throbber
(12) United States Patent
`(10) Patent N0.:
`US 6,442,307 B1
`
`Carr et al.
`(45) Date of Patent:
`Aug. 27, 2002
`
`USOO6442307B1
`
`(54) SOLDER-PACKAGED OPTICAL MEMS
`211310111ch AND METHOD FOR MAKING THE
`
`(75)
`
`Inventors: Dustin W. Carr, Pittstown; Dennis S.
`Greywall, Whitehouse Station; Sungho
`Jin, Millington; Flavio Pardo, New
`Providence; Hyongsok Soh, Basking
`Rldge, all Of NJ (US)
`(73) Assignees: Lucent Technologies Inc., Murray Hill,
`NJ (US); Agere Systems Guardian
`Cor ., Orlando, FL US
`p
`(
`)
`Subject to any disclaimer, the term of this
`patent is extended or adjusted under 35
`U.S.C. 154(b) by 68 days.
`
`( * ) Notice:
`
`21 A 1. N .2 09 705 350
`')
`pp
`0
`/
`’
`(
`(22)
`Filed:
`NOV. 3, 2000
`
`7
`{'11: (3] “““““““““““““““““‘3‘85/18385/120529/62/45
`E23
`(58) Field of Search ...................... 385/14, 18; 359/245
`
`(56)
`
`References Cited
`US. PATENT DOCUMENTS
`5,444,520 A *
`8/1995 Murano ...................... 347/244
`
`..
`6,002,507 A * 12/1999 Floyd et a1.
`359/201
`
`3/2001 Greywall .............. 335/222
`6,201,631 B1 *
`............... 372/20
`6,351,577 B1 *
`2/2002 Aksyuk et al.
`* cited by examiner
`Primary ExaminergRobert H. Kim
`Assistant Examiner—George Wang
`(57)
`ABSTRACT
`In accordance with the invention, a MEMS mirror device
`comprises a mirror layer including a frame structure and at
`least one mirror movably coupled to the frame and an
`actuator la er includin at least one conductive
`ath and at
`y
`g
`.
`.
`P.
`least one electrode for mov1ng the mirror. The mirror layer
`and the actuator layer are provided With metallization pads
`and are bonded together in lateral alignment and with
`predetermined vertical gap spacing by solder bonds between
`the pads. The device has utility in optical cross connection,
`variable attenuation and power gain equalization.
`32 Claims, 12 Drawing Sheets
`
`
`
`FNC 1005
`
`

`

`US. Patent
`
`Aug. 27, 2002
`
`Sheet 1 0f 12
`
`US 6,442,307 B1
`
`
`
`

`

`US. Patent
`
`Aug. 27, 2002
`
`Sheet 2 0f 12
`
`US 6,442,307 B1
`
`
`
` INPUT/ OUTPUT
`FIBER BUNDLES
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`US. Patent
`
`Aug. 27, 2002
`
`Sheet 3 0f 12
`
`US 6,442,307 B1
`
`
`
`

`

`US. Patent
`
`Aug. 27, 2002
`
`Sheet 4 0f 12
`
`US 6,442,307 B1
`
`
`
`

`

`US. Patent
`
`Aug. 27, 2002
`
`Sheet 5 0f 12
`
`US 6,442,307 B1
`
`
`
`

`

`US. Patent
`
`Aug. 27, 2002
`
`Sheet 6 0f 12
`
`US 6,442,307 B1
`
`
`
`

`

`US. Patent
`
`Aug. 27, 2002
`
`Sheet 7 0f 12
`
`US 6,442,307 B1
`
`FIG.
`
`5A
`
`
`
`

`

`US. Patent
`
`Aug. 27, 2002
`
`Sheet 8 0f 12
`
`US 6,442,307 B1
`
`
`
`

`

`US. Patent
`
`Aug. 27, 2002
`
`Sheet 9 0f 12
`
`US 6,442,307 B1
`
`FIG.
`
`7A
`
`
`
`

`

`US. Patent
`
`Aug. 27, 2002
`
`Sheet 10 0f 12
`
`US 6,442,307 B1
`
`
`
` '
`
`
`"um—wwn.-.,..,.,
`gag—h_
`__
`__
`
`
`8080‘25 50
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`US. Patent
`
`Aug. 27, 2002
`
`Sheet 11 0f 12
`
`US 6,442,307 B1
`
`
`
`

`

`US. Patent
`
`Aug. 27, 2002
`
`Sheet 12 0f 12
`
`US 6,442,307 B1
`
`158
`
`155
`
`
`
`

`

`US 6,442,307 B1
`
`1
`SOLDER-PACKAGED OPTICAL MEMS
`DEVICE AND METHOD FOR MAKING THE
`SAME
`
`FIELD OF THE INVENTION
`
`The present invention relates to optical micro-electro-
`mechanical devices (“MEMs devices”) and, in particular, to
`MEMs devices constructed using solder bond assembly. The
`inventive MEMs devices are particularly useful as movable
`mirrors in optical communication systems.
`BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
`
`Optical MEMs devices are of considerable importance in
`optical communication systems.
`In one important
`application, a two-dimensional array of MEMs devices is
`used to provide an optical cross connect between input
`optical fibers and output optical fibers. Each MEMs device
`in the array is a movable mirror disposed to receive the
`optical signal from an input fiber. The mirror can be elec-
`trically moved to reflect
`the received optical
`input
`to a
`desired output fiber.
`A typical MEMs mirror comprises a metal-coated silicon
`mirror movably coupled to a surrounding silicon frame via
`a gimbal. Two torsional members on opposite sides of the
`mirror connect the mirror to the gimbal and define the
`mirror’s axis of rotation. The gimbal, in turn, is coupled to
`the surrounding silicon frame via two torsional members
`defining a second axis of rotation orthagonal to that of the
`mirror. A light beam can therefore be steered in any direc-
`tion.
`
`Electrodes are disposed in a cavity underlying the mirror
`and the gimbal. Voltages applied between the mirror and an
`underlying electrode and between the gimbal and an elec-
`trode control the orientation of the mirror. Alternatively, in
`slightly modified arrangements, an electrical signal can
`control the position of the mirror magnetically or piezoelec-
`trically.
`FIGS. 1(a) and 1(b) illustrate conventional optical MEMs
`devices and their application. FIG. 1(a) shows a typical prior
`art optical MEMs mirror structure. The device comprises a
`mirror 10 coupled to a gimbal 11 on a polysilicon frame 12.
`The components are fabricated on a substrate (not shown) by
`micromachining processes such as multilayer deposition and
`selective etching. After etching, mirror assembly (10, 11, 12)
`is raised above the substrate by upward bending lift arms 13
`during a release process. The mirror 10 in this example is
`double—gimbal cantilevered and attached onto the frame
`structure 12 by springs 14. The mirrors can be tilted to any
`desired orientation for optical signal routing via electrostatic
`or other actuation with electrical voltage or current supplied
`from outside. The light-reflecting surface of mirror 10
`comprises a metal coated polysilicon membrane which is
`typically of circular shape. The metal layers are deposited by
`known thin film deposition methods such as evaporation,
`sputtering, electrochemical deposition, or chemical vapor
`deposition.
`FIG. 1(b) schematically illustrates an important applica-
`tion of optical MEMs mirrors as controllable mirror arrays
`for optical signal routing. The cross connect system shown
`here comprises optical input fibers 120, optical output fibers
`121 and an array of MEMs mirrors 122 on a substrate 123.
`The optical signals from the input fibers 120 are incident on
`aligned mirrors 122. The mirrors 122, with the aid of a fixed
`auxilliary mirror 124 and appropriate imaging lenses 125,
`are electrically controlled to reflect
`the incident optical
`signals to respective output
`fibers 121.
`In alternative
`
`2
`schemes, the input fibers and the output fibers are in separate
`arrays, and a pair of MEMs mirror arrays are used to perform
`the cross connect function.
`
`The tilting of each mirror is controlled by applying
`specific electric fields to one or more of the electrodes (not
`shown) beneath the mirror. Undesirable variations in the gap
`spacing between the mirror layer and the electrode layer,
`symmetric or nonsymmetric, alter the electric field for the
`applied field, which affects the degree of electrostatic actua-
`tion and hence the degree of mirror tilting. This in turn alters
`the path or coherency of light signals reaching the receiving
`fibers, thus increasing the signal loss during beam steering.
`An array of such MEMs mirrors is essentially composed
`of two layers: a mirror layer comprising the array of mirror
`elements movably coupled to a surrounding frame and an
`actuator layer comprising the electrodes and conductive
`paths needed for electrical control of the mirrors. One
`approach to fabricating the array is to fabricate the actuator
`layer and the mirror layer as successive layers on the same
`workpiece and then to lift up the mirror layer above the
`actuator layer using vertical thermal actuators or stresses in
`thin films. This lift-up process is described in US. patent
`application Ser. No. 09/415,178 filed by V. A. Aksyuk et al.
`on Nov. 8, 1999 and assigned to applicant’s assignee.
`An alternative approach is to fabricate the mirror layer on
`one substrate, the actuator layer on a separate substrate and
`then to assemble the mating parts with accurate alignment
`and spacing. The two-part assembly process is described in
`US. Pat. No. 5,629,790 issued to Neukermans et al. on May
`13, 1997 and US. patent application Ser. No. 09/559,216
`filed by Greywall on Apr. 26, 2000, both of which are
`incorporated herein by reference. This two-part assembly
`provides a more robust structure, greater mirror packing
`density and permits larger mirror sizes and rotation angles as
`well as scalability to larger arrays.
`In the two—part assembly process, the mirror layer—and the
`actuator layer should be bonded for mechanical sturdiness
`and long-term reliability. Neukermans et al. and Greywall
`suggest anodic bonding, solder glass bonding, and epoxy
`bonding. The gap spacing between the mirror layer and the
`actuator layer determines the electric field for the given
`magnitude of applied voltage (or the magnetic field for the
`given electrical current level). Therefore, an accurate and
`reliable establishment of the gap spacing during the assem-
`bly and bonding of the two parts, as well as the dimensional
`stability of the gap during device handling, shipping and
`operation are important. The accurate lateral alignment of
`the mating parts of the mirrors and electrodes is also
`desirable for reliable operation.
`SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
`
`In accordance with the invention, a MEMs mirror device
`comprises a mirror layer including a frame structure and at
`least one mirror movably coupled to the frame and an
`actuator layer including at least one conductive path and at
`least one electrode for moving the mirror. The mirror layer
`and the actuator layer are provided with metallization pads
`and are bonded together in lateral alignment and with
`predetermined vertical gap spacing by solder bonds between
`the pads. The device has utility in optical cross connection,
`variable attenuation and power gain equalization.
`BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
`
`10
`
`15
`
`30
`
`35
`
`40
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`60
`
`65
`
`The nature, advantages and various additional features of
`the invention will appear more fully upon consideration of
`the illustrative embodiments now to be described in detail
`
`with the accompanying drawings. In the drawings:
`
`

`

`US 6,442,307 B1
`
`3
`illustrate conventional MEMs
`FIGS. 1(a) and 1(b)
`devices and their application;
`FIGS. 2(a) and 2(b) schematically illustrate a first
`embodiment of a MEMs device in accordance with the
`invention;
`FIGS. 3(a) and 3(b) illustrate steps in a first method of
`fabricating the FIG. 2 device;
`FIGS. 4(a), 4(b) and 4(6) illustrate steps in a second
`method of fabricating the device using a removable spacer;
`FIGS. 5(a) and 5(b) illustrate exemplary, removable spac-
`ers suitable for solder bond height control;
`FIGS. 6(a) and 6(b) illustrate fabricating a MEMs device
`incorporating a permanent spacer;
`FIGS. 7(a) and (b) schematically illustrate two exemplary
`embodiments of the MEMS device according to the inven-
`tion;
`FIGS. 8(a) and 8(b) illustrate additional examples of
`MEMS devices using spacers;
`FIG. 9 schematically illustrates a variable attenuator com-
`prising the optical MEMS structure according to the inven-
`tion; and
`FIG. 10 schematically illustrates an optical communica-
`tion system comprising a dynamic gain equalizer based on
`optical MEMS device according to the invention.
`It is to be understood that the drawings are for purposes
`of illustrating the concepts of the invention and are not to
`scale.
`
`DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE
`INVENTION
`
`Referring to the drawings, FIG. 2(a) illustrates an exem-
`plary optical MEMs device in accordance with the invention
`comprising a mirror layer 20 including at least one gim-
`balled mirror 21 movably coupled to the surrounding frame
`22 and a mating actuator layer 23 including at least one
`actuating electrode 24 and leads (not shown) for applying
`voltage between electrode 24 and gimballed mirror 21.
`Layers 20 and 23 are advantageously polysilicon or single
`crystal silicon. The mating surfaces of the layers are each
`provided with a plurality of wettable metallization regions
`25 and solder ball bonds 26 between metallization regions
`25. The layers are spaced apart by the solder balls 26. The
`gimballed mirror 21 can be a double-gimballed, cantilevered
`mirror and is coupled to the frame structure 22 of layer 20
`by torsion bars or springs (not shown). Hence the mirror 21
`can be tilted to any desired orientation.
`Each mirror 21 can be electrically grounded and tilted for
`optical signal routing via electrostatic actuation by one or
`more electrodes 24 placed underneath the mirror. An exem-
`plary desired size (effective diameter) of mirrors suitable for
`optical MEMs applications is in the range of 50—10000 Mm,
`preferably in the range of 200—2000/1m. The mirrors can be
`coated with a reflecting metal layer comprising Au, Ag or Al.
`The use of other metals or alloys is not precluded.
`The mirror layer 20 and the actuator layer 21 are solder
`bonded together with accurate lateral alignment and with
`accurate gap spacing. The mirror layer 20 typically com-
`prises an array of mirrors 21. The two-part structure is
`conveniently fabricated using a single-crystal silicon wafer
`fabrication process, although a polysilicon surface micro-
`machining can also be used for providing the separate mirror
`and the electrode parts. See the aforementioned U.S. patent
`application Ser. No. 09/559,216 to Greywall.
`FIG. 2(b) illustrates a two-dimensional array of such
`movable gimballed mirrors 21. The mirror elements 30 are
`
`10
`
`15
`
`30
`
`35
`
`40
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`60
`
`65
`
`4
`attached to gimballs 31 by torsion bars 32. The gimballs, in
`turn, are attached by torsion bars 33 to a frame 34 The
`mirrors can be patterned on a single layer of substrate, for
`example, an SOI (silicon-on-insulator) single crystal silicon
`wafer using conventional silicon fabrication processes such
`as lithographic patterning, chemical etching, or reactive ion
`etching. The open areas 35 between the gimballed mirrors
`can be utilized to place solder bonds as shown in FIG. 2(a).
`This solder bonded MEMs device has many processing
`and performance advantages as compared with conventional
`devices. The solder bonding, as shown herein, can provide
`highly accurate spacing of the gap between the layers 20, 23
`and facilitate highly accurate lateral alignment. Such a
`structure permits precise control of the mirrors, a more
`robust structure, greater packing density, larger mirror sizes,
`and larger mirror rotation angles than are conventionally
`obtained and easier electrical connection to the mirrors.
`
`FIGS. 3(a) and 3(b) illustrate steps in assembly of the
`optical MEMS device shown in FIG. 2(a). The mirror layer
`20 and the actuator layer 23 can be accurately laterally
`aligned, e.g., by using a micro aligner (not shown) for x-y
`positioning. The vertical gap can be accurately controlled,
`e.g., by using a z-axis position sensor and micro-positioner
`(not shown), optionally guided by camera vision sensor, or
`capacitive gap sensor. The solder bonding operation may be
`carried out while the pre-aligned lateral and vertical posi-
`tions are held in position until the solder solidification is
`completed. The thermal contraction of solder joint height is
`desirably considered in determining the z-axis gap position-
`mg.
`
`The layers 20, 23 are typically comprised of solder
`non-wettable surfaces such as silicon, silicon oxide. In order
`to make these surfaces solderable, underbump metallization
`(UBM) coatings 25 are desirable. The UBM layers for the
`optical MEMS assembly advantageously comprise at least
`one adhesion layer such as Ti or Cr with an optional CriCu
`gradient alloy layer, at least one solderable metal layer such
`as Cu or Ni, and at least one surface oxidation-resistant layer
`such as Au, Pd, Pt or Ag. The use of one or more diffusion
`barrier layers to prevent or minimize undesirable inter-layer
`metallurgical reactions is not precluded.
`The preferred thickness of the adhesion layer is in the
`range of 2—500 nm, preferably 20—200 nm. The preferred
`thickness of the solderable layer is in the range of 50—5000
`nm, preferably 100—1000 nm. The desired thickness of the
`oxidation-resistant protective layer is in the range of 10—500
`nm, preferably 20—200 nm. The UBM coatings 25 are
`typically applied to the surfaces of both the mirror layer and
`the actuation layer facing each other, at locations between
`the mirrors, Patterning of the UBM coating 25 can be done
`using known techniques such as lithography or deposition
`through shadow masks with desired pattern geometry.
`The solder alloys may be applied onto the UBM surface
`as a paste, preform or deposited film, e.g., prepared by
`sputtering, evaporation, or electrodeposition. The solder
`material is then reflowed (melted by heating) so as to form
`well-defined, near-spherical solder balls 26 as shown in FIG.
`3(a) solder bumps. Either the mirror layer, the actuator layer,
`or both contain these solder bumps.
`The mirror and the actuator layers are brought together
`into contact and heated to produce solder joints and
`mechanically attach the two parts as shown in FIG. 3(b). A
`solder flux is optionally used to aid the soldering process.
`For the optical MEMS assembly, a vapor flux such as formic
`acid carried by nitrogen or argon gas is preferred over liquid
`flux which may get trapped in tiny gaps near the mirror or
`
`

`

`US 6,442,307 B1
`
`5
`spring hinge structure. Examples of solder alloys suitable for
`the inventive assembly of the two-part optical MEMS
`devices include 37% Pb-63% Sn (by weight) eutectic solder
`(with a melting point (m.p.) of ~183° C.), high-lead 95Pb-
`5Sn solder (m.p. ~308° C.), Sn-3.5Ag (m.p. ~221° C.),
`57Bi-43Sn (mp. ~139° C.), 95$n-58b (mp. ~245° C.),
`49Sn-51In (mp. ~137° C.), and 80Au-20Sn (mp. ~280° C.).
`The gap spacing between the mirror layer 20 and the
`actuator layer 23 is important for reproducible actuation of
`the optical MEMS mirrors. As an alternative to mechanical
`positioning and soldering, the spacing may be controlled by
`careful selection of solder volume applied onto each UBM
`pad, the area of the pad, the weight applied over the top of
`the assembly during the soldering, and the temperature and
`time of soldering. Larger volume, smaller pad area, smaller
`weight applied, and lower soldering temperature tend to
`produce taller solder joints. The solder joints so produced
`typically exhibit a truncated sphere shape.
`One may approximate the relation between vertical gap
`spacing and solder volume by assuming that the solder joint
`has the form of a sphere of radius R truncated at the planes
`of contact with the metallization pads. In an exemplary
`device we may assume that the diameter of the circle of
`contact (plane of truncation) is approximately the height of
`the joint, then the joint height h=V2R. The joint height h can
`then be correlated to the volume of the truncated solder
`
`(0.884X4/3TI3R3) with a ratio V2R/(3.701R3). Thus by con—
`trolling the volume of the solder on the metallization pads,
`the joint height can be controlled. The soldering process
`onto mating pad areas has a self aligning effect due to the
`surface tension of molten solder and the driving force to
`reduce the surface energy of the molten solder at the joint.
`The mirror layer above and the actuator layer below are thus
`pulled together while the mating pads are automatically
`laterally aligned. For even more accurate lateral alignment,
`supplemental mechanical alignment may optionally be
`employed, e.g., by utilizing alignment of notches, edges or
`corners against fixed-positioned notches or steps in the
`assembly.
`The attainable accuracy in the vertical gap spacing in the
`inventive solder assembly is with less than 110% variation
`from the preferred nominal spacing, preferably with less
`than 15% variation, and even more preferably with less than
`12.5% variation. For example, 600 um diameter mirrors may
`operate with a mirror-electrode spacing of 60 um The
`attainable variation from this 60 gm spacing is less than 16
`,urn, preferable less than 13 um, even more preferably less
`than 11.5 ,um. The lateral alignment of mirror position vs
`electrode position is also critical as a deviation from desired
`alignment may lead to an undesirable deviation in the
`intensity of electrostatic (or magnetic) actuation of the
`MEMS device. The attainable lateral alignment
`in the
`inventive, solder-packaged optical MEMS device is with an
`accuracy of within 15%, preferably within 11% of the
`effective mirror diameter. The effective mirror diameter of a
`
`non-circular mirror is the diameter of a circle having the
`same area as the mirror.
`
`FIGS. 4(a), 4(b) and 4(6) schematically illustrate the use
`of a removable spacer 40 to further enhance the accuracy of
`the gap spacing in a solder-assembled,
`two-part optical
`MEMS device. With spacer 40, an accuracy of within 15%,
`preferably within 12.5% of a desired gap spacing can be
`obtained. In FIG. 4(a),
`the UBMs and solder bumps are
`provided on selected sites of between-mirror spaces with
`certain regular or irregular intervals. A removable spacer
`assembly is prepared with a pre-determined height
`(or
`thickness), desirably with less than 11% and preferably with
`less than 10.5% deviation from the target spacing.
`
`10
`
`15
`
`30
`
`35
`
`40
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`60
`
`65
`
`6
`FIG. 4(1)) shows the mirror layer 20 laterally aligned with
`the actuator layer 23 and placed on the movable spacers 40
`to provide accurate vertical spacing. The assembly is then
`heated to solder the layers 20, 23 together.
`After soldering, the removable spacers 40 are removed
`(physically or by etching), leaving the structure shown in
`FIG. 4(6).
`The removable spacer is preferably an assembly 50 of a
`periodic and parallel array of spacers 40. FIGS. 5(a) and 5(b)
`illustrate exemplary assemblies 50 with connecting ends 51.
`With such assemblies, a connecting end 51 can be cut and
`using the other connecting end, the spacers 40 can be pulled
`out
`in a linear
`fashion without disturbing any of the
`mechanically fragile mirrors.
`The spacer assembly 50 is placed over the actuator layer
`23 which already contains solder bumps at specific sites. The
`location of each of the spacers 40 is selected in such a way
`that they do not overlap with the existing solder bumps. The
`mirror layer 20 is then placed above the removable spacer
`assembly, laterally aligned with respect to the actuator layer.
`Then the entire assembly is heated and solder bonded while
`a weight or pressure is optionally being applied so that the
`solder height turns out to be exactly the same as the spacer
`height. Even in the absence of the applied pressure, the
`solder surface tension can be utilized to vertically pull the
`mirror and the electrode layer closer until they both touch
`the removable spacer.
`After the soldering operation, one edge of the spacer
`assembly is cut off, and the spacers are mechanically pulled
`out,
`leaving the final configuration of FIG. 4(c).
`Alternatively, although less preferable, the spacers can be
`chemically etched away or burned away if the spacer mate-
`rial is chosen such that the etching or burning process does
`not damage the mirror and associated components.
`Solder alloys generally exhibit very high coeffecient of
`thermal expansion (CTE), especially those containing a
`large percentage of Pb or In. The CTE values of solder alloys
`can be as high as 23—28X10'6/degree C as compared to
`~4x10'6/degree C for Si, ~13x10‘6/degree C for nickel, and
`~18x10’6/degree C for copper alloys. If the spacers of FIG.
`4 have a much lower CTE value than the solder contracts,
`then the spacers advantageously should be removed after the
`soldering operation is completed. Repeated changes in tem-
`perature environment during service, storage or shipping of
`the packaged optical MEMS devices might otherwise result
`in a premature fatigue failure of the solder joints.
`The solidification shrinkage combined with the generally
`greater thermal contraction of the solder joint material as
`compared to the thermal contraction of the spacer material
`may result in a trapping of the spacer. In order to allow an
`easy removal of the spacer by horizontal pull out without
`seriously disturbing or damaging the delicate mirror and
`associated structures, one or more of the following
`approaches can be utilized.
`1. The spacer can be made up of round or oval crosssec-
`tioned wires with minimal contact with the upper mirror
`layer and the lower electrode layer, and be coated with
`low-friction-coeffecient material such as a fluorocarbon, a
`diamond or diamond-like-carbon film so that the mechanical
`pulling out of the spacer becomes easier.
`2. The spacer can be made of a round tube material with
`a hollow core instead of solid wire material so that the spacer
`material has some vertical compliancy and is more easily
`removed by horizontal pulling.
`3. The spacer can be made of fine metallic tubes with a
`round or preferably an oval crosssection into which finer,
`
`

`

`US 6,442,307 B1
`
`7
`round wires are inserted. When the soldering operation is
`completed, the inner round wires are pulled out first, which
`will then make the tube collapse into an oval shape with less
`height than the solder joint height. This allows easy removal
`of the remaining spacer frame material.
`4. The material used for the spacer can be selected so that
`it has higher CTE value than the solder material used, and
`of course substantially higher melting point than that for the
`solder. On cooling to room temperature (or to even below
`room temperature if necessary) after soldering operation, the
`spacer then thermally contracts more than the solder joint
`height, loosens, and is easily removed. The desired CTE
`value for such thermal-contraction-removable spacer mate-
`rial is at least 10% higher, preferably at least 25% higher
`than the CTE of the particular solder used for the packaging.
`For example, an aluminum based alloy spacer with a CTE of
`~23x10'6/degree C can be utilized if the solder used is 57%
`Bi—43% Sn eutectic solder with the CTE of ~17.5><10‘6/
`degree C, a magnesium-based alloy spacer with CTE values
`of ~26x10‘6/degree C can be utilized if the solder used is
`Sn-3.5% Ag eutectic with a CTE of 23x10‘5/degree C, and
`a Zn-1% Cu alloy spacer with a CTE of ~35x10'5/degree C
`may be utilized if 37Pb-6SSn eutectic solder with a CTE of
`~25x10'fi/degree C is used. The Bi—Sn solders with high Bi
`contents have a unique and advantageous behavior of
`expanding upon solidifacation thus making the removal of
`the spacer easier. The desired high CTE spacer material does
`not have to be restricted to metallic materials. For example,
`a spacer of the type shown in FIG. 5(a) or 5(b) may be made
`of a polyimide, thermosetting epoxy or other plastic material
`which remains stable at the typical soldering temperature of
`100—300° C., and exhibit high CTE of often greater than
`50x10'6/degree C and consequently a large thermal
`contraction, thus allowing easy removal of the spacer after
`soldering operation. 5. The spacer can be made of a shape
`memory alloy such as the equiatomic Ni—Ti alloy, and
`alloys in general which undergo phase transformation and
`associated volume change near room temperature heating
`and cooling. The crosssection of the wire part of the shape
`memory spacer is made to have a collapsed oval shape at
`room temperature, which is converted to a taller crosssection
`by phase transformation when heated to the soldering
`temperature, which then returns to the original lower height
`when cooled back to room temperature. This allows easy
`removal from the solder-bonded optical MEMS package.
`FIGS. 6(a) and 6(1)) illustrate an alternative embodiment
`of the invention where the gap-defining spacer can be a
`permanent drop—in spacer 60 which is permanently left
`inside the solder-bonded optical MEMS package. In this
`case, the coefficients of thermal expansion (CTEs) of the
`spacer material and the solder material are carefully
`matched. Conveniently, the permanent spacer 60 is simply
`dropped-in into the gap and laterally aligned just prior to the
`soldering operation, and the spacer removal step can be
`omitted. Advantageously, the actuator layer 23 can be pro-
`vided with notches 61 to facilitate lateral alignment of the
`spacer 60.
`An important and preferred configuration of a drop-in
`(permanent) spacer 60 simultaneously incorporates aerody-
`namic isolation for of each mirror in the array. The move-
`ment of one mirror, for example, electrostatically actuated
`tilting for optical signal re-routing, can disturb or cause the
`movement of adjacent mirrors. The drop-in spacer is pref-
`erably configured so that the boundary area between adja-
`cent mirrors is compartmented or blocked as much as
`possible. Blockage may be defined as the proportion of the
`360° periphery underlying the mirrors that is blocked off by
`
`8
`the spacer. The preferred blockage is 011 the average, with at
`least 20%, preferably 50%, even more preferably 80% of the
`total boundary wall area. After solidification of the bonding
`solder, the gap spacing between the mirror and the electrode
`layer is dictated by the pre-set
`thickness of the drop-in
`spacer. The relative adjustment of CTE values of the spacer
`and the solder by suitable materials selection in combination
`with the consideration of solidifacation shrinkage or expan—
`sion involved can be utilized to lock the spacer in place as
`shown in FIG. 6(b), yet without excessive stresses, espe-
`cially tensile stresses, induced into the solder joints.
`Aspacer usefiil for the structure of FIG. 6 can be made of
`elemental metals, alloys, ceramics, silicon or polymer. The
`CTE matching of the permanent drop-in spacer to that of the
`solder used is important in avoiding fatigue failure of solder
`joints on thermal cycling caused by ambient temperature
`changes or assembly/test process. In the inventive solder—
`packaged optical MEMS device,
`the CTE of the spacer
`material
`is preferably closely matched with that of the
`solder, with the difference being desirably less than 120%,
`preferably less than 110%, even more preferably less than
`15% of the solder CTE. For example, if the solder used is the
`37Pb-635n eutectic solder with a CTE of ~25x10'6/degree
`C, the spacer material can be made of aluminum with a CTE
`of 23.6x10'6/degree C or a magnesium alloy (Mg-9%
`Al-1% Zn) with a CTE of 26.1x10'6/degree C. In general,
`alloy compositions containing Al, Zn, Mg, Pb, In, or Cu can
`be made to exhibit CTE values comparable to those of the
`commonly used solder alloys.
`Alternatively, the spacer can be locked in place before the
`soldering operation by fixturing or attaching onto part of the
`overall device structure. FIG. 7(a) illustrates an embodiment
`of the invention wherein a pre-attaehed spacer 70 is pat-
`terned and bonded onto one of the mating parts, e.g., either
`on the mirror layer or the actuator layer. These spacers are
`to be permanently left in the packaged structure. The pre-
`attached spacers 70 are desirably configured so that the
`boundary area between adjacent mirrors is compartmented
`or blocked as much as possible. The preferred blockage is on
`the average, with at least 20%, preferably 50%, even more
`preferably 80% of the total boundary wall area. The solder
`bumps are separately added for bonding purpose. The spacer
`thickness again accurately defines the gap spacing between
`the mirror and the electrode during the soldering operation.
`The preferred accuracy of these pre—attached spacers is
`within less than 15%, more preferably less than 12.5%
`deviation from the desired gap spacing. The pre-attached
`spacer 70 can be made of a metal, silicon, ceramic, poly—
`imide or plastic material. Plastic materials tend to outgas in
`a hermetically sealed atmosphere, and also have generally
`higher CTE values, thus are less preferred than inorganic
`materials such as metals, ceramics or silicon materials.
`In FIG. 7(a), the mating faces of the mirror layer 20A and
`the actuator layer 23 are both in planar configuration, and the
`spacer is added after the mirror layer 20 with movable
`mirrors 21 is fabricated. The movable mirrors are preferably
`made of silicon, and is typically only several micrometers
`thick. In this embodiment the mirror layer 20A is fabricated
`on a silicon-on-insulator substrate comprising a first layer of
`silicon 71, a layer of SiO2 72 and a second layer of silicon
`73. The thin silicon mirror can be made using the well-
`known silicon-on-insulator (SOI) fabrication process. The
`501 process permits convenient fabrication of the thin
`silicon mirrors 21, and the presence of the buried oxide layer
`72 is useful as an etch-stop barrier. In FIG. 7(a), selected
`patterned areas of the upper portion 73 of the SOI substrate
`20A are etched, e.g., by using chemical etch, reactive-ion
`
`10
`
`15
`
`30
`
`35
`
`40
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`60
`
`65
`
`

`

`US 6,442,307 B1
`
`9
`etch, or a combination of these processes to form the mirror
`array. The gimbals and the torsion bars (not shown) are also
`formed around each mirror. The $01 material and process
`are described, for example,
`in Concise Encyclopedia of
`Selnicondacting [Materials and Related Technologies, Edited
`by S. Mahajan and L. C. Kimmerling, Pergamon Press, New
`York, 1992, p. 466.
`Since the movable mirror is typically thin and

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket