`PAPER SERIES
`
`950493
`
`
`
`The Effects of APU Characteristics on the
`
`Design of Hybrid Control Strategies
`for Hybrid Electric Vehicles
`
`Catherine Anderson and Erin Pettit
`AeroVironment
`
`Reprinted from: Design Innovations in
`Electric and Hybrid Electric Vehicles
`(SP-1 089)
`
`Q
`
`The Engineering Society
`
`#2ForAdvancing Mobility
`
`,
`
`.
`
`.
`
`International Congress and Exposmon
`
`Detroit, Michigan
`Land Sea Air and Spacew
`Februarv27-March2.1995
`INTERNATIONAL
`
`
`400 Commonwealth Drive, Warrendale, PA 1 5096-0001 U.S.A. Tel: (412)776-4841 Fax:(41 2)776-5760
`
`Page 1 of 9
`
`FORD 1219
`
`Page 1 of 9
`
`FORD 1219
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`The appearance of the ISSN code at the bottom of this page indicates SAE's consent
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`that copies of the paper may be made for personal or internal use of specific clients.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`This consent is given on the condition, however, that the copier pay a $5.00 per article
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`copy fee through the Copyright Clearance Center,
`lnc. Operations Center, 222
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01 923tor copying beyond that permitted by Sections
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`107 or 108 of the US. Copyright Law. This consent does not extend to other kinds
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`of copying such as copying for general distribution, for advertising or promotional
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`purposes, for creating new collective works, or for resale.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`SAE routinely stocks printed papers for a period of three years following date of
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`publication. Direct your orders to SAE Customer Sales and Satisfaction
`
`Department.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Quantity reprint rates can be obtained from the Customer Sales and Satisfaction
`
`Department.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`To request permission to reprint a technical paper or permission to use copyrighted
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`SAE publications in other works, contact the SAE Publications Group.
`
`
`
`
`
`GLOBAL MOBILITY DATABASE
`
`All SAE papers, standards, and selected
`
`
`
`
`
`
`books are abstracted and indexed in the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Global Mobility Database.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`No part of this publication may by reproduced in any form, in an electronic retrieval
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`system or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the publisher.
`
`
`
`ISSN 0148-7191
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Copyright 1995 Society of Automotive Engineers, Inc.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Positions and opinions advanced in this paper are those of the author(s) and not
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`necessarily those of SAE. The author is solely responsible for the content of the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`paper. A process is available by which discussions will be printed with the paper if
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`it is published in SAE transactions. For permission to publish this paper in full or in
`
`
`
`
`
`
`part, contact the SAE Publications Group.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Persons wishing to submit papers to be considered for presentation or publication
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`through SAE should send the manuscript or a 300 word abstract of a proposed
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`manuscript to: Secretary, Engineering Activity Board, SAE.
`
`
`
`
`Printed in USA
`
`
`
`
`
`90-12030/PG
`
`
`
`
`—|
`Page 2 of 9
`
`—l
`FORD 1219
`
`Page 2 of 9
`
`FORD 1219
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`The Effects of APU Characteristics on the Design of
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Hybrid Control Strategies for Hybrid Electric Vehicles
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Catherine Anderson and Erin Pettit
`AeroVironment
`
`950493
`
`ABSTRACT
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`A hybrid control strategy is an algorithm that determines
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`when and at what power level to run a hybrid electric vehicle's
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`auxiliary power unit (APU) as a function of the power demand
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`at the wheels, the state of charge of the battery, and the current
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`power level of the APU. The design of this strategy influences
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`the efficiency of the overall system. The strategy must
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`balance the flow of power between the APU, the battery, and
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`the motor, with the intent of maximizing the average fuel
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`economy without overstressing the battery and curtailing its
`life.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`The development of a system’s powertrain components
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`and the design of an optimum control strategy for that system
`should be concurrent to allow tradeoffs to be made while the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`designs are still fluid. An efficient optimization process must
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`involve all aspects of the system, including costs, from the
`
`beginning.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`In this paper, we explore the methodology behind the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`design of a hybrid control strategy. We also discuss the APU
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`and battery design characteristics that are crucial to the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`strategy design, focusing on the interdependence of these
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`design characteristics within the entire system. Finally, we
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`propose a process for the development of an optimized hybrid
`
`
`
`
`
`
`powertrain and the corresponding control algorithm.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`INTRODUCTION
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`A "hybrid" vehicle usually refers to one that incorporates
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`a minimum of two independent power sources to supply the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`drivetrain. One of the primary advantages of this dual power
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`supply system is it allows flexibility in power distribution
`
`
`
`
`
`
`between sources. This versatility enables greater optimization
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`of the vehicle powertrain to meet the required performance of
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`the system.
`In order to profit from such system flexibility, one
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`must integrate into the system an intelligent control strategy
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`that uses each component to the overall system's best
`
`advantage.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`A hybrid control strategy is an algorithm that determines
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`how power in a hybrid powertrain should be distributed as a
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`function of the vehicle parameters (power demand, battery
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`state of char e SOC), component temperatures, etc.) and of
`I
`Page 3 of 9
`
`
`
`
`
`65
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`component characteristics. One must develop this strategy
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`carefully as part of the vehicle design process from the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`beginning. While the strategy determines the best operating
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`points for the components, the range of available component
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`characteristics provides the limits within which the strategy
`
`
`must operate.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`This paper explores the iterative process of concurrent
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`powertrain component and control strategy design with an
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`emphasis on optimizing the system as a whole. We focus
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`primarily on the auxiliary power unit and the characteristics of
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`the powertrain components that drive the strategy design.
`
`
`
`HYBRID VEHICLE CONCEPT
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Hybrid vehicles can be divided into two main categories:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`parallel, in which both systems are used to mechanically drive
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`the wheels; and series, where the power supply systems are
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`coupled directly to a power bus which then transfers power to
`the wheels.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`SERIES SYSTEM - The philosophy behind a series
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`hybrid vehicle lies in its combination of a primary and a
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`secondary energy conversion. In the primary conversion, an
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`APU converts a highly transportable, stable Chemical fuel to
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`mechanical energy (or directly to electrical energy in certain
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`cases) and, subsequently, to electrical energy. The most
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`frequently considered APUs for hybrid systems include
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`various internal and external combustion engines and fuel
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`cells. This primary conversion device can be decoupled from
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`the wheel power demand (unlike the engine in a conventional
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`car) as a Load Leveling Device (LLD), which acts as an
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`energy buffer, is included in the system. This LLD alternately
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`stores energy (either directly from the primary conversion at
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`low wheel power requirements or from the kinetic energy of
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`the decelerating vehicle) and provides the propulsion motor
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`with energy when the demand exceeds the APU power output.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Some LLDs that have been proposed for use in hybrid vehicles
`
`
`
`
`
`
`include batteries, supercapacitors, hydraulic and/or pneumatic
`
`
`
`
`storage devices, and flywheels.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`The secondary conversion, occurring in the inverter and
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`motor, transforms the electrical energy from either source into
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`the mechanical energy that drives the vehicle. Figure l is a
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`schematic of the energy flow within the vehicle.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`FORD 1219
`
`8
`8
`
`Page 3 of 9
`
`FORD 1219
`
`
`
`Since all the power sources and sinks are directly coupled
`by a DC power bus. control of the entire system can be
`achieved by simply commanding the APU output. The
`accessory and wheel loads pull required power off the bus
`with the LLD supplying the balance of power in the system.
`
`Alternator
`
`
`
`Figure 1: Series hybrid vehicle component configuration.
`
`ICE Vehicle
`
`
`
`IncreasingAPUPower
`
`Power Assist
`
`
`
`
`
`Range Extender
`
`Pure Electric
`Vehicle
`
`Increasing Battery Storage ——-)
`
`Figure 2: Comparison Chart of Power Assist and Range
`Extender Series Hybrid Vehicles
`
`In addition, the series hybrid design may fall into one of
`two categories: "power assist" or "range extender" (see figure
`2). A power assist hybrid uses the LLD to manage the power
`output from the APU to maximize efficiency and emissions in
`the APU. The usable storage capacity of the LLD is quite
`small (on the order of 1-5 kWh), and the APU must be capable
`of providing the maximum sustained power the vehicle is
`expected to need, with the LLD providing peak powers and
`transients. A range extender hybrid uses a very small APU
`with a substantial LLD such that the vehicle will perform
`similarly to a pure electric vehicle. with the additional small
`“m“ M..-“ "imply extending the range. Since the APU for
`
`a range extender is small compared with the power demand. it
`is most often run at its maximum power level, and hybrid
`control strategies are fairly simple.
`The primary disadvantage of the series hybrid system in
`most cases is the extra inefficiencies included in converting
`the mechanical power output from the APU into electrical
`power and then back into mechanical power. Often. however,
`the increased flexibility of the system offers more optimized
`components that overcome this disadvantage.
`
`PARALLEL SYSTEM- In a parallel hybrid vehicle,
`there is a direct mechanical connection between the APU and
`
`the wheels through a transmission. As shown in figure 3, the
`electric propulsion system may either drive the same set of
`wheels as the APU through the transmission (Option 1), or
`drive the other set of wheels directly (Option 2).
`
`
`
`
`v
`v
`
` o
`o
`3
`o4
`v
`..
`.‘i’
`o.3
`
`
`oboeo.
`
`‘roowww
`
`V’?’€
`£6466
`90.
`qvvea
`v. 90
`boos3;3.
`
`,+99
`SS5s
`3s
`’o[1113I
`
`.5oo
`0
` vy-‘e
`
`
`‘9'9’0'0’o‘o‘t‘e-“a...Ii
`
`
`
`3.5%;weee&%%Ns...
`
`000
`..‘
`
`
`Figure 3: Parallel hybrid vehicle component
`configuration.
`
`The main advantages of the parallel configuration over the
`series is that the power from the engine is used directly by the
`drivetrain with no alternator or inverter losses. However,
`because the APU is directly coupled to the wheels. the APU
`speed is determined by the vehicle speed and the transmission
`ratio. This direct coupling limits the flexibility of hybrid
`strategy design, and (without a novel clutched transmission)
`forces the APU to idle when the vehicle is at rest.
`
`A parallel hybrid does have an efficiency advantage when
`the vehicle spends a majority of its driving time at a
`substantial cruise, but a vehicle that is operated on a "city
`driving" profile will lose this transmission efficiency
`advantage to inefficiencies in the APU engine.
`In addition, if
`the front and rear axles of the vehicle are driven by different
`power sources, the vehicle may exhibit changes in handling
`characteristics as the power distribution between the sources is
`adjusted.
`
`The thought processes presented in this paper are
`sufficiently general that they can be applied to any type of
`vehicle. To fully explore the flexibility allowed by the hybrid
`system, we focus on the design of a strata
`”
`"
`
`Page 4 of 9
`
`FORD 1219
`
`Page 4 of 9
`
`FORD 1219
`
`
`
`versatile layout; the power assist hybrid. For simplicity, we
`use the example of a generalized IC engine and Pb-Acid
`battery for the APU and battery, respectively, as a focus for
`the discussion.
`
`HYBRID CONTROL STRATEGIES
`
`There are two distinct extremes in the spectrum of control
`strategies. One is a system that uses a "thermostat" algorithm
`to command the APU (i.e. the APU is turned on to a constant
`power level when the SOC of the LLD is below a certain
`lower threshold, and off when the SOC exceeds an upper
`threshold). In this mode. the LLD must accommodate all the
`transient power requirements. Although the APU may be
`operating at its most efficient point. the losses in the LLD
`from excessive cycling may surpass the savings from an
`optimized APU. For the example wheel power curve shown in
`figure 4, figure 5 shows the corresponding APU and LLD
`power requirements generated by a thermostat mode.
`
`Federal Urban Cycle
`
`Wheel Power
`
`60
`A 40
`E 20
`I.
`0 '
`g-zoO
`
`n- as
`
`1500 1700 1900 2100 2300 2500 2700 2900 3100 3300 3500
`Time(s)
`
`Figure 4: The p0wer required at the wheels for a segment
`of the federal urban drive (LA4).
`
`The other extreme commands the APU to follow the
`
`actual wheel power whenever possible (similar to a
`conventional automobile). Using this strategy, the LLD
`cycling will diminish. and the losses associated with charge
`and discharge will be minimized. The APU, however, must
`then operate over its entire range of power levels and perform
`fast power transients. both of which can adversely affect
`engine efficiency and emissions characteristics. Figure 6
`shows the APU and LLD power requirements generated by
`this "following" mode for the same wheel power curve shown
`in figure 4. It should be noted that this is the mode a parallel
`hybrid vehicle always uses.
`For most of the APUs and LLDs under consideration,
`
`neither of these strategies would be the optimum strategy. The
`ideal hybrid conu'ol strategy is one that minimizes the
`combined inefficiencies of both the APU and the LLD while
`
`meeting the desired performance and the emission limits (as
`well as any other specific system characteristics that are being
`used as measures of design merit). The optimum strategy is
`highly dependent on the characteristics of the powertrain
`components and the planned use of the vehicle. Unfortunately
`as one attempts to optimize a system, the characteristics of the
`components begin to conflict, driving the strategy in different
`directions.
`
`Page 5 of 9
`
`Constant APU Mode
`
`APU Power
`
`
`
`1500 1700 [9(1) 2100 2300 2500 2700 2900 3100 3300 3500
`
`[JD Power
`
`0888
`Power(kW) 8
`
`
`
`8‘5
`
`1500 1700 1900 2100 2300 2500 2700 2900 3100 3300 3500
`Tune(s)
`
`Figure 5: The APU and LLD power outputs that satisfy
`the wheel requirements using a constant APU thermostat
`strategy.
`
`APU follower Mode
`
`APU Power
`
`
`
`o888
`
`(kW) r'oo as
`Power
`
`1500 1700 1900 2100 2300 2500 2700 2900 3100 3300 3500
`Time(s)
`
`Figure 6: The distribution of power for a load following
`APU.
`
`COMPONENT CHARACTERISTICS AND DESIGN
`TRADE-OFFS
`
`LLDs - The LLD (in this case a battery) must be the most
`accommodative element in the powertrain. When there is a
`large power demand or production from the wheels (as during
`hard acceleration or braking), it must supply or accept the
`power required. In a hybrid application, the battery pack
`generally hm lower capacity than it would have for a pure
`electric vehicles (particularly for a power assist hybrid where
`
`67
`
`FORD 1219
`
`8
`
`Page 5 of 9
`
`FORD 1219
`
`
`
`—|
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`battery life are available, some qualitative statements can be
`made:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1. A lead acid battery will degrade more (per a
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`throughput kWh) if cycled deeply (cycled through a
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`wide range of SOCs) than shallowly. The long term
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`effects of microcycling (cycling over a small range of
`
`
`
`
`
`SOCs) are not fully known.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2. A battery will last longer if it has lower energy
`
`throughput.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`3. Hard cycling (high power cycling), even hard
`
`
`
`
`
`microcycling, will shorten the life.
`
`
`
`
`
`Charge
`
`
`
`Discharge
`
`(Ohms)
`
`InternalResistance
`
`lllllll
`
`ll1l
`
`
`
`0
`
`
`
`0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`State of Charge (%)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Figure 7: The charge and discharge internal resistances
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`versus the state of charge of a battery.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Figure 8 shows the difference between the SOCs of the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`thermostat and follower extremes discussed above (see figures
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`3-5) over multiple repetitions of the federal urban driving
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`cycle. In the thermostat mode,
`the APU power output is
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`greater than the average power for the cycle causing the state
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`of charge to continue to increase until it reaches a defined
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`maximum state of charge (in this case 80%) requiring the APU
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`to turn off. The follower mode, on the other hand, provides
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`only a slight constant increase in SOC due to the battery's
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`absorption of regenerative energy during the cycle.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`The deep cycled battery might only last half as long as the one
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`kept within a tight SOC window. However, the costs of
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`replacing the battery versus the cost of building an APU
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`capable of fast transient response(that can protect the battery)
`
`
`
`must be weighed.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`APUs - Because the APU is decoupled from the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`drivetrain, there is greater flexibility in its design. The design
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`need not be performance driven as in conventional IC engines,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`but can be focused on other characteristics, such as emissions,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`that may be more important for the specific vehicle being
`
`
`
`
`
`
`designed. Most importantly, however, the APU characteristics
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`must be chosen to complement the LLD requirements; thus,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`the need for a working strategy throughout the design process.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Characteristics crucial to the design include maximum power
`
`
`
`
`
`
`output, transient capabilities, fuel efficiency, emissions
`
`
`
`
`
`
`characteristics, engine noise vibration harshness (NVH), and
`
`
`service life.
`—‘
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`FORD 1219
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`the APU is of considerable size). To maintain the same
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`performance, therefore, the power density must be greater. In
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`addition, the state of charge of the battery can be significantly
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`affected during a short acceleration or deceleration so that the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`small-scale charge/discharge period (or "microcycling”) that
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`the pack sees is a more significant percentage of its capacity.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Differing control strategies can place varying demands on the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`cycling of the battery. Using the thermostat APU strategy, the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`battery would be required to cycle at the frequency of the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`wheel power demand, while the follower APU strategy would
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`only require the battery to cycle when the wheel power
`
`
`
`
`
`
`demand exceeds the APU power capability.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`There are several characteristics of the battery that one
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`must keep in mind when trying to quantify tradeoffs between
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`the battery and the rest of the system:
`the charge/discharge
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`efficiency, the total capacity of the pack, the transient
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`capabilities, and, the hardest to determine, the life of the
`batteries.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`ChargeZDischarge Efficiencies - A battery is most
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`efficient within a range of SOCs that minimizes its charge and
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`discharge resistances. In figure 7, one can see the general
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`shape of a Pb-Acid battery's internal resistance versus state of
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`charge curves for charging and discharging the battery. A
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`balance point must be chosen on these curves to minimize
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`resistive losses, yet still leave room for power peaks (both
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`motoring and regenerative braking) at the wheels. This tends
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`to push the strategy design to keep the SOC within the 50-70%
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`region for minimum losses in both charge and discharge. This
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`leaves enough capacity to handle an extended period of battery
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`discharge (such as during a long hill climb) and enough
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`"headroom" to absorb a long period of charging such as that
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`which occurs during a long downhill. If the SOC is not
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`maintained within the 50-70% region, the performance may be
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`compromised. This diminished performance may take the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`form of lost regenerative energy or limited power output
`
`
`during accelerations.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Capacity - The capacity of the pack is comparatively easy
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`to measure, and the effects of the change of capacity on the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`strategy are fairly intuitive. (It should be noted that the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`capacity at one rate of discharge is different from the capacity
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`at another rate, and therefore the definition of "capacity" is
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`subject to discussion.) In general, the larger the battery pack
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`capacity, the more the vehicle can be run like an pure electric
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`vehicle with the APU providing supplemental power. With a
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`large capacity, it is' easier to achieve the power required for
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`standard driving, and the pack does not have to be so rigidly
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`constrained to a small window of states of charge. A small
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`pack, however, must be used almost exclusively as a short-
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`terrn energy buffer without significant energy storage.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Transient Capabilities - A battery can change pOWer levels
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`almost instantaneously, unlike the APU which is limited by its
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`mechanical inertia. When the APU cannot respond quickly
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`enough to fluctuations in power demand, the battery must
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`make up the difference. The battery must be able to sustain
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`output at a peak power during these transients until the APUs
`
`
`
`
`
`
`power output reaches the commanded power.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`L_ife - Unfortunately, most available data on battery life is
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`of limited applicability to hybrid systems. The complexities of
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`the reactions within batteries make it almost impossible to
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`predict battery life except as a questionable extrapolation of
`
`
`
`
`
`filthough few quantitative predictions of
`Page 6 of 9
`
`68
`
`
`
`Page 6 of 9
`
`FORD 1219
`
`
`
`Thermostat Made
`
`I; 80E60’40
`
`@100
`
`E 20
`g 0
`"’
`
`1500
`
`2500
`Time (5)
`
`3500
`
`Follower Mode
`
`@100
`I; 80
`
`§ 0m
`
`3°60_
`“ ‘°_3 20
`
`1500
`
`2500
`Time (s)
`
`3500
`
`Figure 8: The state of charge during repetitions of the
`federal urban driving cycle with a constant APU at 20 kW
`in the thermostat mode (see figures 2,3) and in the
`follower mode(see figure 4).
`
`WW - The maximum power output of
`the APU will affect strategy design choices in a similar
`manner to the capacity of the battery. With a high power
`capability, one may design the strategy to operate more or less
`like a conventional car engine in a power following mode,
`whereas a low power capability will force the strategy to run
`the engine at its highest power level so that it can keep up with
`current demands and store extra energy for periods of high
`demand.
`
`W - Mechanically, the transient
`capabilities of an engine are limited by the inertia involved in
`increasing or decreasing the engine speed. Although slower
`transients are desirable for reducing emissions, slow transients
`can curtail the life of the battery or potentially harm the
`engine. For example, slow transients can be a serious problem
`during a transition from a hard acceleration to a hard braking.
`If the APU has been commanded by the control strategy to
`supply a high power during an acceleration, and suddenly full
`regenerative braking is required, the LLB may not be able to
`accept the total power coming to it, unless the APU can reduce
`its power quickly. This limitation will cause a loss of much of
`the regenerative energy available. In an extreme case, the
`APU may be unloaded by an over-voltage condition, leading
`to potential overspeed. The APU control strategy must be
`robust, such that no combination of driver actions will result in
`damage to any drivetrain component.
`
`Eye] Effigjency - The fuel efficiency of an APU generally
`varies as a function of the power level. The specific fuel
`consumption (SFC) of an engine is typically best at middle
`power levels and worst at the low and high power extremes.
`The APU operating strategy that will maximize fuel efficiency
`is one that runs the APU primarily in the range of powers over
`which the SFC is best (often termed the engine's "sweet spot").
`The ratin of the highest power level to the lowest power level
`
`Page 7 of 9
`
`69
`
`used in the strategy is called the turn down ratio. The
`narrower this sweet spot is, and, thus, the smaller the most
`efficient turn down ratio is, the more the fuel efficiency
`requirements constrain the strategy toward a thermostat mode
`(see figure 9, a series of SFC graphs showing varying sweet
`spots). Increasing the range of high efficiency and thus the
`turn down ratio and the ability of the strategy to follow drive
`power more closely (therefore relieving some stress on the
`battery) can increase the complexity and cost of the engine or
`lower the peak fuel efficiency. Tradeoffs must be made
`between engine complexity, cost, fuel efficiency, and battery
`lifetime. For example, if a long battery lifetime is the most
`important aspect of the system, then a large sweet spot is
`desired, possibly sacrificing engine simplicity, efficiency, or
`low engine emissions. In a situation where the average power
`is fairly constant a smaller sweet spot may be the most
`efficient solution.
`
`Emisigns, - Frequently, one of the principle aims of a
`hybrid vehicle is to reduce vehicle emissions to ULEV (Ultra
`Low Emission Vehicle) levels. Consequently, APU emissions
`are very important for system success. In general, emissions
`are minimized when a stoichiometric air to fuel ratio is
`maintained by a closed loop feedback system (using an oxygen
`sensor for feedback). In some operating regimes, such as
`engine starts and transients, the stoichiometric ratio is very
`difficult to maintain resulting in an increase in emissions.
`During a cold-start, the engine must run rich to achieve
`sufficient vaporization of the fuel. Rich running results in
`high hydrocarbons (HC) and carbon monoxide (CO)
`emissions, but low nitrogen oxides (NOx) emissions. A hot-
`start has many of the same problems as a cold start, but the
`time duration before the engine and catalytic converter warm
`up is much shorter. A hybrid strategy which minimizes engine
`cycling will minimize start—related emissions, but that may
`require that the engine have a higher tum-down ratio.
`Transients present an emissions problem that is largely
`related to the speed of the transient. The closed loop feedback
`system that maintains the stoichiometric air fuel ratio is
`sufficient during quasivsteady state modes, however, it can
`only react as fast as the 02 levels can be sensed. If the
`transient is too fast, the engine may run rich, increasing CO
`and HC emissions, or lean, increasing NOx emissions. Some
`of this effect can be reduced using a hybrid strategy that only
`allows slow transients, but this places greater strain on the
`LLD.
`
`As a series hybrid vehicle decouples both the speed and
`the power of the APU from the speed and power requirement
`at the wheels, this extra degree of freedom can also be used to
`reduce emissions. For a given required power output, there
`are many combinations of speed and torque that could be used
`to provide that power. If the engine is run in a low speed, high
`load state, the fuel efficiency, noise, and hydrocarbon
`emissions are all improved. At high loads, however, the NOx
`emissions are high and traditional NOx reducing measures
`such as Exhaust Gas Recirculation (EGR) are more difficult.
`Choosing this optimum engine operating point as a function of
`power is an important design consideration but it is not
`necessarily part of the hybrid strategy design.
`
`MW - Engine noise is not
`much of an issue as far as the performance of a drivetrain is
`concerned, but to avoid customer distress, it must be
`considered as an influencing factor on a hybrid strategy. For
`example, a strategy that has the engine On at full power while
`
`FORD 1219
`
`8
`8
`
`Page 7 of 9
`
`FORD 1219
`
`
`
`—|
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`all declarations up to 0.25 g, then feather in the rear brakes to
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`prevent skidding and instability during hard decelerations.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`The amount of energy available from regenerative braking
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`influences the fuel economy greatly, especially in heavy stop
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`and go traffic. The efficiency of the regenerative braking
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`depends on the resistance of the battery to charging and,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`therefore, on the state of charge of the battery. This, once
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`again, creates conflicting optimization factors, for the APU
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`cannot be run at its most efficient point if it is desired that the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`battery stay within a certain range of SOCs. The APU must be
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`run within its limited high efficiency range and the battery
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`must be maintained around a state of charge that has minimum
`
`
`
`
`charge and discharge resistances.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`COST - Inasmuch as hybrid powertrains must compete
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`against conventional powertrains for cost and performance, the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`overall success of the powertrain is extremely dependent on
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`cost. More expensive components may increase the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`capabilities and the life, but if that makes the system
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`unsaleable, the improvements are useless. In the end, every
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`tradeoff that is made in the powertrain system must be done
`with cost in mind.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`DEVELOPMENT OF A WORKING STRATEGY
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`The design of hybrid systems must begin with the overall
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`system constraints. Depending on the type of vehicle (for
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`example, a large passenger car or a delivery truck),
`there are
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`weight and volume limits. These limits include both the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`general physical dimensions of the car as well as the physical
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`characteristics of the powertrain. These limits and the power
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`requirements of the system provide an initial basis for
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`choosing the relative sizes of the APU and the LLD. System
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`power electronics are more efficient if constrained to within a
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`fairly narrow bus voltage range. This additional limiting
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`factor must also be considered in the component design.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`These constraints, along with the control strategy provide the
`
`
`
`
`
`system wide link between components.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`All of the design factors discussed above influence the
`characteristics of the final vehicle; therefore, it is crucial to
`
`
`
`
`