`571-272-7822
`
`
`
`
`
`Paper 11
`Entered: April 13, 2015
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`SERVICENOW, INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`HEWLETT-PACKARD, CO.,
`Patent Owner.
`
`
`Case IPR2015-00699 (Patent 7,610,512)
`Case IPR2015-00702 (Patent 7,890,802)
`Case IPR2015-00717 (Patent 7,027,411)
`Case IPR2015-00718 (Patent 8,224,683) 1
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Before JAMES B. ARPIN and BARBARA A. PARVIS, Administrative
`Patent Judges.
`
`PARVIS, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`
`ORDER
`Granting Petitioner’s Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of
`Mark R. Weinstein
`37 C.F.R. § 42.10
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1 This Order applies to each of the listed cases. We exercise our discretion
`to issue one Order to be docketed in each case. The parties, however, are
`not authorized to use this caption for any subsequent papers.
`
`
`
`
`
`IPR2015-00699 (Patent 7,610,512), IPR2015-00702 (Patent 7,890,802),
`IPR2015-00717 (Patent 7,027,411), and IPR2015-00718 (Patent 8,224,683)
`
`
`
`Petitioner, ServiceNow, Inc., moves for pro hac vice admission of Mr.
`
`Mark R. Weinstein. IPR2015-00699, Paper 8; IPR2015-00702, Paper 8;
`
`IPR2015-00717, Paper 9; IPR2015-00718, Paper 9. Petitioner provides
`
`affidavits from Mr. Weinstein in support of its motions. IPR2015-00699,
`
`Ex. 1014; IPR2015-00702, Ex. 1010; IPR2015-00717, Ex. 1007; IPR2015-
`
`00718, Ex. 1008. Patent Owner, Hewlett-Packard, Co., has not filed an
`
`opposition to Petitioner’s motions.
`
`Based on the facts set forth in the motions and the accompanying
`
`affidavits from Mr. Weinstein, we conclude that Mr. Weinstein has
`
`sufficient legal and technical qualifications to represent Petitioner in these
`
`cases, that Mr. Weinstein has demonstrated the necessary familiarity with
`
`the subject matter of these cases, and that there is a need for Petitioner to
`
`have counsel with experience as a litigation attorney in patent matters
`
`involved in these cases. Accordingly, Petitioner has established good cause
`
`for Mr. Weinstein’s pro hac vice admission. Mr. Weinstein will be
`
`permitted to appear pro hac vice in these cases as back-up counsel only. See
`
`37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c).
`
`In consideration of the foregoing, it is hereby:
`
`ORDERED that Petitioner’s motions for pro hac vice admission of
`
`Mr. Mark R. Weinstein are granted, and Mr. Weinstein is authorized to
`
`represent Petitioner as back-up counsel in these cases;
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner continue to have a registered
`
`practitioner as lead counsel in these cases;
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that Mr. Weinstein comply with the Office
`
`Patent Trial Practice Guide and the Board’s Rules of Practice for Trials, as
`
`2
`
`
`
`IPR2015-00699 (Patent 7,610,512), IPR2015-00702 (Patent 7,890,802),
`IPR2015-00717 (Patent 7,027,411), and IPR2015-00718 (Patent 8,224,683)
`
`set forth in Title 37, Part 42 of the Code of Federal Regulations;
`
`
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that Mr. Weinstein is subject to the Office’s
`
`disciplinary jurisdiction under 37 C.F.R. § 11.19(a), and to the USPTO
`
`Rules of Professional Conduct set forth in 37 C.F.R. §§ 11.101 et seq.; and
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that Paper 6 in IPR2015-00699, Paper 6 in
`
`IPR2015-00702, Paper 7 in IPR2015-00717, and Paper 7 in IPR2015-00718
`
`are expunged.
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`IPR2015-00699 (Patent 7,610,512), IPR2015-00702 (Patent 7,890,802),
`IPR2015-00717 (Patent 7,027,411), and IPR2015-00718 (Patent 8,224,683)
`
`
`PETITIONER:
`
`Heidi L. Keefe
`Andrew C. Mace
`COOLEY LLP
`hkeefe@cooley.com
`amace@cooley.com
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`
`Joseph F. Haag
`Jason Kipnis
`WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE AND DORR LLP
`Joseph.Haag@wilmerhale.com
`Jason.Kipnis@wilmerhale.com
`
`4