throbber
The 20 Microgram Ethinyt Estradiol plus 150 Microgram
`Desogestrel Pill
`Multicenter Study on 235 Women for Months
`
`CONTRACEPTION
`
`Artide reahed publisher
`
`on March 21 1990 acccpted
`
`May 22 1900
`
`Merckrd Or
`
`ion Company
`
`Sei1atv
`
`estradiol
`
`The efficacy
`
`new oral contraceptive Mercilun 2O mcg ethinyl
`tolerance of
`and clinical
`150 meg desogestrel were studied in 23i women tar
`105 cycles This was
`an open non Comparative multicenter study lasting
`cycles earned out by 37 French
`
`physicians
`No pregnancies
`Cycie control was satisfactory
`
`were observed
`
`only 55% of the women in the study discontinued
`bleeding
`to irregular
`
`Is hi east
`
`tcridet ness which is
`
`low dose
`
`oral
`
`this contraceptive due
`The incidence
`of subjective side effects paruculai
`known
`was very low
`to be esimpen-dependent
`The Mereilon total continuation rate at months was high fat
`86%
`
`contraceptiVe
`
`Because
`
`of the clinical characteristics
`
`and eycellent metaboln
`
`tolerance already
`
`shown this 20 ct FE pill
`
`can
`
`he prescribed as the
`
`no contraindications
`
`Iirst-line choice to all women
`ore
`
`for combination
`
`seen
`
`for contraception and having
`
`contraceptives
`
`Key words pill 20 meg ethinyl estradiol desogestrel
`235 woirien efficacy
`arid continuation rate are good
`cycle control
`
`French rnultieenter
`
`clinical
`
`stLidy
`
`INTRODUCTION
`
`The cotnpositiun at oral contraceptives OCs
`has evolved
`since the 1960s
`considerably
`when the coritiaceptive
`
`pill
`
`decreasing
`
`acceptability
`
`the side effects
`
`first appeared by
`and increasing the
`of this contraceptive method
`
`the frequency
`
`complications
`
`of thromboembolic
`of OCs is estrogen
`
`dose-
`
`dependent
`
`associated with
`
`in hemostasis
`the changes
`COCs are esirogen-dependent
`sometimes reported
`many of
`by pill users
`
`the side effects
`
`such
`
`as breast
`
`tenderness
`
`and
`
`should
`
`be ioted
`
`compouncli
`
`nausea
`
`are attn hutable to the estrogen
`
`Three main changes
`Reduction
`
`from ISO meg
`in estrogen
`to 40 or 30
`fEE per pill
`ethinyl estradiol
`meg the latter are known
`combined oral contraceptives COCs
`
`dose
`
`as
`
`low-dose
`
`doses from 100
`Since this reduction in estrogen
`to 30 meg EE the fiequency
`of venous
`thrombuembolic incidents
`
`has decreased
`
`There are several
`
`reasons for this reduction
`
`Reduction
`
`in estrogen
`
`frequency
`
`in ptogestin dose because
`of eardtos ascular and ccrebrovascu
`
`the
`
`ar
`
`Contraception-fertilitØ-sexualitØ 1990 Vol 18 No
`
`pp 407-412
`
`PaInflffs ExhibIt
`Cae No 1tO4LJAPTJ
`2O292LJAP-TJ
`
`Nca
`
`PTX 078
`
`WCLP0405495
`
`Mylan v. Warner Chilcott IPR2015-00682
`WC Ex. 2016, Pg. 1
`
`

`
`episodes
`
`from OCs depends
`on the progestin
`dose and the metabolic changes particularly
`observed
`lipid changes sometimes
`in pill
`the progestin dose This
`
`users
`
`also depend oil
`
`reduction in progestin dose
`
`is illustrated in the
`
`three-phase pills
`
`Development of
`
`new generation of
`
`progestins with powerful progestin properties
`low androgenic
`
`activity
`
`that are
`
`and
`
`inetaholical
`
`ly very well
`
`tolerated Three
`
`progestins Lised in oral contraception appear
`among these new progestins desogestrel
`DSG gestodene
`and norgestimate
`It was logical
`
`to try to reduce the estrogen
`
`dose still
`
`further
`
`to the low-
`
`by comparison
`and
`dose combined pills already in existence
`for example to use pills with 20 meg of EE in
`the hope of further
`increasing the
`of oral contraceptives
`
`acceptability
`
`and
`
`furiher
`
`reducing
`
`the vascular risk of this
`
`contraception
`
`This was first
`
`generation progestin
`
`first-
`
`This study showed excellent contraceptive
`and
`efficacy
`cycle control
`
`satisfactory
`
`minimal
`
`incidence
`
`of side effects
`
`goal
`
`the results of
`
`is 10 rcpor
`multicenter study of this Liltra-low
`pill already on the market
`
`in six countries
`
`French
`dosed 7CC
`
`MATERIALS AINI METHODS
`
`The goal of this study was to confirtn
`of Mcrcilon
`efficacy and acceptability
`single-
`combined oral contraceptive
`containing 20 meg ethinyl
`150 meg
`estradiol
`and
`It was an open-label con-
`
`phase
`
`low-dose
`
`desogestrel
`
`the
`
`comparative multicenter study in which
`
`37
`
`French physicians collaborated
`
`Audberi
`
`Bouschhachr
`
`run
`
`3iirsieaux
`Hscissc Moritpeilieri
`Mctz
`Breries Breat
`Iran ohm Paris
`Romaria
`hi
`Pe.sic
`Coste Lunoges
`Rouen
`hi Couture
`Dat
`loulouse
`Dciienharh Schiiiighewt
`0ohrncl Groin
`tOny Marsciiie
`Faveaa Sua.cbourg
`Giltet Nice
`Grail
`Paris
`i.sy-FrØhaul Lounges
`Lops
`FlousOnu Cagnes-sur-Meri
`tNice
`4ahtiisn(cid:244)vici
`NØny Tours
`Toulouse
`Nsrites
`
`.ilfc
`
`Katin-Nailiaii
`
`1i1ris
`nrsrdeauxi
`Nari
`
`Lerrier
`
`Foniotittier
`
`meg
`1972 Bounds
`
`tried by combining
`norethisterone EE 20
`mg Preston
`norethisterone acetate
`et al 1979 then with
`fG
`NG 300 meg or EE 15 meg -F
`EE 20 meg
`NG 400 meg or EE 20 meg
`NG 500 meg
`l.C et al 1977
`Arnt
`
`second-generation
`
`progestin norgestrel
`
`However
`
`the first
`
`15 meg EE pills
`20 meg or
`due to inadequate
`rapidly abandoned
`
`were
`
`contraceptive efficacy
`
`andlor poor cycle
`
`control
`
`resulting
`
`above
`
`all
`
`in unacceptably
`
`irregular
`
`bleeding
`
`The appearance
`of the third-generation
`progestins 1982 dcsogcstrel
`lcd to the
`COC
`possibility of once more developing
`pills containing less than 30 meg EE
`
`contraceptive preparation containing 150
`
`20 meg ethinyl
`meg desogestrel and
`Mercilon was the subject
`of
`
`estradiol
`
`European
`1684 women and
`
`multicenter study involving
`
`25970
`
`cycles
`
`Paris
`Qaecies Roubx
`de Rcilitac
`Ropert Monticrrneii
`Miirsriiie
`Ii RosstnotMdot
`ii Rormnhautu Paris
`Sailly
`Lute
`Scrfary Paris
`
`Sas.ary
`
`Lon
`
`Rossni-Arnar
`Naiicy
`fOurcoittg
`Thoulon
`
`The study lasted
`
`months i.e
`
`Meicilon
`
`cycles
`
`after
`
`visit
`
`cycles
`
`The patients
`were
`seen at the screening
`Mereilon cycles and after
`filled out
`
`During
`
`the cycles the patients
`
`bleeding diary indicating
`the withdrawal bleeding days and
`pill was taken
`
`the days on which
`
`the
`
`any irregular
`
`bleeding
`
`At each
`
`office
`
`visit
`
`the investigator
`
`reported in
`
`the case
`
`report
`
`form
`
`data using the diary that the
`cycle control
`patient was to hring back
`at each visit
`
`weight
`blood
`
`pressure
`
`Contraception-fertilitØ-sexrialite
`
`1990 Vol 18 No
`
`pp 407-412
`
`WC_LP0405496
`
`Mylan v. Warner Chilcott IPR2015-00682
`WC Ex. 2016, Pg. 2
`
`

`
`any side
`
`effects
`
`reported by the patient
`months and
`
`occurring in the first
`effects
`in months
`
`to
`
`reasons
`
`for dropout
`
`if any
`
`Patients
`
`to be fet-tile
`
`but
`
`to have
`
`supposed
`
`aged over 30
`
`eligible for the study were
`in good health and
`17 women under
`the age of 30 were
`included in this study They were
`nonetheless
`none of the classical COC
`of significant
`
`contraindications
`
`no history
`
`cycle disturbances on oral contraceptives
`
`not
`
`have
`
`progestogen
`
`used contraception by injected
`within the past six months or oral
`or macrodosed
`
`progestogens micropill
`
`progestogens
`
`for the last
`
`three months due to
`
`possible atrophic
`
`effect
`
`on the
`
`endometriurn nor have
`
`given birth or had
`
`termination within the
`months prior to
`entering the study Also women who smoked
`day were excluded
`more than 10 cigarettes
`
`estradiol
`
`was taken
`
`but bleeding starting
`
`on or after
`
`the
`
`-a
`
`Ion and continuing for
`18th day of taking Merci
`was counted
`
`as withdrawal
`
`the drug-free interval
`the women themselves
`
`bleeding as
`
`considered
`
`this type of bleeding as
`
`their normal periods
`
`In the case of bleeding beginning
`day and continuing during the rest days the
`
`before the
`
`18th
`
`bleeding days were
`until day 21 and
`as withdrawal bleeding starting
`on day 22
`
`irregular
`
`bleeding
`
`counted
`
`as
`
`Spotting irregular
`
`bleeding requiring only one
`item per day
`
`protection
`
`Metrorrhagia irregular
`
`bleeding requiring the
`
`use of at
`
`least
`
`protection items per day
`
`All the patients
`analysis including those who skipped
`
`were
`
`counted
`
`in the cycle control
`
`pills or
`
`had
`
`history of metrorrhagia
`
`CHARACTERISTICS OF PATIENTS AT
`SCREENING
`
`The analysis
`
`was conducted
`
`on 235 patients
`
`One tablet of this pill 20 mcg ethinyl
`150 meg dcsogcstrel was to he
`the same time of
`taken each day preferably at
`tablet was taken on
`day for 21 days The first
`the first day of the period When the first strip
`was completed
`drug-free interval
`of
`days
`the women started
`had
`to elapse after which
`new strip Women who were switching the
`to observe
`oral contraceptive were
`drug-free
`days or
`as the case may be
`this new combined pill
`
`interval
`
`of
`
`before starting
`
`Evaluation
`
`of cycle control was based on
`
`highly precise definitions
`
`Withdrawal
`
`bleeding bleeding occurring in
`
`the drug-free intervaL
`
`Irregular bleeding bleeding occumng
`
`during the 21 days in which
`
`the contraceptive
`
`In the European multicenter
`
`study on
`
`1684 women
`
`b\ D.Scrfatv
`23.970
`use cycles
`totaling
`women 23.04- were
`less than 20 years of age The
`inde.x was 0.05 when this pill was
`taken correctly
`
`citcd
`
`387
`
`Pearl
`
`The efficacy
`
`for all
`
`ages
`
`of Mercilon
`
`has hence
`
`been demonstrated
`
`The number of cycles studied was 1305
`
`The patient characteristics
`235 pattents arc
`
`the screening
`listed in Table
`
`at
`
`visit
`
`Table
`
`screening
`
`Characteristics
`235 patients
`
`of patients at
`
`Age
`
`sd
`
`30
`
`30io35
`
`36to40
`40
`
`Parity
`
`Nulliparous
`
`Multiparous
`
`Smoking
`
`cigarettes/day
`
`cigarettes/day
`
`Contraception
`
`before
`
`screening
`
`None
`
`Oral
`
`local
`
`Cycle characteristics
`
`before
`
`Mercilon
`
`acIc duration di
`
`33.3 5.4
`7.3%
`
`46.1%
`
`30.8%
`
`15.8%
`
`24.3%
`
`75.7%
`764%
`
`10.3%
`
`13.3%
`
`209%
`59.t%
`
`14.9
`
`1%
`
`28.39
`
`Contraception-fertilite-sexualitd 1990 Vol 18 iVo
`
`pp 407-412
`
`WC_LP0405497
`
`Mylan v. Warner Chilcott IPR2015-00682
`WC Ex. 2016, Pg. 3
`
`

`
`it sd
`
`Regular cc1e
`
`Inegular
`
`cucle
`
`93.2%
`
`6.8%
`
`l.eiigtli
`
`ot period
`
`4.4
`
`.4
`
`Menstruation
`
`volume
`
`Lon 1-2 proiect/d
`
`Moderate
`
`proluct/d
`
`High
`
`protect/d
`
`28.5%
`
`60.Oci
`
`Irregtilar bleeding
`
`during
`
`pre
`
`screening
`
`cycle
`
`Spotuiiig
`
`Meirorrhagia
`
`Total
`
`Systolic blood pressure
`mm Hg in
`
`sd
`
`Diastolic
`rum Hg
`
`blood pressure
`
`vi
`
`sd
`
`Weight kg
`
`2.1%
`
`10.2%
`
`120.3
`
`10.7
`
`71.1
`
`7.3
`
`37.2 it 8.3
`
`leI 223
`
`211
`
`203
`
`201
`
`1.3%
`
`0.5%
`
`1.3%
`
`1.0%
`
`Cycle
`
`Cycle
`
`Cycle
`
`Table
`
`Before
`
`Mccci
`
`Ion
`
`Cycle
`
`Cycle
`
`_Cyclc
`
`Duration of withdrawal bleeding
`msd
`
`235
`
`229
`
`220
`
`198
`
`4.4
`
`4.1
`
`3.9
`
`3.9
`
`t.4
`
`1.7
`
`1.3
`
`1.3
`
`Overall withdrawal
`
`bleeding was
`
`shorter
`
`0.0000
`
`test
`
`of the same or
`
`Students
`for matched
`series and
`less volume than the cycle
`Tables
`and
`preceding Mcrcilon
`these two effects
`
`ingestion
`
`are generally considered
`
`beneficial
`
`by the patients
`
`RESULTS
`
`Evaluation of an oral contraceptive is based
`
`on three
`
`criteria efficacy
`
`cycle control
`
`and
`
`tolerance
`
`Efficacy
`
`observed
`
`skipped
`
`In terms of efficacy
`
`no pregnancies
`pills had
`though
`in 5.9% of the cycles studied
`
`even
`
`to
`
`lable
`
`Menstruation volume relative
`
`to pre
`
`screening
`
`cycle
`
`Menstruation
`
`volume
`
`Unchanged
`
`were
`
`been
`
`Cycle
`
`Cycle
`
`Cycle
`
`32.7%
`
`34.9%
`
`51.9%
`
`49.5%
`
`36.9%
`
`50.5%
`
`15.3%
`
`15.6%
`
`12.6%
`
`Cycle
`
`control
`
`Table
`
`Incidence
`
`of irregular bleeding
`
`Cycle
`n235
`3.4%
`
`Cycle
`n225
`0.0%
`
`17.6%
`
`14.3%
`
`Cycle
`n201
`1.0%
`
`6.5%
`
`2.9%
`
`23.9%
`
`1.3%
`
`15.6%
`
`1.0%
`
`8.5%
`
`Metrorrhagi
`
`Spotting
`
`Metrorrhagia
`
`spotting
`
`Total
`
`The results obtained
`
`for cycle control
`to those of other low-dose
`
`are fully
`
`oral
`
`comparable
`
`contraceptives
`
`Withdrawal
`
`bleeding was present in 98.7% of
`the cycles studied and only
`
`patients
`
`the study before the 611 cycle for
`interrupted
`amenorrhea The rates of amenorrhea
`
`per
`
`cycle are listed in Table
`
`Table
`
`91 Amenorrhea
`
`per cycle
`
`________
`
`Cycle
`
`233
`
`228
`
`1.7%
`
`1.7%
`
`Contrctception-fertilitØ-sexualttØ
`
`1990 Vol 18 No
`
`pp 407-412
`
`WC_LP0405498
`
`Mylan v. Warner Chilcott IPR2015-00682
`WC Ex. 2016, Pg. 4
`
`

`
`TabEe
`
`Overall
`
`percentage
`
`of cycles with
`
`tenderness
`
`irregular bleeding
`
`starting
`
`in patients
`this contraceptive Figure
`
`who had them before
`
`Metro rrhagi
`
`Spotting
`
`Metronhagia
`
`spotting
`
`Total
`
`1.4%
`
`10.7%
`
`.4%
`
`13.5%
`
`Over half
`these symptoms disappeared
`three months of switching to this new
`
`first
`
`in the
`
`contraceptive
`
`Weight
`
`is
`
`acceptability
`
`very important parameter
`of an oral contraceptive Weight
`
`in
`
`gain is
`
`very frequently invoked
`If we consider
`
`reason for
`
`who
`
`the patients
`stopping the pill
`the study and whose weight was
`months of
`
`completed
`known
`
`prior
`
`and after
`
`With respect
`be noted that all
`
`to irregular
`
`the patients
`
`it should
`
`hecding
`were counted
`
`in
`
`the evaluation of this criterion including
`those who had irregular
`bleeding before their
`inclusion 10.2% and those who reported
`skipped Mercilon pills The incidence
`having
`
`of
`
`these irregular
`
`bleedings is listed in Tables
`
`and
`
`As is normal with low-dose
`
`oral
`
`taking this pill
`
`test
`
`this
`
`contraceptives
`
`this incidence
`
`decreases
`
`as the
`
`test
`
`to screening
`there was no significant
`change
`for matched series
`in weight Students
`patient 0.4% stopped
`pill before
`Only one
`the end of the study clue to weight gain
`
`As in the case of weight the blood pressure
`numbers did not change
`statistically
`significantly
`for matched series during the
`Students
`study Only one woman 0.4% stopped
`this
`before the months were
`up due to increased
`
`pill
`
`blood pressure
`
`Dropouts
`
`the initial 235 patients 33 withdrew
`
`from the
`
`study before the end of the 6th cycle namely
`14.0% Of
`these 33 25 patients
`stopped
`to intolerance namely 10.6%
`
`treatment due
`
`The reasons
`
`for these dropouts
`
`are listed in Table
`
`The side
`
`effects
`
`causing
`
`this new pill
`
`to be
`
`dropped before months in 25 patients are
`One patient may have more
`shown
`in Table
`side effect
`
`than one
`
`that
`
`it should
`
`he noted
`
`cycles progress moreover
`the great majority of these
`irregular
`by spotting The
`
`bleedings is represented
`main factor
`
`in evaluating irregular
`bleeding is
`its acceptability with this new combination
`
`is high as only 13 patients
`pill acceptability
`out of 235 or 5.5% stopped
`
`taking the
`
`pill
`
`during the study or after completing
`months due
`
`to rnetrorrhagia
`
`and/or spotting
`
`the
`
`Tolerance
`
`this multicenter study looked
`
`at clinical
`
`tolerance of this contraceptive preparation
`
`containing only 20 nicg of ethinyl estradiol
`The side effects occurring in the first
`and between months
`months of the pill
`
`and
`
`were
`
`gathered
`
`Table
`
`lists the main side effects
`
`reported To
`
`be noted is the high frequency
`
`before the
`
`contraceptive studied was taken of breast
`
`tenderness
`to be estrogen-
`acknowledged
`dependent 17.4% headache
`20.8% and
`nervousness 14%
`
`dose
`
`by 33% the estrogen
`The benefits
`of reducing
`DSG 50 meg are
`in EE 20 meg
`clearly evident when we look at
`the change
`
`in
`
`these symptoms
`
`particularly
`
`breast
`
`Conzraception-ferriilitØ-.sexualitc/
`
`1990 Vol 18 No
`
`pp 407-4/2
`
`WC_LP0405499
`
`Mylan v. Warner Chilcott IPR2015-00682
`WC Ex. 2016, Pg. 5
`
`

`
`No pregnancies
`were
`
`skipped
`
`were
`
`observed
`
`even
`
`though pills
`
`in 5.9% of the cycles
`
`The excellent efficacy of this new contraceptive
`is based
`on desogestrel
`powerful
`the leader of the new-
`
`antigonadotropic
`
`generation progestogens
`
`Cycle
`
`control
`
`pmved satisfactory withdrawal
`
`bleeding tended to be shorter
`it was absent
`
`on this pill
`cycles studied
`
`and
`
`less abundant
`
`in only 1.3% of the
`
`As with all oral contraceptives
`
`irregular
`
`as
`
`it
`
`was found
`
`spotting
`
`the cycles progressed
`bleeding decreased
`in only 8.5% 6.5% of which were
`by the 611 cycle The
`of the patients
`rate is high as only 13 patients
`acceptability
`namely 5.5% of the study population
`
`Mastoclynii n4l
`
`Hesdaclie
`
`ii
`
`49
`
`clout
`
`before
`
`3dnic
`
`rd
`
`enw
`
`95
`
`Figure
`
`Change
`
`in the incidence
`
`of pre
`and headache
`
`existing breast
`Mercilon
`
`tenderness
`
`taking this contraceptive due
`to irregular
`bleeding 10 stopped before months and
`the end of
`not wish to continue with the pill until
`
`did
`
`on
`
`the study
`
`stopped
`
`Table
`
`Main side effects
`
`reported
`
`The clinical
`
`benefits
`
`of the 33% reduction in
`
`Before
`
`EB
`
`20 LflcC
`DSG ISO
`
`nicg
`
`is
`
`235
`
`4.7%
`
`During tirsi
`
`TreaiweliL
`
`cycles
`
`to
`
`21
`
`treatment
`
`cycles
`
`235
`
`3.4%
`
`dose
`
`to the estrogen contained
`estrogen
`of
`in low-dose pills are the low incidence
`
`relative
`
`subjective estrogen-dependent
`
`side effects
`
`breast
`
`tenderness
`
`who
`
`in patients
`particularly
`this symptom before taking this pill breast
`
`had
`
`tenderness
`disappeared
`over 50% of cases
`
`in the first
`
`months
`
`in
`
`for one patient who stopped this
`Except
`contraceptive before the end of the study due to
`gain arid another who stopped due
`
`weight
`
`to an
`
`increase in blood pressure neither weight nor
`blood
`nLimbers
`
`changed
`
`to
`
`statistically
`
`pressure
`degree
`
`significant
`
`Vaginal dryness
`
`which
`
`reducing
`
`esiradiol
`
`level could theoretically
`
`the ethinyl
`bring about
`
`was not reported by any of the 235 patients
`
`Nausea
`
`Breast
`
`tndriss
`
`tclldache
`
`Nervousness
`
`Depression
`
`lucr
`
`libido
`
`Deer
`
`libido
`
`Lower
`
`limb
`
`pain
`
`C000S
`
`irisufliciency
`
`18.7%
`
`15.3%
`
`5.5%
`1%
`
`1.7%
`
`4.2%
`
`7.4%
`
`211.8%
`
`14.0%
`
`5.1%
`
`2.5%
`
`3.0%
`
`2.1%
`
`19%
`
`13.7%
`
`2.3%
`
`2.8%
`
`2-1%
`
`0.9%
`
`2.4%
`
`8%
`
`COMMENTS AND CONCLUSION
`
`The efficacy and clinical
`tolerance of
`oral contraceptive Mercilon 20 mcg
`150 meg desogestrel were
`ethinyl
`studied in 235 women over
`1305 cycles
`
`estradiol
`
`new
`
`This was multicenter open-label non-
`
`comparative
`
`study lasting
`
`cycles in which
`
`37 French physicians collaborated
`
`continuation rate for Mercilon at
`The overall
`months is high for
`low-dose
`It was 86% Indeed the actual
`for this new pill
`at months is 88.9% 202 out of
`227 women if only stoppages
`due
`are counted
`
`oral contraceptive
`
`continuation rate
`
`to taking the
`
`pill
`
`Contraception
`
`jrtilitd-sexua1itØ
`
`1990 Vol 18 No
`
`pp 407-412
`
`WC_LP0405500
`
`Mylan v. Warner Chilcott IPR2015-00682
`WC Ex. 2016, Pg. 6
`
`

`
`Table
`
`Reasons
`
`for Irolout
`
`Certain contraindications
`
`for combined oral
`
`Intolerance
`
`Patients wish
`
`Intercurrent
`
`medical
`
`reason
`
`Non-medical
`
`reason
`
`No.of
`
`patients
`
`25
`
`10.6%
`
`2.6%
`
`0.4%
`
`0.4%
`
`Table
`
`Reasons
`
`for stopping Mereilon
`
`lrernattl rely
`
`Cycle disorder
`
`amenorrhea
`
`spotting
`
`oligornenorrhea
`
`spotting
`
`metrorrhagia
`
`spotting
`
`monoiThagia
`
`decreased
`
`libido
`
`Breast tenderness
`
`Headache
`
`Weight gain
`
`legs
`
`venous
`
`insufficiency
`
`Heavy
`Nausea
`
`Nervousness
`High BP
`Exacerbation
`
`of depression
`
`Metabolic
`
`disorders
`
`contraceptives linked
`
`to age smoking
`discrete metabolic disorder
`for example and
`
`or
`
`certain
`
`forms of
`
`intolerance of other low-dose
`combined oral contraceptives such as weigh
`gain headache
`breast
`tenderness
`and
`lower limb pain may be second-choice
`of this new low-dose pill
`indications
`
`nervousness
`
`This pill ushers in lie fourth generation of
`combined oral contraceptive pills namely pills
`and
`containing less than 30 meg etbioyl
`estradiol
`
`so-called
`
`new-generation
`
`progestogen
`
`desogestrel
`
`gestodene
`
`norgestimate
`
`The reasonable
`
`hope
`
`is that
`
`thanks to this
`
`significant
`
`of these
`
`reduction in estrogen dose
`new progestogens
`
`that are metabolically
`
`and
`
`the use
`
`very well
`will continue
`
`to decline
`
`tolerated the vascular risk of the
`
`pill
`
`REFERENCES
`
`Sonata
`
`eihinyf
`
`estradiol
`
`of
`
`17-27
`
`published
`
`by
`
`A155iA
`
`dc
`
`cc
`
`unnail
`
`lid
`
`Cl
`
`II
`
`212
`
`tIc9
`
`rrliicylccrndnc.l
`
`bynncclcigc
`
`Rpkcrn
`
`cai Cnflhnncnnnrcniai_
`
`nndinp
`Obcicnoic
`
`of
`
`and
`
`c0npn-
`Ccc
`do
`
`The pill sith 30 micrograms
`to Fourth Scieniifir Meeting
`National Fedei anon of Medical Gynecology
`January 13 1989 pages
`Associations
`Paris
`Brun
`Cc bib donod
`iloilcc
`ni9 99iir.colnpl
`dcc Xii 9p0 cana
`loon beIC
`.ac
`of
`Iannbn
`Cc nIh and
`
`ndl
`
`rIp /9122
`
`$592
`
`an
`
`iaainncn
`
`Pabihinbc9
`
`uncap
`
`fccf ccnccp
`bc/c
`
`Finarri
`
`ccci
`
`canons
`
`and
`
`ncuaincic
`
`Jima
`
`Cci
`
`50
`
`dmogcccnl
`
`nlndy of
`con
`Cncccpp
`
`ncdacn
`9/1
`
`99
`
`.9
`
`ci
`
`cdi..Eifrnucf
`0.029
`picc
`ni.anyinnfcadicl
`rolijnlro .%ud I7iaul
`
`rig
`
`cnn
`
`cc
`
`.naadptcaacllauijlan
`ccbclcdnr
`incolab
`
`con
`
`rbronaf Sd 9/2
`
`app
`
`20
`
`IlOf clnnlcladcl
`229.243
`
`YArd IfLO 9509
`dccclpl
`0150
`mob
`bobby
`2natalo
`ill 2972
`
`iSLALA
`211
`019 dnsnrcc
`non
`nni
`
`proi
`179cm
`
`and
`
`rIcanna
`
`Oucrcl.ScanJ
`
`ccli
`
`fOnts
`
`of
`
`17121/
`
`org
`
`ndcicylnroodjoi
`
`anniihuonbin
`
`dcc ttl colrlcnpnin
`cci dcci
`lijdd SI/SQ
`fiVrcfyic
`conoo Anna
`
`iii
`
`orniciry
`
`cn00aocinn
`
`0.120
`
`in Ircolcry
`
`Off 5m 124.57-nd
`
`OAi.7i1
`n/mont
`nalcc
`49592
`
`79
`
`ccii
`
`coo
`
`In nodomnoac
`
`ioa-daco
`and
`
`nalaogon
`
`oaal
`
`cOOinlCnprac
`
`lipid
`
`onaIcs
`
`Crcaracrpri..a
`
`nnmtb
`
`19/7
`
`ponaodlnrc
`
`Lipothymia
`
`The advantages
`
`the estrogen dose
`of reducing
`new
`to 20 meg associated with those of
`desogestrel make
`
`generation progcstogen
`
`Mereilon
`
`remarkably
`
`effective
`
`pill with
`
`satisfactory
`
`clinical
`
`cycle control and excellent
`tolerance numerous other stLidics
`
`also show the
`confirm these results
`and
`excellent metabolic tolerance 3-6
`lipid tolerance and hemostasis
`
`particularly
`
`reducing
`
`effect
`
`9Directur
`
`Birth Conan Center Saint-Louis
`
`Uospiial
`
`Paris
`
`These characteristics
`
`mean that
`this pill
`FE and
`150
`containing 20 micrograms
`micrograms DSG can be the first choice
`all women seen
`for contraception and having
`for this method
`no contraindications
`
`for
`
`Coirraceptiori-fertilird-sexuolird
`
`1990
`
`Vo/
`
`18 No
`
`pp 407-412
`
`WC_LP0405501
`
`Mylan v. Warner Chilcott IPR2015-00682
`WC Ex. 2016, Pg. 7
`
`

`
`tLPI
`
`UAi uEyi/ s/_
`
`contraception
`5exuallte
`
`FtFfLJ1
`
`FE838KE
`04 26 8/01
`
`Contraception-fertilitØ-sexualitØ 1990 Vol 18 No
`
`pp 407-412
`
`WC_LP0405502
`
`Mylan v. Warner Chilcott IPR2015-00682
`WC Ex. 2016, Pg. 8
`
`

`
`TRANS PERFECT
`
`CERTIFICATION
`
`Katharine Perekslis
`
`am fluent
`
`in the French
`
`and English Languages
`
`hereby
`
`certi that
`
`the document
`
`identified
`
`below was translated
`
`from French to English by
`
`competent
`
`translator
`
`of the English and French languages
`
`was edited
`
`by
`
`roN
`
`Transperfect Quality Manager
`
`qualified
`
`to review and edit
`
`the French and English
`
`languages
`
`and
`
`that
`
`the translation
`
`is true accurate
`
`and complete to
`
`the best of my
`
`knowledge and belief
`
`The 20 Microgrim Ethinyl EstNd ol plus
`Microgr ml Desogestrel
`on 235 Women
`for Months
`
`MLiltrcenter
`
`Study
`
`Pill
`
`declare under penalty of perjury
`
`under
`
`the laws of the United
`
`States
`
`of America tliar
`
`the foregoing is true and correct
`
`Signature
`
`Sworn to before nic
`
`tins
`
`29th day of Jan nary 2007
`
`Signature Notar
`
`ic
`
`BRENDA tONZALEZ
`NOTARYTATt0EWfO
`
`OUAUFIED
`MY COMMISSION
`
`IN BRONX
`
`EXPIRES
`
`COUNTY
`MAY 10 20_
`
`Stamp Notary
`
`PLiblic
`
`New York NY
`
`THREE
`
`EARK AVENUE
`
`39TH
`
`FLOOR NEW YORK NY 10016
`
`212.6895555
`
`212.689.1059
`
`WWW.TfiAN5FERFECT.COM
`
`WC_LP0405503
`
`Mylan v. Warner Chilcott IPR2015-00682
`WC Ex. 2016, Pg. 9

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket