`Volkswagen Group of America, Inc., Petitioner
`
`1
`
`
`
`Amendments to the Claims:
`
`This listing of claims will replace all prior versions, and listings, of claims in the
`
`application.
`
`Listing of Claims:
`
`Claim 1 (currently amended): A light emitting assembly for vehicle illumination
`
`comprising a light guide having at least one light input surface, one or more light
`
`emitting diodes a—plurality—ef—elesely—spaeed—light—seurees along said light input
`
`surface for supplying light to said light guide, a plurality of light extracting
`
`deformities on at least one surface of said light guide, said deformities having
`
`shapes for controlling an output ray angle distribution of emitted light to suit a
`
`particular application, and a transparent substrate overlying at least one surface
`
`of said light guide, said substrate providing an exterior portion of a vehicle for
`
`vehicle illumination at said exterior portion.
`
`Claim 2 (original): The assembly of claim 1 wherein said substrate comprises at
`
`least one of a sheet, film, lens and plate.
`
`Claim 3 (original): The assembly of claim 1 wherein said substrate is attached to
`
`said light guide.
`
`Claim 4 (original): The assembly of claim 1 wherein said substrate is positioned
`
`against said light guide.
`
`2
`
`
`
`Claim 5 (original): The assembly of claim 1 wherein said substrate covers said at
`
`least one surface of said light guide.
`
`Claim 6 (original): The assembly of claim 1 wherein said deformities are at least
`
`one of depressions and raised surfaces on said one surface of said light guide.
`
`Claim 7 (original): The assembly of claim 1 wherein said deformities vary on said
`
`one surface of said light guide.
`
`Claim 8 (original): The assembly of claim 1 wherein at least one of said
`
`deformities is at least one of prismatic, lenticular and other device that changes
`
`the output ray angle distribution.
`
`Claim 9 (canceled)
`
`Claim 10 (currently amended): The assembly of claim 1 wherein said light
`
`emitting diodes sources are attached to a circuit.
`
`Claim 11 (currently amended): The assembly of claim 1 wherein said light
`
`emitting diodes sources are embedded, potted, bonded or molded into said light
`
`guide.
`
`3
`
`
`
`Claim 12 (original): The assembly of claim 1 wherein said deformities are on
`
`more than one surface of said light guide.
`
`Claim 13 (original): The assembly of claim 1 wherein said deformities are on two
`
`sides of said light guide.
`
`Claim 14 (original): The assembly of claim 1 wherein at least some deformities
`
`are on said substrate.
`
`Claim 15 (original): The assembly of claim 1 wherein said substrate has at least
`
`one of a prismatic lens, lenticular lens, and other device that changes the output
`
`ray angle distribution.
`
`Claim 16 (original): The assembly of claim 1 wherein more than one said
`
`substrate overlies said light guide.
`
`Claim 17 (currently amended): A—light—emitting—assembly—fer—vehiele—immnatien
`
`
`
`The assembly of claim 1 wherein said substrate has deformities on at least one
`
`
`surface of said substrate said deformities on said substrate having shapes for
`
`controlling an output ray angle distribution of emitted light to suit a particular
`
`4
`
`
`
`application, the deformities on at least one of said light guide and said substrate
`
`varying in at least one of the following characteristics: size, shape, placement,
`
`index of refraction, density, angle, depth, height and type.
`
`Claim 18 (original): The assembly of claim 17 wherein the variations in the
`
`deformities are random.
`
`Claim 19 (original): The assembly of claim 17 wherein said substrate comprises
`
`at least one of a sheet, film, lens and plate.
`
`Claim 20 (original): The assembly of claim 17 wherein said substrate has
`
`reflective and refractive surfaces.
`
`Claim 21 (original): The assembly of claim 17 wherein said substrate has a
`
`coafing.
`
`Claim 22 (original): The assembly of claim 17 wherein more than one said
`
`substrate overlies said light guide.
`
`Claim 23 (original): The assembly of claim 17 wherein at least one surface of at
`
`least one of said substrate and said light guide is prismatic or lenticular.
`
`Claims 24 and 25 (canceled)
`
`5
`
`
`
`Claim 26 (currently amended): The assembly of claim 25 1 wherein at least one
`
`of said light guide and said substrate has at least one of a coating and surface
`
`treatment that changes, wherein the changes in said at least one of the coating
`
`and surface treatment are at least one of the following: density, color, index of
`
`refraction, reflection, opaqueness, translucence, area, depth, shape, size and
`
`type.
`
`Claim 27 (original): The assembly of claim 26 wherein said at least one of the
`
`coating and surface treatment are at least one of the following: paint, ink, coating
`
`and epoxy.
`
`Claim 28 (original): The assembly of claim 26 wherein the coating is selected to
`
`improve at least one of the following: color correction, opaqueness, diffusion,
`
`reflection, translucence and transmission of light.
`
`Claim 29 (original): The assembly of claim 26 wherein at least one surface of at
`
`least one of said light guide and said substrate is at least one of prismatic,
`
`lenticular and other device that changes the output ray angle distribution.
`
`Claim 30 (original): The assembly of claim 26 wherein the coating on at least
`
`one of said light guide and said substrate randomly changes.
`
`6
`
`
`
`Claim 31 (original): The assembly of claim 26 wherein the surface treatment of
`
`at least one of said light guide and said substrate randomly changes.
`
`Claim 32 (original): The assembly of claim 26 wherein at least one surface of at
`
`least one of said light guide and said substrate varies in shape or geometry.
`
`Claim 33 (original): The assembly of claim 32 wherein the shape or geometry of
`
`said one surface randomly varies.
`
`Claims 34-52 (canceled)
`
`Claim 53 (new):
`
`The assembly of claim 1 wherein said substrate provides
`
`protection for the light guide.
`
`Claim 54 (new):
`
`The assembly of claim 1 wherein there are a plurality of said
`
`light emitting diodes along said light input surface.
`
`Claim 55 (new):
`
`The assembly of claim 1 wherein at least some of said
`
`deformities include prismatic surfaces having angles that vary.
`
`7
`
`
`
`REMARKS/ARGUMENTS
`
`Claims 1-8, 10-23, 26-33 and 53-55 remain in the application. Claims 9,
`
`24, 25 and 34-52 are canceled. Claims 1-8, 10-23 and 53-55 read on the elected
`
`Species 1. Claims 26-33 are withdrawn from consideration.
`
`Claims 1-6, 8, 10, 14-17, 19, 20, 22 and 23 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. §
`
`102(a) as being anticipated by Nakamura (US. 5,467,417). However, Nakamura
`
`relates to a prism plate which emits light to an indicator such as a liquid crystal
`
`indicator incorporating such a prism plate that is used for information indication in
`
`information processors such as personal computers, word processors and the
`
`like (see column 1, lines 11-19), not a light emitting assembly for vehicle
`
`illumination. According to the Examiner, the recitation with respect to the
`
`assembly being for vehicle illumination has not been given patentable weight
`
`because the manner in which the claimed apparatus is intended to be used does
`
`not differentiate the claimed apparatus from the cited prior art apparatus
`
`satisfying the claimed structural limitations. However, claim 1 has been
`
`amended to differentiate the claimed apparatus from Nakamura satisfying the
`
`claimed structural limitations by reciting that the substrate of the claimed light
`
`emitting assembly provides an exterior portion of a vehicle forvehicle illumination
`
`at said exterior portion, in a manner clearly nowhere disclosed or suggested in
`
`Nakamura. Accordingly, claim 1 is submitted as clearly allowable.
`
`Claims 2-6, 8, 10, 14-17, 19, 20, 22 and 23 depend from claim 1 and are
`
`also submitted as clearly allowable.
`
`8
`
`
`
`Claims 7, 11-13, 18 and 21 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as
`
`being unpatentable over Nakamura. However, these claims depend from claim 1
`
`and are submitted as allowable for substantially the same reasons. Moreover, at
`
`least claims 7, 12, 13, 18 and 21 further patentably distinguish over Nakamura by
`
`reciting other novel features in the claimed combination. Claim 7 recites that the
`
`deformities vary on said one surface of said light guide; claims 12 and 13 recite
`
`that said deformities are on more than one surface/two sides of said light guide;
`
`claim 18 recites that the variations in the deformities are random; and claim 21
`
`recites that the substrate has a coating. The Examiner acknowledges that
`
`Nakamura does not disclose these claim features, but contends that it would
`
`have been obvious to utilize any of these features for the purposes of providing
`
`the diffused light with the appropriate intensity profile which suits the particular
`
`liquid crystal display. However, applicants’ claimed invention is for a light
`
`emitting assembly for vehicle illumination wherein the substrate provides an
`
`exterior portion of a vehicle for vehicle illumination at the exterior portion; not to
`
`provide illumination of a liquid crystal display. Accordingly, it is respectfully
`
`submitted that the Examiner has modified Nakamura in light of applicants'
`
`present teachings and certainly not from any teachings or suggestions found in
`
`the prior art, which is clearly improper.
`
`Claims 53-55 also depend from claim 1 and are submitted as allowable for
`
`substantially the same reasons in addition to reciting other novel features in the
`
`claimed combination. Claim 53 recites that the substrate provides protection for
`
`the light guide; claim 54 recites that there are a plurality of light emitting diodes
`
`9
`
`
`
`along the light input surface for supplying light to the light guide; and claim 55
`
`recites that at least some of the deformities include prismatic surfaces having
`
`angles that vary.
`
`Claims 26-33 are withdrawn. However, withdrawn claims 26-33 depend
`
`from claim 1 and are also submitted as allowable.
`
`For the foregoing reasons, this application is now believed to be in
`
`condition for allowance of all of thelpending claims 1-8, 10-23, 26-33 and 53-55,
`
`and early action to that end is earnestly solicited. Should the Examiner‘disagree
`
`with applicants’ attorney in any respect, it is respectfully requested that the
`
`Examiner telephone applicants’ attorney in an effort to resolve such differences.
`
`In the event that an extension of time is necessary, this should be
`
`considered a petition for such an extension.
`
`If required, fees are enclosed for the
`
`extension of time and/or for the presentation of new and/or amended claims.
`
`In
`
`the event any additional fees are due in connection with the filing of this
`
`amendment, the Commissioner is authorized to charge those fees to our Deposit
`
`Account No. 18-0988 (Charge No. GLOLPO106USD).
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`RENNER, OTTO, BOISSELLE & SKLAR, LLP
`
`
`By/' K
`Donald L. Otto, Registration No. 22,125
`
`1621 Euclid Avenue
`
`Nineteenth Floor
`
`Cleveland, Ohio 44115-2191
`Phone:
`216-621-1113
`
`Fax:
`
`216-621-6165
`
`Z:\SEC177\GLOL\P1OSD\REPLY TO DA OF 2-12-04.doc
`
`10
`
`10
`
`10
`
`