throbber
Inter Partes Review of USPN RE42,678
`
`Declaration of Joseph E. Ford, Ph.D.f Joseph E. Ford, Pdd
`optical signal. Id. at 2:49–65; 4:39–42; 4:59–67. Sparks explains that the control
`
`means controls the operation of the MEMS mirrors to misalign the paths of the
`
`reflected beams, and thus to effect a predetermined output power for each of the
`
`channels passing through the switch. Id. at 2:45–48; 6:2–10.
`
`166. A PHOSITA would have been motivated to combine Bouevitch with
`
`Sparks for a number of independent reasons. A PHOSITA would have been
`
`motivated to combine Bouevitch with Sparks for many of the same reasons
`
`discussed above with respect to the combination of Bouevitch and Carr.
`
`Fundamentally, the two references cover highly related subject matter. Each
`Fundamentally, the two references cover highly related subject matter. Each
`
`reference discusses devices in the same field of fiber optic communications. Id. at
`reference discusses devices in the same field of fiber optic communications. Id. at
`
`2:20-25; Ex. 1002 at 1:10–19. Each reference is directed at the same application in
`2:20-25; Ex. 1002 at 1:10–19. Each reference is directed at the same application in
`
`that field—optical switching for wavelength-division-multiplexed (WDM)
`that field—dd optical switching for wavelength-division-multiplexed (WDM)
`
`communications. Each reference discloses an optical add/drop switch using a
`communications. Each reference discloses an optical add/drop switch using a
`
`MEMS-based WSS for switching. As a result, using the known 2-axis mirrors
`MEMS-based WSS for switching. As a result, using the known 2-axis mirrors
`
`from Sparks in the Bouevitch COADM would have been nothing more than using
`from Sparks in the Bouevitch COADM would have been nothing more than using
`
`known techniques to improve similar devices. Because of the similarity between
`known techniques to improve similar devices. Because of the similarity between
`
`the devices disclosed in each reference, a PHOSITA would expect that each of
`the devices disclosed in each reference, a PHOSITA would expect that each of
`
`these well-known techniques could be applied to the devices of the other patent. A
`these well-known techniques could be applied to the devices of e other patent. A
`
`PHOSITA would find it natural and obvious to combine teachings of Sparks with
`PHOSITA would find it natural and obvious t
`teachings of Sparks with
`
`the disclosure of Bouevitch, e.g., in light of my discussion in Sec. XI.D.1 above of
`the disclosure of Bouevitch, e.g., in light of my discussion in Sec. XI.D.1 above of
`
`86
`86
`
`0001
`
`Capella 2011
`Fujitsu v. Capella
`IPR2015-00727
`
`

`
`
`Inter Partes Review of USPN RE42,678Inter Partes Review of USPN RE42,678
`
`
`Declaration of Joseph E. Ford, Ph.D.Declaration of Joseph E. Ford, Ph.D.dd
`the functional schema of Bouevitch. Namely, providing the MEMS mirrors of
`the functional schema of Bouevitch. Namely, providing the MEMS mirrors of
`
`Bouevitch with two-axis tilt capability enables the spatial positioning of returning
`Bouevitch with two-axis tilt capability enables the spatial positioning of returning
`
`beams in both transverse directions at the face of microlens array 12. Thus, errors
`beams in both transverse directions at the face of microlens array 12. Thus, errors
`
`in system alignment arising, e.g., from imperfect assembly or temperature
`in system alignment arising, e.g., from imperfect assembly or temperature
`
`changes—well known problems in free space optical systems—could be better
`
`changes—well known problems in free space optical systems— —could be better
`
`
`compensated.
`compensated.
`
`167. For example, a PHOSITA would have been motivated to combine the
`
`two-axis movable MEMS mirrors of Sparks with the COADM of Bouevitch based
`
`on the teachings of the references, common sense and knowledge generally
`
`available to a PHOSITA, as the proposed combination would merely entail
`
`substituting known elements to yield predictable results. Bouevitch discloses a
`
`COADM where multi-wavelength light is spatially dispersed into channels by a
`
`diffraction grating and each channel is reflected by a different mirror in an array of
`
`MEMS mirrors along a different path for adding and dropping optical signals. Ex.
`
`1002 at 14:14–15:18, FIG. 11. Sparks discloses using movable micromirrors
`
`capable of two axis movement so that “each of the channels passing through the
`
`switch may be attenuated to whatever degree necessary to achieve the desired
`
`effect.” Ex. 1006 at 2:30–35; 4:39–47. As a result, using the known two-axis
`
`mirrors of Sparks in the Bouevitch COADM entails nothing more than the use of
`
`known techniques to improve similar devices.
`
`87
`87
`
`0002

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket