`571-272-7822
`
`
`
`
` Paper 11
`Entered: August 12, 2015
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`_______________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`_______________
`
`SONY CORPORATION, SONY CORPORATION OF AMERICA,
`SONY ELECTRONICS, INC., SONY MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS
`(USA) INC., SONY MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS AB, and
`SONY MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS INC.,
`Petitioners,
`
`v.
`
`INNOVATIVE DISPLAY TECHNOLOGIES LLC,
`Patent Owner.
`_______________
`
`Case IPR2015-00745
`Case IPR2015-00749
`Case IPR2015-00752
`Case IPR2015-00753
`Case IPR2015-00755
`Case IPR2015-00756
`Case IPR2015-00757
`________
`
`Before LORA M. GREEN, THOMAS L. GIANNETTI,
`MIRIAM L. QUINN, BEVERLY M. BUNTING, and MICHELLE M.
`WORMMEESTER, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`GIANNETTI, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`JUDGMENT
`Termination of Proceedings
`37 C.F.R. § 42.72
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IPR2015-00745
`IPR2015-00749
`IPR2015-00752
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` IPR2015-00753
`IPR2015-00755
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IPR2015-00756
`IPR2015-00757
`
`
`
`On August 11, 2015, the parties filed a joint motion to terminate each
`
`of these proceedings pursuant to a settlement agreement. Paper 10.1 The
`
`parties also filed true copies of their written settlement agreement, made in
`
`connection with the termination of these proceedings, in accordance with 35
`
`U.S.C. § 317(b) and 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(b). Exhibit 1029. Additionally, the
`
`parties submitted joint requests to have their settlement agreement treated as
`
`confidential business information under 35 U.S.C. § 317(b) and 37 C.F.R.
`
`§ 42.74(c). Paper 11.
`
`These proceedings are in the preliminary stages. No trial proceedings
`
`are instituted. No depositions have been taken. Paper 10, 1. The parties
`
`submit that termination is appropriate because the parties have settled their
`
`dispute and have reached agreement to terminate all of these IPRs. Paper
`
`10, 1–2. The parties represent that the settlement agreement ends all patent
`
`disputes between the parties including their pending district court litigation,
`
`where a notice of settlement has been filed. Paper 10, 3.
`
`Upon consideration of the requests before us, we determine that
`
`terminating these proceedings with respect to both Petitioners and Patent
`
`Owner, at this early juncture, promotes efficiency and minimizes
`
`unnecessary costs. Based on the facts of these cases, it is appropriate to
`
`enter judgment terminating the proceedings without rendering a final written
`
`decision. See 35 U.S.C. § 317(a); 37 C.F.R. § 42.72.
`
`
`1 Paper and exhibit numbers refer to Case IPR2015-00745. Corresponding
`motions and settlement agreements were filed in each of the other cases.
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`IPR2015-00745
`IPR2015-00749
`IPR2015-00752
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` IPR2015-00753
`IPR2015-00755
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Accordingly, it is:
`
`IPR2015-00756
`IPR2015-00757
`
`
`
`
`
`ORDERED that the joint motions to terminate the following cases are
`
`granted: Case IPR2015-00745; Case IPR2015-00749; Case IPR2015-00752;
`
`Case IPR2015-00753; Case IPR2015-00755; Case IPR2015-00756; and
`
`Case IPR2015-00757.
`
`
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that the above cases are hereby terminated as
`
`to all parties, including Petitioners and Patent Owner; and
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that the parties’ joint requests that the
`
`settlement agreement be treated as business confidential information, kept
`
`separate from the patent file, and made available only to Federal
`
`Government agencies on written request, or to any person on a showing of
`
`good cause, pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 317(b) and 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(c), are
`
`granted.
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`
`
` IPR2015-00753
`IPR2015-00755
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IPR2015-00756
`IPR2015-00757
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IPR2015-00745
`IPR2015-00749
`IPR2015-00752
`
`
`
`
`PETITIONER:
`
`Gregory Gewirtz
`ggewirtz.ipr@ldlkm.com
`
`Scott McKeown
`cpdocketmckeown@oblon.com
`
`Jonathan David
`jdavid.ipr@ldlkm.com
`
`Robert Hander
`rhander.ipr@ldlkm.com
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`
`Justin Kimble
`JKimble-IPR@bcpc-law.com
`
`
`
`4
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
