`
`Subst. for form 1449/PTO
`
`
`
`
`INFORMATION DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
`BY APPLICANT
`(Use as many sheets as necessary)
`
`Application Number
`
`
` First Named Inventor
`A" Unit
`Examiner Name
`
`33342755 ~ GAL): 2453
`Complete if Known
`13/342,795
`
`Vlctor Larson
`
`‘15—
`Krlsna Lim
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`- D450
`- D451
`- D452
`
`Exhibit 137, Schulzrinne' vs. Claims of the ‘135 Patent2
`Exhibit 138, Schulzrinne1 vs. Claims of the ‘151 Patent2
`Exhibit 139 Schulznnne vs. Claims of the '180 Patent2
`
`-
`
`1
`
`.
`
`.
`
`- D472
`- D473
`
`
`D475
`
`D474
`
`Exhibit159 MarIno vs Claims of the ‘504 Patent2
`Exhibit160, Marino vs Claims of the ‘759 Patent2
`
`,
`
`.
`
`Exhibit 161. Aziz (“646)1 vs. Claims of the ‘759 Patent2
`
`Exhibit 162, Wesinger1 vs. Claims of the ‘135 Patent2
`
`
`
`ALL REFERENCES CONSiDERED EXCEPT WHERE LiNED THRQUGH.
`
`/K.L./
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. - Exhibit 1051, p. 751
`
`
`
`
`
`
`_-_--
`
`
`
`
`__-
`
`_
`
`1 1
`
`Exhibit 149, Atkinson vs. Claims of the ‘135 Patent2
`
`D463
`
`Exhibit 150, Atkinson vs. Claims of the ‘151 Patent2
`
`D464
`
`Exhibit 151, Atkinson vs. Claims of the 180 Patent2
`
`-
`1
`Exhibit 152 Atkmson‘vs Claims of the ‘211 Patent2
`1
`l
`
`1____
`
`-m
`-
`-
`- D465
`-
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. - Exhibit 1051, p. 751
`
`

`

`Subst. for form 1449/PTO
`
`
`
`
`INFORMATION DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`BY APPLICANT
`(Use as many sheets as necessary)
`
`33342795 ~ GAL): 2453
`Complete if Known
`Application Number
`13l342,795
`Filingoate “m1:—
`First Named lnventor
`Victor Larson
`
`mm “
`ExaminerName
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`-— Docket Number
`
`D476
`
`Exhibit 163 Wesmger1 vs Claims of the ‘151 Patent2
`
`77580-155(VRNK-1CP3CNFT5)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1 1 1 1
`
`Exhibit 164 Wesmger vs. Claims of the ‘180 Patent2
`
`Exhibit 165 Wesmger vs. Claims of the ‘211 Patent2
`
`Exhibit 166 Wesmger vs. Claims of the ‘504 Patent2
`
`D480
`
`Exhibit 167 Wesmger vs. Claims of the ‘759 Patent2
`
`1 1 1 1
`
`Exhibit 168,Aziz (‘234) vs. Claims of the 135 Patent2
`
`Exhibit 169 Azuz(234) vs Claims ofthe‘151 Patent2
`
`Exhibit 170 A212 (234) vs Claims ofthe ‘180 Patent2
`
`D477
`
`D478
`
`D479
`
`D481
`
`D482
`
`D483
`
`
`
`
`D484
`
`Exhibit 171. Aziz (‘234) vs. Claims of the ‘211 Patent2
`
`D490
`
`D491
`
`D492
`
`D493
`
`u
`1
`-
`-
`Exhibit177,Va|enc1a vs Claims of the 180 Patent2
`-
`1
`Exhibit178,Va|enCIa vs Claims of the ‘211 Patent2
`-
`1
`Exhibit 179,Valencna vs Claims of the ‘504 Patent2
`
`Exhibit 180, RFC 2401 in Combination with US. Patent No. 6,496,8671 vs. Claims of the ‘180
`Patent2
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`ALL REFERENCES CONSiDERED EXCEPT WHERE LiNED THRQUGH.
`
`/K.L./
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. - Exhibit 1051, p. 752
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. - Exhibit 1051, p. 752
`
`

`

`
`
`Subst. for form 1449/PTO
`
`33342795 ~ GAU: 2453
`Complete if Known
`
`
`INFORMATION DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
`BY APPLICANT
`
`(Use as many sheets as necessary)
`
`
`
`
`A r
`t.
`N
`b
`”“6”" ”m 9'
`Filing Date
`First Named Inventor
`
`Art Unit
`
`Examiner Name
`
`13/342,795
`
`Victor Larson
`
`Krisna Lim
`
`77580-155(VRNK-1CP3CNFT5)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`D502
`
`Exhibit 189, AutoSOCKS v2.1 Administrator’s Guide1 vs. Claims of the ‘180 Patent2
`
`D503
`
`Exhibit 190, AutoSOCKS‘ vs. Claims of the '759 Patent2
`
`m Exhibit 191, Aventail Connect 3.01/2.511 vs. Claims of the ‘135 Patent2
`
`D505
`
`Exhibit 192, Aventail Connect v3.01/2.511vs. Claims of the ‘151 Patent2
`
`D506
`
`Exhibit 193, Aventail Connect 3.01/2.511 vs. Claims of the ‘180 Patent2
`
`D507
`
`Exhibit 194, Aventail Connect 3.01/2.511 vs. Claims of the ‘759 Patent2
`
`D508
`
`Exhibit 195, Aventail Connect 3.1/2.6 Administrator's Guide1 vs. Claims of the ‘135 Patent2 D509
`
`Exhibit 196, Aventail Connect 3.1/2.6 Administrator's Guide1 vs. Claims of the ‘151 Patent2
`
`D510
`
`Exhibit 197, Aventail Connect 31/261 vs. Claims of the ‘180 Patent2
`
`0511
`
`Exhibit 198, Aventail Connect 31/261 vs. Claims of the ‘759 Patent2
`
`D512
`
`Exhibit2199, BinGO! User’s User's Guide/Extended Features Reference1 vs. Claims of the ‘151
`Patent
`.
`
`D513
`
`Exhibit2200, BinGO! User's User's Guide/Extended Features Reference1 vs. Claims of the ‘135
`Patent
`
`D514
`
`Exhibit 201, BinGO! vs. Claims of the ‘180 Patent2
`
`D515
`
`Exhibit 202, BinGO! vs. Claims of the ‘759 Patent2
`
`D516
`
`Exhibit 203, Broadband Forum Technical Report TR-025 (issue 1.0/5.0)1 vs. Claims of the ‘135
`P
`atent2
`
`D517
`
`Exhibit 204, Domain Name System (DNS) Security1 vs. Claims of the ‘211 Patent2
`
`0513
`
`Exhibit 205, Domain Name System (DNS) Security‘ vs. Claims of the '504 Patent2
`
`D519
`
`Exhibit 206, RFC 2230, Key Exchange Delegation Record for the DNS1 vs. Claims of the ‘211
`Patent2
`
`D520
`
`“um
`
`xhibit2207, RFC 2230, Key Exchange Delegation Record for the DNS1 vs. Claims of the ‘504
`atent
`
`D521
`
`Exhibit 208t,2 RFC 2538, Storing Certificates in the Domain Name System (DNS)1 vs. Claims of the
`'211 Paten
`
`D522
`
`Exhibit 209t,2RFC 2538, Storing Certificates in the Domain Name System (DNS)1 vs. Claims of the
`‘504 Paten
`
`D523
`
`
`
`Exhibit 210, IETF RFC 2065: Domain Name System Security Extensions; Published January 19971
`vs. Claims of the ‘504 Patent2
`
`
`
`
`
`ALL REFERENCES CONSiDERED EXCEPT WHERE LiNED THRQUGH.
`
`/K.L./
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. - Exhibit 1051, p. 753
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. - Exhibit 1051, p. 753
`
`

`

`First Named Inventor
`
`Victor Larson
`
`0524
`
`D525
`
`Exhibit 212, RFC 2486, RFC 2661, RFC 2401, and Internet-Draft, "Secure Remote Access with
`L2TP"1 vs. Claims of the ‘135 Patent2
`
`0526
`
`Exhibit 213, U.S. Patent No. 7,100,195 in Combination with RFC 2401 and U.S. Patent No.
`6,496,8671 vs. Claims of the '135 Patent2
`
`0527
`
`Exhibit 214, U.S. Patent No. 7,100,195 in Combination with RFC 2401 and U.S. Patent No.
`6,496,867' vs. Claims of the ‘151 Patent2
`
`
`
`
`
`‘
`
`- 0528
`
`Exhibit 215, U.S. Patent No. 6,643,7011 vs. Claims of the ‘135 Patent2
`
`D529
`
`Exhibit 216, U.S. Patent No. 6,643,701 ‘ vs. Claims of the ‘151 Patent2
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`$342735 ~ GAL): 2453
`Subst. for form 1449/PTO
`
`
`Complete if Known
`13/342,795
`Application Number
`
`
`INFORMATION DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
`
`
`BY APPLICANT
`
`
`
`(Use as many sheets as necessary)
`
`Krisna Lim
`
`
`
`Docket Number
`77580-155(VRNK-1CP3CNFT5)
`
`
`
`
`Exhibit 211, lETF RFC 2065: Domain Name System Security Extensions; Published January 19971
`vs. Claims of the '211 Patent2
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`0530
`
`ExhibittZZ17, U.S. Patent No. 6,496,867 in Combination with RFC 24011 vs. Claims of the ‘151
`Paten
`
`U10) _n
`
`Exhibitt2218, U.S. Patent No. 6,496,867 in Combination with RFC 24011 vs. Claims of the '135
`Paten
`
`
`
`D532
`
`Exhibit 219, U.S. Patent No. 6,496,8671 vs. Claims of the ‘211 Patent2
`
`0533
`
`Exhibit 22o, U.S. Patent No. 6,496,867' vs. Claims of the '504 Patentz
`
`D534
`
`Exhibit 221, RFC 2486, RFC 2661, RFC 2401, and Internet-Draft, “Secure Remote Access with
`L2TP"1 vs. Claims of the '151 Patent2
`
`D535
`
`Exhibit 222, U.S. Patent No. 6,557,0371 vs. Claims of the ‘211 Patent2
`
`0536
`
`Exhibit 223, U.S. Patent No. 6,557,0371 vs. Claims of the ‘504 Patent2
`
`0537
`
`Exhibit 224, RFC 2230, Key Exchange Delegation Record for the DNS1 vs. Claims of the ‘135
`Patent2
`
`D538
`- D539
`- 0540
`
`
`
`
`- 0542
`
`- 0543
`
`- 0544
`0545
`-
`
`Patent
`
`Exhibit2225, RFC 2230, Key Exchange Delegation Recordforthe DNS1 vs. Claims ofthe '151 -
`Exhibit Cisco-1, Cisco’s Prior Art Systems1 vs. Claims of the '135 Patent
`Exhibit Cisco-2, Cisco’s Prior Art Systems1 vs. Claims of the ‘1 51 Patent
`
`Exhibit Cisco—4, Cisco's Prior Art Systems1 vs. Claims of the ‘211 Patent
`Exhibit Cisco-5, Cisco’s Prior Alt Systems1 vs. Claims of the ‘504 Patent
`Exhibit Cisco-6, Cisco's Prior Alt Systems1 vs. Claims of the ‘759 Patent
`
`Exhibit Cisco-7, Cisco's Prior Alt PIX System1 vs. Claims of the ‘759 Patent
`
`-
`-
`-
`
`-
`
`
`
`ALL REFERENCES CONSiDEREE‘: EXCEPT WHERE LiNED THRQUGH.
`
`/K.L./
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. - Exhibit 1051, p. 754
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. - Exhibit 1051, p. 754
`
`

`

`BY APPLICANT
`(Use as many sheets as necessary)
`
`Applicatiowmb
`
`$342795 ~ GAL): 2453
`
`
`
`
`-- Exhibit A: Copy ofU.S. Patent No. 6,502,135
`- 0547
`Exhibit A: Copy ofU.S. Patent No. 7,490,151
`
`-
`-
`
`0548
`
`Exhibit 8: Certificate of Service to Request For Inter Partes Reexamination Under 35 U.S.C. § 311
`(Patent No. 6,502,135)
`
`Exhibit B: Certificate of Service to Request For Inter Partes Reexamination Under 35 U.S.C. § 311
`(Patent No. 7,490,151)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Subst. for form 1449IPTO
`
`
`INFORMATION DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`AM u
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`--—-
`--—-
`-_-
`--—
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Exhibit 02: Claim Chart Aventail Autosocks (Patent No. 7,490,151)
`
`D558
`
`Exhibit C3: Claim Chart Aventail AutoSOCKS (Patent No. 6,502,135)
`
`0559
`
`Exhibit C3 Claim Chart BinGO (Patent No. 7,490 151)
`
`0560
`
`Exhibit 0-3: Provisional Application 60/137,704
`
`0561
`
`Exhibit C4: Claim Chart Wang (Patent No 6 502 135)
`
`0562
`
`ExhibitC4 Claim Chart Beser(Patent No 7,490,151)
`
`D563
`
`Exhibit C5: Claim Chart Beser (Patent No 6502135)
`
`Exhibit 05: Claim Chart Wang (Patent No. 7,490,151)
`
`0565
`
`Exhibit C6: Claim Chart BinGO (Patent No. 6,502,135)
`
`0566
`
`Exhibit D. Memorandum Opinion in VirnetX v. Microsoft.
`
`0567
`
`D568
`
`0569
`
`
`
`Exhibit D-1: Takahiro Kiuchi and Shigekoto Kaihara, “C-HTTP — The Development of a Secure,
`Closed HPPT-Based Network on the Internet," Published in the Proceedings of SNDSS 1996.
`
`
`
` Exhibit D-10: D.E. Denning and GM. Sacco, “Time-stamps in Key Distribution Protocols,"
`
`Communications of the ACM, Vol. 24, N8, pp. 533-536. August 1981.
`
`
`Exhibit D-11: C.l. Dalton and J.F. Griffin, "Applying Military Grade Security to the lntemet,”
`
`Proceedings of the 8th Joint European Networking Conference (JENC 8), (May 12-15 1997).
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`ALL REFERENCES CONSIDERED EXCEPT WHERE LiNED THROUGH.
`
`/K.L./
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. - Exhibit 1051, p. 755
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. - Exhibit 1051, p. 755
`
`

`

`13342795 ~ GAU: 2453
`Subst. for form 1449/PTO
`Complete if Known
`Application Number
`
`INFORMATION DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
`
`BY APPLICANT
`(Use as many sheets as necessary)
`
`
`
`Filing Date
`First Named Inventor
`
`Art Unit
`
`Examiner Name
`
`Docket Number
`
`VIOtOI’ Larson
`
`Krisna Lim
`
`D570
`
`
`Exhibit D-12: Steven M. Bellovin and Michael Merritt, "Encrypted Key Exchange: Password-Based
`
`protocols Secure against Dictionary Attacks," 1992 |EEE Symposium on Security and Privacy
`
`(1992).
`
`
`
`
`13/342,795
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`- 0571
`
`Exhibit D-2: Copy ofU.S. Pat. No. 5,898,830
`
`D572
`
`
`
`
`Exhibit D—3: Eduardo Solana and JiJrgen Harms, "Flexible Internet Secure Transactions Based on
`
`Collaborative Domains,", Security Protocols Workshop 1997, pp. 37-51.
`
`
`9573
`
`Exhibit D-4: Copy ofU.S. Pat. No. 6,119,234
`
`D574
`
`Exhibit D-5: Jeff Sedayao, “’Mosaic Will Kill My Network!’ — Studying Network Traffic Patterns of
`Mosaic Use,” in Electron. Proc. 2nd World Wide Web Conf.’94: Mosaic and the Web, Chicago, IL,
`Oct. 1994.
`
`D576
`
`D575
`
`Exhibit D-6: M. Luby Juels and R. Ostrovsky, “Security of Blind Digital Signatures,” Crypto '97,
`LNCS 1294, pages 150-164, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1997.
`
`Exhibit D-8: David M. Martin, “A Framework for Local Anonymity in the Internet," Technical Report.
`Boston University, Boston, MA, USA (Feb 21, 1998).
`
`D577
`
`Exhibit D-9: Copy of US. Pat. No. 7,764,231
`
`D578
`
`Exhibit E-1: Claim Charts Applying Kiuchi and Other References to Claims of the ‘135 Patent.
`
`D579
`
`Exhibit E1: Declaration of Chris Hopen (Patent No. 6,502,135)
`
`D580
`
`Exhibit E1: Declaration of Chris Hopen (Patent No. 7,490,151)
`
`D581
`
`Exhibit E-2: Claim Charts Applying Wesinger and Other References to Claims of the ‘135 Patent.
`
`D582
`
`Exhibit E2: Declaration of Michael Fratto (Patent No.6,502,135)
`
`D583
`
`Exhibit E2: Declaration of Michael Fratto (Patent No. 7,490,151)
`
`D584
`
`Exhibit E-3: Claim Charts Applying Solana and Other References to Claims of the ‘135 Patent.
`
`D585
`
`Exhibit E3: Declaration of James Chester (Patent No. 6,502,135)
`
`D586
`
`Exhibit E3: Declaration of James Chester (Patent No. 7,490,151)
`
`D587
`
`Exhibit E-4: Claim Charts Applying Aziz and Other References to Claims of the ‘135 Patent.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`-- Exhibit x1: Aventail Connect Administrator’s Guide v3.1/v2.6., PP 1-20 (1996-1999)
`-- Exhibit x10: Copy ofU.S. Patent No. 4,885,778
`-m Exhibit x11: Copy ofU.S. Patent No. 6,615,357
`-- Exhibit x2: Aventail Connect Administrator’s Guide v3.01/v2.51., PP 1-116 (1996-1999)
`- 9592
`Exhibit x3: Aventail AutoSOCKS Administration & User's Guide v2.1 ., PP 1-70 (1996-1999)
`-
`
`
`
`Exhibit X4: Reed et al., ”Proxies for Anonymous Routine," 12th Annuary Computer Security
`Applications Conference, San Diego, CA, December -9-13, pp 1-10 (1996).
`
`
`
`
`
`ALL REFERENCES CONSiDERED EXCEPT WHERE LiNED THRQUGH.
`
`/K.L./
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. - Exhibit 1051, p. 756
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. - Exhibit 1051, p. 756
`
`

`

`INFORMATION DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
`
`BY APPLICANT
`(Use as many sheets as necessary)
`
`Application Number
`Filing Date
`
`13/342,795
`
`Complete if Known
`
`33342795 ~ GAL): 2453
`
`
`
`Subst. for form 1449/PTO
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Arwnt “
`Examiner Name
`Krlsna Lim
`
`
`
`
`Exhibit X6: Copy of US. Patent No. 6,496,867
`
`D594
`
`D595
`
`Exhibit X5: Wang, The Broadband Forum Technical Report, "TR-025 — Core Network Architecture
`Recommendations for Access to Legacy Data Networks over ADSL," lssue 1.0: pp. 1-24 , v1.0
`(1999).
`
`
`
`
`
`
`D596
`
`Exhibit X7: BinGO! User's Guide incorporating by Reference BinGO! Extended Feature Reference.
`
`D597
`
`
`
`Exhibit X7: Kent et al., “Security Architecture for the Internet Protocol, “ Network Working Group
`Request for Comments (RFC) 2401, pp 1-70 (1998).
`
`D598
`
`Exhibit X8: Copy of US. Patent No. 6,182,141
`
`- 0599
`- D600
`- D501
`- D602
`- D503
`
`D604
`
`Exhibit x9: BinGO! User’s Guide v1.6 (1999).
`Exhibit Y1: Aventail Extranet Server 3.0 Administrator's Guide.
`Exhibit v10: Hanks, 8., et al., RFC1701,“Generic Routing Encapsulation (GRE)," 1994, Is
`ExhibitY10: Socolofsky, T. et al., RFC 1180, “A TCP/IP Tutorial," January 1991.
`ExhibitY11: Simpson,W., editor, RFC 1661,“The Point-to-Point Protocol (PPP)," July1994.
`
`Accessbile at http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1701.txt.
`
`
`
`Exhibit Y1 1: Simpson, W., RFC1994, “PPP Challenge Handshake Authentication Protocol (CHAP),"
`1996, http://www.ietf.org/rdc/rfc1994.txt.
`
`- D505
`
`Exhibit Y12: Meyer, (3., RFC 1968, “The PPP Encryption Control Protocol (ECP)," June 1996.
`
`D606
`
`Exhibit Y12: Perkins, D., RFC1171, “The Point-To-Point Protocol for the Transmission of Multi-
`Protocoi Datagrams over Point-To-Point Links," 1990, Is Accessible at
`http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1171.txt.
`
`0507
`
`Exhibit Y13: Kummert, H., RFC 2420, “The PPP Triple-DES Encryption Protocol (3DESE),"
`September, 1998.
`
`
`
`1999.
`
`ExhibitY14: Townsley, W.M., eta|., RFC 2661, “LayerTwo Tunneling Protocol ‘L2TP‘," August
`- D608
`ExhibitY15: Pall, G.s., RFC 2118, “Microsoft Point-To-Point Encryption (MPPE) Protocol," March
`- D509
`m Exhibit Y16: Gross, (3.. et al., RFC 2364, “PPP Over AAL5,” Juiy1998.
`
`1997.
`
`
`
`
`
`D611
`
`D612
`
`Exhibit Y17: Srisuresh, P., RFC 2663, “IP Network Address Translator (NAT) Terminology and
`Considerations," August 1999.
`
`
`
`Exhibit Y18: Heinanen. J., RFC 1483, “Muitiprotocol Encapsulation Over ATM Adaptation Layer 5,"
`July 1993.
`
`D613
`
`Exhibit Y2: Goldschlag et al., “Hiding Routing Information" (1996).
`
`D615
`
`m Exhibit Y3: Copy of us. Patent No. 5,950,519
`
` Exhibit Y4: Ferguson, P. and Huston, G., “What Is a VPN", The Internet Protocol Journal, Vol 1.,
`
`
`
`No. 1 (June 1998 (“Ferguson").
`
`Exhibit Y5: Mockapetris, P., RFC 1034, "Domain Names — Concepts and Facilities," November
`1987 (“RFC1034”).
`
`ALL REFERENCES CONSiDERED EXCEPT WHERE LiNED THRQUGH.
`
`/K.L./
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. - Exhibit 1051, p. 757
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. - Exhibit 1051, p. 757
`
`

`

`Subst. for form 1449/PTO
`
`INFORMATION DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
`
`BY APPLICANT
`(Use as many sheets as necessary)
`
`Application Number
`
`Filing Date
`First Named Inventor
`
`Art Unit
`
`Complete if Known
`13/342,795
`
`~ 11A... 2453
`
`Krisnaum
`
`D617
`
`Exhibit Y6: Mockapetris, P., RFC 1035, “Domain Names — Implementation and Specification,"
`November 1987 (“RFC1035”).
`
`- 0618
`
`Exhibit Y8: Fielding, R., et aI., RFC 2068, "Hypertext Transfer Protocol — HTTP/1.1," January 1997.
`
`D619
`
`Exhibit Y8: Woodburn, RA, et aI., RFC1241, “A Scheme for an Internet Encapsulation Protocol:
`Version 1," 1991.
`
`- 0620
`
`Exhibit Y9: Leech, M., et al., RFC 1928, “Socks Protocol Version 5," March 1996.
`
`D621
`
`D622
`
`D623
`
`Exhibit Y9: Simpson, W., RFC1853, “IP in IP Tunneling," 1995, Is Accessible at
`http://ww.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1583.txt.
`
`Form PTO/SB/42, Listing Each Patent and Printed Publication Relied Upon to Provide a Substantial
`New Question of Patentability (Patent No. 6,502,135)
`
`Form PTO/SB/42, Listing Each Patent and Printed Publication Relied Upon to Provide a Substantial
`New Question of Patentability (Patent No. 7,490,151)
`
`VlCtOf Larson
`
`
`
`
`
`- D624 Request for Inter Partes Reexamination (Patent No. 6,502,135)
`- 0625 Request for Inter Partes Reexamination Transmittal Form (PTO/SB/58) (Patent No. 6,502,135)
`- 0626 Request for Inter Partes Reexamination Transmittal Form (PTO/SB/58) (Patent No. 7,490,151)
`
`D627 Request for Inter Partes Reexamination Under 35 U.S.C. § 311 (Patent No. 6,502,135)
`
`0628 Request for Inter Partes Reexamination Under 35 U.S.C. § 311 (Patent No. 7,490,151)
`
`D629
`
`D630
`
`D631
`
`D632
`
`- D633
`- D634
`
`0535
`
`- 0536
`
`D637
`
`Transmittal Letter (Patent No. 6,502,135)
`
`Transmittal Letter (Patent No. 7,490,151)
`
`JOint Claim Construction and Prehearing Statement
`
`Exhibit A: Agreed Upon Terms; P.R. 4-3 Joint Claims Construction and Prehearing Statement
`
`Exhibit B: Disputed Claim Terms; P.R. 4-3 Joint Claim Construction and Prehearing Statement
`Exhibit C; VirnetX's Proposed Construction of CIaim Terms and Supporting Evidence
`
`Exhibit D; Defendants' Intrinsic and Extrinsic Support; P.R. 4-3 Joint Claim Construction and
`Prehearing Statement
`
`File History of US. Patent 6,839,759
`
`
`Exhibit 8-4; VirnetX, Inc. v. Microsoft Corp., Case No. 6:07-cv-80, Microsoft's Motion for Partial
`Summary Judgment of Invalidity of US. Patent No. 6,839,759 (E.D. Tex. Dec. 18, 2009)
`
`D638
`
`Exhibit 0-2; Kent et aI., "Security Architecture for the Internet Protocol," lntemet Engineering Task
`Force, Internet Draft, (Feb. 1998)
`
`D639
`
`and Reception of Data Packets Between Computer Networks," Filed Sept. 15, 1994 and issued Aug.
`
`Exhibit0-3;Azizetal., US. Patent5,548,646toAzizetal.,"SystemforSignaturelessTransmission -
`20. 1996
`
`ALL REFERENCES CONSiDERED EXCEPT WHERE LiNED THRQUGH.
`
`/K.L./
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. - Exhibit 1051, p. 758
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. - Exhibit 1051, p. 758
`
`

`

`13342795 ~ GAU: 2453
`Subst. for form 1449/PTO
`Complete if Known
`
`
`
`
`'NFORMAT'0“ °'$°L°$”RE STATEMENT —-mm_
`
`
`53!. ii‘i’nt'fiéiilmm,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`—“
`
`
`
`NNu:ono _'l a: 2'.<Nz x.'b O 'U w0 z 'n—'8'
`
`Applications on a Computer on an as needed basis, Filed on October 28, 1996 and Issued
`September 28, 1999
`
`Exhibit D-8; Barlow; US. Patent 5,204,961 to Barlow, “Computer Network Operating with Multilevel
`Hierarchical Security with Selectable Common Trust Realms and Corresponding Security
`Protocols," Filed on June 25, 1990 and Issued April 20, 1993
`
`Exhibit D-12; RFC 1122, Braden, “Requirements for Internet Hosts — Communication Layers," RFC
`1122 (Oct. 1989)
`
`Exhibit D-13; RFC 791; Information Sciences Institute, “Internet Protocol," DARPA Internet Program
`Specification RFC 791 (Sept. 1981)
`
`Exhibit D-14; Caronni et aI., “SKIP — Securing the Internet," 5th International Workshops on
`Enabling Technologies: Infrastructure for Collaborative Enterprises (WET ICE '96) (June 19-21,
`1996)
`
`Exhibit D-15; Maughan et aI., “Internet Security Association and Key Management Protocol
`(ISAKMP), " IPSEC Work Group Draft (July 26, 1997)
`
`D642
`
`D643
`
`D644
`
`0545
`
`Exhibit E-1; Claim Charts Applying Kiuchi as a Primary Reference to the ‘759 Patent. - 0647
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`- D646
`
`
`- 0648
`
`Exhibit E 2 Claim Charts Applying Kent as a Primary Reference to the ‘759 Patent
`Exhibit E-3 Claim Charts Applying Azrz as a anary Reference to the ‘759 Patent
`
`0649
`
`Exhibit E-4; Claim Charts Applying Kent in view of Caronni as a Primary Combination of References
`to the ‘759 Patent
`
`- 0650
`
`Exhibit D-5; Edwards et aI., “High Security Web Servers and Gateways," Computer Networks and
`
`ISDN System 29, pages 927-938 (Sept. 1997)
`
`0651
`
`Exhibit D-10; Lee et al., “Hypertext Transfer Protocol — HTTP/1.0," RFC 1945 (May 1996)
`
`- 0652
`
`Exhibit E-3; Claim Charts Applying Blum to Claims of the '151 Patent
`
`9653
`
`Exhibit 3-1, File History of us. Patent 7,490,151
`
`0654
`
`Exhibit E-1, Claim Charts Applying Kiuchi, and Kiuchi and Martin to Claims of the ‘151 Patent
`
`
`
`0655
`
`Exhibit E-2, Claim Charts Applying Wesinger, and Wesinger and Martin to Claims of the ‘151 Patent
`
`0656
`
`D657
`
`0658
`
`
`
`- 0659
`
`- 0660
`
`-
`0661
`
`
`D662
`
`Exhibit E-4, Claim Charts Applying Aziz and Edwards, and Aziz, Edwards, and Martin to Claims of
`the ‘151 Patent
`
`
`
`Exhibit E-6, Claim Charts Applying Wesinger and Edwards, and Wesinger, Edwards, and Martin to
`Claims of the ‘151 Patent
`
`VirnetX Inc., V. Mitel Networks Corp.; Defendants' Joint Invalidity Contentions
`
`Exhibit 37, RFC 26611 vs. Claims of the “135 Patent 2
`Exhibit 38, RFC 2661‘ vs. Claims of the ‘211 Patent 2
`‘
`Exhibit 39, RFC 2661 vs. Claims of the “504 Patent 2
`Exhibit 40, SecureConnect1 vs. Claims of the ‘135 Patent 2
`
`
`
`ALL REFERENCES CONSiDERED EXCEPT WHERE LiNED THRQUGH.
`
`/K.L./
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. - Exhibit 1051, p. 759
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. - Exhibit 1051, p. 759
`
`

`

`Subst. for form 1449/PTO
`
`INFORMATION DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
`
`BY APPLICANT
`(Use as many sheets as necessary)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`- 0663
`
`$342795 e GAU: 2453
`
`Complete if Known
`13/342 795
`
`Application Number
`
`Filing Date
`errstttenentnventer
`
`Antrnt “
`Examiner Name
`Krlsna Lim
`
`77580-155(VRNK-1CP3CNFT5)
`
` Docket Number
`
`Exhibit 44, SFS-HTTP‘ vs. Claims ofthe 1211 Patent2
`
`Exhibit 48 US‘8831vs Claims of the ‘504 Patent2
`
`- 1
`0671
`Exhibit 49 Chuah1 vs. Claims of the 1135 Patent2
`0672
`Exhibit 50, Chuah1 vs. Claims of the 1211 Patent 2
`
`D673
`
`Exhibit 51, Chuah1 vs. Claims of the 1504 Patent2
`
`0674
`
`Exhibit 52, us. ‘6481 vs. Claims of the 1135 Patent 2
`
`0675
`
`Exhibit 53, U.S. ‘6481vs. Claims of the ‘211 Patent 2
`
`----
`
`
`
`
`
`--
`
`0665
`- 0666
`- 0667
`- 0668
`- 0669
`0670
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`____-
`
`1
`1
`
`1____ -
`
`
`
`D687
`
` 0688
`
`Exhibit 68, RFC 2486 vs Claims of the ‘211 Patent2
`
`Exhibit 69, RFC 24861 vs. Claims of the 1504 Patent 2
`
`
`,
`- .
`- -
`
`ALL REFERENCES CONSiDERED EXCEPT WHERE LiNED THRQUGH.
`
`/K.L./
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. - Exhibit 1051, p. 760
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. - Exhibit 1051, p. 760
`
`

`

`Subst. for form 1449/PTO
`”m 9'
`INFORMATION DISCLOSURE STATEMENT F;:;°;::
`BY APPLICANT
`(Use as many sheets as necessary)
`F'rSt Named inventor
`Alt Unit
`
`N
`
`b
`
`A I'
`
`t'
`
`i33427§5 ~ GAL): 2453
`Complete if Known
`’7 5
`13/342 9
`
`Victor Larson
`
`0689
`
`Exhibit 70 Understanding lPSec1 vs. Claims of the ‘135 Patent 2
`
`Examiner Name
`
`Krisna Lim
`
`Docket Number
`
`77580-155(VRNK-1CP3CNFT5)
`
`
`
`
`
`D702
`
`Exhibit 83, us ‘261‘ vs. Claims of the ‘211 Patent 2
`
`D703
`
`Exhibit 84, US ‘2611 vs. Claims of the ‘504 Patent 2
`
`iNoN
`iNoco
`D709
`
`mxE E.. 099° C (D 05 N —l <E” QE. 3a) O_.
`
`..2'(‘D J m 01 'Um..(‘DD..
`
`m Xa: g... co5° C (I) 0'5 N d <.U’ Q9.3tn o_.
`
`..:r m N- d d 'Um...CD 3...
`
`M
`
`N
`
`Exhibit 90, US “6711 vs. Claims of the ‘504 Patent 2
`
`U \l _L o- Exhibit 91, JP ‘704‘ vs. Claims of the ‘135 Patent 2
`
`U N _L _L
`
`Exhibit 92, JP ‘704‘ vs. Claims of the '211 Patent 2
`
`D712
`
`Exhibit 93, JP ‘704‘ vs. Claims of the ‘504 Patent 2
`
`D713
`
`Exhibit 94, GB ‘8411 vs. Claims of the ‘135 Patent 2
`
`
`
`D714
`
`Exhibit 95, GB “8411 vs. Claims of the ‘211 Patent 2
`
`
`
`ALL REFERENCES CONSiDERED EXCEPT WHERE LiNED THRQUGH.
`
`/K.L./
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. - Exhibit 1051, p. 761
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`--
`
`- Exhibit 71, Understanding lPSec1 vs. Claims of the ‘211 Patent 2
`-- Exhibit 72, Understanding iPSec1 vs. Claims of the ‘504 Patent 2
`-- Exhibit 73, US ‘8201 vs. Claims of the ‘135 Patent 2
`-- Exhibit 74, us “820‘ vs. Claims of the ‘211 Patent 2
`-- Exhibit 75, us ‘8201 vs. Claims of the ‘504 Patent 2
`-- Exhibit 76, us “019‘ vs. Claims of the ‘211 Patent 2
`
`Exhibit 77, us ‘019‘ vs. Claims of the '504 Patent 2
`
`0697
`
`Exhibit 78, us ‘049‘ vs. Claims of the ‘135 Patent 2
`
`0698
`
`Exhibit 79, us '049‘ vs. Claims of the ‘211 Patent 2
`
`0699
`
`Exhibit 80, us ‘049‘ vs. Claims of the '504 Patent 2
`
`- D700
`D701
`
`Exhibit81, us '748‘vs. Claims ofthe ‘135 Patent2
`Exhibit 82, us '261‘ vs. Claims of the ‘135 Patent 2
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. - Exhibit 1051, p. 761
`
`

`

`333427Q5 ~ GAL): 2453
`Complete if Known
`13/342,795
`
`Application Number
`
`Filing Date
`nineoNeneoinvenor
`
`
`Subst. for form 1449/PTO
`
`
`INFORMATION DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
`
`
`BY APPLICANT
`Anuno —a_
`(Use as many sheets as necessary)
`
`-- Exhibit 96, GB ‘841‘vs. Claims of the “504 Patent 2
`
`D716
`Exhibit 97, us ‘318‘ vs. Claims of the '135 Patent 2
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Examiner Name
`
`Krlsna Lim
`
`D717
`
`Exhibit 98, us ‘318‘ vs. Claims of the '211 Patent 2
`
`D721
`
`Exhibit 102, Nikkei1 vs. Claims of the ‘211 Patent 2
`
`D722
`
`Exhibit 103, Nikkei1 vs. Claims of the ‘504 Patent 2
`
`D723
`
`Exhibit 104, SpeCIal Anthology1 vs. Claims of the ‘135 Patent 2
`
`D724
`
`Exhibit 106-A, Gauntlet System1 vs. Claims of the ‘135 Patent 2
`
`- D725
`D726
`
`Exhibit109-A, Gauntlet System1 vs. Claims ofthe '211 Patentz
`Exhibit 110-A, Gauntlet System1 vs. Claims of the ‘504 Patent 2
`
`
`
`1
`
`D737
`
`Exhibit 137 Schulzrinne1 vs. Claims of the‘135 (Final) Patent2
`
`
`
`_______ -
`
`D738
`
`.
`-
`Exhibit 140 Schulzrinne1 vs. Claims of the ‘211 Patent2
`1
`- ,
`-
`Exhibit 141 Schulzrinne vs Claims of the “504 Patent2
`D739
`-
`D740
`Exhibit 143, Solana1 vs Claims of the ‘135 Patent 2
`
`
`
`ALL REFERENCES CONSiDERED EXCEPT WHERE LiNED THRQUGH.
`
`/K.L./
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. - Exhibit 1051, p. 762
`
`
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. - Exhibit 1051, p. 762
`
`

`

`$342795 ~ GAL): 2453
`
`Application Number
`
`Filing Date
`First Named Inventor
`
`Art Unit
`
`Examiner Name
`
`Complete if Known
`13/342,795
`
`VlCtOl' Larson
`
`Krisna Lim
`
`_-
`--—-
`
`__
`
`-
`_-
`D746
`Exhibit 168, Aziz1 vs. Claims of the '135 Patent 2
`
`D747
`
`Exhibit 171, 0.3. ‘234‘ vs. Claims of the “211 Patent 2
`
`D748
`
`Exhibit 172, Aziz1 vs. Claims of the ‘504 Patent 2
`
`D749
`
`Exhibit 175, Valencia1 vs. Claims of the ‘135 Patent 2
`
`D750
`
`Exhibit 178, Valencia1 vs. Claims of the ‘211 Patent 2
`
`D751
`
`Exhibit 179, Valencia1 vs. Claims of the ‘504 Patent 2
`
`D752
`
`Exhibit 181, Davison1 vs. Claims of the ‘135 Patent 2
`
`D753
`
`Exhibit 184, Davison1 vs. Claims of the ‘211 Patent2
`
`D754
`
`Exhibit 135, Davison‘ vs. Claims of the ‘504 Patent 2
`
`D755
`
`Exhibit 200, BinGO! User's Guide/Extended Features Reference1 vs. Claims of the ‘135 Patent 2
`
`D756
`
`Exhibit 2203. Broadband Forum Technical Report TR-025 (Issue 1.0/5.0)1 vs. Claims of the ‘135
`Patent
`
`'
`
`D757
`
`Exhibit 2206, RFC 2230, Key Exchange Delegation Record for the DNS1 vs. Claims of the '211
`Patent
`
`D758
`
`Exhibit 2207, RFC 2230, Key Exchange Delegation Record for the DNS1 vs. Claims of the ‘504
`Patent
`
`D759
`Exhibit 208,2RFC 2538, Storing Certificates in the Domain Name System (DNS)1 vs. Claims of the
`‘211 Patent
`
`
`Exhibit 209, RFC 2538, Storing Certificates in the Domain Name System (DNS)1 vs. Claims of the
`‘504 Patent 2
`
`D760
`
`D761
`
`D762
`
`D763
`
`Exhibit 212, RFC 2486, RFC 2661, RFC 2401 and lntemet—Draft, “Secure Remote Access with
`L2TP" vs. Claims of the ‘135 Patent 2
`
`2Exhibit 218, US. Patent No. 6,496,867 in combination with RFC 2401'1 vs. Claims of the '135 Patent
`
`
`
`Exhibit 219, US. Patent No. 6,496,8671 vs. Claims of the ‘211 Patent2
`
`D764
`
`Exhibit 220, US. Patent No. 6,496,8671 vs. Claims of the ‘504 Patent 2
`
`D765
`
`Exhibit 222, US. Patent No. 6,557,0371 vs. Claims of the ‘211 Patent 2
`
`
`
`
`
`
`ALL REFERENCES CONSiDERED EXCEPT WHERE LiNED THRQUGH.
`
`/K.L./
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. - Exhibit 1051, p. 763
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Subst. for form 1449/PTO
`
`INFORMATION DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
`
`BY APPLICANT
`(Use as many sheets as necessary)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. - Exhibit 1051, p. 763
`
`

`

`Subst. for form 1449/PTO
`
`
`
`
`
`INFORMATION DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
`BY APPLICANT
`
`
`(Use as many sheets as necessary)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Fringoate _m=:a_
`First Named lnventor
`
`Am “
`Examiner Name
`
`Docket Number
`
`77580-155(VRNK-1CP3CNFT5)
`
`333427Q5 ~ GAL): 2453
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`---
`
`D766
`
`D767
`
`
`Exhibit 223, US. Patent No. 6,557,0371 vs. Claims of the ‘504 Patent 2
`Exhibit 2224, RFC 2230, Key Exchange Delegation Record for the DNS1 vs. Claims of the ‘135
`Patent
`
`Exhibit 228, us. 588‘ vs. Claims of the '21 1 Patent 2 (Final)
`
`-
`Exhibit 229, us. 588‘ vs. Claims of the ‘504 Patent 2(Final)
`-_-
`Exhibit 231, Microsoft VPN‘ vs. Claims of the “211 Patent 2 (Final)
`-
`Exhibit XX, Microsoft VPN1 vs. Claims of the '504 Patent2
`-
`Exhibit Cisco-1, Cisco’s Prior Art System1 vs. Claims of the ‘135 Patent2
`-
`Exhibit Cisco-4, Cisco's Prior Art System1 vs. Claims of the ‘211 Patent2
`-
`Exhibit Cisco-5, Cisco's Prior Art System1 vs. Claims of the ‘504 Patent2
`
`D775
`
`D776
`
`Exhibit 225, us '037‘ vs. Claims of the '135 Patentz
`
`D777
`
`Exhibit 226, lTU-T Standardization Activities1 vs. Claims of the ‘135 Patent2
`
`
`
`D778
`
`Exhibit 227, us ‘393‘ vs. Claims of the ‘135 Patent2
`
`D779
`
`Exhibit 233, The Miller Application1 vs. Claim 13 of the ‘135 Patent2
`
`
`
`Exhibit 234, Aventail Connect 3.1/2.6 Administrator’s Guide (“Aventail Connect")1 vs. Claims of the
`‘504 Patent2
`
`
`
`- D781
`D782
`
`D783
`
`Exhibit 235, Microsoft VPN‘ vs. Claims of the ‘504 Patent2
`Exhibit 1, IETF RFC 2065: Domain Name System Security Extensions; published January 19971 vs.
`Claims of the '211 Patent2
`
`
`Exhibit 2, IETF RFC 2065: Domain Name System Security Extensions; published January 19971 vs.
`Claims of the ‘504 Patent2
`
`-
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`D784
`
`Exhibit 3, RFC 2543‘ vs. Claims of the ‘135 Patent2
`
`Exhibit 4, RFC 2543‘ vs. Claims of the '211 Patent2
`
`Exhibit 5, RFC 2543‘ vs. Claims of the ‘504 Patent2
`
`Exhibit 6, SIP Draft v.2‘ vs. Claims of the '135 Patent2
`
`Exhibit 7, SIP Draft v.2‘ vs. Claims of the '211 Patent2
`
`D789
`
`Exhibit 8, SIP Draft v.21 vs. Claims of the '504 Patent2
`
`D790
`
`Exhibit 9, H.323‘ vs. Claims of the ‘135 Patent2
`
`ALL REFERENCES CONSiDERED EXCEPT WHERE LiNED THEQUGH.
`
`/K.L./
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. - Exhibit 1051, p. 764
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. - Exhibit 1051, p. 764
`
`

`

`
`
`Subst. for form 1449/PTO
`
`
`
`
`“i 342735 ~ GAL): 2453
`Complete if Known
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`INFORMATION DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
`
`BY APPLICANT
`(Use as many sheets as necessary)
`
`Filingoate m
`First Named inventor
`
`Anumt ‘_
`
`Docket Number
`
`77580-155(VRNK-1CP3CNFT5)
`
`D791
`
`Exhibit 10, H.3231 vs. Claims of the ‘211 Patentz
`
`D792
`
`Exhibit 11, H.3231 vs. Claims of the ‘504 Patentz
`
`D793
`
`Exhibit 12, SSL 3.01 vs. Claims of the '135 Patentz
`
`D794
`
`Exhibit 13, SSL 3.01 vs. Claims of the ‘211 Patentz
`
`D802
`
`Exhibit 23, iPass1 vs. Claims of the '504 Patentz
`
`D803
`
`Exhibit 24, US. Patent No. 6,453,034 (‘034 Patent") vs. Claims of the 135 Patent1
`
`0804
`
`Exhibit 25, US. Patent No. 6,453,034 (‘034 Patent") vs. Claims of the 211 Patent1
`
`
`
`-----
`
`----
`
`-- Exhibit 27, us. Patent No. 6,223,287 (“287 Patent") vs. Claims of the 135 Patent‘
`-- Exhibit 28, us. Patent No. 6,223,287 (“287 Patent”) vs. Claims of the 211 Patent1
`
`_-
`
`0809
`
`1
`.
`Exhibit 35, RFC 1928 vs Claims of the ‘211 Patent2
`
`Exhibit 36 RFC 1928‘vs. Claims of the ‘504 Patent?
`
`Exhibit 106 Gaunlet System and Gaunlet References‘ vs. Claims of the ‘135 Patent2
`1
`.
`
`1
`
`.
`
`Exhibit109 Gaunlet System and Gaunlet References vs Claims of the ‘211 Patentz
`- 0812
`- 0813 Exhibit 110 Gaunlet System vs Claims of the ‘504 Patent2
`
`0814
`Exhibit 130, Ovewlew of Access VPNs and Tunneling Technologies (“OvervieVlf’)1 vs. Claims of the
`‘135 Patent2
`
`
`
`815
`
`Exhibit 133t,ZOverview of Access VPNs and Tunneling Technologies (“Overvielllr”)1 vs. Claims of the
`‘211 Paten
`
`
`ALL REFERENCES CONSiDERED EXCEPT WHERE LiNED THRQUGH.
`
`/K.L./
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. - Exhibit 1051, p. 765
`
`
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. - Exhibit 1051, p. 765
`
`

`

`Subst. for form 1449/PTO
`
`
`
`INFORMATION DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
`BY APPLICANT
`(Use as many sheets as necessary)
`
`$342795 ~ GAL): 2453
`Complete if Known
`Application Number
`13l342,795
`Fitngoae m
`First Named Inventor
`Victor Larson
`
`
`
`
`
`Docket Number
`
`77580-155(VRNK-1CP3CNFT5)
`
`816
`
`Exhibit 134, Overview of Access VPNs and Tunneling Technologies (“Overview")1 vs. Claims of the
`'504 Patent2
`
`1
`
`.
`
`9821
`
`Exhibit 165 Wesinger1 vs. Claims of the ‘211 Patentz
`
`D822
`
`Exhibit 166 Wesmger1 vs. Claims of the ‘504 Patent2
`
`I
`
`D823
`
`Exhibit 187, AutoSOCKS v2.11 vs. Claims of the ‘135 Patent2
`
`9824
`
`Exhibit 191, Aventail Connect 3.01/2.51 (“Aventail Connect”)1 vs. Claims of the ‘135 Patent2
`
`D825 ‘135 Patent2
`
`Exhibit 195. Aventail Connect 3.1/2.6 Administrator’s Guide '(“Aventail Connect")1 vs. Claims of the
`
`D826
`
`Exhibit 204, Domain Name System (DNS) Security vs Claims of the ‘211 Patent2
`
`D827
`0828
`0829
`
`D830
`
`Exhibit 205, Domain Name System (DNS) Security1 (“DNS Security") vs. Claims of the ‘504 Patent2 -
`Exhibit 210, Lendenmann1