`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`FORD MOTOR COMPANY,
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`PAICE LLC and THE ABELL FOUNDATION, INC.,
`Patent Owners
`
`Case IPR2015-00792
`Patent 8,214,097
`
`DECLARATION OF DANIEL A. TISHMAN IN SUPPORT OF PATENT
`OWNERS’ MOTION FOR PRO HAC VICE ADMISSION
`
`PAICE 2205
`Ford v. Paice & Abell
`IPR2015-00792
`
`
`
`Proceeding No. IPR2015-00792
`Attorney Docket No: 36351-0013IP3
`
`DECLARATION OF DANIEL A. TISHMAN IN
`SUPPORT OF PETITIONER’S MOTION FOR PRO HAC
`VICE ADMISSION
`
`I, Daniel A. Tishman, hereby declare the following:
`
`I am a member in good standing of the Bar of the District of Columbia.
`
`I have not been suspended or disbarred from practice before any court or
`
`
`
`1.
`
`2.
`
`administrative body.
`
`3.
`
`I have never had an application for admission to practice before any court or
`
`administrative body denied.
`
`4.
`
`No sanction or contempt citation has been imposed against me by any court
`
`or administrative body.
`
`5.
`
`I have read and will comply with the Office Patent Trial Practice Guide and
`
`the Board’s Rules of Practice for Trials set forth in part 42 of the Code of Federal
`
`Regulations.
`
`6.
`
`I will be subject to the USPTO Rules of Professional Conduct set forth in 37
`
`C.F.R. §§ 11.101 et seq. and disciplinary jurisdiction under 37 C.F.R. § 11.19(a).
`
`7.
`
`I am concurrently applying to appear pro hac vice before the Office in
`
`IPR2015-00606, IPR2015-00722, IPR2015-00758, IPR2015-00784, IPR2015-
`
`00785, IPR2015-00787, IPR2015-00790, IPR2015-00791, IPR2015-00799,
`
`IPR2015-00800, and IPR2015-00801. I am backup counsel in two Paice cases,
`
`and both involve U.S. Patent 8,214,097 as well as other patents in the same family.
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`Proceeding No. IPR2015-00792
`Attorney Docket No: 36351-0013IP3
`
`8.
`
`I am a litigation attorney whose practice focuses on patent litigation in
`
`Federal District Courts and Section 337 proceedings before the International Trade
`
`Commission. I have been involved in cases covering a broad range of
`
`technologies, including complex computer software, television tuners, micro-
`
`electromechanical systems, consumer mobile handsets, and hybrid-electric
`
`vehicles. Through my practice in such cases, I have gained substantial experience
`
`in all aspects of patent litigation, including discovery procedures, motions practice,
`
`depositions, Markman hearings, and trials. I began his legal career as a judicial
`
`clerk for the Honorable Judge Yvette P. Kane of the United States District Court
`
`for the Middle District of Pennsylvania from 2011-2013. I received my J.D.,
`
`summa cum laude, from Tulane Law School in 2011, where I was a managing
`
`editor of the Tulane Law Review. I received a B.S. in Information Sciences and
`
`Technology from the Pennsylvania State University in 2007. My biography is
`
`attached hereto as Appendix A. I represent Paice & Abell in two related matters:
`
`Paice LLC, et. al. v. Hyundai Motor Co., et. al., No. CIV. WDQ-12-0499 (D. Md.)
`
`and Paice LLC, et. al. v. Ford Motor Company, No. CIV. WDQ-14-cv-00492 (D.
`
`Md.). Both cases are currently pending in the U.S. District Court for the District of
`
`Maryland, and both involve U.S. Patent 8,214,097, as well as other patents in the
`
`same family.
`
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`Proceeding No. IPR2015-00792
`Attorney Docket No: 36351-0013IP3
`
`9.
`
`I hereby declare that all statements made herein of my own knowledge are
`
`true and that all statements made on information and belief are believed to be true;
`
`and further that these statements were made with the knowledge that willful false
`
`statements and the like so made are punishable by fine or imprisonment, or both,
`
`under Section 1001 of Title 18 of the United States Code and that such willful false
`
`statements may jeopardize the validity of the application or any patents issued
`
`thereon.
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
` /Daniel A. Tishman /
`Daniel A. Tishman
`Fish & Richardson P.C.
`3200 RBC Plaza
`60 South Sixth Street
`Minneapolis, MN 55402
`Tel: 202-783-5070
`Email: tishman@fr.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Date: December 30, 2015
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`
`
`Tishman-Daniel-2015-FishBio
`
`Page 1 of 2
`
`Appendix A
`
`Daniel A. Tishman
`Associate
`
` Washington, DC 202-626-7725
`
`
`
` tishman@fr.com
`
`Background
`
`Daniel Tishman is an Associate in Fish & Richardson’s Washington, DC, office. His practice focuses on patent litigation in federal
`district courts and before the International Trade Commission. From 2011-2013, Dan served as a judicial clerk for the Honorable Yvette
`Kane of the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania.
`
`Services
`• Litigation
`
`• Patent Litigation
`
`Education
`J.D., Tulane University Law School 2011
`
`Managing Editor, Tulane Law Review
`
`summa cum laude, Order of the Coif
`
`B.S., Pennsylvania State University 2007
`Information Science and Technology
`
`French and Francophone Studies minor, with distinction
`
`cum laude
`
`Admissions
`• District of Columbia 2014
`
`Clerkships
`United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania, The Honorable Yvette Kane, 2011 - 2013
`
`Experience
`Litigation Examples
`
`http://www.fr.com/daniel-tishman/
`
`12/30/2015
`
`5
`
`
`
`Tishman-Daniel-2015-FishBio
`
`Page 2 of 2
`
`District Court
`
`IMS Health Inc. v. Symphony Health Solutions, Corp. et. al. (D. Del.)(J. Sleet)-
`Representing IMS Health in multi-patent infringement case involving healthcare
`analytics and informatics. Case pending.
`
`Ericsson v. Samsung Electronics (E.D. Tx.)- Represented defendant Samsung
`Electronics in multi-patent infringement case involving a wide array of consumer
`electronics technologies. Case settled.
`
`Section 337 Investigations- International Trade Commission
`
`Certain Television Sets, Televisions Receivers, Television Tuners, and Components
`Thereof, Inv. No. 337-TA-910- Representing respondent LG in ITC investigation against
`complainant CrestaTech in multi-patent infringement case involving television tuner
`technology. Case pending.
`
`Certain Microelectromechanical Systems ("MEMS Devices") and Products Containing the
`Same, Inv. No. 337-TA-876- Represented respondent InvenSense against complainant
`STMicroelectronics in multi-patent infringement case involving MEMS technology.
`Case settled.
`
`© 2015 - Fish & Richardson
`
`http://www.fr.com/daniel-tishman/
`
`12/30/2015
`
`6