all of these angles. For some of these angles,
`light will not propagate due to destructive interference
`between the incident light and the reflected light at the
`core-cladding interface within the fiber. For other angles
`of incidence, the incident wave and the reflected wave at
`the core-cladding interface constructively interfere in order
`to maintain the propagation of the wave. The angles for
`which waves do propagate correspond to modes in a fiber.
`If more than one mode may propagate through a fiber, the
`fiber is called multimode. In general, a larger core diameter
`or high operating frequency allows a greater number of
`modes to propagate.
`The number of modes supported by a multimode optical
`fiber is related to the normalized frequency
`which is
`
`Fig. 7. Numerical aperture of a fiber.
`
`defined as
`
`(4)
`
`is the radius of the core, and
`,
`where
`is the wavelength of the propagating light
`in vacuum.
`In multimode fiber,
`the number of modes
`is given
`approximately by
`
`(5)
`
`The advantage of multimode fiber is that its core diameter
`is relatively large; as a result, injection of light into the
`fiber with low coupling loss2 can be accomplished by using
`inexpensive, large-area light sources, such as light-emitting
`diodes (LED’s).
`The disadvantage of multimode fiber is that it introduces
`the phenomenon of intermodal dispersion. In multimode
`fiber, each mode propagates at a different velocity due to
`different angles of incidence at the core-cladding boundary.
`This effect causes different rays of light from the same
`source to arrive at the other end of the fiber at different
`times, resulting in a pulse that is spread out in the time
`domain. Intermodal dispersion increases with the distance
`
`2 Coupling loss measures the power loss experienced when attempting
`to direct light into a fiber.
`
`BORELLA et al.: WDM LIGHTWAVE NETWORKS
`
`1277
`
`Petitioner Ciena Corp. et al.
`Exhibit 1032-4
`
`

`

`of propagation. The effect of intermodal dispersion may be
`reduced through the use of graded-index fiber, in which
`the region between the cladding and the core of the fiber
`consists of a series of gradual changes in the index of
`refraction (see Fig. 6). Even with graded-index multimode
`fiber, however, intermodal dispersion may still limit the bit
`rate of the transmitted signal and may limit the distance
`that the signal can travel.
`One way to limit intermodal dispersion is to reduce the
`number of modes. From (4) and (5), we observe that this
`reduction in the number of modes can be accomplished by
`reducing the core diameter, reducing the numerical aperture,
`or increasing the wavelength of the light.
`By reducing the fiber core to a sufficiently small diameter
`and reducing the numerical aperture, it is possible to capture
`only a single mode in the fiber. This single mode is the
`mode, also known as the fundamental mode. Single-
`mode fiber usually has a core size of about 10 m, while
`multimode fiber typically has a core size of 50–100 m
`(see Fig. 4). A step-index fiber will support a single mode
`if
`in (4) is less than 2.4048 [7].
`Thus, single-mode fiber eliminates intermodal dispersion
`and can hence support transmission over much longer dis-
`tances. However, it introduces the problem of concentrating
`enough power into a very small core. LED’s cannot couple
`enough light into a single-mode fiber to facilitate long-
`distance communications. Such a high concentration of
`light energy may be provided by a semiconductor laser,
`which can generate a narrow beam of light.
`
`C. Attenuation in Fiber
`Attenuation in optical fiber leads to a reduction of the
`signal power as the signal propagates over some distance.
`When determining the maximum distance that a signal
`can propagate for a given transmitter power and receiver
`sensitivity, one must consider attenuation. Let
`be
`km from the
`the power of the optical pulse at distance
`transmitter and
`be the attenuation constant of the fiber
`(in dB/km). Attenuation is characterized by [2]
`
`(6)
`
`where
`is the optical power at the transmitter. For a
`link length of
`km,
`must be greater than or equal
`to
`, the receiver sensitivity. From (6), we get
`
`(7)
`
`The maximum distance between the transmitter and the
`receiver (or the distance between amplifiers)3 depends more
`heavily on the constant
`than on the optical power
`launched by the transmitter. Referring back to Fig. 3, we
`note that the lowest attenuation occurs at approximately
`1550 nm.
`
`D. Dispersion in Fiber
`Dispersion is the widening of a pulse duration as it travels
`through a fiber. As a pulse widens, it can broaden enough to
`interfere with neighboring pulses (bits) on the fiber, leading
`to intersymbol interference. Dispersion thus limits the bit
`spacing and the maximum transmission rate on a fiber-optic
`channel.
`As mentioned earlier, one form of dispersion is inter-
`modal dispersion. This is caused when multiple modes of
`the same signal propagate at different velocities along the
`fiber. Intermodal dispersion does not occur in a single-mode
`fiber.
`Another form of dispersion is material or chromatic dis-
`persion. In a dispersive medium, the index of refraction is a
`function of the wavelength. Thus, if the transmitted signal
`consists of more than one wavelength, certain wavelengths
`will propagate faster than other wavelengths. Since no laser
`can create a signal consisting of an exact single wavelength,
`material dispersion will occur in most systems.4
`A third type of dispersion is waveguide dispersion. Wave-
`guide dispersion is caused because the propagation of
`different wavelengths depends on waveguide characteristics
`such as the indexes and shape of the fiber core and cladding.
`At 1300 nm, material dispersion in a conventional single-
`mode fiber is near zero. Luckily,
`this is also a low-
`attenuation window (although loss is lower at 1550 nm).
`Through advanced techniques such as dispersion shift-
`ing, fibers with zero dispersion at a wavelength between
`1300–1700 nm can be manufactured [8]. In a dispersion-
`shifted fiber, the core and cladding are designed such that
`the waveguide dispersion is negative with respect to the
`material dispersion,
`thus canceling the total dispersion.
`The dispersion will only be zero, however, for a single
`wavelength.
`
`E. Nonlinearities in Fiber
`Nonlinear effects in fiber may potentially have a signif-
`icant impact on the performance of WDM optical com-
`munications systems. Nonlinearities in fiber may lead to
`attenuation, distortion, and cross-channel interference. In a
`WDM system, these effects place constraints on the spacing
`between adjacent wavelength channels, limit the maximum
`power on any channel, and may also limit the maximum
`bit rate.
`the index of
`1) Nonlinear Refraction: In optical fiber,
`refraction depends on the optical intensity of signals prop-
`agating through the fiber [9]. Thus, the phase of the light
`at the receiver will depend on the phase of the light sent
`by the transmitter, the length of the fiber, and the optical
`intensity. Two types of nonlinear effects caused by this
`phenomenon are self-phase modulation (SPM) and cross-
`phase modulation (XPM).
`SPM is caused by variations in the power of an optical
`signal and results in variations in the phase of the signal.
`
`3 The amplifier sensitivity is usually equal to the receiver sensitivity,
`while the amplifier output is usually equal to optical power at a transmitter.
`
`4 Even if an unmodulated source consisted of a single wavelength, the
`process of modulation would cause a spread of wavelengths.
`
`1278
`
`PROCEEDINGS OF THE IEEE, VOL. 85, NO. 8, AUGUST 1997
`
`Petitioner Ciena Corp. et al.
`Exhibit 1032-5
`
`

`

`The amount of phase shift introduced by SPM is given by
`
`(8)
`
`where
`is the nonlinear coefficient for the index of
`refraction,
`,
`is the length of the fiber,
`and
`is the optical
`intensity. In phase-shift-keying
`(PSK) systems, SPM may lead to a degradation of the
`system performance since the receiver relies on the phase
`information. SPM also leads to the spectral broadening
`of pulses, as explained below. Instantaneous variations
`in a signal’s phase caused by changes in the signal’s
`intensity will result in instantaneous variations of frequency
`around the signal’s central frequency. For very short pulses,
`the additional frequency components generated by SPM
`combined with the effects of material dispersion will also
`lead to spreading or compression of the pulse in the time
`domain, affecting the maximum bit rate and the BER.
`XPM is a shift in the phase of a signal caused by the
`change in intensity of a signal propagating at a different
`wavelength. XPM can lead to asymmetric spectral broad-
`ening, and combined with SPM and dispersion may also
`affect the pulse shape in the time domain.
`Although XPM may limit the performance of fiber-optic
`systems, it may also have advantageous applications. XPM
`can be used to modulate a pump signal at one wavelength
`from a modulated signal on a different wavelength. Such
`techniques can be used in wavelength conversion devices
`and are discussed in Section VII.
`2) Stimulated Raman Scattering (SRS): SRS is caused by
`the interaction of light with molecular vibrations. Light
`incident on the molecules creates scattered light at a longer
`wavelength than that of the incident light. A portion of the
`light traveling at each frequency in a Raman-active fiber
`is downshifted across a region of lower frequencies. The
`light generated at the lower frequencies is called the Stokes
`wave. The range of frequencies occupied by the Stokes
`wave is determined by the Raman gain spectrum, which
`covers a range of around 40 THz below the frequency of the
`input light. In silica fiber, the Stokes wave has a maximum
`gain at a frequency of around 13.2 THz less than the input
`signal.
`The fraction of power transferred to the Stokes wave
`grows rapidly as the power of the input signal is increased.
`Under very high input power, SRS will cause almost all
`of the power in the input signal to be transferred to the
`Stokes wave.
`the channels of shorter
`In multiwavelength systems,
`wavelength will lose some power to each of the higher-
`wavelength channels within the Raman gain spectrum. To
`reduce the amount of loss, the power on each channel needs
`to be below a certain level. In [10], it is shown that in a
`ten-channel system with 10-nm channel spacing, the power
`on each channel should be kept below 3 mW to minimize
`the effects of SRS.
`3) Stimulated Brillouin Scattering (SBS): SBS is similar
`to SRS except that the frequency shift is cause by sound
`waves rather than molecular vibrations [9]. Other charac-
`teristics of SBS are that the Stokes wave propagates in the
`
`opposite direction of the input light, and SBS occurs at
`relatively low input powers for wide pulses (greater than 1
`s) but has negligible effect for short pulses (less than 10
`ns) [11]. The intensity of the scattered light is much greater
`in SBS than in SRS but the frequency range of SBS, on the
`order of 10 GHz, is much lower than that of SRS. Also, the
`gain bandwidth of SBS is only on the order of 100 MHz.
`To counter the effects of SBS, one must ensure that
`the input power is below a certain threshold. Also,
`in
`multiwavelength systems, SBS may induce cross talk be-
`tween channels. Cross talk will occur when two counter-
`propagating channels differ in frequency by the Brillouin
`shift, which is around 11 GHz for wavelengths at 1550 nm.
`The narrow gain bandwidth of SBS, however, makes SBS
`cross talk fairly easy to avoid.
`4) Four-Wave Mixing (FWM): FWM occurs when two
`wavelengths operating at frequencies
`and
`, respec-
`tively, mix to cause signals at
`and
`. These
`extra signals, called sidebands, can cause interference if
`they overlap with frequencies used for data transmission.
`Likewise, mixing can occur between combinations of three
`or more wavelengths. The effect of FWM in WDM systems
`can be reduced by using unequally spaced channels [12].
`FWM can be used to provide wavelength conversion, as
`will be shown in Section VII.
`5) Summary: Nonlinear effects in optical fibers may po-
`tentially limit the performance of WDM optical networks.
`Such nonlinearities may limit the optical power on each
`channel,
`limit
`the maximum number of channels,
`limit
`the maximum transmission rate, and constrain the spacing
`between different channels.
`It is shown that in a WDM system using channels spaced
`10 GHz apart and a transmitter power of 0.1 mW per
`channel, a maximum of about 100 channels can be obtained
`in the 1550-nm low-attenuation region [9].
`The details of optical nonlinearities are very complex
`and beyond the scope of this article. They are a major
`limiting factor in the available number channels in a WDM
`system, however, especially those operating over distances
`greater than 30 km [9]. The existence of these nonlinearities
`suggests that WDM protocols that limit the number of nodes
`to the number of channels do not scale well. For further
`details on fiber nonlinearities, the reader is referred to [11].
`
`F. Couplers
`A coupler is a general term that covers all devices that
`combine light into or split light out of a fiber. A splitter
`is a coupler that divides the optical signal on one fiber to
`two or more fibers. The most common splitter is a 1
`is
`2 splitter, as shown in Fig. 8(a). The splitting ratio
`the amount of power that goes to each output. For a two-
`port splitter, the most common splitting ratio is 50
`50,
`though splitters with any ratio can be manufactured [8].
`Combiners [see Fig. 8(b)] are the reverse of splitters, and
`when turned around, a combiner can be used as a splitter.
`An input signal to the combiner suffers a power loss of
`about 3 dB. A 2
`2 coupler [see Fig. 8(c)], in general, is
`a 2
`1 combiner followed immediately by a 1
`2 splitter,
`
`BORELLA et al.: WDM LIGHTWAVE NETWORKS
`
`1279
`
`Petitioner Ciena Corp. et al.
`Exhibit 1032-6
`
`

`

`Fig. 8. Splitter, combiner, and coupler.
`
`(a)
`
`(b)
`
`(c)
`
`Fig. 9. A 16  16 PSC.
`
`which has the effect of broadcasting the signals from two
`input fibers onto two output fibers. One implementation of a
`2
`2 coupler is the fused biconical tapered coupler, which
`basically consists of two fibers fused together. In addition
`to the 50
`50 power split incurred in a coupler, a signal
`also experiences return loss. If the signal enters an input
`of the coupler, roughly half of the signal’s power goes to
`each output of the coupler. However, a small amount of
`power is reflected in the opposite direction and is directed
`back to the inputs of the coupler. Typically, the amount of
`power returned by a coupler is 40–50 dB below the input
`power. Another type of loss is insertion loss. One source of
`insertion loss is the loss incurred when directing the light
`from a fiber into the coupler device; ideally, the axes of
`the fiber core and the coupler input port must be perfectly
`aligned, but full perfection may not be achievable due to
`the very small dimensions.
`The PSC is a multiport device in which light coming
`into any input port is broadcast to every output port. The
`PSC is attractive because the optical power that each output
`receives
`equals
`
`(9)
`
`is the optical power introduced into the star
`where
`by a single node and
`is the number of output ports of
`the star. Note that this expression ignores the excess loss,
`caused by flaws introduced in the manufacturing process,
`that
`the signal experiences when passing through each
`coupling element. One way to implement the PSC is to
`use a combination of splitters, combiners, and couplers as
`shown in Fig. 9. Another implementation of the star coupler
`is the integrated-optics planar star coupler, in which the star
`coupler and waveguides are fabricated on a semiconductor,
`glass (silica), or polymer substrate. A 19
`19 star coupler
`on silicon has been demonstrated with excess loss of around
`8
`3.5 dB at a wavelength of 1300 nm [13]. In [14], an 8
`star coupler with an excess loss of 1.6 dB at a wavelength
`of 1550 nm was demonstrated.
`
`III. OPTICAL TRANSMITTERS
`To understand how a tunable optical transmitter works,
`we must first understand some of the fundamental principles
`of lasers and how they work. Then we will discuss various
`implementations of tunable lasers and their properties.
`Good references on tunable laser technology include [1],
`[2], [15].
`
`A. How a Laser Works
`The word “laser” is an acronym for light amplification
`by stimulated emission of radiation. The key words are
`stimulated emission, which is what allows a laser to produce
`intense high-powered beams of coherent light (light that
`contains one or more distinct frequencies).
`To understand stimulated emission, we must first acquaint
`ourselves with the energy levels of atoms. Atoms that are
`stable (in the ground state) have electrons that are in the
`lowest possible energy levels. In each atom, there are a
`number of discrete levels of energy that an electron can
`have; thus, we refer to them as states. To change the level of
`an atom in the ground state, that atom must absorb energy.
`This energy can be in many forms but for our purposes
`here, it can be either light or electrical energy. When an
`atom absorbs energy, it becomes excited and moves to a
`higher energy level. At this point, the atom is unstable and
`usually moves quickly back to the ground state by releasing
`a photon, a particle of light.
`There are certain substances, however, whose states are
`quasistable, which means that the substances are likely to
`stay in the excited state for longer periods of time without
`constant excitation. By applying enough energy (in the
`form of either an optical pump or an electrical current)
`to a substance with quasi-stable states for a

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket