throbber
II 1111111111111
`
`US005714520A
`[11] Patent Number:
`[451 Date of Patent:
`
`5,714,520
`Feb.3, 1998
`
`United States Patent [19]
`Jones et al.
`
`[54] PROPOFOL COMPOSTION CONTAINING
`EDETATE
`
`[75]
`
`Inventors: Christopher Buchan Jones. Prestbury;
`John H-enry Platt. Congleton. both of
`United Kingdom
`
`[73] Assignee: Zeneca Limited. London. United
`Kingdom
`
`[21] Appl. No.: 408,707
`
`[22] Filed:
`
`Mar. 22, 1995
`
`[30]
`
`Foreign AppliC1ltioo Priority Data
`
`Mar. 22, 1994 [GB) Ua..ited Kingdom ................... 9405593
`Int. CL 6
`.................. ................................... A61K 31/&5
`[51]
`[52] U.S. CI ............................................................... 514/731
`[58] F1eld of Search ............................................... 514n31
`
`[56]
`
`References Cited
`
`U.S. PATENT DOCUMENfS
`
`Re. 32,393
`3,334,545
`4,056,635
`4,452,817
`4,567,161
`4,798,846
`
`4/1987 Wretlind et al ......................... 514/219
`5/1968 Aidlo et al ............................... 167/81
`11/1977 Glen eta!. .............................. 424/346
`6/1984 Glen et al ............................... 4241346
`1/1986 Posa.oski ct al . .......................... 514123
`1/1989 Glen et al .
`.............................. 5141731
`
`FOREIGN PATENT DOCUMENI'S
`
`220152
`0372331
`0572190
`4281835
`930069
`1472793
`
`4/1987
`6/1990
`12/1993
`7/1992
`6/1993
`5/1977
`
`European Pat. Off ..
`Ewopea.n Pat. Off ..
`European Pat. Off ..
`Japan.
`South Africa .
`United Kingdom .
`
`OfHER PUBUCATIONS
`
`Russell et al .. Ethylenediaminetetra-acetic acid. Inhibition
`and Destruction of the Microbial Cell. 1971. pp. 209-224.
`Chew et al .. In Vitro Growth Inhibition of Mastitis Causing
`Bacteria by Phenolics and Metal Chelators. Journal of Dairy
`Science, 1985.68.pp.3037-3046.
`Morita et al.. The Effects of Copper and EIJfA on the
`Autoxidation of Phospholipid Emulsions. Agr. Bioi. Chem..
`1972. vol. 36. No.7. pp. 1163-1167.
`Hart et al. Chelating Agents as Preservative Potentiators.
`Cosmetic and Drug Preservation: Principles and Practice.
`Chapter 18. 1985, pp. 323-337.
`Postsurgical Infections Associated with an Extrinsically
`Contaminated Intravenous Anesthetic Agent -California.
`Dlinois. Maine. and Michigan. 1990. Morbidity and Mor(cid:173)
`tality Weekly Report (MMR). Jun. 29. 1990. pp. 426-427.
`433.
`Trissel, Handbook on Injectable Drugs. 1994. 8th Edition.
`pp. 63, 115. 125-127. 133. 269. 308. 314-316. 318-319.
`484-485.536-537.590-591.612-613.687-689.722-723.
`664-665.770-771.815.902-903.920-921.934-935. 1007.
`1104.
`Nakamura et al .. Direct Vasoconstrictor And Vasodilator
`Effects Of Propofolln Isolated Dog Arteries, British Journal
`of Anaesthesia. Feb. 1992. pp. 193-197.
`
`Patel et al .. Dosodium Salt Of EDTA As An Antimicrobial
`Agent. Indian Journal of Pharmacy. May. 1995, pp.
`147-148.
`Mouton et al .. Effect Of I.V. Anaethesia With Propofol On
`Drug Distribution And Metabolism In The Dog. B-ritish
`Journal of Aoaethesia. Jan. 1991. pp. 66-72.
`Chemical Abslract No. 113:84881. Morita et al .. Ophthalmic
`Solutions Containg Benzalkonium Chloride. P-hydroxyben(cid:173)
`zoate Esters and Chelating Agents. Sep. 3. 1990.
`Derwent Publication Absttact JP2096515. Apr .. 1990.
`Patent Abstracts of Japan No. JPA 02096515. Apr .• 1990.
`Russell. Effect of Magnesium Ions and Ethylenediamine
`Tetra-acetic Acid on the Activity of Vancomycin against
`Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus. 1967. J. appl.
`Bact.. 30. 395-401.
`Bennett et al .. Postoperative Infections Traced to Contami(cid:173)
`nation of an Intravenous Anesthetic. Propofol. The New
`England Journal of Medicine. Jul.. 1995. pp. 147-154.
`Simmons. CDC Guidelines for the Prevention and Control
`of Nosocomial Infections; Guidelines for prevention of
`intravascular infection. American Journal of Infection Con(cid:173)
`trol. Oct.. 1983. pp. 183-193.
`Crocker et al.. Microbial Growth Comparisons of Five
`Conunercial Parenteral
`lipid Emulsions. Journal of
`Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition. 1984. pp. 391-395.
`D' Angio et al .. The Growth of Microorganisms in Total
`Parenteral Nutrition Admixtures. Journal of Parenteral and
`Enteral Nutrition. 1987. pp. 394-397.
`Melly et al. Microbial Growth in Lipid Emulsions Used in
`Parenteral Nutrition. Arch Surg. 1975. pp. 1479-1481.
`Gilbert et al.. Microbial Growth Patterns in a Total
`Parenteral Nutrition Formulation Containing Lipid Emul(cid:173)
`sion. Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition. 1986. pp.
`99.494-497.
`Thompson et al .. Infection Control of Parenteral Nutrition
`Solutions. Nutrition in Clinical Practice. Apr. 1991. pp.
`49-54.
`Grier et al .. So Much Writing. So Little Science: A Review
`of 37 Years of Literature on Edetate Sodium Chelation
`Therapy. The Annals of Pharmacotherapy, Dec .. 1993. pp.
`1504-1509.
`Haque and Russell. Effect of Ethylenediaminetelraacetic
`Acid and Related Chelating Agents on Whole Cells of
`Gram-Negative Bacteria. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemo(cid:173)
`therapy. May. 1974, pp. 447-452.
`
`(List continued on next page.)
`
`Primary Emminer-William R.A. Jarvis
`Anome~ Agent, or Film-Cushman Darby & Cushman
`Intellectual Property Group of Pillsbury Madison & Sutro.
`LLP
`
`[57]
`
`ABSTRACT
`
`Sterile pharmaceutical compositions for parenteral admin(cid:173)
`istration containing 2.6-diisopropy1phenol (propofol) are
`described for use as anesthetics. The compositions comprise
`an oil-in-water emulsion of propotol additionally containing
`a amount of edetate sufficient to prevent significant growth
`of microorganisms for at least 24 hours after adventitious.
`extrinsic contamination.
`
`39 Claims, No Drawings
`
`Dr. Reddy's Laboratories
`v.
`Fresenius Kabi USA, LLC
`U.S. Patent No. 8,476,010
`Exhibit 1014
`
`Exh. 1014
`
`

`
`5,714,520
`Page2
`
`OTHER PUBUCATIONS
`
`Haque and Russell. Effect of Chelating Agents on the
`Susceptiblity of Some Strains of Gram-Negative Bacteria to
`Some Antibacterial Agents. Antimicrobial Agents and Ch~
`motherapy. Aug. 1974. pp. 200-206.
`Russell. Modification of the Bacterial Cell Envelope and
`Enhancement of Antibiotic Susceptibility. Olapter of The
`Control of Antibiotic-Resistant Bacteria. Academic Press.
`1982. pp. 119-165.
`Hart. EDT A-Type Chelating Agents in Personal Care Prod(cid:173)
`ucts. Cosmetics & Toiletries. Apr. 1983. pp. 54-58.
`Hart. Chelating agents in cosm etic and toiletry products.
`Cosmetics & Toiletries. Dec. 1978. pp. 28-30.
`Hart. EUfA-Type Chelating Agents in Everyday Consumer
`Products: Some Medicinal and Personal Care Products.
`Journal of Chemical Education. Dec. 1984. pp. 1060-1061.
`Kabara. GRAS antimicrobial agents for cosmetic products.
`J. Soc. Cosmet Chern.. Jan./Feb. 1980. pp. 1-10.
`Kraniak ct al .. Effect of Ethylcnediamioctctraacetic Acid
`(EDTA) and Metal ions on Growth of Staphylococcus
`aureus 196E in Culture Media. Journal of Food Science.
`1988. pp. 910-913.
`Bhagat et aL Growth response of Pseudomonas stutzeri
`RS34 to ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) and its
`interaction with zinc. Indian Journal of Experimental Biol(cid:173)
`ogy. Jul. 1993. pp. 590-594.
`
`Houben et al .• C()ntrolling Growth of Streptococcus faecium
`in a Ham Model with Heat and Ethylenediamine Tetraacetic
`Acid. Tertiary butylhydroquinone or Nisin. Meat Science.
`1985. pp. 205-215.
`Trissel. Handbook of Injectable Drugs. 1994. pp. 381-383.
`Martindale's Pharmacopeia. 1993. p. 681.
`U.S. Data Sheet for Edetate Disodium. 1990.
`Professional Information Brochure. DIPRIVAN (propofol)
`Injection. Emulsion For IV Administration. Rev L Oct.
`1994.
`Parenteral Preparations. British Pharmacopoeia 1993. vol.
`n. PP· 746-747.
`The Pharmaceutical CODEX. Principles and Practice of
`Pharmaceutics. 1\velfth Edition. pp. 102-103. 1992.
`The United States Pharmacopeia. The National Formulary.
`1995. pp. 1650-1652: 1733-1735; 1681.
`Trissel. Handbook of Injectable Drugs. 1994. pp. 464-465.
`558-559. 593-9 and 662-663.
`Shooter et al .. Mineral Requirements for Growth of Staphy(cid:173)
`lococcus Pyrogenes. Effect of Magnesium and Calcium
`Ions. The British Journal of Experimental Pathology. 1955.
`pp. 341-350.
`Sack et al .. Factors Affecting The Production of Staphylo(cid:173)
`coagulase in a Chemically Defined Medium. The Ohio
`Journal of Science. Sep .• 1963. pp. 232-240.
`
`Exh. 1014
`
`

`
`5,714,520
`
`1
`PROPOFOL COMPOSTION CONTAINING
`EDETATE
`
`The present invention relates to 2.6-diisopropylphenol.
`known as propofol. and in particular to new pharmaceutical
`compositions containing propofol.
`Propofol is an injectable anaesthetic which has hypnotic
`properties and can be used to induce and maintain general
`anaesthesia and for sedation for example in Intensive Care
`Units. Propofol is a highly successful anaesthetic and is
`marketed under the trademark 'Diprivan' for use in treating
`humans and under the trademark 'Rapinovet' for veterinary
`use.
`Injectable anaesthetics., such as propofol, are adminis(cid:173)
`tered directly into the blood stream. This gives rise to a rapid
`onset of anaesthesia influenced almost entirely by the rate at
`which the anaesthetic agent crosses the blood-brain barrier.
`It is therefore necessary for the anaesthetic agent to have
`sufficient lipid solubility to be able to cross lh.is barrier and
`depress the relevant mechanisms of the brain. However 20
`highly lipid soluble molecules are generally poorly soluble
`in water and thus are difficult to formulate for intravenous
`injection. In some cases it may be possible to obtain a water
`soluble salt of the anaesthetic agent which releases a lipid
`soluble free base in vivo. This is not possible in many cases 2S
`and. despite considerable research. it did not prove to be
`feasible with propofol. Thus it was necessary to conduct
`very substantial research and development into the formu(cid:173)
`lation of propofol in order to obtain pharmaceutical com(cid:173)
`positions for administration to warm-blooded animals 30
`includin.g humans.
`The p resent applicants identified the anaesthetic proper(cid:173)
`ties of propofol and filed UK patent application no l3739n4
`which was granted as United Kingdom Patent 1472793.
`Corresponding patents have been granted in the USA (U.S. 3S
`Pat. Nos. 4,056.635. 4.452.817 and 4.798.846) and many
`other territories.
`1bis patent claims inter alia a sterile pharmaceutical
`composition which comprises propofol in association with a
`sterile pharmaceutically-acceptable diluent or carrier the 40
`composition being suitable either directly or after dilution
`with a liquid diluent for parenteral administration to a
`warm-blooded animal.
`In one aspect. UK 1472793 described the composition as
`preferably aqueous with propofol in sterile admixture with
`water aod a surfactant or other solubilising agent. Io another
`aspect the composition was described as aqueous with
`propofol in sterile admixture with water and an additional
`water-miscible, non-aqueous solvent. In a further aspect the
`composition was described as an oil-in-water emulsion in
`whlch propofol , either alone or dissolved in a water(cid:173)
`immiscible solvent. is emulsified with water by means of a
`surfactant. In yet a further aspect the composition was
`described as a sterile solid or semi-solid mixture of propofol
`with a s<>lid diluent. for example lactose. saccharin sodium
`or a cydodextran which composition is suitable for dilution
`with a sterile aqueous diluent.
`The patent describes many particular Examples of inject(cid:173)
`able compositions containing propofol including Examples
`with various surfactants. various solubilising agents. addi(cid:173)
`tional solvents. additional constituents (selected from
`stabilisers. preservatives and antioxidants). buffering agents
`and tonicity modifiers.
`The present applicants conducted a wide range of studies
`to determine which type of formulation would be most
`appropriate for development to provide a formulation for
`marketing. After considerable effort a formulation of pro.-
`
`2
`pofol and the surfactant Cremophor EL (Cremophoc is a
`trade mark for a polyoxyethylene castor oil derivative) in
`water was selected. Cremophor EL was used as the carrier
`to solubilise the existing intravenous anaesthetic
`s alphaxalone/alphadolone ('Althesin') and a modified form
`of Cremophor was used as the carrier to solubilise the
`intravenous anaesthetic propanidid ('Epontol').
`The present applicants conducted a detailed series of
`studies in animals and ultimately administered the fonnu-
`10 lation to over 1000 humans. However. after about five m six
`years. anaphylactoid reactions wa:e reported in a very small
`number of patients. Anaphylactoid reactions are allergic(cid:173)
`type reactions. It was not clear that Cremophor EL bad
`caused the anaphylactoid reactions in all instances but the
`15 present applicants concluded that an alternative formulation
`of propofol would have to be found and developed.
`A substantial amount of work on alternative formulations
`was performed and an oil-in-water emulsion was eventually
`selected for development. This was developed and in 1986
`was launched in a number of markets under the trade mark
`'Diprivan'. Since then this formulati on has been launched in
`many markets throughout the world and propofol is highly
`successful being regarded by anaesthetists as a drug of great
`merit having unique qualities. In summary propofol is a
`short-acting anaesthetic. suitable for both induction and
`maintenance of general anaesthesia. for sedation to Sllpple-
`ment regional analgesic techniques. for sedation of venti(cid:173)
`lated patients receiving intensive care and for conscious
`sedation for surgical and diagnostic procedures in Intensive
`Care Units. Propofol may be administered by single or
`repeated intraven<>us bolus injections or by continuous infu-
`sion. It is very rapidly removed from the blood stream and
`metabolised. Thus the depth of anaesthesia is easily con(cid:173)
`trolled and patient recove:cy on discontinuing the drug is
`usually rapid and the patient is often significantly more clear
`beaded as compared to after administration of other anaes-
`thetics. Side-effects such as nausea and vomiting occur
`significantly less frequently following administration of
`propofol than following other general anaesthetic techniques
`such as with inhalational anaesthetics.
`The present applicants have considered extending the
`range of propofol formulations in order to give the anaes(cid:173)
`thetist a wider armamentariwu from which to select an
`appropriate drug. For example applicants have developed. as
`45 an alternative. an oil-in-water emulsion formulation of pro(cid:173)
`pofol wherein the concentration of propofol is twice that of
`the presently marketed drug.
`In considering appropriate further formulations it is
`desirable to maintain the qualities that make 'Diprivan' of
`so such merit, such as those aforementioned and provide a
`formulation with acceptable chemical and physical stability
`and which is readily manipulable by the anaesthetist or
`Intensive Care Unit (ICU) specialist.
`An increasing proportion of the usage of 'Diprivao • is in
`ss the sedation of seriously ill patients particularly in Intensive
`Care Units and the like. In the sedation of such seriously ill
`patients administration of 'Diprivan' is typically by means
`of infusion. 1bis requires the use of a 'giving set', which
`involves the linkage of a reservoir (typically a vial or
`60 syringe) of propofol. via appropriate tubing. to a luer con(cid:173)
`nector and thence to a needle positioned in the patient's vein.
`Microbial contamination of parenteral fluids used in
`'giving sets' of this type has been recognised as one of many
`causes of nosocomial infection amongst ICU patients.
`6S Accordingly. for example in the USA. the general require(cid:173)
`ments of the Federal Food and Drug Administration (FDA)
`are that such 'giving sets' are changed frequently and in the
`
`Exh. 1014
`
`

`
`5,714,520
`
`3
`case of 'Ditxivan'. it is required that the 'giving sets' are
`changed at least every 6 or 12 hours dependent on the
`presentation being used.
`Intensive Care environments are busy and. as in other
`parts of the health services. there are pressures for cost(cid:173)
`containment. The changing of 'giving sets' at least every 6
`or 12 hours is relatively tim.e-conswning for the highly
`skilled ICU nurse. Intensive Care Specialist or anaesthetist.
`This would particularly be the case when a number of
`seriously ill patients in an ICU are being infused at the same
`time.
`Therefore. the applicants have sought to develop a new
`formulation of propofol which would enable 'giving sets' to
`be changed significantly less frequently (for example every
`24 hours). This would be much more convenient for the
`nurse. Intensive Care Specialist or anaesthetist; would lower
`the pressure on staff. would result in fewer manipulations of
`'giving sets' and may contribute to cost-saving in the ICU
`environment.
`We have conducted substantial research and have found
`that the addition of s.mall amounts of a selected agent to
`'Diprivan' will enable the formulation to be administered in
`'giving sets' that require changing significantly less fre(cid:173)
`quently than is presently the case; in other words the time for
`administration and time between changes of the giving sets
`has been significantly imp£oved. This increase in such times
`enables packs of increased size to be administered. increas(cid:173)
`ing convenience for the users. deaeasing wastage of 'Ditxi(cid:173)
`van ' and contributing to cost-containment.
`Furthermore. in the unlikely event of mishandling lead(cid:173)
`ing to accidental extrinsic contamination. the formulation
`will minimise the chance of miaobial growth.
`Our own UK Patent 1472793 discloses !hat formulations
`of propofol may optionally contain one or more additional
`constituents selected from stabilisers, preservatives and
`antioxidants. for example parabens derivatives. for example
`propyl p-hydroxybenzoate. butylated hydroxytoluene
`derivatives. ascorbic acid and sodium metabisulphite; metal
`ion sequestering agents. for example sodium edetate; and
`antifoaming agents. for example a silicone derivative. for
`example dimethicone or simethicooe.
`The:re is a difficulty in the addition of koown preserva(cid:173)
`tives to oil-in-water emulsions such as 'Diprivan'. As stated
`above, 'Diprivan' is an anaesthetic used fe6 induction and
`maintenance of general anaesthesia and for sedation. The
`volumes administered can be considerable. partirularly in
`the case of sedation. Accordingly. significant volumes of
`preservative may be administered to the patient receiving
`treatment. Thus very careful selection of additive must be
`made in order to satisfy drug Regulatory Authorities; par(cid:173)
`ticularly as the use of preservatives in single-dose. termi(cid:173)
`nally sterilised, parenteral injectables is not s uggested and/or
`is the subject of cautionary statements in various Guidelines.
`for example those of the US. UK and European Pbarma(cid:173)
`copcias.
`Furthermore there is a particular p-oblcm in the inclusion
`of additives in an oil-in-water emulsion for parenteral
`administration. It is believed that fer effectiveness. the
`antimicrobial properties of any preSCl'Vative have to be
`exerted in the aqueous phase. Thus, a preservative with
`lipophilic properties incCipCiated at typical usage levels
`would not be effective as, although there would be some
`partitioning between the phases, there would be insufficient
`material in the aqueous phase. Increasing the overall quan(cid:173)
`tity of such preservative would result in unacceptably high
`levels of preservative in the lipid layer leading to toxicity
`problems at least.
`
`lS
`
`10
`
`4
`O n the other hand. addition of a preservative with
`hydrophilic properties, eg an ionic material. also leads to
`problems. The addition of ionic material to an oil-in-water
`emulsion tends to destabilise the emulsion. With a higher
`s ionic load (that is· concentration of ionic material) the
`stabilising electrical charge (Zeta potential) on the oily
`droplets can change. Such electrical charge changes increase
`the probability of droplet collisions and increase the physical
`instability of the emulsion.
`We studied the possibility of adding one of a number of
`antimicrobial agents to the oil-in-water emulsion. Such an
`agent would have to have no significant detrimental effect on
`the physical and chemical stability of the emulsion.
`Furthermore. such an agent would have to provide the
`antimicrobial activity being sought.
`A number of potential agents were found to cause
`instability of the emulsion. Other potential agents failed to
`provide the level of antimicrobial activity being sought. In
`addition. we were seeking an agent that would provide these
`levels of activity at as low a concentration as possible in
`20 order to minimise the potential for physical instability and to
`minimise safety concerns.
`After significant effort including consideration of the
`known preservatives phenylmercuric acetate, phenylmercu(cid:173)
`ric nitrate. benzyl alcohol, chlorobutanol. chlorocresol and
`~ phenol and the study of the known preservatives sodium
`metabisulphite. sodium sulphite. sodium methyl hydroxy(cid:173)
`benzoate and sodium propyl hydroxybenzoate. we were
`unable to find a preservative that met our requirements. We
`then investigated the possible use of other agents which
`30 might have the action th.at we sought. We unexpectedly
`found that edetate. which is not regarded as a broad spec(cid:173)
`trum antimicrobial agent was the only agent that would meet
`our requirements. As referred to above. edetate as the
`sodium salt is mentioned in our UK Patent 1472793 as a
`3S possible metal io n sequestering agent. Sodium edetate is
`included in two of tbe many Cremophor-containing
`examples of that Patenl
`Accordingly the present invention provides a sterile
`pharmaceutical composition for parenteral administration
`40 which comprises an oil-in-water emulsion in which propofol
`dissolved in a water-immiSCible solvent. is emulsified with
`water and stabilised by means of a surfactant. and which
`further comprises an amount of edetate sufficient to prevent
`significant growth of microorganisms for at least 24 hours
`45 (in the event of :adventitious. extrinsic contamination).
`By an oil-in-water emulsion we mean a distinct two(cid:173)
`phase system that is in equilibrium and in effect. as a whole.
`is kinetically stable and thennodynamically unstable. 'This is
`in complete contrast to a micellar formulation, for example
`so with Cremophor EL. which is thttmodynamically stable ..
`By the term .. edet.ate" we mean ethylenediaminetetraace(cid:173)
`tic acid (EDTA) and derivatives thereof, for example the
`disodium derivative is kDown as disodium edetate. In gen(cid:173)
`eral suitable edelates of this invention are those salts having
`ss lower affinity for EDTA than calcium. Particular derivatives
`of use in the present invention include trisodium edetate.
`tetrasodium edet.ate and disodium calcium edet.ate. The
`nature of the edetate is not criticaL provided that it fuUils the
`function of preventing si&nificant growth of microorganisms
`60 for at least 24 hours in the event of adventitious extrinsic
`contamination (e.g. preferably no more than 10-fold increase
`following a low level of extrinsic contaminll.tion. sucb as
`10-103 colony fami.ng units. at temperatures in the range of
`20°-25° C.). As can be seen from the experimental section.
`6S sodium calcium edctate bas some advantages over other
`additives but disodium edetate is exceptional. Accordingly.
`most preferably the edetate is disodium edetate.
`
`Exh. 1014
`
`

`
`5,714,520
`
`5
`Typically the edetate will be present in the compositions
`of the present invention in a molar concentration (with
`respect to the EDTA free acid) in the range 3xlo-s to
`9xl0 ....... Preferably the edetate is present in the range 3xlo-s
`to 7.5xto-<~ for example in the range Sxlo-s to Sxl0--4 and
`more pa:eferably in the range l.Sxl0--4 to 3.0xl0-'~ most
`preferably about l.Sxl0--4.
`A composition of the present invention typically com(cid:173)
`prises from 0.1 to 5%. by weight. of propofol. Preferably the
`composition comprises from 1 to 2% by weight of propofol
`and. in particular. about 1% or about 2%.
`In another aspect of the invention propofol alone is
`emulsified with water by means of a surfactant. It is pre(cid:173)
`ferred that propofol is dissolved in a water-immiscible
`solvent prior to emulsification.
`The water-immiscible solvent is suitably present in an
`amount that is up to 30% by weight of the composition, more
`suitably 5-25%. preferably 10-20% and in particular about
`10%.
`A wiide range of water-immiscible solvents can be used
`in the compositions of the present invention. Typically the
`water-immiscible solvent is a vegetable oil. for example soy
`bean. sa:fflower. cottonseed. corn. sunflower. arachis. castor
`or olive oil. Preferably the vegetable oil is soy bean oil.
`Alternatively. the water-immiscible solvent is an ester of a
`medium or long-chain fatty acid for example a mono-. di-.
`or triglyceride; or is a chemically modified or manufactured
`material such as ethyl oleate. isopropyl myristate. isopropyl
`palmirate. a glycerol ester or polyoxyl hydrogenated castor
`oil. In a further alternative the water-immiscible solvent may
`be a marine oil. for example cod liver or another fish-derived
`oil. Suitable solvents also include fractionated oils for
`example fractionated coconut oil or modified soy bean oil.
`Furthermore. the compositions of the present invention may
`comprise a mixture of two or more of the above water(cid:173)
`immiscible solvents.
`Propofol. either alone or dissolved in a water-immiscible
`solvent. is emulsified by means of a surfactant Suitable
`surfactants include synthetic non-ionic sUtfactants. for
`example ethoxylated ethers and esters and polYP£opylene(cid:173)
`polyethylene block co-polymers. and phosphatides for
`example naturally occuring phosphatides such as egg and
`soya phosphatides and modified or artificially manipulated
`phosphatides (for example prepared by physical fraction(cid:173)
`ation and/or chromatography). or mixtures thereof. Pre(cid:173)
`ferred surfactanis are egg and soya phosphatides.
`The composition of the present invention is suitably
`formulated to be at physiologically neutral pH. typically in
`the range 6.0-8.5. if necessary by means of alkali such as
`sodium hydroxide.
`The composition of the present invention may be made
`isotonic with blood by the incorporation of a suitable
`tonicity modifier for example glycerol.
`The composition of the present inventions are typically
`sterile aqueous formulations and are prepared according to 55
`conventional manufacturing techniques using for example
`aseptic manufacture or terminal sterilisation by autoclaving.
`The comp<>sitions of the present invention are useful as
`anaesthetics which includes sedation and induction and
`maintenance of general anaesthesia. Accordingly in another 60
`aspect the present invention provides a method of producing
`anaesthesia (including sedation and induction and mainte(cid:173)
`nance of general anaesthesia) in a warm-blooded animal,
`including humans. which comprises administering parenter(cid:173)
`ally a sterile aqueous pharmaceutical composition which 65
`comprises an oil-in-water emulsion in which propofol. either
`alone or in a water-immiscible solvent. is emulsified with
`
`6
`water and stabilised by means of a surfactant and which
`further comprises an effective amount of edetate.
`Dosage levels of propofol for producing general
`anaesthesia. both induction (for example about 2.0-2.5
`5 mgfkg for an adult) and maintenance (for example about
`4-12 mglkglhr). and for producing a sedative effect (for
`example 0.3-4.5 mglkglhr). may be derived from the sub(cid:173)
`stantial literature on propofol. Furthermore the anaesthetist
`and/or physician would modify the dose to achieve the
`10 desired effect in any particular patient. in accordance with
`normal skill in the art.
`The advantages referred to above for including edetate in
`propofol compositions apply also to intravenous fat emul-
`15 sions which typically are administe-red. to patients in need
`thereof. over periods of a day or more. Intravenous fat
`emulsions (also known as parenteral nutrition emulsions) are
`administered. usually by infusion. to patients having require(cid:173)
`ments for additional calories and adequate nutrition. by oral
`20 or other means. is not desirable or is not possible. Intrave(cid:173)
`nous fat emulsions typically maintain a positive nitrogen
`balance and provide an a~uate source of energy (e.g. as
`fat). vitamins and trace elements. Such emulsions are used
`typically in intensive care environments but also in other
`25 hospital and domestic settings. Examples of such intrave(cid:173)
`nous fat emulsions include Intralipid (marketed by
`Pharmacia), Upofundin (Braun) and.Travamulsion (Baxter).
`lntralipid. Upofundin and TravamuJ.sion are all trademarks.
`Accordingly .i!n another aspect. the present invention
`30 provides an intravenous fat emulsion which comprises an
`amount of edetate sufficient to prevent significant growth of
`microorganisms for at least 24 hours. In particular the
`present iove!ltion pro-vi<ies a st~i!e, aqueous composition
`35 for parenteral administration which comprises an oil-in(cid:173)
`water emulsion in which a water-immiscible solvent is
`emulsified with water and stabilised by means of a surfactant
`and which further comprises an amount of edetate sufficient
`to prevent significant growth of microorganisms for at least
`40 24 hours.
`Furthermore. it has been proposed that various drugs
`may be administered in oil-in-water emulsions. for example
`see U.S. Pat. No. 4.168308. Accordingly in a further aspect.
`the present invention provides a sterile. aqueous composi-
`45 tion for parenteral administration which comprises an oil(cid:173)
`in-water emulsion containing a therapeutic or pharmaceuti(cid:173)
`cal agent. in which the agent. either alone or dissolved in a
`water-immiscible solvent. is emulsified with water and sta-
`bilised by means of a surfactant and which further comprises
`50 an amount of edetate sufficient to prevent significant growth
`of microorganisms for at least 24 hours.
`Suitable therapeutic or pharmaceutical agents are those
`capable of being administered parenterally in an oil-in-water
`emulsion. Typically such agents are lipophilic compounds
`and may for ex.ample be antifungal agents. anaesthetics.
`antibacterial agents. anti-cancer agents. anti-emetics. agents
`acting on the central nervous system such as diazepam.
`steroids. barbiturates and vitamin preparations. In particular
`the present invention relates to sucb oil-in-water emulsions
`which typically are administered. to patients in need thereof.
`over periods of a day or more.
`Comments herein relating to typical and preferred pro(cid:173)
`pofol compositions of this invention and the preparation
`thereof apply mutatis mutandis to intravenous fat emulsions
`and to oil-in-water emulsions containing a therapeutic or
`pharmaceutical agent
`
`Exh. 1014
`
`

`
`7
`EXPERlMENTAL
`
`5,714,520
`
`8
`
`Quantities:
`
`propoful
`soy bcao oil
`eag pbospbatidc
`glycerol
`disodi.UIII edetlle diby<hle
`(equivalent 10 disodium edotate
`sodium hydroxide
`Water fur Jnjectjoos
`
`1.0
`10.0
`1.2
`2.2S
`0.0055
`0.005)
`q.s.
`10 100
`
`s
`
`10
`
`----------------------------------------- IS
`
`Preparation:
`
`All processing stages are carried out under Nitrogen and
`weights refer to weight in the final volume.
`
`20
`
`A sterile aqueous oil-in-water emulsion for parenteral
`administration is prepared as follows:
`
`2S
`
`An oil-in-water emulsion containing 2% (by weight) of
`propofol may be prepared in a similar manner using the
`following quantities of ingredients:
`Quantities:
`
`1. AD aqueous phase is prepared from glycerol (2.25% by
`weight). disodium edeUte dihydrate (0.0055% by weight).
`sodium hydroxide (typically 60 mgL - I ) and Water for 30
`Injections. This mixture is stirred and taken to a temperature
`of awoximatcly 65° c.
`
`2. The aqueous phase is passed throuab a :filter to remove 35
`particulate matter and transferred to a m.ixiog vessel.
`
`'J> (we-i&ht)
`
`2.0
`popofol
`10.0
`S>Y bean oil
`egg pbolphttide
`1.2
`2.2S
`sJycerol
`o.ooss
`disodium edewe dihychle
`q.s.
`sodium hydroxide
`Water for Injectioos
`10 100
`--------------------------------------
`
`3. In parallel to the above. an oil phase is prepared from
`soy bean oil (10.0% by weight). propofol (1.0% by weight)
`and egg phosphatide (1.2% by weight) iD a vesse

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket