throbber

`
`Paper No.
`Filed: May 27, 2015
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`________________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`________________
`
`
`TOYOTA MOTOR CORPORATION,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`INNOVATIVE DISPLAY TECHNOLOGIES LLC,
`Patent Owner.
`________________
`
`IPR2015-00831
`Patent 7,434,974
`
`________________
`
`JOINT REQUEST THAT SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT BE TREATED
`AS BUSINESS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION AND KEPT
`SEPARATE UNDER 37 C.F.R § 42.74(c)
`
`

`

`Joint Request That Settlement Agreement Be Treated As
`Business Confidential Information And Kept Separate
`
`
`INTRODUCTION
`
`IPR2015-00831
`Patent No. 7,434,974
`
`Petitioner Toyota Motor Corporation (Toyota) and Patent Owner Innovative
`
`Display Technologies LLC (IDT) have entered into a settlement agreement that
`
`resolves all underlying disputes between the parties, including the inter partes
`
`review proceeding IPR2015-00831, against U.S. Patent No. 7,434,974, currently
`
`before the Board (“the proceeding”).
`
`In a hearing held May 22, 2015, in light of the settlement agreement, the
`
`Board authorized the parties to file a joint motion to terminate in the above-
`
`captioned proceeding. Also during the hearing, the Board authorized the parties to
`
`file a joint request that the Office treat the agreement business confidential
`
`information. Accordingly, the parties jointly request that the agreement be held
`
`separately and treated as business confidential information pursuant to 37 C.F.R.
`
`§ 42.74(c).
`
`STATUS OF RELATED PROCEEDINGS
`
`A. District Court Proceeding
`
`The following is the only related proceeding between the parties:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`–1–
`
`

`

`Joint Request That Settlement Agreement Be Treated As
`Business Confidential Information And Kept Separate
`
`IPR2015-0083l
`Patent No. 7,434,974
`
`
`
`
`
`US. Patent Nos.District Court Case Status
`
`6,755,547
`
`Innovative Display
`Technologies LLC v.
`
`Toyota Motor C011). Inc.,
`Case No. 2: l4-cv-200-
`JRG (ED TX.)
`
`6,508,563
`6,886,956
`7,434,974
`8,2 15,8] 6
`7 384 177
`7’300’194
`7,404,660
`
`Unopposed motion to dismiss
`without prejudice filed May 19,
`2015 and Dismissal Order
`entered May 20,
`2015-
`
`There are no other district court proceedings related to US. Patent No.
`
`7,434,974 between the parties.
`
`B. United States Patent Office Proceedings
`
`The following related inter partes review proceedings filed by Petitioner
`
`Toyota are currently before the United States Patent and Trademark Office:
`
`
`
`As noted above, the parties are concurrently filing joint requests to terminate
`
`each of the above inter partes reviews.
`
`

`

`
`
`Joint Request That Settlement Agreement Be Treated As
`Business Confidential Information And Kept Separate
`C. Foreign Proceedings
`There are no foreign proceedings related to U.S. Patent No. 7,434,974
`
`IPR2015-00831
`Patent No. 7,434,974
`
`between the parties.
`
`THE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
`
`The parties have entered into a Confidential Settlement Agreement (the
`
`“Agreement”) settling their dispute involving eight (8) U.S. Patents, including U.S.
`
`Patent No. 7,434,974. As part of the Agreement, the related district court
`
`litigation, Innovative Display Technologies LLC v. Toyota Motor Corp., Case No.
`
`2:14-cv-200-JRG (ED TX.) has been dismissed. (Exhibit 1017).
`
`RELIEF REQUESTED
`
`If requested, the rules permit the parties to have any filed settlement
`
`agreement treated as business confidential information, and kept separate from the
`
`files of the involved patent. 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(c). Indeed, the statute requires it.
`
`At the request of a party to the proceeding, the agreement or
`
`understanding shall be treated as business confidential
`
`information, shall be kept separate from the file of the involved
`
`patents, and shall be made available only to Federal
`
`Government agencies on written request, or to any person on a
`
`showing of good cause.
`
`35 U.S.C. § 317(b).
`
`
`
`–3–
`
`

`

`IPR2015-00831
`Joint Request That Settlement Agreement Be Treated As
`Patent No. 7,434,974
`Business Confidential Information And Kept Separate
`In a motion filed concurrently herewith, Petitioner and Patent Owner jointly
`
`
`
`request termination of the proceeding. The parties also submit, as part of that joint
`
`request, a true copy of the Agreement between them (Exhibit 1016). Because the
`
`Agreement contains confidential business information, the parties jointly request
`
`that the Office treat the Agreement (Exhibit 1016) as business confidential
`
`information, that the Agreement be kept separate from the file of the involved
`
`patents, and the Agreement be made available only to Federal Government
`
`agencies on written request, or to other persons only on a showing of good cause.
`
`
`
`CONCLUSION
`
`For the foregoing reasons, the Petitioner Toyota and the Patent Owner IDT
`
`jointly and respectfully request that the Board hold the Agreement as business
`
`confidential information pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(c) in the proceeding.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`–4–
`
`

`

`IPR2015-00831
`Joint Request That Settlement Agreement Be Treated As
`Patent No. 7,434,974
`Business Confidential Information And Kept Separate
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Date: 05/27/2015
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Date: 05/27/2015
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/P. Andrew Riley/
`
`
`P. Andrew Riley, Reg. No. 66,290
`Thomas W. Winland, Reg. No. 27,605
`Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow,
` Garrett & Dunner, LLP
`901 New York Ave, NW
`Washington, DC 20001
`
`Attorneys for Petitioner
`Toyota Motor Corporation
`
`
`/Justin B. Kimble/
`
`
`Justin B. Kimble, Reg. No. 58,591
`Bragalone Conroy P.C.
`2200 Ross Ave.
`Suite 4500 - West
`Dallas, TX 75201
`
`Attorneys for Patent Owner
`Innovative Disply Technologies LLC
`
`–5–
`
`

`

`Joint Request That Settlement Agreement Be Treated As
`Business Confidential Information And Kept Separate
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`IPR2015-00831
`Patent No. 7,434,974
`
`The undersigned certifies a copy of the foregoing JOINT REQUEST TO
`
`FILE AS BUSINESS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION was served on May
`
`27, 2015 via electronic mail directed to the counsel of record for the Patent Owner
`
`at the following:
`
`
`
`
`Dated: May 27, 2015
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Justin Kimble, Lead Counsel
`jkimble@bcpc-law.com
`
`Jeffrey Bragalone
`jbragalone@bcpc-law.com
`
`Terry Saad
`tsaad@bcpc-law.com
`
`Nicholas Kliewer
`nkliewer@bcpc-law.com
`
`T. William Kennedy
`bkennedy@bcpc-law.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/Bradley J. Moore/
`Bradley J. Moore
`Litigation Clerk
`
`
`
`
`
`FINNEGAN, HENDERSON,
`FARABOW, GARRETT &
`DUNNER LLP
`
`
`
`–6–
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket