throbber
(12) United States Patent
`Goldstein et al.
`
`(10) Patent No.: US 6,243,507 B1
`(45) Date of Patent: Jun. 5, 2001
`
`US006243507B1
`
`(54) CONNECTION-VERIFICATION IN OPTICAl,
`MEMS CROSSCONNECTS VIA MIRROR-
`DITHER
`
`(75) Inventors:
`
`Evan Lee Goldstein, Princeton;
`Lih-Yuan Lin, Middletown; Leda
`Maria Lunardi, Marlboro, all of NJ
`(US)
`
`(73) Assignee:
`
`AT&T Corp., New- York, NY (US)
`
`( * ) Notice:
`
`Subject to any disclaimer, the term of this
`patent is extended or adjusted under 35
`U.S.C. 154(b) by 0 days.
`
`(21) Apph No.: 09/472,682
`
`(22) Filed:
`
`Dec. 27, 1999
`
`Related U.S. Application Data
`(60) Provisional application No. 60/137,840, filed on Jun. 7,
`1999.
`
`Int. CI.7 ....................................................... G02B 6/12
`(51)
`(52) U.S. CI .................................. 385/13; 385/17; 385/’18;
`385/19
`Iqeld of Search ............................ 385/16 19, 12 14;
`359/212, 223, 225; 250/’216, 234
`
`(58)
`
`(56)
`
`Reli~rences Cited
`
`U.S. PAI’ENT DOCUMENTS
`
`5,136,671
`8/1992 Dragone ................................. 385/’46
`5,155,623
`10/1992 Miller et al .......................... 359/’495
`5,206,497
`4/1993 Lee .................................... 250/’201.1
`5,960,132
`9/1999 Lin ......................................... 385/18
`6,144,781 * 11/’2000 Goldstein et al ...................... 385/18
`
`OTHER PUBLICATIONS
`
`H. Toshiyoshi et al., "Electrostatic Micro Torsion Mirrors for
`an Optical Switch Matrix," Journal of Microelectrome-
`chanical Systems, voh 5, No. 4, Dcc. 1996, pp. 231-237.
`
`B. Behin et al., "Magnetically Actuated Micromirrors for
`Fibe~Optic Switching," Soli~State Sensor and Actuator
`Workshop, Hilton Head, South Carolina, Jun. 8-11, 1998,
`pp. 273-276.
`K. S. J. Pister et al., "Microfabricated Hinges," Sensors and
`Actuator& vol. A, No. 33 (1992), pp. 249-256.
`T. Akiyama et al., "A Quantitative Analysis of Scratch Drive
`Actuator Using Buckling Motion," IEEE VVbrkshop on
`Micro Electro Mechanical Systems; Amsterdam, The Neth-
`erlands, Jan. 29-Feb. 2, 1995, pp. 310-315.
`R. T. Chen et al., "A Low Voltage Micromachined Optical
`Switch By Stress-Induced Bending," 1Uh IEEE Interna-
`tional Conference On Micro Electro Mechanical Systems,
`Orlando, Florida, Jan. 17-21, 1999, 5 pages.
`Cronos Integrated Microsystems, Inc., "Three-Layer Poly-
`silicon Surface Micrmnachine Process," Aug. 24, 1999, pp.
`1-8 (http://mems.mcnc.org).
`L. Y. Lin et al., "Free--Space Micromachined Optical
`Switches for Optical Networking," IEEE Journal of Selected
`Topics in QuanmmElectronics, voh 5, No. 1, Jan./Fcb. 1999,
`pp. 4-9.
`
`(List continued on next page.)
`
`Primary Examiner~arren Schuberg
`Assistant Exammer~ayez Assai
`
`(57)
`
`ABSTRACT
`
`Integrated connection-verification system for use in a micro-
`electro-mechanical system (MEMS) crossconnect device.
`Fhe system uses application ol a dithering signal such as a
`sinusoidal bias to an electrode plate associated with a
`micro-mirror switching element to dither the nricro-mirror.
`The optical signal from the dithering micro-mirror is fed
`through a beam splitter, a portion of the optical signal thus
`being directed to a photodetector. If intensity modulation in
`the optical signal corresponding to the frequency of the
`dithering signal is detected by the photodetector associated
`with the tnicro-mirror, the connection path between the
`desired input and output ports is verified.
`
`11 Claims, 9 Drawing Sheets
`
`5O
`
`20
`
`10
`
`Petitioner Ciena Corp. et al.
`Exhibit 1022-1
`
`

`

`US 6,243,507 B1
`Page 2
`
`OTHER PUBLICATIONS
`
`L. Y. Lin et al., "High-Density Micromachined Polygon
`Optical Crossconnccts Exploiting Nctwork Connection-
`Symmetry," IEEE Photonics TechnoloKy Letters; vol. 10,
`No. 10, Oct. 1998, pp. 1425 1427.
`E. L. Goldstein et al., "National~Scale Networks Likely to
`Be Opaque," Lighm’ave, Feb. 1998, pp. 91-95.
`C-K. Chan et al., "A Novel Optical-Path Supervisory
`Scheme for Optical Cross Connects in All0Optical Transport
`
`Networks," IEEE Photonics Technology Letters; vol. 10, No.
`6, Jun. 1998, pp. 899-901.
`
`L. Y. Lin et aL, "Optical Cross-connect Integrated Systesm
`(OCCIS): A Free-Space Micromachined Module for Signal
`and Switching Configuration Monitoring," IEEE LECS
`Summer Topical Meeting: Optical MEMS, Monterey, Cali-
`fornia, Juh 20-22, 1998, 3 pages.
`
`* cited by examiner
`
`Petitioner Ciena Corp. et al.
`Exhibit 1022-2
`
`

`

`U.S. Patent
`US. Patent
`
`Jun. 5, 2001
`Jun. 5, 2001
`
`Sheet 1 of 9
`Sheet 1 0f 9
`
`US 6,243,507 B1
`US 6,243,507 B1
`
`FIG. i
`
`5O
`
`2O
`
`
`
`I\
`_ I I
`
`Petitioner Ciena Corp. et al.
`Petitioner Ciena Corp. et al.
`Exhibit 1022-3
`Exhibit 1022-3
`
`

`

`U.S. Patent
`US. Patent
`
`Jun. 5, 2001
`Jun. 5, 2001
`
`Sheet 2 0f 9
`Sheet 2 of 9
`
`US 6,243,507 B1
`US 6,243,507 B1
`
`
`
`
`
`FIG.2
`
`MICRO-HINGES
`
`v,e-’;';'l
`
`ZOOMm5.00W3.0120x22.1
`Acc.VSpotMagnw0l————{
`
`I"’
`
`
`
`
`
`Petitioner Ciena Corp. et al.
`Exhibit 1022-4
`
`

`

`U.S. Patent
`US. Patent
`
`Jun. 5, 2001
`Jun. 5, 2001
`
`Sheet 3 0f 9
`Sheet 3 of 9
`
`Us 6,243,507 B1
`US 6,243,507 B1
`
`PLATE
`
` ELECTRODE
`
` SPRING-LATCH
`
`
`
`
`MICRO-MIRROR
`SpotMagn120x
`
` 500W3.0 Acc.V
`
`
`SIDE-LATCH
`
`3 F
`
`IG.
`
`Petitioner Ciena Corp. et al.
`Petitioner Ciena Corp. et al.
`Exhibit 1022-5
`Exhibit 1022-5
`
`

`

`Sheet 4 or9
`
`\
`
`\
`
`
`
`

`

`U.S. Patent
`US. Patent
`
`n.m
`mm5:
`Jun. 5, 2001
`
`9M
`Sheet 5 of 9
`
`u,6SU
`1B705
`US 6,243,507 B1
`
`3,23%8;>33
`5_0w5285:“.\mm52%
`
`
`
`
`x<zfim8€535;
`
`
`
`m2:szmEmqu
`
`figmmnzfim93.
`
`55.:
`
`Petitioner Ciena Corp. et al.
`Petitioner Ciena Corp. et al.
`Exhibit 1022—7
`Exhibit 1022-7
`
`

`

`U.S. Patent
`
`Jun. 5, 2001
`
`Sheet 6 of 9
`
`US 6,243,507 B1
`
`FIG. 6
`
`RESPONSE
`(4Hz, 20mV/div)
`
`BIAS
`VOLTAGE
`(2Hz, 30V)
`
`I
`

`
`\
`\
`
`(cid:128)
`
`/
`


`I
`I
`
`\
`
`\

`
`-500.00 ms
`
`0.000 s
`
`500.00 ms
`
`FIG. 7
`
`RESPONSE
`(120Hz,
`20mV/div)
`
`BIAS
`VOLTAGE
`(60Hz, 30V)
`
`-25.000 ms
`
`0.000 s
`
`25.000 ms
`
`Petitioner Ciena Corp. et al.
`Exhibit 1022-8
`
`

`

`U.S. Patent
`
`Jun. 5, 2001
`
`Sheet 7 of 9
`
`US 6,243,507 B1
`
`FIG. 8
`
`FIG. 9
`
`RESPONSE
`(160Hz,
`20mV/div)
`
`BIAS
`VOLTAGE
`(80Hz, 3or)
`
`4
`
`RESPONSE
`(200HE,
`20mV/div)
`
`BIAS
`VOLTAGE
`(iOOHz, 3ov)
`
`I
`
`\j
`
`-25.000 ms
`
`0.00(
`
`25.000 ms
`
`Petitioner Ciena Corp. et am.
`Exhibit 1022-9
`
`

`

`U.S. Patent
`
`Jun. 5, 2001
`
`Sheet 8 of 9
`
`US 6,243,507 B1
`
`FIG. 1 0
`
`RESPONSE
`
`20mV/div)
`
`BIAS
`VOLTAGE
`(2Hz, 20V)
`
`RESPONSE
`(4Hz,
`20mV/div)
`
`BIAS
`VOLTAGE
`(2Hz, 50V)
`
`:;~.-.~-,.,~.-~
`
`’.~.....,.~y.,.’;.._ ~,!~’~’,:?~"
`
`
`
`"..,.~.,..’~.~,.~-~.-~" ,...~-
`
`:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
`
`%
`
`%
`%
`
`.%
`
`-500.00 ms
`
`0.00~
`
`500.00 ms
`
`FIG.
`
`\
`\
`\
`
`\
`
`I
`I
`
`I
`
`-500.00 ms
`
`0.00~ s
`
`500.00 ms
`
`Petitioner Ciena Corp. et al.
`Exhibit 1022-10
`
`

`

`U.S. Patent
`
`Jun. 5, 2001
`
`Sheet 9 of 9
`
`US 6,243,507 B1
`
`FIG. 12
`
`’I
`
`.~-
`I"
`I
`I
`
`RESPONSE
`
`20mV/div)
`
`BIAS
`VOLTAGE
`(2Hz, 40V)
`
`-500,00 ms
`
`0.000 s
`
`500.00 ms
`
`Petitioner Ciena Corp. et al.
`Exhibit 1022-11
`
`

`

`US 6,243,507 B1
`
`1
`CONNECTION-VERIFICATION IN OPTICAL
`MEMS CROSSCONNECTS VIA MIRROR-
`DITHER
`
`This nonprovisional application claims the benefit of s
`U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/’137,840, filed Jun. 7,
`1999.
`
`BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
`
`1. Field of Invention
`This invention relates to a connection verification system
`in an optical micro-electro-mechanical system (MEMS)
`crossconnect device.
`2. Description of Related Art
`Optical crossconnects (OXCs) have emerged as a prom-
`ising means of carrying out optical-layer provisioning and
`restoration in future, high-capacity WDM (wavelength-
`division multiplexing) networks.
`As technologies for optical switching advance, enhancing
`the networldng functionality of OXCs has become increas-
`ingly important, and doing so via integrated and low-cost
`approaches becmnes particularly desirable. One important
`requirement for the OXC is connection-verification for
`network surveillance. That is, it is desired to verify that an
`optical signal is being properly s~vitched and carried within
`the system to the desired output port or fiber.
`What is still desired is a simple, cost-effective connection
`verification system for use in a MEMS optical crossconnect
`network.
`
`SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
`It is therefore an object of the invention to develop a
`connection path verification system for use in the MEMS
`OXC.
`This and other objects are achieved by the present inven-
`tion that achieves connection path verification via integrated
`pilot-tone coding schemes utilizing micro-mirror dithering
`in the MEMS crossconnect.
`In one aspect of the invention, the invention relates to a
`connection verification system comprising a micro-mirror
`having an optical signal input side and an optical signal
`output side, the micro-mirror connected to a substrate, an
`electrode plate in association with the micro-mirror and
`capablc of dithcring the micro-mirror upon application of a
`dithering signal to the electrode plate, a beam splitter located
`on the substrate at the optical signal output side of the
`micro-mirror, and a photodetector positioned beneath the
`beam splitter.
`In a further aspect of the invention, the invention relates
`to a connection verification system of an optical micro-
`electro-mechanical crossconnect device, comprising at least
`one input port and at least one output port, a micro-mirror
`having an optical signal input side and an optical signal
`output side, the micro-mirror connected to a substrate, the
`micro-mirror being positioned on the substrate at a 45° angle
`to an incoming optical signal from one of the at least one
`input ports and at a point of intersection of a path from the
`one input port and one of the at least one output ports, an
`electrode plate in association with the micro-mirror and
`capable of dithering the micro-mirror upon application of a
`dithcring signal to thc clcctrodc plate, a beam splitter located
`on the substrate at the optical signal outpnt side of the
`micro-mirror, and a photodetector positioned beneath the
`beam splitter.
`In a still further aspect of the invention, the invention
`relates to a method of verifying the connection path of an
`
`2
`optical signal from an input port to a desired output port,
`comprising switching an optical signal from the input port to
`the dcsircd output port with a micro-mirror having an optical
`signal input side and an optical signal output side, the
`micro-mirror connected to a substrate, applying a dithering
`signal to an electrode plate in association with the micro-
`mirror to dither the micro-mirror, and splitting the optical
`signal on the optical signal output side of the micro-mirror
`into a detection portion and an output portion with a beam
`splittcr located on the substratc at the optical signal output
`side of the micro-mirror, the beam splittcr directing the
`detection portion of the optical signal to a photodetector
`located beneath the beam splitter. The connection path is
`verified when the photodetector detects alterations in inten-
`sity of the detection portion of the optical signal correspond-
`ing to the dithering signal applied to the electrode plate.
`
`10
`
`15
`
`BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF TIlE DRAWINGS
`
`FIG. 1 is an illustration of the mirror-dither ~heme for
`:0 pilot-tone coding and on-chip signal tnonitoring in the
`
`25
`
`free-space MEMS OXC of the invention.
`FIG. 2 is a SEM (scanning electron microscope) photo-
`graph of a free-rotating hinged micro-mirror in a free-space
`MEMS OXC of the invention.
`FIG. 3 is a SEM photograph of the micro-switch mirror
`with an integrated electrode.
`FIG. 4 is a schematic diagram of a microactuated free-
`rotating switch mirror.
`FIG. 5 is a SEM photograph of the beam-splitter/
`photodetector monitor module of the invention.
`FIGS. 6 9 are frequency responses of the micro-mirror at
`various frequencies and biases, while FIGS. Ill 12 are
`frequency responses of the micro-nfirror at various biases,
`35 the upper traces representing signals from the photodetector,
`
`30
`
`the lower traces representing biases on the electrode.
`
`DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF PREFERRED
`EMBODIMENTS
`
`411
`
`In a conventional nctwork, thcrc is acccss to the bit
`streams travcling within the systcm. This cnablcs casy
`manipulation of a bit stream, for example by turning signals
`on and off to represent bits, in order to verify that the bit
`45 stream is being switched to the proper output port. The
`methodology was simple and straightforward.
`However, this conventional tcchnology cannot be utilized
`in optical crosseonnect systems because access to the system
`as in the conventional technology is not available. That is, in
`50 conventional electronic systems, information can be
`manipulated at the bit level because of the devices used in
`such a system. However, in optical crossconnect systems,
`the equipment includes lenses, ctc., that do not afford
`manipulation of bits. As a result, it is not possible in optical
`55 crossconnect systems to look at information bits and deter-
`mine therefrom what they are connected to. Thus, new
`connection verification technology must be developed in
`order to confirm that the switches within the optical cross-
`connect are properly connecting an input optical signal to
`6o the desired output port.
`An optical path supervisory scheme has been proposed in
`C.-K. Chart, E. Kong, F. ’lbng and L.-K. Chert, "A Novel
`Optical-Path Supervisory Scheme For Optical Cross Con-
`nects In All-Optical Transport Networks", IEEE Photonics
`65 Tech. Lett., vol. 10, pages 899-901 (1998). In this scheme,
`use is made of periodic characteristics of arrayed-
`waveguide-gratings. Although adeqnate, this scheme is
`
`Petitioner Ciena Corp. et al.
`Exhibit 1022-12
`
`

`

`US 6,243,507 B1
`
`3
`cumbersome in terms of the hardware required. The scheme
`requires a specific arrayed-waveguide grating and requires
`additional filtcrs to bc uscd.
`Micro-electro-mechanical system (MEMS) technology,
`due to its unique capability of integrating optical, electrical
`and mechanical elements on a single chip, holds strong
`advantages for implementing multiple functionalities in
`integrated form.
`Free-space MEMS optical switches aiming at large-scale
`switch fabrics have bccn demonstrated using various
`approaches. See, for example, (1) H. Toshiyoshi and H.
`Fujita, "Electrostatic Micro Torsion Mirrors for an Optical
`Switch Matrix", J. Microelectromechanical Systems, vol. 5,
`no. 4, pp. 231-237, 1996, (2) L. Y. Lin, E. L. Goldstein, and
`R. W. Tkach, "Free-Space Micromachined Optical Switches
`for Optical Networking", IEEE J. Selected Topics in Quan-
`tum Elcctronics: Special Issue on Microoptoclcctromcchani-
`cal Systems (MOEMS), voh 5, no. 1, pp. 4 9, 1999, (3) L.
`¥ l.in, E. E. Goldstein, J. M. Simmons, and R. W. Tkach,
`"High-Density Micromachined Polygon Optical Crosscon-
`nects Exploiting Network Connection Symmetry", IEEE
`Photonics Tech. Lett., voh 10, pages 1425-1427 (1998), (4)
`R. T. Chen, II. Nguyen, and M. C. Wu, "A Low Voltage
`Micromachincd Optical Switch by Strcss-Induccd
`Bending", 12th IEEE International Conference on Micro
`Electro Mechanical Systems, Orlando, Fla., Jan. 1731,
`1999, and (5) B. Behin, K. Y. Lan, and R. S. Muller,
`"Magnetically Actuated Micromirrors for Fiber-Optic
`Switching", Solid-State Sensor and Actuator Workshop,
`IIilton Ilead Island, S.C., Jun. 8-11, 1998, each incorporated
`by reference hcrcin in their cntirctics.
`U.S. Pat. No. 5,960,132 describes an optical switch device
`that is actuated between reflective aa~d non-reflective states.
`U.S. application No. 09/472/724 entitled "Angular-Precision
`Enhancement In Free-Space Micromachined Optical
`Switches" and bascd on Provisional Application No. 60/’137,
`838 (filed Jun. 7, ] 999), describes free-space MEMS cross-
`connect optical switches that include mechanical angular
`alignment enhancement structures. This patent and
`co-pending application are both incorporated herein by
`reference in their entireties. The present invention may
`utilize thc optical switchcs described in the 132 patent
`and/or the co-pending application, with or without the
`additional mechanical angular alignment enhancement
`structures of the co-pending application. Of course, any
`other suitable switch mirror scheme may also be used.
`In free-space MEMS crossconnccts, micromachined mir-
`rors are utilized as the switching clcments. Thesc may be, for
`example, free-rotating mirrors as just discussed.
`Optical switches function to switch an optical signal from
`an input port 8, e.g., an input fiber, to an output port 85, e.g.,
`an output fiber when in the rcflcctivc position. The sxvitchcs
`are located ~vithin an open, free space. The size of the matrix
`of incoming and outgoing fibers is NxM, with N and M
`being any integer greater than 1. Optical inicro-mirror
`switching elements are typically positioned at a 45° angle to
`the direction of an inconring optical beam from an input port
`in matrix configuration, and located at the points of inter-
`scction of thc paths of each input port and each output port.
`Incoming optical beams may be directed to the desired
`oulput port through u se of the micro-mirror optical switches.
`Other conligurations, for example polygonal, are possible.
`When an incoming optical signal is not to be redirected by
`a particular micro-mirror, the micro-mirror remains in its
`rest position, which is horizontal to the substrate upon which
`the micro-mirror is mounted, or at least out of the plane of
`
`20
`
`25
`
`t0
`
`15
`
`4
`travel of the optical signal. However, if an optical signal is
`to be redirected by the micro-mirror, the micro-mirror is
`moved/raised to its rellective position, which is a predeter-
`mined position and preferably is, for example, as close to
`s perpendicular, i.e., 90°, from the substrate as possible.
`The micro-mirrors of the invention may be made of any
`conventional materiah For example, the micro-mirrors may
`be polysilicon, optional coated with a highly reflective metal
`such as gold or Cr/Au, for example as in H. Toshiyoshi and
`H. Fujita, supra.
`The micro-mirror, hinge and staple may be formed by any
`conventional process. The micro-mirrors are preferably
`formed by surface-micromachining, for example as in the
`well-known MUMPs’~a (the multi-user MEMS) process
`described in, for example, L. Y. Lin, E. L. Goldstein and R.
`W. Tkach, "Free-Space Micromachined Optical Switches
`for Optical Networking", IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in
`Quantum Electronics, voh 5, no. 1, pp. 4-9, January/
`February 1999 and K. S. J. Pister, M. W. Judy, S. R. Burgett,
`and R. S. Fearing, "Microfabricated Hinges," Sensors and
`Actuators A, vol. 33, pp. 249-256, 1992, both incorporated
`herein by reference in their entireties. In MUMPsTM, a
`polysilicon is used as the structural material, a deposited
`oxidc (PSG) is used for the sacrificial layers, and silicon
`nitride is used as an electrical isolation layer between the
`silicon substrate and the polysilicon layers. The polysilicon
`layers are referred to as poly-0, poly-1 and poly-2.
`FIGS. 2, 3 and 4 show a prcferred mirror switch of the
`invention. The micro-mirror 20 is mounted within a frame,
`3o which frame is connected to the substrate 15 by free-rotating
`micro-hinges 30. The hinges 30 include one or more hinge
`pins 22 and one or more hinge staples 24. Pushrods 26 are
`connected at one end to the mirror (mirror frame) and at the
`opposite end to the translation stage 18.
`3s Scratch-drive actuators (SDAs) 45 are preferably
`employed to move the translation stage. SDAs are
`conventional, and thus an extensive discussion of the func-
`tion of the SDAs is not necessary herein. For a discussion of
`the formation and function of SDAs see, for example, T.
`4c~ Akiyama and H. Ft~jita,"A Quantitative Analysis of Scratch
`Drive Actuator Using Buckling Motion," in IEEE Workshop
`on Micro Electro Mechanical Systems, Amsterdam, the
`Netherlands, Jan. 29-Feb. 2, 1995, incorporated herein by
`reference in its entirety. For purposes of explaining the
`45 functioning of the hingcd micro-mirrors of the present
`invention, it is sufficient to note that through application of
`an appropriate voltage to the SDA, the SDA can be
`deformed or moved to a certain extent, which defom~ation
`or movement is used to move the translation stage a trans-
`50 lation distance corresponding to the extent of deformation.
`Movement of the translation stage in turn causes the push-
`rods to act upon thc mirror frame and rotate it up to a
`predetermined position or angle from the substrate, typically
`the 90° position discussed above.
`FIG. 1 shows the micro-mirror dither scheme for pilot-
`tone coding and on-chip signal monitoring in the free-space
`MEMS OXC of the invention. In this scheme, an electrode
`plate 1!1 is associated with the micro-mirror 211.
`The electrode plate is made of any suitable material.
`~0 Preferably, the electrode plate is also a surface-
`micromachined polysilicon integrally li0rmed during the
`MUMPs process. In this way, the electrode plate can be
`fomred with the micro-nrirror. The electrode plate may be
`formed from, for example, the poly-1 layer. The electrode
`~5 plate may be integral with the micro-mirror, or it may be
`formed to separately more, for example rotate via hinge
`joints, the same as the micro-mirror.
`
`55
`
`Petitioner Ciena Corp. et al.
`Exhibit 1022-13
`
`

`

`US 6,243,507 B1
`
`5
`As the electrode plate is preferably made of polysilicon,
`it is conductive. The electrode plate contacts the polysilicon
`hingc staples. A source providing the dithering signal to the
`electrode platc can bc connected via condnctive, e.g., poly-
`silicon or gold, wiring to either the electrode plate or the
`hinge staples. The conductive wiring is also preferably
`formed photolithographically during the MUMPs formation
`process.
`Although the electrode plate is illustrated in FIG. 1 to
`extend around the exterior of the micro-mirror, any suitable
`configuration of the electrode plate can be used. The only
`requirement is that the electrode plate must be capable of
`dithering the micro-mirror when a dithering signal is applied
`to the electrode plate.
`At the 90° position, i.e., the vertical, reflective or active
`switch position, the micro-mirror can perform small angle
`modulation under external force. That is, the micro-mirror
`can be made to vary slightly in angle from its designed
`position to the incoming optical signal, e.g., 90° to the
`incoming optical signal. Thc direction of modulation is
`shown in FIG. 1.
`Dithering, i.e., repetitive, back-and-forth small angle
`modulation, of the micro-mirror is effected in the invention
`through application of a dithering signal to the electrode
`plate. Thc only rcquircmcnt of thc dithcring signal is that it
`must be capable of inducing small angular variations in the
`micro-mirror which can be detected by a photodetector. The
`dithering signal may be, for example, a sinusoidal bias or a
`sinusoidal pilot tone. Most preferably, the dithering signal is
`a sinusoidal bias. A sinusoidal bias causes the micro-mirror
`to dither at frequencies corresponding to the sinusoidal bias.
`On the output side of the micro-mirror optical switch, a
`polysilicon plate 30 is positioned at a 45° angle to both the
`substrate and the optical signal output from the micro-
`mirror. This polysilicon plate also is preferably a surface-
`micromachined polysilicon. The polysilicon plate may be
`fixcd to the substratc in the 45° position by any suitable
`means. For example, as shown in FIG. $, the polysilicon
`plate may include appropriate vertical and side supports to
`ensure the lixing of the position of the polysilicon plate.
`The polysilicon plate functions as a beam splitter. A
`portion of the optical signal output from the micro-mirror is
`reflected by the polysilicon plate beam splitter to a photo-
`detector located under the polysilicon plate and upon the
`substrate. This is illustrated in FIG. 1. The beam splitter/
`photodetector monitor module is shown in FIG. 5. Phe beam
`splitter may be formed of any suitable material, polysilicon
`merely being an illustrative example.
`The photodetector is preferably formed by, for example,
`hybrid-integrating the photodetector into the system by wire
`bonding as explained in L. Y. Lin, L. M. Lunardi and E. L.
`Goldstein, "Optical Cross-Connect Integrated System
`(OCCIS): A Free-Space Micromachined Module For Signal
`And Switching Confignration Monitoring", IEEE LEOS
`Summer Topical Meeting: Optical MEMS, Monterey, Calif.,
`Jut. 20,22, 1998, incorporated by reference herein in its
`entirety. In particular, the photodetector may be solder
`mounted on the substrate of the free-space micro-mirror
`chip.
`Small angular variations of the micro-mirror as a result of
`the dithering signal applied to the electrode plate are trans-
`formed into intensity modulafion of the detected optical
`from the photodetector. Due to the high angular sensitivity
`of single-mode optics, the resulting modulation efficiency is
`quite high. By modulating the angle of the actuated micro-
`mirror with various frequencies, a pilot-tone signal carrying
`
`25
`
`35
`
`15
`
`the connection-path information can therefore be impressed
`on the optical signal.
`In othcr xvords, the dithcring of the micro-mirror results in
`a detectable variation in the intensity of the optical beam
`s arriving at the photodetector from the polysilicon plate beam
`splitter. The detection of this variation by the photodetector
`can verify that the switching of the optical beam within the
`MEMS OXC occurred successfully. If an input optical signal
`is desired to be sent to a selected output port, verification of
`10 the switching to that output port can be done in this schcme.
`If variation in the intensity of a pilot tone sent from the input
`port is registered at the photodetector associated with the
`optical switching element feeding the selected output port,
`then the necessary switching is properly occurring.
`To measure the bandwidth and sensitivity of the hinged
`micro-mirrors, sinusoidal signals xvith various frequencies
`and amplitudes arc applied to the electrode. The modulated
`output electrical signal from the photodetector is then cap-
`tured by an oscilloscope. FIGS. 6 9 show the frequency
`20 response of the micro-mirror at 4, 120, 160 and 200 Hz,
`respectively under 30 V bias. The upper traces represent
`signals from the photodetector; the lower traces represent
`biases on the electrode.
`Various frequency responses between 4 and 200 Hz have
`been measured. The intensity-modulation frequency of sig-
`nals from the photodetector is twice the bias li-equency, as
`the mirror-angle is optimized when there is no bias. The
`responses remain similar between 4 and 120 Hz, and start to
`30 decrease as the frequency rises above 120 Hz. At 200 Hz, the
`response begins to show" signs of more complex coupling
`into the micromeehanical structure, as shown in FIG. 9.
`Thus, the frequency applied to the electrode plate is pref-
`erably kept between 4 and 200 Hz, most preferably between
`4 and 120 Hz for the current micro-mirror. ’ltm bandwidth
`can be increased by modifying the design of the micro-
`mirror.
`The rcsponscs of thc micro-mirror undcr various bias
`amplitudes are also measured. FIGS. 1~) to 12 show the
`4c~ results of 20 V, 30 V and 40V biases, respectively. The
`results may suggest that the maximum angular variation of
`the micro-mirror is restricted by its mechanical structure.
`The bias amplitude is preferably maintained between 10 and
`50 V, most preferably between 20 and 40 V for the current
`4s micro-mirror.
`In all cases, lhe intensity variation of the optical signal at
`the output of the switch fabric is expected to permit accept-
`able monitoring performance without imposing bit errors in
`transponder-based WDM networks.
`50 A pilot-tone-based encoding scheme in free-space
`MEMS-based optical crossconnects is thus achieved. The
`scheme utilizes free-rotating switch mirrors with dither
`electrode plates and integrated micro-optics. Through this
`scheme, connection verification within the MEMS OXC can
`55 be readily and cost-effectively achieved.
`What is claimed is:
`1. A connection verification system comprising
`a micro-mirror having an optical signal input side and an
`optical signal output side, the micro-mirror connected
`to a substrate,
`an electrode plate in association with the micro-mirror
`and capable of dithering the micro-mirror upon appli-
`cation of a dithering signal to the electrode plate,
`a beam splitter located on the substrate at the optical
`signal output side of the micro-mirror, and
`a photodetector positioned beneath the beam splitter.
`
`Petitioner Ciena Corp. et al.
`Exhibit 1022-14
`
`

`

`US 6,243,507 B1
`
`s
`
`8
`an electrode plate in association with the micro-mirror
`2. The connection verification system according to clainr
`and capable of dithering the micro-mirror upon appli-
`I, wherein the system is within an optical micro-electro-
`cation of a dithering signal to the electrode plate,
`mechanical crossconncct dcvicc.
`a beam splitter located on the substrate at the optical
`3. Thc connection vcrification systcm according to claim
`signal output side of the micro-mirror, and
`2, wherein the optical micro-electro-mechanical crosscon-
`a photodetector positioned beneath the beam splitter.
`nect device includes at least one input port and at least one
`8. A mcthod of verifying thc connection path of an optical
`output port, the micro-mirror being located on the substrate
`signal from an input port to a desired output port, comprising
`in a line of travel of an incoming optical signal frmn one of
`switching an optical signal from the input port to the
`the at least one input ports and at a point of intersection of
`desired output port with a micro-mirror having an
`a path from the one input port and one of the at lcast one
`optical signal input side and an optical signal output
`output ports when in a rcflcctivc position.
`side, the micro-mirror connected to a substrate,
`4. The connection verification system according to claim
`applying a dithering signal to an electrode plate in asso-
`1, wherein the electrode plate is connected to a source of the
`ciation with the micro-mirror to dither the micro-
`dithering signal via conductive wiring.
`mirror, and
`5. The connection verification system according to claim
`splitting the optical signal on the optical signal output side
`I, wherein the micro-mirror is connected to the substrate via
`of the micro-mirror into a detection portion and an
`hingc joints pcrmitting frcc rotation of the micro-mirror.
`output portion with a beam splitter located on the
`6. The connection verification system according to claim
`s~lbstrate at the optical signal outpnt side of the micro-
`1, wherein one or more of the micro-mirror, the electrode
`mirror, the beam splitter directing the detection portion
`plate and the beam splitter are comprised of a surface-
`to a photodetector located beneath the beam splitter.
`micromachined polysilicon.
`9. The method according to claim 8, wherein the dithering
`7. A connection verification system of an optical micro-
`signal is a sinusoidal bias.
`electro-mechanical crossconnect device, comprising
`10. The method according to claim 8, wherein the con-
`at least one input port and at least one output port,
`nection path is verified when the photodctcctor detects
`a micro-mirror for one of the at least one inpnt ports and 25 alterations in intensity of the detection portion of the optical
`having an optical signal input side and an optical signal
`beam corresponding to the dithering signal applied to the
`output side, the micro-mirror connected to a substrate,
`electrode plate.
`and capable of being moved to a reflective position so
`11. The method according to claim 8, wherein the optical
`as to switch an incoming optical signal from the one
`signal from the input port includes a pilot tone.
`input port to a predetermined output port when the 30
`micro-mirror is in a rcflcctivc position,
`
`15
`
`*
`
`*
`
`*
`
`*
`
`*
`
`Petitioner Ciena Corp. et al.
`Exhibit 1022-15
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket