`
`______________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`______________
`
`
`
`FORD MOTOR COMPANY
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`PAICE LLC & ABELL FOUNDATION, INC.
`Patent Owner.
`
`______________
`
`
`
`U.S. Patent No. 7,237,634
`IPR Case No.: IPR2015-00606
`
`AND
`
`U.S. Patent No. 7,237,634
`IPR Case No.: IPR2015-00799
`
`______________
`
`
`
`NOTICE OF FILING FORD MOTOR COMPANY’S
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBITS
`(GROUP 2)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case Nos.: IPR2015-00606 & 2015-00799
`Attorney Docket Nos.: FPGP0104IPR2 & FPGP0104IPR13
`
`
`
`Attached please find Ford’s demonstrative exhibits to be used at the trial
`
`hearing on June 29, 2016 at 9:00 AM in regard to Case Nos. IPR2015-00606 &
`
`IPR2015-00799 (Group 2).
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Dated: June 24, 2016
`
`
`
` /Frank A. Angileri /
`Frank A. Angileri (Reg. No. 36,733)
`Sangeeta G. Shah ( Reg. No. 38,614)
`Michael D. Cushion (Reg. No. 55,094)
`Michael N. MacCallum (Reg. No. 63,108)
`BROOKS KUSHMAN P.C.
`1000 Town Center, 22nd Floor
`Southfield, MI 48075
`(248) 358-4400
`
`Lissi Mojica (Reg. No. 63,421)
`Kevin Greenleaf (Reg. No. 64,062)
`DENTONS US LLP
`1530 Page Mill Road, Suite 200
`Palo Alto, CA 94304-1125
`650 798 0300
`
`Attorneys for Petitioner
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`
`
`Case Nos.: IPR2015-00606 & 2015-00799
`Attorney Docket Nos.: FPGP0104IPR2 & FPGP0104IPR13
`
`Certificate of Service
`
`The undersigned hereby certifies that on June 24, 2016, a complete and
`entire copy of NOTICE OF FILING FORD MOTOR COMPANY’S
`DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBITS (GROUP 2), was served via electronic mail by
`serving the correspondence email address of record as follows:
`
`
`BACK-UP COUNSEL
`Kevin E. Greene, Reg. No. 46,031
`Ruffin B. Cordell, Reg. No. 33,487
`Linda L. Kordziel, Reg. No. 39,732
`Brian J. Livedalen, Reg. No. 67,450
`Daniel A. Tishman
`3200 RBC Plaza
`60 South Sixth Street
`Minneapolis, MN 55402
`Tel: (202) 783-5070
`Email: IPR36351-0015IPA@fr.com;
`
`IPR36351-0015IPB@fr.com;
`
`Riffe@fr.com; Greene@fr.com
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
` /Frank A. Angileri/
`Frank A. Angileri (Reg. No. 36,733)
`Sangeeta G. Shah ( Reg. No. 38,614)
`Michael D. Cushion (Reg. No. 55,094)
`Michael N. MacCallum (Reg. No. 63,108)
`Brooks Kushman P.C.
`1000 Town Center, 22nd Floor
`Southfield, MI 48075
`
`Lissi Mojica (Reg. No. 63,421)
`Kevin Greenleaf (Reg. No. 64,062)
`Dentons US LLP
`1530 Page Mill Road, Suite 200
`Palo Alto, CA 94304-1125
`
`Attorneys for Petitioner
`
`2
`
`LEAD COUNSEL
`Timothy W. Riffe, Reg. No. 43,881
`
`3200 RBC Plaza
`60 South Sixth Street
`Minneapolis, MN 55402
`Tel: (202) 783-5070
`Email: IPR36351-0015IPA@fr.com;
`
`IPR36351-0015IPB@fr.com;
`
`Riffe@fr.com; Greene@fr.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IPR 2015-00606
`IPR 2015-00799
`
`FORD DEMONSTRATIVES
`
`FORD MOTOR COMPANY, PETITIONER v.
`PAICE LLC et al, PATENT OWNERS
`
`Inter Partes Review Consolidated Oral Hearing,
`IPR 2015-00606
`IPR 2015-00799
`
`
`
`Overview
`
`IPR 2015-00606
`IPR 2015-00799
`
`Overview
`
`GROUND- IPR2015-00606
`
`CLAIMS
`
`§103 obvious over the ‘455 PCT
`Publication and Severinsky ’970
`
`56-65, 68-77, 242-
`251, 268-277, 292,
`293 and 298
`
`GROUND- IPR2015-00799
`
`CLAIMS
`
`§103 obvious over the ‘455 PCT
`Publication and Severinsky ’970
`
`81-90, 115-124, 162-
`171 and 216-225
`
`Single Disputed Issue: Whether the ‘455 PCT Publication is prior art to the
`Challenged Claims
`
`Sub-issues: 1) Written description 2)Incorporation 3) Burden
`
`*All cites will relate to IPR2015-00606, parallel citations for IPR2015-00799 are provided in the index
`
`2
`
`
`
`‘634 Patent Family
`
`IPR 2015-00606
`IPR 2015-00799
`
`The ’634 Patent Family Chart
`
`WO 00/15455
`Pub. 3-23-00
`
`US 6,209,672
`Appl. No.: 09/264,817
`Filed 3-9-99
`
`Over 1 Year
`102(b)
`Prior Art
`
`C.I.P.
`
`60/100,095
`Filed 9-14-98
`
`US 7,237,634
`Appl. No.: 11/229,762
`Filed: 1-13-06
`
`US 6,554,088
`Appl. No.: 09/822,866
`Filed: 4-2-01
`
`US 7,104,347
`Appl. No.: 10/382,577
`Filed: 3-7-03
`
`60/122,296
`Filed 3-1-99
`
`US 6,338,391
`Appl. No.: 09/392,743
`Filed 9-9-99
`
`** Only relevant family members shown
`
`US 7,455,134
`Appl. No.: 11/429,457
`Filed: 5-8-06
`
`Petition at 7.
`(color annotation added)
`
`Under 35 U.S.C. § 120, subject matter found only in the ‘095 Provisional can not
`provide written description support for the ‘634 patent claims. Reply at 4.
`
`3
`
`
`
`Sub-Issue 1
`
`IPR 2015-00606
`IPR 2015-00799
`
`Sub-issue 1: Whether the priority applications filed
`before the ‘866 CIP application provide written
`description support for the electrical limitations
`
`“a ratio of maximum DC voltage to [maximum current] supplied
`is at least 2.5” (the “at least 2.5 ratio” limitation);
`
`“maximum DC voltage . . . is at least approximately 500 volts”
`(the “500 volts” limitation); and
`
`“maximum current . . . is less than approximately 150 amperes”
`limitation (the “150 amperes” limitation).
`
`(POR at 6-12; Reply at 3.)
`
`4
`
`
`
`Sub-Issue 1- ‘866 CIP Application Disclosure
`Disclosure
`Electrical Limitations Are Disclosed For
`The First Time In The ‘866 CIP Application
`
`IPR 2015-00606
`IPR 2015-00799
`
`Petition at 8.
`
`‘866 CIP App., Ex. 1161 at 89:18-90:28
`
`5
`
`
`
`Sub-Issue 1 – 2.5 ratio
`
`IPR 2015-00606
`IPR 2015-00799
`
`The at least 2.5 ratio limitation
`
`• No disclosure of any numerical ratio. Reply at 4; Reply Dec. ¶¶12-13
`
`• No motivation to calculate a ratio. Reply at 4.; Reply Decl. ¶14
`
`No conception
`of at least 2.5
`ratio limitation
`
`No possession
`of the
`invention
`
`• ‘866 CIP Application:
`
`No written
`description
`
`Reply at 4-5, Reply Decl. ¶¶ 9-15
`
`‘866 CIP App, Ex. 1161 at 90:2-14
`
`6
`
`
`
`Sub-Issue 1 – 500 volts
`
`IPR 2015-00606
`IPR 2015-00799
`
`The at least 500 volts limitation lacks support
`
`‘866 CIP App, Ex. 1161 at 90:26-28
`
`‘743 Application, Ex., 1163, at 16:5-8
`
`we tend to talk about batteries in terms
`of their open-circuit battery voltage. So you go to
`the store and you say I would like to buy a battery
`for my car, I need a 12-volt battery for my car, you
`classify that battery by its open-circuit voltage.
`That’s how we tend to talk about batteries.
`Because the voltage that the battery will have
`when it is connected to an electrical load will, of
`course, change, depending on what that load is.
`
`Stein Tr., Ex. 2109, at 81:16-24
`
`. . .
`
`‘817 Application, Ex., 1162, at 50-51
`
`7
`
`
`
`Sub-Issue 1 - “Derived” Ratio/Voltage lack support
`
`IPR 2015-00606
`IPR 2015-00799
`
`“Derived” Ratio/Voltage lack support
`
`Disclosed Motor
`Power
`
`Disclosed
`Current
`
`Derived Voltage Under
`Load
`
`Derived Ratio of Voltage
`to Current
`
`50 hp/37.28 kW
`
`50 hp/37.28 kW
`
`100 hp/74.57 kW
`
`100 hp/74.57 kW
`
`100 A
`
`200 A
`
`100 A
`
`200 A
`
`372.85 V
`
`186.42 V
`
`745.70 V
`
`372.85 V
`
`3.7285:1
`
`0.9321:1
`
`7.457:1
`
`1.86425:1
`
`‘743 App.
`
`‘095 App.
`
`POR at 38. (color annotation added)
`
`POR at 38.
`(color annotation added)
`
`‘817 App.
`
`8
`
`
`
`Sub-Issue 1 - “Derived” Ratio/Voltage lack support
`
`IPR 2015-00606
`IPR 2015-00799
`
`“Derived” Ratio/Voltage lack support
`
`Disclosed Motor
`Power
`
`Disclosed
`Current
`
`Derived Voltage Under
`Load
`
`Derived Ratio of Voltage
`to Current
`
`50 hp/37.28 kW
`
`50 hp/37.28 kW
`
`100 hp/74.57 kW
`
`100 hp/74.57 kW
`
`100 A
`
`200 A
`
`100 A
`
`200 A
`
`372.85 V
`
`186.42 V
`
`745.70 V
`
`372.85 V
`
`3.7285:1
`
`0.9321:1
`
`7.457:1
`
`1.86425:1
`
`POR at 38.
`(color annotation added)
`
`Claimed Ratio
`0.9321:1 | 1.86425:1 < 2:1 < at least 2.5:1 < 3.7285:1 | 7.457:1
`
`“Derived” Ratios Prior Art: Toyota Prius
`Ex. 1961, ‘634 Patent, 50:66-51:26
`From ‘743 and ‘817 Apps.
`Claimed Ratio
`186.42 V & 372.85 V < at least 500 volts < 745.70 V
`
`“Derived” Ratios
`From ‘095 Appl.
`
`“Derived” Voltage from ‘817 App.
`
`“Derived” Voltage from ‘095 App.
`
`9
`
`
`
`Sub-Issue 1 – 150 amperes
`There is no support for the “less than 150
`amperes” limitation
`
`IPR 2015-00606
`IPR 2015-00799
`
`Paice:
`
`The ‘817 application teaches:
`
`POR at 33
`
`‘817 Application, Ex. 1162 at 50:22-29
`
`‘866 CIP App., Ex. 1161 at 90:9-12
`
`10
`
`
`
`Sub-Issue 1- ‘866 CIP Application Disclosure
`Disclosure
`Electrical Limitations Are Disclosed For
`The First Time In The ‘866 CIP Application
`
`IPR 2015-00606
`IPR 2015-00799
`
`Petition at 8.
`
`‘866 CIP App., Ex. 1161 at 89:18-90:28
`
`11
`
`
`
`Sub-Issue 1 - Admission
`
`IPR 2015-00606
`IPR 2015-00799
`
`Paice admits that the preferred ranges are new
`
`Ex.1164, ‘634 File History at 311
`
`Ex.1152, Stein Decl., at ¶113
`
`12
`
`
`
`Sub-Issue 2
`
`IPR 2015-00606
`IPR 2015-00799
`
`Sub-Issue 2: Whether Severinsky ‘970 cures the lack
`of written description support in the priority applications
`
`Reply at 12-21.
`
`Question A: Is Severinsky ‘970 incorporated into the priority
`applications pre-dating the ‘455 PCT publication? Reply at 12-16.
`
`i.
`ii.
`
`Detailed particularity requirement Reply at 12-13.
`Impact of “differences” Reply at 14.
`
`Question B: Are the electrical limitations supported by Severinsky
`‘970? POR at 18-32; Reply at 16-21.
`
`13
`
`
`
`Sub-Issue 2 - Incorporation
`
`IPR 2015-00606
`IPR 2015-00799
`
`The incorporation language
`
`‘817 Application, Ex. 1162 at 18:24-30
`
`More specifically, the alleged incorporation by reference clause(s)
`fail to provide any clarity on what, if any, subject matter is to be incorporated
`in relation to the claimed electrical limitations.
`. . . the disclosures are different and thus the Severinsky ‘970 disclosure
`would not be incorporated into the priority applications.
`
`Reply Decl., Ex. 1188 at ¶¶43-44
`
`‘970
`
`Priority App
`
`1,000 -1,400 volts
`500-1500 volts open circuit
`
`1) 768 open-circuit voltage in ‘817 App.
`2) 800-1200 open-circuit voltage in ‘743 App.
`
`up to 75 amperes
`
`up to 200 amperes
`
`No disclosure of 2.5:1 or any ratio
`
`No disclosure of 2.5:1 or any ratio
`
`See Reply Decl., Ex. 1188, ¶¶45-48
`
`14
`
`
`
`Sub-Issue 2 – Disclosed & “Derived” Ratios/Voltages
`Ratios/Voltages
`Severinsky ‘970 does not disclose the
`ratio or voltage limitations
`
`IPR 2015-00606
`IPR 2015-00799
`
`POR at 37.
`
`Severinsky ‘970, Ex. 1154 at 19:39-53. (emphasis added.)
`
`(Toyota Prius) 2.1 < a ratio of at least 2.5:1 < 4.19:1 < 24:1 and 28:1
`
`Ex. 1151, ‘634 Patent, 50:66-51:26
`
`Reply Decl., Ex. 1188, ¶59
`
`at least 500 volts <
`
`1,000-1,400 volts
`500-1500 volts (open circuit)
`
`“Derived” Ratios from Severinsky ‘970
`
`Reply Decl., Ex. 1188, ¶60
`
`From Severinsky ‘970
`
`15
`
`
`
`Sub-Issue 2 – Disclosed & “Derived” Currents
`
`IPR 2015-00606
`IPR 2015-00799
`
`Severinsky ‘970 does not disclose the
`current limitations
`
`POR at 27.
`
`Severinsky ‘970, Ex. 1154 at 20:25-32
`
`Reply Decl., Ex. 1188 at ¶69
`
`Paice relies on an incorrect “derivation” of 119 amperes as support for the 150 amperes
`limitation. . . Paice applies the same flawed approach to “derive” a current of 29.828 amperes
`using the 60 hp lower value in one example, while ignoring the 50 amperes maximum current
`value that is provided in that example.
`
`Reply Decl., Ex. 1188 at ¶¶ 71-72
`
`29.828 < 30-75 < 119 < less than 150 amperes limitation
`amperes
`Amperes maximum
`amperes
`“derivation”
`current range, to 50
`“derivation”
`amperes
`
`From Severinsky ‘970
`
`16
`
`
`
`Sub-Issue 3-Burden
`
`IPR 2015-00606
`IPR 2015-00799
`
`Sub-Issue 3: Whether Paice has met its burden of
`proof that the priority applications support the
`challenged claims
`
`Reply at 6-12.
`
`Technology Licensing Corp. v. Videotek, Inc., 454 F.3d 1316, 1327 (Fed. Cir. 2003)
`
`Reply at 24.
`
`17
`
`
`
`Index
`
`Slide
`Number
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`IPR2015-00606
`
`IPR2015-00799
`
`Petition at 7. (color annotation added)
`Reply at 4.
`
`POR at 18-32
`Reply, 29 at 6-12
`
`Petition at 7.
`Reply at 4.
`
`POR at 18-32
`Reply, 29 at 6-12
`
`Petition at 8.
`‘866 CIP App., Ex. 1161 at 89:18-90:28
`
`Petition at 8.
`‘866 CIP App., Ex. 1971 at 89:18-90:28
`
`Reply at 4; Reply Decl. ¶12-13
`Reply at 4; Reply Decl. ¶14
`Reply at 4-5, Reply Decl. ¶9-15
`‘866 CIP App, Ex. 1161 at 90:2-14
`
`‘866 CIP App, Ex. 1161 at 90:26-28
`‘743 Application, Ex., 1163, at 16:5-8
`Stein Tr., Ex. 2109, at 81:16-24
`‘817 Application, Ex., 1162, at 50-51
`
`Reply at 4; Reply Decl. ¶12-13
`Reply at 4; Reply Decl. ¶14
`Reply at 4-5, Reply Decl. ¶9-15
`‘866 CIP App, Ex. 1971 at 90:2-14
`
`‘866 CIP App, Ex. 1971 at 90:26-28
`‘743 Application, Ex., 1163, at 16:5-8
`Stein Tr., Ex. 2109, at 81:16-24
`‘817 Application, Ex., 1972, at 50-51
`
`POR at 38. (color annotation added)
`
`POR at 38.
`
`POR at 38. (color annotation added)
`Ex. 1151, ‘634 Patent, 50:66-51:26
`
`POR at 33.
`‘817 Application, Ex. 1162 at 50:22-29
`‘866 CIP App., Ex. 1161 at 90:9-12
`
`Petition at 8.
`‘866 CIP App., Ex. 1161 at 89-90
`
`Ex.1164, ‘634 File History at 311
`Ex.1152, Stein Decl., at ¶113
`
`Reply at 12-21.
`Reply at 12-16.
`Reply at 12-13.
`Reply at 14.
`POR at 18-32; Reply at 16-21
`
`POR at 38.
`Ex. 1961, ‘634 Patent, 50:66-51:26
`
`POR at 33.
`‘817 Application, Ex. 1972 at 50:22-29
`‘866 CIP App., Ex. 1971 at 90:9-12
`
`Petition at 8.
`‘866 CIP App., Ex. 1971 at 89-90
`
`Ex.1974, ‘634 File History at 311
`Ex.1962, Stein Decl., at ¶113
`
`Reply at 12-21.
`Reply at 12-16.
`Reply at 12-13.
`Reply at 14.
`POR at 18-32; Reply at 16-21
`
`IPR 2015-00606
`IPR 2015-00799
`
`18
`
`
`
`Index
`
`Slide
`Number
`
`IPR2015-00606
`
`IPR2015-00799
`
`IPR 2015-00606
`IPR 2015-00799
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`‘817 Application, Ex. 1162 at 18:24-30
`Reply Decl., Ex. 1188 at ¶¶43-44
`See Reply Decl., Ex. 1188, ¶¶45-48
`
`POR at 37.
`Severinsky ‘970, Ex. 1154 at 19:39-53. (emphasis added.)
`Reply Decl., Ex. 1188 at ¶59
`Ex. 1151, ‘634 Patent, 50:66-51:26
`Reply Decl., Ex. 1188, ¶60
`
`POR at 27.
`Servinsky ‘970, Ex. 1154 at 19:39-53.
`Reply Decl., Ex. 1188 at ¶69
`Reply Decl., Ex. 1188 at ¶¶71-72
`
`Reply at 6-12.
`Reply at 24.
`
`‘817 Application, Ex. 1972 at 18:24-30
`Reply Decl., Ex. 1999 at ¶¶43-44
`See Reply Decl., Ex. 1999, ¶¶45-48
`
`POR at 28.
`Servinsky ‘970, Ex. 1964 at 19:39-53.
`Reply Decl., Ex. 1999 at ¶59
`Ex. 1961, ‘634 Patent, 50:66-51:26
`Reply Decl., Ex. 1999 at ¶¶60
`
`POR at 28.
`Servinsky ‘970, Ex. 1964 at 19:39-53.
`Reply Decl., Ex. 1999 at ¶69
`Reply Decl., Ex. 1999 at ¶¶71-72
`
`Reply at 6-12.
`Reply at 24.
`
`19