`
`
`
`Case No: IPR2015-00784
`
`Attorney Docket No. FPGP0104IPR9
`
`Ground 2. CLAIMS 6-11 ARE OBVIOUS OVER U.S. PATENT NO.
`5,789,882 IN VIEW OF U.S. PATENT NO. 6,116,363 AND
`THE KNOWLEDGE OF A PERSON HAVING ORDINARY
`SKILL IN THE ART ................................................................................. 152
`
`A. Dependent Claim 6 ..................................................................................... 152
`B.
`Dependent Claim 7 ..................................................................................... 169
`C. Dependent Claim 8 ..................................................................................... 170
`D. Dependent Claim 9 ..................................................................................... 175
`E. Dependent Claim 10 ................................................................................... 176
`F.
`Dependent Claim 11 ................................................................................... 178
`
`Ground 3. CLAIM 23 IS OBVIOUS OVER U.S. PATENT NO. 5,789,882
`IN VIEW OF THE TEACHINGS IN JURGEN AND
`LATEUR IN FURTHER VIEWOF THE KNOWLEDGE A
`PERSON HAVING ORDINARY SKILL IN THE ART ................... 180
`
`A. Dependent Claim 23 ................................................................................... 180
`1.
`Reason to Combine ......................................................................... 181
`2.
`Analysis ............................................................................................. 183
`
`VII. TORQUE-BASED CONTROL WAS WELL-KNOWN ............................... 190
`
`A.
`B.
`
`The Durham Project/Bumby papers ........................................................ 191
`Severinsky ’970............................................................................................. 192
`
`VIII. CONCLUSION ...................................................................................................... 196
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Page 3 of 197
`
`
`
`FORD 1556
`
`