UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`______________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`______________
`
`
`
`FORD MOTOR COMPANY
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`PAICE LLC & ABELL FOUNDATION, INC.
`Patent Owner.
`
`______________
`
`
`
`U.S. Patent No. 7,237,634 to Severinsky et al.
`
`IPR Case No.: IPR2015-00801
`
`______________
`
`
`
`PETITIONER’S RESPONSE TO PATENT OWNER'S
`MOTION FOR OBSERVATIONS ON CROSS EXAMINATION
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`______________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`______________
`
`
`
`FORD MOTOR COMPANY
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`PAICE LLC & ABELL FOUNDATION, INC.
`Patent Owner.
`
`______________
`
`
`
`U.S. Patent No. 7,237,634 to Severinsky et al.
`
`IPR Case No.: IPR2015-00801
`
`______________
`
`
`
`PETITIONER’S RESPONSE TO PATENT OWNER'S
`MOTION FOR OBSERVATIONS ON CROSS EXAMINATION
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case No.: IPR2015-00801
`Attorney Docket No.: FPGP0104IPR8
`
`
`
`
`
`Exhibit
`No.
`1851
`
`1852
`1853
`
`1854
`
`1855
`
`1856
`
`1857
`
`1858
`
`1859
`
`1860
`
`1861
`
`Updated List of Exhibits
`
`Description
`
`U.S. Patent No. 7,237,634 issued to Severinsky et
`al. (July 3, 2007)
`Declaration of Jeffery L. Stein, Ph.D.
`Paice LLC v. Ford Motor Company, Case No. 1:14-
`cv-00492, District of MD, Baltimore Div.,
`Complaint (Feb. 19, 2014) (Ex. 1853 at 2-51.)
`
`Service (Feb. 25, 2014) (Ex. 1853 at 1.)
`
`Letter from Ford to Paice (Sept. 22, 2014) (Ex. 1853
`at 52.)
`U.S. Patent No. 5,343,970 issued to Severinsky
`(Sept. 6, 1994)
`U.S. Patent No. 5,865,263 issued to Yamaguchi et
`al. (Feb. 2, 1999)
`U.S. Patent No. 5,823,280 issued to Lateur (Oct. 20,
`1998)
`U.S. Patent No. 5,623,104 issued to Suga (Apr. 22,
`1997)
`Oreste Vittone et al., FIAT Research Centre, Fiat
`Conceptual Approach to Hybrid Car Design, 12th
`International Electric Vehicle Symposium, Volume
`2 (1994), (available at
`https://www.worldcat.org/title/symposium-
`proceedings-12th-international-electric-vehicle-
`symposium-december-5-7-1994-disneyland-hotel-
`and-convention-center-anaheim-
`california/oclc/32209857&referer=brief_results.)
`U.S. Patent No. 5,842,534 issued to Frank (Dec. 1,
`1998)
`USPN 7,237,634 File History
`
`Toshifumi Takaoka et al., A High-Expansion Ratio
`Gasoline Engine for the Toyota Hybrid System,
`published as part of Toyota Technical Review,
`
`Identifier
`
`’634 Patent
`
`Stein
`Ford
`Litigation
`
`Severinsky
`’970
`Yamaguchi
`
`Lateur
`
`Suga
`
`Vittone
`
`Frank
`
`’634 File
`History
`Takaoka
`
`i
`
`
`
`
`
`Exhibit
`No.
`
`Case No.: IPR2015-00801
`Attorney Docket No.: FPGP0104IPR8
`
`Description
`
`Identifier
`
`1862
`
`1863
`
`1864
`
`Prevention of Global Warming, Vol. 47, No. 2
`(Toyota Motor Corporation, April 1998) (Ex. 1861
`at 1-8.) (available at:
`https://www.worldcat.org/title/a-high-expansion-
`ratio-gasoline-engine-for-the-toyota-hybrid-
`system/oclc/205516653&referer=brief_results.)
`
`Declaration of Walt Johnson and Exhibit A (Dec.
`23, 2014) (Ex. 1861 at 9-19.)
`USPN 7,104,347 File History Excerpts
`
`Paice LLC v. Toyota Motor Corp. et al., Case No.
`2:04-cv-211, E.D. Texas, Paice Opening Claim
`Construction Brief (Mar. 8, 2005) (Ex. 1863 at 1-
`40.)
`
`Paice Claim Construction Reply Brief (Mar. 29,
`2005) (Ex. 1863 at 41-79.)
`
`Claim Construction Order (Sept. 28, 2005) (Ex.
`1863 at 80-130.)
`
`Paice LLC v. Toyota Motor Corp. et al., Case No.
`2:07-cv-180 (Paice Opening Claim Construction
`Brief (June 25, 2008) (Ex. 1863 at 131-165.)
`
`Paice Claim Construction Reply Brief (Aug. 1,
`2008) (Ex. 1863 at 166-191.)
`
`Claim Construction Order (Dec. 5, 2008) (Ex. 1863
`at 192-220.)
`Paice LLC v. Hyundai Motor Corp. et al., Case No.
`1:12-cv-0499, District of MD, Baltimore Div., Paice
`Opening Claim Construction Brief (Nov. 14, 2013)
`(Ex. 1864 at 1-37.)
`
`Paice Responsive Brief on Claim Construction (Dec.
`16, 2013) (Ex. 1864 at 38-81.)
`
`ii
`
`’347 File
`History
`Toyota
`Litigation
`
`Hyundai
`Litigation
`
`
`
`
`
`Exhibit
`No.
`
`1865
`
`1866
`
`1867
`1868
`
`Case No.: IPR2015-00801
`Attorney Docket No.: FPGP0104IPR8
`
`Description
`
`Identifier
`
`
`Claim Construction Order (Ex. 1864 at 82-122.)
`Decision of Institution, IPR2014-00570, Paper 10
`(Sept. 30, 2014) (Ex. 1865 at 1-13.)
`
`
`Excerpts from Public Patent Owner Preliminary
`Response, IPR2014-00571, Paper 11, (July 11,
`2014) (Ex. 1865 at 14-23.)
`
`Excerpts from Public Patent Owner Preliminary
`Response, IPR2014-00579, Paper 11, (July 11,
`2014) (Ex. 1865 at 24-33.)
`
`Decision of Institution, IPR2014-00571, Paper 12,
`(Sept. 30, 2014) (Ex. 1865 at 34-50.)
`
`Decision of Institution, IPR2014-00579, Paper 12,
`(Sept. 30, 2014) (Ex. 1865 at 51-64.)
`
`Decision of Institution, IPR2014-00904, Paper 13,
`(Dec. 12, 2014) (Ex. 1865 at 65-78.)
`
`Excerpts from Public Patent Owner Preliminary
`Response, IPR2014-01415, Paper 9, (Dec. 16, 2014)
`(Ex. 1865 at 79-96.)
`
`Patent Owner Response, IPR2014-00571, Paper 20
`(January 21, 2015) (Ex. 1865 at 97-162.)
`
`Patent Owner Response, IPR2014-00579, Paper 20
`(January 21, 2015) (Ex. 1865 at 163-226.)
`
`Patent Owner Response, IPR2014-00570, Paper 22
`(January 21, 2015) (Ex. 1865 at 227-292.)
`U.S. Patent No. 7,104,347 issued to Severinsky et
`al. (Sep. 12, 2006)
`Curriculum Vitae of Jeffery L. Stein
`John B. Heywood, Internal Combustion Engine
`
`iii
`
`Ford IPRs
`
`’347 Patent
`
`Jeff Stein CV
`Heywood
`
`
`
`
`
`Exhibit
`No.
`
`Case No.: IPR2015-00801
`Attorney Docket No.: FPGP0104IPR8
`
`Description
`
`Identifier
`
`1870
`
`1871
`
`1872
`
`Fundamentals (McGraw-Hill 1988) (available at
`http://catalog.loc.gov/vwebv/holdingsInfo?searchId
`=20946&recCount=25&recPointer=4&bibId=24217
`98.)
`1869 Willard W. Pulkrabek, Engineering Fundamentals of
`the Internal Combustion Engine (Prentice Hall,
`1997) (available at
`http://catalog.loc.gov/vwebv/holdingsInfo?searchId
`=10003&recCount=25&recPointer=1&bibId=21095
`03.)
`Hawley, G.G., The Condensed Chemical Dictionary,
`Van Nostrand Reinhold Co., 9th ed. (1977)
`(available at
`http://catalog.loc.gov/vwebv/holdingsInfo?searchId
`=21541&recCount=25&recPointer=14&bibId=1289
`584.)
`U.S. Patent No. 913,846 issued to Pieper (Mar. 2,
`1909)
`Michael Duoba, Ctr. for Transp. Research, Argonne
`Nat’l Lab., Challenges for the Vehicle Tester in
`Characterizing Hybrid Electric Vehicles, 7th CRC
`on Road Vehicle Emissions Workshop (April 1997)
`(available at
`http://www.osti.gov/scitech/biblio/516019.)
`Society of Automotive Engineers Special
`Publication, Technology for Electric and Hybrid
`Vehicles, SAE SP-1331 (February 1998) (available
`at http://www.worldcat.org/title/technology-for-
`electric-and-hybrid-vehicles/oclc/39802642.)
`Catherine Anderson & Erin Pettit, The Effects of
`APU Characteristics on the Design of Hybrid
`Control Strategies for Hybrid Electric Vehicles,
`SAE Technical Paper 950493, published as part of
`Society of Automotive Engineers Special
`Publication, DESIGN INNOVATIONS IN Electric
`AND Hybrid Electric Vehicles, SAE SP-1089
`(February, 1995) (available at
`
`1873
`
`1874
`
`iv
`
`Pulkrabek
`
`Hawley
`
`Pieper
`
`Duoba
`
`SP-1331
`
`Anderson
`
`
`
`
`
`Exhibit
`No.
`
`1875
`
`1876
`
`1877
`
`1878
`
`1879
`
`1880
`
`1881
`
`Case No.: IPR2015-00801
`Attorney Docket No.: FPGP0104IPR8
`
`Description
`
`Identifier
`
`Yamaguchi
`Paper
`
`Reinbeck
`
`Kawakatsu
`
`Unnewehr
`
`Brown
`
`Engh
`
`Stefanopoulou
`
`http://papers.sae.org/950493/.)
`Yamaguchi et al., Development of a New Hybrid
`System – Dual System, SAE Technical Paper
`960231, published as part of Society of Automotive
`Engineers Special Publication, Strategies in Electric
`and Hybrid Vehicle Design, SAE SP-1156,
`(February 1996) (available at
`http://www.worldcat.org/title/strategies-in-electric-
`and-hybrid-vehicle-design-sae-special-publication-
`sp-1156-a-collection-of-papers-presented-for-
`sessions-at-the-1996-sae-international-congress-and-
`exposition/oclc/312822989?ht=edition&referer=di;
`and http://papers.sae.org/960231/.)
`U.S. Patent No. 3,888,325 issued to Reinbeck (June
`10, 1975)
`U.S. Patent No. 4,335,429 issued to Kawakatsu
`(June 15, 1982)
`L. E. Unnewehr et al., Hybrid Vehicle for Fuel
`Economy, SAE Technical Paper 760121 (1976)
`(available at http://papers.sae.org/760121/.)
`Brown, T.L. et al., Chemistry, The Central Science,
`Third Edition (Prentice-Hall, 1985) (available at
`http://catalog.loc.gov/vwebv/holdingsInfo?searchId
`=21829&recCount=25&recPointer=13&bibId=4259
`071.)
`Grunde T. Engh & Stephen Wallman, Development
`of the Volvo Lambda-Sond System, SAE Technical
`Paper 770295 (1977) (available at
`http://papers.sae.org/770295/.)
`A.G. Stefanopoulou et al., Engine Air-Fuel Ratio
`and Torque Control using Secondary Throttles,
`Proceedings of the 33rd IEEE Conference on
`Decision and Control, (December 1994) (available
`at
`http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/articleDetails.jsp?tp=&
`arnumber=411385&queryText%3DA.+G.+Stefanop
`oulou+et+al.%2C+Engine+Air-
`
`v
`
`
`
`
`
`Exhibit
`No.
`
`Case No.: IPR2015-00801
`Attorney Docket No.: FPGP0104IPR8
`
`Description
`
`Identifier
`
`1882
`
`1884
`
`1885
`
`Fuel+Ratio+and+Torque+Control+using+Secondary
`+Throttles%2C+Proceedings+of+the+33rd+IEEE+C
`onference+on+Decision+and+Control+.LB.Decemb
`er+1994.RB.)
`General Electric Company, Corp. Research & Dev.,
`Near-Term Hybrid Vehicle Program, Final Report -
`Phase 1 (October 1979) (available at
`http://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=19800017707.)
`1883 William J. Palm III, Control Systems Engineering
`(John Wiley & Sons, 1986) (available at
`http://catalog.loc.gov/vwebv/holdingsInfo?searchId
`=10476&recCount=25&recPointer=0&bibId=38062
`92.)
`Ronald K. Jurgen, Automotive Electronics
`Handbook, (McGraw-Hill 1995) (available at
`http://catalog.loc.gov/vwebv/holdingsInfo?searchId
`=10485&recCount=25&recPointer=1&bibId=15986
`58.)
`Ronald E. Kruse and Thomas A. Hulse,
`Development of the Federal Urban Driving
`Schedule, SAE Technical Paper 730553 (1973).
`Kruse is a true and accurate copy of a technical
`paper that I understand was published in 1973 by
`SAE. (Kruse, Ex. 1885 at 1-2) (available at
`http://papers.sae.org/730553/)
`Feng An and Matthew Barth, Critical Issues in
`Quantifying Hybrid Electric Vehicle Emissions and
`Fuel Consumption, SAE Technical Paper 981902,
`published as part of the Future Transportation
`Technology Conference & Exposition, (August 11-
`13, 1998) (available at
`http://papers.sae.org/981902/)
`Mehrdad Ehsani et al., Propulsion System Design of
`Electric and Hybrid Vehicles, IEEE Transactions on
`Industrial Electronics, Vol. 44, No. 1 (February
`1997) (available at
`http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/articleDetails.jsp?tp=&
`
`1886
`
`1887
`
`vi
`
`GE Final
`Report
`
`Palm III
`
`Jurgen
`
`Kruse
`
`An
`
`Ehsani Paper
`
`
`
`
`
`Exhibit
`No.
`
`Case No.: IPR2015-00801
`Attorney Docket No.: FPGP0104IPR8
`
`Description
`
`Identifier
`
`1888
`
`1889
`1890
`
`1891
`
`1892
`
`1893
`
`1894
`
`1895
`
`1896
`
`1897
`
`1898
`
`1899
`
`1900
`
`arnumber=557495&queryText%3DMehrdad+Ehsan
`i+et+al.%2C+Propulsion+System+Design+of+Elect
`ric+and+Hybrid+Vehicles%2C)
`U.S. Patent No. 5,479,898 issued to Cullen et al.
`(Jan. 2, 1996)
`Reply Decl. of Dr. Jeffrey L. Stein
`Final Decision, IPR2014-01416, Paper 26 (March
`10, 2016)
`Final Decision, IPR2014-00884, Paper 38
`(December 10, 2015)
`Final Decision, IPR2014-00904, Paper 41
`(December 10, 2015)
`Final Decision, IPR2014-01415, Paper 30 (March
`10, 2016)
`Final Decision, IPR2014-00875, Paper 38
`(November 23, 2015)
`Final Decision, IPR2014-00570, Paper 44
`(September 28, 2015)
`Mr. Hannemann Deposition Transcript (IPR2014-
`00571, April 7, 2015) (Ex. 1896 at 1-65)
`
`Mr. Hannemann Deposition Transcript (IPR2014-
`00570, April 8, 2015) (Ex. 1896 at 66-105)
`
`Mr. Hannemann Deposition Transcript (IPR2014-
`00875, April 8, 2015) (Ex. 1896 at 106-155)
`
`Mr. Hannemann Deposition Transcript (IPR2014-
`01415, September 4, 2015) (Ex. 1896 at 156-178)
`Bosch Automotive Handbook (Oct. 1996)
`
`Dr. Stein Deposition Transcript (IPR2014-00875,
`March 3, 2015)
`Mr. Hannemann Deposition Exhibit 2, pp. 1, 7
`(IPR2014-00875, April 8, 2015)
`Transcript of Oral Hearing held on July 1, 2015
`(IPR2014-00570, -571, -579, -875, -884, -904)
`
`vii
`
`Cullen
`
`Reply Decl.
`’1416 Final
`Decision
`’884 Final
`Decision
`’904 Final
`Decision
`’1415 Final
`Decision
`’875 Final
`Decision
`’570 Final
`Decision
`Hn Transcripts
`
`Bosch
`Handbook
`Stein Tr. 1
`
`Hn Dep. Ex.2
`
`Oral Hearing
`Tr. 2015
`
`
`
`
`
`On May 20, 2016, Patent Owner filed its Motion for Observations on the
`
`Case No.: IPR2015-00800
`Attorney Docket No.: FPGP0104IPR8
`
`Cross Examination of Dr. Jeffrey Stein. (“POM,” Paper 21.) Petitioner
`
`respectfully submits the following responses to each of the Patent Owner’s
`
`observations.
`
`A. Observation 1
`
`Patent Owner’s observation is not relevant because Dr. Stein’s deposition
`
`testimony is not inconsistent with his declaration testimony. On pages 6-7 of Ex.
`
`2819, Dr. Stein stated that if he were teaching his students about the factors that
`
`“contribute to the torque required to propel [] vehicles,” then he would discuss
`
`“lots of different issues,” including: “the inertia of the vehicle and, therefore, the
`
`acceleration of the vehicle . . . the acceleration of any rotating parts, friction of
`
`rotating parts, aerodynamic drag considerations, so moving the vehicle through the
`
`air, the wind, grade.” (Stein Tr., Ex. 2819 at 6:11-7:5.)
`
`This is not relevant to Dr. Stein’s cited declaration testimony, which
`
`addresses Patent Owner’s arguments to add limitations to claim 241, e.g., “the
`
`engine is brought into operation” and “a comparison of the RL to a setpoint (SP)
`
`results in a determination that.” (Reply Decl., Ex. 1889, ¶¶6-12.)
`
`Patent Owner further states that this “testimony is relevant because it calls
`
`into question Dr. Stein’s reply declaration testimony that U.S. Patent No.
`
`5,343,970 (‘the ’970 patent’) uses road load.” (POM at 1.) Here, Patent Owner
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`appears to be re-arguing for an interpretation of “road load” that includes how
`
`Case No.: IPR2015-00801
`Attorney Docket No.: FPGP0104IPR8
`
`“road load” is determined by importing external torque requirements, e.g., that one
`
`must separately measure/determine external “factors such as aerodynamic drag,
`
`wind, grade, and acceleration.” (POM at 1, see also POR at 51-52; Hn. Decl., Ex.
`
`2808, ¶¶135, 138.) Dr. Stein addressed this argument in paragraphs 49-50 of his
`
`reply declaration (Ex. 1889), and concluded: “This whole argument is irrelevant
`
`because the challenged claims do not require determining ‘the amount of
`
`instantaneous torque required to propel the vehicle’ based on rolling resistance or
`
`wind resistance, but not based on accelerator pedal, as argued by Mr. Hannemann.”
`
`(Reply Decl., Ex. 1889, ¶50.) In IPR2014-00875, the Board also rejected such an
`
`interpretation of “road load”:
`
`We are not persuaded by this argument because we decline to import
`
`“external torque requirements” into our interpretation of “road load,”
`
`as discussed above. See Section I.E.1.
`
`Accordingly, we are persuaded by Petitioner that “driveability torque
`
`requirement” and “total traction torque” represent the instantaneous
`
`torque required to propel the vehicle and, therefore, Vittone discloses
`
`“road load.”
`
`(‘875 Final Decision, Ex. 1894 at 10-11, emphasis added.)
`
`
`
`Further, during the Oral Hearing for IPR2014-00875, Patent Owner’s
`
`counsel admitted that the ‘347 Patent (which shares a specification with the ‘388
`
`2
`
`
`
`
`
`Patent and the ‘634 Patent) does not disclose how “road load” is determined. (See
`
`Case No.: IPR2015-00801
`Attorney Docket No.: FPGP0104IPR8
`
`Oral Hearing Tr. 2015, Ex. 1900 at 41:10-19.)
`
`B. Observation 2
`
`Patent Owner’s observation is not relevant because Dr. Stein’s deposition
`
`testimony is not inconsistent with his declaration testimony. In his deposition, Dr.
`
`Stein described the challenged claims and Suga. (Stein Tr., Ex. 2819 at 12:5-16.)
`
`Dr. Stein stated that the challenged “claim” of the ‘634 Patent is directed to “sizing
`
`the electric motor, and the power performance of an electric motor, and that's what
`
`the claim is talking about for an electric vehicle.” (Stein Tr., Ex. 2819 at 12:11-14.)
`
`Then Patent Owner’s counsel asked Dr. Stein to clarify his previous answer, and
`
`Dr. Stein stated that challenged claims 291 and 266 of the ‘634 Patent are directed
`
`to a “vehicle being operated in what is often called EV mode, electric vehicle
`
`mode.” (Stein Tr., Ex. 2819 at 12:17-13:9.) Dr. Stein further stated that Suga
`
`suggests evaluating “an electric motor that's going to be used in an electric vehicle
`
`or a hybrid electric vehicle that's in electric vehicle mode to evaluate it relative to,
`
`amongst other things, driving cycles, such as the FUDS driving cycle.” (Stein Tr.,
`
`Ex. 2819 at 13:12-18.)
`
`Dr. Stein explained in paragraphs 39-45 of his Reply Declaration that
`
`“[s]ince Severinsky ’970’s HEV operates very much like an electric vehicle in low
`
`speed mode, it would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art to
`
`3
`
`
`
`
`
`test Severinsky ’970’s electric motor using the electric vehicle testing apparatus
`
`Case No.: IPR2015-00801
`Attorney Docket No.: FPGP0104IPR8
`
`disclosed in Suga to confirm that it meets the FUDs test.” (Reply Declaration, Ex.
`
`1889, ¶43; see also, Stein, Ex. 1852, ¶395.) Thus Dr. Stein’s cited deposition
`
`testimony does not contradict his Reply Declaration, as the deposition testimony
`
`refers to the electric vehicle (EV) mode limitations of the challenged claims.
`
`
`
`Dated: May 27, 2016
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
` /Andrew B. Turner/
`Andrew B. Turner (Reg. No. 63,121)
`Frank A. Angileri (Reg. No. 36,733)
`Marc Lorelli (Reg. No. 43,759)
`John P. Rondini (Reg. No. 64,949)
`Brooks Kushman P.C.
`1000 Town Center, 22nd Floor
`Southfield, MI 48075
`(248) 358-4400
`
`Lissi Mojica (Reg. No. 63,421)
`Kevin Greenleaf (Reg. No. 64,062)
`Dentons US LLP
`1530 Page Mill Road, Suite 200
`Palo Alto, CA 94304-1125
`650 798 0300
`Attorneys for Patent Owner
`
`4
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case No.: IPR2015-00801
`Attorney Docket No.: FPGP0104IPR8
`
`Certificate of Service
`
`The undersigned hereby certifies that on May 27, 2016, a complete and
`entire copy of Petitioners Response to Patent Owner’s Motion for
`Observations on Cross Examination, was served via electronic mail by serving
`the correspondence email addresses of record as follows:
`
`
`LEAD COUNSEL
`Timothy W. Riffe, Reg. No. 43,881
`3200 RBC Plaza
`60 South Sixth Street
`Minneapolis, MN 55402
`Tel: (202) 783-5070
`
`Email: Riffe@fr.com and
`
` IPR36351-0015IPD@fr.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`BACK-UP COUNSEL
`Kevin E. Greene, Reg. No. 46,031
`Ruffin B. Cordell, Reg. No. 33,487
`Linda L. Kordziel, Reg. No. 39,732
`Brian J. Livedalen, Reg. No. 67,450
`Daniel A. Tishman
`3200 RBC Plaza
`60 South Sixth Street
`Minneapolis, MN 55402
`Tel: (202) 783-5070
`Email: IPR36351-0015IPD@fr.com
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
` /Andrew B. Turner/
`Andrew B. Turner (Reg. No. 63,121)
`Frank A. Angileri (Reg. No. 36,733)
`Marc Lorelli (Reg. No. 43,759)
`John P. Rondini (Reg. No. 64,949)
`Brooks Kushman P.C.
`1000 Town Center, 22nd Floor
`Southfield, MI 48075
`(248) 358-4400
`
`Lissi Mojica (Reg. No. 63,421)
`Kevin Greenleaf (Reg. No. 64,062)
`Dentons US LLP
`1530 Page Mill Road, Suite 200
`Palo Alto, CA 94304-1125
`650 798 0300
`Attorneys for Petitioner
`
`5
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
