throbber
ERTiLLT .ND SI ERILIT\
`AU
`JOL
`1999
`.JUI
`lsii Amirran
`
`Cupydght
`
`SucStv
`
`fir Ripriductrvi
`
`Methuno
`
`Paintiffs Exhibit
`Pie 11Q4$-JAPTJB
`Ce Ku 1Fac292-JAPTJfl
`PTX 091
`
`iJJJ
`
`Effect of 21day and 24day oral
`contraceptive regimens containing
`gestodene 60
`and ethinyl estradiol
`15
`on ovarian activity
`
`Helen Sullivan MD Hilary Furniss
`Max Eltein MD
`
`ChB Jurgen Spona Ph.D and
`
`University
`
`of Manchester Manchester
`
`United Kingdom
`
`and Ludwig Boltzmann Institute
`
`for Experimental
`
`Endocrinology
`
`University
`
`of Vienna Vienna Austria
`
`Objectie
`low-dose
`
`Desii
`
`To compare mulation inhibition
`oral contraceptive COC containing
`combined
`
`and
`
`osarian
`
`activity with 21-day
`regimens of
`60 jg of gestodenc and 15 rg of ethinyl estradiol
`
`and 24-day
`
`Intcr entional
`
`obsersational
`
`study
`
`Setting Reproductive medicine unit
`
`Patients Fifty-eight
`
`healthy
`
`volunteers
`
`aged
`
`18
`
`35 years
`
`Published
`
`bu
`
`Elsevier
`
`Srtiice
`
`Inc
`
`Printed
`
`in acid-free
`
`paper
`
`in
`
`Received
`
`November
`
`111
`
`1998 revised and
`February 26
`
`accepted
`
`1999
`
`by Wyeth
`Supported
`Paris
`Ayerst Research
`France
`
`Helen
`Reprint
`requests
`Sullivan M.D Department
`of Obstetrics
`Gynaecoiogy
`and Reproducbve
`
`of
`
`Interventions
`
`diameters
`
`of
`
`cycles
`
`was monitored
`and blood
`
`c.xere
`
`Ovarian actisity
`every other
`follicle-lire structures
`serum concentrations
`samples to measure
`and posttreatment
`observed for five cycles pretreatment
`progesterone
`Subjects
`in which the COC was administered
`foi either 21 or 24 days of each cycle
`
`day with the use of ultrasound
`
`to measure
`of 17f3-E2
`and three
`control cycles
`
`the
`
`and
`
`Main Outcome Measures Occurrence
`
`01 os ulation and evidence of ovarian
`
`activity
`
`the 30 subjects who received
`The studs was completed by 27 900
`Results
`24 79o of
`the 28 subjects who received
`the 21-day regimen Osulation was
`24-day group and in 74 of 75 cycles
`in no
`follicles were
`in the 21-day group
`Luteinized
`unruptured
`seen
`cycles with the 24-day regimen and in 8o of75
`cycles with the 21-day regimen Mean oarian follicular
`and serum 17f3-h and
`lower in the 24-day group
`levels were
`
`of
`
`the 24-day regimen and bs
`inhibited
`in the
`
`in all cycles
`
`deselopinent
`
`progesterone
`
`The 24-day regimen is an innosatise
`stiategy for maintaimng
`Conclusions
`l999 115
`20
`at ultra-low doses ot contraceptive
`steroids
`lertil Steril5
`Reproductive Medicine
`Key Words Combined oral contraceptive gestodene
`
`inhibition
`
`ovulation
`
`effectisc mutation inhibition
`
`1999 by American
`
`Society
`
`for
`
`ultrasound
`
`Successis
`
`reductions
`
`and
`
`doses
`
`have
`
`that pill omission might lead
`finding suggests
`to os ulation and
`
`more readily
`
`Healthcare
`
`University
`
`Manchester Manchester
`United Kingdom FAX 44-
`161-276-6134
`
`Department
`of Obstetrics
`logy and
`
`t3ynaeco
`
`Reproductive
`of Manchester
`
`Healthcare
`
`University
`
`of Obstetrics
`
`Department
`and Gynaecology Ludwig
`Boltzmann
`
`Institute
`
`for
`
`be fully explored
`
`Preparations
`
`that contain 20 jzg of ethinyl
`estradiol FE appear
`
`to
`
`suppress
`
`osulation
`
`consistently
`
`in
`
`traditional
`
`Experimental
`
`regimen with
`
`7-day
`
`pill-free
`
`Endocrinology
`
`Division
`
`of
`
`combined with 150
`
`Cellular
`
`University
`
`Endocrinology
`of Vienna
`
`Vienna
`
`Austria
`
`001 5-0282199/$20.OO
`P11 S001 5-02829900205-8
`
`of gestodene
`
`jag of desogestrel or 75 jtg
`However
`des el
`
`follicular
`
`opment
`
`and circulating E2 levels are greater
`
`compared with
`the pill-free
`during
`preparations that contain 30 jag of FE
`
`interval
`
`This
`
`in the estrogen
`impros ed the risk-to-
`progestin
`ratio of combined
`
`oral
`
`contracepirs es
`
`benefit
`
`failure
`
`COCs
`gen dose
`
`Further
`
`reductions
`
`in the estro
`
`in combination
`
`with the lowest effec
`
`din with
`of EE and 75
`
`Reduction
`
`contraceptive
`of the pill-free interval
`preparation that contains 20 p.g
`
`to
`
`jzg of gestodene
`
`is associated
`
`tive
`
`doses of
`
`the newer progestins
`
`ha-se
`
`ci
`
`to
`
`with reduced ovarian activity
`
`compared with
`
`1-day active pill
`when
`
`interval
`
`low-dose
`
`preparations
`
`safety
`
`conventional
`
`reginnen with
`
`interval
`
`duced pill-free
`
`that
`
`7-day pill-five
`re
`This finding suggests
`interval may improve the mar
`with the use of
`gin of contraceptive
`in susceptible women
`
`We examined the effects
`
`of
`
`further reduc
`
`tions
`
`on
`and progestin
`doses
`in the estrogen
`ovarian actis ity using an ultmlow -dose COC
`with 15 pg of EE and
`60 tg of gestodene
`rugimen with
`4day pill-five interval
`
`and
`
`These
`
`115
`
`WC_LP0405702
`
`Mylan v. Warner Chilcott IPR2015-00682
`WC Ex. 2024, Pg. 1
`
`

`
`doses of BE and
`
`gestodene were mvcstigated
`
`ith an extra
`
`days of active
`
`treatment
`
`in each 28-din
`
`because even
`dc
`
`dose
`reduction compared ii ith
`they represented
`preparations that contain 20 jig of EE and 75 jig of gestodene
`
`significant
`
`Grading
`
`scale for ovarian actvty
`
`1ATERIALS AND METHODS
`
`to assess the effects
`
`on
`
`Two open-label studies were conducted
`health women
`arian adu ity of COC regimens of
`in each
`cycle with
`treatment
`28-day
`
`and 24 days
`
`of
`
`21
`
`fonnulations
`BE
`
`that contained
`
`60 jig of gestodene
`randomtied double-blind
`
`and 15 jig of
`
`design was not considered
`
`Grading scale
`
`no activity
`
`potential actl\lty
`
`nonacti
`
`follicle
`
`likc structure
`
`active
`
`follide-liku
`
`siructur
`
`feasible
`
`There would have
`
`been logistical
`
`problems in in
`
`lutemized
`
`unruptured
`
`follicle
`
`Diameur ot
`
`follicle
`
`liki
`
`Leel of
`
`struure
`
`mm
`
`Le\
`ci of
`pg mL
`
`pro5tcrone
`ng rnL
`
`10
`
`10 11
`
`13
`13
`
`13
`
`1.6
`
`.6
`
`vestigating
`
`this number of volunteers
`
`relatively
`
`small
`
`reproducti
`
`medicine
`
`in
`
`in one
`study
`unit We also be
`ould be
`
`that
`
`it
`
`lieved
`
`70 in months
`
`proach would enhance
`
`on the basis of our experience
`wInch regimen each
`to the tin estigators
`apparent
`mm as taking Because of the intensity
`of the schedule
`ire believed that an open candid ap
`relationship with the volunteers
`our
`
`oman
`
`of
`
`isits
`
`needed
`
`to perform such
`
`studs
`
`The studies mm crc conducted
`
`according
`
`to the Declaration
`
`of Helsinki
`
`guidelines
`
`and with the approval
`
`of our institu
`
`tional
`
`review board Written informed consent was obtained
`
`from all participants
`
`Study Subjects
`mm omen mm ho were 1835 rears old were within
`Healthr
`limit of normal weight and smoked 10
`20% of the upper
`per day were eligible to participate
`in the study
`All subjects had three regular 25- to
`1-day menstrual
`
`cigarettes
`
`osulation
`
`13
`
`\ore
`
`Table
`
`adapted
`
`1mm Fitzgeiald em al
`
`30
`30
`30
`30
`
`either
`
`for 21 days with
`
`7-day pill-free inters al or for
`
`days of placebo
`
`tablets in each
`
`28-day
`
`cycle
`
`started
`
`first
`
`given
`24 days with
`Treatment
`day of menstruation
`was
`on file
`Compliance was assessed from the diaiy cards
`kept by the
`subjects No woman omitted
`than 24 hours
`pill for
`longer
`in either study At the start of each cycle the weight
`blood pressure of each subject was checked
`
`and
`
`Ovarian Activity
`The
`outcome measure was
`
`ovarian activity
`
`activity
`
`cycles before the start of the pretreatment
`were required to use
`
`medicalls
`
`acceptable
`
`cs cle All subjects
`
`nonhormonal
`
`form of contraception
`
`during the study
`
`Subjects were excluded
`
`from
`
`the study if they had
`
`histomy
`
`of or the presence of anm medical
`
`condition know ml to
`
`be
`risk factor
`Women mu ho had
`
`ruth COCs
`for adverse
`ements associated
`historu of previous failure of an OC
`with previous OC use or undi
`months also
`
`experience
`
`bleeding witlun the previous
`No
`
`mu as allowed
`
`to use any other
`
`serious adverse
`
`agnosed genital
`
`were excluded
`
`interfere
`
`mu
`
`subject
`hormone or any other concomitant
`ith study assessments
`
`medication
`
`that
`
`could
`
`All women
`
`had normal
`
`tests and cervical smear test
`routine blood
`at the start
`of the study Only mu omen who or ulated in the pretreatment
`control cycle were eligible to start treatment
`
`Three
`
`subjects
`
`results
`
`primary
`which was determined
`by ultrasound obserm ation of follicle-
`and by honnone
`assays of serum B2 proges
`like structures
`terone FSH and LH Ultrasound
`and hormone assessments
`were made em cry
`cycles Ovarian
`days during the five
`to the scale Table
`was graded
`
`according
`
`reported
`
`by Fitzgerald et al
`
`Ovulation
`
`structure
`
`mm as defined as the presence of
`that was 13 mm in diameter and ruptured within
`48 hours
`combined with
`serum l7p-E2 and progesterone
`concentrations of 30 pg/niL
`and 1.6 ng/mL respectim ely
`The definition of
`in the same cycle
`luteinized unruptumud
`
`follicle-like
`
`follicle was the same
`there mm as no evidence
`except
`rupture on ultrasound examination
`
`follicle
`
`that
`
`of
`
`Ultrasound
`
`Examination
`
`struc
`
`or
`
`trans
`
`Plus
`
`Laboratories
`
`in did
`
`I-day group and one
`
`in the 24-day
`
`group
`
`failed
`
`to
`
`fulfill entmy
`
`requirements
`
`Study Design
`Each
`subject was
`
`cycles
`
`treatment cycles
`
`return of ovulation
`COC that
`
`contained
`
`pretreatment
`and
`
`scheduled
`
`to be monitored
`
`over
`
`five
`
`cycle to establish ovulation
`
`three
`
`posttreatment
`The
`
`treatment
`
`cycle to docmnent
`
`the
`
`for each
`
`subject was
`and 15 jig
`of EE
`
`60 jig
`
`of gestodene
`
`116
`
`Sullim an et al
`
`21-day versus
`
`24-day COC regiment
`
`The diameters of right and left ovarian follicle-like
`tures were measured by 5-MHz transabdorninal
`and an Ultramark
`ultrasound
`transducers
`vaginal
`ultrasound machine Advanced Technology
`Bothwell WA For each subject
`the same met hod of ultra
`the study The di
`as the
`structures were calculated
`
`sound examination
`
`was used
`
`throughout
`
`amneters of
`
`follicle-like
`
`mean of
`
`ent planes
`
`three ultrasound measurements
`
`taken in two differ
`
`Hormone Assays
`The blood collected for measurement of hormone con
`and the serum frozen
`
`centrations was centrifuged
`
`Anals sis
`
`was perfonned in batches
`
`one cycle at
`
`time under
`
`the
`
`Vol 72 No
`
`July 1999
`
`WC_LP0405703
`
`Mylan v. Warner Chilcott IPR2015-00682
`WC Ex. 2024, Pg. 2
`
`

`
`Details
`
`of the radloimmunoassays
`sensitivities
`
`used and their
`
`Baseline demographic
`volunteers
`
`characteristics
`
`of 58 healthy
`
`hormone
`measud
`
`F2
`
`Progesterone
`
`FSH
`
`iH
`
`Manufacturer
`
`Sensitis
`
`it
`
`SludI
`
`group
`
`83 pg mL
`
`Characteristic
`
`21-day
`
`regimen
`
`24-dat
`
`regimen
`
`is
`
`28
`
`is
`
`30
`
`Products Corporation
`Diagnostic
`4ngeles GA
`
`Los
`
`Products Corporation
`Diaostic
`thgeles CA
`
`Los
`
`4.84
`
`0.02
`
`0.01 ng mL
`
`Behnng
`
`institute
`
`Marhurg Germany
`
`Sorin Saluggia
`
`Italy
`
`184
`
`009 IL
`
`38
`
`54 IC
`
`Mean 81 age
`
`in
`
`years range
`
`Mean SD weight
`
`in
`
`kilograms
`
`range
`
`No
`
`of patients
`
`with
`
`indicated
`
`parity
`
`36
`
`29.6
`230
`
`285
`
`3.7
`
`220
`
`35.0
`
`63.4
`
`9.4
`
`63.0
`
`7.3
`
`48
`
`87
`
`48.0 85.0
`
`725
`725
`1450
`00
`00
`
`1240
`1033
`723
`00
`
`Sensitivitl
`
`is defined
`
`the -on-entration at 95c of the bindmg at
`
`as
`
`the
`
`minimum
`
`delectable
`
`dose bmding at z.ro concentration
`
`direction of one of the in estigators TS at
`in Vienna Austria Samples were sent to the labora
`tow to be assayed
`time Table
`one ccle at
`in batehes
`the RIAs used Intra-assay and interassa
`were 5%9%
`of vanation
`
`ratoiy
`
`shows
`
`details
`
`of
`
`coefficients
`
`central
`
`labo
`
`Cervical Mucus
`Cerical mucus hostility was assessed
`
`when the ultra
`
`changes
`
`from baseline blood pressure weight or laboratoiy
`values were reported
`
`sound examination
`
`suggested
`
`ovarian
`
`activity
`mechamsins are most
`
`This was
`
`ovulation
`
`is great
`
`Effects on Ovulation and Cervical Mucus
`Assessment
`
`total of 84 cycles were completed in the 24-day
`
`group
`was inhibited in all
`
`and 75 in the 21-day
`
`group Ovulation
`group and in 74 of 75 cycles in the
`cycles in the 24-day
`21-day group The one ovulation
`that occurred
`was atypical
`primarily on the basis
`but fulfilled the grading classification
`of ultrasound findings How ever
`the maximum progesterone
`ng/mL which was not sustained
`let el was
`
`Luteimzed unruptured
`
`follicles were seen
`
`in no cycles
`
`with the 24-day
`
`regimen and in six cycles with the 21-day
`
`and
`
`cycles
`in two cy
`in
`
`follicles
`
`level
`
`them occurred
`in treatment
`regimen all of
`One woman had luteinized unruptured
`des The mean maximum progesterone
`observed
`cycles was 6.4 ngmL
`these
`luteinized unruptured
`424 2.32 ng/mL The mean maximum diameter of
`measured was 29 mm but
`the follicle-like
`there
`
`done because
`adjuvant
`contracepth
`important when the risk of breakthrough
`est Mucus was not collected
`in the presence
`
`of
`
`aginal
`
`bleeding
`
`Cycle Control Assessments
`and intensity
`noted
`the timing
`Subjects
`
`bleeding in
`
`diary
`
`cycle was classified
`
`of all aginal
`as nonual if the
`
`onset of
`
`the withdrawal
`
`bleed did not extend
`
`beyond
`
`days
`
`after
`
`ingestion of
`
`the last active pill and
`
`there was
`
`no
`
`breakthrough
`
`bleeding
`
`or spotting
`
`during the rest of
`
`the
`
`cycle Bleeding
`
`intensity
`
`was rated using the following
`
`scale
`
`none
`
`spotting very slight breakthrough
`
`bleeding
`
`that did not
`
`require sanitars
`
`protection
`
`light
`
`moderate
`
`and
`
`heavy
`
`RESULTS
`
`The baseline demographic
`the women
`who started each study are show
`The study was
`completed by 24 79% of 28 subjects in the 21-day
`group
`and by 27 90 of 30 subjects in the 24-day
`group Four
`in the 24-day
`
`women
`
`in the 21-day
`
`group and
`
`group
`
`characteristics
`
`of
`
`in Table
`
`discontinued
`
`not
`
`related
`
`their participation after
`treatment
`the COC Only
`to use of
`reasons
`cycles are included in the anah sis
`
`starting
`
`for
`
`completed
`
`There were no serious
`reported minor side effects were headache
`pain and breast pain No
`
`adverse
`
`events
`
`and
`
`the most
`ab
`
`clinically
`
`significant
`
`commonly
`
`donminal
`
`range
`
`structures
`
`follicle
`
`was no evidence
`
`of follicular
`
`rupture
`
`SD maximum cervical
`The mean
`cycles for the women who took
`the 21-day
`
`score in the control
`
`preparation was
`
`10.9
`
`68
`
`ds des studied it was reduced
`1.8 in the treatment
`For the women who took the 24-day preparation
`SD maximum cervical
`score was 106
`the mean
`1.9 in
`the control cycles and 4.1
`1.1 in the treatment cycles
`
`to
`
`In the posttrealment
`
`cycle ovulation was obsers ed in all
`regimen and in 18 of 24 subjects
`subjects with the 24-day
`women all had lutein
`with the 21-day
`regimen The other
`ized unruptured
`
`follicle cycles
`
`FERTILITY
`
`STERILITY5
`
`117
`
`WC_LP0405704
`
`Mylan v. Warner Chilcott IPR2015-00682
`WC Ex. 2024, Pg. 3
`
`

`
`Mean diameter of largest
`--0-- 24-day
`
`interval
`
`follicle-like
`
`structure with 21- and 24-day regimens
`
`7-day
`
`pill-free interval
`
`4-day placebo-pill
`
`21-day
`
`17
`
`27
`
`Effects on Ovarian Activity Diameters
`and Levels of
`of Follicle4ike Structures
`
`with the 21-day
`
`regimen However
`
`there was marked variation
`
`between individuals
`
`especially
`
`during the pill-free intervals
`
`bleeding that was more substantial
`in 16 21% of 75 treatment cycles in
`than spotting occurred
`and 35 42% of 84 treatment cycles in the
`the 21-day
`group
`dc breakthrough
`bleed
`24-thy group By the third treatment
`ing occurred in 25% of 24 subjects
`in the 21-day gmup and
`12 42% of 28 subjects
`in the 24-day group Three women in
`woman in the 24-day
`and
`the 21-day
`
`ingestion of the last acti\
`
`group failed
`pill The
`
`to
`
`Cycle Control
`Overall
`
`breakthrough
`
`group
`in the
`
`bleed
`
`days after
`
`Ovarian Steroids
`
`like structure
`
`follicle-like
`
`structures
`
`follicle-
`
`The mean diameters of the largest
`of each subject at each assessment
`for the two regimens are
`The mean diameter of the largest
`shown in Figure
`regimen remained at 10 turn
`for the 24-day
`the three treatment cycles With the 21-day
`throughout
`reg
`imen the mean diameter of
`the largest
`rose to 13 mm in treatment
`
`follicle-like
`
`stmcture
`
`es des
`
`and
`
`The mean semm l7-E concentrutions
`In both groups
`reduction in mean levels occurred
`The 17 level
`remained at
`during the treatment cycles
`50 pg/mL during treatment with the 24-day
`to 100 pg/mL
`during treatment
`cycles
`regimen Serum B2 concentrations
`rose with
`with the 21-day
`during the pill-free interval Mean progester
`both regimens
`regimens How
`remained at
`for both
`ng/rnL
`rise in mean pmgesterone le els was seen in the
`ho took
`the 21 -day preparation in treatment es des
`
`Figure
`
`increased
`
`one levels
`
`ever
`
`slight
`
`women
`
`are shown
`
`in
`
`regimen but
`and
`
`and
`
`because
`
`of
`
`the luteiniied
`
`unmptured
`
`follicles
`
`observed
`
`Levels
`
`onli
`
`little
`
`with
`
`of LH were suppressed
`during treatment
`rise seen during the pill-free intervals The mean
`small
`le els during treatment were all 10 mlLT/mL
`There was
`regimens Con
`difference between the 21- and 24-day
`centrations of FSH were suppressed with active treatment
`However during each pill-free interval with both regimens
`FSH rose to levels similar to those seen in the control cycles
`There was better
`
`suppression
`
`with the 24-day
`
`regimen than
`
`mean duration
`
`bleeding was
`in the
`of withdrawal
`days
`in the 24-day groups The median
`group
`of bleeding was light
`in both groups
`
`and
`
`days
`
`21-day
`
`intensity
`
`DISCUSSION
`
`It
`
`the doses of estrogen
`is desirable to mnnunuze
`progestins in COCs to reduce the incidence
`and side effects
`has been concern that
`There
`
`of adverse
`
`reducing
`
`and
`
`events
`
`ste
`
`roid doses might reduce the margin of contraceptive efficacy
`iduals and lead to poorer cycle control
`in susceptible mndi\
`that contain 20 rg of EE
`Combined oral contraceptives
`are known to inhibit
`rg of gestodene
`75
`ovulation
`and to decrease
`
`and
`
`effectively
`
`24-day
`
`regimen
`
`of geslodene
`
`represents
`
`en with
`EE and 60
`total BE dose
`
`contain 20
`
`dene dose
`
`cervical mucus
`scores
`COC that contains
`15 j.tg of
`14% reduction in the
`regimnens of OCs that
`per cycle over 21-day
`9% reduction in the total gesto
`of BE and
`over OCs that contain 75 Hg of gestodene
`
`118
`
`Sullivan et aL
`
`21-day ersus 24-day COC regimens
`
`Vnl 72 No
`
`July
`
`lQQ
`
`WC_LP0405705
`
`Mylan v. Warner Chilcott IPR2015-00682
`WC Ex. 2024, Pg. 4
`
`

`
`Mean serum 17-p-E2
`concentration with 21- and 24-day regimens
`--0-- 24-day i-- 21-day
`
`7-day pUt-free
`
`interval
`
`4-day
`
`placebo-pifi
`
`interval
`
`Before
`
`trea4mvnt
`
`200
`
`treatment cycles
`
`Met
`
`treatment
`
`13
`
`19
`
`25
`
`31
`
`Il
`
`17
`
`23
`
`13
`
`19
`
`25
`
`15
`
`21
`
`27
`
`11
`
`17
`
`23
`
`29
`
`Day of cycle
`
`from days
`20 jg of
`to be associated
`
`to
`
`days
`
`75
`
`of stemid thempy With the
`profoundly by the commencement
`and 24 da of active
`risk of breakthrough
`
`shorter 4-clar pill-free interval
`
`per cycle there was
`
`reduced
`
`treainieni
`
`ovulation
`
`Reduction
`of the pill-free
`COC thai
`
`with
`
`contains
`
`interval
`
`gestodene
`
`has been shown
`
`follicular
`
`thai
`
`and
`
`tg of
`is ith better ovar
`
`follicular
`
`develop
`
`Extension
`
`After
`
`treatment with the 24-day
`
`regimen there
`
`was
`
`ariation
`
`in the interval
`
`greater
`treatment and us ulation Because of this variation the mean
`
`between cessation of actii
`
`E2 level
`
`each day was low er This could
`
`represent
`
`the rela
`
`tis
`
`of individuals
`
`ovulation
`
`ian suppression
`as evidenced
`by reduced
`ment and lower serum 17J3-E2 concentrations
`inten al has been shown
`of the pill-free
`to allow increased
`development 10 The results of this study suggest
`COC that contains
`15 rg of EE
`regimen of
`24-day
`and 60 tg of gestodene
`ovulation
`They
`and may
`individuals
`
`also
`
`suggest
`
`that
`
`21-day
`
`regimen is less effectis
`
`effectively
`
`inhibits
`
`ovulation
`
`in susceptible
`
`the adjunctive
`
`contraceptive mechanism
`
`of cervi
`
`cal mucus
`
`hostility
`
`is maintained
`
`allow breakthrough
`However
`
`cacy
`
`of this ultra--low
`
`thousand
`
`the effi
`
`at
`
`interval
`
`Phase 111 studies were peifonned to ins esligate
`-dose COC with
`regimen in
`24-day
`twenty women who fol
`Two
`larger population
`lowed the regimen for 21 521 cycles showed
`Pearl
`Index of
`024 11 This is comparable to that
`seen with COCs that
`contain 30 j.tg of Eli and gestodene 12
`It has been established that maximmn ovarian activity
`is
`with COCs thai
`the end of
`the pill-free
`seen
`In our study of COC that contains
`contain 20 mg of EE
`and 15 j.rg of EE with
`60 mg of geslodene
`21-day
`active
`7-day pill-free mterval al
`treatment
`regimen the standard
`lowed more time for follicles
`so the obsen ed
`
`follicle diameters were larger and the 17 concentrations
`
`to develop
`
`were higher
`
`In addition
`
`the longer pill-free
`
`interval
`
`to allow recruitment
`
`peared
`of development
`
`that
`
`of
`
`follicle
`
`to
`
`ap
`size and stage
`and less
`as suppressed more slow
`
`FERTILITY
`
`STER1LITY
`
`A.know1edgmenr
`
`The authors
`
`thank
`
`the
`
`olunteer
`
`ss ithout
`
`sahorn the
`
`vc ork would not has
`
`been possible
`
`They also
`
`are grateful
`
`to the staff ot
`
`the
`
`119
`
`WC_LP0405706
`
`susceptibility
`
`to breakthrough
`
`This possibility
`
`currently is being explored
`COC with an ultra-low dose of estrogen 15 p.g would
`somew hat more unscheduled
`be expected
`to cause
`aginal
`COC with
`of estrogen Our
`dose
`bleeding than
`higher
`data are consistent with this expectation However other
`studies is ith similar higher-dose preparations 13 14 has
`bleeding The numbers
`reported incidences
`of breakthrough
`of subjects in these studies are too small
`to assess cycle
`is available from larger
`
`control
`
`information
`
`and more useful
`studies 11
`and
`The 60-g dose of gestodene
`5-pg dose of EE in the
`COC used
`in this study are low er than those of am marketed
`The 24-day
`regimen is an innos alive strategs
`is bile maintaining effec
`total contraceptis
`inhibition and tolerability
`
`clinical
`
`formulation
`
`lower
`
`the
`
`tive ovulation
`
`dose
`
`to
`
`Mylan v. Warner Chilcott IPR2015-00682
`WC Ex. 2024, Pg. 5
`
`

`
`Reproductive
`
`EKdicine Unit University
`
`hospital of South Manchester for
`
`their assistance
`
`and
`
`cardiosascular
`
`disease
`
`Is
`
`Lngl
`
`Vcssec
`
`Is coutraccptn
`infarction Report
`1991.98
`1245
`53
`
`use still
`
`contra
`
`egetti
`
`Parazzini
`
`Ovarian
`
`actic
`
`lB
`
`of
`
`ceptives
`
`Ciocignani
`
`Westergaard
`
`Akerlund
`
`Rode
`ity cycle control and
`150
`rg detogestrel
`ontnining
`oestradiol Br Obstet GInsecol
`Lahtcenmaki
`Moorrecs
`
`side effects
`
`of
`
`either
`
`of reliabil
`
`ethinll
`
`Comparative
`profiles
`formulations
`two oral contraceptic
`30 zg or 20 jag
`and
`1993100.832
`Dc Prcst
`
`three da
`
`in oral
`
`contraceptic
`
`users
`
`Extension
`
`of
`
`the pill
`Eds Contracept
`
`free
`1995
`
`period
`1137
`10 Ksllick SR Bancroft
`duration
`the pill
`inters al during
`Edv Contraccpt
`19906 33
`ii Belaiseb
`
`Oelbauni
`
`Morris
`
`Elstein
`
`Extending
`
`the
`
`ot
`
`free
`
`combined
`
`oral
`
`cnntrcception
`
`40
`
`regimen of gcstodene
`ness paradigm
`
`fur
`
`loss
`
`60 jag ethmyi
`dose
`
`oral
`
`cstradiol
`
`contraception
`
`Clinical
`
`efficacy
`
`of
`
`24 day
`
`cy1e control and tolerability
`15 jag Svnsposiurn
`report
`Fifth Corigresc of
`
`References
`Stadel BV Oral
`contraceptises
`Med l98U305.6l2
`Mann
`Thorogood
`Murpls
`associated cc
`ith an increased risk of fatal mvocardial
`case control study Br Obstet Gbnaecol
`\\ Spona
`Elstein
`Ludiclce
`Muller
`Fitzgerald
`Feichtinger
`of two monophasic low dose
`et al coniparison of the effects
`on the inhibition
`PG lesta
`during regular oral
`contraceptic
`
`of ovufttion Mv Contracept 994 18
`use Contraception 996
`
`MaliJIacleli
`
`Clinical
`
`with Mercilon
`
`expeneoce
`reference to ovarian function
`
`Geburtsh
`
`and Marvelon with
`1991
`
`Frauenheilk
`
`15
`June
`Soiiety of Conti aception
`European
`12 Wide MI Balfour
`JA Gestodene.Areciecc
`in combined
`and
`
`contraceptic
`
`efficacy
`tolerability
`199550.364 95
`
`1998
`
`of
`
`its
`
`Prague
`pharmacology
`
`preparations
`
`Drugs
`
`particular
`5134
`
`follicular
`
`lacIer
`
`ccis
`
`.J Elsicin
`
`free
`
`\l Sullivan
`Feiehtsngei
`in combined
`
`intcrcal
`
`Spona
`al Shorter pill
`dec elopment Contraception
`Melmed
`Fichenhrenncr
`
`ical score
`simple
`cc dc Int
`
`menstrual
`
`Gsnaecol
`
`semiquantitatis
`
`for monitoring
`
`Judicke
`
`Muller
`
`ci
`
`13
`
`Saleh
`
`Vs
`
`Burkinan
`
`cc
`
`decreases
`
`RT Zacur HA
`of bleeding
`contracepta Cs comparison
`In Obstet Gynecol
`lcls
`and
`sternal
`MI Waugh MS higgins
`and other
`on sporting
`90
`
`The
`
`the
`
`14 Rosenbeig
`
`gestodene
`19965385
`
`factors
`
`randomized
`
`trial of three oral
`
`patterns by contraccptic
`1740
`1993168
`JE The effect
`and bleeding
`
`of decogesael
`
`Contraception
`
`types
`
`oral
`contraecptis
`19965471
`Sen DM unenfeld
`method
`Obstet 1972
`
`120
`
`Sdllhan et al
`
`21das sctsus
`
`24da5 COC regimdns
`
`Vol 72No
`
`July 1099
`
`WC_LP0405707
`
`Mylan v. Warner Chilcott IPR2015-00682
`WC Ex. 2024, Pg. 6

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket