throbber
CO2 Solutions Inc.
`Exhibit 2009
`Akermin, Inc. v. CO2 Solutions Inc.
`IPR2015-00880
`Page 1 of 12
`
`

`
`
`
`T A J‘
`
`
`OPERATIONS
`
`Third Edition
`
`Robert E. Treybal
`The Late Professor of Chemical Engineering
`
`University of Rhode Island
`
`
`MCGRAW-HILL
`C LAS SIC
`TEXTB®K
`REIS s U
`'§l/I?‘-\ , ‘ //
`
`
`
`McGraw-Hill, Inc.
`New York St. Louis San Francisco Auckland Bogota
`Caracas Lisbon London Madrid Mexico City Milan
`Montreal New Delhi San Juan Singapore
`
`Page 2 of 12
`
`

`
`it
`
`
`
`-;,."*7.
`
`MASS-TRANSFER OPERATIONS
`
`Copyright © 1980, 1968, 1955 by McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc.
`Reissued 1987 by the McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc. All rights
`reserved. Printed inithe United States of America. Except as permitted
`under the United States Copyright Act of 1976, no part of this
`publication may be reproduced or distributed in any form or by any
`means, or stored in a data base or retrieval system, without the prior
`written permission of the publisher.
`
`ISBN D-D?-lJl:.5l?l=-U
`
`18192021 BKMBKM998765
`
`Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data
`
`Treybal, Robert Ewald, date
`Mass—transfer operations.
`
`(McGraw—I-Iill chemical engineering series)
`Includes bibliographical references and index.
`1. Chemical engineering.
`2. Mass transfer.
`I. Title.
`1980
`TP156.M3T7
`ISBN 0-07-065176—O _
`
`660.2’8422
`
`78-27876
`
`This book was set in Times Roman by Science Typographers, Inc.
`The editors were Julienne V. Brown and Madelaine Eichberg;
`the production supervisor was Charles Hess.
`New drawings were done by Santype Ltd.
`Arcata Graphics/
`
`Page 3 of 12
`
`

`
`this becomes less important when a chemical reaction eccurs, as in the
`[54],
`case or” the sulfur dioxide absorbers. Multistage countercurrent eifects can be
`obtained by using several venturis {3]. The device is also used for removing dust
`particles from gases [l2].
`
`ta’?
`
`WET'l”ED-JWALL TGWEES
`
`A thin film of liquid running down the inside of a vertical pipe, with gas flowing
`either cocurrently or countercurrently, constitutes a wetted-wall tower. Such
`devices have been used for theoretical studies of mass transfer, as described in
`Chap. 3, because the interfacial surface between the phases is readily kept under
`control and is measurable. industrially, they have been used as absorbersqfor
`hydrochloric acid, where absorption is accompanied by a very large evolution of
`heat [63].'ln this case the wetted-wall tower is surrounded with rapidly flowing
`cooling water. Multitube devices have also been used for distillation, where the
`liquid film is generated at the top by partial condensation of the rising vapor.
`Gas-pressure drop in these towers is probably lower than in any other gas-liquid
`contacting device, for a given set of operating conditions.
`
`SPRAY TOWERS AND SPRAY CHAMBERS
`
`The liquid can be sprayed into a gas stream by means of a nozzle which
`disperses the liquid into a‘ fine spray of drops. The flow may be countercurrent,
`as in vertical
`towers with the liquid sprayed downward, or parallel, as in
`horizontal spray chambers (see Chap. 7). These devices have the advantage of
`low pressure drop for the gas but also have a number of disadvantages. There is
`a relatively high pumping cost for the liquid, owing to the pressure drop through
`the spray nozzle. The tendency for entrainment of liquid by the gas leaving is
`considerable, and mist eliminators will almost always be necessary. Unless the
`diameter/length ratio is very small, the gas will be fairly thoroughly mixed by
`the spray and full advantage of countercurrent flow cannot be taken. Ordinarily,
`however, the diameter/length ratio cannot be made very small since then the
`spray would quickly reach the walls of the tower and become ineffective as a
`spray.
`
`PACKED TOWERS
`
`Packed towers, used for continuous contact of liquid and gas in both counter-
`current and cocurrent flow, are vertical columns which have been filled with
`packing or devices of large surface, as, in Fig. 6.27. The liquid is distributed over,
`and trickles down through, the packed bed, exposing a large surface to contact
`the gas.
`
`Page 4 of 12
`
`

`
`1% MASS-TRANSFER OPERATIONS
`
`AGas out
`
`Liquid distributor
`
`Packing resfrainer
`
`Shell
`
`Random packing
`
`i
`
`Liquid
`re-distributor
`
`Packing support
`
`-=e———Gos in
`
`—————> Liquid out
`
`Figure 6.27 Packed tower. '
`
`Page 5 of 12
`
`

`
`Paeking
`
`The tower packing, or fill, should offer the following characteristics:
`
`1. Provide for large interfacial surface between liquid and gas. The surface of
`the packing per unit volume of packed space ap should be large but not in a
`microscopic sense. Lumps of coke, for example, have a large surface thanks
`to their porous structure, but most of this would be covered by the trickling
`film of liquid. The specific packing surfaceap in any event is almost always
`larger than the interfacial liquid-gas surface.
`T
`2. Possess desirable fluid-flow characteristics. This ordinarily means that the
`fractional void volume 5, or fraction of empty space, in the packed bed
`should be large. The packing must permit passage of large volumes of fluid
`through small tower cross sections without loading or flooding (see below)
`and with low pressure drop for the A gas. Furthermore, gas-pressure drop
`should be largely the result of skin friction if possible, since this ismore
`effective than form drag in promoting high values of the mass-transfer
`coefficients (see Wetted-wall towers).
`. Be chemically inert to fluids being processed.
`. Have structural strength to permit easy handling and installation.
`. Represent low cost.
`
`Lhuhb)
`
`Packings are of two major types, random and regular.
`
`Random Packings V
`Random packings are simply dumped into the tower during installation and
`allowed to fall at random. In the past such readily available materials as broken
`stone, gravel, or lumps of coke were used, but although inexpensive, they are not
`desirable for reasons of small surface and poor fluid-flow characteristics. Ran-
`dom packings most frequently used at present are manufactured, and -the A
`common types are shown in Fig. 6.28. Raschig rings are hollow cylinders, as
`shown, of diameters ranging from 6 to l()() m (;’,- to 4 in) or more. They may be
`made of chemical stoneware orporcelain, which are useful in Contact with most
`liquids except alkalies and hydrofluoric acid; of carbon, which is useful except
`in strongly oxidizing atmospheres; of metals; or of plastics. Plastics must be
`especially carefully chosen, since they may deteriorate rapidly with certain
`organic solvents and with oxygen-bearing gases at only slightly elevated temper-
`atures. Thin-walled metal and plastic packings offer the advantage of lightness
`in weight, but in setting floor—loading limits it should be anticipated that the
`tower may inadvertently fill with liquid. Lessing rings and others with internal
`partitions are less frequently used.-The saddle-shaped packings, lBerl andlntalox
`saddles, and variants of them, are available in sizes from 6 to 75 m G to 3 in),
`made of chemical stoneware or plastic. Pall iings, also known as Flexirings,
`Cascade rings, and as a variant, Hy-Pak, are available in metal and plastic.
`
`Page 6 of 12
`
`

`
`199 MASS-TRANSFER OPERATIONS
`
`
`
`A
`
`(£7)
`
`(b)
`
`‘
`
`V
`
`(f)
`
`Figure 6.28 Some random tower packings: (a) Raschig rings, (b) Lessing ring, (c) partition ring, (d)
`Berl saddle (courtesy of Maurice A. Knight), (e) Intalox saddle (Chemical Processing Products Division,
`Norton Co.), (j) Tellerette (Ceilcote Conypany, Inc.), and (g) pall ring (Chemical Processing Products
`Division, Norton ‘Co.).
`A
`'
`
`of plastic. Generally the random packings offer larger specific surface (and
`larger gas-pressure drop) in the smaller sizes, but they cost less per unit volume
`in the larger sizes. As a rough guide, packing sizes of 25 mm or larger are
`ordinarily used for gas rates of 0.25 m3/s (w 500 ft3/min), 50 mm or larger for
`gas rates of l m3/s (2000 ft3/min). During installation the packings are poured
`into the tower to fall at random, and in order to prevent breakage of ceramic or
`carbon paekings, the tower may first be filled with water to reduce the velocity
`of fall.
`’
`
`Regular Packings
`
`These are of great variety. The counterflow trays already considered are a form
`of regularpaclcing, as are the arrangements of Fig. 6.29. The regular packings
`offer the advantages of low pressure drop for the gas and greater possible fluid
`flow rates, usually at
`the expense of more costly installation than random
`packing. Stacked Raschig rings are economically practical only in very large
`sizes. There are several modifications of the expanded metal packings [105].
`Wood grids, or hurdles, are inexpensive and frequently used where large void
`volumes are required, as with tar-bearing gases from coke ovens or liquids
`carrying suspended solid particles. Knitted or otherwise woven wire screen,
`rolled as a fabric into cylinders (Nee-Kloss) or other metal gauzelike arrange-
`ments (Koch-Sulzer, Hyperfil, and Goodloe packings) provide a large interfacial
`surface of contacted liquid and gas and a very low gas-pressure drop, especially
`useful for vacuum distillation [10, 77]. Static mixers were originally designed as
`
`Page 7 of 12
`
`

`
`
`
`(c)
`
`.
`
`.
`
`(d).
`
`.
`
`Figure 6.29 Regular, or stacked, packings: (a) Raschig rings, stacked staggered (top view), (b)
`double spiral ring (Chemical Processing Products Division, Norton Co.),
`(c) section through
`expanded-metal-lath packing, (d) wood grids.
`
`but in general they consist of metal eggcratelike devices installed in a pipe to
`cause a multitude of splits of cocurrently flowing fluids into left- and right-hand
`streams, breaking each stream down into increasingly smaller streams [85].
`These devices have been shown to be useful for countercurrent gas-liquid
`contact [I21], with good mass-transfer characteristics at low gas-pressure drop.
`
`Tower Shells
`These may be of wood, metal, chemical stoneware, acidproof brick, glass,
`plastic, plastic- or glass—lined metal, or other material depending upon the
`corrosion conditions. For ease of’ construction and strength they are usually
`circular in cross section.
`
`Packing Supports
`
`An open space at the bottom of the tower is necessary for ensuring good
`distribution of the gas into the packing. Consequently the packing must be
`supported above the open space. The support must, of course, be sufficiently
`strong to carry the weight of a reasonable height of packing, and it must have
`ample free area to allow for flow of liquid and gas with a minimum of
`restriction. A bar grid, of the sort shown in Fig. 6.27, can be used [112], but
`specially designed supports which provide separate passageways for gas and
`liquid are preferred. Figure 6.30 shows one variety, whose free area for flow is of
`the order of 85 percent and which can be made in various modifications and of
`
`Page 8 of 12
`
`

`
`192 MASS-TRANSFER OPERATIONS
`
`
`
`Figure 6.30 Multibeam support plate. (Chemical Process Products Division, Norton Co.)
`
`many different materials including metals, expanded metals, ceramics, and
`plastics.
`’
`
`Liquid Distribution
`
`The importance of adequate initial distribution of theliquid at the top of the
`packing is indicated in Fig. 6.31. Dry packing is of course completely ineffective
`for mass transfer, and various devices are used for liquid distribution. Spray
`nozzles generally result in too much entrainment of liquid in the gas to be useful.
`The arrangement shown in Fig. 6.27 or a ring of perforated pipe can be used in
`small towers. For large diameters, a distributor of the type shown in Fig. 6.32
`can be used, and many other arrangements are available. It is generally consid-
`ered necessary to provide at least five points of introduction of liquid for each
`0.1 m2 (1 ftz) of tower cross section for large towers (d > 1.2 In = 4 ft) and a
`greater number for smaller diameters.
`‘
`'
`
`Random Packing Size and Liquid Redistribution
`
`In the case of random packings, the packing density, i.e., the number of packing
`. pieces per unit volume, is ordinarily less in the immediate vicinity of the tower
`
`
`\
`O
`w‘
`.
`,4‘
`O$¥‘,9.
`
`
`
`9:!/9 V»,9
`3:
`
`
`3 99
`3°30figQfifi
`OOz»:0..Q...q9o’a9p
`§-9
`
`
`.9.0
`Q999
`9
`
`
`
`
`
`9993
`9459i&%pg$9'3':99
`
`
`
`
`
`‘Vo:%»%%>%%»‘%‘9
`’
`'
`i
`9
`’*‘
`I'”99”ed
`*§‘3°3':°3‘3°3°3°3°3°3'3:E
`9°3°:°3°3*3°3°1°3'3°‘e‘1
`
`
`
`
`
`
`fiflfifififififififififi
`4wv%%fifl%&®%% pocmng
`
`
`’9°9999999999_j F
`99994;
`
`
`9.03.0.9,
`9,9,9,9.9,9,9,9,9,9.9:V
`igure
`
`
`d
`-
`'d di t ‘b
`531 r‘
`-1qu1
`s 11 ution an pac
`
`'
`kin ‘
`g irriga
`
`_
`
`93 .
`
`O
`
`
`
`O
`
`V97UV'V‘V‘§,fifi@fifififig%PVfi&fi&%%%%qgggggggQ99999999‘33°3'3°3'3°39gfifipgg§w'999999999999%%%%%4599999<9909O_9,.999,,9V‘Io’‘o'4
`
`
`
`Page 9 of 12
`
`

`
`35%
`
`
`
`Figure 6.32 Weir-trough liquid distributor. (Chemicals Process Products Division, Norton Co.)
`
`walls, and this leads to a tendency of the liquid to segregate toward the walls
`and the gas to flow
`the center of the tower (channeling). This tendency is
`much less pronounced when the diameter of the individual packing pieces is
`smaller than at least one-eighth the tower diameter, but it is recommended that,
`if possible,
`the ratio c{,/ T = 1 : 15. Even so it is customary to provide for
`redistribution of the liquid at intervals varying from 3 to .10 times the tower
`diameter, but at least every 6 or 7 m. Knitted mesh packings placed under a
`packing support (Fig. 6.30) make good redistributors [41]. With proper attention
`to liquid distribution, packed towers are successfully built to diameters of 6 or
`'7 m or more.
`
`Packing Restrainers
`
`These are necessary when gas velocities are high, and they are generally
`desirable to guard against lifting of packing during a sudden gas surge. Heavy
`screens or bars may be used. For heavy ceramic packing, heavy bar plates
`resting freely on the top of the packing may be used. For plastics and other
`lightweight packings, the restrainer is attached to the tower shell.
`
`Entrainment Eliminators
`
`Especially at high gas velocities, the gas leaving the top of the packing may carry
`off droplets of liquid as a mist. This can be removed by mist eliminators,
`through which the ‘gas, must pass, installed above the liquid inlet. A layer of
`mesh (of wire, Teflon, polyethylene, or other material) especially knitted with 98
`to 99 percent voids, roughly 1% mm thick, will collect virtually all mist particles
`[18, 124]. Other
`types of elirninators include cyclones and venetian-blind
`arrangements [53]. A meter of dry random packing is very effective.
`
`Page 10 of 12
`
`

`
`194 MASS-TRANSFER OPERATIONS
`
`
`
`logAP/Z,pressuredrop/height
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`log 6,’ superficial gas mass velocity
`
`Figure 6.33 Typical gas pressure
`drop for counterflow of liquid and
`gas in random packings.
`
`Countercurrent Flow of Liquid and Gas through Packing
`
`For most random packings, the pressure drop suffered by the gas is influenced
`by the gas and liquid flow rates in a manner similar to that shown in Fig. 6.33.
`The slope of the line for dry packing is usually in the range 1.8 to 2.0, indicating
`turbulent flow for most practical gas velocities.
`At a fixed gas velocity, the gas—pressure drop increases with increased liquid
`rate, principally becauseof the reduced free cross section available for flow of
`gas resulting from the presence of the liquid. In the region of Fig. 6.33 below A,
`‘the liquid holdup,
`i.e., the quantity of liquid contained in the packed bed, is
`reasonably constant with changing gas velocity, although it increases with liquid
`rate. In the region between A and B, the liquid holdup increases rapidly with gas
`rate, the free area for gas flow becomes smaller, and ‘the pressure drop rises more
`rapidly. This is known as loading. As the gas rate is increased to B at fixed liquid
`rate, one of a number of changes occurs: (1) a layer of liquid, through which the
`gas bubbles, may appear at the top of the packing;_(2) liquid may fill the tower,
`starting at the bottom or at any intermediate restriction suchas a packing
`support, so that there is a change from gas—continuous liquid—dispersed to
`liquidwcontinuous gas—dispersed (inversion); or (3) slugs of team may rise
`rapidly upward through the packing. At the same time, entrainment of liquid by
`the effluent gas increases rapidly, and the tower is flooded. The gas pressure drop
`then increases very rapidly. The change in conditions in the region A to B of
`Fig. 6.33 is gradual, and initial loading and flooding are frequently determined
`by the change in slope of the pressure-drop curves rather than through any
`visible effect. it is not practical to operate a tower in a flooded condition; most
`towers operate just helow, or in the lower part of, the loading region.
`
`Page 11 of 12
`
`

`
`0.4
`
`0.2
`
`0.10
`0.08
`0.06
`
`0.04
`
`0.02
`
`0.01
`0.008
`0.006
`0.004
`
`0.002
`0.001
`
`5 ,1?
`‘L <5
`3,1
`I
`L5
`0
`UT >4
`2' S
`
`o.
`
`FOR GAS=-LZQUED —f)PERAZ"lCBNS
`
`H1 (.511
`
`—r

`§§L’“‘-
`l200
`800
`400
`
`.
`
`we
`
`3
`
`V
`Approximate
`/ flooding
`\
`9
`
`‘
`I
`l
`I
`1 9211 1b1‘f/tl‘l2:6.37 x 10-3 51$?
`infll 0 _
`_3 N/m2
`gt
`-1.224 X 10
`-2?-
`
`\ V
`\
`
`1
`
`
`
`0.01
`
`0.02
`
`0.04
`
`0.1
`
`0.2
`
`0.4
`
`1.0
`
`A PC )1/2
`
`P1, “P0
`
`G’
`
`r
`
`-
`
`\
`AX
`
`l’
`
`V);
`
`F
`
`~
`
`I
`
`.
`
`/
`
`'
`
`J
`
`T
`
`l
`
`_.__l____
`
`2
`
`4
`
`10
`
`Figure 6.34 Flooding and pressure drop in random—packed towers. For SI units gc = 1, Cf from
`Table 6.3, and use J = 1. For G’ = lb/ft2- h, p = lb/ft3, 11,; = cP, gc = 4.18 X 108, Cf from Table
`6.3, and use J = 1.502. [Coordinatesof Eckert [38], Chemical Process Products Division, Norton Co.)
`
`Flooding and Loading
`
`Flooding conditions in random packings depend upon the method of packing
`(wet or dry) and settling of the packing [76]. The upper curve of Fig. 6.34
`correlates the flooding data for most random packings reasonably well. More
`specific data are in the handbooks [47] or are available from the manufacturers.
`The limit of loading cannot readily be correlated.
`Typically, absorbers and strippers are designed for gas-pressure drops of 200
`to 400 N /m2 per meter of packed depth (0.25 to 0.5 inH2O/ft), atmospheric-
`pressure fractionators from 400 to 600 (N/m2)/m, and vacuum stills for 8 to 40
`(N /m2)/In (0.01 to 0.05 inl-I20/ft) [38]. Values of C] which characterize the
`packings are given in Table 6.3 (these and other values in Table 6.3 change with
`changes in manufacturing procedures, so that the manufacturers should be
`consulted before completing final designs). Flooding velocities for regular or
`stacked, packings will generally be considerably greater
`than for
`random
`packing.
`
`Page 12 of 12

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket