`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`____________________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`___________________
`
`APPLE INC.,
`
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`VIRNETX, INC.,
`
`Patent Owner
`____________
`
`Case IPR2015-00811
`Patent 8,868,705
`____________
`
`PETITIONER’S MOTION FOR ADMISSION PRO HAC VICE OF
`SCOTT M. BORDER PURSUANT TO 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Petitioner, Apple Inc. (“Apple”) respectfully requests that the Board
`
`recognize Scott M. Border, Esq. as pro hac vice counsel for this proceeding.
`
`I.
`
`BACKGROUND
`Apple’s Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission is being filed pursuant to and
`
`in compliance with the Notice of Filing Date Accorded to Petition and Time Period
`
`for Filing Patent Owner Preliminary Response, which was filed March 18, 2015
`
`(Paper 3) (the “Notice”). The Notice authorizes the parties to file motions for pro
`
`hac vice admission under 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c). Further to the Notice, such
`
`“motions shall be filed in accordance with the ‘Order – Authorizing Motion for
`
`Pro Hac Vice Admission’ in Case IPR2013-00639 ” (the “Order”).
`
`II. TIME OF FILING
`This Motion for Pro Hac Vice admission is being filed in accordance with
`
`the Notice Authorizing the Filing of a Motion for Pro Hac Vice admission, and is
`
`filed greater than 21 days after that Notice.
`
`III. STATEMENT OF FACTS
`
`
`As required by the Order, the following statement of facts, supported by the
`
`attached Declaration of Scott M. Border in Support of Motion for Pro Hac Vice
`
`Admission (“Border Decl.”), shows that there is good cause for the Patent Trial
`
`and Appeal Board (“Board”) to recognize Mr. Border pro hac vice in this
`
`proceeding. As required by 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c), lead counsel, Jeffrey P. Kushan,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`is a registered practitioner experienced in proceedings before the USPTO.
`
`Mr. Border is an experienced litigation attorney. Mr. Border has been a
`
`litigating attorney for more than seven years, and has been involved in numerous
`
`patent litigation cases in federal courts and matters before the Board. Mr. Border’s
`
`experience includes representing a wide range of clients in complex intellectual
`
`property litigation, and he has appeared as counsel for Apple in a number of
`
`litigation matters before the International Trade Commission, and various District
`
`Courts. Mr. Border has also appeared pro hac vice in other matters before the
`
`Board.1 Mr. Border is a member in good standing of the Virginia State Bar and
`
`the District of Columbia Bar, with no suspensions or disbarments from practice,
`
`nor any application for admission to practice denied, nor any sanctions or
`
`contempt citations, and is admitted to practice in the United States Court of
`
`Appeals for the Federal Circuit, as well as the United States District Courts for
`
`the Northern District of Florida, Eastern District of Texas, and Eastern District of
`
`Virginia. His mailing address is at Sidley Austin LLP, 1501 K Street, N.W.,
`
`Washington, D.C. 2005, his email address is sborder@sidley.com, and his direct
`
`dial is (202) 736-8818.
`
`
`1 Mr. Border was admitted pro hac vice in IPR2013-00292, IPR2014-00039,
`IPR2014-00040, IPR2014-00481, IPR2014-00482, and IPR2015-00074.
`
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`
`
`Mr. Border has worked with lead counsel in most aspects of this
`
`proceeding. As such, Mr. Border has reviewed and is very familiar with (i) U.S.
`
`Patent No. 8,868,705, the patent at issue in this proceeding, (ii) the prior art
`
`relied upon in Apple’s Petition, (iii) the legal and factual arguments that have
`
`been addressed by Apple, and (iv) the developments in this proceeding since
`
`the filing of Apple’s Petition, as well as the developments in related matters
`
`before the Board. Mr. Border has also been involved in a number of other
`
`proceedings before the Board, has been admitted pro hac vice as backup
`
`counsel in other matters before the Board, and is familiar with its established
`
`practices. Accordingly, he has established familiarity with the subject matter
`
`at issue in these proceedings and the conduct of these proceedings to date.
`
`Mr. Border has read and will comply with the Office Patent Trial Practice
`
`Guide and the Board’s Rules for Practice for Trials set forth in part 42 of 37
`
`C.F.R., and he agrees to be subject to the USPTO Rules of Professional Conduct
`
`set forth in 37 C.F.R. §§11.01 et seq., and to disciplinary jurisdiction under 37
`
`C.F.R. §11.19(a).
`
`IV. ANALYSIS
`The facts contained in the Statement of Facts above, and contained in the
`
`Border Declaration, establish that there is good cause to admit Mr. Border pro hac
`
`vice in this proceeding under 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c). Lead counsel is a registered
`
`
`
`4
`
`
`
`
`
`practitioner, Mr. Border is an experienced litigating attorney, and Mr. Border has
`
`an established familiarity with the subject matter at issue in these proceedings.
`
`V. CONCLUSION
`Therefore, Apple respectfully submits that there is good cause for the Board
`
`to recognize Mr. Border as Pro Hac Vice during these proceedings.
`
`Apple’s Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission is accompanied by a
`
`Declaration of Scott M. Border as required by the Order.
`
`
`Dated: September 18, 2015
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/Jeffrey P. Kushan/
`
`Jeffrey P. Kushan
`Reg. No. 43,401
`Sidley Austin LLP
`1501 K Street, N.W.
`Washington, D.C. 20005
`(202) 736-8914
`Attorney for Petitioner
`
`5
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`___________________
`
`
`
`APPLE INC.
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`VIRNETX, INC.,
`
`____________
`
`Case IPR2015-00811
`Patent 8,868,705
`____________
`
`DECLARATION OF SCOTT M. BORDER IN SUPPORT OF MOTION
`FOR PRO HAC VICE ADMISSION
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`I, Scott M. Border, being duly sworn and upon oath, hereby attest to the
`
`following:
`
`1.
`
`I am a member in good standing of the Bar of the State of Virginia
`
`and the District of Columbia.
`
`2.
`
`I have not been suspended or disbarred from practice before any
`
`court or administrative body.
`
`3.
`
`I have never had an application for admission to practice before
`
`any court or administrative body denied.
`
`4.
`
`No sanctions or contempt citations has been imposed against me by
`
`any court or administrative body.
`
`5.
`
`I have read and will comply with the Office Patent Trial Practice
`
`Guide and the Board’s Rules of Practice for Trials set forth in part 42 of 37 C.F.R.
`
`6.
`
`I will be subject to the USPTO Rules of Professional Conduct set forth
`
`in 37 C.F.R. §§ 11.101 et seq. and disciplinary jurisdiction under 37 C.F.R. §
`
`11.19(a).
`
`7.
`
`I have applied to appear pro hac vice and have been granted
`
`permission to appear pro hac vice before the Office in six proceedings in the
`
`last three (3) years. See IPR2013-00292, IPR2014-00039, IPR2014-00040,
`
`IPR2014-00481, IPR2014-00482, and IPR2015-00074.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`8.
`
`I am an experienced litigation attorney, with 7 years of experience
`
`litigating patent cases in federal courts. My experience includes representing a
`
`wide range of clients in complex intellectual property litigation. I have
`
`appeared as counsel for Apple in a number of litigation matters over the
`
`span of my career.
`
`9.
`
`I have worked with lead counsel in most aspects of his
`
`participation in this proceeding. As such, I have reviewed and am very
`
`familiar with (i) U.S. Patent No. 8,868,705 the patent at issue in this matter,
`
`(ii) the prior art relied upon in Apple’s Petition, (iii) the legal and factual
`
`arguments made by Apple, and (iv) the developments in this proceeding after
`
`the filing of Apple’s Petition as well as the developments in related matters
`
`before the Board. I have also been involved in a number of other proceedings
`
`before the Board and I am familiar with its established practices.
`
`10.
`
`I hereby declare that all statements made herein of my own
`
`knowledge are true and that all statements made on information and belief are
`
`believed to be true; and further that these statements are made with knowledge
`
`that willful false statements and the like so made are punishable by fine or
`
`imprisonment, or both, under Section 1001 of Title 18 of the United States
`
`Code.
`
`Dated: September 18, 2015
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Scott M. Border
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.6(e), I hereby certify that on this 18th day of
`
`September, 2015, a true and correct copy of the foregoing Petitioner’s Motion for
`
`Pro Hac Vice Admission of Scott M. Border Under 37 C.F.R. § 42.10 (and
`
`accompanying Declaration of Scott M. Border) was served by electronic mail on
`
`the following counsel for Patent Owner:
`
`Joseph E. Palys
`E-mail: josephpalys@paulhastings.com
`
`Naveen Modi
`E-mail: naveenmodi@paulhastings.com
`
`Jason E. Stach
`E-mail: Jason.stach@finnegan.com
`
`Dated:
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`September 18, 2015
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/Jeffrey P. Kushan/
`
`Jeffrey P. Kushan
`Reg. No. 43,401
`Sidley Austin LLP
`1501 K Street, N.W.
`Washington, D.C. 20005
`(202) 736-8914
`Attorney for Petitioner