throbber
Surface-Micromachined Free-Space Fiber Optic Switches
`With Integrated Microactuators for Optical Fiber Communication Systems
`
`1A4.07P
`
`Shi-Sheng Lee, Ed M0tamedi*, and Ming C. Wu
`UCLA, Room 63-128 Engineering 4 Building
`405 Hilgard Avenue, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA, lee@icsl.ucla.edu
`*Rockwell Science Center, Thousand Oaks, CA 91360, USA
`
`SUMMARY
`
`We report on a novel surface-micromachined free-
`space fiber optic switch with integrated microactuators
`for optical
`fiber communication systems. The switch
`consists of an out-of-plane micromirror driven by
`integrated scratch drive actuators, and balanced by a
`spring. A fall time and a rise time of 15 ms and 6 ms have
`been achieved, respectively. The switch is equipped with
`the fail—safe feature as required by the FDDI optical
`bypass switch. In addition, a vibration g-test has been
`conducted while the switch is transmitting data. Error
`free operation up to 89 g’s has been achieved for
`vibration frequencies from 200 Hz to 10 kHz.
`
`Keywords: Optical Switch, Surface-Micromachining,
`Microactuators
`
`INTRODUCTION
`
`Optical fiber offers many advantages compared with
`electric cables, including high bandwidth, low loss, light
`weight,
`immunity from lightening strikes
`and the
`resultant
`current
`surges,
`and
`no
`electromagnetic
`interference.
`Fiber optic networks
`such as
`fiber
`distributed data interface (FDDI) are widely accepted and
`supported by the industry as one of the international
`standards for high-speed local area networks (LAN).
`
`Fiber optic switches are used in the network to
`reconfigure the network and/or increase its reliability. For
`example, FDDI fiber optic network employs optional 2x2
`fiber optic switches, called optical bypass switches,
`to
`bypass the failed nodes. When the FDDI node is powered
`on, the bypass switch routes the incoming signal from
`ring into the station, and directs the transmitted signal
`from the station to the ring. When the FDDI node is
`powered off or failed, the optical bypass switch allows
`the data signals to bypass the node and maintain the ring
`continuity. Since the switch introduces additional optical
`loss, fiber optic switches should be designed to minimize
`the insertion loss. The switch can be realized by free-
`space approach or waveguide approach. The free-space
`approach [1-3] offers a number of advantages over the
`conventional waveguide approach [4].
`It has lower
`
`coupling loss and smaller cross talk. Conventional free-
`space fiber optic switches employ bulk optical elements
`and are Very expensive. Recently,
`there has been a
`growing interest in applying micromachining technology
`to improve the performance and reduce the cost of opto-
`mechanical switches. Bulk—micromachined Si has been
`
`combined with external actuators to implement 2x2
`switches [l]. A bulk micromachined 2x2 matrix switch
`has also been demonstrated [2]. Deep reactive ion etching
`has been employed to realize a 2x2 switch on silicon on
`insulator wafer [3]. However, they often require unique
`processes and special processing techniques, such as
`extra thick SOI (silicon-on-insulator) wafers and deep
`RIE (reactive ion etching) machine.
`
`Surface-micromachining technique, based on the
`standard CMOS processes, on the other hand, offers
`greater flexibility for realizing free-space optical systems
`on a
`single
`chip. Three—dimensional micro—optical
`elements, micropositioners, and microactuators can be
`fabricated by a single unified process [5-6]. Previously,
`we have used the surface—micromachined technique to
`demonstrate a 2x2 fiber optic switches
`[7]. Lower
`insertion loss has been demonstrated. In this paper, we
`report on the performance of a fully actuated 2x2 fiber
`optic switch. A vibration test up to 89’g has also been
`conducted for an active switch, and the experimental
`results will be discussed in the paper.
`
`DESIGN AND FABRICATION
`
`The schematic diagram of the switch is shown in
`Figure 1. It consists of a moveable 3D micromirror, four
`fiber guiding rails, and microactuators. The out—of-plane
`3D micromirror
`is
`realized
`by
`the micro—hinge
`technology [8] and is integrated on a translation stage. It
`is positioned at the center of the switch and allowed to
`move along the x-axis. The mirror has been coated with a
`500 nm-thick gold layer to increase the reflectivity. The
`switch operates in REFLECTION state without activating
`any actuators. The micromirror can be pulled away from
`the center of fibers by a set of six integrated scratch drive
`actuator (SDA) [9], which will change the switch from
`REFLECTION to TRANSMISSION state. A pul1—in
`spring has been integrate with the micromirror to
`
`0-7803-3829-4/97/$10.00 ©1997 IEEE
`
`85
`
`TRANSDUCERS ’97
`1997 International Conference on Solid-State Sensors and Actuators
`Chicago, June 16- 19, 1997
`
`FNC 1029
`
`

`
`
`
`Thermal
`Actuator
`
`Array
`
`Pu||—Back
`
`Spring
`
`1A4.07P
`
`Optical Fiber Guide
`
`Figure 1." Schematic diagram of the surface-micromachined 2x2 free-space fiber optic switch
`
`implement the “fail—safe” feature of the FDDI optical
`bypass switch. The micromirror can be held at
`the
`TRANSMISSION state by applying a DC bias to the
`SDA. When the DC voltage is released, or when power
`failure occurs, the pull—in spring will return the switch to
`the REFLECTION state. Alternatively,
`the switch can
`also be held at the TRANSMISSION state by locking the
`translation stage into a mechanical latch so that no DC
`power is required. The mechanical latch can be released
`by an integrated thermal actuator array [10].
`In this
`configuration, the actuators are actuated only during the
`switching time, therefore the overall power consumption
`of the switch is very small. The SDAS are driven by a
`sinusoidal voltage source. The minimum amplitude of
`applied voltage is 80V. Thermal actuators can be driven
`by a voltage source as small as 5V in amplitude.
`
`fabricated using the three—layer
`The switch is
`polysilicon surface—micromachining technology offered
`by MEMS Technology Application Center at North
`Carolina (MCNC) under Defense Advanced Research
`Projects Agency (DARPA) supported Multi—User MEMS
`Processes
`(MUMPS). Figure 2 shows
`the scanning
`electron micrograph (SEM) of the mirror with the sliding
`plate and the microactuators. The fabrication process of
`the switch is summarized in the following: First, a 0.5-
`um-thick polysilicon is deposited on the silicon substrate
`
`This layer of
`coated with low—stress silicon nitride.
`polysilicon serves as an electrical contact where it
`is
`needed. Before the deposition of the first structural
`polysilicon layer
`(polyl),
`a 2.0-um-thick sacrificial
`phosphosilicate glass
`(PSG)
`layer
`is deposited. The
`sliding plate, part of the mirror hinge assembly and
`thermal actuators are defined on the polyl layer.
`
`TRANSDUCERS '97
`1997 International Conference on Solid-State Sensors and Actuators
`Chicago, June 16-19, 1997
`
`
`
`Figure 2: SEM ofthe switch
`
`A 0.75-um-thick PSG layer is then deposited before the
`deposition of
`the
`1.5-um-thick
`second
`structural
`polysilicon layer (poly2). The mirror, sliding plate guide
`rail, part of the mirror hinge assembly and SDAs are
`defined on poly2 layer. At the final processing step, a
`0.5-um-thick gold layer is deposited on the surfaces of
`the mirror and electrical contacts
`to increase the
`
`reflectivity and electrical conductivity, respectively.
`
`EXPERIMENTS AND RESULTS
`
`Switching Test
`
`four multimode
`In the switching experiment,
`optical fibers with 62.5 um core diameters are attached to
`the
`Si
`substrate. The
`insertion losses have been
`
`characterized to be 1.3 dB and 1.9 dB [7]
`
`for
`
`the
`
`

`
`pulled back to the center by the pull-in spring. A rise time
`of 6 ms has been achieved.
`
`1A4.07P
`
`SpeedofSDA(mm/sec)
`
`01DO
`
`0
`
`O 5101520253035404550
`
`Applied voltage frequencies (kHz
`
`Figure 4: Plot ofSDA speed
`applied voltage
`
`Vibration Test
`
`We have also performed the vibration test of the
`surface—micromachined fiber optic switch at Rockwell
`Science Center. The purpose of this test is to investigate
`the robustness of the surface—micromachined fiber optic
`switch against
`external vibrations.
`In particular,
`quantitative measurement in terms of the data bit error
`rate
`(BER) has been obtained.
`To the
`authors’
`knowledge, this is the first time such measurement was
`ever performed.
`
`The schematic diagram of the experimental setup
`is shown in Figure 5. In this experiment, we prepared the
`
`Tektronix
`
`Digital Oscilloscope
`In
`
`
`
`Hewlett Packard
`Bit Error Tester
`Out
`in
`
`
`
`
` Hewlett Packard
`
`FDDI Transceiver
`Out
`in
`
`
`
`
`Side-Mounted
`
`Switch
`
`Optical Fiber
`
`Vibration
`
`
`
`Testing
`Machine
`
`Figure 5: The experimental setup
`
`87
`
`TRANSDUCERS ’97
`1997 International Conference on Solid-State Sensors and Actuators
`Chicago, June 16-19, 1997
`
`states,
`REFLECTION
`and
`TRANSMISSION
`respectively. The fiber—to-fiber spacing is 80 um and the
`fiber
`tip has been melted to
`form hemispherical
`microlenses. A commercial optical
`transceiver
`from
`Hewlett Packard Company (HP)
`is used as the light
`source and the receiver. The switching characteristics is
`measured by monitoring the reflected signal on a HP real-
`time digital oscilloscope.
`
`(b)
`
`Figure 3 : Response ofthe photodetector during the
`switchingfor: (a) from THROUGH state to
`CROSS state, (b) vise versa.
`
`Figure 3(a) shows the fall time of the optical switch when
`the micromirror is pulled away by the SDAs. When the
`SDA is biased at peak voltage of 100 V at 30 kHz, a fall
`time of 15 ms has been achieved. Since the speed of the
`SDA is proportional to the actuating frequency, higher
`switching speed can be achieved by operating the SDA at
`higher frequencies. The speed of the SDA versus applied
`signal
`frequencies are plotted in Figure 4. We have
`successfully actuated SDAs up to 50kHz (limited by our
`power supply). At 50kHz,
`the SDAs are moving at a
`speed of 2.5 mm/sec, which corresponds to a step size of
`25nm per cycle. The switching from TRANSMISSION
`state to REFLECTION state is achieved by actuating the
`thermal actuator
`to release the latch. The switching
`characteristics is shown in Fig. 3(b). The micromirror is
`
`

`
`1A4.07P
`MEMS switch in the REFLECTION mode.
`
`Two
`
`multimode optical fibers are attached to the Si substrate
`for
`in situ monitoring of the optical
`signals during
`vibration. The switch is mounted in the Unholtz-Dickie
`
`vibration—testing machine with the hinged micromirror
`facing the axis of the vibration. The photograph of the
`experimental setup is shown in Figure 6.
`Since the
`hinged micromirror is most sensitive to vibration in this
`direction, this measurement result should be considered
`as the worst case of vibrations in three axes. An HP bit
`
`error rate tester is used to drive the optical transceiver
`and measure the error rate, and a Tektronix real-time
`
`digital oscilloscope is used to record the eye diagram.
`
`.
`
`, MEMS Switch
`
`K
`
`g Machm;
`
`Vibration
`
`579%;
`
`Figure 6: The photograph of the switch mounted on the
`vibration testing machine
`
`The performance of the MEMS optical switch
`under vibration is evaluated by measuring the bit error
`rate of the received optical signal in the REFLECTION
`mode. A 223-1 bit long random test patterns at 100 MHz
`clock rate are used to investigate the vibration sensitivity
`at a wide range of frequencies. Error-free operation up to
`89’s
`(equipment-limited) was observed for vibration
`frequencies from 200 Hz to 10 kHz. Comparison of the
`receiving sensitivity with and without vibration shows
`that there is virtually no effect of vibration of this scale.
`No mechanical failure observed throughout
`the entire
`test. A measured eye diagram of the received signal
`under l50Hz, 50g vibration is shown in Figure 5. Clear
`open eyes were observed.
`
`CONCLU$ON
`
`switches with
`A 2x 2 free-space fiber optic
`integrated microactuators have been demonstrated using
`the surface—micromachining technology. The switch has
`achieved fall
`time and rise time of 15 ms and 6 ms,
`respectively. Higher
`speed operation is possible by
`operating the scratch drive actuator at higher frequencies.
`We have performed the vibration test of the surface-
`
`TRANSDUCERS '97
`1997 International Conference on Solid-State Sensors and Actuators
`Chicago, June 16-19, 1997
`
`88
`
`
`
`I. '
`
`'2'ci0'mi/'0'
`
`'
`
`'9
`
`'
`
`"M" 2.'0'0n's§ 'ch2'
`
`’
`
`'
`
`'—3'0'm\'/"'
`
`Figure 7: A measured eye diagram ofthe device at
`50 g" and 150 Hz ofan external vibration
`
`micromachined fiber optic switch. This is the first time
`such measurement was
`ever performed. Error—free
`operation up to 89 g’s has been achieved for vibration
`frequencies from 200112 to 10kHz. The robustness and
`the batch fabrication process make this
`switch an
`attractive
`candidate
`for
`low cost
`opto—mechanical
`switches for fiber optic communications.
`
`This project is supported by DARPA.
`
`REFERENCES
`
`[1]
`
`[2]
`
`[3]
`
`[4]
`
`[5]
`
`[6]
`
`[7]
`
`[8]
`
`[9]
`
`[10]
`
`M. F. Dautartas, A. M. Benzoni, Y. C. Chen and G. E. Blonder, “ A
`silicon-based moving-mirror
`optical
`switch”,
`J.
`of Lightwave
`Technology, Vol. 10, No. 8, pp. 1078-85, August, 1992.
`silicon
`by
`H. Toshiyoshi, H.
`Fujita,
`"Optical
`crossconnection
`micromachined torsion mirrors", Digest.
`IEEE/LEOS 1996 Summer
`Topical Meetings, pp 63-64, Keystone, CO, 5-9, Aug., 1996
`C. Marser, M.—A. Gretillat, N. F. de Rooji, et al,
`" Vertical mirrors
`fabricated
`by
`reactive
`ion
`etching
`for
`fiber
`optical
`switching
`applications", . 10”‘ IEEE
`International MEMS Workshop, pp. 349-
`54, 1997
`"
`L. A. Field, D. L. Burriesci, P. R. Robrish, R. C. Ruby,
`Mieromachined [X2 optical-fiber
`switch",
`International Solid—State
`Sensors and Actuators Conference — TRANSDUCERS '95, Stockholm,
`Sweden, 25-29 June, 1995. Sensors and Actuators A (Physical), vol.A53,
`(no.l—3):3l 1-l6,May 1996
`L. Y. Lin, S. S. Lee, K. S. J. Pister and M. C. Wu, “Micro-machined
`three—dimensiona1 rnicro-optics for integrated free-space optical system”,
`IEEE Photonic Technology Letters, Vol. 6, No. 12, December, 1994.
`S. S. Lee, L. Y. Lin, K. S. J. Pister and M. C. Wu, “ Hybrid integration of
`8x1 micromachined micro-Fresnel
`lens arrays and 8x1 vertical-cavity
`surface-emitting laser arrays for free-space optical interconnect", in Tech.
`Dig. of The 40th lntemational Electron Device Meeting (IEDM’94),
`December 11-14, 1994.
`S. S. Lee, L. Y. Lin, and M. C. Wu, “Realization of FDDI optical bypass
`switches using surface micromachining technology,” Proc. SPIE on
`Micromachining and Microfabrication, Austin, TX, Oct. 23-24, 1995
`K. S.
`J. Pister, M. W. Judy, S. R. Burgett, and R. S. Fearing,
`“Microfabricated hinges”, Sensors and Actuators A-Physical, Vol. 33, no.
`3, p. 249(1992)
`T. Akiyama and H. Fujita, “A quantitative aanalysis of scratch drive
`actuator using buckling motion", Pro.
`8”‘
`lEEEIntemational MEMS
`Workshop, pp. 310 - 315, 1995
`J. Comtois, V. Bright and M Phipps, “Thermal microactuators for
`surface-micromachining processes”, Pro. SPIE, Vol. 2642, pp. 10 -
`21.1995

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket