throbber
Control Systems Engineering
`
`..A-«_.;m-A~.,..;r..arw,ar._._,,_A4
`
`William Palm III
`University of Rhode Island
`
`New York
`
`Chichester
`
`Brisbane
`
`John Wiley & Sons
`Toronto
`Singapore
`
`..
`
`.
`
`......~.....,._.,__,__..
`
`.
`
`.
`
`
`
`FORD 1381 mum ,...,mw -..~=«
`
`..
`
`.
`
`.
`
`1 of 5
`
`FORD 1381
`
`

`
`
`
`_,,.,‘,,.,_,._,___,“__._/
`
`Copyright ((3) I986 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
`
`All rights reserved. Published simultaneously in Canada.
`
`Reproduction or translation of any part of this work beyond that permitted by Sections 107 and I08
`of the 1976 United States Copyright Act without the permission of the copyright owner is unlawful.
`Requests for permission or further inl'orm-ation should be addressed to the Permissions Department,
`John Wiley & Sons.
`
`Library of Congress CataI0ging-in-Publication Dam
`
`.,,..
`
`
`
`
`Palm, William J. (William John), 1944-
`Control systems engineering.
`
`Bibliography: p.
`Includes index.
`
`1. Automatic control.
`I. Title
`TJ213.P225 I986
`629.8
`ISBN 0-471-81086-X
`
`2. Control theory.
`85-26590
`
`Printed in the United States of America
`10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 l
`
`V
`“
`
`2 of 5
`
`FORD 1381
`
`

`
`
`
`""ev'"atic
`
`pressure
`
`Diaphragm
`
`Flow '—>
`
`3 —>
`
`FIGURE 6.25 Pneumatic flow control
`V3'V¢-
`
`6.5 CONTROL LAWS
`
`335
`
`can be used to drive a final control element
`
`like the pneumatic actuating valve shown
`in Figure 6.25. The pneumatic pressure
`acts on the upper side of the diaphragm
`and is opposed by the return spring.
`The nozzle flapper is a force distance
`type of actuator, because its input
`is a
`displacement and its output a force (pres-
`sure). The other type of pneumatic actuator
`is the force balance type, in which both the
`input and output are pressures. The pres-
`sures are made to act across diaphragms
`whose resulting motion activates a pneu-
`matic relay. Details can be found in the
`specialized literature (e.g., Reference 7).
`
`6.5 CONTROL LAWS
`
`The control logic elements are designed to act on the actuating (error) signal to
`produce the control signal. The algorithm that is physically implemented for this
`purpose is the control law or control action. A non zero error signal results from either
`a change in command or a disturbance. The general function of the controller is to
`keep the controlled variable near its desired value when these occur. More specifically,
`the control objectives might be stated as follows:
`
`1. Minimize the steady—state error.
`
`2. Minimize the settling time.
`
`3. Achieve other
`overshoot.
`
`transient
`
`specifications,
`
`such as minimizing the maximum
`
`In practice, the design specifications for a controller are more detailed. For example,
`the bandwidth might also be specified along with a safety margin for stability. We
`never know the numerical values of the system's parameters with true certainty, and
`some controller designs can be more sensitive to such parameter uncertainties than
`other designs. So a parameter sensitivity specification might also be included. We will
`return to this topic later, but for now, a general understanding of control objectives is
`sufiieient for our purpose.
`The following two control laws form the basis of many control systems.
`
`Two-Position Control
`
`Two-position control is the most familiar type perhaps because of its use in home
`thermostats. The control output
`takes on one of two values. With the on~ojf
`controller, the controller output is either on or oiT(fully open or fully closed). Such is
`the case with the thermostat furnace system. The controller output is determined by
`
`FORD 1381
`
`->-
`
`Kb,
`
`Flapper
`
`d.':*:‘::::‘.:"‘
`
`(inches)
`
`:Ieristic curve.
`
`‘the. back pressure curve.
`dlsplacement from the
`amal condition. Then the
`
`(6.4-10)
`
`rr. From the geometry of
`
`(6.4- I l)
`
`(6.4-12)
`
`the nozzle
`‘W38 TCgi0n.
`ware is well below the
`{more output pressure is
`mric relay or amplifier
`titre 6.24 illustrates this
`
`traick pressure increases,
`{the supply line, and the
`approaches atmospheric
`rack pressure decreases,
`fthe atmospheric bleed,
`ressure approaches the
`The relay is said to be
`ause an increase in back
`
`i a decrease in output.
`Iressure from the relay
`
`3of5
`
`3 of 5
`
`FORD 1381
`
`

`
` V:
`
`the suitability of on—offcon¥tti
`obviously be unsuitable. E
`capacitance is greater.
`Another type of two-pm
`ing diagram is shown in Fig
`control by the fact that the (ii
`A motor with constant ton
`
`bang—bang device. Because
`model would include a dead
`the controller output is zero
`
`Proportional Control
`
`Two-position control is aecc
`are not too severe. In the hon
`
`hardly detectable by the occ
`situations require finer conu
`Consider the tank systt
`controller, we might try setti:
`balances the system at the dl
`this setting in proportion to
`proportional control,
`the alt
`proportional to the error. R-
`are drawn in tertns of the
`
`Applying this convention t
`proportional control is desc:
`
`where F (s) is the deviation in
`total valve displacement is _\
`
`(0)
`
`FIGURE 6.28 Transfer chart:
`a dead zone. The control signal
`
`'1
`
`FIGURE 6.27
`
`(a) Liquid level control with on—olf action. (b) Time response.
`
`
`
`336
`
`FEEDBACK CONTROL SYSTEMS
`
`f
`
`Neutral zone
`
`,.
`
`FIGURE 6.26 Transfer characteristics
`
`of the on—olf controller. The actuating
`error
`is e=r-c, where r=set point.
`c=controlled variable, and f: control
`signal.
`
`the magnitude of the error signal. The
`switching diagram for the on—oFf con-
`troller with hysteresis is shown in Figure
`6.26.
`
`An example of an application of an
`on~olTeontroller to a liquid level system is
`shown in Figure 6.27a. The time response
`shown in Figure 6.27}: with a solid line is
`for an ideal system in which the control
`valve acts instantaneously. The controlled
`variable cycles with an amplitude that
`depends on the width of the neutral zone
`or gap. This zone is provided to prevent
`frequent on roll" switching, or chattering,
`which can shorten the life of the device.
`
`The cycling frequency also depends on the time constant of the controlled process and
`the magnitude of the control signal.
`the sensor and control valve will not
`In a real system, as opposed to ideal,
`respond instantaneously, but have their own time constants. The valve will not close
`at the instant the height reaches the desired level. There will be some delay during
`which flow continues into the tank. The result
`is shown by the dotted line in
`Figure 6.27b. The opposite occurs when the valve is turned on. This unwanted elleet
`can be reduced by decreasing the neutral zone. but the cycling frequency increases if
`this is done.
`
`The overshoot and undershoot in on—otTcontrol will be acceptable only when the
`time constant of the process is large compared to the time lag of the control elements.
`This lag is related to the time constants of the elements as well as to their distance
`from the plant. If the control valve in Figure 6.27a is far upstream from the tank, a
`significant lag can exist between the time of control action and its ellect on the plant.
`Another source oftimc lag is the capacitance ofthe controller itself. For example, if the
`heater capacitance in the temperature controller of Section 6.2 is appreciable, the
`heater will continue to deliver energy to the oven even after it has been turned ofi”.
`An example close to home demonstrates how the capacitance of the plant allects
`
`R a]
`
`Overshoot
`
`beh:vior / Ideal
`
`\~—-7I———
`E mmying‘ \ 1 Undorshoot
`CUYVG
`
`/Filling
`I curve
`
`(b)
`
`time
`
`
`
`
`
`Solenoid
`
`S“°°"'
`
`wet
`
`4 of 5
`
`FORD 1381
`
`

`
`
`
`6.5 CONTROL LAWS
`
`337
`
`the suitability of on—ofl' control. ()n—ofi‘ control of the hot water valve in a shower will
`obviously be unsuitable. but
`it
`is acceptable for a bath, because the thermal
`capacitance is greater.
`Another type of two-position control is the bang—b(mg controller whose switch-
`ing diagram is shown in Figure 6.28a. This controller is distinguished from on—oiT
`control by the fact that the direction or sign of the control signal can have two values.
`A inoior with constant
`torque that can reverse quickly might be modeled as a
`bang~bang device. Because such perfect switching is impossible. a more accurate
`model would include a dead zone (Figure 6.281)). When the error is within the Zone,
`the controller output is zero.
`
`Proportional Control
`Two-position control is acceptable for many applications in which the requirements
`are not too severe. In the home heating application, the typical 2"F temperature gap is
`hardly detectable by the occupants. Thus. the system is acceptable. However, many
`situations require liner control.
`Consider the tank system shown in Figure 6.2711. To replace the two-position
`controller, we might try setting the control valve manually to achieve a flow rate that
`balances the system at the desired level. We might then add a controller that adjusts
`this setting in proportion to the deviation of the level from the desired value. This is
`proportional mritrol.
`the algorithm in which the change in the control signal
`is
`proportional to the error. Recall the convention that block diagrams for controllers
`are drawn in terms of the deviations from a zero-error equilibrium condition.
`Applying this convention to the general
`terminology in Figure 6.7, we see that
`proportional control is described by
`Fts) = K,,E(s)
`
`(6-5-I)
`
`where F(s) is the deviation in the control signal and K’, is the proportional gain. lf the
`total valve displacement is _\'(t) and the manually created displacement is x, then
`
`ytt) -— Kpettl + .\'
`
`ie of the error signal. The
`igram for
`the on—olT con-
`Ystcresis is shown in Figure
`
`‘Pie of an application of an
`ller to a liquid level system is
`ire 6.27a. The time response
`ire 6.27b with a solid line is
`ystem in which the control
`mtaneously. The controlled
`-8 with an amplitude that
`e width of the neutral zone
`one is provided to prevent
`H Swltchlflg, Or chattering,
`irten the life of the device_
`the controlled process and
`
`nd control valve will not
`IS._ The valve will not close
`Will be some delay during
`"" by the dotted line in
`Ion. This unwanted effect
`["18 frequency increases if
`
`’“°°¢Ptable only when the
`Ig of the control elements,
`: well as to their distance
`pstream from the tank, a
`Ind its eliect on the plant,
`r itself. For example, ifthe
`'n.6.2 is appreciable, the
`it has been turned oil".
`ltance of the plant affects
`
`Overshooi
`
`
`
`.\:‘7’-~-
`Kvmg \/ Undershoot
`We
`
`I
`
`
`time
`
`it
`
`e response.
`
`5 of 5
`
`lal
`
`(bl
`
`FIGURE 6.28 Transfer characteristics. (a) [deal bang-bang control. (b) Bang-bang control with
`a dead zone. The control signal is f; the error signal is 0.
`
`FORD 1381
`
`5 of 5
`
`FORD 1381

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket