throbber
Petition for Inter Partes Revievv ofU.S. Patent Nos. 8,868,705 and 8,850,009&%
`
`The following three steps are identical to standard WinScck communications
`steps described above; however. nested inside them are additional actions and
`options introduced by Aventail Connect.
`
`218.
`
`I explain each of these steps in detail below, but first provide a
`
`flowchart that I prepared illustrating these steps:
`
`Client wishes to establish
`cornrnunicat on channel with
`destiraticn
`
`Does client know
`hostnarne or IP
`address?
`
`Send DNS lockup
`lntercepted by Aventai
`
`Connect: IS hostname on
` Local Lcokup table7
`request to TCPIIP
`
`stack
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Retum IP address
`from local lockup
`
`
`.
`IP Address
`Perform conventional
`
`DNS lockup,
`
`returning lP address
`
`
`Yes
`
`Create and return
`“false” DNS entry
`
`
`match redirection
`
`rLIe.7
`
`
`
`Request connection, using
`lP address
`
`Create and return
`“false" DNS entry
`
`Ye
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Send hostname to Aventail
`E><traNet server for resolufi on
`
`
`
`Establish VPN connection
`
`via Aventail ExtraNet
`Server to access resource
`
`
`
`
`No
`
`Does address match
`redirection rule?
`
`
`
`‘
`
`
`
`Conventional TCP/IP
`
`stackwill ha-idle creating
`connection and
`communications
`
`
`
`O
`
`Page 1 of 2
`
`VIRNETX EXHIBIT 2014
`
`Apple v. VirnetX
`Trial lPR2015-00810,-00811, -oos12
`
`89
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. - Exhibit 1005
`
`VIRNETX EXHIBIT 2021
`
`Apple V. VimetX
`Trial IPR2015-00871
`
`intercepted by Aventail
`Connect:
`
`“false" address
`
`
`VIRNETX EXHIBIT 2021
`Apple v. VirnetX
`Trial IPR2015-00871
`
`Page 1 of 2
`
`

`
`Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Patent Nos. 8,868,705 and 8,850,009
`
`Ex. 1009 (ACAG) at 9.
`
`215. Because the Aventail Connect software sits between the application
`
`running on the computer and the TCP/IP stack, Aventail Connect can evaluate,
`
`route, and encrypt any communications that make use of TCP/IP. See Ex. 1009
`
`(ACAG) at 10:
`
`When the Aventail Connect LSP receives a connection request, it determines
`whether or not the connection needs to be redirected (to an Aventail ExtraNet
`Server) and/or encrypted (in SSL).
`
`216. Aventail Connect can therefore work with (any application running on
`
`Windows that makes use of the TCP/IP protocol, such as web browsers and email
`
`programs. See, e. g., Ex. 1009 (ACAG) at 8:
`
`Windows TCP/1P networking applications (such as telnet, e-mail, Web browsers,
`and ftp) use Winsock (Windows Sockets) to gain access to networks or the
`Internet. Winsock is the core component of TCP/IP under Windows, and is the
`interface that most Windows applications use to communicate to TCPIIP.
`
`See also Ex. 1031 gWindows NT for Dummies) at 14.
`
`217. As Aventail explains, the same three basic steps described above are
`
`still performed when Aventail Connect is running, but Aventail Connect modifies
`
`each of these steps in order to proxy certain network traffic to computers on a
`
`private network through the Aventail Extranet Server. See Ex. 1009 (ACAG) at
`
`11:
`
`Petitioner Apple Inc. — Exhibit 1005
`
`Page 2 of 2

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket