throbber
Paper No.
`Filed: April 7, 2015
`
`Naveen Modi
`Paul Hastings LLP
`875 15th Street NW
`Washington, DC 20005
`Telephone: (202) 551-1990
`Facsimile: (202) 551-0490
`E-mail: naveenmodi@paulhastings.com
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`APPLE INC.
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`VIRNETX INC.
`Patent Owner
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case IPR2015-00870
`Patent 8,560,705
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`PATENT OWNER’S MANDATORY NOTICES
`PURSUANT TO 37 C.F.R. § 42.8
`
`
`Filed on behalf of: VirnetX Inc.
`By:
`
`Joseph E. Palys
`Paul Hastings LLP
`875 15th Street NW
`Washington, DC 20005
`Telephone: (202) 551-1996
`Facsimile: (202) 551-0496
`E-mail: josephpalys@paulhastings.com
`
`
`
`

`
`Case IPR2015-00870
`Patent 8,560,705
`
`VirnetX Inc., the Patent Owner, provides the following mandatory notices
`
`pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.8.
`
`I.
`
`Real Party-in-Interest
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.8(b)(1), the real party-in-interest is VirnetX Inc.,
`
`the assignee of record for U.S. Patent No. 8,560,705 (“the ’705 patent”).
`
`II. Related Matters
`Patent Owner identifies the following matters that may be deemed related
`
`pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.8(b)(2).
`
`Proceedings Before the USPTO Involving the Patent-at-Issue
`
`A.
`The ’705 patent, which is the subject of this proceeding, is also at issue in
`
`inter partes review Case IPR2015-00871.
`
`Proceedings Before the USPTO Involving Related Patents
`
`B.
`Several patents stemming from the same applications that led to the ’705
`
`patent are or were at issue in the following inter partes review and inter partes
`
`reexamination proceedings:
`
`2
`
`

`
`Patent
`
`Matter
`
`Case IPR2015-00870
`Patent 8,560,705
`
`
`U.S. Patent No. 6,502,135
`
`Case IPR2013-003481
`
`Case IPR2013-003492
`
`Case IPR2013-003753
`
`Case IPR2014-001714
`
`Case IPR2014-001725
`
`Case IPR2014-005586
`
`Control No. 95/001,679
`
`Control No. 95/001,682
`
`
`1 The Board denied institution of this proceeding on December 13, 2013, and
`
`denied rehearing on February 12, 2014.
`
`2 The Board denied institution of this proceeding on December 13, 2013, and
`
`denied rehearing on February 12, 2014.
`
`3 The Board terminated this proceeding on November 12, 2013.
`
`4 The Board denied institution of this proceeding on June 5, 2014.
`
`5 The Board denied institution of this proceeding on June 5, 2014.
`
`6 The Board denied institution of this proceeding on July 23, 2014, and
`
`denied rehearing on September 5, 2014.
`
`3
`
`

`
`Patent
`
`Matter
`
`Case IPR2015-00870
`Patent 8,560,705
`
`
`Case IPR2013-003547
`
`Case IPR2013-003768
`
`Case IPR2014-001739
`
`U.S. Patent No. 7,490,151
`
`Case IPR2014-0061010
`
`Case IPR2015-0018711
`
`Control No. 95/001,697
`
`Control No. 95/001,714
`
`U.S. Patent No. 7,418,504
`
`Case IPR2013-0037712
`
`
`7 The Board denied institution of this proceeding on December 13, 2013, and
`
`denied rehearing on February 12, 2014.
`
`8 The Board terminated this proceeding on November 12, 2013.
`
`9 The Board denied institution of this proceeding on June 5, 2014.
`
`10 The Board terminated this proceeding on January 26, 2015.
`
`11 The Board denied institution of this proceeding on February 17, 2015.
`
`12 The Board terminated this proceeding on November 12, 2013.
`
`
`4
`
`

`
`Patent
`
`Matter
`
`Case IPR2015-00870
`Patent 8,560,705
`
`
`Case IPR2013-0039313
`
`Case IPR2013-0039414
`
`Case IPR2014-0017615
`
`Case IPR2014-0017716
`
`Case IPR2014-0061217
`
`Case IPR2014-0061318
`
`Case IPR2014-0061419
`
`
`13 The Board denied institution of this proceeding on December 18, 2013,
`
`and denied rehearing on February 12, 2014.
`
`14 The Board denied institution of this proceeding on December 18, 2013,
`
`and denied rehearing on February 12, 2014.
`
`15 The Board denied institution of this proceeding on June 5, 2014.
`
`16 The Board denied institution of this proceeding on June 5, 2014.
`
`17 The Board denied institution of this proceeding on October 15, 2014.
`
`18 On October 15, 2014, the Board consolidated this proceeding with
`
`IPR2014-00614 and then administratively terminated IPR2014-00613.
`
`19 The Board terminated this proceeding on January 26, 2015.
`
`5
`
`

`
`Patent
`
`Matter
`
`Case IPR2015-00870
`Patent 8,560,705
`
`
`Case IPR2015-0018820
`
`Case IPR2015-0018921
`
`Control No. 95/001,788
`
`Control No. 95/001,851
`
`
`20 The Board denied institution of this proceeding on February 17, 2015.
`
`21 The Board denied institution of this proceeding on February 17, 2015.
`
`6
`
`

`
`Patent
`
`Matter
`
`Case IPR2015-00870
`Patent 8,560,705
`
`
`Case IPR2014-0040122
`
`Case IPR2014-0040523
`
`Case IPR2014-00481
`
`U.S. Patent No. 7,188,180
`
`Case IPR2014-00482
`
`Case IPR2014-0141824
`
`Case IPR2014-0142125
`
`Control No. 95/001,792
`
`U.S. Patent No. 6,839,759
`
`Control No. 95/001,746
`
`
`22 The Board denied institution of this proceeding on July 23, 2014, and
`
`denied rehearing on September 5, 2014.
`
`23 The Board denied institution of this proceeding on July 23, 2014, and
`
`denied rehearing on September 5, 2014.
`
`24 The Board terminated this proceeding on January 16, 2015.
`
`25 The Board terminated this proceeding on January 16, 2015.
`
`7
`
`

`
`Patent
`
`Matter
`
`Case IPR2015-00870
`Patent 8,560,705
`
`
`U.S. Patent No. 7,987,274
`
`Case IPR2014-00403
`
`Case IPR2014-00404
`
`Case IPR2014-0048326
`
`Case IPR2014-0048427
`
`Case IPR2014-0048528
`
`U.S. Patent No. 8,051,181
`
`Case IPR2014-0048629
`
`U.S. Patent No. 8,504,697
`
`Control No. 95/001,949
`
`Case IPR2014-00237
`
`Case IPR2014-00238
`
`U.S. Patent No. 7,921,211
`
`Case IPR2013-0037830
`
`
`26 On September 15, 2014, the Board joined this proceeding with
`
`IPR2014-00403.
`
`27 On September 15, 2014, the Board joined this proceeding with
`
`IPR2014-00404.
`
`28 The Board denied institution of this proceeding on September 16, 2014.
`
`29 The Board denied institution of this proceeding on September 16, 2014.
`
`30 The Board terminated this proceeding on November 12, 2013.
`
`
`8
`
`

`
`Patent
`
`Matter
`
`Case IPR2015-00870
`Patent 8,560,705
`
`
`Case IPR2013-0039731
`
`Case IPR2013-0039832
`
`Case IPR2014-0017433
`
`Case IPR2014-0017534
`
`Case IPR2014-0061535
`
`Case IPR2014-0061636
`
`Case IPR2014-0061837
`
`
`31 The Board denied institution of this proceeding on December 18, 2013,
`
`and denied rehearing on February 12, 2014.
`
`32 The Board denied institution of this proceeding on December 18, 2013,
`
`and denied rehearing on February 12, 2014.
`
`33 The Board denied institution of this proceeding on June 5, 2014.
`
`34 The Board denied institution of this proceeding on June 5, 2014.
`
`35 The Board terminated this proceeding on January 26, 2015.
`
`36 The Board denied institution of this proceeding on October 15, 2014.
`
`37 On October 15, 2014, the Board consolidated this proceeding with
`
`IPR2014-00615 and then administratively terminated IPR2014-00618.
`
`9
`
`

`
`Patent
`
`Matter
`
`Case IPR2015-00870
`Patent 8,560,705
`
`
`Case IPR2015-0018538
`
`Case IPR2015-0018639
`
`Control No. 95/001,789
`
`Control No. 95/001,856
`
`Case IPR2015-00810
`
`Case IPR2015-00811
`
`Case IPR2015-00812
`
`Case IPR2015-00813
`
`Case IPR2015-00866
`
`Case IPR2015-00867
`
`Case IPR2015-00868
`
`Case IPR2015-00869
`
`U.S. Patent No. 8,868,705
`
`U.S. Patent No. 8,850,009
`
`U.S. Patent No. 8,458,341
`
`U.S. Patent No. 8,516,131
`
`
`38 The Board denied institution of this proceeding on February 17, 2015.
`
`39 The Board denied institution of this proceeding on February 17, 2015.
`
`10
`
`

`
`Case IPR2015-00870
`Patent 8,560,705
`
`
`
`C. U.S. Patent Applications Related to the Patent-at-Issue
`The following applications, which stem from the same applications that led
`
`to the ’705 patent, are currently pending before the Office:
`
`13/080,680
`
`13/181,041
`
`13/475,637
`
`13/615,536
`
`13/617,375
`
`
`
`
`
`13/617,446
`
`13/620,534
`
`13/890,206
`
`13/903,788
`
`13/950,877
`
`13/615,528
`
`13/620,550
`
`13/950,897
`
`14/482,956
`
`14/526,669
`
`11
`
`

`
`D. Litigations Involving the Patent-at-Issue and/or Related Patents
`The ’705 patent and/or other patents that stem from the same applications
`
`Case IPR2015-00870
`Patent 8,560,705
`
`
`that led to the ’705 patent are at issue in the following cases:
`
`VirnetX Inc. and Science Applications Int’l Corp. v.
`
`Cisco Systems, Inc., Apple Inc., Aastra USA, Inc.,
`
`Aastra Technologies Ltd., NEC Corp., and NEC Corp.
`
`of America, No. 6:10-cv-00417 (E.D. Tex.)40
`
`VirnetX Inc. and Science Applications Int’l Corp. v.
`
`Apple Inc., No. 6:12-cv-00855 (E.D. Tex.)
`
`VirnetX Inc. v. Apple Inc., No. 6:11-cv-00563 (E.D.
`
`
`40 NEC and Aastra have entered into a license agreement with VirnetX and
`
`have been dismissed from this case. The Cisco portion of the case has concluded
`
`with a final judgment. The only remaining defendant in this case is Apple. The
`
`district court entered judgment in favor of VirnetX against Apple. On September
`
`16, 2014, the Federal Circuit affirmed-in-part, reversed-in-part, vacated-in-part,
`
`and remanded for further proceedings in the district court. On October 16, 2014,
`
`VirnetX petitioned for rehearing of the Federal Circuit’s decision. On December
`
`16, 2014, the Federal Circuit denied the petition for rehearing.
`
`12
`
`

`
`Case IPR20 1 5-00870
`
`Patent 8,560,705
`
`Tex.; consolidated with case No. 6: 12-cv-00855)
`
`VirnetXInc. and Science Applications Int ’I Colp. v.
`
`Apple Inc., No. 6:13—cv-00211 (E.D. Tex.)
`
`III. Lead and Back-Up Counsel and Service Information
`
`In accordance with 37 C.F.R. §42.8(b)(3) and (b)(4), Patent Owner
`
`identifies the following lead and back-up counsel and service information:
`
`Lead Counsel
`
`Back-Up Counsel
`
`Joseph E. Palys (Reg. No. 46,508)
`
`Naveen Modi (Reg- No- 46,224)
`
`Paul Hastings LLP
`
`Paul Hastings LLP
`
`875 15“‘ Street NW
`
`375 15”‘ Street NW
`
`Washington, DC 20005
`
`Washington, DC 20005
`
`Telephone: (202) 55 1-1996
`
`Telephone: (202) 55 1-1990
`
`Facsimile: (202) 551-0496
`
`Facsimile: (202) 551-0490
`
`E—mail: josephpalys@paulhastings.com E—mail: naveenmodi@paulhastings.com
`
`13
`
`

`
`Case IPR2015-00870
`
`Patent 8,560,705
`
`Jason E. Stach (Reg. No. 54,464)
`
`Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow,
`
`Garrett & Durmer, L.L.P.
`
`303 Peachtree St., NE, Suite 3500
`
`Atlanta, GA 30308
`
`Telephone: (404) 653-6428
`
`Facsimile: (404)653-6444
`
`E-mail: jason.stach@finnegan.com
`
`Dated: April 7, 2015
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/Joseph E. Palys/
`By:
`Joseph E. Palys
`Reg. No. 46,508
`
`Counsel for Patent Owner
`
`

`
`
`
`Certificate of Service
`
`Case IPR2015-00870
`Patent 8,560,705
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.6(e), I certify that I caused to be served on the
`
`counsel for Petitioner a true and correct copy of the foregoing Patent Owner’s
`
`Mandatory Notices Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.8 by electronic means on the date
`
`below at the following address of record:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Jeffrey P. Kushan (jkushan@sidley.com)
`Scott Border (sborder@sidley.com)
`Thomas A. Broughan III (tbroughan@sidley.com)
`Sidley Austin LLP
`1501 K Street NW
`Washington, DC 20005
`
`
`
`Dated: April 7, 2015
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`By: /Joseph E. Palys/
`Joseph E. Palys
`Reg. No. 46,508
`
`Counsel for Patent Owner

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket