throbber
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
` _________________
`
` BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
` ____________________
`
`Page 1
`
` FORD MOTOR COMPANY,
`
` Petitioner,
`
` -vs-
`
` PAICE, LLC & ABELL FOUNDATION, INC.,
`
` Patent Owner.
`
` _____________________
`
` U.S. Patent No. 7,237,634
`
` IPR Case Nos: IPR2015-790, IPR2015-791,
`
` IPR2015-784, IPR2015-787, IPR2015-794,
`
` IPR2015-795 and IPR2015-722
`
` ____________________
`
`
`
` Deposition of GREGORY DAVIS, PhD
` Friday, May 13, 2016
` Southfield, Michigan
` 9:35 a.m.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Reported by:
`Laura J. Steenbergh, CSR-3707, RPR, CRR, RMR
`Job no: 16341
`
`TransPerfect Legal Solutions
`212-400-8845 - Depo@TransPerfect.com
`
`PAICE 2314
`Ford v. Paice & Abell
`IPR2015-00795
`
`

`
`Page 2
`
` APPEARANCES:
`
` MR. JOHN RONDINI, ESQ.
`
` MR. ANDREW B. TURNER, ESQ.
`
` Brooks Kushman, P.C.
`
` 1000 Town Center, 22nd Floor
`
` Southfield, Michigan 48075
`
` (248) 358-4400
`
` jrondini@brookskushman.com
`
` aturner@brookskushman.com
`
` Appearing on behalf of the Petitioner.
`
` MR. BRIAN LIVEDALEN, ESQ.
`
` Fish & Richardson, P.C.
`
` 1425 K Street NW, 11th Floor
`
` Washington, DC 20005
`
` (202) 783-5050
`
` livedalen@fr.com
`
` Appearing on behalf of the Patent Owner.
`
` * * * *
`
`1
`
`2 3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`TransPerfect Legal Solutions
`212-400-8845 - Depo@TransPerfect.com
`
`

`
` TABLE OF CONTENTS
`
`Page 3
`
`Witness Page
`
`GREGORY DAVIS, PhD
`
`EXAMINATION BY MR. LIVEDALEN: 4
`
`EXAMINATION BY MR. RONDINI: 103
`
` INDEX TO EXHIBITS
`
` (Exhibits attached to transcript)
`
`Exhibit Page
`
` DAVIS EXHIBIT 1 G. Davis Reply to IPR 2014-00790 5
`
` DAVIS EXHIBIT 2 SAE Technical Paper 10
`
` DAVIS EXHIBIT 3 Hannemann Declaration 18
`
` DAVIS EXHIBIT 4 Suga Reference 22
`
` DAVIS EXHIBIT 5 Reply Declaration of G. Davis 36
`
` DAVIS EXHIBIT 6 '882 Ibaraki Patent 42
`
` DAVIS EXHIBIT 7 Declaration of Neil Hannemann 72
`
` DAVIS EXHIBIT 8 SAE SP 1331 102
`
`1
`
`2 3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`TransPerfect Legal Solutions
`212-400-8845 - Depo@TransPerfect.com
`
`

`
`Page 4
`
` Southfield, Michigan
`
` Friday, May 13, 2016
`
` About 9:35 a.m. 09:35:39AM
`
` MR. LIVEDALEN: Good morning, Dr. Davis. 09:35:39AM
`
` THE WITNESS: Good morning. 09:39:21AM
`
` GREGORY DAVIS, PhD, 09:39:21AM
`
` having first been duly sworn, was examined and testified 09:39:21AM
`
` on his oath as follows: 09:39:21AM
`
`EXAMINATION BY MR. LIVEDALEN: 09:39:21AM
`
`Q. Would you mind stating your full name for the record? 09:39:23AM
`
`A. Sure. Dr. Gregory W. Davis. 09:39:25AM
`
`Q. And you understand that you've taken an oath today? 09:39:28AM
`
`A. Yes, I do. 09:39:31AM
`
`Q. And it's the same as if you were testifying in court? 09:39:32AM
`
`A. Yes. 09:39:35AM
`
`Q. And I think you're familiar by now with the general 09:39:35AM
`
` procedures of the deposition, but I'll repeat some of 09:39:42AM
`
` the rules. 09:39:45AM
`
`A. Okay. 09:39:45AM
`
`Q. If you don't understand a question, please ask for 09:39:45AM
`
` clarification. If you can't hear a question or anything 09:39:48AM
`
` like that, just please let me know. Please answer in 09:39:53AM
`
` audible responses, yeses and nos. No head nods or head 09:39:57AM
`
` shakes. And if you want a break, just let me know. 09:40:03AM
`
` Any questions on your end? 09:40:06AM
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`TransPerfect Legal Solutions
`212-400-8845 - Depo@TransPerfect.com
`
`

`
`Page 5
`
`A. No. 09:40:09AM
`
`Q. All right. 09:40:10AM
`
`A. I think I'm ready. 09:40:10AM
`
`Q. Let's get going then. 09:40:12AM
`
` MR. LIVEDALEN: So I'm going to hand the 09:40:19AM
`
` witness what we'll mark as Exhibit Number 1. 09:40:21AM
`
` DAVIS EXHIBIT 1 09:40:39AM
`
` G. Davis Reply to IPR 2014-00790 09:40:39AM
`
` WAS MARKED BY THE REPORTER 09:40:39AM
`
` FOR IDENTIFICATION 09:40:39AM
`
`BY MR. LIVEDALEN: 09:40:39AM
`
`Q. Do you recognize Exhibit Number 1? 09:40:43AM
`
`A. Yes. 09:40:46AM
`
`Q. And what is it? 09:40:59AM
`
`A. It's my reply to IPR 2014-00790. 09:41:00AM
`
`Q. And if you turn to page two of Exhibit 1, you'll see a 09:41:08AM
`
` table of contents. Do you see that? 09:41:24AM
`
`A. Yes, I do. 09:41:25AM
`
`Q. And do you see Roman Numeral I, it talks about Ibaraki 09:41:26AM
`
` '882? 09:41:34AM
`
`A. Yes. 09:41:34AM
`
`Q. And that's what you refer to -- or strike that. 09:41:34AM
`
` So we refer to Ibaraki '882 as U.S. Patent 09:41:40AM
`
` Number 5,789,882, is that right? 09:41:46AM
`
`A. Yes. 09:41:50AM
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`TransPerfect Legal Solutions
`212-400-8845 - Depo@TransPerfect.com
`
`

`
`Page 6
`
`Q. And so for today's deposition we can call that the 09:41:55AM
`
` Ibaraki '882 reference? 09:42:00AM
`
`A. Sounds good. 09:42:02AM
`
`Q. Okay. So, Dr. Davis, why did you submit a reply 09:42:02AM
`
` declaration in IPR 2014-790? 09:42:16AM
`
`A. I was asked to. 09:42:19AM
`
`Q. And in preparing your reply declaration, did you review 09:42:20AM
`
` the declarations submitted by Mr. Hannemann in this 09:42:28AM
`
` matter? 09:42:32AM
`
`A. Yes, at least portions. I didn't look in detail at all 09:42:32AM
`
` sections, but yes. 09:42:35AM
`
`Q. So you didn't read the entire declaration? 09:42:37AM
`
`A. Well, I believe I read through the entire declaration, 09:42:45AM
`
` but I was only asked to focus on specific areas, so 09:42:48AM
`
` those were the areas that I actually really looked at 09:42:52AM
`
` closely. 09:42:57AM
`
`Q. Okay. Let's go to page 30 of Exhibit 1. And can you 09:42:58AM
`
` read the heading for me, heading number VI? 09:43:43AM
`
`A. Sure. Ground 6: Claims 67 and 79 are obvious over 09:43:46AM
`
` Ibaraki -- the one little kind of comma raised there -- 09:43:55AM
`
` '882 in view of Suga -- S-U-G-A. 09:44:05AM
`
`Q. And Suga is short for U.S. Patent Number 5,623,104, is 09:44:10AM
`
` that right? 09:44:16AM
`
`A. U.S. Patent 5,623,104. I believe that's what it said. 09:44:16AM
`
`Q. Can you read paragraph 59 from your declaration into the 09:44:28AM
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`TransPerfect Legal Solutions
`212-400-8845 - Depo@TransPerfect.com
`
`

`
`Page 7
`
` record? 09:44:44AM
`
`A. An -- it's A-N -- 1998 further explains that HEVs have 09:44:44AM
`
` various operational strategies, including: 09:44:57AM
`
` Charge-sustaining, charge-depleting, and zero emission 09:45:03AM
`
` vehicle (ZEV) capability. (Exhibit 1688, An 1998 at 8.) 09:45:09AM
`
` An also discloses that the sizing of the electric motor 09:45:22AM
`
` determines whether or not the HEV is capable of ZEV 09:45:26AM
`
` operation. 09:45:29AM
`
`Q. And so An is a reference that you're citing from 1998, 09:45:30AM
`
` is that right? 09:45:39AM
`
`A. I believe so. 09:45:40AM
`
`Q. And as it states here, An discloses that the sizing of 09:45:41AM
`
` the electric motor determines whether or not the HEV is 09:45:48AM
`
` capable of ZEV operation, is that your opinion? 09:45:51AM
`
` MR. RONDINI: Objection, form. 09:45:55AM
`
` THE WITNESS: I said An also discloses that 09:45:55AM
`
` the sizing of the electric motor determines whether or 09:45:58AM
`
` not HEV is capable of ZEV operation. 09:46:01AM
`
`BY MR. LIVEDALEN: 09:46:04AM
`
`Q. But An does not state that ZEV operation has anything to 09:46:04AM
`
` do with whether or not the electric motor is 09:46:11AM
`
` sufficiently powerful to provide acceleration of a 09:46:14AM
`
` hybrid sufficient -- of a hybrid sufficient to conform 09:46:17AM
`
` to the Federal Urban Cycle Driving Fuel Mileage Test, 09:46:20AM
`
` right? 09:46:25AM
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`TransPerfect Legal Solutions
`212-400-8845 - Depo@TransPerfect.com
`
`

`
`Page 8
`
` MR. RONDINI: Objection to form, vague. 09:46:25AM
`
` THE WITNESS: I don't know. I'd have to look 09:46:26AM
`
` at a copy of An. There's an awful lot of stuff here. 09:46:28AM
`
`BY MR. LIVEDALEN: 09:46:32AM
`
`Q. But you don't cite any evidence in your declaration to 09:46:32AM
`
` that point, right? 09:46:34AM
`
` MR. RONDINI: Objection, mischaracterizes his 09:46:35AM
`
` testimony. 09:46:36AM
`
` THE WITNESS: Basically I said An also 09:46:37AM
`
` discloses that the sizing of the electric motor 09:46:38AM
`
` determines whether or not the HEV is capable of ZEV 09:46:42AM
`
` operation. 09:46:46AM
`
`BY MR. LIVEDALEN: 09:46:46AM
`
`Q. But you didn't provide any evidence or opinions 09:46:47AM
`
` connecting the ZEV operation to whether or not the motor 09:46:49AM
`
` would be sufficiently powerful to provide acceleration 09:46:53AM
`
` to conform to the Federal Urban Cycle Driving Fuel 09:46:54AM
`
` Mileage Test, right? 09:46:56AM
`
` MR. RONDINI: Objection, mischaracterizes 09:46:57AM
`
` testimony. 09:47:02AM
`
` THE WITNESS: Again, I don't have the benefit 09:47:02AM
`
` of having An in front of me here, so I can't go totally 09:47:05AM
`
` from memory on this, but basically this is what I said. 09:47:08AM
`
` An also discloses that the sizing of the electric motor 09:47:11AM
`
` determines whether or not the HEV is capable of ZEV 09:47:14AM
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`TransPerfect Legal Solutions
`212-400-8845 - Depo@TransPerfect.com
`
`

`
`Page 9
`
` operation. 09:47:18AM
`
`BY MR. LIVEDALEN: 09:47:18AM
`
`Q. But you don't have any evidence or opinion in your 09:47:18AM
`
` declaration here about connecting ZEV operation to 09:47:22AM
`
` whether or not an electric motor in a hybrid vehicle is 09:47:25AM
`
` sufficiently powerful to provide acceleration to conform 09:47:28AM
`
` to the Federal Urban Cycle Driving Fuel Mileage Test, 09:47:31AM
`
` right? 09:47:36AM
`
` MR. RONDINI: Objection, mischaracterizes 09:47:36AM
`
` testimony. 09:47:37AM
`
` THE WITNESS: Again, what I said is, An also 09:47:38AM
`
` discloses that the sizing of the electric motor 09:47:40AM
`
` determines whether or not the HEV is capable of ZEV 09:47:43AM
`
` operation. 09:47:47AM
`
`BY MR. LIVEDALEN: 09:47:47AM
`
`Q. Right. So I'm not asking about what you did say, I'm 09:47:48AM
`
` asking about what you didn't say. So do you see an 09:47:51AM
`
` opinion in your declaration that ties ZEV operation 09:47:55AM
`
` capability to whether or not a motor in a hybrid vehicle 09:48:00AM
`
` is sufficiently powerful to provide acceleration of the 09:48:05AM
`
` hybrid vehicle sufficient to conform to the Federal 09:48:10AM
`
` Urban Cycle Driving Fuel Mileage Test? 09:48:13AM
`
` MR. RONDINI: Same objection. 09:48:16AM
`
` THE WITNESS: Well, again, this is what I've 09:48:17AM
`
` said here about An. And as I go on to say, you know, 09:48:19AM
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`TransPerfect Legal Solutions
`212-400-8845 - Depo@TransPerfect.com
`
`

`
`Page 10
`
` that -- and actually if we go back a little bit, you 09:48:24AM
`
` have to remember, ZEV mode of operation is a mode of 09:48:27AM
`
` operation that was widely understood by people. And in 09:48:34AM
`
` order to be able to provide a vehicle with ZEV mode of 09:48:38AM
`
` operation it has to meet, without the assistance of the 09:48:43AM
`
` engine, it has to meet the acceleration demands, the 09:48:46AM
`
` drivability demands placed on the vehicle. 09:48:51AM
`
` MR. LIVEDALEN: All right. Let's mark the An 09:49:00AM
`
` reference as Exhibit 2. 09:49:02AM
`
` DAVIS EXHIBIT 2 09:49:18AM
`
` SAE Technical Paper 09:49:18AM
`
` WAS MARKED BY THE REPORTER 09:49:18AM
`
` FOR IDENTIFICATION 09:49:19AM
`
`BY MR. LIVEDALEN: 09:49:19AM
`
`Q. All right. So can you identify Exhibit 2 for me? 09:49:29AM
`
`A. Yes. It's the SAE technical paper from 1998, 981902, 09:49:33AM
`
` and it's entitled, Critical Issues in Quantifying Hybrid 09:49:41AM
`
` Electric Vehicle Emissions and Fuel Consumption. 09:49:45AM
`
`Q. All right. Let's go to page eight. And this is the 09:49:48AM
`
` page you cite in paragraph 59, right? 09:50:07AM
`
`A. Yes, that is the page. 09:50:48AM
`
`Q. Okay. So now that you have the An reference in front of 09:50:49AM
`
` you, my question is, where in An does he tie ZEV 09:50:52AM
`
` operation to whether or not the electric motor of a 09:51:02AM
`
` hybrid is sufficiently powerful to provide acceleration 09:51:04AM
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`TransPerfect Legal Solutions
`212-400-8845 - Depo@TransPerfect.com
`
`

`
`Page 11
`
` of the hybrid vehicle sufficient to conform to the 09:51:07AM
`
` Federal Urban Cycle Driving Fuel Mileage Test? 09:51:11AM
`
`A. Well, at the beginning of the paper, actually in the 09:51:14AM
`
` introduction, they talk about an electric vehicle, and 09:51:21AM
`
` in -- this is the right-hand column on page one -- and 09:51:27AM
`
` they talk about the five driving cycles applied to the 09:51:33AM
`
` simulation models include: 1) EPA's Highway Cycle 09:51:37AM
`
` (HWY); 2) EPA's City Cycle (LA4); 3) California Air 09:51:44AM
`
` Resources Board (CARB) Unified LA 92 Cycle; 4) the New 09:51:54AM
`
` York City Cycle (NYC); and 5) the US06 Cycle (US06). 09:52:02AM
`
` And so they're talking about the LA4 cycle, 09:52:13AM
`
` the EPA City Cycle, which is commonly known as the FUDDS 09:52:17AM
`
` test -- all caps F-U-D-S or often now F-U-D-D-S. 09:52:29AM
`
`Q. And so where in the An reference does it say that the 09:52:33AM
`
` motor of a hybrid vehicle needs to be sufficiently 09:52:36AM
`
` powerful to provide sufficient acceleration to meet the 09:52:39AM
`
` FUDDS test? 09:52:43AM
`
`A. Well, again, one of ordinary skill in the art would 09:52:44AM
`
` understand when they're looking at page 8 of 21, ZEV 09:52:47AM
`
` Operation Capability, if an HEV is capable of operating 09:52:52AM
`
` entirely in electric mode only, i.e., the APU is not 09:52:56AM
`
` used, then it is referred to as ZEV operation capable. 09:53:01AM
`
` On the other hand, the electric motor may be 09:53:06AM
`
` sized too small for practical driving speeds to allow 09:53:09AM
`
` for ZEV operation. In this case the HEV is ZEV 09:53:12AM
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`TransPerfect Legal Solutions
`212-400-8845 - Depo@TransPerfect.com
`
`

`
`Page 12
`
` operation incapable. 09:53:19AM
`
` And so what he's talking about there is the 09:53:20AM
`
` ZEV mode of operation that most people were interested 09:53:22AM
`
` in trying to use is the city mode of operation. For 09:53:26AM
`
` example, many cities in Europe were at the time 09:53:32AM
`
` considering banning the use of IC engines in city 09:53:37AM
`
` centers. I believe that California, the CARB, was also 09:53:41AM
`
` considering some similar proposals in the LA area. So 09:53:49AM
`
` in order to provide ZEV operation only you would have to 09:53:58AM
`
` meet the driving demands required in the city. And, of 09:54:01AM
`
` course, the standard test for city driving is the FUDDS 09:54:04AM
`
` test. 09:54:11AM
`
`Q. All right. So let's focus on the bullet point on the 09:54:11AM
`
` bottom right-hand corner you've been talking about 09:54:14AM
`
` labeled ZEV Operation Capability. Where in that 09:54:16AM
`
` paragraph does it talk about acceleration? 09:54:19AM
`
`A. Well, again, one of ordinary skill in the art would 09:54:24AM
`
` understand that it says, On the other hand, the electric 09:54:27AM
`
` motor may be sized too small for practical driving 09:54:30AM
`
` speeds to allow for ZEV operation. In this case the HEV 09:54:33AM
`
` is ZEV-operation incapable. 09:54:39AM
`
`Q. It says driving speeds, right, not acceleration? 09:54:42AM
`
`A. Well, sometimes people speak a little bit loosely, but 09:54:45AM
`
` everybody -- one of ordinary skill in the art would 09:54:48AM
`
` understand that what we're talking about is being able 09:54:51AM
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`TransPerfect Legal Solutions
`212-400-8845 - Depo@TransPerfect.com
`
`

`
`Page 13
`
` to meet the drivability demands to drive in the city. 09:54:53AM
`
`Q. But there's -- the word city's also not in this 09:54:56AM
`
` paragraph, right? 09:55:00AM
`
`A. Well, because one of ordinary skill in the art would 09:55:00AM
`
` understand that ZEV mode is being discussed for city 09:55:03AM
`
` driving. Not for highway driving, but for city driving. 09:55:07AM
`
` And, again, the standard test for city driving is the 09:55:13AM
`
` FUDDS test. 09:55:16AM
`
`Q. All right. For my next question let's focus on what's 09:55:17AM
`
` in the reference and not what you think someone of 09:55:21AM
`
` ordinary skill in the art would read into the reference. 09:55:25AM
`
`A. Well, it is in -- I mean, you know, you're taking one 09:55:28AM
`
` small snippet out of context here, but, you know, when 09:55:31AM
`
` you look at the entire reference, then you get a better 09:55:35AM
`
` understanding. 09:55:38AM
`
`Q. But you'd agree with me, right, that the word 09:55:38AM
`
` acceleration is not in the bullet point paragraph 09:55:41AM
`
` labeled ZEV Operation Capability? 09:55:43AM
`
` MR. RONDINI: Objection, form, vague. 09:55:45AM
`
` THE WITNESS: Actually the word acceleration 09:55:47AM
`
` is in there. Oh, I'm sorry, I turned to the wrong page. 09:55:48AM
`
` I was looking at the last paragraph in the two pages 09:55:53AM
`
` before. 09:55:56AM
`
` The word acceleration is not in that 09:56:04AM
`
` paragraph. But again -- 09:56:05AM
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`TransPerfect Legal Solutions
`212-400-8845 - Depo@TransPerfect.com
`
`

`
`Page 14
`
` MR. LIVEDALEN: That's my only question. 09:56:07AM
`
` MR. RONDINI: Well, let the witness answer. 09:56:07AM
`
` THE WITNESS: Again, you're trying to take a 09:56:09AM
`
` snippet out of context and I don't think that's proper. 09:56:13AM
`
` I mean, you have to understand that he's clearly talking 09:56:15AM
`
` about ZEV operation capabilities meaning that the 09:56:17AM
`
` vehicle's going to meet all the drivability requirements 09:56:25AM
`
` using just the electric motor in the ZEV mode and that 09:56:28AM
`
` the ZEV mode is the mode of operation that you would use 09:56:31AM
`
` in city driving. 09:56:34AM
`
`BY MR. LIVEDALEN: 09:56:36AM
`
`Q. So you'd agree with me, right, that the word city 09:56:40AM
`
` driving is also not in the paragraph bullet pointed ZEV 09:56:42AM
`
` Operation Capability? 09:56:45AM
`
` MR. RONDINI: Objection, form. 09:56:48AM
`
` THE WITNESS: Again, you're taking that out of 09:56:49AM
`
` context. I mean, one of ordinary skill in the art when 09:56:51AM
`
` reading this SAE paper would understand the moment you 09:56:53AM
`
` mention ZEV operation that you're gauging this for city 09:56:58AM
`
` operation. Because that was at the time and still is a 09:57:03AM
`
` discussion about zones of operation in city centers that 09:57:08AM
`
` will be IC engine -- will not allow IC engine operation. 09:57:13AM
`
` And so one of ordinary skill in the art would fully 09:57:18AM
`
` understand that. 09:57:22AM
`
` MR. LIVEDALEN: Going forward, to be clear, if 09:57:27AM
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`TransPerfect Legal Solutions
`212-400-8845 - Depo@TransPerfect.com
`
`

`
`Page 15
`
` I ask you about what's in a particular part of the 09:57:30AM
`
` reference, that was my question. If I ask you about 09:57:32AM
`
` what one of skill in the art would understand from that, 09:57:35AM
`
` then that's a separate question. 09:57:40AM
`
`BY MR. LIVEDALEN: 09:57:41AM
`
`Q. So you'd agree with me, right, that ZEV operation 09:57:41AM
`
` capability -- or, strike that. 09:57:44AM
`
` You'd agree with me that the paragraph that 09:57:47AM
`
` says ZEV operation capability does not state anything 09:57:48AM
`
` about the FUDDS test, right? 09:57:52AM
`
` MR. RONDINI: Objection, form. 09:57:54AM
`
` THE WITNESS: I would agree that it is not 09:57:55AM
`
` explicitly in that paragraph, but, again, as I've stated 09:57:59AM
`
` a few times now, one of ordinary skill in the art would 09:58:02AM
`
` understand that that would be the discussion that is at 09:58:05AM
`
` hand there. 09:58:08AM
`
`BY MR. LIVEDALEN: 09:58:09AM
`
`Q. Okay. And you'd also agree with me that, on this 09:58:14AM
`
` discussion of ZEV operation capability, it does not say 09:58:19AM
`
` anything about the relative sizing of the electric motor 09:58:24AM
`
` as compared to the size of the engine, right? 09:58:27AM
`
` MR. RONDINI: Objection to form. 09:58:29AM
`
` THE WITNESS: Well, actually it is talking 09:58:30AM
`
` about electric motor sizing. And, of course, if you did 09:58:40AM
`
` nothing to the engine and changed the size of the 09:58:47AM
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`TransPerfect Legal Solutions
`212-400-8845 - Depo@TransPerfect.com
`
`

`
`Page 16
`
` electric motor, then you are changing that relationship. 09:58:51AM
`
`BY MR. LIVEDALEN: 09:58:54AM
`
`Q. But there's nowhere in An that tells you to size your 09:58:55AM
`
` motor relative to the size of the engine, right? 09:58:59AM
`
`A. Well, as I just said, that if you are changing the size 09:59:05AM
`
` of your electric motor, and even if you did nothing to 09:59:09AM
`
` the engine, you are changing the relative size, the 09:59:12AM
`
` relative power distribution, torque distribution. 09:59:15AM
`
`Q. But An does not say to use the engine size as a 09:59:20AM
`
` benchmark to size your motor, right? 09:59:27AM
`
` MR. RONDINI: Objection, form. 09:59:28AM
`
` THE WITNESS: Again, here An is focusing on 09:59:30AM
`
` the ZEV operation here. And as I say, that if you're 09:59:39AM
`
` changing the size of the electric motor, even if you did 09:59:44AM
`
` nothing to the size of the engine, you are changing the 09:59:47AM
`
` relationship. 09:59:49AM
`
`BY MR. LIVEDALEN: 09:59:50AM
`
`Q. I'm not asking about the relationship, I'm asking about 09:59:51AM
`
` whether or not An uses the engine as a benchmark to size 09:59:54AM
`
` the motor. 09:59:59AM
`
`A. Well, of course, An is going to look at all of the 10:00:06AM
`
` relationships. You know, for example, if I increase the 10:00:11AM
`
` size of my electric motor in order to meet the FUDDS 10:00:17AM
`
` test for ZEV capability, that would often require a 10:00:20AM
`
` potential increase in size of the battery pack as well, 10:00:30AM
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`TransPerfect Legal Solutions
`212-400-8845 - Depo@TransPerfect.com
`
`

`
`Page 17
`
` and you have to remember in hybrid electric vehicles 10:00:35AM
`
` we're very weight conscious and we're very conscious 10:00:38AM
`
` about the fact that one of the benefits of the hybrid is 10:00:42AM
`
` that if it's a parallel or a serious parallel hybrid 10:00:45AM
`
` vehicle, that we're able to use the power and torque 10:00:50AM
`
` availability of both the electric motor and the engine 10:00:53AM
`
` to propel the vehicle. So if I'm making an electric 10:00:58AM
`
` motor larger, then I have the option to make the engine 10:01:01AM
`
` smaller in relation to that. And often I would have the 10:01:05AM
`
` motivation to do that because I'm trying to reduce or 10:01:09AM
`
` maintain a weight limitation for the hybrid vehicle. 10:01:13AM
`
` And also cost is an issue as well. 10:01:17AM
`
`Q. But An doesn't tell you to pick your motor size 10:01:20AM
`
` according to the size of the engine, right? 10:01:27AM
`
` MR. RONDINI: Objection, asked and answered. 10:01:29AM
`
` THE WITNESS: I think I have answered that, 10:01:30AM
`
` and that you're looking at the relationship of the whole 10:01:35AM
`
` vehicle as a system. And so, therefore, you are looking 10:01:38AM
`
` at always the relationship between the size of the 10:01:42AM
`
` electric motor and the size of the engine. 10:01:45AM
`
` MR. LIVEDALEN: So I'm not asking you about 10:01:48AM
`
` your opinion, I'm asking about what An says. 10:01:50AM
`
`BY MR. LIVEDALEN: 10:01:50AM
`
`Q. Does An say anywhere that he's sizing his motor based on 10:01:52AM
`
` the size of the engine? 10:02:01AM
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`TransPerfect Legal Solutions
`212-400-8845 - Depo@TransPerfect.com
`
`

`
`Page 18
`
` MR. RONDINI: Objection, form. 10:02:02AM
`
` THE WITNESS: Again, as I explained, one of 10:02:03AM
`
` ordinary skill

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket