throbber
Trials@uspto.gov
`571-272-7822
`
`
`
`
`Paper 17
`Entered: January 28, 2016
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`
`FORD MOTOR COMPANY
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`PAICE LLC and THE ABELL FOUNDATION, INC.,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Cases
`IPR2015-00758 (Patent 7,237,634)
`IPR2015-00784 (Patent 7,237,634)
`IPR2015-00787 (Patent 7,237,634)
`IPR2015-00790 (Patent 7,237,634)
`IPR2015-00791 (Patent 7,237,634)
`IPR2015-00792 (Patent 8,214,097)
`IPR2015-00799 (Patent 7,237,634)
`______
`
`
`
`
`
`Before SALLY C. MEDLEY, KALYAN K. DESHPANDE, and
`CARL M. DeFRANCO, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`DESHPANDE, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`DECISION
`Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission
`37 C.F.R. § 42.10
`
`
`
`
`

`
`IPR2015-00784 (Patent 7,237,634)
`IPR2015-00790 (Patent 7,237,634)
`IPR2015-00792 (Patent 8,214,097)
`
`IPR2015-00758 (Patent 7,237,634)
`IPR2015-00787 (Patent 7,237,634)
`IPR2015-00791 (Patent 7,237,634)
`IPR2015-00799 (Patent 7,237,634)
`
`As authorized by the Notice of Filing Date Accorded to the Petition
`(Paper 71), Paice LLC and The Abell Foundation, Inc. (collectively, “Patent
`Owner”) filed a “Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission” (Paper 14, “Mot.”)
`of Daniel A. Tishman.2 Patent Owner is expected to continue to have a
`registered practitioner as lead counsel. Ford Motor Company (“Petitioner”)
`does not oppose Patent Owner’s Motion. Mot. 2. Patent Owner’s Motion is
`granted. See 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c); see also Unified Patents, Inc. v. Parallel
`Iron, LLC, IPR2013-00639, Order Authorizing Motion for Pro Hac Vice
`Admission, Paper 7 (October 15, 2003) (setting forth requirements for pro
`hac vice admission).3
`It is
`ORDERED that Patent Owner’s Motion for pro hac vice admission is
`granted, and Mr. Tishman is authorized to represent Patent Owner as back-
`up counsel in IPR2015-00758, IPR2015-00784, IPR2015-00787, IPR2015-
`00790, IPR2015-00791, IPR2015-00792, and IPR2015-00799;
`FURTHER ORDERED that Patent Owner is to continue to have a
`registered practitioner as lead counsel in these inter partes review
`
`
`1 All citations are to IPR2015-00758 unless otherwise noted. IPR2015-
`00784, IPR2015-00787, IPR2015-00790, IPR2015-00791, IPR2015-00792,
`and IPR2015-00799 include the same motion for pro hav vice admission of
`Mr. Tishman, and the corresponding exhibits.
`2 Patent Owner also filed an affidavit of Mr. Tishman in support of the
`Motion (Ex. 2207).
`3 Available at http://www.uspto.gov/patents-application-process/appealing-
`patent-decisions/decisions-and-opinions/representative-orders.
`2
`
`

`
`IPR2015-00784 (Patent 7,237,634)
`IPR2015-00790 (Patent 7,237,634)
`IPR2015-00792 (Patent 8,214,097)
`
`IPR2015-00758 (Patent 7,237,634)
`IPR2015-00787 (Patent 7,237,634)
`IPR2015-00791 (Patent 7,237,634)
`IPR2015-00799 (Patent 7,237,634)
`
`proceedings; and
`FURTHER ORDERED that Mr. Tishman is to comply with the Office
`Patent Trial Practice Guide and the Board’s Rules of Practice for Trials, as
`set forth in Title 37, Part 42 of the Code of Federal Regulations, and that
`Mr. Tishman is subject to the Office’s disciplinary jurisdiction under 37
`C.F.R. § 11.19(a), and the USPTO Rules of Professional Conduct set forth
`in 37 C.F.R. §§ 11.101 et seq.
`
`
`
`
`
`For PETITIONER:
`
`Frank A. Angileri
`John P. Rondini
`John M. Halan
`Todd W. Dishman
`FPGP0104IPR4@brookskushman.com
`
`Lissi Mojica
`Kevin Greenleaf
`iptdocketchi@dentons.com
`
`For PATENT OWNER:
`
`Timothy w. Riffe
`Kevin E. Greene
`Ruffin B. Cordell
`Linda L. Kordziel
`Brian J. Livedalen
`IPR36351-0015IP4@fr.com
`
`3

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket