throbber
United States Patent
`
`[19]
`
`[11] Patent Number:
`
`5,343,970
`
`Severinsky
`
`[45] Date of Patent:
`
`Sep. 6, 1994
`
`US005343970A
`
`[54] HYBRID ELECTRIC VEHICLE
`
`[76]
`
`Inventor: Alex J. Severinsky, 10904 Pebble
`Run, Silver Spring, Md. 20902
`
`[21] Appl. No.2 947,691
`
`[22] Filed:
`
`Sep. 21, 1992
`
`Int. Cl.5 ................................................ B60K 6/04
`[51]
`[52] US. Cl. .................................. 180/652; 1 80/65.6;
`180/165; 60/718; 475/2; 475/5
`[58] Field of Search .................... 180/65.2, 65.3, 65.4,
`ISO/65.6, 165; 60/716, 718; 475/2, 5, 8, 9
`
`[56]
`
`References Cited
`U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS
`
`3,525,874 8/1970 Toy .................................... 180/65.2
`...... 180/65.2
`3,566,717 3/1971 Berman et a1.
`
`3,650,345 3/1972 Yardney .................. 1 80/65.2
`
`...... 180/65.2
`5/1973 Berman et al.
`3,732,751
`
`3,791,473 2/1974 Rosen .................. 180/65.2
`
`3,837,419 9/1974 Nakamura .
`...... 180/65.4
`3,874,472 4/1975 Deane ............. 180/65.4
`
`3,923,115 12/ 1975 Helling ............ 180/65.2
`
`4,042,056 8/1977 Horwinski .
`...... 180/65.2
`
`4,095,664 6/1978 Bray .................... 180/65.4
`
`4,148,192 4/1979 Cummings.
`...... 180/65.2
`4,180,138 12/1979 Shea............... 180/652
`
`4,269,280 5/1981 Rosen ..................... 180/65.2
`4,305,254 12/1981 Kawakatsu et a].
`.
`...... 180/65.2
`
`4,306,156 12/1981 Monaco et a1. ............ 180/65.2
`
`1/1982 Park .................... 180/65.2
`4,313,080
`4,335,429 6/ 1982 Kawakatsu ........... l 80/65.2
`
`4,351,405 9/1982 Fields et a1.
`..
`......
`ISO/65.2
`...... 180/65.4
`4,354,144 10/1982 McCarthy .
`4,400,997 8/ 1983 Fiala ................ l 80/65.2
`
`4,405,029 9/1983 Hunt ........................... 180/65.2
`
`4,407,132 10/1983 Kawakatsu et a1.
`.
`...... 180/65.4
`
`.. 180/65.2
`4,43 8,342 3/1984 Kenyon ................
`..... 60/718
`4,439,989 4/1984 Yamakawa
`
`4,470,476 9/1984 Hunt .........................
`. . 180/65.2
`4,533,011 8/ 1985 Heidemeyer et a1.
`............. 180/65.2
`
`4,562,894 1/ 1986 Yang .............................. 180/65.2
`4,578,955 4/1986 Medina ............................... 180/65.4
`
`4,593,779 6/1986 Krdhling ............................ ISO/65.4
`4,611,466 9/1986 Keedy ............ 60/718
`
`..
`4,697,660 10/1987 Wu et a1.
`180/652
`4,815,334 3/1989 Lexen ............. 74/661
`4,923,025
`5/1990 Ellers ...........
`180/652
`4,951,769
`8/1990 Kawamura .......
`ISO/65.4
`5,053,632 10/1991 Suzuki et a1.
`ISO/65.2
`5,117,931
`6/1992 Nishida .................. ISO/65.2
`
`6/1992 Fjallstrom ...................... 180/65.4X
`5,120,282
`
`
`
`OTHER PUBLICATIONS
`
`SAE Technical Paper Series 891659, Bullock, pp.
`11—26, Aug. 7—10, 1989.
`SAE Technical Paper Series 910247, Kalberlah, pp.
`69—78, Feb. 25—Mar. l, 1991.
`
`Primary Examiner—Margaret A. Focarino
`Assistant Examiner—Peter C. English
`
`[57]
`
`ABSTRACT
`
`An improved hybrid electric vehicle includes an inter-
`nal combustion engine and an electric motor. Both the
`motor and the engine provide torque to drive the vehi-
`cle directly through a controllable torque transfer unit.
`Typically at low speeds or in traffic, the electric motor
`alone drives the vehicle, using power stored in batteries;
`under acceleration and during hill climbing both the
`engine and the motor provide torque to drive the vehi-
`cle; and in steady state highway cruising, the internal
`combustion engine alone drives the vehicle. The inter-
`nal combustion engine is sized to operate at or near its
`maximum fuel efficiency during highway cruising. The
`motor is operable as a generator to charge the batteries
`as needed and also for regenerative braking. No trans-
`mission is employed. The motor operates at signifi-
`cantly lower currents and higher voltages than conven-
`tionally and has a rated power at least equal to that of
`the internal combustion engine. In this manner a cost
`efficient vehicle is provided, suffering no performance
`disadvantage compared to conventional vehicles.
`
`40 Claims, 12 Drawing Sheets
`
`NR6
`
`50
`
`TWO-WAY
`
`34
`
`20
`
`44
`
`22/
`
`TORQUE—LE
`TRANSFER UNIT
`
`:M MIMI!t
`
`POLARITY
`CURRENT
`
`FUEL
`
`\
`3B
`
`OPERATOR
`commas
`
`ACCELERATION
`DIRECTION
`orcnrnmon
`
`ENGINE SPEED
`MOTOR SPED
`BATTERY VOLTAGE
`BATTERY CHARGE
`AMBIENT TEMP.
`
`DATA INPUT
`
`Page 1 of 27
`
`FORD 1205
`
`Page 1 of 27
`
`FORD 1205
`
`

`

`US. Patent
`
`Sep. 6, 1994
`
`Sheet 1 of 12
`
`5,343,970
`
`9%Samuzazu Sod8%838a..»8°.“8°.—
`.IIMx
`
`
` \\S\\_\.(\asm§i§§.k\\x/$02coiracoo333:28\u.)
`
`
`l\\\255238..\\.838.SA.
`
`l\|.l.1‘c
`
`$226._8«92/onm
`
`E8mm3amm
`
`2:
`
`_.o_.._
`
`E2”5?;
`
`Page 2 of 27
`
`FORD 1205
`
`Page 2 of 27
`
`FORD 1205
`
`

`

`US. Patent
`
`Sep. 6, 1994
`
`Sheet 2 of 12
`
`5,343,970
`
`t8:-“Ex335235380
`
`:2:2:22
`
`\II‘.‘
`\
`
`\3.8:.8:62
`
`
`332.$80:\\
`
`2253.:
`
`.SE;a:3$895%
`
`
`
`532.2:98
`
`3:823
`9:95
`
`
`
`2%:swammzazm
`
`No:
`
`8%8383
`
`ON
`
`OF
`
`)
`
`(du) ‘L-NHS ENIONEI 3H]. N0 mmoa
`
`Page 3 of 27
`
`FORD 1205
`
`Page 3 of 27
`
`FORD 1205
`
`

`

`US. Patent
`
`Sep. 6, 1994
`
`Sheet 3 of 12
`
`5,343,970
`
`x
`
`mm38
`
`8?
`
`4____:__Eco-E-
`
`“3:3Eta285982\cum—mmmos:moxieEBBzofimmagimmean5%.<5
`3.-mm3..
`
`Bummmzazm
`
`
`
`
`
`m0ENEHEai225.538852:8
`
`
`
`
`
`a:
`2
`
`Page 4 of 27
`
`FORD 1205
`
`Page 4 of 27
`
`FORD 1205
`
`

`

`US. Patent
`
`Sep. 6, 1994
`
`Sheet 4 of 12
`
`5,343,970
`
`I34
`
`:24
`
`‘0
`no”
`N\_
`
`22
`
`22
`
`
`
`FIG.4‘
`
`_A'Illl
`
`7o
`
`I
`
`20-l44 a46
`
`
`Page 5 of 27
`
`FORD 1205
`
`Page 5 of 27
`
`FORD 1205
`
`

`

`US. Patent
`
`Sep. 6, 1994
`
`Sheet 5 of 12
`
`5,343,970
`
`l34
`
`.94
`
`£0
`no“
`N\
`
`2?
`
`FIG.5
`
`22
`
`7o
`
`I
`
`_A'11],
`
`20-|44 I4-6
`
`
`Page 6 of 27
`
`FORD 1205
`
`Page 6 of 27
`
`FORD 1205
`
`

`

`US. Patent
`
`Sep. 6, 1994
`
`Sheet 6 of 12
`
`5,343,970
`
`46
`
`22
`
`'nI34‘
`202644
`.,70v9”FIG.6
`.+=I
`
`
`48
`
`I
`
`Page 7 of 27
`
`FORD 1205
`
`Page 7 of 27
`
`FORD 1205
`
`

`

`US. Patent
`
`Sep. 6, 1994
`
`Sheet 7 of 12
`
`5,343,970
`
`I34
`
`‘461 22
`20 -|44
`
`.'.FIG.7
`
`
`Page 8 of 27
`
`FORD 1205
`
`Page 8 of 27
`
`FORD 1205
`
`

`

`US. Patent
`
`Sep. 6, 1994
`
`Sheet 8 of 12
`
`5,343,970
`
`
`
`Page 9 of 27
`
`.
`
`FORD 1205
`
`Page 9 of 27
`
`FORD 1205
`
`

`

`US. Patent
`
`Sep. 6, 1994
`
`Sheet 9 of 12
`
`5,343,970
`
`A
`
`3“
`
`0‘!
`-

`r9 - g9
`
`- N
`
`'2 L'—
`
`
`
`Page 10 of 27
`
`FORD 1205
`
`Page 10 of 27
`
`FORD 1205
`
`

`

`U
`
`Sep 6 1994
`
`5,343,970
`
`.11.,mm31p.mS.P
`t8.mmgmw3.
`
`mmNaomoh
`
`mwmzéh
`
`STN
`
`E.22.30s:
`
`8.VAEEZR‘.,‘3aMW/é—wfimg.u|\
`.“llmulldoeNu!”
`mzazm:2:Es
`
`
`
`(:5
`
`LL
`
`n88onw//-fi3%?TN»\
`
`7
`
`FORD 1205
`
`Page 11 of 27
`
`FORD 1205
`
`
`
`
`

`

`US. Patent
`
`Sep. 6, 1994
`
`Sheet 11 of 12
`
`5,343,970
`
`114
`
`
`GENERKKfii.
`
`FREQUENCY
`
`N
`1—
`v—
`
`N
`1'-
`1—
`
`118
`
`110
`
`A
`
`110
`
`B
`
`PHASEY
`
`PHASEZ
`
`116
`
`PHASEX
`
`FIG.12
`
`Page 12 of 27
`
`FORD 1205
`
`Page 12 of 27
`
`FORD 1205
`
`

`

`U.S1 Patent
`
`Sep. 6, 1994
`
`Sheet 12 of 12
`
`5,343,970 '
`
`+ TORQUE
`
` SLIP ANGLE
`
`—
`
`+
`
`GENERATOR
`
`
`
`Page 13 of 27
`
`FORD 1205
`
`Page 13 of 27
`
`FORD 1205
`
`

`

`1
`
`HYBRID ELECTRIC VEHICLE
`
`BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
`
`5,343,970
`
`2
`tween the diesel engine and the wheels of the locomo-
`tive. More particularly, an internal combustion engine
`produces zero torque at zero engine speed (RPM) and
`reaches its torque peak somewhere in the middle of its
`operating range. Accordingly, all vehicles driven di-
`rectly by an internal combustion engine (other than
`certain single-speed vehicles using friction or centrifu-
`gal clutches, and not useful for normal driving) require
`a multiple speed transmission between the engine and
`the wheels, so that the engine’s torque can be matched
`to the road speeds and loads encountered. Further,
`some sort of clutch must be provided so that the engine
`can be decoupled from the wheels, allowing the vehicle
`to stop while the engine is still running, and to allow
`some slippage of the engine with respect to the drive
`train while starting from a stop. It would not be practi-
`cal to provide a diesel locomotive with a multiple speed
`transmission, or a clutch. Accordingly, the additional
`complexity of the generator and electric traction mo-
`tors is accepted. Electric traction motors produce full
`torque at zero RPM and thus can be connected directly
`to the wheels; when it is desired that the train should
`accelerate, the diesel engine is simply throttled to in-
`crease the generator output and the train begins to
`move.
`
`The same drive system may be employed in a smaller
`vehicle such as an automobile or truck, but has several
`distinct disadvantages in this application. In particular,
`it is well known that a gasoline or other internal com-
`bustion engine is most efficient when producing near its
`maximum output torque. Typically, the number of die-
`sel locomotives on a train is selected in accordance with
`the total tonnage to be moved and the grades to be
`overcome, so that all the locomotives can be operated at
`nearly full torque production. Moreover, such locomo-
`tives tend to be run at steady speeds for long periods of
`time. Reasonably efficient fuel use is thus achieved.
`However, such a direct drive vehicle would not achieve
`good fuel efficiency in typical automotive use, involv-
`ing many short trips, frequent stops in traffic, extended
`low-speed operation and the like.
`So-called “series hybrid” electric vehicles have been
`proposed wherein batteries are used as energy storage
`devices, so that the engine can be operated in its most
`fuel-efficient output power range while still allowing
`the electric traction motor(s) powering the vehicle to be
`operated as required. Thus the engine may be loaded by
`supplying torque to a generator charging the batteries
`while supplying electrical power to the traction mo-
`tor(s) as required, so as to operate efficiently. This sys-
`tem overcomes the limitations of electric vehicles noted
`
`above with respect to limited range and long recharge
`times.
`However, such series hybrid electric vehicles are
`inefficient and grossly uneconomical, for the following
`reasons. In a conventional vehicle, the internal combus-
`tion engine delivers torque to the wheels directly. In a
`series hybrid electric vehicle, torque is delivered from
`the engine via a serially connected generator, battery
`charger, inverter and the traction motor. Energy trans-
`fer between those components consumes at least ap-
`proximately 25% of engine power. Further such com-
`ponents add substantially to the cost and weight of the
`vehicle. Thus, series hybrid vehicles have not been
`immediately successful.
`A more promising “parallel hybrid” approach is
`shown in US. Pat. Nos. 3,566,717 and 3,732,751 to
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`1. Field of the Invention
`This invention is in the field of hybrid electric vehi-
`cles incorporating both an internal combustion engine,
`such as a gasoline engine, and an electric motor as
`sources of torque to drive the vehicle. More particu-
`larly, this invention relates to a hybrid electric vehicle
`that is fully competitive with presently conventional
`vehicles as regards performance, operating conve-
`nience, and cost, while achieving substantially im-
`proved fuel economy and reduced pollutant emissions.
`2. Discussion of the Prior Art
`For many years great attention has been given to the
`problem of reduction of fuel consumption of automo-
`biles and other highway vehicles. Concomitantly very
`substantial attention has been paid to reduction of pol-
`lutants emitted by automobiles and other vehicles. To a
`degree, efforts to solve these problems conflict with one
`another. For example, increased thermodynamic effi-
`ciency and thus reduced fuel consumption can be real-
`ized if an engine is operated at higher temperatures.
`Thus there has been substantial interest in engines built
`of ceramic materials withstanding higher combustion
`temperatures than those now in use. However, higher
`combustion temperatures in gasoline-fueled engines
`lead to increase in certain undesirable pollutants, typi-
`cally NOx.
`Another possibility for reducing emissions is to burn
`mixtures of gasoline and ethanol (“gasoho ”) or straight
`ethanol. However, to date ethanol has not become eco-
`nomically competitive with gasoline and consumers
`have not accepted ethanol to any great degree.
`One proposal for reducing pollution in cities is to
`limit the use of vehicles powered by internal combus-
`tion engines and instead employ electric vehicles pow-
`ered by rechargeable batteries. To date, all such electric
`cars have a very limited range, typically no more than
`150‘miles, have insufficient power for acceleration and
`hill climbing except when the batteries are fully
`charged, and require substantial time for battery re-
`charging. Thus, while there are many circumstances in
`which the limited range and extended recharge time of 45
`the batteries would not be an inconvenience, such cars
`are not suitable for all the travel requirements of most
`individuals. Accordingly, an electric car would have to
`be an additional vehicle for most users, posing a sub-
`stantial economic deterrent. Moreover, it will be appre-
`ciated that in the United States most electricity is gener-
`ated in coal-fired power plants, so that using electric
`vehicles merely moves the source of the pollution, but
`does not eliminate it. Furthermore, comparing the re-
`spective net costs per mile of driving, electric vehicles
`are not competitive with ethanol-fueled vehicles, much
`less with conventional gasoline-fueled vehicles.
`Much attention has also been paid over the years to
`development of electric vehicles including internal
`combustion engines powering generators, thus eliminat-
`ing the defect of limited range exhibited by simple elec-
`tric vehicles. The simplest such vehicles operate on the
`same general principle as diesel-electric locomotives
`used by most railroads. In such systems, an internal
`combustion engine drives a generator providing electric
`power to traction motors connected directly to the
`wheels of the vehicle. This system has the advantage
`that no variable gear ratio transmission is required be-
`
`50
`
`55
`
`65
`
`Page 14 of 27
`
`FORD 1205
`
`Page 14 of 27
`
`FORD 1205
`
`

`

`5,343,970
`
`3
`Berman et al. In Berman et al an internal combustion
`engine and an electric motor are matched through a
`complex gear train so that both can provide torque
`directly to the wheels.
`In Berman et al, the internal combustion engine is run
`in several different modes. Where the output of the
`internal combustion engine is more than necessary to
`drive the vehicle (“first mode operation”) the engine is
`run at constant speed and excess power is converted by
`a first generator (“Speeder”) to electrical energy for
`storage in a battery. In “second mode operation”, the
`internal combustion engine drives the wheels directly,
`and is throttled. When more power is needed than the
`engine can provide, a second motor generator or
`“torquer” provides additional torque as needed.
`The present invention relates to such a parallel hybrid
`vehicle, but addresses certain substantial deficiencies of
`the Berman et a1 design. For example, Berman et al
`show two separate electric motor/generators powered
`by the internal combustion engine to charge batteries
`and to drive the vehicle forward in traffic. This arrange-
`ment is a source of additional complexity, cost and
`difficulty, as two separate modes of engine control are
`required, and the operator must control the transition
`between the several modes of operation. Further the
`gear train shown by Berman et a1 appears to be quite
`complex and diffith to manufacture economically.
`Berman et al also indicate that one or even two variable-
`speed transmissions may be required; see col. 3, lines
`19—22 and 36—38.
`Hunt U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,405,029 and 4,470,476 also
`disclose parallel hybrids requiring complex gearing
`arrangements, including multiple speed transmissions.
`More specifically,
`the Hunt patents disclose several
`embodiments of parallel hybrid vehicles. Hunt indicates
`(see col. 4, lines 6-20 of the ’476 patent) that an electric
`motor may drive the vehicle at low speeds up to 20
`mph, and an internal combustion engine used for speeds
`above 20 mph, while “in certain speed ranges, such as
`from 15—30 mph, both power sources may be energized.
`.
`.
`. Additionally, both power sources could be utilized
`under heavy load conditions.” Hunt also indicates that
`“the vehicle could be provided with an automatic
`changeover device which automatically shifts from the
`electrical power source to the internal combustion
`power source, depending on the speed of the vehicle”
`(col. 4, lines 12—16).
`However, the Hunt vehicle does not meet the objects
`of the present invention. Hunt’s vehicle in each embodi-
`ment requires a conventional manual or automatic
`transmission. See col. 2, lines 6—7. Moreover, the inter-
`nal combustion engine is connected to the transfer case
`(wherein torque from the internal combustion engine
`and electric motor is combined) by a “fluid coupling or
`torque converter of conventional construction”. Col. 2,
`lines 16-17. Such transmissions and fluid couplings or
`torque converters are very inefficient, are heavy, bulky,
`and costly, and are to be eliminated according to one
`object of the present invention.
`Furthermore, the primary means of battery charging
`disclosed by Hunt involves a further undesirable com-
`plexity, namely a turbine driving the electric motor in
`generator configuration. The turbine is fueled by waste
`heat from the internal combustion engine. See col. 3,
`lines 10-60. Hunt’s internal combustion engine is also
`fitted with an alternator, for additional battery charging
`capability, adding yet further complexity. Thus it is
`clear that Hunt fails to teach a hybrid vehicle meeting
`
`4
`the objects of the present invention—that is, a hybrid
`vehicle competitive with conventional vehicles with
`respect to performance, cost and complexity, while
`achieving substantially improved fuel efficiency.
`Kawakatsu U.S. Pat. No. 4,335,429 shows a parallel
`hybrid involving a single internal combustion engine
`and two electric motors to allow efficient use of the
`electric motors, and is directed principally to a complex
`control scheme.
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`40
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`60
`
`65
`
`Numerous patents disclose hybrid vehicle drives
`tending to fall into one or more of the categories dis-
`cussed above. A number of patents disclose systems
`wherein an operator is required to select between elec-
`tric and internal combustion operation; for example an
`electric motor is provided for operation inside buildings
`where exhaust fumes would be dangerous. In several
`cases the electric motor drives one set of wheels and the
`internal combustion engine drives a different set. See
`generally, U.S. Pat. Nos.; Shea (4,180,138); Fields et al
`(4,351,405); Kenyon (4,438,342); Krtihling (4,593,779);
`and Ellers (4,923,025).
`Numerous other patents show hybrid vehicle drives
`wherein a variable speed transmission is required. A
`transmission as noted above is typically required where
`the electric motor is not capable of supplying sufficient
`torque at
`low speeds. See U.S. Pat. Nos.; Rosen
`(3,791,473); Rosen (4,269,280); Fiala (4,400,997); and
`Wu et a1 (4,697,660). For further examples of series
`hybrid vehicles as discussed above, see generally Bray
`(4,095,664); Cummings (4,148,192); Kawakatsu et a1
`(4,305,254 and 4,407,132); Monaco et a1 (4,306,156);
`Park (4,313,080); McCarthy (4,354,144); Heidemeyer
`(4,533,011); Kawamura (4,951,769); and Suzuki et a1
`(5,053,632). Other patents of general relevance to this
`subject matter
`include Toy (3,525,874); Yardney
`(3,650,345); Nakamura (3,837,419); Deane (3,874,472);
`Horwinski
`(4,042,056); Yang
`(4,562,894); Keedy
`(4,611,466); and Lexen (4,815,334).
`U.S. Pat. No. 4,578,955 to Medina shows a hybrid
`system wherein a gas turbine is used as the internal
`combustion engine to drive a generator as needed to
`charge batteries. Of particular interest to certain aspects
`of the present invention is that Medina discloses that the
`battery pack should have a voltage in the range of 144,
`168 or 216 volts and the generator should deliver cur-
`rent in the range of 400 to 500 amperes. Those of skill in
`the art will recognize that these high currents involve
`substantial resistance heating losses, and additionally
`require that all electrical connections be made by posi-
`tive mechanical means such as bolts and nuts, or by
`welding. More specifically, for reasons of safety and in
`accordance with industry practice, currents in excess of
`about 50 amperes carmot be carried by the conventional
`plug-in connectors preferred for reasons of convenience
`and economy, but must be carried by much heavier,
`more expensive and less convenient fixed connectors (as
`used on conventional starter and battery cable connec-
`tions). Accordingly, it would be desirable to operate the
`electric motor of a hybrid vehicle at lower currents.
`U.S. Pat. No. 4,439,989 to Yamakawa shows a system
`wherein two different internal combustion engines are
`provided so that only one need be run when the load is
`low. This arrangement would be complex and expen-
`sive to manufacture.
`
`Detailed discussion of various aspects of hybrid vehi-
`cle drives may be found in Kalberlah, “Electric Hybrid
`Drive Systems for Passenger Cars and Taxis”, SAE
`Paper No. 910247 (1991), and in Bullock, “The Techno-
`
`Page 15 of 27
`
`FORD 1205
`
`Page 15 of 27
`
`FORD 1205
`
`

`

`5,343,970
`
`5
`logical Constraints of Mass, Volume, Dynamic Power
`Range and Energy Capacity on the Viability of Hybrid
`and Electric Vehicles”, SAE Paper No. 891659 (1989).
`Further related papers are collected in Electric and
`Hybrid Vehicle Technology, volume SP—915, published
`by SAE in February 1992. Reference herein to the latter
`volume does not concede its effectiveness as prior. art
`with respect to the claims of the present application.
`It can thus be seen that while the prior art clearly
`discloses the desirability of operating an internal com-
`bustion engine in its most efficient operating range, and
`that a battery may be provided to store energy to be
`supplied to an electric motor in order to even out the
`load on the internal combustion engine, there remains
`substantial room for improvement. In particular, it is
`desired to obtain the operational flexibility of a parallel
`hybrid system, while optimizing the system’s opera-
`tional parameters and providing a substantially simpli-
`fied parallel hybrid system as compared to those shown
`in the prior art.
`
`OBJECTS AND SUMMARY OF THE
`INVENTION
`
`It is an object of the invention to provide an im-
`proved hybrid electric vehicle realizing substantially
`increased fuel economy and reduced pollutant emis-
`sions as compared to present day vehicles while suffer-
`ing no significant penalty in performance, operating
`convenience, cost, complexity, or weight.
`It is a more particular object of the present invention
`to provide an improved parallel hybrid electric vehicle
`wherein an internal combustion engine and an electric
`motor can separately or simultaneously apply torque to
`the driving wheels of the vehicle, controlled to realize
`maximum fuel efficiency at no penalty in convenience,
`performance, or cost.
`It is a further object of the invention to provide a
`parallel hybrid electric vehicle wherein the electric
`motor provides output power equal to at least 100 per-
`cent of the rated output power of the internal combus-
`tion engine, and more preferably up to about 150-200
`percent thereof, so that the engine operates under sub-
`stantially optimum conditions in order to realize sub-
`stantial fuel economy of operation.
`More particularly, it is an object of the invention to
`provide a parallel hybrid electric vehicle wherein the
`internal combustion engine is sized to efficiently pro-
`vide the average power required for operation at mod-
`erate and highway speeds, with the electric motor sized
`to deliver the additional power needed for acceleration
`and hill climbing.
`Still another object of the invention is to provide a
`hybrid electric vehicle wherein the electric motor and
`battery charging circuits operate at no more than about
`30—50 amperes maximum current, whereby resistance
`heating losses are greatly reduced, and whereby inex-
`pensive and simple electrical manufacturing and con-
`nection techniques can be employed.
`It is a further object of the invention to provide a
`solid-state switching power converter for converting
`DC power provided by the batteries of a parallel hybrid
`electric vehicle to AC power of higher frequency than
`conventionally employed for supply to an AC induction
`motor for powering the vehicle as needed, and for con-
`verting mechanical energy provided to the induction
`motor when operated as a generator to DC energy for
`charging the batteries as required.
`
`6
`Other aspects and objects of the invention will be-
`come clear as the discussion below proceeds.
`The present invention satisfies the needs of the art
`and objects of the invention mentioned above by provi-
`sion of an improved parallel hybrid electric vehicle. An
`internal combustion engine and an AC induction motor
`are arranged to supply torque through a controllable
`torque transfer unit to the driving wheels of the vehicle.
`The motor is driven at relatively high voltage, rela-
`tively high frequency, and relatively low maximum
`current. Energy stored in batteries is transformed into
`AC drive pulses of appropriate frequency and shape by
`a solid state switching unit comprising metal oxide semi-
`conductor (MOS) controlled thyristors. No variable
`gear ratio transmission is required by the vehicle of the
`present invention, as the AC electric motor provides
`adequate torque at low RPM. Inefficiencies particularly
`inherent in automatic transmissions are thus eliminated.
`A microprocessor receives control inputs from the
`driver of the vehicle and monitors the performance of
`the electric motor and the internal combustion engine,
`the state of charge of the battery, and other significant
`variables. The microprocessor determines whether the
`internal combustion engine or the electric motor or
`both should provide torque to the wheels under various
`monitored operating conditions. Typically, the electric
`motor operates under battery power during low speed
`Operation, e.g., in traffic, during reverse operation, or
`the like. In this mode of operation, the energy transfer
`efficiency from the batteries to the wheels is very high.
`By comparison, it will be appreciated that a vast amount
`of fuel is wasted as internal combustion engines of con-
`ventional vehicles idle uselessly at stop lights or in traf-
`fic. This source of inefficiency and pollution is elimi-
`nated according to the invention.
`As the road speed increases, the internal combustion
`engine is started, using torque provided by the electric
`motor through the torque transfer unit, such that no
`separate starter is required. The internal combustion
`engine is sized to operate near maximum efficiency
`during steady state cruising on the highway, at between
`about 35 and 65 mph; at these times the electric motor is
`not powered. When necessary for acceleration or hill
`climbing, the electric motor is operated to add its torque
`to that provided by the internal combustion engine.
`Under braking or coasting conditions,
`the electric
`motor may be operated as a generator to charge the
`batteries.
`
`For comparison to an example of the hybrid electric
`vehicle of the invention, a conventional 3,300 pound
`sedan is typically powered by a 165 horsepower internal
`combustion engine driving the rear wheels through an
`automatic transmission. However, during highway
`cruising and in traffic, that is, under the most common
`operating conditions, only 2—30 hp is required. There-
`fore, the internal combustion engine of a conventional
`vehicle rarely operates near maximum efficiency. More-
`over, as noted, such vehicles are normally driven
`through notoriously inefficient automatic transmissions;
`specifically, such transmissions are typically only about
`60% efficient during operation in the indirect gears, i.e.,
`during acceleration.
`A comparable 3,300 pound sedan according to the
`invention has an internal combustion engine of about 45
`horsepower working in concert with a 65 horsepower
`electric motor, without a transmission. This combina-
`tion provides acceleration and hill climbing perfor-
`mance equivalent to a conventional vehicle with a 165
`
`5
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`65
`
`Page 16 of 27
`
`FORD 1205
`
`Page 16 of 27
`
`FORD 1205
`
`

`

`5,343,970
`
`8
`
`DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED
`EMBODIMENTS
`
`7
`hp internal combustion engine with automatic transmis-
`sion, while yielding a ZOO—300% improvement in net
`fuel efficiency and at least a similar reduction in pollut-
`ants emitted. Moreover, the vehicle of the present in-
`vention is no heavier, no more bulky and no more ex-
`pensive to manufacture than conventional vehicles
`using standard internal combustion engines.
`More particularly, according to the invention, the
`internal combustion engine is operated only under the
`most efficient conditions of output power and speed.
`When the engine can be used efficiently to drive the
`vehicle forward, e.g. in highway cruising, it is so em-
`ployed. Under other circumstances, e.g. in traffic, the
`electric motor alone drives the vehicle forward and the
`internal combustion engine is used only to charge the
`batteries as needed. No transmission is required, thus
`effecting a very substantial saving in both weight and
`cost. The AC electric motor is controlled to operate as
`a constant torque source at low motor speeds, and as a
`constant power source at higher speeds. The motor
`operates at relatively low currents and relatively high
`voltage and frequency, as compared with conventional
`practice. Connections between the battery and the elec-
`tric motor are substantially simplified through the use of
`relatively low maximum current, and at relatively resis- 25
`tance heating losses are likewise reduced substantially.
`The above and still further objects, features and ad-
`vantages of the present invention will become apparent
`upon consideration of the following detailed description
`of a specific embodiment thereof, especially when taken
`in conjunction with the accompanying drawings
`wherein like reference numerals in the various figures
`are utilized to designate like components.
`BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
`
`5
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`30
`
`35
`
`Referring specifically to FIG. 1, curve 10 represents
`the output power versus engine speed (RPM) of a typi-
`cal spark ignition gasoline-fueled internal combustion
`engine as used with an automatic transmission in a typi-
`cal sedan of 3,300 pounds. As can be seen, the maximum
`engine power available is about 165 horsepower at
`about 5,000 RPM. Also shown in FIG. 1 by curve 12
`are the average power requirements of such a vehicle.
`Points C, S and H on curve 12 show average fuel con-
`sumption in city, suburban and highway driving, re-
`spectively. Point C on curve 12 shows that the average
`power required in typical city driving is less than 5 hp.
`Point S shows that the average power consumed in
`suburban driving is 10 hp, and point H shows that the
`power needed for steady-speed highway driving is only
`about 30 hp. Thus, the vehicle is vastly overpowered at
`all times except during acceleration or hill-climbing.
`FIG. 1 also includes curves indicating the relative
`fuel consumption of the engine. As can be seen, reason-
`able fuel efficiency, that is, at least about 105 percent
`relative fuel consumption (100% being ideal), is reached
`only when the engine is operated at between about
`2,000 and 4,000 RPM, when producing between about
`75 and 150 horsepower. FIG. 1 thus indicates that the
`typical internal combustion engine operates with rea-
`sonable efficiency only when producing between about
`50 and about 90% of its maximum output power. The
`typical automobile only requires such substantial power
`under conditions of extreme acceleration or hill climb-
`ing. Thus, only during relatively brief intervals is the
`engine operating efficiently. As can be seen, during
`typical highway driving, shown by point H on curve 12,
`the relative fuel consumption is on the order of 190
`percent of that required during the most efficient opera-
`tion of the engine. The situation is even worse in subur-
`ban driving, where the relative fuel consumption is
`nearly 300 percent of the most efficient value, and in
`city driving, where the relative fuel consumption is
`almost 350 percent of that required at most efficient
`operation.
`FIG. 1 thus demonstrates that an internal combustion
`engine having sufficient horsepower for adequate accel-
`eration and hill climbing capability must be so oversized
`with respect to the loads encountered during most nor-
`mal driving that the engine is grossly inefficient in its
`consumption of fuel. As noted, FIG. 1 further shows
`that only about 30 horsepower is needed to cruise on
`the highway even in a relatively large car.
`FIG. 2 is similar to FIG. 1, and illustrates the opera-
`tional characteristics of the same 3,300 pound car if
`driven by a relatively small engine having a maximum
`horsepower rating of about 45 horsepower at 4,000
`RPM. The power requirement of the vehicle during
`highway cruising, shown by point H on curve 14, is in
`the center of the most efficient region of operation of
`the engine. However, ev

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket