Subst. for fonn 1449IPTO
`Complete if Know
`
`
`
`
`
`
`j_
`
`
`
`BY APPLICANT
`(Use as many sheets as necessary)
`
`INFORMATION DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
`
`
`
`D355
`
`Exhibit 42,SecureConnect' vs. Claims of the -504 Patent’
`
`D356
`
`Exhibit 43. SFS-HTTP‘ vs. Claims of the '135 Patentz
`
`D357
`
`Exhibit 44, SFS—H‘lTP' vs. Claims of the ‘211 Patent’
`
`D358
`
`Exhibit 45. SFS-HTTP‘ vs. Claims of the ‘504 Patentz
`
`D359
`
`Exhibit 46. US ‘883‘ vs. Claims of the '135 Patentz
`
`D360
`
`Exhibit 47. us ‘883‘ vs. Claims of the ‘211 Patent’
`
`.
`
`D361
`
`Exhibit 48. us teas‘ vs. Claims of the ‘504 Patent’
`
`D362
`
`Exhibit 49, US ‘132‘ vs. Claims of the ‘135 Patentz
`
`D363
`
`Exhibit 50. US ‘132' vs. Claims of the ‘211 Patentz
`
`D364
`Exhibit 51, US ‘132‘ vs. Claims of the ‘504 Patentz
`E Exhibit 52, US '213‘ vs. Claims of the ‘135 Patent’
`D366
`Exhibit 53. US ‘213‘ vs. Claims of the ‘211 Patent’
`
`D
`
`
`
`Exhibit 57, B&M vPNs‘ vs. Claims of the ‘504 Patent’
`
`07/-90/2012
`/Ka‘isna Lim./’
`/K.L./
`ALL REFERENCES CQi\ESiDEREE3 EXCEPT WHERE UNED THRQUGH.
`Petitioner Apple Inc. — Exhibit 1002, p. 1290
`
`
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. - Exhibit 1002, p. 1290
`
`

`
` " :2;
`
`
`
`
`
`D375
`
`Exhibit 62, Prestige 128 Plus‘ vs. Claims of the ‘211 Patent’
`
`D376
`
`Exhibit 63, Prestige 128 Plus‘ vs. Claims of the ‘504 Patent’
`
`D377
`
`Exhibit 64, RFC 2401‘ vs. Claims of the ‘135 Patent’
`
`D378
`
`Exhibit 65, RFC 2401‘vs. Claims of the ‘211 Patent:
`
`D379
`
`Exhibit 66, RFC 2401‘ vs. Claims of the ‘504 Patent’
`
`D380
`
`Exhibit 67, RFC 2486' vs. Claims of the ‘135 Patentz
`
`D381
`
`Exhibit 68, RFC 2486' vs. Claims of the ‘211 Patent’
`
`D382
`
`Exhibit 69, RFC 2486‘ vs. Claims of the ‘504 Patentz
`
`D383
`
`Exhibit 70, Understanding |PSec1 vs. Claims of the ‘135 Patentz
`
`D384
`Exhibit 71, Understanding lPSec1 vs. Claims of the ‘211 Patentz
`@ Exhibit 72, Understanding lPSec‘ vs. Claims of the ‘504 Patent’
`
`D386
`
`Exhibit 73, us ‘820' vs. claims of the ‘135 Patent’
`
`D387
`
`Exhibit 74, US '8201vs. Claims of the ‘211 Patent’
`
`.
`
`D388
`
`Exhibit 75, US ‘820' vs. Claims of the ‘504 Patent’
`
`D389
`
`Exhibit 76, US '01 9' vs. Claims of the ‘211 Patent:
`
`Exhibit 77, us 019‘ vs. Claims of the ‘504 Patent’
`
`D391
`
`Exhibit 78, US ‘D491 vs. Claims of the ‘135 Patent’
`
`M Exhibit 79, us ‘M9’ vs. Claims of the -211 Patent’
`
`D393
`
`Exhibit 80, US ‘049' vs. Claims of the ‘504 Patent’
`
`m Exhibit 81, us ‘748' vs. Claims of the ‘135 Patent’
`
`D395
`
`Exhibit 82, us ‘261‘vs. claims of the ‘135 Patent’
`
`Exhibit 83, US '261' vs. Claims of the ‘211 Patent’
`
`D397
`
`Exhibit 84, US '261' vs. Claims of the ‘504 Patent’
`
`D398
`
`Exhibit 85, US ‘900' vs. Claims of the ‘135 Patentz
`
`D399
`
`Exhibit 86, US ‘900' vs. Claims of the ‘211 Patent’
`
`
`
`/Krisna Lim/
`
`07/2- /2012
`
`ALL REFERENCES CQi\ESiDEREE3 EXCEPT WHERE LiE\lED THRQUGH.
`
`/K.L./
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. — Exhibit 1002, p. 1291
`
`
`Subst. for form 1449/PTO
`INFORMATION DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
`BY APPLICANT
`(Use as many sheets as necessary)
`
`F.
`
`E’
`
`Complete if Kn E
`.
`13'3" 79°
`.
`vwtor Larson
`
`K"s"a Um
`
`jj
`
`Exhibit 61, Prestige 128 Plus‘ vs. Claims of the ‘135 Patent’
`
`
`
`D374
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. - Exhibit 1002, p. 1291
`
`

`
`
`453
`Complete if
`
`Application Number
`1 25/336,790
`We Date
`First Named Inventor
`Art Unit TE
`Exammer~ame
`2‘ Docket Number
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`77580-151(VRNK-0001CP3CNFT1)
`
`Subst. for form 1449/PTO
`
`
`
`INFORMATION DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
`
`BY APPLICANT
`(Use as many sheets as necessary)
`
`
`
`
`
`D404
`
`Exhibit 91, JP ‘704‘ vs. Claims of the '135 Patentz
`
`-
`
`
`
`
`
`D406
`
`Exhibit 93, JP ‘704‘ vs. Claims of the ‘504 Patentz
`
`-
`
`
`
`- D412
`
`Exhibit 99, US '318' vs. Claims of the ‘504 Patentz
`
`D415
`
`Exhibit 102, N|KKE|' vs. Claims of the ‘211 Patentz
`
`-
`
`
`
`-
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Z1- /
`
`Krisna Lim/'
`
`07/20/20:2
`
`ALL REFERENCES CQf\ES§DEEEE3 EXCEPT WHERE UNED THEQUGH.
`
`/K.L./
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. — Exhibit 1002, p. 1292
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. - Exhibit 1002, p. 1292
`
`

`
`vvw-'.-.~
`complete if Knw
`13,336’-'90
`
`.
`
`"
`
`
`" j.‘
`
`
`First Named Inventor
`Art Unit
`
`Examiner Name
`
`Victor Larson
`
`Krisna Lim
`
`Subst. forform 1449lPTO
`INFORMATION DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
`av APPLICANT
`(Use as many sheets as necessary)
`
`
`
`
`
`Exhibit 113, lntraPort System‘ vs. Claims of the ‘151 Patent’
`
`D427
`
`Exhibit 114, lntraPort System‘ vs. Claims of the ‘180 Patent’
`
`D428
`
`Exhibit 115, lntraPort System‘ vs. Claims of the ‘211 Patent’
`
`M Exhibit 116, |ntraPort System‘ vs. Claims of the ‘504 Patentz
`
`D430
`
`Exhibit 117, |ntraPort System‘ vs. Claims of the ‘759 Patentz
`
`Exhibit 118, Altiga VPN system‘ vs. Claims of the '135 Patent’
`Exhibit 119, Altiga VPN system‘ vs. Claims of the ‘151 Patentz
`Exhibit 12o, Altiga VPN system‘ vs. Claims of the ‘180 Patentz
`Exhibit 121, Altiga VPN System‘ vs. Claims of the ‘211 Patentz
`Exhibit 122, Altiga VPN System‘ vs. Claims of the ‘504 Patent:
`
`D435
`
`D436
`
`Exhibit 123, Altiga VPN System‘ vs. Claims of the ‘759 Patent’
`
`D437
`
`Exhibit 124, Kiuchi‘ vs. Claims of the i135 Patentz
`
`D438
`
`Exhibit 125, Kiuchi1 vs. Claims of the ‘151 Patent:
`
`D439
`
`Exhibit 126, Kiuchi' vs. Claims of the ‘180 Patentz
`
`Exhibit 127, Kiuchi' vs. Claims of the ‘211 Patent’
`W Exhibit 123, Kiuchi‘ vs. Claims of the -504 Patentz
`M Exhibit 129, Kiuchi' vs. Claims of the ‘759 Patentz
`Exhibit 130thOverview ofAccess VPNsandTunnelingTechnologies (“Overview")' vs. Claims ofthe
`Exhibit 131EOverview ofAccess VPNsand Tunneling Technologies (“Overview")' vs. Claims ofthe
`
`‘151 Patent
`
`‘135 Paten
`
`Exhibit 132, Overview of Access VPNs and Tunneling Technologies ("Overview")' vs. Claims of the
`‘180 Patent’
`
`‘211 Patent’
`
`Exhibit 133, Overview ofAccess VPNsand TunnelingTechnologies ('Overview")' vs. Claims ofthe
`Exhibit 134, Overview ofAccess VPNsand Tunneling Technologies (“Overview")' vs. Claims ofthe
`Exhibit 135, overview‘ vs. Claims of the ‘759 Patent’
`
`‘504 Patentz
`
`Exhibit 136, RFC 2401‘ vs. Claims of the ‘759 Patentz
`
`/Krisna Lim/’
`
`O7/20/2012
`
`ALL REFERENCES CQi\ESiDEREi3 EXCEPT WHERE LiE\iED THRQUGH.
`
`/K.L./
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. — Exhibit 1002, p. 1293
`
`
`
`448
`
`
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. - Exhibit 1002, p. 1293
`
`

`
`
`
`TE
`
`‘E
`
`
`
`
`
`INFORMATION DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
`
`BY APPLICANT
`(Use as many sheets as necessary)
`
`
`
`
`Subst. for form 1449/PTO
`
`can-|p|ete if Knawn
`
`-—_—
`M Exhibit 137, Schulzrinne‘ vs. Claims of the '135 Patent’
`m Exhibit 138, schuizrinne‘ vs. Claims of the '151 Patent‘
`M Exhibit 139, Schu|zn‘nne' vs. Claims of the ‘180 Patent’
`@ Exhibit 140, Schulzrinne‘ vs. Claims of the *211 Patent’
`
`Exhibit 141. Schu|zrinne' vs. Claims of the ‘504 Patentz
`
`‘E Exhibit 142, Schulzrinne' vs. Claims of the '759 Patentz
`
`Exhibit 143, soiana‘ vs. Claims of the '13s Patent’
`
`Exhibit 144. Solana‘ vs. Claims of the ‘151 Patent’
`
`Exhibit 145, SoIana' vs. Claims of the ‘180 Patent’
`
`D458
`
`M Exhibit 146. So|ana' vs. Claims of the ‘211 Patent:
`
`D460
`
`Exhibit 147, Solana' vs. Claims of the ‘504 Patent’
`
`- D457
`
`
`
`M MM
`
`Exhibit 148, Solana' vs. Claims of the ‘759 Patent’
`
`Exhibit 149, Atkinson‘ vs. Claims of the '13s Patent’
`
`- Exhibit 151, Atkinson‘ vs. Claims of the ‘180 Patent’
`1%
`
`ZZIII
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/Krisna Limi’
`
`
`
`
`
`O7/'20/2012
`
`ALL REFERENCES COi\ESiDEREE3 EXCEPT WHERE UNED THRQUGH.
`
`/K.E.../
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. — Exhibit 1002, p. 1294
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. - Exhibit 1002, p. 1294
`
`

`
`13'33°’7°°
`Victor Larson
`
`Kfisna Um
`77580-151(VRNK-0001CP3CNFT1)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`VVV!‘
`
`Subst. for form 1449/PTO
`
`c°rnp|ete Known
`
`
` INFORMATION DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
`BY APPLICANT _
`(Use as many sheets as necessary)
`First Named inventor
`Art Unit
`
`
`-— Docket Number
`Exhibit 163, Wesinger' vs. Claims of the ‘151 Patent’
`Exhibit 164, Wesinger‘ vs. Claims of the ‘180 Patent’
`Exhibit 165, wesinger‘ vs. Claims of the ‘211 Patent’
`Exhibit 166, Wesinger' vs. Claims of the ‘504 Patent’
`Exhibit 167, Wesinger' vs. Claims of the ‘759 Patent’
`Exhibit 168, Aziz (‘234)‘ vs. Claims of the '135 Patent’
`Exhibit 169, Aziz (‘234)1vs. Claims of the ‘151 Patentz
`Exhibit 170, Aziz (‘234)‘ vs. Claims of the ‘180 Patent’
`Exhibit 171, Aziz (‘234)' vs. Claims of the ‘211 Patent’
`Exhibit 172, Aziz c234)‘ vs. Claims of the ‘504 Patent’
`Exhibit 173, Aziz (‘234)' vs. Claims of the '759 Patent’
`Exhibit 174, Schneider‘ vs. Claims of the 759 Patent’
`Exhibit 175, Valencia‘ vs. Claims of the ‘135 Patent’
`
`D478
`
`D480
`
`D482
`
`D486
`
`‘ D488
`
`D489
`
`Exhibit 176, Valencia‘ vs. Claims of the ‘151 Patent’
`
`D490
`
`Exhibit 177, Valencia‘ vs. Claims of the ‘180 Patent’
`
`D491
`
`Exhibit 178, Valencia‘ vs. Claims of the ‘211 Patent’
`
`Exhibit 179, Valencia‘ vs. Claims of the 504 Patent’
`
`D493
`
`Exhibit 180, RFC 2401 in Combination with U.S. Patent No. 6,496,867‘ vs. Claims of the ‘180
`Paten
`
`D494
`
`Exhibit 131, Davison‘ vs. Claims of the '135 Patent’
`
`Exhibit 182, Davison' vs. Claims of the ‘151 Patent’
`
`D496
`
`Exhibit 183, Davison' vs. Claims of the ‘180 Patent’
`
`D497
`
`Exhibit 134, Davison' vs. Claims of the ‘211 Patent’
`
`D498
`
`Exhibit 185, Davison' vs. Claims of the ‘504 Patent’
`
`D499
`
`Exhibit 186, Davison‘ vs. Claims of the '759 Patent’
`
`Exhibit 187, AutoSOCKS V2.1‘ vs. Claims of the '135 Patentz
`
`Exhibit 133, AutoSOCKS v2.1‘ vs. Claims of the ‘151 Patent’
`
`
`
`
`
`./Kl‘iSl1a Lim/’
`Q“/_g0/201 2
`/K.L./
`ALL REFERENCES COi\ESiDEREE EXCEPT WHERE LiNE/D THRQUGH.
`Petitioner Apple Inc. — Exhibit 1002, p. 1295
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. - Exhibit 1002, p. 1295
`
`

`
`
`" :2;
`Subst. for form 1449lPTO
`Complete if Kn "
`
`
`Application Number
`1 23/336,790
`
`F‘""9 Dale
`Firswamed
`Arwnit jam
`examiner~ame
`Docket Number
`
`
`
`
`
`M Exhibit 189, AutoSOCKS v2.1 Administrator’s Guide‘ vs. Claims of the ‘180 Patentz
`- D503
`Exhibit 190, AutoSOCKS' vs. Claims of the ‘759 Patent?
`- D504
`Exhibit 191, Aventail Connect 3.01/2.51‘ vs. Claims of the ‘135 Patentz
`W Exhibit 192. Aventail Connect v3.01/2.51‘ vs. Claims of the -151 Patent’
`-M Exhibit 193, Aventail Connect 3.01/2.51‘ vs. Claims of the ‘180 Patent?
`- D507
`Exhibit 194, Aventail Connect 3.01/2.51‘ vs. Claims ofthe ‘759 Patentz
`
`-
`-
`
`D508
`
`Exhibit 195. Aventail Connect 3.1/2.6 Administrator’s Guide‘ vs. Claims of the ‘135 Patentz
`
`-W Exhibit 196, Aventail Connect 3.1/2.6 Administrator’s Guide’ vs. Claims of the '151 Patentz -
`- Exhibit 197, Aventail Connect 3.1/2.6‘ vs. Claims of the ‘180 Patentz
`-
`E Exhibit 198, Aventail Connect 3.1/2.6‘ vs. Claims of the ‘759 Patentz
`Exhibit2199, BinGO! User’s User’s Guide/Extended Features Reference‘ vs. Claims of the '151
`Patent
`
`D513
`
`Exhibitt2200, BinGO! User’s User’s Guide/Extended Features Reference‘ vs. Claims of the ‘135
`Paten
`
`D514
`
`Exhibit 201, BinGO! vs. Claims ofthe ‘180 Patentz
`Exhibit 202. BinGO! vs. Claims of the ‘759 Patentz
`
`-
`-
`
`Exhibit 203, Broadband Forum Technical Report TR-025 (Issue 1.0/5.0)‘ vs. Claims of the ‘135
`Patentz
`
`Exhibit 204, Domain Name System (DNS) Security‘ vs. Claims of the '211 Patent’
`- D517
`W Exhibit 205. Domain Name System (DNS) Security‘ vs. Claims of the ‘504 Patentz
`
`
`
`D519
`
`Exhibit 206, RFC 2230, Key Exchange Delegation Record for the DNS‘ vs. Claims of the '211
`Patentz
`
`Exhibit 207. RFC 2230. Key Exchange Delegation Record for the DNS' vs. Claims of the ‘504
`Patent2
`
`-H Exhibit 208.2RFC 2538, Storing Certificates inthe Domain Name System (DNS)' vs. Claims ofthe -
`
`'211 Patent
`
`
`
`Exhibit 209, RFC 2538, Storing Certificates in the Domain Name System (DNS)' vs. Claims of the
`'5o4 Patent?
`
`
`Exhibit 210, IETF RFC 2065: Domain Name System Security Extensions; Published January 1997‘ -
`
`vs. Claims of the ‘504 Patent’
`
`
`
`
`/Ki‘isi‘ia Limi’
`
`07'/20/2012
`
`ALL REFERENCES CQi\ESiDEREi3 EXCEPT WHERE LiE\iED THRQUGH.
`
`/K.L./
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. — Exhibit 1002, p. 1296
`
`
`
`77580-151(VRNK-0001CP3CNFT1)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`INFORMATION DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
`
`BY APPLICANT
`
`
`
`(Use as many sheets as necessary)
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. - Exhibit 1002, p. 1296
`
`

`
`
`
`Subst. for form 1449lPTO
`
`INFORMATION DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
`BY APPLICANT
`(Use as many sheets as necessary)
`
`
`
`
`
`‘E
`
`
`Complete if Kn
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`'
`:--—
`
`Exhibit 211, IETF RFC 2065: Domain Name System Security Extensions; Published January 1997'
`vs. Claims of the '211 Patent’
`
`L2TP"' vs. Claims of the '135 Patentz
`Exhibit 212, RFC 2486, RFC 2661, RFC 2401, and Internet-Draft, “Secure Remote Access with
` Exhibit 213, U.S. Patent No. 7,100,195 in Combination with RFC 2401 and U.S. Patent No.
`
`
`
`
`
`6,496,867‘ vs. Claims of the ‘135 Patent’
`
` Exhibitt2217, U.S. Patent No. 6,496,867 in Combination with RFC 2401' vs. Claims of the ‘151
`
`
`Paten
`
`
`
`D531
`
`Exhibitt2218, U.S. Patent No. 6,496,867 in Combination with RFC 2401' vs. Claims of the ‘135
`
`Paten
`
`D532
`
`Exhibit219, U.S. Patent No. 6,496,867‘ vs. Claims of the ‘211 Patent:
`
`D533
`
`Exhibit 22o, u.s. Patent No. 6,496,867‘ vs. Claims of the 504 Patent’
`
`D534
`
`Exhibit 221, RFC 2486, RFC 2661, RFC 2401, and Internet-Draft. “Secure Remote Access with
`
`L2TP"‘ vs. Claims of the ‘151 Patentz
`Exhibit 222, U.S. Patent No. 6,557,037‘ vs. Claims of the '211 Patent’
`Exhibit 223. U.S. Patent No. 6,557,037‘ vs. Claims of the '504 Patentz
`
`- D535
`D536
`
`
`
`D537
`
`Exhibitt2224, RFC 2230, Key Exchange Delegation Record for the DNS‘ vs. Claims of the '135
`Paten
`
`D538
`
`Exhibitt2225, RFC 2230. Key Exchange Delegation Record for the DNS‘ vs. Claims of the ‘151
`Paten
`
`D539
`Exhibit Cisco-1. Cisco’s Prior Art Systems‘ vs. Claims of the '135 Patent
`W Exhibit Cisco-2, Cisco's Prior Art Systems‘ vs. Claims ofthe ‘151 Patent
`M Exhibit Cisco-3, Cisco's Prior Art Systems‘ vs. Claims of the ‘18O Patent
`Exhibit Cisco—4, Cisco's Prior Art Systems‘ vs. Claims ofthe '211 Patent
`Exhibit Cisco-5, Cisco's Prior Art Systems‘ vs. Claims of the '504 Patent
`.
`Exhibit Cisco-6, Cisco's Prior Art Systems‘ vs. Claims ofthe ‘759 Patent
`Exhibit Cisco-7, Cisco's Prior Art PIX System‘ vs. Claims ofthe ‘759 Patent
`
`D543
`
`
`
`/Krisna Lim/’
`
`O7/20/2012
`
`ALL REFERENCES COI\ISiDEREIL‘é EXCEPT WHERE IJNED THRQUGH.
`
`/K.I.../
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. — Exhibit 1002, p. 1297
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. - Exhibit 1002, p. 1297
`
`

`
`
`
`
`
`‘E
`
`
`
`Subst. for form 1449/PTO
`
`comp|ete if Kngw
`
`
`
`
`
`INFORMATION DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
`
`BY APPLICANT
`(Use as many sheets as necessary)
`
`
`
`--
`Exhibit A: Copy of U.S. Patent No. 6,502,135
`
`0547
`
`Exhibit A: Copy of U.S. Patent No. 7,490,151
`
`D548
`
`Exhibit B: Certificate of Service to Request For Inter Partes Reexamination Under 35 U.S.C. § 311
`(Patent No. 6,502,135)
`
`
`
`Exhibit B: Certificate of Service to Request For Inter Partes Reexamination Under 35 U.S.C. § 311
`(Patent No. 7,490,151)
`
`D557
`
`Exhibit C-2: Provisional Application 60/106,261
`
`Exhibit C4: Claim Chart Beser (Patent No. 7,490,151)
`
`D563
`
`Exhibit C5: Claim Chart Beser (Patent No. 6,502,135)
`
`Exhibit C5: Claim Chart Wang (Patent No. 7,490,151)
`
`Exhibit C6: Claim Chart BinGO (Patent No. 6,502,135)
`
`Exhibit D: Memorandum Opinion in vimetx v. Microsoft.
`
`-
`
`
`
`Exhibit D-10: D.E. Denning and G.M. Sacco, “Time-stamps in Key Distribution Protocols,”
`Communications of the ACM, Vol. 24, N.8. pp. 533-536. August 1981.
`
`
`
`Exhibit D-11: C.l. Dalton and J.F. Griffin, “Applying Military Grade Security to the lntemet,”
`Proceedings of the 8th Joint European Networking Conference (JENC 8). (May 12-15 1997).
`
`
`
`
`Exhibit D-1: Takahiro Kiuchi and Shigekoto Kaihara, “C-HTTP — The Development of a Secure,
`Closed HPPT-Based Network on the Internet,” Published in the Proceedings of SNDSS 1996.
`
`
`
`D567
`
`
`
`./Krisna Lim,’
`
`07,/20/2012
`
`ALL REFERENCES CQi\ESiDEREE3 EXCEPT WHERE UNED THRQUGH.
`
`/K.L./
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. — Exhibit 1002, p. 1298
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. - Exhibit 1002, p. 1298
`
`

`
`VVV'.'.~'
`
`
`
`Victor Larson
`
`Krisna Lim
`
`BY APPLICANT
`(Use as many sheets as necessary)
`
`
`
`Exhibit D-12: Steven M. Bellovin and Michael Merritt. “Encrypted Key Exchange: Password-Based
`protocols Secure against Dictionary Attacks," 1992 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy
`(1992).
`
`
`Subst. for fonn 1449/PTO
`Complete if Known
`
`1 23/336,790
`
`
`
`
`
`INFORMATION DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
`
`
`
`Examiner Name
`
`‘
`
`D570
`
`UU1‘I
`
`Exhibit D-2: Copy of U.S. Pat. No. 5,898,830
`
`Q).5
`
`D572
`
`D57
`
`
`
`Exhibit D-3: Eduardo Solana and Jiirgen Harms, “Flexible Internet Secure Transactions Based on
`Collaborative Domains,", Security Protocols Workshop 1997, pp. 37-51.
`
`
`
`Exhibit D-4: Copy of U.S. Pat. No. 6,119,234
`
`D575
`
`D574
`
`Exhibit D-5: Jeff Sedayao, “Mosaic Will Kill My Network!’ — Studying Network Traffic Patterns of
`Mosaic Use,” in Electron. Proc. 2nd World Wide Web Conf.'94: Mosaic and the Web, Chicago, IL,
`
`
`Oct. 1994.
`
`
`
`
`Exhibit D-6: M. Luby Juels and R. Ostrovsky, “Security of Blind Digital Signatures," Crypto '97,
`LNCS 1294, pages 150-164, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1997.
`
`
`Exhibit D—8: David M. Martin, "A Framework for Local Anonymity in the lntemet,” Technical Report.
` D576
`Boston University, Boston, MA, USA (Feb 21, 1998).
`
`D577
`
`Exhibit D-9: Copy of U.S. Pat. No. 7,764,231
`
`Exhibit E3: Declaration of James Chester (Patent No. 6,502,135)
`
`D535
`
`Exhibit E3: Declaration of James Chester (Patent No. 7,490,151)
`
`D537
`
`Exhibit E-4: Claim Charts Applying Aziz and Other References to Claims of the ‘135 Patent.
`
`D588
`
`Exhibit X1: Aventail Connect Administrators Guide v3.1/v2.6., PP 1-20 (1996-1999)
`
`D539
`
`ExhibitX10: Copy of U.S. Patent No. 4,885,778
`
`Exhibit X11: Copy of U.S. Patent No. 6,615,357
`
`Exhibit X2: Aventail Connect Administrators Guide v3.01/v2.51., PP 1-116 (1996-1999)
`
`Exhibit X3: Aventail AutoSOCKS Administration & Users Guide v2.1 ., PP 1-70 (1996-1999)
`
`
` Exhibit X4: Reed et aI., "Proxies for Anonymous Routine," 12th Annuary Computer Security
`
`
`
`D593
`
`Applications Conference, San Diego, CA, December -9-13, pp 1-10 (1996).
`
`/Krisna Lim/'
`
`'
`
`O7/20/'2012
`
`ALL REFERENCES CQi\ESiDEEEE3 EXCEPT WHERE UNED THRQUGH.
`
`/K.L./
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. — Exhibit 1002, p. 1299
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. - Exhibit 1002, p. 1299
`
`

`
`
` Subst. for form 1449/PTO
`
`
`
`INFORMATION DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
`
`
`
`BY APPLICANT
`(Use as many sheets as necessary)
`
`D594
`
`Exhibit X5: Wang, The Broadband Forum Technical Report, "TR-O25 — Core Network Architecture
`Recommendations for Access to Legacy Data Networks over ADSL,' Issue 1.0; pp. 1-24 , v1.0
`(1999).
`
`Docket Number
`
`77580-1 51 (VRNK-0001 CPSCNFT1)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Firs‘ Named '""°"'°'
`A" U"“ ‘T
`
` Examiner
`
`
`
`
`
`Exhibit X6: Copy of U.S. Patent No. 6,496,867
`
`Exhibit X7: BinGO! User’s Guide Incorporating by Reference BinGO! Extended Feature Reference. -
`
`D597
`
`Exhibit X7: Kent et al.. “Security Architecture for the lntemet Protocol, " Network Working Group
`Request for Comments (RFC) 2401, pp 1-70 (1998).
`
`
`
`-
`-
`
`-
`
`
`Exhibit X8: Copy of u.s. Patent No. 6,182,141
`D598
`-W Exhibit x9: BinGO! User’s Guide v1.6(1999).
`
`' 0600
`Exhibit Y1: Aventail Extranet Server 3.0 Administrator’s Guide.
`
`
`Exhibit Y10: Hanks, S., et al., RFC1701, "Generic Routing Encapsulation (GRE)," 1994, is
`Accessbile at http://www.ietf.org/rfclrfc1701.txt.
`
`
`
`
`
` Exhibit Y11: Simpson, W., RFC1994, "PPP Challenge Handshake Authentication Protocol (CHAP),"
`1996, http://www.ietf.org/rdclrfc1994.txt.
`
`
`
` Protocol Datagrams over Point-To-Point Links," 1990, Is Accessible at
`http:/lwww.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1 171 .txt.
`
`
`
`Exhibit Y13: Kummert, H., RFC 2420, “The PPP Triple-DES Encryption Protocol (3DESE),"
`September, 1998.
`
`
`
`
` Exhibit Y17: Srisuresh, P., RFC 2663, “IP Network Address Translator (NAT) Terminology and
`
`Considerations," August 1999.
`
`
`
`Exhibit Y18: Heinanen, J., RFC 1483. “Multiprotocol Encapsulation over ATM Adaptation Layer 5,"
`July 1993.
`
`
` Exhibit Y4: Ferguson, P. and Huston, G., “What is a VPN", The Internet Protocol Journal, Vol 1.,
`
`
`No. 1 (June 1998 (“Ferguson”).
`
`Exhibit Y5: Mockapetris, P., RFC 1034, “Domain Names — Concepts and Facilities,” November
`1987 (“RFC1034").
`
`
`
`/Krisna Lim/’
`
`07/20/2012
`
`ALL REFERENCES COi\ESiDERED EXCEPT WHERE UNED THRQUGH.
`
`/K.L./
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. — Exhibit 1002, p. 1300
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. - Exhibit 1002, p. 1300
`
`

`
`INFORMATION DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
`BY APPLICANT
`(Use as many sheets as necessary)
`
`
`
`Subst. for form 1449/PTO
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Application Number
`
`Filing Date
`First Named Inventor
`
`Art Unit
`
`Examiner Name
`
`Comp|ete if Known
`13I336,790
`
`
`
`Victor Larson
`
`Krisna Lim
`
`Docket Number
`
`77580-151(VRNK-0001CP3CNFT1)
`
`Exhibit Y6: Mockapetris. P.. RFC 1035, “Domain Names - Implementation and Specification,“
`November 1987 ("RFC1035").
`
`Exhibit Y8: Fielding, R., et al., RFC 2068. “Hypertext Transfer Protocol - HTTP/1.1," January 1997.
`
`Exhibit Y8: Woodbum, R.A., et al., RFC1241, “A Scheme for an Internet Encapsulation Protocol:
`Version 1,“ 1991.
`
`Exhibit Y9: Leech, M., et aI., RFC 1928, "Socks Protocol Version 5,” March 1996.
`
`
`
`Transmittal Letter (Patent No 7 490 151)
`
`Joint Claim Construction and Prehearing Statement
`
`Exhibit A: Agreed Upon Terms; P R 4-3 Joint Claims Constmction and Preheanng Statement
`
`Exhibit B: Disputed Claim Terms; P.R. 4-3 Joint Claim Construction and Prehearing Statement
`
`Exhibit C; VirnetX's Proposed Construction of Claim Terms and Supporting Evidence
`
`Exhibit D; Defendants’ Intrinsic and Extrinsic Support; P.R. 4-3 Joint Claim Construction and
`Prehearing Statement
`
`
`
`File History of U.S. Patent 6,839,759
`
`
`
`
`Exhibit B-4; VirnetX. Inc. v. Microsoft Corp., Case No. 6107-(N-80, Microsoft's Motion for Partial
`
`Summary Judgment of Invalidity of U.S. Patent No. 6,839,759 (E.D. Tex. Dec. 18, 2009)
`Exhibit D-2; Kent et al., “Security Architecture for the Internet Protocol,‘ Internet Engineering Task
`Force, Internet Draft, (Feb. 1998)
`
`
`D539
`Exhibit D-3; Aziz et aI., U.S. Patent 5,548,646 to Aziz et al., “System for Signatureless Transmission
`and Reception of Data Packets Between Computer Networks,” Filed Sept. 15, 1994 and issued Aug.
`
`
`
`
`20, 1996
`
`/Kris-na Lim/’
`
`07"?”-"291 2
`
`ALL REFERENCES CQi\ESiDEEEE EXCEPT WHERE UNED THRQUGH.
`
`/K.L./
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. — Exhibit 1002, p. 1301
`
`D517
`
`D513
`
`D623
`
`D535
`
`D531
`
`D532
`
`D533
`
`D534
`
`D535
`
`D535
`
`D537
`
`D638
`
`Exhibit Y9: Simpson, W., RFC1853, '‘IP in IP Tunneling,” 1995, Is Accessible at
`http://ww.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1583.txt.
`
`
`
`Form PTOISB/42, Listing Each Patent and Printed Publication Relied Upon to Provide a Substantial
`New Question of Patentability (Patent No. 6,502,135)
`
`
`Form PTO/SBl42, Listing Each Patent and Printed Publication Relied Upon to Provide a Substantial
`New Question of Patentability (Patent No. 7,490,151)
`
`
`
`
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. - Exhibit 1002, p. 1301
`
`

`
`
` Subst. for fonn 1449/PTO
`
`
`
`
`
`INFORMATION DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
`
`
`
`BY APPLICANT
`(Use as many sheets as necessary)
`
`
`:_
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Exhibit D-4; Yinger; U.S. Patent 5,960,204 to Yinger et al.. “System and Method for Installing
`Applications on a Computer on an as needed basis, Filed on October 28. 1996 and Issued
`September 28, 1999
`
`Exhibit D-8; Barlow; U.S. Patent 5,204,961 to Barlow. "Computer Network Operating with Multilevel
`Hierarchical Security with Selectable Common Trust Realms and Corresponding Security
`Protocols,” Filed on June 25, 1990 and Issued April 20. 1993
`
`Exhibit D-12; RFC 1122, Braden, “Requirements for Internet Hosts - Communication Layers." RFC
`1122 (Oct. 1989)
`
`Exhibit D-13; RFC 791; Information Sciences Institute, “lntemet Protocol,” DARPA Internet Program
`Specification RFC 791 (Sept. 1981)
`
`Exhibit D-14; Caronni et al., “SKIP — Securing the Internet.‘ 5th International Workshops on
`Enabling Technologies: Infrastructure for Collaborative Enterprises (WET ICE '96) (June 19-21.
`1996)
`
`Exhibit D-15; Maughan et al., “Internet Security Association and Key Management Protocol
`(ISAKMP). " IPSEC Work Group Draft (July 26, 1997)
`
`D646
`
`D644
`
`Exhibit E-1; Claim Charts Applying Kiuchi as a Primary Reference to the ‘759 Patent.
`Exhibit E-2; Claim Charts Applying Kent as a Primary Reference to the ‘759 Patent
`- Exhibit E-3; Claim Charts Applying Aziz as a Primary Reference to the ‘759 Patent
`
`D649
`
`Exhibit E-4; Claim Charts Applying Kent in view of Caronni as a Primary Combination of References
`to the ‘759 Patent
`
`Exhibit D-5; Edwards et al.. “High Security Web Servers and Gateways.” Computer Networks and ISDN System 29. pages 927-938 (Sept. 1997)
`E Exhibit 0-10; Lee et ai., “Hypertext Transfer Protocol — HTTP/1.0," RFC 1945 (May 1996) -
`
`Exhibit E-3; Claim Charts Applying Blum to Claims of the '151 Patent
`
`Exhibit B-1, File History of U.S. Patent 7,490,151
`
`
`Exhibit E—1, Claim Charts Applying Kiuchi. and Kiuchi and Martin to Claims of the '151 Patent -
`
`Exhibit E-2, Claim Charts Applying Wesinger. and Wesinger and Martin to Claims of the ‘151 Patent
`
`Exhibit E-4, Claim Charts Applying Aziz and Edwards, and Aziz, Edwards. and Martin to Claims of
`the '1 51 Patent
`
`Exhibit E-6, Claim Charts Applying Wesinger and Edwards, and Wesinger, Edwards. and Martin to
`Claims of the ‘151 Patent
`
`Virnetx Inc., V. Mitel Networks Corp.; Defendants’ Joint Invalidity Contentions ‘ E Exhibit 37, RFC 2661 ‘ vs. Claims ofthe '13s Patent 2
`
`D660
`
`Exhibit 38. RFC 2661‘ vs. Claims of the *211 Patent 2
`
`
`
`E Exhibit 39, RFC 2661‘ vs. Claims of the 604 Patent 2
`
`@ Exhibit 40, SecureConnect' vs. Claims of the ‘135 Patent 2
`
`
`
`
`-
`
`-
`
`O7/20/2012
`/Krisna Lim/’
`ALL REFERENCES COl\ESiDEEEE3 EXCEPT WHERE UNED THROUGH.
`
`/K.E.../
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. — Exhibit 1002, p. 1302
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. - Exhibit 1002, p. 1302
`
`

`
`
`
`'
`
`W335-79°
`
`‘
`
`
`
`victor Larson
`
`Subst. for form 1449/PTO
`
`
`compiete if
`
`Filing Date
`First Named Inventor
`
`Art Unit
`
`
`
`
`
`INFORMATION DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
`
`BY APPLICANT
`(Use as many sheets as necessary)
`
`
`
`- D676
`D671
`
`D672
`
`- 0673
`- D674
`0675
`
`Exhibit 48. us teas‘ vs. Claims of the ‘504 Patent’
`Exhibit 49, Chuah‘ vs. Claims of the ‘135 Patent 2
`
`Exhibit 50, chuah‘ vs. Claims of the ‘211 Patent 2
`
`Exhibit 51. Chuah' vs. Claims of the ‘504 Patent’
`Exhibit 52, u.s. ‘648' vs. Claims of the ‘135 Patent’
`
`Exhibit 53, U.S. '648' vs. Claims of the ‘211 Patent 2
`
`Exhibit 57. B8iM vPNs‘ vs. Claims of the ‘504 Patent 2
`‘ D676
`Exhibit 58. BorderManager' vs. Claims ofthe ‘135 Patent 2
`- 9677
`- Exhibit 59, BorderManager' vs. Claims of the ‘211 Patent 2
`
`
`
`
`
`--
`
`-
`Exhibit 61, Prestige 128 Pius‘ vs. Claims of the ‘135 Patent 2
`-I
`--
`-2
`-2
`-=
`- Exhibit 67, US ‘on’ vs. Claims of the ‘135 Patent 2
`-
`--
`-
`_
`D666
`Exhibit 69, RFC 2436‘ vs. Claims of the 504 Patent 2
`
`-
`
`—
`‘
`
`
`
`/Krisna Lam/'
`
`07/20/020i 2
`
`ALL REFERENCES CQi\ESiDEEEE3 EXCEPT WHERE LiE\iED THEQUGH. /KL./'
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. — Exhibit 1002, p. 1303
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`--
`-2
`-@-
`-2
`--
`- Exhibit 46. us ‘B83’ vs. Claims of the ‘135 Patent 2
`D669
`Exhibit 47, US ‘883' vs. Claims of the ‘211 Patent 2
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. - Exhibit 1002, p. 1303
`
`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`Subst. for fonn 1449IPTO
`
`
`INFORMATION DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
`
`BY APPLICANT
`(Use as many sheets as necessary)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Complete if Known
`
`Omi-
`
`OT
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`——
`D689
`Exhibit 70 Understanding lPSec' vs. Claims of the '135 Patent 2
`
`D000
`
`Exhibit 71, Understanding ipsec‘ vs. Claims of the ‘211 Patent 2
`
`M Exhibit 72, Understanding ipsec‘ vs. Claims of the ‘504 Patent 2
`
`Exhibit 73. us 320‘ vs. Claims of the '135 Patent 2
`
`D593
`
`Exhibit 74, US ‘820' vs. Claims of the ‘211 Patent 2
`
`D694
`
`Exhibit 75, US '820‘ vs. Claims of the ‘504 Patent 2
`
`Exhibit 76, us me‘ vs. Claims of the ‘211 Patent 2
`
`D696
`
`Exhibit 77, US ‘019' vs. Claims of the ‘504 Patent 2
`
`D697
`
`Exhibit 78. US ‘G491 vs. Claims of the '135 Patent 2
`
`D693
`
`Exhibit 79, US ‘G491 vs. Claims of the ‘211 Patent 2
`
`D000
`
`Exhibit 80, us me‘ vs. Claims of the 504 Patent 2
`
`D700
`
`Exhibit 81, us 748‘ vs. Claims of the '135 Patent 2
`
`D701
`
`Exhibit 82, us ‘Z611 vs. Claims of the '135 Patent 2
`
`0702
`
`Exhibit 33, us 261‘ vs. Claims of the ‘211 Patent 2
`
`D703
`
`Exhibit 84, us ‘Z61’ vs. Claims of the ‘504 Patent 2
`
`D704
`
`Exhibit 85. us 900‘ vs. Claims of the '135 Patent 2
`
`D705
`
`Exhibit 86, us 900‘ vs. Claims of the ‘211 Patent 2
`
`D700
`
`Exhibit 87, us 900‘ vs. Claims of the -504 Patent 2
`
`D707
`
`Exhibit 88, us '671‘ vs. Claims of the '135 Patent 2
`
`D703
`
`Exhibit 89, US '671‘ vs. Claims of the ‘211 Patent 2
`
`D700
`
`Exhibit 90, us 671‘ vs. Claims of the ‘504 Patent 2
`
`D710
`
`Exhibit 91. JP ‘704' vs. Claims of the '135 Patent 2
`
`0I
`
`1
`
`Exhibit 92, JP 704‘ vs. Claims of the ‘211 Patent 2
`
`D712
`
`Exhibit 93, JP '704‘ vs. Claims of the ‘504 Patent 2
`
`D713
`
`Exhibit 94, GB '841‘ vs. Claims of the '135 Patent 2
`
`Exhibit 95. GB '841‘ vs. Claims of the ‘211 Patent 2
`D714
`
`
`/Krisna Lim/
`
`07/20/'20‘i2
`
`ALL REFERENCES CQi\ESiDEREi3 EXCEPT WHERE Lii\iED THRQUGH.
`
`/K.L./
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. — Exhibit 1002, p. 1304
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. - Exhibit 1002, p. 1304
`
`

`
`.
`
`
`vi-1-I.-!~'
`v
`...x. 7 L3.
`..
`“ ‘.'
`.
`
`
`
`Complete if Known
`wsss.vso
`
`Filing Date
`First Named Inventor
`
`Art Unit
`
`victor Larson
`
`
`
` Subst. for form 1449/PTO
`
`
`
`INFORMATION DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
`
`BY APPLICANT
`(Use as many sheets as necessary)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`-—-- "5‘°"5“""""*’°°‘°"3°"""
`0715
`Exhibit 96, GB ‘841‘vs. Claims of the ‘504 Patent 2
`
`0716
`
`Exhibit 97, US ‘318‘ vs. Claims of the ‘135 Patent 2
`
`- 0717
`
`Exhibit 93, us 313‘ vs. Claims ofthe ‘211 Patent’
`
`----
`
`
`
`' - D727 _ Exhibit 112, |ntraPort System'vs. Claims ofthe'135 Patent’
`0728
`Exhibit 115, lntraPort System1vs. Claims of the '21 1_ Patent 2
`
`D729
`
`Exhibit 116, |ntraPort System‘ vs. Claims of the ‘504 Patent 2
`
`- D730
`- 0731
`D732
`
`Exhibit 113, Aitiga VPN system‘ vs. Claims of the ‘135 Patent 2
`Exhibit 121, Altiga VPN system‘ vs. Claims of the '211 Patent 2
`Exhibit 122, Aitiga VPN System‘ vs. Claims of the ‘504 Patent 2
`
`0733
`
`Exhibit 124, Kiuchi1 vs. Claims of the ‘135 Patent 2
`
`
`
`_-2I-I-
`
`
`
`D738
`
`Exhibit 140, Schulzrinne‘ vs. Claims of the *211 Patent 2
`
`D739
`
`Exhibit 141, Schulzrinne‘ vs. Claims of the ‘504 Patent 2
`
`D740
`
`Exhibit 143, soiana‘ vs. Claims of the ‘135 Patent 2
`
`
`
`/Krisna Lim/'
`
`07/20/2012
`
`ALL REFERENCES COi\ESiDEREE3 EXCEPT WHERE UNED THRQUGH.
`
`/K.E.../
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. — Exhibit 1002, p. 1305
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. - Exhibit 1002, p. 1305
`
`

`
`compmte if KDD
`Application Number
`13/336,790
`“"9 Dale
`First Named lnventor
`Victor Larson
`
` " :2;
`
`Subst. for form 1449IPTO
`
`INFORMATION DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`BY APPLICANT
`(Use as many sheets as necessary)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`A" U"“ :_
`E*a'“‘"°' Name
`Docket Number
`Exhibit 146 sorana‘ vs. Claims of the ‘211 Patent 2
`
`77580-151(VRNK-0001CP3CNFT1)
`
`D741
`
`D742
`
`Exhibit 147 Solana‘ vs. Claims of the ‘504 Patent 2
`
`5743
`
`u
`2
`Exhibit 155 Manno‘ vs. Claims of the ‘135 Patent
`-
`1
`
`2
`
`-
`
`1
`
`.
`
`1
`
`.
`
`D750
`
`D751
`
`D752
`
`D753
`
`5’.3’:
`
`.
`1
`.
`Exhibit 178 Valencia vs Claims of the ‘211 Patent2
`.
`1
`.
`Exhibit 179 Valencia vs Claims of the ‘504 Patent2
`
`Exhibit181 Davison' vs. Claims of the ‘135 Patent2
`.
`1
`.
`Exhibit184 Davrson vs C|armsofthe‘211Patent2
`.
`1
`.
`Exhibit 185 Davrson vs Claims of the ‘504 Patent2
`
`D755
`
`Exhibit 200 BrnGO' User's Guide/Extended Features Reference‘ vs. Claims of the ‘135 Patent 2
`
`D755
`
`Exhibit 1203, Broadband Forum Technical Report TR-O25 (Issue 1.0/5.0)‘ vs. Claims of the ‘135
`Patent
`
`D757
`
`D755
`
`D759
`
`D750
`
`D751
`
`D762
`
`D753
`
`Exhibit 206, RFC 2230. Key Exchange Delegation Record for the DNS' vs. Claims of the ‘211
`Patent 2
`
`Exhibit 207, RFC 2230, Key Exchange Delegation Record for the DNS' vs. Claims of the ‘504
`Patent 2
`
`Exhibit 208, RFC 2538. Storing Certificates in the Domain Name System (DNS)' vs. Claims of the
`‘211 Patent 2
`
`Exhibit 209. RFC 2538, Storing Certificates in the Domain Name System (DNS)' vs. Claims of the
`‘504 Patent 2
`
`Exhibit 212, RFC 2486, RFC 2661, RFC 2401 and Intemet-Draft, "Secure Remote Access with
`vs. Claims of the ‘135 Patent 2
`
`2Exhibit 218, U.S. Patent No. 6,496,867 in combination with RFC 2401" vs. Claims of the ‘135 Patent
`
`Exhibit 219, U.S. Patent No. 6.496.867‘ vs. Claims of the ‘211 Patent 2
`
`D754
`
`Exhibit 220, U.S. Patent No. 6,496,867‘ vs. Claims of the ‘504 Patent 2
`
`D755
`
`Exhibit 222, U.S. Patent No. 6,557,037‘ vs. Claims of the ‘211 Patent 2
`
`07/20,/2012
`/Krlsna Llm./’
`ALL REFERENCES COI\ISiDEEEI3 EXCEPT WHERE IJNED THEQUGH.
`
`/K.I.../
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. — Exhibit 1002, p. 1306
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. - Exhibit 1002, p. 1306
`
`

`
`
`
`D767
`
`——2— °°°*°‘”“"‘*’°'
`Exhibit 223. U.S. Patent No. 6,557,037‘ vs. Claims of the ‘504 Patent 2
`D766
`
`Exhibit2224, RFC 2230, Key Exchange Delegation Record for the DNS‘ vs. Claims of the ‘135
`Patent
`
`Subst. for form 1449/PTO
`INFORMATION DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
`av APPLICANT
`(Use as many sheets as necessary)
`
`‘"3 -.
`
`25
`
`Application Number
`
`Filing Date
`First Named Inventor
`
`Art Unit
`
`Examiner Name
`
`‘3'33°"°°
`Victor Larson
`
`Krisna Lim
`
`77580-151(VRNK-0001CP3CNFT1)
`
`
`
`
`
`D768
`
`Exhibit 228. u.s. 588‘ vs. Claims of the '21 1 Patent 2 (Final)
`
`D769
`
`Exhibit 229, U.S. 588‘ vs. Claims of the ‘504 Patent