throbber
VWGoA - Ex. 1008
`Volkswagen Group of America, Inc., Petitioner
`
`1
`
`

`

`Amendments to the Claims:
`
`This listing of claims will replace all prior versions, and listings, of claims in the
`
`application.
`
`Listing of Claims:
`
`Claim 1 (currently amended): A light emitting assembly for vehicle illumination
`
`comprising a light guide having at least one light input surface, one or more light
`
`emitting diodes a—plurality—ef—elesely—spaeed—light—seurees along said light input
`
`surface for supplying light to said light guide, a plurality of light extracting
`
`deformities on at least one surface of said light guide, said deformities having
`
`shapes for controlling an output ray angle distribution of emitted light to suit a
`
`particular application, and a transparent substrate overlying at least one surface
`
`of said light guide, said substrate providing an exterior portion of a vehicle for
`
`vehicle illumination at said exterior portion.
`
`Claim 2 (original): The assembly of claim 1 wherein said substrate comprises at
`
`least one of a sheet, film, lens and plate.
`
`Claim 3 (original): The assembly of claim 1 wherein said substrate is attached to
`
`said light guide.
`
`Claim 4 (original): The assembly of claim 1 wherein said substrate is positioned
`
`against said light guide.
`
`2
`
`

`

`Claim 5 (original): The assembly of claim 1 wherein said substrate covers said at
`
`least one surface of said light guide.
`
`Claim 6 (original): The assembly of claim 1 wherein said deformities are at least
`
`one of depressions and raised surfaces on said one surface of said light guide.
`
`Claim 7 (original): The assembly of claim 1 wherein said deformities vary on said
`
`one surface of said light guide.
`
`Claim 8 (original): The assembly of claim 1 wherein at least one of said
`
`deformities is at least one of prismatic, lenticular and other device that changes
`
`the output ray angle distribution.
`
`Claim 9 (canceled)
`
`Claim 10 (currently amended): The assembly of claim 1 wherein said light
`
`emitting diodes sources are attached to a circuit.
`
`Claim 11 (currently amended): The assembly of claim 1 wherein said light
`
`emitting diodes sources are embedded, potted, bonded or molded into said light
`
`guide.
`
`3
`
`

`

`Claim 12 (original): The assembly of claim 1 wherein said deformities are on
`
`more than one surface of said light guide.
`
`Claim 13 (original): The assembly of claim 1 wherein said deformities are on two
`
`sides of said light guide.
`
`Claim 14 (original): The assembly of claim 1 wherein at least some deformities
`
`are on said substrate.
`
`Claim 15 (original): The assembly of claim 1 wherein said substrate has at least
`
`one of a prismatic lens, lenticular lens, and other device that changes the output
`
`ray angle distribution.
`
`Claim 16 (original): The assembly of claim 1 wherein more than one said
`
`substrate overlies said light guide.
`
`Claim 17 (currently amended): A—light—emitting—assembly—fer—vehiele—immnatien
`
`
`
`The assembly of claim 1 wherein said substrate has deformities on at least one
`
`
`surface of said substrate said deformities on said substrate having shapes for
`
`controlling an output ray angle distribution of emitted light to suit a particular
`
`4
`
`

`

`application, the deformities on at least one of said light guide and said substrate
`
`varying in at least one of the following characteristics: size, shape, placement,
`
`index of refraction, density, angle, depth, height and type.
`
`Claim 18 (original): The assembly of claim 17 wherein the variations in the
`
`deformities are random.
`
`Claim 19 (original): The assembly of claim 17 wherein said substrate comprises
`
`at least one of a sheet, film, lens and plate.
`
`Claim 20 (original): The assembly of claim 17 wherein said substrate has
`
`reflective and refractive surfaces.
`
`Claim 21 (original): The assembly of claim 17 wherein said substrate has a
`
`coafing.
`
`Claim 22 (original): The assembly of claim 17 wherein more than one said
`
`substrate overlies said light guide.
`
`Claim 23 (original): The assembly of claim 17 wherein at least one surface of at
`
`least one of said substrate and said light guide is prismatic or lenticular.
`
`Claims 24 and 25 (canceled)
`
`5
`
`

`

`Claim 26 (currently amended): The assembly of claim 25 1 wherein at least one
`
`of said light guide and said substrate has at least one of a coating and surface
`
`treatment that changes, wherein the changes in said at least one of the coating
`
`and surface treatment are at least one of the following: density, color, index of
`
`refraction, reflection, opaqueness, translucence, area, depth, shape, size and
`
`type.
`
`Claim 27 (original): The assembly of claim 26 wherein said at least one of the
`
`coating and surface treatment are at least one of the following: paint, ink, coating
`
`and epoxy.
`
`Claim 28 (original): The assembly of claim 26 wherein the coating is selected to
`
`improve at least one of the following: color correction, opaqueness, diffusion,
`
`reflection, translucence and transmission of light.
`
`Claim 29 (original): The assembly of claim 26 wherein at least one surface of at
`
`least one of said light guide and said substrate is at least one of prismatic,
`
`lenticular and other device that changes the output ray angle distribution.
`
`Claim 30 (original): The assembly of claim 26 wherein the coating on at least
`
`one of said light guide and said substrate randomly changes.
`
`6
`
`

`

`Claim 31 (original): The assembly of claim 26 wherein the surface treatment of
`
`at least one of said light guide and said substrate randomly changes.
`
`Claim 32 (original): The assembly of claim 26 wherein at least one surface of at
`
`least one of said light guide and said substrate varies in shape or geometry.
`
`Claim 33 (original): The assembly of claim 32 wherein the shape or geometry of
`
`said one surface randomly varies.
`
`Claims 34-52 (canceled)
`
`Claim 53 (new):
`
`The assembly of claim 1 wherein said substrate provides
`
`protection for the light guide.
`
`Claim 54 (new):
`
`The assembly of claim 1 wherein there are a plurality of said
`
`light emitting diodes along said light input surface.
`
`Claim 55 (new):
`
`The assembly of claim 1 wherein at least some of said
`
`deformities include prismatic surfaces having angles that vary.
`
`7
`
`

`

`REMARKS/ARGUMENTS
`
`Claims 1-8, 10-23, 26-33 and 53-55 remain in the application. Claims 9,
`
`24, 25 and 34-52 are canceled. Claims 1-8, 10-23 and 53-55 read on the elected
`
`Species 1. Claims 26-33 are withdrawn from consideration.
`
`Claims 1-6, 8, 10, 14-17, 19, 20, 22 and 23 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. §
`
`102(a) as being anticipated by Nakamura (US. 5,467,417). However, Nakamura
`
`relates to a prism plate which emits light to an indicator such as a liquid crystal
`
`indicator incorporating such a prism plate that is used for information indication in
`
`information processors such as personal computers, word processors and the
`
`like (see column 1, lines 11-19), not a light emitting assembly for vehicle
`
`illumination. According to the Examiner, the recitation with respect to the
`
`assembly being for vehicle illumination has not been given patentable weight
`
`because the manner in which the claimed apparatus is intended to be used does
`
`not differentiate the claimed apparatus from the cited prior art apparatus
`
`satisfying the claimed structural limitations. However, claim 1 has been
`
`amended to differentiate the claimed apparatus from Nakamura satisfying the
`
`claimed structural limitations by reciting that the substrate of the claimed light
`
`emitting assembly provides an exterior portion of a vehicle forvehicle illumination
`
`at said exterior portion, in a manner clearly nowhere disclosed or suggested in
`
`Nakamura. Accordingly, claim 1 is submitted as clearly allowable.
`
`Claims 2-6, 8, 10, 14-17, 19, 20, 22 and 23 depend from claim 1 and are
`
`also submitted as clearly allowable.
`
`8
`
`

`

`Claims 7, 11-13, 18 and 21 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as
`
`being unpatentable over Nakamura. However, these claims depend from claim 1
`
`and are submitted as allowable for substantially the same reasons. Moreover, at
`
`least claims 7, 12, 13, 18 and 21 further patentably distinguish over Nakamura by
`
`reciting other novel features in the claimed combination. Claim 7 recites that the
`
`deformities vary on said one surface of said light guide; claims 12 and 13 recite
`
`that said deformities are on more than one surface/two sides of said light guide;
`
`claim 18 recites that the variations in the deformities are random; and claim 21
`
`recites that the substrate has a coating. The Examiner acknowledges that
`
`Nakamura does not disclose these claim features, but contends that it would
`
`have been obvious to utilize any of these features for the purposes of providing
`
`the diffused light with the appropriate intensity profile which suits the particular
`
`liquid crystal display. However, applicants’ claimed invention is for a light
`
`emitting assembly for vehicle illumination wherein the substrate provides an
`
`exterior portion of a vehicle for vehicle illumination at the exterior portion; not to
`
`provide illumination of a liquid crystal display. Accordingly, it is respectfully
`
`submitted that the Examiner has modified Nakamura in light of applicants'
`
`present teachings and certainly not from any teachings or suggestions found in
`
`the prior art, which is clearly improper.
`
`Claims 53-55 also depend from claim 1 and are submitted as allowable for
`
`substantially the same reasons in addition to reciting other novel features in the
`
`claimed combination. Claim 53 recites that the substrate provides protection for
`
`the light guide; claim 54 recites that there are a plurality of light emitting diodes
`
`9
`
`

`

`along the light input surface for supplying light to the light guide; and claim 55
`
`recites that at least some of the deformities include prismatic surfaces having
`
`angles that vary.
`
`Claims 26-33 are withdrawn. However, withdrawn claims 26-33 depend
`
`from claim 1 and are also submitted as allowable.
`
`For the foregoing reasons, this application is now believed to be in
`
`condition for allowance of all of thelpending claims 1-8, 10-23, 26-33 and 53-55,
`
`and early action to that end is earnestly solicited. Should the Examiner‘disagree
`
`with applicants’ attorney in any respect, it is respectfully requested that the
`
`Examiner telephone applicants’ attorney in an effort to resolve such differences.
`
`In the event that an extension of time is necessary, this should be
`
`considered a petition for such an extension.
`
`If required, fees are enclosed for the
`
`extension of time and/or for the presentation of new and/or amended claims.
`
`In
`
`the event any additional fees are due in connection with the filing of this
`
`amendment, the Commissioner is authorized to charge those fees to our Deposit
`
`Account No. 18-0988 (Charge No. GLOLPO106USD).
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`RENNER, OTTO, BOISSELLE & SKLAR, LLP
`
`
`By/' K
`Donald L. Otto, Registration No. 22,125
`
`1621 Euclid Avenue
`
`Nineteenth Floor
`
`Cleveland, Ohio 44115-2191
`Phone:
`216-621-1113
`
`Fax:
`
`216-621-6165
`
`Z:\SEC177\GLOL\P1OSD\REPLY TO DA OF 2-12-04.doc
`
`10
`
`10
`
`10
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket