throbber
Date Last Modified:
`Prepared by:
`
`
`5-June-06
`David Bontrager
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Trey Project
`
`Testing Procedure
`
`Sauder Exhibit 2051
`JSquared Inc. v Sauder Manufacturing Co.
`IPR2015-00774
`
`

`
`Table of Contents
`Scope . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
`1)
`Testing Process for Trey Assembly . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
`2)
`2.1)
`Backrest Strength Test (static) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
`2.2)
`Drop Test (dynamic) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
`2.3)
`Swivel Test (cyclic) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
`2.4)
`Tilt Mechanism Test (cyclic) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
`2.5)
`Seating Durability Tests (cyclic) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
`2.6)
`Stability Tests . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
`2.7)
`Backrest Durability Test (cyclic) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
`2.8)
`Caster/Chair Base Durability test (cyclic) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
`2.9)
`Chair Glide Strength Test (dynamic) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
`2.10) Latch Durability Test (cyclic) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
`2.11) Latch Impact Tests (dynamic) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
`2.12) Latch Strength Test (static) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
`2.13) Random Impact Test (dynamic) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
`2.14) Flammability Test . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
`Testing Process for Seat Component . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
`3.1)
`Drop Test (dynamic) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
`3.2)
`Seating Durability Tests (cyclic) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
`3.3)
`Random Impact Test (dynamic) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
`3.4)
`Spreading Strength Test (static) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
`3.5)
`Lateral Strength Test (static) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
`3.6)
`Backrest Impact Test (dynamic) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
`Testing Process for Base Component . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
`4.1)
`Random Impact Test (dynamic) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
`4.2)
`Base Test (static) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
`
`
`3)
`
`4)
`
`
`
`2
`
`Sauder Exhibit 2051
`JSquared Inc. v Sauder Manufacturing Co.
`IPR2015-00774
`
`

`
`Scope
`
`1
`
`This testing procedure is intended to thoroughly test the Trey Project chair in order
`to verify that it will be able to withstand all reasonable abuse that it could be dealt
`during its lifetime. Abuse beyond that which is expected in the intended market is not
`necessarily taken into account or tested for.
`
`Testing Process for Trey Assembly
`
` 2
`
`
`
`
`When assembled, the Trey chair is classified as a Type I tilting chair, as defined in
`ANSI/BIFMA X5.1-2002. In some of the tests, the extent of the testing is increased
`to push towards the point of failure. Any necessary test modifications will be listed
`where applicable. Term definitions follow the convention used in ANSI/BIFMA X5.1-
`2002.
`
`(static)
`2.1 Backrest Strength Test
`The purpose of this test is to evaluate the ability of the chair to withstand stresses
`such as those caused by the user exerting a rearward force on the backrest of the
`chair.
`
`The testing procedure will follow the ANSI/BIFMA X5.1-2002 standards outlined in
`Section 5 (p. 18). There will be a variation in the extent of the testing. After the proof
`load test is performed (Section 5.4.2), the load force will be increased until a sudden
`or major change in the structural integrity of the chair occurs.
`
`(dynamic)
`
`2.2 Drop Test
`The purpose of this test is to evaluate the ability of the chair to withstand heavy and
`abusive impact forces on the seat.
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`Sauder Exhibit 2051
`JSquared Inc. v Sauder Manufacturing Co.
`IPR2015-00774
`
`

`
`The testing procedure will follow the ANSI/BIFMA X5.1-2002 standards outlined in
`Section 8 (pp. 29 – 31). There will be a variation in the extent of the testing. After the
`functional load (Section 8.4.1) and proof load (Section 8.4.2) tests are performed,
`the drop height of the test bag – using the proof load weight – will be increased by 3
`in. increments until either the height reaches 305 mm (12 in.) or a sudden or major
`change in the structural integrity of the chair occurs, whichever comes first.
`
`(cyclic)
`2.3 Swivel Test
`The purpose of this test is to evaluate the ability of the chair to withstand stresses
`and wear of repeated swiveling.
`
`The testing procedure will follow the ANSI/BIFMA X5.1-2002 standards outlined in
`Section 9 (p. 33).
`
`(cyclic)
`
`Tilt Mechanism Test
`2.4
`The purpose of this test is to evaluate the ability of the tilt mechanism to withstand
`fatigue stresses and wear caused by repeated tilting.
`
`The testing procedure will follow the ANSI/BIFMA X5.1-2002 standards outlined in
`Section 10 (p. 35).
`
`(cyclic)
`2.5 Seating Durability Tests
`The purpose of these tests is to evaluate the ability of the chair to withstand fatigue
`stresses and wear caused by downward vertical force(s) on the seat.
`
`The testing procedure will follow the ANSI/BIFMA X5.1-2002 standards outlined in
`Section 11 (pp. 37 – 39).
`
`2.6 Stability Tests
`The purpose of these tests is to evaluate the front and rear stability of the chair.
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`Sauder Exhibit 2051
`JSquared Inc. v Sauder Manufacturing Co.
`IPR2015-00774
`
`

`
`The testing procedure will follow the ANSI/BIFMA X5.1-2002 standards outlined in
`Section 12 (pp. 41 – 45). This test is to be performed on only a chair with casters.
`
`(cyclic)
`2.7 Backrest Durability Test
`The purpose of this test is to evaluate the ability of the chair to withstand fatigue
`stresses and wear caused by a rearward force on the backrest of the chair.
`
`The testing procedure will follow the ANSI/BIFMA X5.1-2002 standards outlined in
`Section 15 (pp. 53 – 57).
`
`(cyclic)
`
`2.8 Caster/Chair Base Durability Test
`The purpose of this test is to evaluate the ability of the chair base and casters to
`withstand fatigue stresses and wear caused by moving the chair back and forth.
`
`The testing procedure will follow the ANSI/BIFMA X5.1-2002 standards outlined in
`Section 17 (p. 67).
`
`(dynamic)
`
`2.9 Chair Glide Strength Test
`The purpose of this test is to evaluate the ability of the chair glides to withstand
`impact forces such as those experienced upon contact with a fixed object while the
`chair is being slid across the floor.
`2.9.1 Test Procedure
`This test is to be performed only on a chair with glides. The chair will be
`attached to a machine such as that used in Section 2.8. If the seat portion of
`the chair is not attached to the base, then weights equivalent to the weight of
`the seat portion will be put on the base.
`
`The base is to be run over an obstacle such as those used in Section 2.8 at a
`speed of 1.0 m/s (3.3 ft/s) over a long enough distance that at least one of the
`glides contacts the obstacle. There should be no loss of serviceability.
`
`
`
`
`5
`
`Sauder Exhibit 2051
`JSquared Inc. v Sauder Manufacturing Co.
`IPR2015-00774
`
`

`
`(cyclic)
`
`2.10 Latch Durability Test
`The purpose of this test is to evaluate the ability of the chair latch to withstand
`fatigue stresses and wear caused by the repeated use of the pedestal latch.
`2.10.1 Test Procedure
`The chair or chair base will be fixed in the manner shown in ANSI/BIFMA
`X5.1-2002 Figure 5e (p. 17). Some mechanism will depress the latch,
`followed by the removal of the seat from the latch end of the pedestal table.
`Next, the latch will be released, and the seat will be pushed back onto the
`pedestal until the latch has fully engaged.
`
`
`The procedure is to be repeated for 10,000 cycles at the rate of 5 to 10 cycles per
`minute.
`
`There will be no loss of serviceability.
`
`(dynamic)
`
`2.11 Latch Impact Tests
`The purpose of these tests is to evaluate the ability of the chair to withstand impact
`forces in a direction that puts stress on the latch structure.
`
`2.11.1 Test Procedure
`The chair shall be fastened as in ANSI/BIFMA X5.1-2002 Figure 5e (p. 17).
`
` A
`
` sandbag will be swung in to strike the seat portion of the chair directly from
`the side. Repeat the procedure, rotating the chair so as to strike the front
`edge of the seat and the center of the back of the chair frame as well.
`
`The sandbag will be released a straight-line distance of 305 mm (12 in.) from
`the edge of the chair, and will be positioned in such a way that the pivot point
`is 610 mm (24 in.) directly above the edge of the chair being struck. The
`sandbag will weigh 23 kg (50 lb.). There will be no loss of serviceability.
`
`
`
`
`6
`
`Sauder Exhibit 2051
`JSquared Inc. v Sauder Manufacturing Co.
`IPR2015-00774
`
`

`
`(static)
`
`2.12 Latch Strength Test
`The purpose of these tests is to evaluate the ability of the latch to withstand static
`forces in a direction that puts stress on the latch structure.
`2.12.1 Test Procedure
`The chair is to be laid on its side on the testing surface, with the height
`adjustment cylinder extended fully.
`
` A
`
` load will be placed on the spindle of the base at a distance of 150 mm (6
`in.) from the bottom of the table that latches into the chair. It will remain there
`for 1 minute before removal.
`2.12.2 Functional Load
`The weight will have a magnitude of 102 kg (225 lb.). There will be no loss of
`serviceability.
`2.12.3 Proof Load
`The weight will have a magnitude of 136 kg (300 lb.). There will be no sudden
`or major change in the structural integrity of the chair.
`
`
`(dynamic)
`
`2.13 Random Impact Test
`The purpose of this test is to evaluate the ability of the chair to withstand impacts
`such as those experienced when the chair collides with fixed surfaces.
`2.13.1 Test Procedure
`The chair is to be dropped and allowed to freefall to the testing surface. This
`is to be repeated several times, each time dropping in such a way that it lands
`on different parts of the chair. High levels of approximation are acceptable in
`the height measurements.
`2.13.2 Functional Load
`In the functional load test, the chair shall be dropped from a height of
`approximately 0.9 m (3 ft.), as measured to the approximated center of mass
`of the chair. There will be no loss of serviceability.
`2.13.3 Proof Load
`
`
`
`7
`
`Sauder Exhibit 2051
`JSquared Inc. v Sauder Manufacturing Co.
`IPR2015-00774
`
`

`
`The proof load height is 1.5 m (5 ft.), as measured to the approximated center
`of mass of the chair. There will be no sudden or major change in the
`structural integrity of the chair. Loss of serviceability is acceptable.
`
`
`2.14 Flammability Test
`The purpose of this test is to evaluate the compliance of the chair with
`flammability standards.
`
`The test will follow the procedure outlined in Technical Bulletin 133 released
`by the State of California Department of Consumer Affairs Bureau of Home
`Furnishings and Thermal Insulation.
`
`Testing Process for Seat Component
`
` 3
`
`
`
`
`As a separate unit, the seat component of the Trey assembly has no distinct
`classification. Some of the tests are repeated from Section 2 due to the presence of
`different weight-bearing structures.
`
`
`3.1 Drop Test
`Repeat Section 2.2.
`
`3.2 Seating Durability Test
`Repeat Section 2.5.
`
`3.3 Random Impact Test
`Repeat Section 2.13.
`
`(static)
`3.4 Spreading Strength Test
`The purpose of this test is to evaluate the ability of the chair seat to withstand forces
`that spread the seat bottom and backrest apart.
`
`(cyclic)
`
`(dynamic)
`
`(dynamic)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`8
`
`Sauder Exhibit 2051
`JSquared Inc. v Sauder Manufacturing Co.
`IPR2015-00774
`
`

`
`3.4.1 Test Procedure
`The seat is to be placed upside-down on the testing surface, that is, the top of
`the backrest and the front of the seat bottom should be resting on the testing
`surface.
`
` A
`
` force will be applied on top of the corner of the seat, that is, on the outside
`of the bend, centered side to side. It will remain there for 1 minute before
`removal.
`3.4.2 Functional Load
`The functional load will be 102 kg (225 lb.). There will be no loss of
`serviceability.
`3.4.3 Test to Failure
`The force will be increased until a sudden or major change in the structural
`integrity or the chair occurs.
`
`
`(static)
`
`Lateral Strength Test
`3.5
`The purpose of this test is to evaluate the ability of the chair seat to withstand
`opposing inward forces from the sides.
`3.5.1 Test Procedure
`The chair seat is to be placed on its side on the testing surface, fixed in such
`a way that it cannot tip over.
`
` A
`
` sandbag such as that used in Section 2.2 will be placed on the edge of the
`seat bottom, centered front to back, with some weight on the seat cushion
`and some on the runner. It will remain there for 1 minute before removal.
`Repeat the procedure with the sandbag placed (centered) on the edge of the
`backrest.
`3.5.2 Functional Load
`The functional load is 102 kg (225 lb.). There will be no loss of serviceability.
`3.5.3 Proof Load
`
`
`
`9
`
`Sauder Exhibit 2051
`JSquared Inc. v Sauder Manufacturing Co.
`IPR2015-00774
`
`

`
`The proof load is 136 kg (300 lb.). There will be no sudden or major change in
`the structural integrity of the chair.
`
`
`(dynamic)
`
`3.6 Backrest Impact Test
`The chair seat will be fixed in such a way that the back of the backrest is
`facing up, with the seat rigid, and the back rest is not supported from
`underneath. It makes no difference if the base component is attached or not.
`
` A
`
` hard rubber ball with a diameter of 2 in. will be dropped onto the center of
`the backrest surface.
`3.6.1 Functional Load
`The ball shall be dropped from a height of 610 mm (2 ft). There should be no
`loss of serviceability.
`3.6.2 Proof Load
`The ball shall be dropped from a height of 914 mm (3 ft). Loss of serviceability
`is acceptable.
`
`Testing Process for Base Component
`
` 4
`
`
`
`
`
`(dynamic)
`
`
`4.1 Random Impact Test
`Repeat Section 2.13.
`
`(static)
`
`4.2 Base Test
`The purpose of this test is to evaluate the ability of the pedestal base to withstand
`excessive vertical forces.
`
`The testing procedure will follow the ANSI/BIFMA X5.1-2002 standards outlined in
`Section 7 (p. 27).
`
`
`
`10
`
`Sauder Exhibit 2051
`JSquared Inc. v Sauder Manufacturing Co.
`IPR2015-00774

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket