throbber
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS INC.,
`
`Petitioner
`
`V.
`
`WARNER CHILCOTT COMPANY, LLC.,
`
`Patent Owner
`
`Case IPR2015—00682
`
`Patent 7,704,984
`
`PATENT OWNER’S UPDATED EXHIBIT LIST
`
`DC: 580676]-1
`
`

`
`IPR2015—00682
`
`List of Exhibits
`
`2002
`
`2003
`
`2004
`
`2005
`
`
` opinion fromwatnerchizcott C0,, LLC v. L..,..—..Ltd. et at, C
`2001
`Civ. A. Nos. 11-05048, 12-2928 D.N.J. Jan. 17, 2014
`Opinion from Warner Chilcott Co., LLC v. Lupin Ltd., et al,
`Nos. 2014-1267, -1273 Fed. Cir. Oct. 22, 2014
`Excerpts of Trial Transcripts from Warner Chilcott Co., LLC v.
`Lupin Ltd. et al., Civ. A. Nos. 11-05048, 12-2928 (D.N.J. Oct.
`7-17, 2013
`Speroff, L. & P.D. Darney, A Clinical Guide for Contraception
`(4th ed. 2005) (PTX 83 from Warner Chilcott Co., LLC v. Lupin
`Ltd. et al., Civ. A. Nos. 11-05048, 12-2928 D.N.J.
`Speroff, L. & Darney, P.D., A Clinical Guide for Contraception
`(3d ed. 2001) (PTX 82A from Warner Chilcott Co., LLC v.
`Lu in Ltd. et al., Civ. A. Nos. 11-05048, 12-2928 (D.N.J.!)
`Prescribin Information for L0 Loestrin Fe
`van Heusden, A.M., Fauser, B.C.J.M., “Activity of the pituitary-
`ovarian axis in the pill-free interval during use of low-dose
`combined oral contraceptives,” Contraception, 1999; 59:237-
`243. (DTX 507 from Warner Chilcott Co., LLC v. Lupin Ltd. et
`al., Civ. A. Nos. 11-05048, 12-2928
`Teichmann, A.T., et al., “The influence of the dose of ethinyl
`estradiol in oral contraceptives on follicle growth,” Gynecol.
`Endocrinol. 1995; 9:299-305. (DTX 477 Warner Chilcott Co.,
`LLC v. Lupin Ltd. et al., Civ. A. Nos. 11-05048, 12-2928
`D.N.J.
`
`2006
`
`2007
`
`2008
`
`2009
`
`L 2010
`
`U.S. Patent 5,980,940 (JTX 16 from Warner Chilcott Co., LLC
`v. Lupin Ltd. et al., Civ. A. Nos. 11-05048, 12-2928 tD.N.J.))
`Kaunitz, A., Oral Contraceptive Estrogen Dose Considerations,
`58 Contraception 15S (1998) (PTX 48 from Warner Chilcott
`Co., LLC v. Lupin Ltd. et al., Civ. A. Nos. 11-05048, 12-2928
`D.N.J.
`
`2011
`
`2012
`
`Darney, P., OC Practice Guidelines: Minimizing Side Effects,
`42 Int’l J. Fertility & Women’s Med. 158 (Suppl. 1 1997) (PTX
`21 from Warner Chilcott Co., LLC v. Lupin Ltd. et al., Civ. A.
`Nos. 11-05048, 12-2928 D.N.J.
`Thorneycroft, I. & Cariati, S., Ultra-Low-Dose Oral
`Contrace tives: Are The Riht for Your Patient?,
`
`1
`
`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IPR2015—00682
`
`
`
`
`
`2013
`
`
`
`2015
`
`2016
`
`2017
`
`2018
`
`2019
`
`2020
`
`2021
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1y 3, 2001 (PTX 99 from Warner
`wvvw.medscape.com, Ju
`Chilcott Co., LLC v. Lupin Ltd. et al., Civ. A. Nos. 11-05048,
`
`
`12-2928
`.
`.
`.
`Akerlund et al., Comparative Profiles of Reliability, Cycle
`Control and Side Effects of Two Oral Contraceptive
`
`Formulations Containing 150 mcg Desogestrel and Either 30 or
`20 mcg Ethinyl Estradiol, 100 Brit. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 832
`(1993) (PTX 1 from Warner Chilcott Co., LLC v. Lupin Ltd. et
`al., Civ. A. Nos. 11-05048, 12-2928 D.N.J.))
`Marut, E., Oral Contraceptives; Who, Which, When, and Why,
`82 Postraduate Medicine, 1987
`U.S. Patent No. 4,292,315 (PTX 112 Warner Chilcott Co., LLC
`v. Lu in Ltd. et al., Civ. A. Nos. 11-05048, 12-2928 D.N.J.
`Serfaty, D., The 20 Microgram Ethinyl Estradiol Plus 150
`Microgram Desogestrel Pill Multicenter Study on 235 Women
`for 6 Months, 18 Contraception—fertilite sexualite 407 (1990)
`(PTX 78) from Warner Chilcott Co., LLC v. Lupin Ltd. et al.,
`Civ. A. Nos. 11-05048, 12-2928 D.N.J.
`Lammers et al., Double-blind comparative acceptability study
`with two combined oral contraceptives containing 20 ug
`ethinylestradiol plus desogestrel or norethisterone acetate, in
`Optimizing the estrogen dose in oral contraceptives 67-74
`(1992) (PTX 52 from Warner Chilcott Co., LLC v. Lupin Ltd. et
`al., Civ. A. Nos. 11-05048, 12-2928 D.N.J.
`Task Force on Oral Contraceptives, A randomized, double—blind
`study of six combined oral contraceptives, 25 Contraception 231
`(Mar. 1982) (PTX 97 from Warner Chilcott Co., LLC v. Lupin
`Ltd. et al., Civ. A. Nos. 11-05048, 12-2928 D.N.J.
`Bounds, et al., A Randomized Double-Blind Trial of Two Low
`Dose Combined Oral Contraceptives, 86 Brit. J . Obstetrics 325
`(1979) (PTX 10 from Warner Chilcott Co., LLC v. Lupin Ltd. et
`al., Civ. A. Nos. 11-05048, 12-2928 D.N.J.
`Szarewski, A. & Guillebaud, J ., Contraception: A User’s
`Handbook (1998) (PTX 93 from Warner Chilcott Co., LLC v.
`
`Lain Ltd. et al., Civ. A. Nos. 11-05048, 12-2928 D.N.J.
`U.S. Patent 4,921,843 (JTX 15 from Warner Chilcott Co., LLC
`v. Lain Ltd. et al., Civ. A. Nos. 11-05048, 12-2928
`
`
`
`2022
`
`Exce ts from the Deosition Transcri t of Kurt Bamhart, M.D.
`
`2
`
`

`
`IPR2015—00682
`
`Miscellaneous Exhibits introduced at trial by Lupin Ltd. and
`Amneal Pharmaceuticals in Warner Chilcott Co., LLC v. Lupin
`
`Sullivan et al., Effect of 21-day and 24-day oral contraceptive
`regimens containing gestodene (60 lag) and ethinyl estradiol (15
`ug) on ovarian activity, 72 Fertility & Sterility 115 (July 1999)
`(PTX 91 from Warner Chilcott Co., LLC v. Lupin Ltd. et al.,
`
`Gestodene Study Group 324, Cycle control, safety and efficacy
`of a 24-day regimen of gestodene 60 ug/ethinylestradiol 15 ug
`and a 21- day regimen of desogestrel 150 ug/ethinylestradiol 20
`pg, 4 Eur. J. Contraception & Reproductive Health Care 17
`(Suppl. 2 1999) (PTX 37 from Warner Chilcott C0,, LLC v.
`Lain Ltd. et al., Civ. A. Nos. 11-05048, 12-2928 D.N.J.
`Endrikat, J ., et al., “Double-blind, multicenter comparison of
`efficacy, cycle control, and tolerability of a 23-day versus a 21-
`day low-dose oral contraceptive regimen containing 20 mcg
`ethinyl estradiol and 75 meg gestodene,” Contraception, 2001;
`64:99-105. (DTX 520 from Warner Chilcott Co., LLC v. Lupin
`Ltd. et al., Civ. A. Nos. 11-05048, 12-2928 D.N.J.
`Szarewski, A. & Guillebaud, J., Contraception: A User’s Guide
`(3d ed. 2004) (PTX 92 from Warner Chilcott Co., LLC v. Lupin
`Ltd. et al., Civ. A. Nos. 11-05048, 12-2928 D.N.J.
`Complaint of Warner Chilcott Co., LLC. in Warner Chilcott Co.
`LLC v. M lan, Inc. et al., Civ. No. 3:13-06560 D.N.J.
`Answer and Counterclaims of Mylan in Warner Chilcott Co.
`LLC v. M lan, Inc. et al., Civ. No. 3:13-06560 D.N.J.
`Scheduling Order in Warner Chilcott Co. LLC v. Mylan, Inc. et
`al., Civ. No. 3:13-06560 D.N.J.
`Thomas MA. Contraception. Conn’s Current Therapy, pp.
`1123-8, 2001.
`Thomas MA: Fertility Control and Contraception. Gynecology
`& Obstetrics, A Longitudinal Approach. Chapter III:185-207,
`1993.
`
`2031
`
`2032
`
`2033
`
`Settlement Areement Business Confidential Information)
`
`

`
`IPR2015-00682
`
`Date: August 19, 2015
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`ffwmx
`E
`3
`.'
`jg}
`f
`j
`“‘
`By ‘kw,///Z033?,»
`
`Andrea G. Reister, Bag. No. 36,253
`Enrique D. Longton, Reg. No. 47,304
`COVINGTON & BURLING LLP
`
`
`
`
`
`One CityCenter, 850 Tenth Street, NW
`Washington, DC 20001
`(202) 662-6000
`Attorneys for Patent Owner
`
`

`
`IPR2015—00682
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.6, I hereby certify that on this 19th day of August 2015,
`
`the foregoing Patent Owner’s Updated Exhibit List was served Via email by
`
`agreement of the parties on the following counsel of record for petitioner:
`
`Cedric C.Y. Tan (ctan@mcguirewoods.com)
`McGuireWoods LLP
`
`2001 K Street NW, Suite 400
`Washington, DC 20006—1040
`
`Karen L. Carroll (kcarroll@mcguirewoods.com)
`Brie L.B. Buchanan (bbuchanan@mcguirewoods.com)
`McGuireWoods LLP
`
`1230 Peachtree Street, Suite 2100
`
`Atlanta, Georgia 30309
`
`Dated: August 19, 2015
`
`Reg. No. 36,2’ 3

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket