throbber
[19]
`United States Patent
`6,116,363
`[11] Patent Number:
`[45] Date of Patent: *Sep. 12, 2000
`Frank
`
`
`
`US006116363A
`
`[54] FUEL CONSUMPTION CONTROL FOR
`CHARGE DEPLETION HYBRID ELECTRIC
`VEHICLES
`
`[75]
`
`Inventor: Andrew A. Frank, El Macero, Calif.
`
`[73] Assignee: Frank Transportation Technology,
`LLC, El Macero, Calif.
`
`[*] Notice:
`
`This patent is subject to a terminal dis-
`claimer.
`
`[21] Appl. No.2 09/063,995
`
`[22]
`
`Filed:
`
`Apr. 21, 1998
`
`Related US. Application Data
`
`[63]
`
`Continuation—in—part of application No. 08/963,037, NOV. 3,
`1997, Pat. No. 5,842,534, which is a continuation of appli—
`cation No. 08/455,104, May 31, 1995, abandoned.
`
`Int. Cl.7 ....................................................... B60K 6/04
`[51]
`[52] US. Cl.
`........................ 180/652; 180/654; 180/658
`[58] Field of Search .................................. 180/651, 65.2,
`180/653, 65.4, 65.8; 318/587; 701/22,
`36
`
`[56]
`
`References Cited
`U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS
`
`8/1977 Horwinski.
`4,042,056
`4,180,138 12/1979 Shea.
`4,269,280
`5/1981 Rosen.
`4,335,429
`6/1982 Kawakatsu.
`
`8/1983 Fiala .
`4,400,997
`8/1985 Heidemeyer et a1.
`4,533,011
`4,697,660 10/1987 Wu et al. .
`5,115,183
`5/1992 Kyoukane et a1.
`5,117,931
`6/1992 Nishida .
`5,343,970
`9/1994 Severinsky .
`5,923,025
`7/1999 Ellers .
`
`.
`
`.
`
`FOREIGN PATENT DOCUMENTS
`
`2310238
`2494642
`4206360
`
`France .
`1/1977
`France .
`5/1982
`9/1993 Germany .
`
`OTHER PUBLICATIONS
`
`Wood’s Gas—Electric Car, Instruction No. 80, Dyke’s Ency-
`clopedia, 1935.
`Frank et al., “Computer Simulation of the University of
`Wise. Hybrid—Electric Vehicle Concept”, May 1973.
`
`Primary Examiner—Michael Mar
`Attorney, Agent, or Firm—John P. O’Banion
`
`[57]
`
`ABSTRACT
`
`A charge depletion method and apparatus for operating the
`electric motor and auxiliary power unit, such as an internal
`combustion engine,
`in a hybrid electric vehicle (HEV)
`separately or together depending upon the driving condi-
`tions. Operation of the electric motor and auxiliary power
`unit are coordinated as a function of a control policy for the
`auxiliary power unit based on desired least fuel consumption
`and/or vehicle emissions characteristics.
`
`6 Claims, 7 Drawing Sheets
`
`16
`
`18
`
`20
`
`22
`
`
`MULTI—SPEED
`TRANSMISSION
`
`
`
`OR
`
`
`DRIVE WHEELS
`
`
`
`
`28
`
`
`
`BATTERIES
`
`
`
`INTERNAL
`
`COMBUSTION
`
`ENGINE
`
`
`
`26
`
`GENERATOR -----
`
`1of15
`
`FORD 1418
`
`1 of 15
`
`FORD 1418
`
`

`

`US. Patent
`
`Sep. 12, 2000
`
`Sheet 1 0f 7
`
`6,116,363
`
`
`
`m._m_m__._>>m>EQ
`
`ON9
`
`mo
`
`zO_mm=>_mz<m_._.
`owmmmlrfiaé
`mOPOEIO_m._.0m_u_m_m0—=NMU_._o._.3._o
`mZ_.OZm_|ZO_._.mDm_>_OO
`mmmE
`
`
`
`_.I.6."—
`
`mmEmE<mmm
`
`mmZAOmFZOO
`
`VN
`
`
`
`.....mok<mmzmw
`
`mm
`
`._<me._.2_
`
`20f15
`
`FORD 1418
`
`2 of 15
`
`FORD 1418
`
`
`
`

`

`US. Patent
`
`Sep. 12,2000
`
`Sheet 2 0f7
`
`6,116,363
`
`12
`CLUTCH
`
`
`
`.i. .-_| .CaNJBEBSNIEN
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`24a
`
`FRICTION
`
`
`
`
`
`14
`
`270
`
`
`
`Hevmooa
`
`
`flax/Aw
`III/AVA
`Vii/1%}-
`
`
`
`
`
`ICETURN—ONSPEED(KPH)
`
`
`(J Am
`fl/A 149x
`
`,6 (/1714(/11)
`'I/IW/AW/AVAZI
`OO
`BATTERY DEPTH 0F DISCHARGE (%DOD)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`25/
`
`50°/
`
`75°/o
`
`100%
`
`FIG. — 4
`
`3of15
`
`FORD 1418
`
`3 of 15
`
`FORD 1418
`
`

`

`US. Patent
`
`Sep. 12, 2000
`
`Sheet 3 0f 7
`
`6,116,363
`
`DmmDEm
`
`HmOOmm0“—
`
`AOIFZOODZ<
`
`mm;
`
`CON
`
`02
`
`._.<m9
`
`
`
`DZ<._.O>>
`
`I:_m_00<
`
`oGZ_._.<mm_
`
`._.<mo_
`
`m0_
`
`FIODOmm
`
`MZZZO
`
`m0_
`
`DMZEDF
`
`ZO
`
`
`
`mI.0."—
`
`wZ_<_>_m_m_
`
`mZ_._u_n_O
`
`mO_
`
`OZ
`
`om?
`
`IhnfioEmmmm
`
`mom<IomE“.0
`
`Ammmbm2<m<m
`
`00401mm???
`
`SE20ZEDF
`
`IOZD<._DZ<
`
`MJO_Im_>
`
`o:
`
`Pym/firm
`
`oow
`
`mmzmm
`
`m._0_Im_>
`
`Dmmmm
`
`mmZm—m
`
`>mm_.E.<m_
`
`u_OI._.n_mn_
`
`m®m<IOmE
`
`>Iml_.._.<m
`
`n_OI._.n_m_D
`
`_>_m_
`
`ZO_._.<m_m_Zm_mvm_m
`
`
`
`DMZIDHmDO_>_
`
`m0_DZ<ZO
`
`
`
`szmmOIOHDJO
`
`mm;
`
`CNN
`
`
`
`mm>>0m>>O._
`
`
`
`._<n_m_n_mx<mmQz<
`
`
`
`mo”.Qmmmmmmmo
`
`-Jmomo
`
` wZO_._.<m_m_
`
`ZOZED...
`
`>OZmOm—m=>_m_
`
`OZ_ZE<>>
`
`FIG]
`
`w0m<IOm5
`
`oo\oomA
`
`4of15
`
`FORD 1418
`
`4 of 15
`
`FORD 1418
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`US. Patent
`
`Sep. 12, 2000
`
`Sheet 4 0f 7
`
`6,116,363
`
`% of
`
`Travelers
`
`Commuters
`
`
`
`FIG. — 5
`
`0
`
`40
`Miles
`
`250
`
`Total Fuel
`Used (gal.)
`
`
`
`70 gal.
`1000 Vehicles
`
`FIG. — 6
`
`0
`
`40
`Miles
`
`250
`
`129
`
`
`
`
`
`ICETURN—ONSPEED(KPH)
`
` 32
`
`50%
`
`75%,
`
`100%
`
`oo0
`
`L‘
`
`V
`16 VII?
`00%
`25%
`
`BATTERY DEPTH OF DISCHARGE (%DOD)
`
`FIG. — 7
`
`5of15
`
`FORD 1418
`
`5 of 15
`
`FORD 1418
`
`

`

`US. Patent
`
`Sep. 12,2000
`
`Sheet 5 017
`
`6,116,363
`
`129
`
`A 113
`
`I0
`
`.
`=5, 96
`
`80
`
`n {
`
`H
`D.
`U)
`
`z 64"
`9z 48’
`
`n:
`
`32
`
`D '
`
`-
`LL!
`9
`
`16 y
`
`50%
`
`75%
`
`100%
`
`
`
`
`0 0%
`BATTERY DEPTH OF DISCHARGE (%DOD)
`
`25%
`
`FlG.—8
`
`129
`
`A113
`
`ID
`
`.
`g, 96
`
`Q H
`
`80
`
`i
`D.
`U)
`z 64
`‘1’
`z 48
`D:
`
`D E
`
`32
`9 u--m
`16 'WI
`0
`i
`
`0%
`
`25%
`
`50%
`
`75%
`
`100%
`
`BATTERY DEPTH OF DISCHARGE (%DOD)
`
`FlG.-9
`
`60f15
`
`FORD 1418
`
`6 of 15
`
`FORD 1418
`
`

`

`US. Patent
`
`Sep. 12, 2000
`
`Sheet 6 0f 7
`
`6,116,363
`
`9mm
`
`EO._.<m_m_n_m_OO<
`
`4<Dwn_
`
`9.
`
`zo_mm__>_mz<E.
`
`0mm
`
`OH
`
`zo_mm__>_mz<E
`
`m_O_
`
`19.540
`
`zo_mm=>_wz<m._.
`
`._.n=Imm<m0
`
`JOEHZOO
`
`>mm.E.<m
`
`mOm<IO
`
`mOmem
`
`JOEFZOO
`
`mEDDOE
`
`ION—0:2
`
`mOmmmOOmm
`
`m.._O_Im>
`
`Dmmmm
`
`mszmm
`
`
`
`0—.I.6.”—
`
`7of15
`
`FORD 1418
`
`7 of 15
`
`FORD 1418
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`US. Patent
`
`Sep. 12, 2000
`
`Sheet 7 0f 7
`
`6,116,363
`
`FIG. — 11
`
`I’
`
` I
`I EMII
`II
`,’ TORQU+E
`CONTROL
`
`330
`
`
`ACCELERATOR PEDAL
`
`EM REGEN "—"
`
`I
`
`TORQUE
`
`‘
`
`CONTROL
`
`340
`
`FIG. — 12
`
`. BRAKE PEDAL
`
`80f15
`
`FORD 1418
`
`8 of 15
`
`FORD 1418
`
`

`

`6,116,363
`
`1
`FUEL CONSUMPTION CONTROL FOR
`CHARGE DEPLETION HYBRID ELECTRIC
`VEHICLES
`
`CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED
`APPLICATIONS
`
`This application is a continuation-in-part of application
`Ser. No. 08/963,037 filed on Nov. 3, 1997, now Pat. No.
`5,842,534 which is a continuation of Ser. No. 08/455,104
`filed on May 31, 1995, now abandoned.
`
`BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
`
`1. Field of the Invention
`
`This invention pertains generally to hybrid powered
`vehicles employing both electric motors and auxiliary power
`units, and more particularly to controlling fuel consumption
`in a charge depletion hybrid electric vehicle.
`2. Description of the Background Art
`As discussed in my copending US. application Ser. No.
`08/963,067, a hybrid electric vehicle (HEV) is a vehicle with
`electricity as the primary energy source and an auxiliary
`power unit (APU) as the secondary source. The APU is
`typically an internal combustion engine (ICE) utilizing
`reformulated gasoline, methanol, ethanol, diesel, com-
`pressed natural gas or other hydrocarbon as a fuel source.
`The electrical energy is stored in chemical storage batteries
`or capacitors. A series hybrid electric vehicle uses the ICE
`to drive a generator which supplies power to the electric
`motor (EM) or charges the batteries, whereas a parallel
`hybrid uses the ICE and EM together to directly drive the
`wheels. In both configurations, the ICE is used to supple-
`ment the energy capacity and power capability of the battery
`pack.
`Most parallel hybrid vehicles are configured with a large
`ICE. The EM is selected for urban driving and acceleration,
`since the ICE may not be used provide the power required
`for this driving demand. In emergency situations, the ICE
`can provide “limp-home” capability when the batteries reach
`a depth of discharge (DOD) where the EM can no longer
`accelerate the vehicle.
`
`Various control strategies have been previously developed
`for operating the EM and ICE in hybrid vehicles. None of
`the existing control schemes, however, integrate the opera-
`tion of the EM and ICE in a hybrid vehicle in a way which
`maximizes both efficiency and range on the batteries while
`maintaining performance of the vehicle;
`that is, using a
`“charge depletion” control method in accordance with the
`present invention. Conventional control schemes operate on
`the principle of sustaining the charge on the batteries, rather
`than depleting the batteries as in the present invention. The
`present invention satisfies the need for a control method and
`apparatus that will provide for integration of the EM and
`ICE in an efficient manner without sacrificing vehicle per-
`formance.
`
`Furthermore, government regulating agencies such as the
`Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the California
`Air Resources Board (CARB), as well as users of a “charge
`depletion hybrid electric vehicle” (CDHEV) in accordance
`with the present invention, may want to change the relative
`amounts of liquid or hydrocarbon fuel and electric energy
`used by a fleet of CDHEVs, since the cost and technology
`of each commodity may change over time. For example,
`electric energy is currently less expensive for powering a
`vehicle per mile than gasoline. On the other hand, emissions
`from electrical powerplants may be less clean and less
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`40
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`60
`
`65
`
`2
`environmentally friendly than from gasoline engines. The
`present invention further satisfies the need to provide for
`changing the manner in which operation of the EM and ICE
`are controlled so as to allow for adjustment of the relative
`amounts of combustible fuels and electric energy consumed
`during operation of the vehicle fleet.
`The EPA currently specifies to vehicle manufacturers
`what is referred to as a “corporate average fuel economy”
`(CAFE) as well as individual vehicle emissions. A CDHEV
`in accordance with the present invention permits the EPA to
`also specify and regulate both emissions and fuel consump-
`tion for a fleet of hybrid electric vehicles. On the other hand,
`local regulations may be different since air quality and
`performance requirements change depending upon traffic
`and road infrastructure.
`
`BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
`
`invention generally comprises a “charge
`The present
`depletion” method and apparatus for operating the electric
`motor (EM) and internal combustion engine (ICE) in a
`hybrid electric vehicle (HEV) separately or together depend-
`ing upon the driving conditions. The invention further
`comprises a charge depletion control policy (CDCP) that can
`be modified to adjust the relative amounts of combustible
`and electric fuels used for operation of the vehicle.
`By way of example, and not of limitation, the invention
`provides for operating the hybrid powertrain in a zero
`emissions vehicle (ZEV) mode and in an HEV mode. In the
`ZEV mode, the EM provides all driving power while the ICE
`is uncoupled and turned off. In the HEV mode, operation of
`the EM and ICE is coordinated for maximum range and fuel
`efficiency.
`The ICE used in a vehicle employing the present inven-
`tion can be typically very small (e.g., approximately 0.016
`kW/vehicle kg) and typically would be sized to power the
`vehicle at its best efficiency for legal freeway cruise speeds.
`The engine can be used to cruise the vehicle at a level above
`the maximum speed limit for a range of approximately 690
`km or more. However, in typical city driving conditions,
`driving with the ICE alone produces less-than-desirable
`performance because of its small size. This is an important
`aspect of the invention since it encourages the driver to
`remember to periodically charge the vehicle batteries at
`home. Additionally, the varying driving conditions inherent
`in city driving will cycle the engine and reduce efficiency.
`Emissions would increase and fuel efficiency would
`decrease.
`
`In accordance with one CDCP of the present invention, as
`long as the battery depth of discharge (DOD) is less than a
`hybrid integration cross-over point of approximately 50%
`(i.e., the DOD is between 0% and approximately 50%), and
`the vehicle speed is less than approximately 113 kph, then
`the EM is operated alone; that is, the ICE is uncoupled and
`turned off. Here, the vehicle operates in a ZEV mode. At
`speeds greater than approximately 113 kph,
`the vehicle
`operates in an HEV mode where the ICE is used as the
`primary source of power and the EM is automatically
`activated to (i) assist the ICE during acceleration (e.g., for
`passing or climbing hills) or (ii) regenerate energy back into
`the battery during braking. Once the depth of discharge
`exceeds the hybrid integration cross-over point, the ICE is
`brought on line and turned on at varying vehicle speeds
`below approximately 113 kph. As the depth of discharge
`increases, the vehicle speed at which the ICE is brought on
`line decreases in order to increase overall range.
`In other words, as long as the battery depth of discharge
`is less than approximately 50% and the vehicle speed is less
`
`90f15
`
`FORD 1418
`
`9 of 15
`
`FORD 1418
`
`

`

`6,116,363
`
`3
`than approximately 113 kph, then the EM is operated alone;
`that is, the ICE is uncoupled and turned off. Therefore, the
`vehicle operates in a ZEV mode. At speeds greater than
`approximately 113 kph,
`the vehicle operates in an HEV
`mode where the ICE is used as the primary source of power
`and the EM is automatically activated to (i) assist the ICE
`during acceleration (e. g., for passing or climbing hills) or (ii)
`regenerate energy back into the battery during braking. Once
`the depth of discharge exceeds the cross-over point, the ICE
`is brought on line and turned on at varying vehicle speeds
`below approximately 113 kph.
`As a result, the invention combines the advantages of a
`ZEV vehicle in most city driving conditions as well as
`extended city range and high freeway efficiencies from the
`ICE. Typically,
`the vehicle can be driven in all driving
`conditions with full performance until the batteries reach a
`state of approximately 85% depth of discharge or more. The
`vehicle then degrades in acceleration performance can con-
`tinue to operate. The usable battery charge corresponds to a
`city driving range of approximately 160 km. Based on recent
`studies of vehicle usage, a range of approximately 115 km
`will satisfy over 80% of the typical road vehicle miles
`traveled by the public daily. Therefore, the vehicle power
`train will function as a ZEV for a majority of drivers in the
`city. Further, the vehicle will satisfy the needs of over 99%
`of the drivers when employing this CDCP. The vehicle will
`satisfy 100% of the drivers in reaching their destination;
`only 1% or less may reach their destination with degraded
`performance because they drove too far and the batteries are
`spent.
`the
`It will be appreciated that, by altering the CDCP,
`overall amount of combustible fuel burned by the vehicle in
`comparison to the amount of electric energy used can be
`increased or reduced to meet governmental or user mandated
`standards. If the DOD parameter in the CDCP is decreased,
`the amount of combustible fuel burned will
`increase,
`whereas increasing the DOD parameter in the CDCP will
`decrease the amount of combustible fuel burned and the
`
`vehicle will be powered by the EM more often thereby
`decreasing the high performance range.
`For example, assume that
`typical commuters travel
`approximately 40 miles and that a fleet of conventional
`vehicles driven by such computers uses approximately 2500
`gallons of gasoline per 1000 vehicles. The CDCP described
`above with a crossover point of approximately 50% DOD
`would reduce fleet consumption of gasoline to approxi-
`mately 70 gallons per 1000 vehicles for an approximate
`gasoline savings of 97%. By lowering the hybrid integration
`crossover point from 50% to 20%, only a 95% gasoline
`savings would be realized. If the hybrid integration cross-
`over point is further reduced, and the speed cross-over point
`is lowered from 113 km/hr to approximately 65 km/hr, the
`gasoline savings would be reduced to 85, and by further
`lowering the speed cross-over point to approximately 20
`km/br, only a 60% gasoline savings would be realized.
`Therefore,
`the threshold speeds and adjustment of the
`threshold speeds, as well as the charge depletion of the
`batteries (DOD characteristics), are a function of a control
`policy for the auxiliary power unit based on desired fleet fuel
`consumption and/or fleet vehicle emissions characteristics.
`In accordance with another aspect of the invention, con-
`trol of vehicle acceleration and speed is preferably accom-
`plished using a two-stage accelerator pedal when in hybrid
`mode where both the engine and the electric motor are
`powering the vehicle. Approximately the first 1/3 of pedal
`travel controls the throttle position of the ICE and the last 2/3
`
`5
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`40
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`60
`
`65
`
`4
`controls the torque of the EM. When operating in the HEV
`mode the ICE operates at high throttle settings and, when the
`ICE is operating at wide open throttle (WOT) but additional
`power is still required, the driver depresses the pedal further
`and the EM torque is automatically added. Therefore,
`vehicle acceleration is proportional to the accelerator pedal
`position as in a conventional car. Transmission shifting is
`accomplished similar to conventional cars.
`Since vehicle “launch” is performed by the EM, an
`automatic transmission would not need a torque converter.
`Further, a computer is not needed to coordinate the ICE
`throttle and EM torque control. Operation of the brake pedal
`is similar to the accelerator pedal, where the first part of the
`pedal depression provides regenerative braking by the EM,
`and the continued deflection eventually activates mechanical
`brakes which simply adds to the braking effort already
`available from regeneration.
`In accordance with another aspect of the invention, the
`batteries are not charged directly by the ICE during opera-
`tion of the vehicle, except during emergency conditions, in
`which case charging would only be partial and solely to
`maintain performance. For example, if the batteries were
`completely depleted (e.g., 100% DOD or 0% state of charge)
`and the ICE was running, the batteries could be slightly
`charged by the ICE (e.g., 5% state of charge) only to provide
`additional performance to get home or to a charging station.
`The manner of doing so would be for the driver to pull off
`to the side of the road, place the transmission in neutral, and
`depress both the accelerator pedal and the brake pedal at the
`same time so as to allow the ICE to operate at high rpm for
`several minutes. In such an event, the ICE and EM would
`both be on line, and the ICE would drive the EM in a
`regenerative mode so as to recharge the batteries. In normal
`operation, however, the batteries are charged only from an
`external power source. Thus, the hybrid control method of
`the present invention will be referred to herein as a “charge
`depletion” hybrid, in contrast to conventional “charge sus-
`taining” hybrids which charge the batteries directly from the
`ICE.
`In this context, note that
`long range batteries are
`required to make the vehicle practical. No controls are
`available to the driver of the vehicle other than an accelera-
`
`tor pedal, brake pedal and, if desired, a transmission clutch
`pedal. Operation in the ZEV and HEV modes are automatic,
`and the driver does not have control over those modes of
`
`operation.
`An object of the invention is to provide a control system
`for a hybrid electric vehicle powertrain which can provide
`super fuel and energy efficiency.
`Another object of the invention is to provide a control
`system for a hybrid electric vehicle powertrain which can
`provide for ultra low tailpipe emissions in a fleet.
`Another object of the invention is to provide a control
`system for a hybrid electric vehicle powertrain which can
`provide for high performance.
`Another object of the invention is to provide a control
`system for a hybrid electric vehicle powertrain which can
`provide for low cost manufacturing due to simplicity.
`Another object of the invention is to provide a control
`system for a hybrid electric vehicle powertrain which is
`simple to operate.
`Another object of the invention is to provide a control
`system for a hybrid electric vehicle powertrain which is
`automatic.
`
`Another object of the invention is to provide for flexibility
`in the control policy of a charge depletion hybrid electric
`vehicle.
`
`10 of15
`
`FORD 1418
`
`10 of 15
`
`FORD 1418
`
`

`

`6,116,363
`
`5
`Another object of the invention is to provide control over
`the relative amounts of combustible fuel and electric energy
`used in a charge depletion hybrid electric vehicle.
`Further objects and advantages of the invention will be
`brought out in the following portions of the specification,
`wherein the detailed description is for the purpose of fully
`disclosing preferred embodiments of the invention without
`placing limitations thereon.
`
`BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
`
`The invention will be more fully understood by reference
`to the following drawings which are for illustrative purposes
`only:
`FIG. 1 schematically depicts a hybrid vehicle powertrain
`in accordance with the present invention showing the pre-
`ferred embodiment with a clutch for
`a “parallel”
`configuration, and showing a generator which can replace
`the clutch and shaft for a “series” configuration.
`FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram of an embodiment of a
`parallel hybrid vehicle powertrain in accordance with the
`present invention.
`FIG. 3 is a flow chart showing an embodiment of the
`method of the present invention.
`FIG. 4 graphically depicts a control policy for the opera-
`tion of a hybrid vehicle electric motor and internal combus-
`tion engine as function of vehicle speed and battery depth of
`discharge in accordance with the present invention.
`FIG. 5 is a graph depicting the distribution density of
`travelers using vehicles in a geographical area.
`FIG. 6 is a graph depicting the total fuel used by a 1000
`vehicle fleet travelling according to the distribution density
`shown in FIG. 5.
`
`FIG. 7 is a graph depicting an alternative to the control
`policy shown in FIG. 4.
`FIG. 8 is a graph depicting a second alternative to the
`control policy shown in FIG. 4.
`FIG. 9 is a graph depicting a third alternative to the
`control policy shown in FIG. 4 showing a strategy which
`minimizes use of electric energy to extend the range of the
`vehicle in city and highway driving to a maximum.
`FIG. 10 is a block diagram of a charge depletion control
`system in accordance with the present invention for con-
`trolling the ICE, EM, clutch and transmission from an
`accelerator pedal and a brake pedal.
`FIG. 11 is a diagram showing operation of a typical
`two-stage accelerator pedal in accordance with the present
`invention.
`
`FIG. 12 is a diagram showing operation of a typical
`two-stage brake pedal in accordance with the present inven-
`tion.
`
`DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE
`INVENTION
`
`Referring more specifically to the drawings, where like
`reference numerals denote like parts, for illustrative pur-
`poses the present invention is embodied in the apparatus and
`method generally depicted therein. It will be appreciated that
`the apparatus may vary as to configuration and as to details
`of the parts, and that the method of the invention may vary
`as to the steps and their sequence, without departing from
`the basic concepts as disclosed herein.
`In accordance with the present invention, a hybrid electric
`vehicle can enjoy the advantages of electric vehicles (e.g.,
`zero emissions, no idling, efficient energy usage) and con-
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`40
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`60
`
`65
`
`6
`
`ventional gasoline vehicles (long range, widely available
`fuel). Referring first to FIG. 1 and FIG. 2, a hybrid power-
`train configuration 10 in accordance with the present inven-
`tion utilizes a large electric motor (EM) 12 and an auxiliary
`power unit (APU) 14 which is preferably a small internal
`combustion engine (ICE) integrated in a drive package.
`Alternatively, APU 14 may be an external combustion
`engine, such as a Sterling or steam engine, or a fuel cell
`which would be electrically connected to the batteries and
`throttle control. The EM 12, which typically has a power
`output of approximately four times that of ICE 14, may be
`any high power electric motor operating from batteries, such
`as a Unique Mobility SR180N brushless, permanent-magnet
`DC motor or the like with regenerative braking. The ICE 14
`may be any small gasoline engine such as a Briggs &
`Stratton Vanguard or the like. The EM 12 is typically
`coupled to a shaft 16 which transmits power to a multi-speed
`or continuously variable transmission 18 which in turn
`drives a shaft 20 which transmits power to the wheels 22.
`The transmission 18 may be manual or automatic and, if
`automatic, would not require a torque converter. Continu-
`ously variable transmissions may be employed as well. A
`conventional cable actuated shifting system (not shown)
`retrofitted to the transmission 18 produces a standard shift
`pattern if the transmission is manually controlled.
`Note that powertrain 10 shown in FIG. 2 is depicted in a
`generic form in FIG. 1, applicable to both series and parallel
`hybrids. In a parallel hybrid configuration, ICE 14 would be
`coupled to EM 12 via an electromagnetic clutch 24 or the
`like. In a series hybrid configuration, ICE 14 would not be
`coupled to EM 12 but, instead, would drive a generator 26
`which would in turn provide electric power to drive EM 12
`but would not charge batteries 28 when using a charge
`depletion control scheme. In either configuration, a control-
`ler 30 is used to control the speed and torque of the EM 12.
`In the parallel hybrid configuration, the electromagnetic
`clutch 24 is typically a Warner SF825 or the like coupled to
`intermediate shafts 32a, 32b, and is used to engage and
`disengage the ICE 14 from the drivetrain.
`If specially
`designed, EM 12 could run at the same speed as the ICE 14
`and thus could be in line with the transmission 18 and the
`
`ICE 14 as shown in FIG. 1. Alternatively, a belt 34, such as
`a 36-mm Kevlar Gates Poly Chain GT belt or the like can be
`used to connect the EM 12 to the intermediate shaft 32b in
`
`a configuration as shown in FIG. 2. By using a reduction
`ratio of 1.56:1 or the like, the rpm range of the EM 12 is
`matched to that of the ICE 14. Either way, the EM 12 is
`always coupled to the drivetrain. This allows the regenera-
`tive braking capability of the EM 12 to be available on all
`modes, so as to load the drivetrain and produce electricity
`when desired. The regenerative braking capability of EM 12
`is activated when the brake pedal is slightly depressed.
`As indicated above, the EM 12 can be a Unique Mobility
`SR180N electric motor or the like, which is a permanent-
`magnet, brushless direct current electric motor. An AC
`induction motor or similar traction motor may also be used.
`The charge-depletion parallel hybrid design requires that
`the ICE 14 be sized to maintain the vehicle load require-
`ments at level road legal highway cruising speeds (95—120
`km/hr in the US. or other legal speeds in various countries)
`as well as to provide the best fuel economy at these cruising
`speeds. Additionally, the ICE 14 must have low specific fuel
`consumption (high efficiency) and emissions for all power
`levels. These requirements mandate careful selection of the
`ICE 14. An internal combustion engine can be made to
`operate most efficiently at wide open throttle; therefore, the
`power output of the ICE 14 must match the power required
`to maintain the vehicle at a desired highway cruising speed.
`
`11of15
`
`FORD 1418
`
`11 of 15
`
`FORD 1418
`
`

`

`6,116,363
`
`7
`The ICE 14 was sized to power the vehicle for freeway
`cruise at 113 kph for in a specific example constructed. In
`typical city driving conditions, however, driving with the
`ICE 14 alone produces low performance. Additionally, the
`varying driving conditions inherent in city driving will cycle
`the engine and reduce efficiency. Emissions would increase
`and fuel efficiency would decrease.
`In order to improve performance in these conditions, the
`charge depletion control method of the present invention
`was developed by monitoring vehicle speed and depth of
`discharge (DOD) of the battery, and controlling the EM 12
`and ICE 14 as a function thereof. The invention provides for
`operating the hybrid powertrain in a zero emissions vehicle
`(ZEV) mode and in a hybrid electric vehicle (HEV) mode.
`In the ZEV mode, the electric motor provides all driving
`power while the internal combustion engine is uncoupled
`and turned off. Typically, the vehicle can be driven in all
`driving conditions until the batteries reach a state of approxi-
`mately 90% DOD. The usable battery charge corresponds to
`a ZEV range of approximately 120—160 km.
`Referring to FIG. 3, a general flow diagram of the control
`method is shown. At step 100, the EM 12 is turned on to
`“launch” or start the vehicle and the vehicle operates in a
`ZEV mode. At steps 110 and 120, the vehicle speed and
`battery depth of discharged are sensed, respectively. At step
`130 a determination is made as to whether there is less than
`
`a low predetermined value, such as approximately 10%,
`charge left. If the depth of discharge is greater than the
`predetermine value, such as 90%, then an emergency warn-
`ing light is activated at step 140 so that the driver can take
`appropriate emergency measures to recharge the batteries or
`continue to operate the vehicle at degraded performance. For
`example, the driver can stop the vehicle, put the transmis-
`sion in neutral, push the accelerator and brake pedals
`simultaneously, and run the ICE 14 at high rpm for several
`minutes. This will partially charge the batteries and allow the
`vehicle to “limp” home for a complete recharging. Of
`course, the driver can simply continue home with lower
`acceleration capability if desired.
`At step 150 the vehicle speed and battery depth of
`discharge are compared with a control curve and, if those
`parameters exceed a predetermined threshold, the ICE 14 is
`brought on line by engaging the clutch at step 170 and
`turning the engine on at step. 180. Otherwise, the ICE 14
`remains off line and the vehicle continues to operate in a
`ZEV mode at step 160. Once the ICE 14 is operating, the EM
`12 is available for supplemental use. If ICE 14 is operating
`at wide open throttle and a call for acceleration or other
`additional power demand is sensed at step 190, then at step
`200 EM 12 is used to supply additional power such as for
`boost and control of the vehicle; for example, when the
`vehicle is accelerating or climbing a hill. If ICE 14 is
`operating at low power and the brake pedal is depressed for
`deceleration at step 210, then at step 220 the EM 12 is
`operated in a regeneration mode and the ICE clutch is
`opened. In this mode, the EM 12 loads the vehicle power-
`train to assist in slowing the vehicle, and generates electric-
`ity which will provide a charge to the batteries. If desired,
`during deceleration or braking the ICE 14 could be taken off
`line and turned off by decoupling the clutch and cutting of
`the flow of fuel. As can be seen,
`the process otherwise
`returns to step 110 from step 210.
`Referring also to FIG. 4, a preferred control policy used
`for coordinating the operation of the EM 12 and the ICE 14
`in step 150 of FIG. 3 are graphically shown. The area below
`the “on” threshold curve 250 is where the vehicle operates
`in a ZEV mode, with the EM 12 turned on and the ICE 14
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`40
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`60
`
`65
`
`8
`decoupled and turned off. The area above the “on” threshold
`curve 250 is where the vehicle operates in a HEV mode with
`the ICE 14 coupled and turned on, and with the EM 12 being
`used only for accelerating, climbing hills and regenerative
`braking.
`In accordance with the control policy shown in FIG. 4, as
`long as the battery DOD is less than the hybrid integration
`cross-over point 260 of approximately 50% and the vehicle
`speed is less than the maximum speed threshold 270 of
`approximately 113 kph to 120 kph,
`then the EM 12 is
`operated alone. This is the range of speeds typically encoun-
`tered in city driving.
`Therefore,
`the vehicle operates as a ZEV. When the
`vehicle is operating at speeds in excess of approximately 113
`kph to 120 kph, which corresponds to freeway driving, the
`ICE 14 is turned on and the EM 12 is used only for
`accelerating, climbing hills, and regenerative braking.
`However, once the DOD exceeds approximately 50%, the
`ICE 14 is brought online at varying speeds as a function of
`DOD; that is, as the DOD increases, the speed at which the
`ICE 14 is brought online decreases in order to increase
`overall range. Therefore, the ICE 14 is not turned on unless
`the vehicle speed exceeds approximately 113 kph or unless
`the batteries are approximately 50% depleted. Then it is
`brought on according to the batteries’ DOD. After the ICE
`14 is turned on and vehicle is operating in a HEV mode, if
`the vehicle speed/depth of discharge parameters fall below
`the “off” threshold curve 280, the ICE 14 is decoupled and
`turned off. Then, since the EM 12 is still online, the vehicle
`again operates in a ZEV mode. The control band between the
`“on” threshold curve 250 and the “off” threshold curve 280
`
`prevents undesirable or excessive cycling of the ICE 14 due
`to fluctuations in sensed speed and depth of discharge. As an
`alternative to separate “on” and “off” thresholds, a single
`threshold could be used in combination with a time delay
`between the “on” and “off” modes to prevent frequent
`cycling. Both techniques may also be used.
`In a typical vehicle employing the present invention, the
`50% depletion point of the batteries should occur at approxi-
`mately 115 km of city driving. If a driver is on a freeway and
`exceeds 113 k

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket