throbber
JOURNAL OF MICROEIECTROMECHANICAI. SYSTEMS. VOL. 5. N0. 1. MARCH I996
`
`45
`
`Fabrication of a Mechanical Antireflection
`
`Switch for Fiber-to-the-Home Systems
`James A. Walker. Keith W. Goossen. and Susanne C. Amey
`
`Abstract—We present the methods used to fabricate a microme-
`chanlcal silicon optical modulator for use in a fiber-to-the-home
`applications. We emphasize the efforts made to realize a practical,
`robust, manufactnrable. and easily packaged device. In addition,
`recent speed, temperature stability, and reliability results are
`presented. Rise and fall
`times of 132 and 125 its, respectively,
`have been observed in response to a square wave drive signal.
`The device has been temperature cycled from ~50“: to 90"C
`and shown greater than Ill-dB optical contrast ratio over this
`temperature range. Finally, the device has been cycled al 500 kHz
`for a period of nearly twu months [two—trillion cycles) without a
`noticeable loss in performance. [134]
`
`Outta] Nathan Unit
`
`
`
`Fig. i. Representation ol‘ Rl‘I'E—nct architecture [2].
`
`I.
`
`[N'rnooucnort
`
`HERE has been much recent emphasis on providing
`the world with an information super highway.
`[1
`is
`believed by many that
`this will consist of a backbone of
`fiber optics that
`IWill extend throughout the network, all the
`way to the subscriber location or home. Recent work in the
`fiber-optics community has focused on providing a fiber—to—
`the-home {FITHJ system. which can provide the bandwidth
`required to enable the high-performance services promised by
`proponents of the information superhighway. In some system
`configurations, an optical modulator is used at the Subscriber
`interface to imprint outgoing information on an incoming
`signal and reroute it onto a fiber back to the central office
`[i]. [2]. Some advantages of using an optical modulator for
`this purpose are the maintenance of wavelength coherence
`of the signal. reliability of the optical device.
`temperature
`insensitivity. and. most notably, cost We present here an
`optical modulator based on microelectromechanical systems
`(MEMS) principles that incorporates a moving dielectric film
`to provide optical modulation. We call this device a mechanical
`antircfiection Switch (MARS) device [3]. Attributes of the
`MARS device include high speed. high contrast compared
`to other surface normal modulators, temperature insensitiVity.
`polarization independence (due to its surface normal nature),
`and low cost.
`In [3], we presented a device that illustrated
`the modulator principles. but was fabricated without emphasis
`on reliability or yield. Here we present fabrication sequences
`that result in practical. robust devices and demonstrate high
`reliability.
`
`revised December 2|. 1995.
`Manuscript received December 22. 1994:
`Subject Editor. K. Petersen.
`l. A. Walker and K. W. Goosscn are with AT&T Bell Laboratories.
`Hoimdel. NJ 07‘333 USA.
`S. C. Army is with AT&T Bell Laboratories. Murray Hill. NJ USA.
`i’ublishcr Item identifier 5 1M1—7i57l96102082—3.
`
`A. Fr'ber—to-rhe-Home systems
`
`The F'I'TH systems under consideration here are packet-
`switched data networks. In this type of system. information is
`divided into discrete blocks of information of 48 bytes. called
`packets. These packets are sent serially through the network
`and received at their destination. where they are reconstructed
`into the complete information stream. A schematic represen—
`tation of one such network. called RlTlinet I2]. is shown in
`Fig.
`l.
`to RITE—Net. each packet traveling from the central office
`consists of a front half. which contains the downstream in
`formation going to the subscriber. The second half of the
`packet consists of a steady stream of light. Many channels
`of information are contained in the signal leaving the central
`office (C0) by means of wavelength division multiplexing. At
`the remote nodc. these multiple wavelengths are separated by
`means of a passive element known as a Dragonc router [4].
`and each wavelengdi then travels separately to its intended
`optical network unit (GNU). The GNU could be an individual
`subscriber node (home) or a group of up to four. Al
`the
`GNU, the packet travels through a fiber splitter. sending the
`downstream signal
`to a receiver and simultaneously sending
`Ihe Packet to an optical modulator. The modulator blanks out
`the first half of the packet {although this is not required) and
`imprints the upstream data on the CW light
`in the second
`half of the packet. This data then travels back to the remote
`node where the Dragonc router multiplexes it with the other
`wavelengths and they are sent back to the central office
`again. Since there are relatively few central offices compared
`to the ONU‘s.
`it
`is possible to use high-performance {i.e.,
`expensive) transmitters and receivers in the CO‘s. However.
`to provide the same level of componenl at every 0N U would
`be prohibitively expensive, so it
`is therefore necessary to
`provide an inexpensive alternative able to provide Ihe most
`basic service. Bandwidth requirements for several levels of
`services are shown in Table l.
`
`l05?—?l$7i’96505.00 © 1996 lBEL
`
`JDS UNIPHASE CORPORATION
`JDS UNIPHASE CORPORATION
`Exhibit 1030, Page 1
`Exhibit 1030, Page 1
`
`

`

`
`
`4-6
`
`JOURNAL OF MICROELECI'RDMECHANLCAL SYSTEMS. VOL. 5. NO. 1, MARCH 1996
`
`TABLE I
`BANDWDJTH Rttotunmtwr‘s unit Vantoos LEVI-LS HF TELEPHONY SERVICES
`
`
`Service Bandwidth Rgnlrements
`
`
`Standard tel
`
`no service (D50
`
`Video conference service so D505!
`
`64 kBitfs
`
`3S4 ltBitt‘s
`
`Compressed video transmission
`
`1 5-4.5 NEWS
`
`Local area Demeter networks (LANE!
`
`UncomEcssed video transmission
`
`10 Will;
`
`[00 MBitfs
`
`
`
`1600
`
`1-100
`
`1500
`
`A great many consumers will only be initially interested in
`maintaining the type of telephone service presently available.
`which requires only 64 kBitst's bandwidth. Although it
`is
`necessary to upgrade the network to provide higher-level
`services. every customer cannot be charged to pay for that
`upgrade if they are not utilizing Lhe higher bandwidth. The
`subscriber who wishes higher bandwidth services will be
`willing to pay a surcharge to obtain higher-perforrnanee~level
`components. Volumes in the United States for the general
`service units are estimated to be roughly IOU million, given
`the present number of subscribers to the telephone network.
`A five-year deployment would therefore entail fabricating and
`installing roughly 100000 units per day over the five years.
`Again.
`this underscores the need for a cost effective and
`reliable solution. We are proposing as one possible solution
`the modulator described here.
`
`11. MECHANICAL ANTtREFtECHON
`SWITCH (MARS) Device
`The MARS device is a surface-normal modulation device
`
`based on a moving antireflectjon film as described below.
`Examples of other devices based on vertically moving me-
`chanical films can be found in literature. such as vertically
`moving gratings [5]. moving metallic reflectors l6], and vari—
`able air-gap I-‘abry-Porot structures [7L For a fiber—to—lho-honte
`application it
`is necessary that
`the modulator have wide
`fabrication tolerance. high speed. wide optical spectrum. and
`low total packaged cost. Although the TI digital micromirror
`device can form a very good display element. it is unlikely to
`achieve the Mbb’s response times required here. By the very
`nature of their modulation mechanisms, the deformable light
`valve and variable Fabry-Perot device suffer from a narrow
`optical spectrum and high fabrication complexity. which leads
`to high fabrication cost. As will be described here. the MARS
`device can satisfy all of the above operating requirements as
`well its promise very low fabrication cost.
`The operating principle of the MARS device is fairly simple.
`The device is based on optical interference effects between a
`dielectric film suspended above a substrate and the substrate.
`Optical amireflcction films are widely used in the optics field.
`An antitefieetion film is formed by a dielectric film of a
`
`wavelength (rim)
`
`Fig. 2. Modeled optical spectrum for a suspended l950—A-Ihick film of
`silicon nitride.
`
`thickness equal to lf4 wavelength (A) of the incident light and
`with a refractive index equal to the square root of that of the
`substrate. If this film is instead suspended above the substrate
`by an air gap of M4. it then becomes a nearly perfect reflector.
`More generally. if the air gap is of thickness 12—3. there exists
`an antirehection state for m oven. and for in odd there is a
`reflecting state. Therefore. the reflectivity state of a device can
`be changed from reflecting to nonreflecu’ng by a change in air
`gap of M4. For the most basic MARS device. we create a
`silicon nitride membrane suspended above a silicon substrate
`by A14 using surface micromachining techniques. The nitride
`film is then clectrostaiically attracted toward die subsnate
`creating a M4 antircflection condition upon contact. The
`in. = 1 case is the most fundamental and provides the largest
`optical spectrum. as shown in Fig. 2. However, as mentioned
`earlier, any structure that has an initial air gap of thickness ”“7"
`where m is odd would have similar operating characteristics
`at a given wavelength. Due to the nature of the intended
`application. one of our goals is to strive for a wide optical
`spectrum with contrast ratio greater than 10 : l. A model of the
`optical spectrum for a suspended film of l950~A—thick silicon
`nitride with a refractive index of LS? is shown in Fig. 2.
`One can see that for the M4 case. contrast ratios in excess
`of 25:] are possible for wavelengths ranging from below
`1300 nm to greater than 1600 nm. This broad spectral width
`makes this device useful at both typical operating wavelengths
`used in fiber—optics communications systems—1320 and 1560
`nm. For the case where m is increased to three,
`the optical
`bandwidth is considerably narrower. The contrast ratio at a
`given center wavelength. however. would still be very high.
`The basic operation of the MARS device is illustrated in
`Fig. 3.
`Our modeling indicates dial the deflection over the optical
`window is within 5% of the design value. Plane wave modeling
`shows that
`the contrast at
`the center wavelength remains
`greater than 180:1. Since our actual contrast
`is less than
`this (20: I), deflection does not appear to introduce significant
`
`JDS UNIPHASE CORPORATION
`JDS UNIPHASE CORPORATION
`Exhibit 1030, Page 2
`Exhibit 1030, Page 2
`
`

`

`
`
`WALKER at mi: MECHANICAL ANTIREFLEC'ITDN SWITCH FOR FIBER-‘I‘C‘l-THH-HOME SYSTEMS
`
`4'!
`
`signal
`
`wire bond
`
`[is]. membrane
`
`W4 air gap (at odd)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`-“
`
`Fig. 3. MARS device operation.
`
`degradation by itself. In fact, etu‘valure of die optical window
`may actually help since we operate with the deflected state as
`[he antit‘cflection stale, and so it will tend to deflect light away
`from the optical fiber and augment contrast.
`Fig. 4 shows the model of the optical spectrum for a device
`hailing a suspended film which is a composite of 1000 A
`of polysilicon and l950 A of silicon nitride with an index
`of 1.87. As one can see.
`the performance is very similar in
`nature to that of the single film [3]. This is because the poly—
`silicon layer is assumed to have the same refractive index as
`that of the silicon substrate. so tltat when the membrane is in
`contact with the substrate (or for any in even). the structure
`is optically identical to die nitride—only membrane. Since the
`poly-silicon layer is M4 thick. for m. odd it actually augments
`the reflectivity. leading to enhanced modulation. As will be
`discussed below,
`the use of this composite film structure
`provides some flexibility in tailoring mechanical properties
`without affecting optical performance.
`
`“I. FABRICATION
`
`The fabrication of lht: MARS device is complicated by
`the interdependent nature of the mechanical properties. op-
`tical performance requirements, and electrical performance of
`the device. For a given silicon nitride film deposited using
`plasma—enhanced chemical vapor deposition (PECVD),
`the
`residual
`film stress cannot be tailored without affecting the
`film‘s refractive index. Also, changes in film stress affect
`
`
`
`wavelength (rim)
`
`spectrum for a suspended composite film of
`Fig,4. Modeled optical
`IODO-A-Ihick polysllicon and IL‘SD—A-thick silicon nitride.
`
`
`
`Fig. 5. Topographical and side views ol‘ a typical MARS device,
`
`the required drive voltage for actuation and the ability to
`obtain reasonable yield after die sacrificial layer etch. For the
`simplest film structure consisting of an aluminum sacrificial
`film and silicon nitride membrane. these constraints provide a
`significant challenge.
`The structure of a representative MARS device is shown in
`Fig. 5. The mechanically active area of the device is defined
`as die area released from the substrate and consists of the
`central plate supported by thin support beams. An opening in
`the electrode material on the central plate defines the optical
`window of the device. Obviously, variations of this structure
`are possible and many have been fabricated. For the purposes
`of this paper. however, we are confining our discussion to this
`basic structure.
`In Ihe simplest fabrication method. we begin by depositing
`a SAM—thick film (1.16 nm thick for an operating wavelength
`of 1560 nm) of E-gun evaporated aluminum on a doped silicon
`substrate. A film of PECVD silicon nitride is then deposited
`on the aluminum using 200 seem of 2% silanc in nitrogen.
`900 sccm of pure nitrogen. and 3 seem ammonia at 250°C.
`60 rnvtr'rtvm2 and son mTorr. This results in a tastt-A—ihick
`
`silicon nitride film with an index of 1.9 :: 0.05, which is
`under moderate tensile strain. This film is patterned using an
`SF5ICClgFg reactive ion etch to form the devices. Electrodes
`are then added using lift-off of 55 A of titanium and 1000 A
`of gold. The structure is then released in a 60°C bath of
`commercially available aluminum etch and rinsed in flowing
`
`JDS UNIPHASE CORPORATION
`JDS UNIPHASE CORPORATION
`Exhibit 1030, Page 3
`Exhibit 1030, Page 3
`
`

`

`
`
`48
`
`JOURNAL OF WCROELECI'ROMECHAMCM. SYSTEMS. VOL. 5. NO.
`
`l. MARCH I996
`
`
`
`Fig. 6. Completed MARS device.
`
`DI water for five minutes. A sequential exchange of water
`with methanol is then used and the devices are left to air dry.
`An SFLM photograph of a completed, released device is shown
`in Fig. 6.
`While the aluminumlPECVD nitride structure is convenient
`from the point of view of equipment capability and cost.
`this choice of material system does present some problems.
`Aluminum, while easily deposited and etched,
`is a less than
`ideal sacrificial film for diis device. When depositing thick-
`nesses approaching ] out. the surface of aluminum can become
`quite rough and hillocks of greater than 1 out can form. We
`have explored the use of both thermally evaporated aluminum
`and E—gun evaporated aluminum. The surface structure of the
`E—gun aluminum was found to have a considerably smoother
`
`surface with an average surface roughness of :60 A, as
`
`opposed to :250 A for diermal aluminum. These roughness
`values are for as deposited films. During PECVD nitride
`deposition they become rougher due to the heating and induced
`stress associated with the PECVD process.
`In addition. because we are using PECVD silicon nitride,
`pinhole formation in the dielectric is a potential problem.
`When coupled with the surface roughness of the aluminum,
`pinhole density becomes an even greater issue. From Fig. 3.
`one can see that if the sacrificial film is a conductor, the electric
`field for a given voltage is much higher under the wire bond
`pad area of the device than in the moving area. Therefore. the
`existence of pinholes in the nitride or aluminum hillocks under
`the nitride can lead to shorting of the electrodes and failure
`of the device.
`In addition to changing the sacrificial
`film.
`we have tried two approaches to circumventing this problem.
`1) We have added a lOOlJ-A-thick film of evaporated silicon
`monoxide under the wire bond pad area as an extra insulator.
`2) We are patterning the aluminum so that it only exists in
`the mechanically active area of the device. We have found
`both methods can be successful. however the aluminum island
`approach requires a conformal silicon niu-ide and complicates
`the mechanical properties of the device.
`In our first attempts to fabricate the device, we chose an
`electrode structure of a 50—A—thick layer of chrome followed
`
`by a iOlJO—rlt—thick film of pure gold. The purpose of the
`chrome is to aid the adhesion of the gold to the silicon
`nitride. Upon removal from the aluminum etch used to release
`the membranes, the contacts appeared to be good. While the
`devices were being electrically actuated. however, bubbling
`under the gold was observed. The bubbling would continue
`until finally the electrode. and therefore the device, would
`fail. The same electrical signal was applied to devices that
`had not been released with no observation of this effect.
`It was concluded that the aluminum etch was attacking the
`chrome adhesion film during release. leading to failure. We
`have subsequently switched to titanium for the adhesion film,
`and this has resulted in a robust, reliable electrode.
`Since the structure is conceptually so simple, there are a
`myriad of other material systems from which to choose. Most
`of our work, however, has been with the aluminumlnilride
`structure due to available technology, We are presently eval—
`uating the use of other metals (cg, copper), polymers (e.g..
`polyimidc). and highly HF~soluble glasses as the sacrificial
`film. Obviously. as with any micromachining process, etch
`selectivity is a concern. This is especially true here. since any
`change in the nitride membrane thickness would change the
`optical properties of the device.
`Another material system we have explored consists of a
`sacrificial layer of silicon dioxide and a composite structural
`layer of a lDOO—A-thicit film of polysilicon and a lQSO-A-thick
`film of silicon nitride. There are several advantages to this type
`of structure. 1) The mechanical properties of the membrane
`can be decoupled from its optical performance, since the
`stress in die polysilicon film can be tailored independently
`of any properties of the subsequent silicon nitride film. When
`using just a nitride film, the residual stress in the film and
`its refractive index are coupled. 2) A local oxidation method
`(LOCOS) can be used to form an oxide island under the
`desired mechanically active region only. 3) The polysilicon
`can be made arbitrarily thick outside of the optical window.
`making the structure less compliant and making the release
`procedure more reliable.
`To this point. suction upon release or the polysiliconrnitride
`structure has been a problem. In part, this is due to our choice
`of Affil-thick oxide films for the sacrificial layers as well as the
`high compliance of the lODO—A-thick polysilicon film. We are
`presently exploring the use of a 3M4 gap as well as adding
`thicker structural polysilicon outside of the optical window.
`We are also exploring the use of supercritical C02 release
`procedures reported elsewhere |81.
`Because device cost is of such paramount importance for our
`intended application, we have kept our fabrication methods as
`simple as possible. Estimates of fabrication costs are in the
`range of a few pennies per device. We feel
`that packaging
`costs will be the dominant cost for any completed system.
`Fortunately.
`in this case the packaging costs should also be
`relatively low since the device is a surface normal device of
`very small size. In addition. Ihe optical window can be made
`much larger than the core of a standard single-mode fiber
`resulting in alignment tolerances of tens of microns. Finally,
`the device is polarization independent. All of these factors
`should result in very low-cost packaging.
`
`JDS UNIPHASE CORPORATION
`JDS UNIPHASE CORPORATION
`Exhibit 1030, Page 4
`Exhibit 1030, Page 4
`
`

`

`
`
`WRIKER fl ml; MECHANICAL ANTIREFLECI'ION SWITCH FOR HBER-TU-‘I‘HF/HUME SYSTEMS
`
`‘9
`
`reflectivity 9an
`
`0.3 ‘
`
`0.2
`
`0.1
`
`0.0
`1300
`
`1320
`
`1340
`
`1360
`
`1380
`
`14m
`
`1420
`
`1440
`
`contrast
`
`ratio
`
`1300
`
`1&0
`
`1340
`
`1360
`
`1380
`
`14400
`
`1420
`
`1440
`
`wavelength (nml
`Fig. 3'. Measured optical spectra for a lA-thickncss air gap device.
`
`IV. RESULTS
`
`All of the results discussed here were obtained using devices
`fabricated with the aluminumfPECVD nitride process. As
`mentioned above, variations of beam width, length. and central
`plate sire have been explored. The central plate has been varied
`from 10 x 10 pm to 100 x 100 pm. The beam width has been
`varied from 2—21 pm. and beam lengths range from 5—?5 pm.
`A model of the mechanical performance is being developed
`in order to optimize the device structure.
`We have fabricated samples for operating wavelengths rang—
`ing from 1300—1560 nm. determined primarily by Ihe thickness
`of the sacrificial
`film. The spectral bandwidth for an alu—
`minumft'litride device with a zero-bias air gap of roughly 1.37
`pm is shown in Fig. 7. The spectra for bias conditions of 20
`and 40 V show a measured contrast ratio of roughly 15: l at
`l37t} nm for this device. Using a minimum contrast ratio of
`10: l, the spectral width of the device is approximately 40 rim,
`as would be expected based on the modeling shown in Fig. 3
`showing that as the air gap thickness is increased, the spectral
`width decreases.
`Since a device in service in a F'I'I'H system would be
`subjected to temperatures ranging from summer in Arizona to
`winter in Alaska, it was necessary to examine the temperature
`variation of the operating parameters. Therefore, the ambient
`temperature of this device was varied from —50°C to 90°C in
`order to determine what effect this would have on the spectral
`response. DC measurements were done in vacuum in order to
`avoid the formation of frost on the device. As can be seen
`in Fig. 8. although there is a shift in central wavelength. the
`contrast ratio remains relatively high over the desired range of
`wavelengths. We believe the shift is due to thermal expansion
`of materials and changes in the air gap due to temperature
`variant stresses. it may be possible to alleviate some of these
`issues with modifications to the device structure, as well as by
`broadening the optical bandwidth of die device by reducing
`the air gap.
`We performed speed measurements on one of the m. = 4
`devices (air gap = A) with a 30 x 3t] rim central plate. 20-
`rrm-long x Swpm—wide support beams, and a drive voltage of
`
`wavelength {hm}
`
`Fig. 8. Modulator contrast ratio spectra at
`90°C.
`
`temperatures from —50°C Io
`
`
`
`Fig. 9. Temporal response to a square wave drive signal.
`
`25 V. The electrode area extends down Ihe support beams and
`covers the outer edge of the central plate. leaving an optical
`window of 20 x 20 um. Since the required drive voltage scales
`as the inverse of the square of air gap. the drive voltage can be
`significantly reduced by going to an air gap of m = l or using
`a tiered structure that has an electrode spacing of m = 1. but
`a different optical window spacing.
`Device response to a square wave drive pulse train is
`shown in Fig. 9. where rise and fall
`times for the device
`are 132 and [25 us (as measured in a standard laboratory
`environment). respectively. For a data communications system.
`these translate to a bitrate greater than ‘2 Mbills. Devices from
`the same wafer with central plates of 40 x 40 um were tested
`and found to have rise and fall times of roughly 350 as. Similar
`devices were tested in both an ambienrar‘r environment and in
`vacuum, and it was found that air damping is a dominating
`factor for device speed. The trace for
`the 20 x 20 pm
`device shows some ringing due to an underdamped oscillator
`condition. A clean signal can theoretically be obtained through
`the use of simple signal-conditioning techniques [31.
`A 40 x 40 pm plate device was placed in a measurement
`setup and run at 500 lit-la for 50 days or over 2 trillion cycles.
`
`JDS UNIPHASE CORPORATION
`JDS UNIPHASE CORPORATION
`Exhibit 1030, Page 5
`Exhibit 1030, Page 5
`
`

`

`
`
`50
`
`JOURNAL OF MICROELSCFROMECHANICAL SYSTEMS. VOL 5. NO. 1. MARCH 1996
`
`There was no sign of any degradation of signal over the entire
`time, nor was there any change in required drive voltage. The
`device ultimately failed due to electrode failure as will be
`discussed below. not due to mechanical failure as might be
`expected. The experiment was run in a standard laboratory.
`with no special environmental conditions. It is important to
`note that this experiment was perforated en a device with an
`m = 4 air gap. and the membrane did not come into contact
`with the substrate during operation.
`
`V. DISCUSSION
`
`The MARS device has been shown to be a viable choice
`for a corrtntunications system optical modulator. The advan-
`tage of the use of a simple material system such as the
`aluminunttnitride structure lies in the ease of manufacture. and
`therefore cost. of the device. There are some aspects to its
`fabrication that require further investigation and discussion.
`As mentioned earlier,
`the use of a conductor (Specifically
`aluminum) as a sacrificial
`layer causes several difficulties.
`especially when coupled with the use of PECVD silicon nitride
`as the structural material. By moving the conductive surface
`of the silicon up to the bottom of the silicon nitride,
`the
`electric field strength is made unnecessarily high in the region
`of the wire bond pad. The pressure on the membrane for a
`:2
`given voltage goes as m where e is the relative SiN;
`static dielectric constant. 3:1 is the thickness of the SiN... and
`:72 is the thickness of the air gap. For an m = 4 device.
`this means the electrostatic force under the wire bond pad is
`2800 times higher than that in the active area of the device.
`Since PECVD nitride is prone to pinhole formation and the
`aluminum surface can be quite tough, this can result in shorting
`of contacts through pinholes. Also, PECVD silicon nitride
`is a poor electrical
`insulator in general. which can lead to
`current leakage. By adding a lDOLLA-mick silicon monoxide
`pad between the silicon nitride and the electrode. we have
`overcome these problems. We are presently exploring other
`sacrificial films such as copper. silicon dioxide, and polyirnide.
`Theoretically. the use of an oxidetpolysiliconlnilride struc-
`ture would alleviate all of the above problems. There are
`other problems associated with this structure that would need
`to be addressed. however. Primarily. the etch selectivity of
`hydrofluoric acid to silicon dioxide and silicon nitride must
`be taken into account. Any change in silicon nitride thickness
`not only changes the mechanical performance of the device.
`but
`the optical performance as well.
`In addition.
`release
`methods for this structure are much more complicated than
`with the aluminum/nitride structure due to the well—known
`stiction problem of polysilicon upon release. As discussed
`earlier.
`the use of very thick (2 nm) support beams outside
`the optical window as well as the use of supercritical C02
`release techniques show promise.
`
`VI. CONCLUSION
`
`We have presented results for a micromcchanical modulator
`that demonstrate its utility as a communications device for
`fibcr~to-the—home applications. The MARS device has been
`shown to have high speed. greater than 2 Mbittts data rates,
`
`temperature insensitivity win-1 > ID dB contrast from —50 to
`90°C,
`long—term reliability. and low cost. We estimate that
`the cost for a MARS device itself will be a few pennies. and
`therefore the cost of a packaged device will be dominated
`by the packaging cosm memselvcs. Due to the polarization
`insensitivity and large optical window area relative to an
`optical fiber core. however. these should also remain relatively
`low.
`
`REFERENCES
`
`{l} '1‘. Wood. E. C. Carr. B. L. Casper. R. A. Linke. C. A. Bums. and
`K. L. Walker. “Bi—directional optical fiber transmission using a multiple
`quantum well
`('MQW] modulatorfducctor." Electron. Lett. vol. 22.
`pp.5'28—533.
`l986.
`{2] N. I. Frigo. P. D. Magill. T. E. Darcie, P. P. lannonc. M. M. Downs.
`B. N. Dcsai. U. Koren. T. L. Koch, C, DragOne. and H. M. Presby.
`"RISE-net: A passive optical network architecture based on the remote
`interrogation of terminal equipment." in Oprr'cal Fiber Confi. San Jose.
`CA. 1994. post—deadline paper P138. pp. 43—41
`[3] K. W. Goossen. l. A. Walker, and S. C. Arney. "Silicon modulator based
`on mechanically-active anti-reflection layer with l MBiu’sec capability
`for fiber—in-the-loop applications.“ IEEE Photon. fichtrol'. tart. vol. 6.
`no. 9. pp. 11194121. 1994.
`14] C. Dragonc. “An N X N optical multiplexer using a planar arrangement
`of two star couplers." JEEE Photon. Technol. tern. vol. 3. pp. 812—815.
`199l.
`[S] O. Solgaard. F. S. A. Sandejas. and D. M. Bloom. "beformahie grating
`optical modulator." Optic: Let!" vol. l7. no. 9. pp. 683—690. 1992.
`[6] G. McDonald. M. Boysel. and J. Sampscll. “4 x 4 fiber-optic crossbar
`switch using the deformable mirror device.“ in USA Tech. Dig. Spatial
`Light Modulators and Applicaitonr, I990. vol. 14. pp. 80-33.
`[T] K. Aritani. P. 5. French. P. M. Sane. R. F. Wolffcnbuttel. and 5. Mid-
`dlehoek. “Process and design considerations for surface micromschincd
`beams for a tuneahle interferometer array in silicon." in Proc. IEEE
`MEMS Workshop. Fort Lauderdale. H... Feb. T—ltl. 1993. pp. 230—235.
`[8] G. T. Mulhem. D. S. Scene. and R. T. Howe. "Supercritical carbon
`dioxide drying of n'ticrostruclurcs.” in 71h Int. Confi Solid'Stare Sensor:
`aodatcruarors—Tl-wwducers '93. Yokohama. Japan. 1993. pp. 296-299.
`
`
`
`James A. Walker received the 13.8. and MS. do,
`grees in electrical engineering from Rutgers Uni-
`versity. New Brunswick. NJ.
`in 1984 and l989.
`reapectively.
`He joined AT&T Bell Laboratories in 1984 and
`is currently a Member of Technical Staff in the
`Advanced Photonics Research Department. lie has
`been active in the field ol‘ trticroelecrromechanical
`systems (MEMS) since 1936. His research inter—
`ests have included high—frequency LED's. thin—film
`shape memory alloy and. presently. the integration
`'
`of {ll—V photonic devices to VLSLI'ULSI silicon electronics by {lip—chip
`bonding and hetero-epitaxy.
`
`
`
`Keith W. Gounsen received the 8.3. degree
`in electrical engineering from the University of
`California. Santa Barbara.
`in I983. and the PhD.
`degree in electrical engineering from Princeton
`University. Princeton. NJ. in I988.
`In 1983 he joined AT&T Bell Laboratories.
`Holmdcl. NJ. where his work has been primarily
`on surface—normal optical modulators and their in—
`tegration with electronics for optical interconnects.
`This
`includes
`Ihe first demonstration of high—
`spccd. W..Sl-denslty optical
`transceivers utilizing
`silicon CMOS- and Gains-based modulators via flip-chip bonding. Hr. has
`also investigated integration of quantum-well modulators on silicon via
`direct epitaxy and produced extensive research on quantumuwell modulator
`technology.
`
`JDS UNIPHASE CORPORATION
`JDS UNIPHASE CORPORATION
`Exhibit 1030, Page 6
`Exhibit 1030, Page 6
`
`

`

`
`
`WALKER er mi: MIIHANICAL AN'I'IREFLECTION SWITCH FOR FlBER—TO—"l'l-lE-HOME SYSTEMS
`
`S}
`
`
`
`Susanne C. Amey received the BS. degree in
`materials science and engineering from the Mass—
`achusetts Institute of Technology. Cambridge. MA.
`in l931. She received the MS. and PhD. degrees
`in electrical engineering from Cornell University.
`Ilhasa. NY.
`in 1988 and 1992. respectively. Her
`PILD. dissertation evaluated the new—electrical and
`nun-electromechanical applications of the Silicon-
`on-insulamr (SCI) technique.
`Ihe M0
`From 1931 In 1984,
`she worked at
`lomla Bipolar Technology Center
`in Mesa, AZ,
`as a Process and Device Development Engineer. Her work involved the
`development of a Ircnch isolation process. She is currently a Member of
`Technical Staff at AT&T Bell Laboratories in Murray Hill. NI. with an active
`research program in silicon—based micrumachining and microclcclmrncchan-
`ical systems {MEMS}.
`
`JDS UNIPHASE CORPORATION
`JDS UNIPHASE CORPORATION
`Exhibit 1030, Page 7
`Exhibit 1030, Page 7
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket